pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.08338 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · nlin.CD

Controlling the rain fall statistics using Mean-Reverting Jump Diffusion model

Joya GhoshDastider , D. Pal , Pankaj Kumar Mishra This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech nlin.CD
keywords rainfall modelingjump diffusionmean reversionextreme eventsdry spellsstochastic simulationmultifractal scalingsynthetic time series
0
0 comments X

The pith

A mean-reverting jump-diffusion model reproduces real rainfall intermittency and allows parameter changes to shift distributions and control extremes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a stochastic model combining mean reversion with random jumps to generate synthetic rainfall time series that match half-hourly observations from northeast India. The simulations recover the superdiffusive spreading, probability distributions, and multifractal scaling seen in the data. Systematic variation of the jump rate and reversion strength produces a transition from log-normal to gamma statistics while directly altering the frequency of large events and the length of dry intervals. Spectral and wavelet checks confirm that the generated series preserve the dominant time scales of actual rainfall.

Core claim

The authors claim that a mean-reverting jump-diffusion process, calibrated to long-term rainfall records, generates intermittent series with a superdiffusive exponent near 1.8, matching observed distributions and multifractal features, and that deliberate changes in its parameters induce a log-normal-to-gamma transition that modulates the occurrence of extremes and the duration of dry patches.

What carries the argument

The mean-reverting jump-diffusion process, a stochastic differential equation that adds discrete random jumps to continuous mean-reverting dynamics to represent rainfall intensity fluctuations over time.

Load-bearing premise

Rainfall statistics can be captured by a simple combination of mean reversion and random jumps without additional physical constraints or spatial interactions.

What would settle it

A new dataset from another region in which the measured frequency of extreme events fails to follow the predicted monotonic relation with the fitted jump intensity parameter would falsify the controllability claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08338 by D. Pal, Joya GhoshDastider, Pankaj Kumar Mishra.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Temporal evolution of observed rainfall data of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Temporal evolution of the simulated rainfall data. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. PDF of simulated rainfall data using Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Behaviour of extreme events with parameter varia [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Variation of the PDF of dry patch duration for differen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Power spectral density (PSD) of simulated rainfall t [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Wavelet analysis of the simulated rainfall time seri [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Multifractal analysis of the simulated rainfall tim [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a stochastic mean-reverting jump-diffusion model to simulate rainfall time series and validate it using long-term half-hourly rain fall data from the North-East region of India. The model captures the intermittent and extreme-event dynamics of rainfall, reproducing superdiffusive behavior with an exponent $\sim 1.8$, along with the observed probability distributions and multifractal features. By systematically varying key parameters, we demonstrate a transition between Log-Normal and Gamma distributions, and show how the occurrence of extreme events and dry-patch durations can be controlled. Spectral and wavelet analyses further confirm that the simulated series reproduces the dominant temporal scales observed in real rainfall data. Our proposed framework provides a robust tool for generating realistic synthetic rainfall series and serves as an effective approach for understanding the influence of underlying stochastic processes that governs the rainfall statistics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a mean-reverting jump-diffusion stochastic process as a model for rainfall time series. It validates the model on long-term half-hourly rainfall observations from North-East India, claiming reproduction of superdiffusive scaling (exponent ~1.8), a transition from log-normal to gamma distributions, multifractal scaling, spectral and wavelet properties, and the ability to control extreme-event frequency and dry-patch durations through systematic variation of the mean-reversion and jump parameters.

Significance. If the reproduction of rainfall statistics is shown to be robust under transparent, non-circular parameter estimation with quantitative error metrics and out-of-sample tests, the framework would offer a practical phenomenological tool for generating synthetic rainfall series that capture intermittency and extremes. This could support hydrological risk assessment and studies of stochastic drivers in precipitation, with the parameter-control results providing a tunable handle on distribution shape and event statistics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model calibration and validation] Section on model calibration and validation: The manuscript does not describe the procedure used to estimate the mean-reversion parameter or the jump-diffusion parameters from the NE India data, nor does it report quantitative goodness-of-fit statistics (e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov distances, scaling-exponent uncertainties, or cross-validation errors). Because the central claim of reproducing observed statistics and controlling extremes rests on this validation, the absence of these details leaves open whether agreement is predictive or the result of post-hoc adjustment.
  2. [Results on parameter sweeps] Results section on parameter sweeps and distribution transition: The demonstration that varying the mean-reversion and jump parameters produces a log-normal to gamma transition and controls extreme events and dry-patch durations lacks an explicit, independent criterion for parameter selection (e.g., fitting only to low-order moments and then predicting higher-order statistics). Without this, the control results risk circularity; a concrete strengthening would be to fix parameters from one data subset and test predictive skill on extremes in a disjoint period.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'rain fall' appears as two words; the conventional single-word form 'rainfall' should be used throughout.
  2. [Throughout] Notation: All model parameters (mean-reversion rate, jump intensity, etc.) should be defined with symbols upon first appearance and used consistently in equations and figure legends.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments highlight important aspects of transparency in calibration and validation that will improve the manuscript. We address each major comment below and commit to revisions that provide the requested details and additional tests.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Model calibration and validation] Section on model calibration and validation: The manuscript does not describe the procedure used to estimate the mean-reversion parameter or the jump-diffusion parameters from the NE India data, nor does it report quantitative goodness-of-fit statistics (e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov distances, scaling-exponent uncertainties, or cross-validation errors). Because the central claim of reproducing observed statistics and controlling extremes rests on this validation, the absence of these details leaves open whether agreement is predictive or the result of post-hoc adjustment.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript lacks an explicit description of the parameter estimation procedure and quantitative fit metrics. In the revised version we will insert a dedicated subsection detailing the estimation: the mean-reversion parameter is obtained by fitting the autocorrelation function of the continuous part via least-squares minimization on the discretized Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, while jump intensity, size distribution, and diffusion coefficient are estimated by moment matching on the increments after subtracting the mean-reverting component. We will also report Kolmogorov-Smirnov distances between empirical and simulated distributions, bootstrap standard errors on the scaling exponent, and root-mean-square errors on the power spectrum and wavelet coefficients. These additions will make clear that the reported agreement follows from a systematic, data-driven calibration rather than post-hoc adjustment. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on parameter sweeps] Results section on parameter sweeps and distribution transition: The demonstration that varying the mean-reversion and jump parameters produces a log-normal to gamma transition and controls extreme events and dry-patch durations lacks an explicit, independent criterion for parameter selection (e.g., fitting only to low-order moments and then predicting higher-order statistics). Without this, the control results risk circularity; a concrete strengthening would be to fix parameters from one data subset and test predictive skill on extremes in a disjoint period.

    Authors: We recognize the risk of circularity when parameters are varied after inspecting the full dataset. To strengthen the claim, the revised manuscript will add an out-of-sample test: the mean-reversion and jump parameters will be estimated exclusively from the first half of the NE India record by matching only low-order moments and the autocorrelation structure. The calibrated model will then be used to generate synthetic series whose extreme-event frequency and dry-patch duration statistics are compared quantitatively against the second, disjoint half of the observations. We will report the resulting predictive errors and will retain the original parameter-sweep figures as an illustrative exploration of the model’s sensitivity, now clearly distinguished from the predictive validation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; phenomenological model with direct validation

full rationale

The paper introduces a mean-reverting jump-diffusion stochastic process as a phenomenological tool to generate synthetic rainfall series, fits its parameters to match half-hourly NE India observations, and then uses simulation plus explicit parameter sweeps to reproduce statistics (superdiffusive scaling, log-normal/gamma distributions, extremes, dry spells, multifractal spectra) and explore control. No derivation from first principles is claimed that reduces by construction to the fitted inputs; the central results are obtained by forward simulation and direct comparison to external data rather than by renaming or self-referential prediction. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work appear in the abstract or described structure. The approach is self-contained as a tunable generative model whose outputs are validated against independent observations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of stochastic processes but depends on several free parameters tuned to data and the domain assumption that this model form captures rainfall intermittency.

free parameters (2)
  • mean reversion parameter
    Key parameter varied to control the dynamics and match observed statistics
  • jump diffusion parameters
    Adjusted to reproduce extreme events, dry-patch durations, and distribution transitions
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Rainfall time series can be adequately described by a mean-reverting jump-diffusion stochastic differential equation
    Core modeling choice in the paper

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5443 in / 1242 out tokens · 73253 ms · 2026-05-10T17:23:35.881908+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    95◦E, over a twenty-year period from 2001 to 2020 [ 37]

    05◦E − 94. 95◦E, over a twenty-year period from 2001 to 2020 [ 37]. This region is climatologically significant, as it includes some of the wettest places on Earth. A detailed statistical investigation reveals several im- portant features of the rainfall dynamics. Among these, one of the most crucial observations is that the rainfall intensity follows a Lo...

    work page 2001

  2. [2]

    The details of this numerical implementation are provided in Appendix A

    using the Euler–Maruyama scheme [ 50, 51], which is a standard method for approximating solutions of stochastic differential equations. The details of this numerical implementation are provided in Appendix A. The simulated data obtained from this scheme allows us to compare the model predictions with observed rainfall statistics and validate the effectivene...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Using this stochastic model, we probe dif- ferent parametric regions and investigate the behavior of simulated rainfall time series in those regions

    95◦E) of India from May to October over twenty years (2001 − 2020). Using this stochastic model, we probe dif- ferent parametric regions and investigate the behavior of simulated rainfall time series in those regions. FIG. 2. Temporal evolution of the simulated rainfall data. (a) Time series, (b) Cumulative time series for different rea l- izations (indica...

    work page 2001

  4. [4]

    2(c), where the MSD is plotted as a function of the time lag τ on a log-log scale (solid blue line)

    The results are shown in Fig. 2(c), where the MSD is plotted as a function of the time lag τ on a log-log scale (solid blue line). The MSD exhibits a clear power-law scaling with τ, characterized by an exponent α = 1. 82 ± 0. 04, as indi- cated by the red dotted fitting line. Notably, this expo- nent is in close agreement with the value obtained from the o...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Probability distribution function (PDF) of rain fall In Fig. 3, we present the probability density function (PDF) of the simulated rainfall data in the form of a his- togram (green), along with fitted Gamma (blue) and Log- Normal (red) distributions. The inset shows the same distributions plotted on a log-log scale to better visualiz e the tail behavior. I...

    work page

  6. [6]

    5 mm/half hour, then we call it an extreme event and it is in line with the guidelines set by Indian Meteorological Department [ 54, 55]

    Statistics of extreme events In this work, we consider that during the rainy phase, if the intensity of rain is equal to or greater than 13. 5 mm/half hour, then we call it an extreme event and it is in line with the guidelines set by Indian Meteorological Department [ 54, 55]. The presence extreme events in the rainfall time series suggests the existence...

    work page

  7. [7]

    In practice, rainfall ≤ 0

    Statistics of dry patch A dry patch is defined as a contiguous interval in the rainfall time series during which the precipitation ampli- tude is effectively zero. In practice, rainfall ≤ 0. 1 mm per half-hour is treated as zero, and at least two consec- utive such intervals are required to identify a dry patch. This criterion removes spurious fluctuations a...

    work page

  8. [8]

    A similar trend is observed with increasing variability σ [Figs

    3 half-hour units. A similar trend is observed with increasing variability σ [Figs. 6(d)–(f)], where enhanced fluctuations promote intermittent rainfall events that fragment dry intervals, reducing τ from 47. 6 to 11. 9 half hours. In contrast, increasing the amplitude variability of the arrival process σ1 has only a weak effect, with τ decreas- ing margina...

    work page

  9. [9]

    For rainfall data, the power spectral density (PSD) can reveal both short-term fluctuations and long-term temporal correlations, including the sig- nature of extreme events

    Power spectrum analysis The power spectrum provides a quantitative view of the dominant frequencies present in a time series and of- fers insight into the type of noise and correlations inher- ent in the system. For rainfall data, the power spectral density (PSD) can reveal both short-term fluctuations and long-term temporal correlations, including the sig...

    work page 2000

  10. [10]

    006), while the low-frequency exponent is slightly smaller ( − 0. 19 ± 0. 02) due to the lower prevalence of ex- treme rainfall events in the series. These results indicate that the low-frequency scaling of the PSD is sensitive to the presence of extreme events, while the high-frequency behavior is largely insensitive to the underlying distri- bution. Thu...

    work page

  11. [11]

    To probe these temporal features, we employ wavelet analysis [ 60, 61], which is particularly well-suited for cap- turing localized variations in frequency and amplitude

    Wavelet analysis and Intrinsic mode functions Rainfall is inherently a multiscale phenomenon, ex- hibiting dynamics across a wide range of local time scales. To probe these temporal features, we employ wavelet analysis [ 60, 61], which is particularly well-suited for cap- turing localized variations in frequency and amplitude. Unlike the traditional Fouri...

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    J. D. Neelin, C. Martinez-Villalobos, S. N. Stechmann, F. Ahmed, G. Chen, J. M. Norris, Y.-H. Kuo, and G. Lenderink, Precipitation extremes and water vapor: Relationships in current climate and implications for cli- mate change, Current Climate Change Reports 8, 17 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    M. M. Hasan and P. K. Dunn, A simple poisson–gamma model for modelling rainfall occurrence and amount si- multaneously, Agricultural and forest meteorology 150, 1319 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    Arvind, P

    G. Arvind, P. Ashok Kumar, S. Girish Karthi, and C. Suribabu, Statistical analysis of 30 years rainfall data : a case study, in IOP Conference series: earth and en- vironmental science , Vol. 80 (IOP Publishing, 2017) p. 012067

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Muthiah, S

    M. Muthiah, S. Sivarajan, N. Madasamy, A. Natarajan, and R. Ayyavoo, Analyzing rainfall trends using statisti- cal methods across vaippar basin, tamil nadu, india: A comprehensive study, Sustainability 16, 1957 (2024)

    work page 1957

  16. [16]

    H. Duan, Y. Li, Q. Li, Y. Wang, Y. Xie, and H. Peng, Ap- plication and analysis of machine learning based rainfall prediction, in 2023 8th International Conference on Intel- ligent Computing and Signal Processing (ICSP) (IEEE,

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    S. N. Majumdar, P. von Bomhard, and J. Krug, Exactly solvable record model for rainfall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 158702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    C. M. N. Fall, C. Lavaysse, H. Kerdiles, M. S. Dramé, P. Roudier, and A. T. Gaye, Performance of dry and wet spells combined with remote sensing indicators for crop yield prediction in senegal, Climate Risk Management 33, 100331 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Tichavsk` y, J

    R. Tichavsk` y, J. A. Ballesteros-Cánovas, K. Šilhán, R. Tolasz, and M. Stoffel, Dry spells and extreme pre- cipitation are the main trigger of landslides in central europe, Scientific reports 9, 14560 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    Mandal, R

    S. Mandal, R. Arunkumar, P. A. Breach, and S. P. Si- monovic, Reservoir operations under changing climate conditions: hydropower-production perspective, J. Wa- ter Resour. Plan. Manag. 145, 04019016 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Gouda, S

    K. Gouda, S. Nahak, and P. Goswami, Evaluation of a gcm in seasonal forecasting of extreme rainfall events over continental india, Weather and climate extremes 21, 10 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Yoo and E

    C. Yoo and E. Cho, Comparison of gcm precipitation predictions with their rmses and pattern correlation co- efficients, Water 10, 28 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    J. K. Meher, L. Das, J. Akhter, R. E. Benestad, and A. Mezghani, Performance of cmip3 and cmip5 gcms to simulate observed rainfall characteristics over the western 18 himalayan region, Journal of Climate 30, 7777 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Kurihara, A statistical-dynamical model of the gen- eral circulation of the atmosphere, J

    Y. Kurihara, A statistical-dynamical model of the gen- eral circulation of the atmosphere, J. Atmos. Sci. 27, 847 (1970)

    work page 1970

  25. [25]

    Gowri, K

    L. Gowri, K. Manjula, K. Sasireka, and D. Deepa, Assess- ment of statistical models for rainfall forecasting using machine learning technique, Journal of Soft Computing in Civil Engineering 6, 51 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Abeysingha, K

    N. Abeysingha, K. Kularathna, A. Bandara, and R. L. Ray, Assessment of extreme rainfall through statistical process control-i chart, Journal of Earth System Science 132, 15 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    A. Aieb, K. Lefsih, M. Scarpa, B. Bonaccorso, N. Ci- cero, O. Mimeche, and K. Madani, Statistical modeling of monthly rainfall variability in soummam watershed of algeria, between 1967 and 2018, Natural Resource Mod- eling 33, e12288 (2020)

    work page 1967

  28. [28]

    Demirdjian, Y

    L. Demirdjian, Y. Zhou, and G. J. Huffman, Statisti- cal modeling of extreme precipitation with trmm data, Journal of applied meteorology and climatology 57, 15 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    K. S. Raju and D. N. Kumar, Review of approaches for selection and ensembling of gcms, J. Water Clim. Change 11, 577 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    G. K. Vallis, A statistical-dynamical climate model wi th a simple hydrology cycle, Tellus 34, 211 (1982)

    work page 1982

  31. [31]

    Hasselmann, Stochastic climate models part i

    K. Hasselmann, Stochastic climate models part i. theor y, tellus 28, 473 (1976)

    work page 1976

  32. [32]

    Frankignoul and K

    C. Frankignoul and K. Hasselmann, Stochastic climate models, part ii application to sea-surface temperature anomalies and thermocline variability, Tellus 29, 289 (1977)

    work page 1977

  33. [33]

    Lemke, Stochastic climate models, part 3

    P. Lemke, Stochastic climate models, part 3. applicati on to zonally averaged energy models, Tellus 29, 385 (1977)

    work page 1977

  34. [34]

    P. J. Northrop, Stochastic models of rainfall, Annual R e- view of Statistics and Its Application 11 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    J. L. Ng, S. Abd Aziz, Y. F. Huang, A. Wayayok, and M. Rowshon, Generation of a stochastic precipitation model for the tropical climate, Theoretical and applied climatology 133, 489 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Hassan, S

    Z. Hassan, S. Shamsudin, and S. Harun, Application of sdsm and lars-wg for simulating and downscaling of rain- fall and temperature, Theoretical and applied climatol- ogy 116, 243 (2014)

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    Z. Li, F. Brissette, and J. Chen, Assessing the applica- bility of six precipitation probability distribution mode ls on the loess plateau of china., International Journal of Climatology 34 (2014)

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    C. Gao, M. J. Booij, and Y.-P. Xu, Development and hydrometeorological evaluation of a new stochastic daily rainfall model: Coupling markov chain with rainfall event model, Journal of hydrology 589, 125337 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Zelalem and K

    T. Zelalem and K. Kasiviswanathan, A bayesian mod- elling approach for assessing non-stationarity in annual maximum rainfall under a changing climate, Hydrologi- cal Sciences Journal 68, 1460 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Y. Qin, J. Chen, D. Yang, and T. Wang, Estimating sea- sonally frozen ground depth from historical climate data and site measurements using a bayesian model, Water Resources Research 54, 4361 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    W. Wei, Z. Yan, and P. Jones, Potential predictability of seasonal extreme precipitation accumulation in china, Journal of Hydrometeorology 18, 1071 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    N. M. Alam, S. Mitra, S. K. Pandey, C. Jana, M. Ray, S. Ghosh, S. Paul Mazumdar, S. V. Shankar, R. Saha, and G. Kar, Enhanced spatio-temporal modeling for rain- fall forecasting: A high-resolution grid analysis, Water 16, 1891 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Bassanoni, A

    A. Bassanoni, A. Vezzani, E. Barkai, and R. Burioni, Rare events and single big jump effects in ornstein– uhlenbeck processes, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2025, 043201 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    Eliazar and J

    I. Eliazar and J. Klafter, From ornstein-uhlenbeck dy- namics to long-memory processes and fractional brown- ian motion, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 79, 021115 (2009)

    work page 2009

  45. [45]

    Tong and A

    Z. Tong and A. Liu, A censored ornstein–uhlenbeck pro- cess for rainfall modeling and derivatives pricing, Phys- ica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 566, 125619 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Daly and A

    E. Daly and A. Porporato, Probabilistic dynam- ics of some jump-diffusion systems, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 73, 026108 (2006)

    work page 2006

  47. [47]

    Lefebvre and I

    M. Lefebvre and I. Elmojtaba, First-hitting problems f or jump-diffusion processes with state-dependent uniform jumps, Mathematics 13, 1629 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    GhoshDastider, D

    J. GhoshDastider, D. Pal, and P. K. Mishra, Kolmogorov- like scaling and multifractal complexities in rainfall events, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Ex- periment 2025, 043402 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    H.-K. Cho, K. P. Bowman, and G. R. North, A com- parison of gamma and lognormal distributions for char- acterizing satellite rain rates from the tropical rainfall measuring mission, Journal of Applied meteorology 43, 1586 (2004)

    work page 2004

  50. [50]

    S. A. Amburn, A. S. Lang, and M. A. Buonaiuto, Pre- cipitation forecasting with gamma distribution models for gridded precipitation events in eastern oklahoma and northwestern arkansas, Weather and Forecasting 30, 349 (2015)

    work page 2015

  51. [51]

    Bhavana, R

    C. Bhavana, R. Munirajappa, H. Surendra, and S. RATHOD, Modeling of daily rainfall using gamma probability distribution, Environment and Ecology 30, 884 (2012)

    work page 2012

  52. [52]

    M. E. Rosen, C. P. Grant, and J. Dallon, Mean square displacement for a discrete centroid model of cell motion, Plos one 16, e0261021 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Schirripa Spagnolo and S

    C. Schirripa Spagnolo and S. Luin, Trajectory analysis in single-particle tracking: From mean squared displace- ment to machine learning approaches, International Jour- nal of Molecular Sciences 25, 8660 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Y. He, S. Burov, R. Metzler, and E. Barkai, Random time-scale invariant diffusion and transport coefficients, Physical Review Letters 101, 058101 (2008)

    work page 2008

  55. [55]

    S. B. Alves, G. F. de Oliveira Jr, L. C. de Oliveira, T. P. de Silans, M. Chevrollier, M. Oriá, and H. L. d. S. Cav- alcante, Characterization of diffusion processes: Normal and anomalous regimes, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 447, 392 (2016)

    work page 2016

  56. [56]

    Rincon, P

    F. Rincon, P. Barrère, and T. Roudier, Observational characterisation of large-scale transport and horizontal turbulent diffusivity in the quiet sun, Astronomy & As- trophysics 696, A143 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Y. Tang, S. Inui, Y. Xing, Y. Qi, and W. Guo, Turbulent diffusion and dispersion in a superfluid, Physical Review Research 7, 043215 (2025)

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    Kuttippurath, S

    J. Kuttippurath, S. Murasingh, P. Stott, B. B. Sarojini , 19 M. K. Jha, P. Kumar, P. Nair, H. Varikoden, S. Raj, P. Francis, et al. , Observed rainfall changes in the past century (1901–2019) over the wettest place on earth, En- vironmental Research Letters 16, 024018 (2021)

    work page 1901

  59. [59]

    Nafidi, G

    A. Nafidi, G. Moutabir, and R. Gutiérrez-Sánchez, Stochastic brennan–schwartz diffusion process: Statisti- cal computation and application, Mathematics 7, 1062 (2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    Stübinger and S

    J. Stübinger and S. Endres, Pairs trading with a mean- reverting jump–diffusion model on high-frequency data, Quantitative Finance 18, 1735 (2018)

    work page 2018

  61. [61]

    Wilkie, Numerical methods for stochastic differenti al equations, Phys

    J. Wilkie, Numerical methods for stochastic differenti al equations, Phys. Rev. E 70, 017701 (2004)

    work page 2004

  62. [62]

    Yu, Convergence of relative entropy for euler– maruyama scheme to stochastic differential equations with additive noise, Entropy 26, 232 (2024)

    Y. Yu, Convergence of relative entropy for euler– maruyama scheme to stochastic differential equations with additive noise, Entropy 26, 232 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    Kurniawan, Distribution fitting on rainfall data in jakarta, in IOP Conf

    V. Kurniawan, Distribution fitting on rainfall data in jakarta, in IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. , Vol. 650 (IOP Publishing, 2019) p. 012060

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    B. D. Sagar, Q. Cheng, J. McKinley, and F. Agterberg, Encyclopedia of mathematical geosciences (Springer Na- ture, 2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    Srivastava, G

    A. Srivastava, G. Singh, and O. Singh, Variability and trends in extreme rainfall over india, Mausam 67, 745 (2016)

    work page 2016

  66. [66]

    Bhattacharyya, S

    S. Bhattacharyya, S. Sreekesh, and A. King, Charac- teristics of extreme rainfall in different gridded datasets over india during 1983–2015, Atmospheric Research 267, 105930 (2022)

    work page 1983

  67. [67]

    Singh, A

    S. Singh, A. Saini, and S. Kumar, Trends in extreme rainfall events over northeast india: A novel perspective, Journal of Earth System Science 134, 9 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    P. Saha, R. Mahanta, and B. Goswami, Present and fu- ture of the south asian summer monsoon’s rainy season over northeast india, npj Climate and Atmospheric Sci- ence 6, 170 (2023)

    work page 2023

  69. [69]

    S. Das, R. Mahanta, B. K. Banerjee, and B. Goswami, Changing northeast india summer monsoon onset dy- namics in a warming world, International Journal of Cli- matology , e70211 (2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    Sharma, S

    D. Sharma, S. Das, and B. Goswami, Seasonal prediction of indian summer monsoon extreme rainfall frequency, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science 8, 141 (2025)

    work page 2025

  71. [71]

    Simonsen, A

    I. Simonsen, A. Hansen, and O. M. Nes, Determina- tion of the hurst exponent by use of wavelet transforms, Phys. Rev. E 58, 2779 (1998)

    work page 1998

  72. [72]

    Torrence and G

    C. Torrence and G. P. Compo, A practical guide to wavelet analysis, Bulletin of the American Meteorolog- ical society 79, 61 (1998)

    work page 1998

  73. [73]

    N. E. Huang, S. R. Long, and Z. Shen, The mechanism for frequency downshift in nonlinear wave evolution, Ad- vances in applied mechanics 32, 59 (1996)

    work page 1996

  74. [74]

    N. E. Huang, Z. Shen, S. R. Long, M. C. Wu, H. H. Shih, Q. Zheng, N.-C. Yen, C. C. Tung, and H. H. Liu, The empirical mode decomposition and the hilbert spec- trum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series anal- ysis, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences 454, 903 (1998)

    work page 1998

  75. [75]

    N. E. Huang, Z. Shen, and S. R. Long, A new view of nonlinear water waves: the hilbert spectrum, Annual re- view of fluid mechanics 31, 417 (1999)

    work page 1999

  76. [76]

    E. A. Ihlen, Introduction to multifractal detrended flu c- tuation analysis in matlab, Frontiers in physiology 3, 141 (2012)

    work page 2012

  77. [77]

    Sarker and P

    A. Sarker and P. Mali, Detrended multifractal charac- terization of indian rainfall records, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 151, 111297 (2021)

    work page 2021

  78. [78]

    M. N. Agbazo, G. Koto N’Gobi, E. Alamou, B. Kounouhewa, A. Afouda, et al. , Fractal analysis of the long-term memory in precipitation over bénin (west africa), Advances in Meteorology 2019 (2019)

    work page 2019

  79. [79]

    Dhar, Heat transport in low-dimensional systems, Ad - vances in Physics 57, 457 (2008)

    A. Dhar, Heat transport in low-dimensional systems, Ad - vances in Physics 57, 457 (2008)

    work page 2008

  80. [80]

    Kundu, S

    A. Kundu, S. Sabhapandit, and A. Dhar, Large deviations of heat flow in harmonic chains, J. Stat. Mech.: Theo. and Expt. 2011, P03007 (2011)

    work page 2011