Recognition: unknown
Test of lepton flavour universality with B⁰to K^{*0}ell^+ell^- decays at large dilepton invariant mass
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:55 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
LHCb measures the muon-to-electron branching fraction ratio R_K*0 at 1.08 in B0 to K*0 dilepton decays above 14 GeV2/c4, consistent with the Standard Model.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The paper measures the lepton flavour universality ratio R_K*0 in B0 to K*0 ell+ ell- decays for dilepton invariant mass squared above 14.0 GeV2/c4. With 9 fb-1 of data collected at center-of-mass energies of 7, 8, and 13 TeV, the ratio of branching fractions between the muon and electron channels is determined to be 1.08^{+0.14}_{-0.12} (stat) ± 0.07 (syst). This value is consistent with the Standard Model prediction of approximately one.
What carries the argument
The ratio R_K*0 of branching fractions for the muon and electron modes in the high dilepton-mass region, chosen because many reconstruction and efficiency effects cancel between the two channels.
If this is right
- The measured ratio agrees with the Standard Model expectation of equal rates for the two lepton species.
- No evidence for lepton flavour non-universality appears in this high-mass kinematic region.
- The precision sets a reference point for future tests of the same observable with additional data.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The high-mass result provides a contrast point for lower-mass measurements in related B decays where tensions have been noted elsewhere.
- Additional data from future LHC runs could shrink the uncertainties and test for smaller possible deviations from unity.
- The ratio method used here can be applied to other rare decays to perform similar universality tests at hadron colliders.
Load-bearing premise
Detector efficiencies, background shapes, and reconstruction effects for muons and electrons are assumed to be modeled correctly so that differences cancel in the ratio; any uncancelled bias would shift the measured value.
What would settle it
An independent analysis or larger dataset that yields a ratio value lying outside the quoted uncertainty range after identical selection and efficiency corrections would indicate the consistency with the Standard Model does not hold.
Figures
read the original abstract
Muon-electron universality is tested in $B^0 \to K^{*0} \ \ell^+ \ell^-$ decays, in the dilepton-invariant-mass region above the $\psi(2S)$ resonance. The analysis uses beauty mesons produced in proton-proton collisions recorded by the LHCb detector at center-of-mass energies of 7, 8, and 13 $\text{TeV}$, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 9 $\text{fb}^{-1}$. The ratio of branching fractions between the muon and electron channels, $R_{K^{*0}}$, is measured to be $1.08\,^{+0.14}_{-0.12}\text{(stat)} \ \pm 0.07\text{(syst)}$ for a dilepton-invariant-mass squared above 14.0 $\text{GeV}^{2}/\text{c}^{4}$, consistent with the Standard Model prediction. This result represents the most precise measurement of $R_{K^{*0}}$ in this region and the first such measurement performed at a hadron collider.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper reports a measurement of the lepton flavour universality ratio R_{K^{*0}} in B^0 → K^{*0} ℓ⁺ℓ⁻ decays for dilepton invariant mass squared q² > 14 GeV²/c⁴. Using 9 fb⁻¹ of LHCb pp collision data at 7, 8 and 13 TeV, the ratio of branching fractions between the muon and electron channels is found to be 1.08^{+0.14}_{-0.12}(stat) ± 0.07(syst), consistent with the Standard Model prediction. The result is presented as the most precise measurement in this kinematic region and the first performed at a hadron collider.
Significance. If the central result holds after full verification of efficiency corrections and background modeling, the measurement provides a valuable high-q² test of lepton flavour universality in b → sℓℓ transitions. It complements lower-q² results and demonstrates that a competitive ratio measurement can be performed at a hadron collider with data-driven cancellation of many systematic effects. The absence of free parameters in the final quoted ratio and the direct use of collision data for the observable are strengths.
minor comments (2)
- The abstract states the result is 'consistent with the Standard Model prediction' but does not quote the numerical SM expectation or its uncertainty; adding this value would improve clarity for readers.
- The integrated luminosity is given as 9 fb⁻¹ without breakdown by centre-of-mass energy; a short table or sentence in §2 or §3 would help assess the relative weight of the 13 TeV sample.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation to accept the manuscript. We appreciate the recognition of the measurement's value as a high-q² test of lepton flavour universality in b → sℓℓ transitions and its complementarity to lower-q² results.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: direct experimental ratio measurement
full rationale
The paper reports a direct measurement of the branching-fraction ratio R_{K^{*0}} from proton-proton collision data recorded by LHCb. The central result is obtained by counting signal candidates in the muon and electron channels after applying selection criteria, efficiency corrections, and background subtraction; the ratio is formed explicitly from these observed yields and correction factors. No derivation chain is present that reduces the reported value to a fitted parameter, self-citation, or ansatz by construction. Detector efficiencies and reconstruction effects are modeled with simulation and control samples, but these steps are external to the final ratio and do not create a self-referential loop within the paper's equations. The measurement is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks (collision data) and receives the lowest circularity score.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Standard Model branching fraction ratio equals unity in the absence of new physics
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Physics case for an LHCb Upgrade II — Oppor- tunities in flavour physics, and beyond, in the HL-LHC era,arXiv:1808.08865
-
[2]
Schaelet al.(ALEPH and DELPHI and L3 and OPAL and SLD), Phys
ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD collaborations, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Group, S. Schaelet al.,Pre- cision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance, Phys. Rept.427(2006) 257, arXiv:hep-ex/0509008
-
[3]
ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL collaborations, LEP Electroweak, S. Schaelet al., Electroweak measurements in electron-positron collisions at W-boson-pair energies at LEP, Phys. Rept.532(2013) 119,arXiv:1302.3415
-
[4]
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Angular analysis of the B0 →K ∗0µ+µ− decay using3fb −1 of integrated luminosity, JHEP02(2016) 104,arXiv:1512.04442
- [5]
-
[6]
Wehleet al.,Lepton-Flavor-Dependent Angular Analysis of B→K ∗ℓ+ℓ−, Phys
Belle collaboration, S. Wehleet al.,Lepton-flavor-dependent angular analysis of B→K ∗ℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 111801,arXiv:1612.05014
-
[7]
Aaijet al.,Angular analysis of the B+ →K ∗+µ+µ− decay, Phys
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Angular analysis of the B+ →K ∗+µ+µ− decay, Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 161802,arXiv:2012.13241
-
[8]
Aaijet al.,Measurement of C P-averaged observables in the B0 →K ∗0µ+µ− decay, Phys
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Measurement of C P-averaged observables in the B0 →K ∗0µ+µ− decay, Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 011802,arXiv:2003.04831
-
[9]
Aaijet al.,A comprehensive analysis of the B0 →K ∗0µ+µ− decay,arXiv:2512.18053, Submitted to Phys
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,A comprehensive analysis of the B0 →K ∗0µ+µ− decay,arXiv:2512.18053, Submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett
- [10]
-
[11]
N. Gubernari, M. Reboud, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto,Dispersive analysis of B→K (∗) and Bs →ϕ form factors, JHEP12(2023) 153, Erratum ibid.01(2025) 125, arXiv:2305.06301
-
[12]
S. Descotes-Genon, A. Khodjamirian, J. Virto, and K. K. Vos,Light-cone sum rules forS-waveB→Kπform factors, JHEP06(2023) 034,arXiv:2304.02973
-
[13]
Charm-loop effect in $B \to K^{(*)} \ell^{+} \ell^{-}$ and $B\to K^*\gamma$
A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, A. A. Pivovarov, and Y.-M. Wang,Charm-loop effect inB→K (∗)ℓ+ℓ− andB→K ∗γ, JHEP09(2010) 089,arXiv:1006.4945
work page Pith review arXiv 2010
-
[14]
M. Alguer´ oet al.,To (b)e or not to (b)e: no electrons at LHCb, Eur. Phys. J.C83 (2023) 648,arXiv:2304.07330. 10
-
[15]
G. Isidori, Z. Polonsky, and A. Tinari,Explicit estimate of charm rescattering in B0 →K 0ℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev.D111(2025) 093007,arXiv:2405.17551
-
[16]
S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, and J. Virto,Understanding the B→K ∗µ+µ− anomaly, Phys. Rev.D88(2013) 074002,arXiv:1307.5683
-
[17]
W. Altmannshofer and D. M. Straub,New physics in b→s transitions after LHC Run 1, Eur. Phys. J.C75(2015) 382,arXiv:1411.3161
-
[18]
D. London and J. Matias, B flavour anomalies: 2021 theoretical status report, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.72(2022) 37,arXiv:2110.13270
-
[19]
M. Bordone, G. Isidori, and A. Pattori,On the Standard Model predictions for RK andR K∗, Eur. Phys. J.C76(2016) 440,arXiv:1605.07633
-
[20]
G. Isidori, D. Lancierini, S. Nabeebaccus, and R. Zwicky,QED in B→ Kℓ+ℓ− LFU ratios: theory versus experiment, a Monte Carlo study, JHEP10(2022) 146, arXiv:2205.08635
-
[21]
M. Alguer´ o, J. Matias, B. Capdevila, and A. Crivellin,Disentangling lepton flavor universal and lepton flavor universality violating effects in b→sℓ +ℓ− transitions, Phys. Rev.D105(2022) 113007,arXiv:2205.15212
-
[22]
A. Crivellin, B. Fuks, and L. Schnell,Explaining the hints for lepton flavour universality violation with three S 2 leptoquark generations, JHEP06(2022) 169, arXiv:2203.10111
-
[23]
A. Crivellin and M. Kirk,Diquark explanation of b→sℓ +ℓ−, Phys. Rev.D108(2023) L111701,arXiv:2309.07205
- [24]
-
[25]
B. Allanach,LHC di-lepton searches for Z ′ bosons which explain measurements of b→sℓ +ℓ− transitions, Phys. Lett.B858(2024) 139055,arXiv:2404.14748
-
[26]
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Test of lepton universality using Λ0 b →pK −ℓ+ℓ− decays, JHEP05(2020) 040,arXiv:1912.08139
-
[27]
Aaijet al.[LHCb], Nature Phys.18, no.3, 277-282 (2022) [arXiv:2103.11769 [hep-ex]]
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays, Nature Physics18(2022) 277,arXiv:2103.11769
-
[28]
Wehleet al.,Test of lepton-flavor universality in B→K ∗ℓ+ℓ− decays at Belle, Phys
Belle collaboration, S. Wehleet al.,Test of lepton-flavor universality in B→K ∗ℓ+ℓ− decays at Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 161801,arXiv:1904.02440
-
[29]
Aaijet al.,Tests of lepton universality using B0 →K 0 Sℓ+ℓ− and B+ →K ∗+ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Tests of lepton universality using B0 →K 0 Sℓ+ℓ− and B+ →K ∗+ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 191802, arXiv:2110.09501
-
[30]
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Measurement of lepton universality parameters in B+ →K +ℓ+ℓ− and B0 →K ∗0ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev.D108(2023) 032002, arXiv:2212.09153. 11
-
[31]
Aaijet al.,Test of lepton universality in b→sℓ +ℓ− decays, Phys
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Test of lepton universality in b→sℓ +ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 051803,arXiv:2212.09152
-
[32]
CMS collaboration, A. Hayrapetyanet al.,Test of lepton flavor universality in B± →K ±µ+µ− and B± →K ±e+e− decays in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Rept. Prog. Phys.87(2024) 077802,arXiv:2401.07090
-
[33]
Aaijet al.,Test of lepton flavour universality with B0 s → ϕℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Test of lepton flavour universality with B0 s → ϕℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 121803,arXiv:2410.13748
-
[34]
Aaijet al.,Charmonium production in pNe collisions at√sNN = 68.5GeV, Eur
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Charmonium production in pNe collisions at√sNN = 68.5GeV, Eur. Phys. J.C83(2023) 625,arXiv:2211.11645
-
[35]
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Measurement of the branching fraction ratio RK at large dilepton invariant mass, JHEP07(2025) 198,arXiv:2505.03483
-
[36]
Navaset al.,Review of particle physics, Phys
Particle Data Group, S. Navaset al.,Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev.D110 (2024) 030001
2024
-
[37]
LHCb collaboration, A. A. Alves Jr.et al.,The LHCb Detector at the LHC, JINST 3(2008) S08005
2008
-
[38]
Aaijet al.,LHCb detector performance, Int
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,LHCb Detector Performance, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A30(2015) 1530022,arXiv:1412.6352
-
[39]
Aaijet al.,The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011, JINST8(2013) P04022, arXiv:1211.3055
R. Aaijet al.,The LHCb Trigger and its Performance in 2011, JINST8(2013) P04022,arXiv:1211.3055
- [40]
-
[41]
Likhomanenkoet al.,LHCb topological trigger reoptimization, J
T. Likhomanenkoet al.,LHCb topological trigger reoptimization, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 664(2015) 082025,arXiv:1510.00572
-
[42]
N. Grieseret al.,The LHCb stripping project: Sustainable legacy data processing for high-energy physics, Comput. Softw. Big. Sci.9(2025) 21,arXiv:2509.05294
-
[43]
A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1
T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands,A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun.178(2008) 852, arXiv:0710.3820; T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands,PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual, JHEP05(2006) 026, arXiv:hep-ph/0603175
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2008
-
[44]
Belyaevet al.,Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss, the LHCb simulation framework, J
I. Belyaevet al.,Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss, the LHCb simulation framework, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.331(2011) 032047
2011
-
[45]
D. J. Lange,The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A462(2001) 152
2001
-
[46]
N. Davidson, T. Przedzinski, and Z. Was,PHOTOS interface in C++: Technical and physics documentation, Comput. Phys. Commun.199(2016) 86, arXiv:1011.0937. 12
-
[47]
Allisonet al.,Geant4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans
Geant4 collaboration, J. Allisonet al.,Geant4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.53(2006) 270; Geant4 collaboration, S. Agostinelliet al.,Geant4: A simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A506(2003) 250
2006
-
[48]
Clemencicet al.,The LHCb simulation application, Gauss: Design, evolution and experience, J
M. Clemencicet al.,The LHCb simulation application, Gauss: Design, evolution and experience, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.331(2011) 032023
2011
-
[49]
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Comprehensive analysis of local and nonlocal amplitudes in the B0 →K ∗0µ+µ− decay, JHEP09(2024) 026, Erratum ibid.05 (2025) 208,arXiv:2405.17347
-
[50]
Skwarnicki,A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-prime and Upsilon resonances, PhD thesis, Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow, 1986, DESY-F31-86-02
T. Skwarnicki,A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-prime and Upsilon resonances, PhD thesis, Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow, 1986, DESY-F31-86-02
1986
-
[51]
Aaijet al.,Test of lepton flavor universality with B+ →K +π+π−ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Test of lepton flavor universality with B+ →K +π+π−ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 181803, arXiv:2412.11645
-
[52]
Anderliniet al.,The PIDCalib package, LHCb-PUB-2016-021, 2016
L. Anderliniet al.,The PIDCalib package, LHCb-PUB-2016-021, 2016
2016
-
[53]
R. Aaijet al.,Selection and processing of calibration samples to measure the particle identification performance of the LHCb experiment in Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. Tech. Instr.6(2019) 1,arXiv:1803.00824
- [54]
-
[55]
Aaijet al.,The LHCb Upgrade I, JINST19(2024) P05065, arXiv:2305.10515
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,The LHCb Upgrade I, JINST19(2024) P05065, arXiv:2305.10515. 13 LHCb collaboration R. Aaij38 , M. Abdelfatah 69, A.S.W. Abdelmotteleb 57 , C. Abellan Beteta 51 , F. Abudin´ en59 , T. Ackernley61 , A. A. Adefisoye 69 , B. Adeva47 , M. Adinolfi55 , P. Adlarson87 , C. Agapopoulou 14 , C.A. Aidala 89 , Z. Ajaltouni 11, S. Akar...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.