pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07792 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY· math.OC

Towards socio-techno-economic power systems with demand-side flexibility

Hanmin Cai , Federica Bellizio , Yi Guo , Gabriele Humbert , Mina Montazeri , Julie Rousseau , Matthias Brandes , Arnab Chatterjee
show 6 more authors
Andrea Gattiglio Leandro von Krannichfeldt Emmanouil Thrampoulidis Varsha N. Behrunani Goran Strbac Philipp Heer
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SYmath.OC
keywords demand-side flexibilitysocio-techno-economic systemsrenewable energy integrationpower gridselectricity marketsbuilding sectormobility sectortransdisciplinary collaboration
0
0 comments X

The pith

A holistic socio-techno-economic framework with bidirectional information flows is required to fully identify, measure, and utilize demand-side flexibility for integrating renewables.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews advances that let buildings and electric vehicles adjust their electricity use to support more renewable generation in power grids. It argues that these gains depend on treating the overall setup as one interconnected socio-techno-economic system rather than separate engineering, market, or social problems. The review stresses that information must move both ways between end users, control systems, markets, and grids so decisions can be coordinated. Without this integration the potential benefits stay fragmented and limited. The authors state that further cross-field collaboration and workable business models are still needed before the approach can be widely applied.

Core claim

The paper establishes that an abstraction of a socio-techno-economic power system, linking end-users in the building and mobility sectors with control systems, electricity markets, and power grids through bidirectional information flows and coordinated decision-making, provides the necessary structure for identifying, measuring, and utilizing demand-side flexibility to maximize multi-stakeholder benefits in renewable-based power systems.

What carries the argument

The socio-techno-economic system abstraction that models interconnections between end-users, building and mobility sectors, control systems, electricity markets, and power grids, with emphasis on bidirectional information flows and coordinated decision-making across domains.

If this is right

  • Greater shares of renewable energy can be integrated into existing power grids without major new infrastructure.
  • Global CO2 emissions from the power sector can be lowered through tighter coupling of buildings, mobility, and electricity supply.
  • End users, grid operators, and market participants all gain from coordinated flexibility programs rather than competing approaches.
  • New control technologies and business models become viable once social acceptance and economic signals are aligned with technical requirements.
  • Future research and practice must shift from isolated advances in any single domain to joint development across social, economic, and engineering fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Control engineers could embed simplified models of user behavior drawn from social studies directly into real-time optimization routines for demand response.
  • Electricity market rules might be redesigned to reward coordinated flexibility offers that reflect both grid physics and household preferences at the same time.
  • Pilot projects testing the full abstraction in one city could expose coordination costs or data-sharing barriers that the review leaves implicit.
  • If the framework holds, long-term system planning tools would need to treat social acceptance metrics as hard constraints alongside capacity and cost.

Load-bearing premise

The reviewed literature and the proposed abstraction of interconnections are sufficient to guide practical implementation without further empirical validation of how the social, economic, and technical elements interact in real settings.

What would settle it

A field trial that applies the proposed bidirectional flows and coordinated decision-making but produces no measurable gain in renewable integration, flexibility utilization, or stakeholder benefits compared with conventional siloed methods would falsify the central claim.

read the original abstract

Harnessing the demand-side flexibility in building and mobility sectors can help to better integrate renewable energy into power systems and reduce global CO2 emissions. Enabling this sector coupling can be achieved with advances in energy management, business models, control technologies, and power grids. The study of demand-side flexibility extends beyond engineering, spanning social science, economics, and power and control systems, which present both challenges and opportunities to researchers and engineers in these fields. This Review outlines recent trends and studies in social, economic, and technological advancements in power systems that leverage demand-side flexibility. We first provide a concept of a socio-techno-economic system with an abstraction of end-users, building and mobility sectors, control systems, electricity markets, and power grids. We discuss the interconnections between these elements, highlighting the importance of bidirectional flows of information and coordinated decision-making. We then emphasize that fully realizing demand-side flexibility necessitates deep integration across stakeholders and systems, moving beyond siloed approaches. Finally, we discuss the future directions in renewable-based power systems and control engineering to address key challenges from both research and practitioners' perspectives. A holistic approach for identifying, measuring, and utilizing demand-side flexibility is key to successfully maximizing its multi-stakeholder benefits but requires further transdisciplinary collaboration and commercially viable solutions for broader implementation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review synthesizing trends across social, economic, and technological domains for harnessing demand-side flexibility in building and mobility sectors to integrate renewables into power systems. It introduces a conceptual socio-techno-economic system abstraction encompassing end-users, sectors, control systems, electricity markets, and power grids; discusses interconnections with emphasis on bidirectional information flows and coordinated decision-making; argues for moving beyond siloed approaches via deep stakeholder integration; and outlines future directions in renewable-based systems and control engineering, concluding that a holistic approach to identifying, measuring, and utilizing flexibility is essential for multi-stakeholder benefits but requires further transdisciplinary collaboration and commercially viable solutions.

Significance. If the literature synthesis is representative, the paper provides a useful framing for researchers and practitioners by highlighting interconnections across domains and the limitations of isolated technical solutions. It explicitly credits the need for additional empirical work and commercial development, which lends balance. As a perspective review without new derivations, data, or proofs, its primary value is in organizing existing knowledge and pointing to transdisciplinary gaps rather than delivering immediately actionable quantitative insights.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and introduction: The scope of the literature review (e.g., search methodology, time frame, or key databases) is not stated, which would help readers assess completeness of the synthesis on social, economic, and technical trends.
  2. [socio-techno-economic system concept] Section introducing the socio-techno-economic system concept: The abstraction of bidirectional information flows and coordinated decision-making is presented at a high level; adding one or two concrete examples drawn from the cited literature (e.g., specific market mechanisms or control protocols) would strengthen readability for a multi-disciplinary audience.
  3. [future directions] Future directions section: Several recommendations for control engineering and power grids remain general; referencing specific ongoing standards, testbeds, or recent pilot projects would make the practitioner-oriented suggestions more actionable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our review paper on the socio-techno-economic framework for demand-side flexibility. The summary accurately captures the manuscript's scope, structure, and emphasis on transdisciplinary integration. We are encouraged by the recognition of its value in organizing existing knowledge and identifying gaps, and we accept the recommendation for minor revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: literature review with no derivations or predictions

full rationale

This paper is a synthesis of trends across social, economic, and technical literature on demand-side flexibility. It offers conceptual abstractions and interconnections drawn from existing studies, without any equations, fitted parameters, quantitative predictions, or first-principles derivations. The central claim is a perspective statement calling for holistic approaches and further transdisciplinary work, with no load-bearing steps that reduce to self-definition, self-citation chains, or renamed inputs. All elements are externally referenced to prior work rather than internally constructed.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper that introduces an abstraction of a socio-techno-economic system but provides no new mathematical derivations, data fits, or postulated physical entities; all content rests on prior literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5588 in / 1052 out tokens · 23127 ms · 2026-05-10T17:54:55.164334+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

181 extracted references · 181 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Global energy perspective 2023: Power outlook (2023)

    McKinsey & Company. Global energy perspective 2023: Power outlook (2023). https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/oil-and-gas/our-insights/global-energy-perspective-2023-power- outlook

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Global energy transformation: a roadmap to 2050 (2018)

    International Renewable Energy Agency. Global energy transformation: a roadmap to 2050 (2018). https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2018/Apr/IRENA Report GET 2018.pdf

    work page 2050

  3. [3]

    L.et al.A new definition and research agenda for demand response in the distributed energy resource era.IEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation(2025)

    Mathieu, J. L.et al.A new definition and research agenda for demand response in the distributed energy resource era.IEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation(2025)

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Callaway, D. S. & Hiskens, I. A. Achieving controllability of electric loads.Proceedings of the IEEE99, 184–199 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Extended world energy balances (2023)

    International Energy Agency. Extended world energy balances (2023). https://doi.org/10.1787/8624f431-en

    work page doi:10.1787/8624f431-en 2023

  6. [6]

    C.et al.A comprehensive dataset for global, regional and national greenhouse gas emissions by sector 1970–2019.Earth System Science Data Discussions2021, 1–63 (2021)

    Minx, J. C.et al.A comprehensive dataset for global, regional and national greenhouse gas emissions by sector 1970–2019.Earth System Science Data Discussions2021, 1–63 (2021)

    work page 1970

  7. [7]

    van Heerden, R.et al.Demand-side strategies enable rapid and deep cuts in buildings and transport emissions to 2050.Nature Energy1–15 (2025)

    work page 2050

  8. [8]

    Langevin, J.et al.Demand-side solutions in the US building sector could achieve deep emissions reductions and avoid over$100 billion in power sector costs.One Earth6, 1005–1031 (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Transactive control for connected homes and neighbourhoods.Nature Energy3, 907–909 (2018)

    Wang, N. Transactive control for connected homes and neighbourhoods.Nature Energy3, 907–909 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Demand-Side Flexibility in the EU: Quantification of benefits in 2030 (2022)

    DNV. Demand-Side Flexibility in the EU: Quantification of benefits in 2030 (2022). https://smarten.eu/wp- content/uploads/2022/10/SmartEN-DSF-benefits-2030-Report DIGITAL-1.pdf

    work page 2030

  11. [11]

    Progress in Energy2, 042001 (2020)

    Strbac, G.et al.Role and value of flexibility in facilitating cost-effective energy system decarbonisation. Progress in Energy2, 042001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Nature communications15, 280 (2024)

    Liu, R.et al.A cross-scale framework for evaluating flexibility values of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles. Nature communications15, 280 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    C., Moura, S

    Xu, Y., C ¸ olak, S., Kara, E. C., Moura, S. J. & Gonz´ alez, M. C. Planning for electric vehicle needs by coupling charging profiles with urban mobility.Nature Energy3, 484–493 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    V., Min, L., Azevedo, I

    Powell, S., Cezar, G. V., Min, L., Azevedo, I. M. & Rajagopal, R. Charging infrastructure access and operation to reduce the grid impacts of deep electric vehicle adoption.Nature Energy7, 932–945 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    & Moura, S

    Zhang, H., Hu, X., Hu, Z. & Moura, S. J. Sustainable plug-in electric vehicle integration into power systems. Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering1, 35–52 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    & Yan, J

    Liu, Z., Chen, Y., Yang, X. & Yan, J. Power to heat: Opportunity of flexibility services provided by building energy systems.Advances in Applied Energy100149 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    & Reyna, J

    Jackson, R., Zhou, E. & Reyna, J. Building and grid system benefits of demand flexibility and energy efficiency. Joule5, 1927–1930 (2021)

    work page 1927

  18. [18]

    M., Aneli, S

    Tina, G. M., Aneli, S. & Gagliano, A. Technical and economic analysis of the provision of ancillary services through the flexibility of hvac system in shopping centers.Energy258, 124860 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Kleinebrahm, M.et al.Two million European single-family homes could abandon the grid by 2050.Joule7, 2485–2510 (2023)

    work page 2050

  20. [20]

    & Piette, M

    Li, H., Wang, Z., Hong, T. & Piette, M. A. Energy flexibility of residential buildings: A systematic review of characterization and quantification methods and applications.Advances in Applied Energy3, 100054 (2021). 16

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    L., Price, P

    Mathieu, J. L., Price, P. N., Kiliccote, S. & Piette, M. A. Quantifying changes in building electricity use, with application to demand response.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid2, 507–518 (2011)

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    World energy outlook 2023 (2023)

    International Energy Agency. World energy outlook 2023 (2023). https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy- outlook-2023

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Ostergaard, J.et al.Energy security through demand-side flexibility: the case of denmark.IEEE Power and Energy Magazine19, 46–55 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    & Strbac, G

    O’Malley, C., Badesa, L., Teng, F. & Strbac, G. Frequency response from aggregated V2G chargers with uncertain EV connections.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems38, 3543–3556 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    & Djapic, P

    Strbac, G., Pudjianto, D. & Djapic, P. Market framework for distributed energy resources-based network services. Tech. Rep., Imperial College London (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    & Strbac, G

    Matamala, C., Badesa, L., Moreno, R. & Strbac, G. Cost allocation for inertia and frequency response ancillary services.IEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation2, 2771–9626 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Remote control of electricity supplies to the domestic consumer.Electronics and Power11, 98 (1965)

    Buckingham, G. Remote control of electricity supplies to the domestic consumer.Electronics and Power11, 98 (1965)

    work page 1965

  28. [28]

    A., Lokken, G

    Abdoo, R. A., Lokken, G. & Bischke, R. F. Load management implementation: decisions, opportunities and operation.IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and SystemsP AS-101, 3902–3906 (1982)

    work page 1982

  29. [29]

    Delgado, R. M. Demand-side management alternatives.Proceedings of the IEEE73, 1471–1488 (1985)

    work page 1985

  30. [30]

    W., Krupa, T

    Davis, M. W., Krupa, T. J. & Diedzic, M. J. The economics of direct control of residential loads on the design and operation of the distribution system: Part I: Design of experiment.IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and SystemsP AS-102, 646–653 (1983)

    work page 1983

  31. [31]

    Schweppe, F. C. Power systems ‘2000’: hierarchical control strategies.IEEE Spectrum15, 42–47 (1978)

    work page 2000

  32. [32]

    Commission Recommendation of 9 March 2012 on preparations for the roll-out of smart metering systems (2012)

    European Commission. Commission Recommendation of 9 March 2012 on preparations for the roll-out of smart metering systems (2012). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reco/2012/148/oj/eng

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    European Commission. Commission Regulation (EU) No 543/2013 of 14 June 2013 on submis- sion and publication of data in electricity markets and amending Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council Text with EEA relevance (2013). https://eur- lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2013/543/oj/eng

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    & Patel, M

    Yilmaz, S., Weber, S. & Patel, M. K. Who is sensitive to DSM? Understanding the determinants of the shape of electricity load curves and demand shifting: Socio-demographic characteristics, appliance use and attitudes. Energy Policy133, 110909 (2019)

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    Adams, S.et al.Social license to automate: A critical review of emerging approaches to electricity demand management.Energy Research & Social Science80, 102210 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Rinaldi, A., Yilmaz, S., Patel, M. K. & Parra, D. What adds more flexibility? An energy system analy- sis of storage, demand-side response, heating electrification, and distribution reinforcement.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews167, 112696 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Architecture of power markets.Econometrica70, 1299–1340 (2002)

    Wilson, R. Architecture of power markets.Econometrica70, 1299–1340 (2002)

    work page 2002

  38. [38]

    Joskow, P. L. Lessons learned from electricity market liberalization.The Energy Journal29, 9–42 (2008)

    work page 2008

  39. [39]

    & Dietrich, D

    Palensky, P. & Dietrich, D. Demand side management: Demand response, intelligent energy systems, and smart loads.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics7, 381–388 (2011)

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    & Matos, M

    Villar, J., Bessa, R. & Matos, M. Flexibility products and markets: Literature review.Electric Power Systems Research154, 329–340 (2018). 17

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    M´ egel, O., Mathieu, J. L. & Andersson, G. Scheduling distributed energy storage units to provide multiple services under forecast error.International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems72, 48–57 (2015)

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    & Mancarella, P

    Wang, H., Riaz, S. & Mancarella, P. Integrated techno-economic modeling, flexibility analysis, and business case assessment of an urban virtual power plant with multi-market co-optimization.Applied Energy259, 114142 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    Should it be automatic or manual—the occupant’s perspective on the design of domestic control systems.Energy and Buildings65, 119–126 (2013)

    Karjalainen, S. Should it be automatic or manual—the occupant’s perspective on the design of domestic control systems.Energy and Buildings65, 119–126 (2013)

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    Greening, L. A. Demand response resources: Who is responsible for implementation in a deregulated market? Energy35, 1518–1525 (2010)

    work page 2010

  45. [45]

    Good, N., Ellis, K. A. & Mancarella, P. Review and classification of barriers and enablers of demand response in the smart grid.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews72, 57–72 (2017)

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    R., Hobman, E

    Stenner, K., Frederiks, E. R., Hobman, E. V. & Cook, S. Willingness to participate in direct load control: The role of consumer distrust.Applied Energy189, 76–88 (2017)

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    L., Kuch, D., Winzer, C., Patel, M

    Michellod, J. L., Kuch, D., Winzer, C., Patel, M. K. & Yilmaz, S. Building social license for automated demand-side management — Case study research in the swiss residential sector.Energies15, 7759 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Artificial Intelligence Act (2024)

    European Parliament. Artificial Intelligence Act (2024). URL https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ TXT/?uri=EP%3AP9 TA%282024%290138

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Digitalization and energy (2017)

    International Energy Agency. Digitalization and energy (2017). https://www.iea.org/reports/digitalisation- and-energy

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    Nagy, Z.et al.Ten questions concerning occupant-centric control and operations.Building and Environment 242, 110518 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Reynders, G.et al.Energy flexible buildings: An evaluation of definitions and quantification methodologies applied to thermal storage.Energy and Buildings166, 372–390 (2018)

    work page 2018

  52. [52]

    Hewitt, N. J. Heat pumps and energy storage – The challenges of implementation.Applied Energy89, 37–44 (2012)

    work page 2012

  53. [53]

    Engineering16, 123–140 (2022)

    Luo, Z.et al.Demand flexibility of residential buildings: Definitions, flexible loads, and quantification methods. Engineering16, 123–140 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    & Morari, M

    Oldewurtel, F., Ulbig, A., Parisio, A., Andersson, G. & Morari, M. Reducing peak electricity demand in building climate control using real-time pricing and model predictive control.49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control1927–1932 (2010)

    work page 1932

  55. [55]

    & Heiselberg, P

    Le Dr´ eau, J. & Heiselberg, P. Energy flexibility of residential buildings using short term heat storage in the thermal mass.Energy111, 991–1002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  56. [56]

    D’hulst, R.et al.Demand response flexibility and flexibility potential of residential smart appliances: Experiences from large pilot test in Belgium.Applied Energy155, 79–90 (2015)

    work page 2015

  57. [57]

    & Norford, L

    Kim, Y.-J., Fuentes, E. & Norford, L. K. Experimental study of grid frequency regulation ancillary service of a variable speed heat pump.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems31, 3090–3099 (2016)

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    A., Rhodes, J

    Hurtado, L. A., Rhodes, J. D., Nguyen, P. H., Kamphuis, I. G. & Webber, M. E. Quantifying demand flexibility based on structural thermal storage and comfort management of non-residential buildings: A comparison between hot and cold climate zones.Applied Energy195, 1047–1054 (2017)

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    & Polonara, F

    Arteconi, A., Mugnini, A. & Polonara, F. Energy flexible buildings: A methodology for rating the flexibility performance of buildings with electric heating and cooling systems.Applied Energy251, 113387 (2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    & Bindner, H

    Ziras, C., Heinrich, C. & Bindner, H. W. Why baselines are not suited for local flexibility markets.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews135, 110357 (2021). 18

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    & Wang, S

    Tang, H. & Wang, S. Energy flexibility quantification of grid-responsive buildings: Energy flexibility index and assessment of their effectiveness for applications.Energy221, 119756 (2021)

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    & Fleten, S.-E

    Ødegaard Ottesen, S., Tomasgard, A. & Fleten, S.-E. Prosumer bidding and scheduling in electricity markets. Energy94, 828–843 (2016)

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    G.et al.Characterizing the energy flexibility of buildings and districts.Applied Energy225, 175–182 (2018)

    Junker, R. G.et al.Characterizing the energy flexibility of buildings and districts.Applied Energy225, 175–182 (2018)

    work page 2018

  64. [64]

    B., Burke, D

    Anwar, M. B., Burke, D. J. & O’Malley, M. J. A multi-perspective model for evaluation of residential thermal demand response.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid10, 6214–6227 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    & Vraneˇ s, S

    Bati´ c, M., Tomaˇ sevi´ c, N., Beccuti, G., Demiray, T. & Vraneˇ s, S. Combined energy hub optimisation and demand side management for buildings.Energy and Buildings127, 229 – 241 (2016)

    work page 2016

  66. [66]

    Patteeuw, D., Henze, G. P. & Helsen, L. Comparison of load shifting incentives for low-energy buildings with heat pumps to attain grid flexibility benefits.Applied Energy167, 80 – 92 (2016)

    work page 2016

  67. [67]

    & Tomaˇ sevi´ c, N

    Jeli´ c, M., Bati´ c, M. & Tomaˇ sevi´ c, N. Demand-side flexibility impact on prosumer energy system planning. Energies14, 7076 (2021)

    work page 2021

  68. [68]

    Patteeuw, D.et al.CO2-abatement cost of residential heat pumps with active demand response: demand- and supply-side effects.Applied Energy156, 490–501 (2015)

    work page 2015

  69. [69]

    B., Sun, Y., Lin, W

    Awan, M. B., Sun, Y., Lin, W. & Ma, Z. A framework to formulate and aggregate performance indicators to quantify building energy flexibility.Applied Energy349, 121590 (2023)

    work page 2023

  70. [70]

    & Pye, S

    Li, P.-H. & Pye, S. Assessing the benefits of demand-side flexibility in residential and transport sectors from an integrated energy systems perspective.Applied Energy228, 965–979 (2018)

    work page 2018

  71. [71]

    Reis, I. F. G., Gon¸ calves, I., Lopes, M. A. R. & Antunes, C. H. Residential demand-side flexibility in energy communities: a combination of optimization and agent modeling approaches.International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies1–6 (2019)

    work page 2019

  72. [72]

    & Fell, M

    Powells, G. & Fell, M. J. Flexibility capital and flexibility justice in smart energy systems.Energy Research & Social Science54, 56–59 (2019)

    work page 2019

  73. [73]

    & Zhao, Y

    Aduda, K., Labeodan, T., Zeiler, W., Boxem, G. & Zhao, Y. Demand side flexibility: Potentials and building performance implications.Sustainable Cities and Society22, 146–163 (2016)

    work page 2016

  74. [74]

    & Howard, B

    El Geneidy, R. & Howard, B. Contracted energy flexibility characteristics of communities: Analysis of a control strategy for demand response.Applied Energy263, 114600 (2020)

    work page 2020

  75. [75]

    & Darby, S

    McKenna, E., Higginson, S., Grunewald, P. & Darby, S. J. Simulating residential demand response: Improving socio-technical assumptions in activity-based models of energy demand.Energy Efficiency11, 1583–1597 (2018)

    work page 2018

  76. [76]

    Bergaentzl´ e, C.et al.A transition perspective on demand-side flexibility in the integrated energy system. Tech. Rep., Technical University of Denmark (2021)

    work page 2021

  77. [77]

    & Gr¨ unewald, P

    Gleue, M., Unterberg, J., L¨ oschel, A. & Gr¨ unewald, P. Does demand-side flexibility reduce emissions? Exploring the social acceptability of demand management in Germany and Great Britain.Energy Research & Social Science82, 102290 (2021)

    work page 2021

  78. [78]

    & Weyant, J

    Kim, Y., Eom, J., Yoo, S. & Weyant, J. Unlocking demand-side flexibility for reliable energy systems: The impact of information support on household search for load shifting under dynamic pricing. Working Paper 2020-006, KAIST College of Business (2020). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3632513

    work page 2020

  79. [79]

    Michaelis, J.et al.Comparison of the techno-economic characteristics of different flexibility options in the european energy system.14th International Conference on the European Energy Market1–5 (2017). 19

    work page 2017

  80. [80]

    & Svento, R

    Ruokamo, E., Kopsakangas-Savolainen, M., Meril¨ ainen, T. & Svento, R. Towards flexible energy demand – Preferences for dynamic contracts, services and emissions reductions.Energy Economics84, 104522 (2019)

    work page 2019

Showing first 80 references.