arxiv: 2604.08093 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Higher-Spin Gravity in Two Dimensions with Vanishing Cosmological Constant

Xavier Bekaert , Michel Pannier

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords higher-spin gravitytwo-dimensional gravityBF formulationvanishing cosmological constantscalar degrees of freedomPoincaré algebraMaxwell algebratwisted coadjoint representation

0 comments

The pith

Two-dimensional higher-spin gravity with vanishing cosmological constant includes an infinite collection of scalars with continuously increasing masses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a gauge theory for higher-spin extensions of two-dimensional gravity with zero cosmological constant by adapting the BF formulation of dilaton gravity to both finite and infinite-dimensional algebras. For the infinite-dimensional case it demonstrates that the spectrum includes an infinite family of scalar fields whose masses form a continuum that grows without limit. These fields arise specifically from the twisted coadjoint representation of the algebra. The authors further sketch a formal procedure for including the backreaction of the scalars on the gravitational background, yielding the first example of a fully interacting higher-spin theory in this setting. A reader would care because the construction removes the usual requirement of a nonzero cosmological constant and supplies a concrete, low-dimensional arena in which higher-spin ideas can be explored with explicit scalar content.

Core claim

Using a version of the BF formulation of two-dimensional dilaton gravity, the authors define a gauge theory for the two-dimensional Poincaré or Maxwell algebras and their higher-spin generalizations of both finite and infinite dimension. The spectrum of the theory based on the extended infinite-dimensional higher-spin algebra with vanishing cosmological constant contains an infinite collection of scalar degrees of freedom with a continuum of ever increasing mass, corresponding to the twisted-(co)adjoint representation. The paper comments on an approach to include the backreaction of these scalar fields on the gravity sector at the level of formal equations of motion, thereby providing afirst

What carries the argument

The BF formulation of two-dimensional dilaton gravity extended to gauge theories of higher-spin generalizations of the Poincaré and Maxwell algebras, with the scalar spectrum fixed by the twisted coadjoint representation of the infinite-dimensional algebra.

If this is right

The spectrum contains infinitely many scalar fields whose masses increase continuously without bound.
Backreaction of the scalars on the gravitational sector can be included at the formal level of the equations of motion.
The construction applies equally to finite-dimensional and infinite-dimensional higher-spin extensions.
No nonzero cosmological constant is required for the higher-spin gauge theory to be well-defined.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same BF extension could be applied to other two-dimensional gravity models to generate analogous infinite scalar spectra.
Explicit evaluation of the mass continuum would make direct numerical comparisons with known spectra in related lower-dimensional theories possible.
Successful inclusion of backreaction beyond the formal level would open the study of nonlinear solutions such as domain walls or black-hole-like configurations.

Load-bearing premise

The BF formulation of two-dimensional dilaton gravity can be consistently extended to define a gauge theory for the infinite-dimensional higher-spin generalizations of the Poincaré and Maxwell algebras, and backreaction can be incorporated at the level of formal equations of motion without inconsistencies.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the quadratic action around a flat background that either fails to produce a continuum of ever-increasing scalar masses or reveals an inconsistency, such as loss of gauge invariance, once backreaction terms are added to the equations of motion.

read the original abstract

In this paper, we use a version of the BF formulation of two-dimensional dilaton gravity that allows to define a gauge theory of the two-dimensional Poincar\'e or Maxwell algebras and several of their higher-spin generalisations, both of finite and infinite dimension. The spectrum of the two-dimensional higher-spin gravity with vanishing cosmological constant based on the extended, infinite-dimensional higher-spin algebra is shown to contain an infinite collection of scalar degrees of freedom with a continuum of ever increasing mass, corresponding to the twisted-(co)adjoint representation. We comment on an approach to include backreaction of the scalar fields on the gravity sector at the level of formal equations of motion, thereby providing a first example of a fully interacting higher-spin gravity theory with vanishing cosmological constant in two dimensions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives a BF gauge theory for infinite-dimensional higher-spin extensions of the 2D Poincaré/Maxwell algebras and extracts an infinite scalar spectrum with steadily rising masses from the twisted coadjoint representation.

read the letter

This paper takes the BF formulation of 2D dilaton gravity and extends it to higher-spin versions of the Poincaré and Maxwell algebras, both finite and infinite dimensional. The new piece is the infinite-algebra case at vanishing cosmological constant, where the linearized spectrum around a background splits into an infinite collection of scalars whose masses increase without bound, all coming from the twisted coadjoint representation of the algebra. The authors also sketch how backreaction might be added through formal equations of motion, which would make this the first explicit interacting example in flat 2D higher-spin gravity. The algebraic setup and the representation-theoretic decomposition look solid on the evidence given; the stress-test note finds no internal inconsistency in those steps, and the claims do not appear to rest on circular reasoning or fitted parameters. The construction is new relative to the cited prior work on finite algebras and non-vanishing cosmological constant. The softer spot is the backreaction comment, which stays at the level of formal equations without explicit solutions or consistency checks beyond the linear spectrum. That part reads more as a suggested direction than a completed result. The paper stays strictly algebraic, so there are no numerical tests or comparisons to other flat-space models. This is for people already working on higher-spin gravity or 2D gravity extensions. A reader in that niche will get a concrete spectrum to compare against and a clear algebraic framework to build on. It deserves a serious referee because the core construction is specific enough to verify and the spectrum claim is falsifiable within the same formalism.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper uses a BF formulation of two-dimensional dilaton gravity to construct gauge theories for the Poincaré and Maxwell algebras and their higher-spin generalizations, both finite and infinite dimensional. For the infinite-dimensional higher-spin algebra with vanishing cosmological constant, the spectrum is shown to contain an infinite collection of scalar degrees of freedom with a continuum of increasing masses, corresponding to the twisted-(co)adjoint representation. The authors also discuss an approach to include backreaction of the scalar fields on the gravity sector at the level of formal equations of motion.

Significance. If the construction is consistent, this represents a significant advance as it provides the first example of an interacting higher-spin gravity theory in two dimensions with vanishing cosmological constant. The identification of the infinite scalar spectrum from the representation theory is a key result that distinguishes this model and could inspire further studies in lower-dimensional higher-spin theories and their potential holographic interpretations.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract refers to 'several of their higher-spin generalisations' without specifying which ones; listing the finite-dimensional cases explicitly would improve clarity.
The paper would benefit from a dedicated section or appendix detailing the explicit commutation relations of the infinite-dimensional algebra to facilitate verification of the spectrum analysis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our work, the clear summary of the main results, and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report, so we have no point-by-point rebuttals to address. We have performed a final check of the manuscript for clarity and minor typographical issues but have not identified any changes required by the referee's feedback.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation is self-contained via algebraic and representation-theoretic methods

full rationale

The paper defines a BF gauge theory for finite and infinite-dimensional higher-spin extensions of the 2D Poincaré/Maxwell algebras, then extracts the linearized spectrum around a background by decomposing the twisted coadjoint representation of the infinite-dimensional algebra. This yields the claimed infinite collection of scalars with increasing masses directly from the algebraic structure and standard representation theory. No central claim reduces to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, a self-referential definition, or a load-bearing self-citation chain; the construction is independent of the target spectrum result and relies on external algebraic facts rather than internal fitting or renaming.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The construction relies on standard assumptions of gauge theory and representation theory for higher-spin algebras; no free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The BF formulation of two-dimensional dilaton gravity admits consistent extensions to higher-spin generalizations of the Poincaré and Maxwell algebras.
This is the foundational premise used to define the gauge theory and analyze its spectrum.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5422 in / 1294 out tokens · 46746 ms · 2026-05-10T18:08:56.417758+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking contradicts

?

contradicts
CONTRADICTS: the theorem conflicts with this paper passage, or marks a claim that would need revision before publication.

the spectrum ... infinite collection of scalar degrees of freedom with a continuum of ever increasing mass, corresponding to the twisted-(co)adjoint representation
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean dAlembert_cosh_solution_aczel echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

M²(k)=M² cosh²(k/2) ... exponential basis (3.10)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

[1]

I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov. ‘AdS dual of the critical O(N) vector model’.Phys. Lett. B550 (2002), pp. 213–219. arXiv:hep-th/0210114 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 2002
[2]

Sezgin and P

E. Sezgin and P . Sundell. ‘Holography in 4D (super) higher spin theories and a test via cubic scalar couplings’.JHEP07 (2005), p. 044. arXiv:hep-th/0305040

work page arXiv 2005
[3]

Holography of the N=1 higher spin theory on AdS(4),

Robert G. Leigh and Anastasios C. Petkou. ‘Holography of the N=1 higher spin theory on AdS(4)’.JHEP06 (2003), p. 011. arXiv:hep-th/0304217

work page arXiv 2003
[4]

Trivedi, Spenta R

Simone Giombi, Shiraz Minwalla, Shiroman Prakash, Sandip P . Trivedi, Spenta R. Wadia and Xi Yin. ‘Chern-Simons Theory with Vector Fermion Matter’.Eur . Phys. J. C72 (2012), p. 2112. arXiv:1110.4386 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2012
[5]

Asymptotic symmetries of three-dimensional gravity coupled to higher-spin fields

Andrea Campoleoni, Stefan Fredenhagen, Stefan Pfenninger and Stefan Theisen. ‘Asymp- totic symmetries of three-dimensional gravity coupled to higher-spin fields’.JHEP11 (2010), p. 007. arXiv:1008.4744 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 2010
[6]

‘Nonlinear W(infinity) Algebra as Asymptotic Sym- metry of Three-Dimensional Higher Spin Anti-de Sitter Gravity’ (2010)

Marc Henneaux and Soo-Jong Rey. ‘Nonlinear W(infinity) Algebra as Asymptotic Sym- metry of Three-Dimensional Higher Spin Anti-de Sitter Gravity’ (2010). arXiv: 1008. 4579 [hep-th]

2010
[7]

Gaberdiel and Rajesh Gopakumar

Matthias R. Gaberdiel and Rajesh Gopakumar. ‘Minimal Model Holography’.J. Phys. A 46 (2013), p. 214002. arXiv:1207.6697 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2013
[8]

Towards higher-spin AdS 2/CFT1 holography,

Konstantin Alkalaev and Xavier Bekaert. ‘Towards higher-spin AdS 2/CFT1 holography’. JHEP04 (2020), p. 206. arXiv:1911.13212 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[9]

‘The discreet charm of the discrete series in dS2’.J

Dionysios Anninos, Tarek Anous, Ben Pethybridge and Gizem ¸ Sengör. ‘The discreet charm of the discrete series in dS2’.J. Phys. A57.2 (2024), p. 025401. arXiv: 2307.15832 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[10]

‘Higher-Spin Poisson Sigma Models and Holographic Duality for SYK Models’ (Sept

Xavier Bekaert, Alexey Sharapov and Evgeny Skvortsov. ‘Higher-Spin Poisson Sigma Models and Holographic Duality for SYK Models’ (Sept. 2025). arXiv: 2509 . 19964 [hep-th]

2025
[11]

Teitelboim

C. Teitelboim. ‘Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions’. Phys. Lett.126B (1983), pp. 41–45

1983
[12]

R. Jackiw. ‘Lower Dimensional Gravity’.Nucl. Phys.B252 (1985), pp. 343–356

1985
[13]

Gross and Vladimir Rosenhaus

David J. Gross and Vladimir Rosenhaus. ‘A line of CFTs: from generalized free fields to SYK’.JHEP07 (2017), p. 086. arXiv:1706.07015 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[14]

Gross and Vladimir Rosenhaus

David J. Gross and Vladimir Rosenhaus. ‘All point correlation functions in SYK’.JHEP12 (2017), p. 148. arXiv:1710.08113 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[15]

M. P . Blencowe. ‘A Consistent Interacting Massless Higher Spin Field Theory in D = (2+1)’.Class. Quant. Grav.6 (1989), p. 443

1989
[16]

K. B. Alkalaev. ‘On higher spin extension of the Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity model’.J. Phys. A47 (2014), p. 365401. arXiv:1311.5119 [hep-th]. 30

work page arXiv 2014
[17]

‘Anti-de Sitter holography for gravity and higher spin theories in two dimensions’.Phys

Daniel Grumiller, Mauricio Leston and Dmitri Vassilevich. ‘Anti-de Sitter holography for gravity and higher spin theories in two dimensions’.Phys. Rev. D89.4 (2014), p. 044001. arXiv:1311.7413 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2014
[18]

K. B. Alkalaev. ‘Global and local properties of AdS2 higher spin gravity’.JHEP10 (2014), p. 122. arXiv:1404.5330 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2014
[19]

S. F . Prokushkin and Mikhail A. Vasiliev. ‘Higher spin gauge interactions for massive matter fields in 3-D AdS space-time’.Nucl. Phys.B545 (1999), p. 385. arXiv: hep-th/ 9806236 [hep-th]

1999
[20]

Vasiliev

Sergey Prokushkin and Mikhail A. Vasiliev. ‘3-d higher spin gauge theories with matter’. 2nd International Seminar on Supersymmetries and Quantum Symmetries: Dedicated to the Memory of Victor I. Ogievetsky. Dec. 1998. arXiv:hep-th/9812242

work page arXiv 1998
[21]

Gaberdiel and R

Matthias R. Gaberdiel and Rajesh Gopakumar. ‘An AdS Dual for Minimal Model CFTs’. Phys. Rev.D83 (2011), p. 066007. arXiv:1011.2986 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2011
[22]

On BF-type higher-spin actions in two dimensions,

Konstantin Alkalaev and Xavier Bekaert. ‘On BF-type higher-spin actions in two dimen- sions’.JHEP05 (2020), p. 158. arXiv:2002.02387 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[23]

Vasiliev

Mikhail A. Vasiliev. ‘Higher spin gauge interactions for matter fields in two-dimensions’. Phys. Lett. B363 (1995), pp. 51–57. arXiv:hep-th/9511063

work page arXiv 1995
[24]

‘Demystifying integrable QFTs in AdS: No-go theorems for higher-spin charges’.SciPost Phys.20 (2026), p

António Antunes, Nat Levine and Marco Meineri. ‘Demystifying integrable QFTs in AdS: No-go theorems for higher-spin charges’.SciPost Phys.20 (2026), p. 088. arXiv: 2502.06937 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2026
[25]

Afshar, A

Hamid Afshar, Arjun Bagchi, Reza Fareghbal, Daniel Grumiller and Jan Rosseel. ‘Spin-3 Gravity in Three-Dimensional Flat Space’.Phys. Rev. Lett.111.12 (2013), p. 121603. arXiv: 1307.4768 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2013
[26]

Gonzalez, J

Hernan A. Gonzalez, Javier Matulich, Miguel Pino and Ricardo Troncoso. ‘Asymptotically flat spacetimes in three-dimensional higher spin gravity’.JHEP09 (2013), p. 016. arXiv: 1307.5651 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2013
[27]

Grumiller, M

D. Grumiller, M. Riegler and J. Rosseel. ‘Unitarity in three-dimensional flat space higher spin theories’.JHEP07 (2014), p. 015. arXiv:1403.5297 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2014
[28]

Ammon, D

Martin Ammon, Daniel Grumiller, Stefan Prohazka, Max Riegler and Raphaela Wutte. ‘Higher-Spin Flat Space Cosmologies with Soft Hair’.JHEP05 (2017), p. 031. arXiv: 1703.02594 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[29]

‘Scalar Fields in 3D Asymptotically Flat Higher-Spin Gravity’.J

Martin Ammon, Michel Pannier and Max Riegler. ‘Scalar Fields in 3D Asymptotically Flat Higher-Spin Gravity’.J. Phys. A54.10 (2021), p. 105401. arXiv:2009.14210 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[30]

Campoleoni and S

Andrea Campoleoni and Simon Pekar. ‘Carrollian and Galilean conformal higher-spin algebras in any dimensions’.JHEP02 (2022), p. 150. arXiv:2110.07794 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[31]

Ammon and M

Martin Ammon and Michel Pannier. ‘Unfolded Fierz-Pauli equations in three-dimensional asymptotically flat spacetimes’.JHEP02 (2023), p. 161. arXiv:2211.12530 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[32]

R. Jackiw. ‘Gauge theories for gravity on a line’.Theor . Math. Phys.92 (1992), pp. 979–987. arXiv:hep-th/9206093. 31

work page arXiv 1992
[33]

Grumiller, J

Daniel Grumiller, Jelle Hartong, Stefan Prohazka and Jakob Salzer. ‘Limits of JT gravity’. JHEP02 (2021), p. 134. arXiv:2011.13870 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[34]

Cangemi and R

D. Cangemi and R. Jackiw. ‘Gauge invariant formulations of lineal gravity’.Phys. Rev. Lett.69 (1992), pp. 233–236. arXiv:hep-th/9203056

work page arXiv 1992
[35]

Evanescent Black Holes

Curtis G. Callan Jr., Steven B. Giddings, Jeffrey A. Harvey and Andrew Strominger. ‘Evan- escent black holes’.Phys. Rev. D45.4 (1992), R1005. arXiv:hep-th/9111056

work page Pith review arXiv 1992
[36]

Afshar, H

Hamid Afshar, Hernán A. González, Daniel Grumiller and Dmitri Vassilevich. ‘Flat space holography and the complex Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model’.Phys. Rev. D101.8 (2020), p. 086024. arXiv:1911.05739 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[37]

Vasiliev

Mikhail A. Vasiliev. ‘Higher spin gauge theories in four-dimensions, three-dimensions, and two-dimensions’.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D5 (1996). Ed. by V . A. Berezin, V . A. Rubakov and D. V . Semikoz, pp. 763–797. arXiv:hep-th/9611024

work page arXiv 1996
[38]

‘Gauge Theory of Two-dimensional Gravity’

Takeshi Fukuyama and Kiyoshi Kamimura. ‘Gauge Theory of Two-dimensional Gravity’. Phys. Lett.160B (1985), pp. 259–262

1985
[39]

Isler and C

K. Isler and C. A. Trugenberger. ‘A Gauge Theory of Two-dimensional Quantum Gravity’. Phys. Rev. Lett.63 (1989), p. 834

1989
[40]

Chamseddine and D

Ali H. Chamseddine and D. Wyler. ‘Topological Gravity in (1+1)-dimensions’.Nucl. Phys. B340 (1990), pp. 595–616

1990
[41]

Arnol’ d.Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics

V .I. Arnol’ d.Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. Springer-Verlag New York, 1989

1989
[42]

Gonzalez, Blagoje Oblak and Max Riegler

Andrea Campoleoni, Hernan A. Gonzalez, Blagoje Oblak and Max Riegler. ‘Rotating Higher Spin Partition Functions and Extended BMS Symmetries’.JHEP04 (2016), p. 034. arXiv:1512.03353 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2016
[43]

Campoleoni, H.A

Andrea Campoleoni, Hernan A. Gonzalez, Blagoje Oblak and Max Riegler. ‘BMS Modules in Three Dimensions’.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A31.12 (2016). Ed. by Lars Brink, Marc Henneaux and Mikhail A. Vasiliev, p. 1650068. arXiv:1603.03812 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2016
[44]

Boris L. Feigin. ‘Lie algebras g l(λ) and cohomologies of Lie algebras of differential operators’.Russian Math. Surv.43 (1988), pp. 169–170

1988
[45]

Bordemann, J

M. Bordemann, J. Hoppe and P . Schaller. ‘Infinite-dimensional matrix algebras’.Phys. Lett. B232 (1989), pp. 199–203

1989
[46]

Bergshoeff, M

E. Bergshoeff, M. P . Blencowe and K. S. Stelle. ‘Area Preserving Diffeomorphisms and Higher Spin Algebra’.Commun. Math. Phys.128 (1990), p. 213

1990
[47]

C. N. Pope, L. J. Romans and X. Shen. ‘W (infinity) and the Racah-wigner Algebra’.Nucl. Phys. B339 (1990), pp. 191–221

1990
[48]

Vasiliev

Mikhail A. Vasiliev. ‘Higher Spin Algebras and Quantization on the Sphere and Hyper- boloid’.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A6 (1991), pp. 1115–1135

1991
[49]

E. S. Fradkin and V . Ya. Linetsky. ‘Infinite dimensional generalizations of simple Lie algebras’.Mod. Phys. Lett.A5 (1990), pp. 1967–1977. 32

1990
[50]

World Scientific, 1985

Wu-Ki Tung.Group Theory in Physics. World Scientific, 1985

1985
[51]

‘Flat JT gravity and the BMS-Schwarzian’.JHEP11 (2022), p

Hamid Afshar and Blagoje Oblak. ‘Flat JT gravity and the BMS-Schwarzian’.JHEP11 (2022), p. 172. arXiv:2112.14609 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[52]

S. E. Konshtein and Mikhail A. Vasiliev. ‘Massless Representations and Admissibility Condition for Higher Spin Superalgebras’.Nucl. Phys. B312 (1989), pp. 402–418

1989
[53]

‘A∞ algebras from slightly broken higher spin symmetries’.JHEP09 (2019), p

Alexey Sharapov and Evgeny Skvortsov. ‘A∞ algebras from slightly broken higher spin symmetries’.JHEP09 (2019), p. 024. arXiv:1809.10027 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[54]

‘Formal Higher Spin Gravities’.Nucl

Alexey Sharapov and Evgeny Skvortsov. ‘Formal Higher Spin Gravities’.Nucl. Phys.B941 (2019), pp. 838–860. arXiv:1901.01426 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[55]

A WZW model based on a non-semi-simple group

Chiara R. Nappi and Edward Witten. ‘A WZW model based on a nonsemisimple group’. Phys. Rev. Lett.71 (1993), pp. 3751–3753. arXiv:hep-th/9310112

work page Pith review arXiv 1993
[56]

Schrader

R. Schrader. ‘The maxwell group and the quantum theory of particles in classical homo- geneous electromagnetic fields’.Fortsch. Phys.20 (1972), pp. 701–734

1972
[57]

‘Infinite Sequence of Poincare Group Extensions: Structure and Dynamics’.J

Sotirios Bonanos and Joaquim Gomis. ‘Infinite Sequence of Poincare Group Extensions: Structure and Dynamics’.J. Phys. A43 (2010), p. 015201. arXiv:0812.4140 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2010
[58]

‘On free Lie algebras and particles in electro- magnetic fields’.JHEP07 (2017), p

Joaquim Gomis and Axel Kleinschmidt. ‘On free Lie algebras and particles in electro- magnetic fields’.JHEP07 (2017), p. 085. arXiv:1705.05854 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[59]

‘Minimal models of field theories: Chiral higher spin gravity’.Phys

Evgeny Skvortsov and Richard Van Dongen. ‘Minimal models of field theories: Chiral higher spin gravity’.Phys. Rev. D106.4 (2022), p. 045006. arXiv: 2204.10285 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[60]

R. O. de Mello and Victor O. Rivelles. ‘The Irreducible unitary representations of the extended Poincare group in (1+1)-dimensions’.J. Math. Phys.45 (2004), pp. 1156–1167. arXiv:math-ph/0208024

work page arXiv 2004
[61]

Teitelboim

C. Teitelboim. ‘Supergravity and Hamiltonian structure in two space-time dimensions’. Phys. Lett. B126 (1983), pp. 46–48

1983
[62]

‘Topological Supergravity in Two-dimensions’.Phys

David Montano, Kenichiro Aoki and Jacob Sonnenschein. ‘Topological Supergravity in Two-dimensions’.Phys. Lett. B247 (1990), pp. 64–70

1990
[63]

González, Daniel Grumiller, Carlos Valcárcel and Dmitri Vassilevich

Marcela Cárdenas, Oscar Fuentealba, Hernán A. González, Daniel Grumiller, Carlos Valcárcel and Dmitri Vassilevich. ‘Boundary theories for dilaton supergravity in 2D’. JHEP11 (2018), p. 077. arXiv:1809.07208 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2018
[64]

‘Color decorations of Jackiw- Teitelboim gravity’.JHEP08 (2022), p

Konstantin Alkalaev, Euihun Joung and Junggi Yoon. ‘Color decorations of Jackiw- Teitelboim gravity’.JHEP08 (2022), p. 286. arXiv:2204.10214 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[65]

‘Quantum Theory of a Massless Relativistic Surface and a Two-Dimensional Bound State Problem’

Jens Hoppe. ‘Quantum Theory of a Massless Relativistic Surface and a Two-Dimensional Bound State Problem’. PhD thesis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Techno- logy, 1982.URL:https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/15717

1982
[66]

González, Daniel Grumiller and Jakob Salzer

Hernán A. González, Daniel Grumiller and Jakob Salzer. ‘Towards a bulk description of higher spin SYK’.JHEP05 (2018), p. 083. arXiv:1802.01562 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2018
[67]

‘A Matrix Model for Flat Space Quantum Gravity’.JHEP03 (2023), p

Arjun Kar, Lampros Lamprou, Charles Marteau and Felipe Rosso. ‘A Matrix Model for Flat Space Quantum Gravity’.JHEP03 (2023), p. 249. arXiv:2208.05974 [hep-th]. 33

work page arXiv 2023
[68]

‘Higher spin JT gravity and a matrix model dual’.JHEP09 (2022), p

Jorrit Kruthoff. ‘Higher spin JT gravity and a matrix model dual’.JHEP09 (2022), p. 017. arXiv:2204.09685 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[69]

‘Supersymmetric localization of (higher-spin) JT gravity: a bulk perspective’.JHEP12 (2023), p

Luca Griguolo, Luigi Guerrini, Rodolfo Panerai, Jacopo Papalini and Domenico Seminara. ‘Supersymmetric localization of (higher-spin) JT gravity: a bulk perspective’.JHEP12 (2023), p. 124. arXiv:2307.01274 [hep-th]. 34

work page arXiv 2023