pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07865 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 🧮 math-ph · math.MP

A unified 4D phase-space framework for two-level quantum dynamics: open-source library

O. Morandi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math-ph math.MP
keywords two-level quantum systemsWigner-Weyl formulation4D phase spacespectral splittingnumerical simulationquantum dynamicsopen-source librarynanomaterials
0
0 comments X

The pith

A spectral splitting scheme in 4D phase space simulates two-level quantum dynamics independently of the physical system.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a numerical method for the quantum dynamics of two-level systems such as spins or two-band electrons, expressed in a 4D phase-space picture via the Wigner formulation. A spectral splitting technique is applied to the integro-differential Wigner-Weyl equation to produce the time evolution. The resulting computational structure does not change when the underlying physical model changes, so the same code can address nanomaterials, cold atoms, interacting gases, spintronics, and topological superconductors. A sympathetic reader would care because this removes the need to rebuild numerical tools for each new two-level realization.

Core claim

We present a numerical scheme for simulating the 2D quantum dynamics of a two-level particle gas with internal degrees of freedom. We adopt the Wigner formulation consisting of a 4D phase-space representation. The scheme is based on a spectral splitting method applied to the integro-differential Wigner-Weyl formulation. The computational architecture is independent of specific physical implementations, resulting in broad applicability. We illustrate the versatility by simulating dynamical systems relevant to nanomaterials science, cold atom physics, interacting gases, spintronics, and topological superconductors.

What carries the argument

Spectral splitting method applied to the integro-differential Wigner-Weyl equation, which produces stable time stepping in the 4D phase-space representation of two-level dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The spectral splitting applied to the integro-differential Wigner-Weyl equation preserves accuracy and stability for the full range of two-level systems without introducing uncontrolled numerical artifacts or requiring system-specific tuning.

What would settle it

A direct numerical comparison between the scheme and an exactly solvable two-level model (for example, a constant-field Rabi oscillation) that shows growing phase or amplitude errors beyond expected truncation levels would falsify the claim of reliable, untuned accuracy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07865 by O. Morandi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Movie (YouTube). Double slit experiment. The panels correspond to the times [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left panel: Representation of the uniform magnetic field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Movie (YouTube). Evolution of the momentum distribution for the spin up (left [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Movie (YouTube). Atom transported by along a circle by the optical tweezer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Movie (YouTube). Dipole-dipole interaction between two neutral atoms. Evolution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Band structure and eigenvector direction on the Bloch sphere. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Representation of the Bloch sphere topology of the BdG Hamiltonian. The plot [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Illustration of the Klein tunneling mechanism. The meshed surface depicts the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Movie (YouTube). Evolution of the two band Wigner function. In each panel, the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Movie (YouTube). Evolution of the two-band Wigner function. In each panel, the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison of the evolution of the total density in the conduction band, varying [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a numerical scheme for simulating the 2D quantum dynamics of a two-level particle gas with internal degrees of freedom such as spin, pseudo-spin, or a two-band electronic structure. We adopt the Wigner formulation of quantum mechanics consisting of a 4D phase-space representation of the quantum dynamics. The numerical scheme is based on a spectral splitting method applied to the integro-differential Wigner-Weyl formulation of the dynamics. The computational architecture of our method is independent of specific physical implementations, resulting in broad applicability. We illustrate the versatility of our approach by simulating dynamical systems relevant to nanomaterials science, cold atom physics, interacting gases, spintronics, and topological superconductors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a numerical scheme for simulating 2D quantum dynamics of two-level particle gases in a 4D phase-space Wigner-Weyl formulation. It applies a spectral splitting method to the resulting integro-differential equation, claims that the computational architecture is independent of specific physical implementations, and illustrates the approach with examples from nanomaterials science, cold atom physics, interacting gases, spintronics, and topological superconductors. An open-source library is provided to support the framework.

Significance. If the spectral splitting method can be shown to be stable and accurate without system-specific tuning, the work could supply a general, reusable computational architecture for phase-space simulations of two-level systems across multiple domains. The open-source library is a concrete strength that would support reproducibility and broader adoption.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that a spectral splitting method is applied to the integro-differential Wigner-Weyl equation is stated without any derivation, stability analysis, or error bounds, rendering the central numerical claims unverifiable from the text.
  2. [Numerical scheme] Numerical scheme description: the assertion of broad applicability independent of physical implementations rests on the untested assumption that the splitting of the non-local potential term preserves accuracy and stability for arbitrary two-level Hamiltonians; the illustrations do not include parameter sweeps or tests for sharp momentum dependence (e.g., lattice potentials), leaving the generality unproven.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Results] The manuscript would benefit from explicit comparison of the 4D phase-space results against established methods (e.g., direct Schrödinger evolution) for at least one benchmark case.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and recommendation for major revision. We address each major comment point by point below, providing the strongest honest defense of the manuscript while incorporating revisions where the comments identify verifiable gaps.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that a spectral splitting method is applied to the integro-differential Wigner-Weyl equation is stated without any derivation, stability analysis, or error bounds, rendering the central numerical claims unverifiable from the text.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract is too concise to include these elements. The manuscript body (Sections 2 and 3) derives the 4D Wigner-Weyl equation for two-level systems and applies the spectral splitting to the resulting integro-differential equation. In the revised version we add a new subsection that explicitly walks through the splitting steps, presents a linear stability analysis under the assumption of bounded potentials, and reports numerical convergence rates from the existing examples. Full analytical error bounds for arbitrary non-local terms remain technically demanding and are not supplied; instead we strengthen the text with additional convergence plots that allow verification of the central claims from the revised manuscript. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Numerical scheme] Numerical scheme description: the assertion of broad applicability independent of physical implementations rests on the untested assumption that the splitting of the non-local potential term preserves accuracy and stability for arbitrary two-level Hamiltonians; the illustrations do not include parameter sweeps or tests for sharp momentum dependence (e.g., lattice potentials), leaving the generality unproven.

    Authors: The five physical domains already exercise qualitatively different Hamiltonian structures (local vs. non-local, smooth vs. rapidly varying), which supports the claim that the splitting architecture itself does not embed system-specific tuning. We nevertheless accept that systematic sweeps and sharp-momentum tests are absent. The revised manuscript adds (i) a parameter sweep over interaction strength in the interacting-gas example and (ii) a new cold-atom simulation employing a periodic lattice potential with sharp momentum components. These additions demonstrate that accuracy and stability are retained without retuning the splitter, thereby providing concrete evidence for the asserted generality. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Numerical scheme derived from Wigner-Weyl equation without self-referential reductions

full rationale

The paper presents a spectral splitting numerical method for the 4D phase-space Wigner formulation of two-level quantum dynamics. The central claim of broad applicability follows directly from the stated independence of the computational architecture from specific physical implementations, as described in the abstract. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its inputs: there are no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, no self-definitional equations, and no uniqueness theorems or ansatzes imported via self-citation that would force the result. The method is applied to the integro-differential equation in a general manner, with illustrations serving as demonstrations rather than circular validations. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the underlying integro-differential formulation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract supplies almost no explicit axioms or parameters. The method implicitly assumes that the Wigner-Weyl transform remains valid for the chosen two-level systems and that spectral splitting converges for the integro-differential operator.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Wigner-Weyl formulation accurately represents the quantum dynamics of two-level systems in 4D phase space.
    Stated in the opening sentence of the abstract as the adopted framework.
  • ad hoc to paper Spectral splitting can be applied stably to the integro-differential Wigner equation without system-specific modifications.
    Core of the numerical scheme described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5407 in / 1392 out tokens · 46317 ms · 2026-05-10T18:13:58.417348+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 115 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wigner, On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium, Physical Review, 40, 749–759 (1932)

    E. Wigner, On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium, Physical Review, 40, 749–759 (1932)

    work page 1932

  2. [2]

    P. A. Markowich, On the equivalence of the Schr¨ odinger and the quantum Liouville equations, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 11, 459 (1989)

    work page 1989

  3. [3]

    P. A. Markowich and C. A. Ringhofer, An analysis of the quantum Liouville equation, Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 69, 5675 (1989)

    work page 1989

  4. [4]

    G´ erard, Comm

    P. G´ erard, Comm. Part. Diff. Equations, 16, 1761 (1991)

    work page 1991

  5. [5]

    P. L. Lions and T. Paul, Sur les mesures de Wigner, Revista Matematica Iberoamericana, 9-3, 553 (1993)

    work page 1993

  6. [6]

    Sparber, P

    C. Sparber, P. Markowich, and N. Mauser, Wigner functions versus WKB-methods in multivalued geometrical optics, Asymptot. Anal., 33, 153 (2003)

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    Pulvirenti, Semiclassical expansion of Wigner functions, J

    M. Pulvirenti, Semiclassical expansion of Wigner functions, J. Math. Phys., 47, 052103 (2006)

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    O. Gat, M. Lein, and S. Teufel, Semiclassics for Particles with Spin via a Wigner-Weyl- Type Calculus, Ann. Henri Poincar´ e, 15, 1967 (2014)

    work page 1967

  9. [9]

    Figalli, C

    A. Figalli, C. Klein, P. Markowich, and C. Sparber, WKB Analysis of Bohmian Dynam- ics, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 67, 581 (2014)

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Morandi, Deterministic classical limit of the optimal control problem of quantum particles with spin, arXiv:2510.24462 (2026)

    O. Morandi, Deterministic classical limit of the optimal control problem of quantum particles with spin, arXiv:2510.24462 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  11. [11]

    Morandi, Wigner dynamics and limit of geometrical optics in inhomogeneous disper- sive media, Kinetic and Related Models, 18, 76 (2025)

    O. Morandi, Wigner dynamics and limit of geometrical optics in inhomogeneous disper- sive media, Kinetic and Related Models, 18, 76 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    E. J. Heller, Wigner phase space method: Analysis for semiclassical applications, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 65, 1289 (1976)

    work page 1976

  13. [13]

    V. I. Tatarskii, The Wigner representation of quantum mechanics, Physics-Uspekhi, 26, 311–327 (1983)

    work page 1983

  14. [14]

    Lee, Theory and application of the quantum phase-space distribution functions, Physics Reports, 259, 147 (1995)

    H.-W. Lee, Theory and application of the quantum phase-space distribution functions, Physics Reports, 259, 147 (1995)

    work page 1995

  15. [15]

    Shabtay, D

    G. Shabtay, D. Mendlovic, and Z. Zalevsky, Appl. Opt., 37, 2 (1998)

    work page 1998

  16. [16]

    W. P. Schleich, Quantum Optics in Phase Space, Wiley-VCH Verlag Berlin GmbH (2001). 26DIMAI Florence REFERENCES REFERENCES

    work page 2001

  17. [17]

    C. K. Zachos, D. B. Fairlie, and T. L. Curtright (eds.), Quantum mechanics in phase space. An overview with selected papers, World Scientific Publishing, Hackensack NJ (2005)

    work page 2005

  18. [18]

    W. B. Case, Wigner functions and Weyl transforms for pedestrians, American Journal of Physics, 76, 937–946 (2008)

    work page 2008

  19. [19]

    Polkovnikov, Phase space representation of quantum dynamics, Annals of Physics, 325, 1852 (2010)

    A. Polkovnikov, Phase space representation of quantum dynamics, Annals of Physics, 325, 1852 (2010)

    work page 2010

  20. [20]

    De Gosson, The Wigner Transform, World Scientific Publishing Company (2017)

    M. De Gosson, The Wigner Transform, World Scientific Publishing Company (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Bordone, M

    P. Bordone, M. Pascoli, R. Brunetti, A. Bertoni, C. Jacoboni, and A. Abramo, Phys. Rev. B, 59, 3060 (1999)

    work page 1999

  22. [22]

    Demeio, L

    L. Demeio, L. Barletti, A. Bertoni, P. Bordone, and C. Jacoboni, Multi-band Wigner function, Physica B, 314, 104–107 (2002)

    work page 2002

  23. [23]

    M. B. Unlu, B. Rosen, H.-L. Cui, and P. Zhao, Multi-band Wigner function formulation of quantum transport, Physics Letters A, 327, 230 (2004)

    work page 2004

  24. [24]

    Sverdlov, A

    V. Sverdlov, A. Gehring, H. Kosina, and S. Selberherr, Quantum transport in ultra-scaled double-gate MOSFETs: A Wigner function-based Monte Carlo approach, Solid-State Electronics, 49, 1510 (2005)

    work page 2005

  25. [25]

    Revzen, The Wigner Function as Distribution Function, Foundations of Physics, 36, 4 (2006)

    M. Revzen, The Wigner Function as Distribution Function, Foundations of Physics, 36, 4 (2006)

    work page 2006

  26. [26]

    J. Zhu, P. Ji, and N. Lu, Quantum correction to Landau damping of electron plasma waves, Phys. Plasmas, 16, 032105 (2009)

    work page 2009

  27. [27]

    Weinbub and D

    J. Weinbub and D. K. Ferry, Recent advances in Wigner function approaches, Appl. Phys. Rev., 5, 041104 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    V. D. Camiola, G. Mascali, and V. Romano, Quantum energy-transport and drift- diffusion models for electron transport in graphene: an approach by the Wigner function, Journal of Computational Electronics, 20 (S1) (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    W. Wen, S. Popov, Z. Liu, D. Han, and X. Chu, Designing a self-accelerating beam by Wigner transform, Results in Physics, 34, 105288 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Dragoman, Applications of the Wigner distribution function in signal processing, EURASIP J

    D. Dragoman, Applications of the Wigner distribution function in signal processing, EURASIP J. Appl. Signal Process., 2005, 1520 (2005)

    work page 2005

  31. [31]

    Ringhofer, A spectral method for the numerical simulation of quantum tunneling phenomena, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 27, 32–50 (1990)

    C. Ringhofer, A spectral method for the numerical simulation of quantum tunneling phenomena, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 27, 32–50 (1990)

    work page 1990

  32. [32]

    W. R. Frensley, Wigner-function model of a resonant-tunneling semiconductor-device, Phys. Rev. B, 36, 1570–1580 (1987)

    work page 1987

  33. [33]

    Ravaioli, M

    U. Ravaioli, M. A. Osman, W. P¨ otz, N. C. Kluksdahl, and D. K. Ferry, Investigation of ballistic transport through resonant-tunneling quantum wells using the Wigner function approach, Physica B + C, 134B, 36–40 (1985). 27DIMAI Florence REFERENCES REFERENCES

    work page 1985

  34. [34]

    Arnold and C

    A. Arnold and C. Ringhofer, An operator splitting method for the Wigner-Poisson prob- lem, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 33, 1622–1643 (1996)

    work page 1996

  35. [35]

    N. C. Kluksdahl, A. M. Kriman, D. K. Ferry, and C. Ringhofer, Self-consistent study of the resonant-tunneling diode, Phys. Rev. B, 39, 7720–7735 (1989)

    work page 1989

  36. [36]

    F. A. Buot and K. L. Jensen, Phys. Rev. B, 42, 19 (1990)

    work page 1990

  37. [37]

    F. A. Buot, P. Zhao, H. L. Cui, L. Woolard, and C. M. Krowne, Emitter quantization and double hysteresis in resonant-tunneling structures: A nonlinear model of charge oscillation and current bistability, Phys. Rev. B, 61, 8 (2000)

    work page 2000

  38. [38]

    Shifren, C

    L. Shifren, C. Ringhofer, and D. K. Ferry, Wigner Function-Based Quantum Ensemble Monte Carlo Study of a Resonant Tunneling Diode, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 50, 769A (2003)

    work page 2003

  39. [39]

    Dorda and F

    A. Dorda and F. Sch¨ urrer, A WENO-solver combined with adaptive momentum dis- cretization for the Wigner transport equation and its application to resonant tunneling diodes, Journal of Computational Physics, 284, 95–116 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    Nedjalkov, D

    M. Nedjalkov, D. Querlioz, P. Dollfus, and H. Kosina, Wigner function approach, in Nano-Electronic Devices, Springer, 289–358 (2011)

    work page 2011

  41. [41]

    Muscato and W

    O. Muscato and W. Wagner, A class of stochastic algorithms for the Wigner equation, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 38, 1483 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    Dimov, M

    I. Dimov, M. Nedjalkov, J.-M. Sellier, and S. Selberherr, Boundary conditions and the Wigner equation solution, Journal of Computational Electronics, 14, 859–863 (2015)

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    J. M. Sellier, M. Nedjalkov, and I. Dimov, An introduction to applied quantum mechanics in the Wigner Monte Carlo formalism, Physics Reports, 577, 1–34 (2015)

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    Weinbub, M

    J. Weinbub, M. Ballicchia, and M. Nedjalkov, Gate-controlled electron quantum inter- ference logic, Nanoscale, 14, 13520 (2022)

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    Jacoboni, A

    C. Jacoboni, A. Bertoni, P. Bordone, and R. Brunetti, Wigner-function formulation for quantum transport in semiconductors: theory and Monte Carlo approach, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 55, 67–78 (2001)

    work page 2001

  46. [46]

    Jacoboni and P

    C. Jacoboni and P. Bordone, The Wigner-function approach to non-equilibrium electron transport, Reports on Progress in Physics, 67, 1033–1071 (2004)

    work page 2004

  47. [47]

    M. J. Bastiaans, The Wigner distribution function applied to optical signals and systems, Opt. Commun., 25, 26 (1978)

    work page 1978

  48. [48]

    H. M. Wiseman, Quantum trajectories and quantum measurement theory, Quantum and Semiclassical Optics, 8, 205–222 (1996)

    work page 1996

  49. [49]

    Dittrich, C

    T. Dittrich, C. Viviescas, and L. Sandoval, Semiclassical Propagator of the Wigner Func- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 070403 (2006)

    work page 2006

  50. [50]

    Zhang and M

    Z. Zhang and M. Levoy, Wigner distributions and how they relate to the light field, IEEE ICCP 09, 5559007 (2009). 28DIMAI Florence REFERENCES REFERENCES

    work page 2009

  51. [51]

    Cuypers et al., Validity of Wigner distribution function for ray-based imaging, Proc

    T. Cuypers et al., Validity of Wigner distribution function for ray-based imaging, Proc. IEEE ICCP, 1 (2011)

    work page 2011

  52. [52]

    M. A. Alonso, Wigner functions in optics: describing beams as ray bundles and pulses as particle ensembles, Advances in Optics and Photonics, 3, 272 (2011)

    work page 2011

  53. [53]

    K. Sun, T. Jin, and D. Yang, An improved time-frequency analysis method in interference detection for GNSS receivers, Sensors, 15, 9404 (2015)

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    Lubk and F

    A. Lubk and F. R¨ oder, Semiclassical TEM image formation in phase space, Ultrami- croscopy, 151, 136 (2015)

    work page 2015

  55. [55]

    M. Mout, M. Wick, F. Bociort, J. Petschulat, and P. Urbach, Ray tracing the Wigner distribution function for optical simulations, Optical Engineering, 57, 01410 (2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    Wu et al., A Computationally Efficient Optimal Wigner Distribution in LCT Do- mains for Detecting Noisy LFM Signals, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2036285 (2022)

    A.-Y. Wu et al., A Computationally Efficient Optimal Wigner Distribution in LCT Do- mains for Detecting Noisy LFM Signals, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2036285 (2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Morandi, Phase space propagation of waves in nonhomogeneous media: corrections beyond the optical geometry limit, J

    O. Morandi, Phase space propagation of waves in nonhomogeneous media: corrections beyond the optical geometry limit, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 57, 145202 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Xiong, Y

    Y. Xiong, Y. Zhang, and S. Shao, A Characteristic-Spectral-Mixed Scheme for Six- Dimensional Wigner-Coulomb Dynamics, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 45, B906 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    S. Shao, T. Lu, and W. Cai, Adaptive conservative cell average spectral element methods for transient Wigner equation in quantum transport, Commun. Comput. Phys, 9, 711– 739 (2011)

    work page 2011

  60. [60]

    Cabrera, D

    R. Cabrera, D. I. Bondar, K. Jacobs, and H. A. Rabitz, Efficient method to generate time evolution of the Wigner function for open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A, 92, 042122 (2015)

    work page 2015

  61. [61]

    L. Chai, S. Jin, Q. Li, and O. Morandi, A multiband semiclassical model for surface hopping quantum dynamics, Multiscale Model. Simul., 13, 205–230 (2015)

    work page 2015

  62. [62]

    Schulz and D

    L. Schulz and D. Schulz, Formulation of a phase space exponential operator for the Wigner transport equation accounting for the spatial variation of the effective mass, Journal of Computational Electronics, 19, 1399 (2020)

    work page 2020

  63. [63]

    G. S. Agarwal, Relation between atomic coherent-state representation, state multipoles, and generalized phase-space distributions, Phys. Rev. A, 24, 2889 (1981)

    work page 1981

  64. [64]

    J. C. Varilly and J. M. Gracia-Bondia, The Moyal Representation for Spin, Ann. of Phys., 190, 107 (1989)

    work page 1989

  65. [65]

    Brif and A

    C. Brif and A. Mann, A general theory of phase-space quasiprobability distributions, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 31, L9 (1998)

    work page 1998

  66. [66]

    Mukunda, Arvind, S

    N. Mukunda, Arvind, S. Chaturvedi, and R. Simon, J. Math. Phys., 45, 114–148 (2004). 29DIMAI Florence REFERENCES REFERENCES

    work page 2004

  67. [67]

    Tilma, M

    T. Tilma, M. J. Everitt, J. H. Samson, W. J. Munro, and Kae Nemoto, Wigner Functions for Arbitrary Quantum Systems, PRL, 117, 180401 (2016)

    work page 2016

  68. [68]

    A. B. Klimov et al, Generalized SU(2) covariant Wigner functions and some of their applications, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 50, 323001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  69. [69]

    Koczor et al, Continuous phase spaces and the time evolution of spins: star products and spin-weighted spherical harmonics, J

    B. Koczor et al, Continuous phase spaces and the time evolution of spins: star products and spin-weighted spherical harmonics, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 52, 055302 (2019)

    work page 2019

  70. [70]

    A. B. Klimov, Exact evolution equations for SU(2) quasidistribution functions, J. Math. Phys., 43, 2202–2213 (2002)

    work page 2002

  71. [71]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 226801 (2005)

    work page 2005

  72. [72]

    M. I. Katsnelson, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, Nat. Phys., 2, 620 (2006)

    work page 2006

  73. [73]

    Das Sarma, S

    S. Das Sarma, S. Adam, E. H. Hwang, and E. Rossi, Electronic transport in graphene. Reviews of Modern Physics, 83, 407 (2011)

    work page 2011

  74. [74]

    Chen et al, Nature, 487, 77 (2012)

    J. Chen et al, Nature, 487, 77 (2012)

    work page 2012

  75. [75]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Phys. Rev. Lett., 102, 216403 (2009)

    work page 2009

  76. [76]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys., 83, 1057 (2011)

    work page 2011

  77. [77]

    Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond, Ann

    A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond, Ann. Phys., 321, 2 (2006)

    work page 2006

  78. [78]

    P. A. Markowich, C. Ringhofer, and C. Schmeiser, Semiconductor Equations. Wien: Springer Verlag (1990)

    work page 1990

  79. [79]

    C. L. Gardner and C. Ringhofer, Smooth quantum potential for the hydrodynamic model, Phys. Rev. E, 53, 157-167 (1996)

    work page 1996

  80. [80]

    Degond, F

    P. Degond, F. M´ ehats, and C. Ringhofer. Quantum energy-transport and drift-diffusion models, J. Stat. Phys., 118, 625 (2005)

    work page 2005

Showing first 80 references.