pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07228 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · ⚛️ physics.soc-ph · cs.GT· cs.SI· math.DS· q-bio.PE

Emergence of cooperation in nonlinear higher-order public goods games

Jaume Llabr\'es , Onkar Sadekar , Federico Malizia , Federico Battiston This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.soc-ph cs.GTcs.SImath.DSq-bio.PE
keywords evolutionary game theorypublic goods gamehypergraphscooperationnonlinear dynamicsbistabilityscale-free networkshigher-order interactions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nonlinear public goods games on hypergraphs allow mixed-order groups to sustain cooperation alongside bistability.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines how nonlinear payoffs in public goods games, where each added cooperator changes the collective benefit through synergy or discounting, behave when played on hypergraphs that represent overlapping groups of varying sizes. In populations where every game has the same number of players, the shift toward cooperation is either gradual or sudden depending on the exact shape of the nonlinearity. When games of different sizes coexist, however, the dynamics expand to include a persistent regime in which bistability and cooperation remain active together rather than resolving to one outcome. Scale-free hypergraphs further increase the fraction of cooperators, but only when the starting locations of cooperators and the correlations in group degrees are taken into account. These results matter because many real social, economic, and ecological interactions involve groups that differ in size and overlap, offering a more accurate way to understand how cooperation can persist under seemingly unfavorable conditions.

Core claim

In well-mixed populations, single-order nonlinear public goods games display a change in the nature of the transition from continuous to discontinuous depending on the exact form of nonlinearity. By contrast, mixed-order public goods games, where games with different numbers of players coexist, exhibit a richer dynamical regime wherein a state of active coexistence of bistability and cooperation can arise. On scale-free hypergraphs, cooperation is promoted, with the initial placement of cooperators and the presence of hyperdegree correlations playing crucial roles.

What carries the argument

Nonlinear collective reinforcement in public goods games on hypergraphs, which encodes synergistic or discounting effects for each additional cooperator across groups of varying sizes.

If this is right

  • Mixed-order games produce a stable regime in which bistability and cooperation coexist dynamically, unlike the simpler transitions seen in single-order games.
  • Scale-free hypergraphs increase overall cooperation levels compared with uniform random hypergraphs.
  • The long-term level of cooperation depends on the precise starting distribution of cooperators in the hypergraph.
  • Hyperdegree correlations between groups alter the spread of cooperation under nonlinear payoffs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Real social systems whose groups vary in size and overlap may support cooperation more readily than uniform-size models predict.
  • Evolutionary models of multiplayer interactions could gain accuracy by representing structure as hypergraphs rather than ordinary networks.
  • Interventions to encourage cooperation might deliberately create networks with scale-free properties and diverse group sizes.
  • Laboratory experiments that allow participants to form groups of different sizes could test whether the predicted coexistence of bistability and cooperation appears in practice.

Load-bearing premise

The specific mathematical form chosen for the nonlinear payoff reinforcement and the assumption that a static hypergraph plus fixed initial cooperator locations fully capture the relevant interactions without mechanisms such as strategy-dependent group formation.

What would settle it

Numerical simulations of the replicator dynamics on a scale-free hypergraph with mixed-order games that show whether removing hyperdegree correlations eliminates the reported increase in cooperation relative to random hypergraphs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07228 by Federico Battiston, Federico Malizia, Jaume Llabr\'es, Onkar Sadekar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Evolutionary game theory has provided substantial contributions to explain the emergence of cooperation under unfavourable conditions in ecology, economics, and the social sciences. Recently, inspired by newly available empirical evidence on group interactions, higher-order networks have emerged as a natural framework to properly encode multiplayer games in structured populations. Here, we study the emergence of cooperation in a nonlinear public goods game (PGG) on hypergraphs, where collective reinforcement captures the synergistic or discounting effect associated with each additional cooperator. In well-mixed populations, single-order PGGs, where all games have the same number of players, display a change in the nature of transition from continuous to discontinuous depending on the exact form of nonlinearity. By contrast, mixed-order PGGs, where games with different number of players coexist, exhibit a richer dynamical regime wherein a state of active coexistence of bistability and cooperation can arise. We further find that scale-free hypergraphs promote cooperation, highlighting the crucial role played by both the initial placement of cooperators and the presence of hyperdegree correlations. Overall, our results provide a comprehensive characterization of nonlinear PGGs on hypergraphs and open up new avenues for richer models of evolutionary dynamics of multiplayer interactions on structured populations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies the emergence of cooperation in nonlinear public goods games (PGGs) played on hypergraphs. It reports that single-order PGGs (fixed group size) exhibit a transition from continuous to discontinuous phase transitions depending on the form of nonlinearity in collective reinforcement, whereas mixed-order PGGs (coexisting group sizes) produce a richer regime featuring active coexistence of bistability and cooperation. The work further claims that scale-free hypergraphs promote cooperation and that both the initial placement of cooperators and hyperdegree correlations play crucial roles.

Significance. If the reported simulation results hold under broader conditions, the manuscript offers a useful extension of evolutionary game theory to higher-order interactions by showing how mixing interaction orders can qualitatively alter dynamical regimes beyond what single-order models predict. The explicit treatment of synergistic/discounting effects and hypergraph topology (including correlations) is a constructive step toward more realistic models of multiplayer cooperation in structured populations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and results on mixed-order dynamics: the central claim that mixed-order PGGs generically produce an 'active coexistence of bistability and cooperation' rests on simulations using one specific family of nonlinear reinforcement functions (synergistic or discounting). No tests with qualitatively different nonlinearities (e.g., threshold or saturating forms outside the reported parametrization) are shown, so it remains unclear whether the richer regime is a structural consequence of mixing orders or an artifact of the chosen functional family.
  2. [Methods] Methods and numerical results: the reported transitions and promotion effects on scale-free hypergraphs depend on specific hypergraph generation rules and initial cooperator placement. Without explicit verification of numerical stability across random seeds, hypergraph ensemble sizes, or alternative generation algorithms (e.g., configuration model vs. preferential attachment variants), it is difficult to assess whether the claimed distinctions between single- and mixed-order regimes are robust.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model definition] Notation for the nonlinearity exponent and synergy/discount factor should be introduced once with a clear equation reference and then used consistently; occasional redefinition risks confusion when comparing single- and mixed-order cases.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the phase diagrams should explicitly state the hypergraph parameters (e.g., power-law exponent, correlation strength) and the number of independent realizations averaged, to allow direct reproduction of the reported bistability regions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major point below, indicating the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and results on mixed-order dynamics: the central claim that mixed-order PGGs generically produce an 'active coexistence of bistability and cooperation' rests on simulations using one specific family of nonlinear reinforcement functions (synergistic or discounting). No tests with qualitatively different nonlinearities (e.g., threshold or saturating forms outside the reported parametrization) are shown, so it remains unclear whether the richer regime is a structural consequence of mixing orders or an artifact of the chosen functional family.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's concern regarding the scope of the nonlinearity. Our power-law reinforcement function (with exponent r) is chosen because it provides a continuous parametrization that spans the linear case (r=1) and the synergistic (r>1) and discounting (r<1) regimes commonly studied in the PGG literature. The active coexistence in mixed-order settings emerges from the interplay between heterogeneous group sizes and this nonlinearity, rather than from a narrow functional choice. Nevertheless, we agree that the claim of genericity would benefit from explicit qualification. In the revised manuscript we will expand the discussion in the abstract and main text to clarify the scope of the functional family, note that qualitatively different forms (e.g., sharp thresholds) may produce different quantitative boundaries, and suggest this as an avenue for future work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods and numerical results: the reported transitions and promotion effects on scale-free hypergraphs depend on specific hypergraph generation rules and initial cooperator placement. Without explicit verification of numerical stability across random seeds, hypergraph ensemble sizes, or alternative generation algorithms (e.g., configuration model vs. preferential attachment variants), it is difficult to assess whether the claimed distinctions between single- and mixed-order regimes are robust.

    Authors: We agree that explicit robustness information improves the manuscript. Our simulations employed the configuration-model hypergraph generator to fix the hyperdegree distribution while controlling for correlations, and all reported quantities were averaged over 100 independent hypergraph realizations with at least 50 independent initial-condition runs per realization (both uniform random and hub-biased cooperator placement). We will revise the Methods section to state these ensemble sizes, the number of random seeds, and the convergence criteria explicitly. While we did not compare every alternative generator, the promotion of cooperation on scale-free structures is driven by the heavy-tailed hyperdegree distribution itself; we will add a short paragraph noting that the qualitative distinction between single- and mixed-order regimes is expected to persist under other scale-free constructions, but that a systematic comparison lies beyond the present scope. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from explicit forward simulation of a defined model.

full rationale

The paper's claims rest on numerical simulations of evolutionary game dynamics on hypergraphs using an explicitly stated nonlinear payoff function for collective reinforcement. No equations or results reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The functional form of nonlinearity is presented as a modeling choice whose consequences are explored, not derived from the outcomes themselves. The derivation chain is self-contained against the stated assumptions and simulation protocol.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on standard evolutionary game theory update rules and introduces free parameters for the nonlinearity function plus hypergraph generation rules; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • nonlinearity exponent or synergy/discount factor
    Controls whether additional cooperators produce synergistic gains or diminishing returns; its specific form determines continuous versus discontinuous transitions.
  • hypergraph generation parameters (e.g., degree distribution, correlation strength)
    Scale-free property and hyperdegree correlations are varied to observe promotion of cooperation.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Population evolves according to imitation or birth-death rules on the hypergraph structure.
    Standard assumption in structured evolutionary game theory invoked to define the dynamics.
  • domain assumption Hypergraphs accurately encode higher-order group interactions without additional temporal or strategy-dependent rewiring.
    Core modeling premise stated in the setup of multiplayer games on hypergraphs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5535 in / 1469 out tokens · 52188 ms · 2026-05-10T17:23:48.836365+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. A. Nowak and R. Highfield,SuperCooperators: altru- ism, evolution, and why we need each other to succeed, 1st ed. (Free Press, New York, NY, 2012)

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    N. A. Christakis and J. H. Fowler, Friendship and nat- ural selection, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111, 10796 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    N. A. Christakis,Blueprint: The evolutionary origins of a good society(Little, Brown Spark, 2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Von Neumann and O

    J. Von Neumann and O. Morgenstern,Theory of games and economic behavior(Princeton University Press, 1944)

    work page 1944

  5. [5]

    J. M. Smith and G. R. Price, The Logic of Animal Con- flict, Nature246, 15 (1973)

    work page 1973

  6. [6]

    Hauert and G

    C. Hauert and G. Szabó, Game theory and physics, American Journal of Physics73, 405 (2005)

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    M. Perc, J. J. Jordan, D. G. Rand, Z. Wang, S. Boc- caletti, and A. Szolnoki, Statistical physics of human co- operation, Physics Reports687, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    J. F. Nash Jr, Equilibrium points in n-person games, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences36, 48 (1950)

    work page 1950

  9. [9]

    Hardin, The Tragedy of the Commons: The popu- lation problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality., Science162, 1243 (1968)

    G. Hardin, The Tragedy of the Commons: The popu- lation problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality., Science162, 1243 (1968)

    work page 1968

  10. [10]

    Maynard Smith,Evolution and the theory of games (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ; New York, 1982)

    J. Maynard Smith,Evolution and the theory of games (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ; New York, 1982)

    work page 1982

  11. [11]

    R.Dawkins,The selfish gene,30thed.(OxfordUniversity Press, Oxford ; New York, 2006)

    work page 2006

  12. [12]

    P. D. Taylor and L. B. Jonker, Evolutionary stable strate- gies and game dynamics, Mathematical Biosciences40, 145 (1978)

    work page 1978

  13. [13]

    Hofbauer and K

    J. Hofbauer and K. Sigmund,Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1998)

    work page 1998

  14. [14]

    Albert and A.-L

    R. Albert and A.-L. Barabási, Statistical mechanics of complex networks, Reviews of Modern Physics74, 47 (2002)

    work page 2002

  15. [15]

    Newman,Networks(Oxford University Press, 2018)

    M. Newman,Networks(Oxford University Press, 2018)

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Boccaletti, V

    S. Boccaletti, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. Chavez, and D.- U. Hwang, Complex networks: Structure and dynamics, Physics Reports424, 175 (2006)

    work page 2006

  17. [17]

    Berge,Hypergraphs: combinatorics of finite sets, Vol

    C. Berge,Hypergraphs: combinatorics of finite sets, Vol. 45 (Elsevier, 1984)

    work page 1984

  18. [18]

    Battiston, G

    F. Battiston, G. Cencetti, I. Iacopini, V. Latora, M. Lu- cas, A. Patania, J.-G. Young, and G. Petri, Networks beyond pairwise interactions: Structure and dynamics, Physics Reports874, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Battiston, E

    F. Battiston, E. Amico, A. Barrat, G. Bianconi, G. Fer- raz de Arruda, B. Franceschiello, I. Iacopini, S. Kéfi, V. Latora, Y. Moreno,et al., The physics of higher-order interactions in complex systems, Nature physics17, 1093 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Battiston, V

    F. Battiston, V. Capraro, F. Karimi, S. Lehmann, A. B. Migliano, O. Sadekar, A. Sánchez, and M. Perc, Higher- order interactions shape collective human behaviour, Na- ture Human Behaviour , 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Battiston, C

    F. Battiston, C. Bick, M. Lucas, A. P. Millán, P. S. Skardal, and Y. Zhang, Collective dynamics on higher- order networks, Nature Reviews Physics , 1 (2026)

    work page 2026

  22. [22]

    Pastor-Satorras and A

    R. Pastor-Satorras and A. Vespignani, Epidemic spread- ing in scale-free networks, Physical Review Letters86, 3200 (2001)

    work page 2001

  23. [23]

    F. C. Santos and J. M. Pacheco, Scale-free networks pro- vide a unifying framework for the emergence of coopera- tion, Physical Review Letters95, 098104 (2005)

    work page 2005

  24. [24]

    F. C. Santos, J. M. Pacheco, and T. Lenaerts, Evolution- ary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heteroge- neous populations, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences103, 3490 (2006)

    work page 2006

  25. [25]

    M. A. Nowak and R. M. May, Evolutionary games and spatial chaos, Nature359, 826 (1992)

    work page 1992

  26. [26]

    Szabó and G

    G. Szabó and G. Fath, Evolutionary games on graphs, Physics Reports446, 97 (2007)

    work page 2007

  27. [27]

    M. A. Nowak, Five rules for the evolution of cooperation, Science314, 1560 (2006)

    work page 2006

  28. [28]

    Lieberman, C

    E. Lieberman, C. Hauert, and M. A. Nowak, Evolution- ary dynamics on graphs, Nature433, 312 (2005)

    work page 2005

  29. [29]

    Ohtsuki, C

    H. Ohtsuki, C. Hauert, E. Lieberman, and M. A. Nowak, A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks, Nature441, 502 (2006)

    work page 2006

  30. [30]

    Allen, G

    B. Allen, G. Lippner, Y.-T. Chen, B. Fotouhi, N. Mo- meni, S.-T. Yau, and M. A. Nowak, Evolutionary dynam- ics on any population structure, Nature544, 227 (2017)

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    F. C. Santos, M. D. Santos, and J. M. Pacheco, Social diversitypromotestheemergenceofcooperationinpublic goods games, Nature454, 213 (2008)

    work page 2008

  32. [32]

    M. Perc, J. Gómez-Gardenes, A. Szolnoki, L. M. Floría, and Y. Moreno, Evolutionary dynamics of group interac- tions on structured populations: a review, Journal of the Royal Society Interface10(2013)

    work page 2013

  33. [33]

    Hauert, F

    C. Hauert, F. Michor, M. A. Nowak, and M. Doebeli, Synergy and discounting of cooperation in social dilem- mas, Journal of Theoretical Biology239, 195 (2006), spe- cial Issue in Memory of John Maynard Smith

    work page 2006

  34. [34]

    Alvarez-Rodriguez, F

    U. Alvarez-Rodriguez, F. Battiston, G. F. de Arruda, Y. Moreno, M. Perc, and V. Latora, Evolutionary dy- namics of higher-order interactions in social networks, Nature Human Behaviour5, 586 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Civilini, O

    A. Civilini, O. Sadekar, F. Battiston, J. Gómez- Gardeñes, and V. Latora, Explosive cooperation in so- cial dilemmas on higher-order networks, Physical Review Letters132, 167401 (2024). 9

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Burgio, J

    G. Burgio, J. T. Matamalas, S. Gómez, and A. Arenas, Evolution of cooperation in the presence of higher-order interactions: Fromnetworkstohypergraphs,Entropy22, 744 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    H. Guo, D. Jia, I. Sendiña-Nadal, M. Zhang, Z. Wang, X. Li, K. Alfaro-Bittner, Y. Moreno, and S. Boccaletti, Evolutionary games on simplicial complexes, Chaos, Soli- tons & Fractals150, 111103 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    M. Gao, Z. Li, T. Wu, and L. Wang, Evolutionary dy- namics of multiplayer ultimatum games on hypergraphs, Physical Review E111, 054305 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Sheng, Q

    A. Sheng, Q. Su, L. Wang, and J. B. Plotkin, Strat- egy evolution on higher-order networks, Nature Compu- tational Science4, 274 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Sadekar, A

    O. Sadekar, A. Civilini, V. Latora, and F. Battiston, Drivers of cooperation in social dilemmas on higher- order networks, Journal of the Royal Society Interface 22, 20250134 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    J. Guo, Y. Meng, and A. Li, Evolutionary game dy- namics for higher-order interactions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.06411 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    D. Wang, P. Yi, Y. Hong, J. Chen, and G. Yan, Emer- gence of cooperation promoted by higher-order strat- egy updates, PLOS Computational Biology21, e1012891 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Wang and S

    Y. Wang and S. Gao, Evolution of cooperation on hy- pergraphs with heterogeneous update dynamics, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals204, 117776 (2026)

    work page 2026

  44. [44]

    X. Wang, L. Zhou, A. McAvoy, Z. Tian, and A. Li, Strat- egy evolution on temporal hypergraphs, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences123, e2516380123 (2026)

    work page 2026

  45. [45]

    Iacopini, G

    I. Iacopini, G. Petri, A. Barrat, and V. Latora, Simplicial models of social contagion, Nature Communications10, 2485 (2019)

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    P. S. Skardal and A. Arenas, Abrupt desynchronization and extensive multistability in globally coupled oscillator simplexes, Physical Review Letters122, 248301 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Neuhäuser, A

    L. Neuhäuser, A. Mellor, and R. Lambiotte, Multibody interactions and nonlinear consensus dynamics on net- worked systems, Physical Review E101, 032310 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Robiglio, L

    T. Robiglio, L. Di Gaetano, A. Altieri, G. Petri, and F. Battiston, Higher-order ising model on hypergraphs, Physical Review E112, L022301 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Pérez-Martínez, S

    H. Pérez-Martínez, S. Lamata-Otín, F. Malizia, L. M. Floría, J. Gómez-Gardeñes, and D. Soriano-Paños, So- cial polarization promoted by sparse higher-order inter- actions, Communications Physics (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    Li and L

    A. Li and L. Wang, Evolutionary dynamics of synergistic and discounted group interactions in structured popula- tions, Journal of Theoretical Biology377, 57 (2015)

    work page 2015

  51. [51]

    N. W. Landry and J. G. Restrepo, The effect of het- erogeneity on hypergraph contagion models, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science30(2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    St-Onge, I

    G. St-Onge, I. Iacopini, V. Latora, A. Barrat, G. Petri, A. Allard, and L. Hébert-Dufresne, Influential groups for seeding and sustaining nonlinear contagion in het- erogeneous hypergraphs, Communications Physics5, 25 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Zhang, M

    Y. Zhang, M. Lucas, and F. Battiston, Higher-order in- teractions shape collective dynamics differently in hyper- graphs and simplicial complexes, Nature communications 14, 1605 (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    Malizia, A

    F. Malizia, A. Guzmán, I. Iacopini, and I. Z. Kiss, Disen- tangling the role of heterogeneity and hyperedge overlap in explosive contagion on higher-order networks, Physical Review Letters135, 207401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Lucas, L

    M. Lucas, L. Gallo, A. Ghavasieh, F. Battiston, and M. De Domenico, Reducibility of higher-order networks from dynamics, Nature Communications (2026)

    work page 2026

  56. [56]

    Marwell and R

    G. Marwell and R. E. Ames, Experiments on the pro- vision of public goods. i. resources, interest, group size, and the free-rider problem, American Journal of Sociol- ogy84, 1335 (1979)

    work page 1979

  57. [57]

    Traulsen, M

    A. Traulsen, M. A. Nowak, and J. M. Pacheco, Stochastic dynamics of invasion and fixation, Physical Review E74, 011909 (2006)

    work page 2006

  58. [58]

    Q. F. Lotito, M. Contisciani, C. De Bacco, L. Di Gae- tano, L. Gallo, A. Montresor, F. Musciotto, N. Ruggeri, and F. Battiston, Hypergraphx: a library for higher- order network analysis, Journal of Complex Networks11, cnad019 (2023). Appendix A: Details of the stochastic simulations. Extraction of stationary branches from temporal trajectories The stochas...

    work page 2023