arxiv: 2604.08202 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Dynamics for Spin-1/2 Particles in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity

E.Maciel

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravityDirac equationspin-1/2 particlesquantum dynamicsblack hole spacetimeforce operatorHeisenberg equationshigher-curvature corrections

0 comments

The pith

The force operator on a spin-1/2 particle in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet black holes acquires explicit corrections from the higher-curvature coupling that change the radial force in strong fields.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper starts from the Dirac equation in a static spherically symmetric Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet spacetime and uses the tetrad formalism to build the corresponding Hamiltonian. It then applies the Heisenberg equations of motion to obtain explicit operator expressions for the particle velocity and force. The resulting force operator includes additional terms that depend on the Gauss-Bonnet coupling parameter ξ. These terms represent higher-curvature modifications to gravity that appear at the quantum level and cause the effective radial force to differ from its general-relativistic form, with the difference growing in the strong-field region. A reader would care because the work supplies a concrete operator description of how quantum particles respond to modified gravity beyond classical geodesic motion.

Core claim

In the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet background the Dirac Hamiltonian, built via tetrads and the spin connection, generates Heisenberg equations whose solution yields a force operator containing corrections that depend explicitly on the Gauss-Bonnet coupling parameter ξ. These corrections encode higher-curvature modifications of the gravitational interaction at the quantum level. In particular, the effective radial force deviates from its general relativistic counterpart by terms that become significant in the strong-field regime.

What carries the argument

The Dirac Hamiltonian in the EGB metric, obtained from the tetrad formalism and associated spin connection, which supplies the generator for the Heisenberg equations of motion that produce the velocity and force operators.

If this is right

The radial component of the force operator deviates from its general-relativistic value by terms proportional to the Gauss-Bonnet coupling.
The size of these deviations grows in the strong-field region near the black-hole horizon.
The operator description incorporates both relativistic quantum effects and higher-curvature gravitational corrections simultaneously.
Particle trajectories are described beyond classical geodesics once the Heisenberg force operator is used.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the derived corrections survive further consistency checks, they could serve as a diagnostic for distinguishing Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity from general relativity using spin-polarized probes.
The same operator construction might be applied to other higher-curvature theories to compare their effects on quantum particle motion.
The strong-field modifications could enter calculations of quantum-field behavior or particle spectra in EGB spacetimes.

Load-bearing premise

The tetrad formalism and associated spin connection provide the correct Dirac Hamiltonian in the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet background without additional quantum corrections or inconsistencies from the higher-curvature terms.

What would settle it

An explicit recomputation of the force operator that sets the Gauss-Bonnet coupling ξ to zero and fails to recover the known general-relativistic force operator for a Dirac particle in Schwarzschild spacetime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08202 by E.Maciel.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: Radial gravitational force as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

I investigate the quantum dynamics of a spin-$1/2$ particle in a static, spherically symmetric Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet (EGB) black-hole spacetime within the Hamiltonian framework. Starting from the Dirac equation in curved spacetime, formulated via the tetrad formalism and the associated spin connection, we construct the corresponding Dirac Hamiltonian in the EGB background. Using this Hamiltonian, we derive the Heisenberg equations of motion for the position and momentum operators, obtaining explicit expressions for the velocity and force operators. This operator-based approach provides a direct description of particle dynamics beyond classical geodesic motion, incorporating both relativistic and quantum effects. We show that the resulting force operator contains corrections explicitly dependent on the Gauss-Bonnet coupling parameter $\xi$, which encode higher-curvature modifications of the gravitational interaction at the quantum level. In particular, the effective radial force deviates from its general relativistic counterpart by terms that become significant in the strong-field regime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper derives explicit velocity and force operators for a Dirac particle in EGB spacetime, with the force picking up new terms linear in the Gauss-Bonnet coupling ξ.

read the letter

The main result is the construction of the Heisenberg velocity and force operators for a spin-1/2 particle in a static spherically symmetric Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet black hole. The force operator acquires corrections that depend explicitly on ξ and become noticeable in the strong-field region near the horizon. They obtain this by writing the curved-space Dirac equation with a tetrad and spin connection adapted to the EGB metric, forming the Hamiltonian, and then taking commutators with the Hamiltonian to generate the operator equations of motion. The ξ dependence enters only through the modified metric functions, so the radial force deviates from its GR counterpart by terms proportional to ξ. This is a direct extension of earlier Dirac-in-curved-space calculations, and the explicit operator forms for this background are new. The setup stays within the standard formalism without introducing extra higher-curvature vertices for the spinor, which keeps the logic consistent. The abstract gives only the outline, so the actual expressions and any intermediate algebra are not visible here; that leaves the technical accuracy dependent on the full derivation. No obvious internal contradictions appear in the stated approach, and the GR limit should hold when ξ vanishes. This work is aimed at researchers who already work with operator methods for fermions in black-hole spacetimes or who want concrete expressions for how modified gravity alters quantum dynamics. A reader looking for explicit ξ corrections to compare against other modified-gravity calculations would find it useful. It deserves a serious referee because the calculation is self-contained and the claimed operator corrections can be checked by repeating the commutator steps.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper derives the Dirac Hamiltonian for a spin-1/2 particle in a static, spherically symmetric Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet black-hole spacetime via the tetrad formalism and spin connection. It then obtains the Heisenberg equations of motion for the position and momentum operators, yielding explicit expressions for the velocity and force operators. The central result is that the force operator contains corrections that depend explicitly on the Gauss-Bonnet coupling ξ and deviate from the general-relativistic case, with the deviations becoming significant in the strong-field regime.

Significance. If the derivation holds, the work supplies a concrete operator-level description of quantum particle dynamics on an EGB background. Because the construction applies the standard curved-space Dirac equation without additional higher-curvature vertices or ad-hoc quantum corrections, the ξ dependence enters solely through the modified metric functions; this is a strength, as it keeps the treatment parameter-free beyond the single coupling ξ already present in the classical theory. The resulting force operator therefore provides a falsifiable starting point for exploring how higher-curvature terms affect quantum trajectories near black holes.

minor comments (3)

[Section 2] The explicit form of the EGB metric (including the precise dependence of the lapse and radial functions on ξ) should be stated at the beginning of the Hamiltonian construction so that the origin of the ξ corrections is immediately transparent.
A quantitative comparison (analytic or numerical) of the radial force operator with its GR limit (ξ = 0) in the strong-field regime would strengthen the claim that the corrections become significant; at present the statement remains qualitative.
[Abstract and final discussion] The interpretation that the corrections 'encode higher-curvature modifications of the gravitational interaction at the quantum level' should be rephrased for precision: the background is classical, so the modifications are geometric; the quantum aspect resides only in the treatment of the particle.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and constructive assessment of our manuscript. The referee's summary accurately reflects the central results: the derivation of the Dirac Hamiltonian in the EGB background via the tetrad formalism, followed by the Heisenberg equations yielding explicit velocity and force operators that contain ξ-dependent corrections significant in the strong-field regime. We appreciate the recognition that our approach relies solely on the standard curved-space Dirac equation, with the Gauss-Bonnet coupling entering only through the modified metric. No specific major comments were provided under the MAJOR COMMENTS section of the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard tetrad application to EGB metric

full rationale

The derivation begins from the standard curved-space Dirac equation using the tetrad formalism and spin connection, substitutes the given EGB metric (whose ξ dependence is external input from the classical EGB solution), and computes the Heisenberg velocity and force operators. No parameters are fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions, no self-definitional loops exist between the force operator and its inputs, and no load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems are invoked. The ξ corrections emerge directly from the metric components in the standard expressions, rendering the chain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard formulation of the Dirac equation in curved spacetime and the assumption that the EGB metric is an exact solution whose curvature enters the spin connection in the usual way.

free parameters (1)

ξ
Gauss-Bonnet coupling constant that parametrizes the higher-curvature term and appears directly in the force-operator corrections.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Dirac equation in curved spacetime is correctly formulated via tetrad formalism and spin connection
Invoked to construct the Hamiltonian in the EGB background.
domain assumption Background spacetime is static and spherically symmetric EGB black hole
Used as the fixed metric for all operator calculations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5455 in / 1380 out tokens · 46796 ms · 2026-05-10T16:54:08.343553+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

[1]

Lovelock, J

Lovelock,D. (1971). “The Einstein tensor and its generalizations”. Journal of Mathematical Physics.12(3), 498-501. DOI: 10.1063/1.1665613

work page doi:10.1063/1.1665613 1971
[2]

String-Generated Gravity Models

Boulware, D. G. and Deser, S. (1985). “String-Generated Gravity Models”. Physical Review Letters.55, 2656. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2656

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.55.2656 1985
[3]

The 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet Theory of Gravity: A Review

Fernandes, P. G. S. et al. (2022). “The 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet Theory of Gravity: A Review”. arXiv:2202.13908 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[4]

Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity in four-dimensional space- time,

Glavan, D. and Lin, C. (2020). “Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity in Four-Dimensional Spacetime”. Physical Review Letters. 124, 081301. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.081301

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.081301 2020
[5]

Is there a novel Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet theory in four dimensions?

Gurses, M., Sisman, T. C. and Tekin, B. (2020). “Is there a novel Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet theory in four dimensions?”. European Physical Journal C.80, 647. DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8200-6

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8200-6 2020
[6]

Quasinormal modes of black holes: from astrophysics to string theory

Konoplya, R. A. and Zhidenko, A. (2011). “Quasinormal modes of black holes: from astrophysics to string theory”. Reviews of Modern Physics.83, 793. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.793

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.793 2011
[7]

New Gauss-Bonnet black holes with curvature-induced scalarization

Doneva, D. D. and Yazadjiev, S. S. (2018). “New Gauss-Bonnet black holes with curvature-induced scalarization”. Physical Review Letters.120, 131103. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.131103

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.131103 2018
[8]

Atamurotov, S

Atamurotov, F. et al. (2021). “Charged black hole in 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity: particle motion, plasma effect on weak gravitational lensing and centre-of-mass energy”. arXiv:2105.02214 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[9]

Perturbative and nonperturbative fermionic quasinormal modes of Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet-AdS black holes

Gonz´ alez, P. A., V´ asquez, Y. and Vi˜ nuela, E. (2018). “Perturbative and nonperturbative fermionic quasinormal modes of Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet-AdS black holes”. Physical Review D.98(6), 064046. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.064046

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.064046 2018
[11]

Interaction of neutrinos and gravitational fields

Brill, D. R. and Wheeler, J. A. (1957). “Interaction of neutrinos and gravitational fields”. Reviews of Modern Physics.29,

1957
[12]

DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.29.465

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.29.465
[13]

Dynamical theory of groups and fields

DeWitt, B. S. and Mullin, A. A. (1966). “Dynamical theory of groups and fields”. American Journal of Physics.34(12),

1966
[14]

DOI: 10.1119/1.1972545. 9

work page doi:10.1119/1.1972545
[15]

Relativistic quantum dynamics of spin-1/2 particles in gravitational fields

Silva, A. H., Muniz, C. R., Cunha, M. S. and Souza, C. A. S. (2019). “Relativistic quantum dynamics of spin-1/2 particles in gravitational fields”. Annals of Physics.405, 158–171. DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2019.02.020

work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2019.02.020 2019
[16]

One-electron atom as a probe of spacetime curvature

Parker, L. (1980). “One-electron atom as a probe of spacetime curvature”. Physical Review D.22(8), 1922–1934. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.22.1922

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.22.1922 1980
[17]

Spin in an arbitrary gravitational field

Obukhov, Y. N., Silenko, A. J. and Teryaev, O. V. (2013). “Spin in an arbitrary gravitational field”. Physical Review D. 88(8), 084014. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.084014

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.084014 2013
[18]

Inertial effects of a Dirac particle

Hehl, F. W. and Ni, W.-T. (1990). “Inertial effects of a Dirac particle”. Physical Review D.42, 2045. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.42.2045

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.42.2045 1990
[19]

Nonrelativistic Limit of the Dirac–Schwarzschild Hamiltonian: Gravitational Zitterbewegung and Gravitational Spin-Orbit Coupling

Jentschura, U. D. and Noble, J. H. (2013). “Nonrelativistic Limit of the Dirac–Schwarzschild Hamiltonian: Gravitational Zitterbewegung and Gravitational Spin-Orbit Coupling”. arXiv:1306.0479 [gr-qc].nal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.2021. DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/08/045

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/08/045 2013
[20]

More on equations of motion for interacting massless fields of all spins in (3+1)-dimensions

Zumino,B. (1986). “Gravity theories in more than four dimensions”. Physics Reports.137(1), 109–114. DOI: 10.1016/0370- 1573(86)90076-1

work page doi:10.1016/0370- 1986
[21]

Inconsistencies in four-dimensional Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity

Arrechea,J., Delhom,A., Jim´ enez-Cano,A. (2021). “Inconsistencies in four-dimensional Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity”. Chinese Physics C.45(1), 013107. DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/45/1/013107

work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/45/1/013107 2021
[22]

Topological natures of the Gauss-Bonnet black hole in AdS space

Liu,C., Wang,J. (2023). “Topological natures of the Gauss-Bonnet black hole in AdS space”. Physical Review D.107(6), 064023. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.064023

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.064023 2023
[23]

The quartic effective action for the heterotic string

Gross,D.J., Sloan,J.H. (1987). “The quartic effective action for the heterotic string”. Nuclear Physics B.291, 41–89. DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(87)90465-2

work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90465-2 1987
[24]

Gravitational lensing by charged black hole in regularized 4D Einstein–Gauss– Bonnet gravity

Kumar,R., Islam,S.U., Ghosh,S.G. (2020). “Gravitational lensing by charged black hole in regularized 4D Einstein–Gauss– Bonnet gravity”. The European Physical Journal C.80(12), 1128. DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08631-1

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08631-1 2020
[25]

Quark stars in 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity with an interacting quark equation of state

Banerjee,A., Tangphati,T., Samart,D., Channuie,P. (2021). “Quark stars in 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity with an interacting quark equation of state”. The Astrophysical Journal.906(2), 114. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc8db

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc8db 2021
[26]

Charged AdS black holes with finite electrodynamics in 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity

Jusufi,K. (2023). “Charged AdS black holes with finite electrodynamics in 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity”. Chinese Physics C.47(3), 035108. DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac9f4c

work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ac9f4c 2023
[27]

Dilatonic black holes in higher curvature string gravity

Kanti,P., Mavromatos,N.E., Rizos,J., Tamvakis,K., Winstanley,E. (1996). “Dilatonic black holes in higher curvature string gravity”. Physical Review D.54(8), 5049–5058. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.5049

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.54.5049 1996
[28]

On Gauss–Bonnet black hole entropy

Clunan,T., Ross,S.F., Smith,D.J. (2004). “On Gauss–Bonnet black hole entropy”. Classical and Quantum Gravity.21(14), 3447–3458. DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/21/14/015

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/14/015 2004
[29]

Black hole entropy and the dimensional continuation of the Gauss-Bonnet theorem

Banados,M., Teitelboim,C., Zanelli,J. (1994). “Black hole entropy and the dimensional continuation of the Gauss-Bonnet theorem”. Physical Review Letters.72(7), 957–960. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.957

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.957 1994
[30]

A new class of regular black holes in Einstein Gauss-Bonnet gravity with localized sources of matter

Estrada,M., Aros,R. (2023). “A new class of regular black holes in Einstein Gauss-Bonnet gravity with localized sources of matter”. Physics Letters B.844, 138090. DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138090

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138090 2023
[31]

Entropic uncertainty and coherence in Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity

Li,W.-M., Lu,J., Wu,S.-M. (2026). “Entropic uncertainty and coherence in Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity”. The European Physical Journal C.86(1), 59. DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13521-4

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13521-4 2026
[32]

Advanced quantum mechanics

Sakurai,J.J., Valk,H.S. (1969). “Advanced quantum mechanics”. Physics Today.22(2), 80. DOI: 10.1063/1.3035574

work page doi:10.1063/1.3035574 1969
[33]

(1965).Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Bjorken,J.D., Drell,S.D. (1965).Relativistic Quantum Mechanics. New York: McGraw-Hill. DOI: 10.1063/1.3051343

work page doi:10.1063/1.3051343 1965
[34]

Relativistic quantum mechanics

Dirac,P.A.M. (1932). “Relativistic quantum mechanics”. Proceedings of the Royal Society A.136(829), 453-464. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1932.0123

work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1932.0123 1932
[35]

Quasinormal modes of the Dirac field in the consistent 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity

Churilova,M.S. (2021). “Quasinormal modes of the Dirac field in the consistent 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity”. Physics of the Dark Universe.31, 100748. DOI: 10.1016/j.dark.2021.100748

work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2021.100748 2021
[36]

Quasinormal modes of Dirac field in the Einstein–Dilaton–Gauss–Bonnet and Einstein–Weyl gravities

Zinhailo,A.F. (2019). “Quasinormal modes of Dirac field in the Einstein–Dilaton–Gauss–Bonnet and Einstein–Weyl gravities”. European Physical Journal C.79(11), 912. DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7440-3

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7440-3 2019
[37]

Springer Dordrecht, 1988.doi:10.1007/978- 94-009-2871-8

Collas,P., Klein,D. (2019).The Dirac Equation in Curved Spacetime: A Guide for Calculations. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978- 3-030-14825-2

work page doi:10.1007/978- 2019
[38]

Black holes in theories with large extra dimensions: a review

Kanti,P. (2004). “Black holes in theories with large extra dimensions: a review”. International Journal of Modern Physics A.19(29), 4899-4951. DOI: 10.1142/S0217751X04018324

work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x04018324 2004
[39]

Spin, gravity, and inertia

Obukhov,Y.N. (2001). “Spin, gravity, and inertia”. Physical Review Letters.86(2), 192-195. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.192

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.192 2001
[40]

Gravitationally induced neutrino-oscillation phases

Ahluwalia,D.V., Burgard,C. (1996). “Gravitationally induced neutrino-oscillation phases”. General Relativity and Gravitation.28(10), 1161-1170. DOI: 10.1007/BF02105044

work page doi:10.1007/bf02105044 1996
[41]

S.et al.Search for new physics with atoms and molecules.Rev

Safronova,M.S., Budker,D., DeMille,D., Kimball,D.F.J., Derevianko,A., Clark,C.W. (2018). “Search for new physics with atoms and molecules”. Reviews of Modern Physics.90(2), 025008. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.025008

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.025008 2018
[42]

Observation of the 1S–2S transition in antihydrogen

Ahmadi,M.et al.(ALPHA Collaboration) (2017). “Observation of the 1S–2S transition in antihydrogen”. Nature.541, 506-510. DOI: 10.1038/nature21040

work page doi:10.1038/nature21040 2017
[43]

Laser spectroscopy of antihydrogen

Ahmadi,M.et al.(ALPHA Collaboration) (2017). “Laser spectroscopy of antihydrogen”. Nature.548, 66-69. DOI: 10.1038/nature23498

work page doi:10.1038/nature23498 2017
[44]

New determination of the fine-structure constant from the electron g value and QED

Gabrielse,G., Hanneke,D., Kinoshita,T., Nio,M., Odom,B. (2006). “New determination of the fine-structure constant from the electron g value and QED”. Physical Review Letters.97, 030802. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.030802

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.030802 2006
[45]

Data tables for Lorentz and CPT violation

Kosteleck´ y,V.A., Russell,N. (2011). “Data tables for Lorentz and CPT violation”. Reviews of Modern Physics.83, 11-31. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.11

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.11 2011
[46]

Gravitational dipole moment in braneworld model

Maciel,E.B., Anacleto,M.A., Passos,E. (2025). “Gravitational dipole moment in braneworld model”. European Physical Journal Plus.140(7), 678. DOI: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-0678-0

work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-0678-0 2025
[47]

Regularized 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity

Casadio,R.et al.(2020). “Regularized 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity”. Physics Letters B.807, 135558. DOI: 10 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135558

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135558 2020