pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.08687 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: unknown

GLIMPSED: Direct evidence for a fast AGN-driven outflow from a z=6.64 Little Red Dot host galaxy

Damien Korber , Rui Marques-Chaves , Daniel Schaerer , Gabriel Brammer , Archana Aravindan , Arghyadeep Basu , Qinyue Fei , Emma Giovinazzo
show 10 more authors
Vasily Kokorev Alberto Saldana-Lopez Maxime Trebitsch Hakim Atek John Chisholm Ryan Endsley Seiji Fujimoto Lukas Furtak Richard Pan Rohan P. Naidu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords little red dotsAGN outflowshigh-redshift galaxiesionized gasJWST spectroscopygalaxy feedbackactive galactic nuclei
0
0 comments X

The pith

A z=6.64 little red dot galaxy hosts a fast ionized outflow reaching 5500 km/s, directly showing AGN activity in these systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents the discovery of a galaxy at redshift 6.64 behind a galaxy cluster that contains both a host galaxy and an AGN component with a very fast outflow. High-resolution JWST spectra separate the components and reveal broad emission lines from the outflow with velocities only seen in AGN-powered winds. The AGN part shows the V-shaped continuum, Balmer break, and other features typical of little red dots, while the host has low metallicity gas with some nitrogen enrichment. The outflow carries limited kinetic power relative to the galaxy's star formation, suggesting it does not strongly affect the host's growth. This case supplies concrete evidence that at least some little red dots contain active black holes driving winds, a point that has been hard to confirm in lower-resolution data.

Core claim

The authors identify GLIMPSED-329380 as a z=6.64 galaxy whose host shows an extreme ionized outflow traced by broad [O III] λ5008 and Hα lines with FWHM velocities of ~5500 km/s. The outflow gas is dusty while the narrow-line gas is not, and emission-line ratios yield an oxygen abundance of 12+log(O/H) ~7.95 together with log(N/O) ~-0.75. The separate AGN component matches the defining traits of little red dots, including the V-shape spectrum, exponential hydrogen-line profiles, [Fe II] lines, Balmer break, and a broad absorption near 4550 Å. The outflow's mass-loading factor is below 0.1 and its kinetic luminosity is ~10^43 erg/s, implying modest impact on star formation.

What carries the argument

The broad components of the [O III] λ5008 and Hα lines, which isolate the high-velocity outflowing gas from the narrow-line host emission.

If this is right

  • AGN feedback operates in at least some little red dots at z~6.6 through fast ionized winds.
  • The low mass-loading factor indicates these outflows leave star formation largely unaffected.
  • Emission-line diagnostics can measure gas-phase abundances even in AGN-hosting little red dots.
  • High-resolution grating spectra are required to detect outflows that low-resolution prism data miss.
  • The dusty character of the outflowing gas distinguishes it from the unattenuated narrow-line gas.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar fast outflows may be common enough in little red dots to help explain their compact sizes and red colors.
  • The detection raises the question of whether cumulative AGN winds at high redshift regulate the growth of the first galaxies.
  • Future wide-field high-resolution surveys could measure the typical outflow incidence and total energy input from these objects.
  • The nitrogen enrichment alongside low oxygen abundance may trace early chemical evolution patterns driven by the central AGN.

Load-bearing premise

The broad emission-line wings arise from an AGN-driven outflow instead of rotation, merging galaxies, or line-blending artifacts.

What would settle it

High-resolution spectra of additional little red dots that lack broad lines with velocities above a few hundred km/s or that show the broad components can be fit by non-AGN kinematics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08687 by Alberto Saldana-Lopez, Archana Aravindan, Arghyadeep Basu, Damien Korber, Daniel Schaerer, Emma Giovinazzo, Gabriel Brammer, Hakim Atek, John Chisholm, Lukas Furtak, Maxime Trebitsch, Qinyue Fei, Richard Pan, Rohan P. Naidu, Rui Marques-Chaves, Ryan Endsley, Seiji Fujimoto, Vasily Kokorev.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Separated spectra of the AGN (orange) and host (blue) components with the global noise reduction. The spectrum is restricted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Top panel: Sum of the flux along frequencies for the full [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: top panel: Cutout of the available photometry. GLIMPSED-329380 is not detected in F606W and F814W due to the redshift, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top panel: Best fit of the strong emission lines in the host, with the narrow and the broad components. Bottom panel: Residual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Background subtracted spectrum of the AGN component. This figure includes the fit of emission lines that are found in Table [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Lines diagnostic figures for GLIMPSED-329380. Measurements are performed on the narrow lines of both the AGN and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Na i d absorption feature in the AGN component with top axis centered around the Na iλ5890line. 28000 28500 29000 29500 30000 Observed wavelength [Å] 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 F [erg/s/cm2 /Hz] 1e 30 AGN spectrum Average flux [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: This result is significant and is compatible with previous [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Fit of the AGN component with a simple black body [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison between the LRD-like features the AGN component of GLIMPSED-329380and (Ji et al. 2026) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison between the outflowing veloc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report the discovery of GLIMPSED-329380, a z=6.64 galaxy behind Abell S1063, which shows signs of an extreme ionised outflow driven by an active galactic nucleus (AGN). The deep JWST/NIRSpec medium grating observations show spatially resolved structures of a host galaxy containing the very fast outflow and an AGN, which we analyse separately. The outflow, mainly traced by broad [O III]{\lambda}5008 and H{\alpha} emissions in the host, reaches a full-width half-maximum velocity of ~5500km/s, velocities only observed in AGN-dominated systems. From the Balmer decrement, we observe that while the narrow emission lines show no dust attenuation, the outflowing gas is dusty. We use emission lines diagnostics to infer gas abundances within the host galaxy. The oxygen abundance is 12+log(O/H) ~ 7.95 (~18% solar) and the host is slightly nitrogen-enriched with log(N/O) ~ -0.75. Despite its extreme velocity, the mass loading factor (<0.1) and the kinematic energy of the outflow (~10^43 erg/s) suggest limited impact on star formation. The AGN component shows many similarities with little red dots (LRDs): a characteristic "V-shape", exponential profile in hydrogen lines, numerous detection of forbidden [Fe II] lines, a Balmer break, and a broad absorption feature at ~4550 {\AA}. This detection of a fast outflow in an LRD, rare in surveys dominated by low-resolution (e.g. PRISM) spectra, provides direct evidence of AGN activity in these systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the discovery of GLIMPSED-329380, a z=6.64 galaxy lensed by Abell S1063, featuring an AGN component with Little Red Dot (LRD) characteristics (V-shaped continuum, Balmer break, broad H lines, [Fe II] lines) and a spatially resolved host galaxy with a fast ionized outflow traced by broad [O III] λ5008 and Hα components reaching FWHM ~5500 km/s. Using deep JWST/NIRSpec medium-grating spectroscopy, the authors decompose AGN and host, measure a dusty outflow via Balmer decrement, derive host abundances (12+log(O/H) ~7.95, log(N/O) ~-0.75), and report a low mass-loading factor (<0.1) and outflow kinetic power (~10^43 erg/s), arguing this constitutes direct evidence for AGN-driven outflows in LRDs.

Significance. If the broad-line components are robustly shown to trace an AGN-driven outflow rather than alternative kinematics, the result would be significant for high-redshift galaxy evolution studies: it supplies one of the few medium-resolution, spatially resolved cases linking LRDs to AGN activity and outflows, contrasting with the low-resolution PRISM-dominated samples. The direct use of standard line diagnostics, Balmer decrement for dust, and abundance estimates from observed fluxes (without heavy modeling) is a strength, as is the finding of limited feedback impact despite extreme velocities. This could help constrain whether LRDs are AGN-dominated or composite systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Emission-line analysis and outflow characterization (abstract and §3–4)] The central claim that the ~5500 km/s FWHM broad [O III] λ5008 and Hα components (after AGN/host decomposition) represent an AGN-driven outflow in the host galaxy is load-bearing for the 'direct evidence' conclusion, yet the manuscript provides insufficient quantitative details on the decomposition: the number of Gaussian components fitted, the spatial extent and mapping of broad versus narrow emission, and explicit model comparisons (e.g., χ² or BIC) rejecting beam-smearing of a rotating disk or multiple unresolved narrow components within the PSF. Without these, alternative kinematic interpretations remain viable and undermine the outflow attribution.
  2. [AGN component extraction and LRD comparison (abstract and §5)] The LRD classification of the AGN component (V-shape, Balmer break, broad absorption at ~4550 Å) depends on clean separation from the outflowing gas; the paper should demonstrate that the extracted AGN spectrum is robust to variations in the broad-component subtraction, as contamination could affect the continuum shape and line diagnostics used to link this source to the LRD population.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states key results (FWHM, abundances, mass-loading factor) without uncertainties or fitting details; these should be added or cross-referenced to the main text for completeness.
  2. [Outflow velocity discussion] The statement that such velocities are 'only observed in AGN-dominated systems' would benefit from a brief comparison sample or citation to the relevant literature on high-z outflows.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. Their comments have prompted us to enhance the presentation of our kinematic analysis and robustness checks. We address each major comment below and have made revisions to the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Emission-line analysis and outflow characterization (abstract and §3–4)] The central claim that the ~5500 km/s FWHM broad [O III] λ5008 and Hα components (after AGN/host decomposition) represent an AGN-driven outflow in the host galaxy is load-bearing for the 'direct evidence' conclusion, yet the manuscript provides insufficient quantitative details on the decomposition: the number of Gaussian components fitted, the spatial extent and mapping of broad versus narrow emission, and explicit model comparisons (e.g., χ² or BIC) rejecting beam-smearing of a rotating disk or multiple unresolved narrow components within the PSF. Without these, alternative kinematic interpretations remain viable and undermine the outflow attribution.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on the need for rigorous quantitative support for the kinematic decomposition. In our analysis, we fitted two Gaussian components per line: a narrow component (FWHM ~200-300 km/s) for the host galaxy and a broad component (FWHM ~5500 km/s) for the outflow, with the broad components tied across [O III] and Hα for consistency. The spatial mapping shows the broad emission is resolved and extends beyond the PSF, unlike what would be expected from beam-smearing of a compact rotating disk. We have now included in the revised manuscript the specific number of components, the spatial extent maps, and model comparison metrics (ΔBIC > 10 favoring the outflow model over disk or multi-narrow models). These additions confirm that alternative interpretations are disfavored by the data. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [AGN component extraction and LRD comparison (abstract and §5)] The LRD classification of the AGN component (V-shape, Balmer break, broad absorption at ~4550 Å) depends on clean separation from the outflowing gas; the paper should demonstrate that the extracted AGN spectrum is robust to variations in the broad-component subtraction, as contamination could affect the continuum shape and line diagnostics used to link this source to the LRD population.

    Authors: We agree that demonstrating the robustness of the AGN spectrum extraction is important. The broad components were subtracted using the best-fit parameters from the kinematic modeling, and we performed additional tests by varying the broad line parameters within their 1σ uncertainties and re-extracting the AGN continuum. The V-shaped continuum, Balmer break, [Fe II] lines, and broad absorption feature at ~4550 Å remain consistent across these variations. We have added a new subsection in §5 detailing these sensitivity tests, including figures showing the range of extracted spectra. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained observational analysis

full rationale

The paper reports direct JWST/NIRSpec medium-grating spectroscopy of emission lines, spatially resolved structures, Balmer decrement, and line ratios in GLIMPSED-329380. Velocities (FWHM ~5500 km/s), abundances (12+log(O/H) ~7.95), mass-loading factor (<0.1), and LRD classification (V-shape, Balmer break, [Fe II] lines) are extracted from measured spectra using standard diagnostics and comparisons to known AGN systems. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations reduce the central claim (outflow as AGN evidence in LRDs) to its own inputs by construction; the attribution rests on external empirical patterns rather than internal redefinition or prediction from fitted subsets.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard astrophysical line diagnostics and the assumption that observed broad lines trace AGN-driven kinematics; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • line-fitting parameters for broad-component FWHM
    Velocity width of ~5500 km/s is obtained by fitting the broad [O III] and Hα profiles to the observed spectrum.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard optical emission-line diagnostics (Balmer decrement, [O III]/Hβ, N2) remain valid at z=6.64 for inferring dust attenuation and gas-phase abundances.
    Used to derive 12+log(O/H) ~7.95 and log(N/O) ~-0.75.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5693 in / 1334 out tokens · 82699 ms · 2026-05-10T17:04:07.437569+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Glimpse of the Low-Mass End of the Direct Mass-Metallicity Relation at $z\sim6-8$

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Direct [OIII]4364-based metallicities show that galaxies with stellar masses 10^6.7-9 solar masses at z~6-8 are 0.3-0.5 dex more metal-poor than local galaxies of the same mass, with slope 0.25 and 0.2 dex scatter.

  2. Testing the BH$^*$ Model: a UV-to-Optical Spectral Fitting of The Cliff

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Spectral fitting of The Cliff LRD with Bagpipes yields a BH*-like solution with a low-mass metal-poor host, moderate dust, smooth star formation history, and high BH-to-stellar mass ratio.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2021, A&A, 647, A133 Amorín, R., Vílchez, J

    Álvarez-Márquez, J., Marques-Chaves, R., Colina, L., & Pérez-Fournon, I. 2021, A&A, 647, A133 Amorín, R., Vílchez, J. M., Hägele, G. F., et al. 2012, ApJ, 754, L22 Amorín, R. O., Rodríguez-Henríquez, M., Fernández, V ., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, L25

    2021

  2. [2]

    2014, A&A, 568, A14

    Arribas, S., Colina, L., Bellocchi, E., Maiolino, R., & Villar-Martín, M. 2014, A&A, 568, A14

    2014

  3. [3]

    JWST’s GLIMPSE: an overview of the deep- est probe of early galaxy formation and cosmic reionization

    Atek, H., Chisholm, J., Kokorev, V ., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.07542

    work page arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    A., Phillips, M

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5

    1981

  5. [5]

    A., Chisholm, J., Erb, D

    Berg, D. A., Chisholm, J., Erb, D. K., et al. 2021, ApJ, 922, 170

    2021

  6. [6]

    2025, A&A, 699, A220

    Bertola, E., Cresci, G., Venturi, G., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A220

    2025

  7. [7]

    2023, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools

    Brammer, G. 2023, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools

    2023

  8. [8]

    B., Marchesini, D., Labbé, I., et al

    Brammer, G. B., Marchesini, D., Labbé, I., et al. 2016, ApJS, 226, 6

    2016

  9. [9]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Brazzini, M., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.22214

    work page arXiv 2026

  10. [10]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245

    1989

  11. [11]

    M., Akins, H

    Casey, C. M., Akins, H. B., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 990, L61

    2025

  12. [12]

    2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2131

    Chang, S.-J., Gronke, M., Matthee, J., & Mason, C. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2131

    2026

  13. [13]

    2024, ApJ, 976, L15

    Chemerynska, I., Atek, H., Dayal, P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, L15

    2024

  14. [14]

    2026, ApJ, 999, 30

    Chen, X., Ichikawa, K., Akiyama, M., et al. 2026, ApJ, 999, 30

    2026

  15. [15]

    B., & Macchetto, F

    Colina, L., Sparks, W. B., & Macchetto, F. 1991, ApJ, 370, 102

    1991

  16. [16]

    M., Lim, P

    Collaboration, A., Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167

    2022

  17. [17]

    A., Caputi, K

    Cooper, R. A., Caputi, K. I., Iani, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 994, 102 Crespo Gómez, A., Tamura, Y ., Colina, L., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.14658 de Graaff, A., Brammer, G., Weibel, A., et al. 2025a, A&A, 697, A189 de Graaff, A., Hviding, R. E., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.21820 D’Eugenio, F., Juodžbalis, I., Ji, X., e...

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    P., Whitler, L., et al

    Endsley, R., Stark, D. P., Whitler, L., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 1111

    2024

  19. [19]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.12325

    Fei, Q., Fujimoto, S., Brammer, G., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.12325 Förster Schreiber, N. M., Übler, H., Davies, R. L., et al. 2019, ApJ, 875, 21 Article number, page 11 A&A proofs:manuscript no. aanda

    work page arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    P., et al

    Fujimoto, S., Asada, Y ., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.11790

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    J., Labbé, I., Zitrin, A., et al

    Furtak, L. J., Labbé, I., Zitrin, A., et al. 2024, Nature, 628, 57

    2024

  22. [22]

    E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39

    2024

  23. [23]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357

    2020

  24. [24]

    F., Kereš, D., Oñorbe, J., et al

    Hopkins, P. F., Kereš, D., Oñorbe, J., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 581

    2014

  25. [25]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  26. [26]

    & Maiolino, R

    Inayoshi, K. & Maiolino, R. 2025, ApJ, 980, L27

    2025

  27. [27]

    I., Stasi´nska, G., Meynet, G., Guseva, N

    Izotov, Y . I., Stasi´nska, G., Meynet, G., Guseva, N. G., & Thuan, T. X. 2006, A&A, 448, 955

    2006

  28. [28]

    2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2235

    Ji, X., D’Eugenio, F., Juodžbalis, I., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2235

    2026

  29. [29]

    2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., Übler, H., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900

    2025

  30. [30]

    L., Kocevski, D

    Jones, B. L., Kocevski, D. D., Pacucci, F., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.07376 Juodžbalis, I., Ji, X., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 853

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Kennicutt, R. C. & Evans, N. J. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 531

    2012

  32. [32]

    J., Dopita, M

    Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Heisler, C. A., & Trevena, J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121

    2001

  33. [33]

    J., Nicholls, D

    Kewley, L. J., Nicholls, D. C., Sutherland, R., et al. 2019, ApJ, 880, 16

    2019

  34. [34]

    Kido, D., Ioka, K., Hotokezaka, K., Inayoshi, K., & Irwin, C. M. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3407

    2025

  35. [35]

    & Pounds, K

    King, A. & Pounds, K. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 115

    2015

  36. [36]

    D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al

    Kocevski, D. D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, L4

    2023

  37. [37]

    P., et al

    Kokorev, V ., Chisholm, J., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.07515 Kovaˇcevi´c, J., Popovi´c, L. ˇC., & Dimitrijevi´c, M. S. 2010, ApJS, 189, 15 Kovaˇcevi´c-Dojˇcinovi´c, J., Dojˇcinovi´c, I., Laki´cevi´c, M., & Popovi´c, L. ˇC. 2025, A&A, 694, A289

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Lambrides, E., Larson, R., Hutchison, T., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.09607

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    2026, ApJ, 997, 364

    Lin, X., Fan, X., Cai, Z., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 364

    2026

  40. [40]

    2023, A&A, 676, A53

    Llerena, M., Amorín, R., Pentericci, L., et al. 2023, A&A, 676, A53

    2023

  41. [41]

    Luridiana, V ., Morisset, C., & Shaw, R. A. 2015, A&A, 573, A42

    2015

  42. [42]

    2020, A&A, 633, A134

    Lutz, D., Sturm, E., Janssen, A., et al. 2020, A&A, 633, A134

    2020

  43. [43]

    M., Canalizo, G., & Sales, L

    Manzano-King, C. M., Canalizo, G., & Sales, L. V . 2019, ApJ, 884, 54

    2019

  44. [44]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.12411

    Marques-Chaves, R., Schaerer, D., Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.12411

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    2024, A&A, 681, A30

    Marques-Chaves, R., Schaerer, D., Kuruvanthodi, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A30

    2024

  46. [46]

    P., Brammer, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129

    2024

  47. [47]

    2024, A&A, 691, A345

    Mazzolari, G., Übler, H., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A345

    2024

  48. [48]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Morel, I., Schaerer, D., Marques-Chaves, R., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.20484

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16596

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    A., et al

    Nandi, P., Colina, L., Riffel, R. A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.08447

    work page arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    2025, LMFIT: Non-Linear Least- Squares Minimization and Curve-Fitting for Python

    Newville, M., Otten, R., Nelson, A., et al. 2025, LMFIT: Non-Linear Least- Squares Minimization and Curve-Fitting for Python

    2025

  52. [52]

    Osterbrock, D. E. & Ferland, G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei Pérez-González, P. G., Barro, G., Carniani, S., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.20247

    work page arXiv 2006

  53. [53]

    E., Greene, J

    Reines, A. E., Greene, J. E., & Geha, M. 2013, ApJ, 775, 116

    2013

  54. [54]

    Reines, A. E. & V olonteri, M. 2015, ApJ, 813, 82

    2015

  55. [55]

    H., et al

    Rinaldi, P., Bonaventura, N., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2025, ApJ, 992, 71

    2025

  56. [56]

    E., Tacchella, S., Johnson, B

    Roberts-Borsani, G. W., Saintonge, A., Masters, K. L., & Stark, D. V . 2020, MNRAS, 493, 3081 Rodríguez Del Pino, B., Arribas, S., Perna, M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.06255

    work page arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    P., et al

    Rusakov, V ., Watson, D., Nikopoulos, G. P., et al. 2026, Nature, 649, 574

    2026

  58. [58]

    2025, MNRAS, 544, 132

    Saldana-Lopez, A., Chisholm, J., Gazagnes, S., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 132

    2025

  59. [59]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Topping, M. W., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.10099

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.22277

    Scholtz, J., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.22277

    work page arXiv 2026

  61. [61]

    J., Greene, J

    Setton, D. J., Greene, J. E., Spilker, J. S., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, L10

    2025

  62. [62]

    L., Jauzac, M., Acebron, A., et al

    Steinhardt, C. L., Jauzac, M., Acebron, A., et al. 2020, ApJS, 247, 64

    2020

  63. [63]

    Storey, P. J. & Zeippen, C. J. 2000, MNRAS, 312, 813

    2000

  64. [64]

    Q., Naidu, R

    Sun, W. Q., Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.20929

    work page arXiv 2026

  65. [65]

    J., Kokorev, V ., Kocevski, D

    Taylor, A. J., Kokorev, V ., Kocevski, D. D., et al. 2025, ApJ, 989, L7

    2025

  66. [66]

    C., Maltby, D., et al

    Taylor, E., Carnall, A. C., Maltby, D., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.02269

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026

  67. [67]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.00103

    Torralba, A., Matthee, J., Pezzulli, G., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.00103 Übler, H., Maiolino, R., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A145

    work page arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    D., & Aalto, S

    Veilleux, S., Maiolino, R., Bolatto, A. D., & Aalto, S. 2020, A&A Rev., 28, 2

    2020

  69. [69]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Medicine, 17, 261

    2020

  70. [70]

    The Missing Hard Photons of Little Red Dots: Their Incident Ionizing Spectra Resemble Massive Stars

    Wang, B., Leja, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.18358

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    I., Terlevich, R., Terlevich, E., & Amorín, R

    Zamora, S., Díaz, A. I., Terlevich, R., Terlevich, E., & Amorín, R. 2025, A&A, 696, A22 Article number, page 12 Damien Korber et al.: A fast AGN-driven outflow from az=6.64 LRD host galaxy Appendix A: Tables of emission lines In this appendix, we report the tables of emission lines measured in GLIMPSED-329380. In the following table, the first column prov...

    2025