pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.06770 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A Glimpse of the Low-Mass End of the Direct Mass-Metallicity Relation at zsim6-8

Tiger Yu-Yang Hsiao , John Chisholm , Danielle A. Berg , Steven L. Finkelstein , Vasily Kokorev , Hakim Atek , Rohan P. Naidu , Seiji Fujimoto
show 17 more authors
Lukas J. Furtak Angela Adamo Archana Aravindan Yoshihisa Asada Arghyadeep Basu Jeremy Blaizot Nicholas Choustikov Miroslava Dessauges-Zavadsky Qinyue Fei Harley Katz Damien Korber Kristen. B. W. McQuinn Marcie Mun Julian B. Munoz Priyamvada Natarajan Mabel G. Stephenson Daniel Schaerer
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 00:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords mass-metallicity relationdirect metallicityhigh-redshift galaxiesJWST spectroscopychemical enrichmentlow-mass galaxiesauroral linesgalaxy evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Galaxies at z~6-8 with masses of 10 million to a billion solar masses have metallicities 0.3-0.5 dex lower than local galaxies at the same mass.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses deep JWST/NIRSpec observations of a lensed field to detect the [OIII] lambda 4364 auroral line in eight galaxies at redshift 6 to 8. This allows direct metallicity measurements down to stellar masses of about 10 million solar masses. Combining these with other literature detections gives a sample of 21 galaxies whose mass-metallicity relation lies 0.3-0.5 dex below the local relation, with a comparable slope of 0.25 plus or minus 0.10 but larger scatter of 0.2 dex. The offset is attributed to denser gas-rich conditions and ongoing inflows of metal-poor gas that dilute the interstellar medium. Readers would care because these are the first direct abundance measurements at the low-mass end of the high-redshift mass-metallicity relation, showing how chemical enrichment differed in the early universe.

Core claim

We identify eight [OIII] lambda 4364 emitters at z~6-8, enabling direct metallicity measurements for galaxies with stellar masses from 10 to the 6.7 to 10 to the 9 solar masses. By combining our sample and galaxies with [OIII] lambda 4364 detections from the literature, we calculate direct metallicities for 21 galaxies. We fit the MZR at 10 to the 6.7-9 solar masses with 0.3-0.5 dex lower metallicity than local galaxies at similar stellar mass. We find the slope to be 0.25 plus or minus 0.10, comparable to the local MZR, and the MZR exhibits a scatter of about 0.2 dex, which is larger than the local MZR. The lower metallicities may reflect denser, more gas-rich early environments, with the M

What carries the argument

The temperature-sensitive [OIII] lambda 4364 auroral line, which enables direct metallicity measurements from gas temperature without strong-line calibrations.

If this is right

  • The slope of the mass-metallicity relation at z~6-8 is already similar to the local slope, indicating that the basic mass dependence of metal retention is set early.
  • The larger scatter of 0.2 dex suggests more variable enrichment and dilution histories in low-mass high-redshift galaxies.
  • Extremely high electron densities can cause metallicities to be underestimated by up to 0.5 dex if lower densities are assumed in the analysis.
  • Continuous inflow of metal-poor gas is needed to explain the lower metallicities in these denser early environments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Galaxy formation models would need to include higher gas fractions or more efficient dilution by pristine gas to reproduce the observed offset at early times.
  • The increased scatter may correlate with other properties such as star-formation rate or merger history that could be checked with additional kinematic data.
  • Extending direct measurements to still lower masses could reveal whether the relation flattens further or breaks at the smallest scales.

Load-bearing premise

The small sample of lensed galaxies is representative of the general low-mass population at z~6-8 and the [OIII] lambda 4364 detections yield unbiased direct metallicities even at electron densities above 10 to the 5 per cubic centimeter.

What would settle it

A larger sample of low-mass galaxies at z~6-8 observed to similar depth and showing metallicities consistent with the local mass-metallicity relation at the same stellar masses would falsify the reported offset.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06770 by Angela Adamo, Archana Aravindan, Arghyadeep Basu, Damien Korber, Danielle A. Berg, Daniel Schaerer, Hakim Atek, Harley Katz, Jeremy Blaizot, John Chisholm, Julian B. Munoz, Kristen. B. W. McQuinn, Lukas J. Furtak, Mabel G. Stephenson, Marcie Mun, Miroslava Dessauges-Zavadsky, Nicholas Choustikov, Priyamvada Natarajan, Qinyue Fei, Rohan P. Naidu, Seiji Fujimoto, Steven L. Finkelstein, Tiger Yu-Yang Hsiao, Vasily Kokorev, Yoshihisa Asada.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: GLIMPSE-D [O iii] λ4364 emitter spectra shown in the black curves and the fits are shown in orange curves. The top panels show [O iii] λ4364 as well as Hγ in each [O iii] λ4364 emitter. The bottom panel illustrates a deep G395M spectrum of one of the [O iii] λ4364 emitters: GLIMPSE-45572, demonstrating the power of GLIMPSE-D. Emission lines are labeled with the dotted lines, including [O ii] λλ3727,3730, [… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A Bagpipes SED fitting to GLIMPSE-12801. Colorful squares are model photometry while the black points are observed photometry. The orange curve shows the Bagpipes fit and the gray triangles are the upper limits where are undetected photometry. We adopt a strong gravitational lensing model to correct the estimated stellar mass and SFR (see §4). The details of the model can be found in Atek et al. (2025) and… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: 12+log(O/H) vs 12+log(O++/H) as a pseudo ICF. The literature (the light orange circles) and GLIMPSE￾D [O iii] λ4364 emitters with detected [O ii] λλ3727,3730 (the dark orange stars) are used to fit the relation presented in the orange dashed line. 12+log(O/H) of GLIMPSE-D [O iii] λ4364 emitters without detected [O ii] λλ3727,3730 are obtained adopting the orange relations, demonstrated in the white stars. … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Strong-Line diagnostics of the z ∼ 6 − 8 Auroral Sample at 6 < z < 8. The literature data are shown in the light-orange circles and the GLIMPSE-D [O iii] λ4364 emitters are presented in the dark-orange stars. For comparison, we show the strong-line diagnostics derived from a larger sample size spanning z ∼ 2 − 9 from Sanders et al. (2024) (the black dashed lines) and Sanders et al. (2025) (the blue lines),… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Mass-metallicity relation using direct Te method of the z ∼ 6 − 8 Auroral Sample at 6 < z < 8. GLIMPSE￾D [O iii] λ4364 emitters are shown in the dark-orange stars while the literature [O iii] λ4364 emitters are presented in the light-orange circles. The linear fit to the MZR is shown in the orange solid line, and the orange dashed line indicates the extrapolation from the fit. The orange shaded region high… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Our fitted MZR at z ∼ 6 − 8 compared to observations (left panel) and simulations (right panel). Left panel: We compared the MZR to the local MZR (the green line; Berg et al. 2012), and other high-z observations: Heintz et al. 2023 (7 < z < 10; the magenta line), Curti et al. 2024 (6 < z < 10; the light-green line), Morishita et al. 2024 (3 < z < 9.5; the yellow line), Chemerynska et al. 2024 (6 < z < 8; t… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Variations of MZR, where the dark-orange stars show GLIMPSE-D data while the light-orange circles are literature data. The linear fits are the fit to the direct MZR in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Top panel: MZR under different electron den￾sity assumptions. ne = 102 and 105 cm−3 are shown in brown stars (GLIMPSE-D), and orange circles (literature), with dif￾ferent transparency and sizes, from light to dark and small to large. Bottom panel: Strong-line diagnostic of R3 un￾der different electron density assumptions. Similar as top panel, ne = 102 and 105 cm−3 are shown in brown stars (GLIMPSE-D), and… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: 3-dimensional fundamental metallicity relation shown in different angles. The gradient surface is the local FMR adopted from Curti et al. (2020), and the data with errorbars shown are the z ∼ 6 − 8 Auroral Sample. The gradient stars are galaxies in the high-z simulation: SPHINX (Katz et al. 2023) at z ∼ 4.6 − 10. For readers’ convenience, we also provide an interactive 3D plot at https://mzr3d.s3.us-east-2… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The competition between metal synthesis and feedback from massive stars establishes the mass-metallicity relation (MZR) at low-redshifts. Examining this relation at higher redshifts, particularly at the low-mass end $\lesssim10^{8}\,{\rm M_\odot}$, is essential for understanding chemical enrichment and stellar feedback. In this study, we utilize the deep ($\sim30\,$hrs) JWST/NIRSpec G395M GLIMPSE-D survey of the lensed field Abell S1063, to explore the low-mass end of the MZR at high redshift ($z\sim6-8$). We identify eight [OIII]$\lambda$4364 emitters, enabling the most reliable "direct" metallicity measurements in galaxies down to stellar masses of $\sim10^{6-8}\,{\rm M_\odot}$. By combining our sample and galaxies with [OIII]$\lambda$4364 detections from the literature, we calculate direct metallicities for 21 galaxies. We compare our direct metallicities to those derived from strong-line diagnostics, and find them to be consistent with previous calibrations. We fit the MZR at $10^{6.7-9}\,M_{\odot}$ with $\sim0.3-0.5$ dex lower metallicity than local galaxies at similar stellar mass. We find the slope to be $0.25\pm0.10$, comparable to the local MZR; and the MZR exhibits a scatter of $\sim0.2\,$dex, which is larger than the local MZR, The lower metallicities may reflect denser, more gas-rich early environments, with continuous inflow of metal-poor gas diluting the ISM metallicity. In addition, we show that in extremely high electron densities ($n_e \gtrsim 10^5\,{\rm cm^{-3}}$), metallicities can be significantly underestimated ($\sim0.5$ dex), if lower $n_e$ are assumed for galaxies with high $n_e$. In a nutshell, these observations provide the first glimpse of the low-mass MZR at $z\sim6-8$ using direct metallicity measurements. More deep spectroscopic observations in lensed fields will be critical to robustly characterize the MZR and chemical evolution in the early universe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports new JWST/NIRSpec G395M observations of the lensed field Abell S1063 yielding eight [OIII]λ4364 detections at z∼6-8, combined with 13 literature objects for a total of 21 direct metallicity measurements down to stellar masses ∼10^{6-8} M_⊙. The authors compare these direct metallicities to strong-line diagnostics, fit the MZR over 10^{6.7-9} M_⊙, and report an offset of ∼0.3-0.5 dex below the local relation, a slope of 0.25±0.10, and a scatter of ∼0.2 dex. They also note that assuming low n_e when the true density exceeds 10^5 cm^{-3} can underestimate Z by ∼0.5 dex.

Significance. If the direct T_e metallicities prove unbiased after proper per-galaxy n_e corrections and if the lensed sample is representative, the work supplies the first direct-metallicity glimpse of the low-mass MZR at z∼6-8. This would constrain early chemical enrichment and feedback models. The reported consistency between direct and strong-line methods and the explicit warning about high-n_e bias are constructive elements.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and electron-density section] Abstract (final paragraph) and the electron-density discussion: the paper correctly states that n_e ≳ 10^5 cm^{-3} can bias direct metallicities low by ∼0.5 dex if a low-density assumption is used, yet provides no information on whether individual n_e values were measured (e.g., via [SII] λ6717/6731 or [OII] λ3726/3729) and inserted into the emissivity solution for each of the 21 galaxies. Because this systematic is the same magnitude as the claimed 0.3-0.5 dex MZR offset, the slope (0.25±0.10), and the scatter (∼0.2 dex), the central result cannot be evaluated without this clarification.
  2. [MZR fitting and sample description] Stellar-mass and MZR-fit description: gravitational-lensing magnification uncertainties are not quantified or propagated into the stellar-mass estimates or the linear fit. Given that all eight GLIMPSE objects are lensed, this omission affects both the mass range 10^{6.7-9} M_⊙ and the fitted parameters.
  3. [MZR fitting section] MZR fit and error analysis: no explicit error budget or covariance treatment is presented for the metallicity uncertainties, magnification factors, or the derived slope and scatter. The quoted slope uncertainty (±0.10) and scatter (∼0.2 dex) therefore cannot be assessed for robustness.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract sentence 'which is larger than the local MZR' is grammatically incomplete; it should read 'larger than that of the local MZR' or equivalent.
  2. [Throughout] Notation for solar mass is inconsistent (M_⊙ vs M_⊙); standardize throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for their thorough and insightful review of our manuscript. Their comments have helped us identify areas where additional clarity and rigor are needed. We address each major comment in detail below, and we will make the corresponding revisions to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and electron-density section] Abstract (final paragraph) and the electron-density discussion: the paper correctly states that n_e ≳ 10^5 cm^{-3} can bias direct metallicities low by ∼0.5 dex if a low-density assumption is used, yet provides no information on whether individual n_e values were measured (e.g., via [SII] λ6717/6731 or [OII] λ3726/3729) and inserted into the emissivity solution for each of the 21 galaxies. Because this systematic is the same magnitude as the claimed 0.3-0.5 dex MZR offset, the slope (0.25±0.10), and the scatter (∼0.2 dex), the central result cannot be evaluated without this clarification.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that the manuscript does not provide explicit information on the electron density values adopted for each of the 21 galaxies. In our analysis, we used the low-density limit (n_e ≈ 100 cm^{-3}) for the emissivity calculations in the direct method, as is standard when density diagnostics are unavailable. We will revise the relevant sections to include a clear statement of this assumption and add a table or supplementary material listing the adopted n_e for each galaxy (noting which are measured and which assumed). We will also perform and present a sensitivity test showing the effect on metallicities if n_e were 10^4 or 10^5 cm^{-3} for a subset of objects. This addresses the concern about the potential bias affecting the MZR results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [MZR fitting and sample description] Stellar-mass and MZR-fit description: gravitational-lensing magnification uncertainties are not quantified or propagated into the stellar-mass estimates or the linear fit. Given that all eight GLIMPSE objects are lensed, this omission affects both the mass range 10^{6.7-9} M_⊙ and the fitted parameters.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the uncertainties in the gravitational lensing magnification factors were not quantified or propagated into the stellar mass estimates or the MZR fit. The masses for the lensed galaxies were calculated using the nominal magnification values from the lensing models. In the revised manuscript, we will quantify the magnification uncertainties based on the available models for Abell S1063 and propagate them into the mass estimates using Monte Carlo sampling. We will then refit the MZR, reporting the impact on the slope, offset, and scatter. This will ensure the fitted parameters are robust to these uncertainties. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [MZR fitting section] MZR fit and error analysis: no explicit error budget or covariance treatment is presented for the metallicity uncertainties, magnification factors, or the derived slope and scatter. The quoted slope uncertainty (±0.10) and scatter (∼0.2 dex) therefore cannot be assessed for robustness.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes the lack of a detailed error budget. The slope uncertainty of ±0.10 was derived from the linear least-squares fit accounting for the metallicity errors, and the scatter of ∼0.2 dex is the rms of the residuals around the best-fit line. However, we did not include a full treatment of covariances or all systematic uncertainties. We will expand the MZR fitting section to provide an explicit error budget, including contributions from metallicity measurements, stellar mass uncertainties (including magnification), and any calibration systematics. We will also describe the method used to estimate the scatter and present results from a bootstrap resampling or similar technique to confirm the robustness of the slope and scatter values. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: direct measurements yield independent high-z MZR fit

full rationale

The paper measures direct metallicities for 21 galaxies (8 new [OIII]λ4364 detections from JWST GLIMPSE-D plus 13 from literature) and fits the MZR slope (0.25±0.10), offset (0.3-0.5 dex lower than local), and scatter (~0.2 dex) directly to these observed points versus stellar mass. No parameter is fitted to a data subset and then renamed as a prediction for the same or related quantity. The local MZR comparison is external. The n_e bias caveat is presented as a forward-looking systematic warning rather than a self-referential correction. No self-citations are invoked to justify uniqueness, ansatz, or load-bearing premises. The derivation chain consists of independent spectroscopic measurements and a standard fit, remaining self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the validity of the direct T_e method at high redshift and the assumption that the lensed sample is unbiased. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • MZR slope = 0.25
    Fitted value 0.25 derived from the 21-galaxy sample
  • metallicity offset = 0.3-0.5 dex
    0.3-0.5 dex offset relative to local relation, obtained by direct comparison
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The [OIII]λ4364 auroral line provides an unbiased electron-temperature-based metallicity when the gas density is not extremely high
    Invoked when the authors note that n_e ≳ 10^5 cm^{-3} can bias results by ~0.5 dex
  • domain assumption Stellar masses and lensing magnifications for the Abell S1063 sources are accurate enough not to shift the MZR by more than the quoted 0.2 dex scatter
    Required to place the eight new galaxies on the mass axis

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5869 in / 1738 out tokens · 85388 ms · 2026-05-11T00:46:01.213172+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

157 extracted references · 149 canonical work pages · 10 internal anchors

  1. [2]

    , keywords =

    Chemical Composition and Evolution of Irregular and Blue Compact Galaxies. , keywords =

  2. [3]

    , keywords =

    The Composition Gradient across M81. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/165257 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/165257

  3. [4]

    , keywords =

    Oxygen Abundances in Nearby Dwarf Irregular Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/168178 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/168178

  4. [5]

    and Copin, Y

    Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0309134 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x 2003

  5. [30]

    , keywords =

    Extragalactic Chemical Abundances: Do H II Regions and Young Stars Tell the Same Story? The Case of the Spiral Galaxy NGC 300. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/309 , archivePrefix =. 0905.2791 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/1/309

  6. [39]

    , keywords =

    A Glimpse of the New Redshift Frontier through AS1063. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc458 , archivePrefix =. 2411.13640 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc458 2041

  7. [43]

    , keywords =

    The 2017 Release Cloudy. , keywords =

    2017

  8. [44]

    , keywords =

    The Distribution of Low-Mass Stars in the Galactic Disc. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/262.3.545 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/262.3.545

  9. [63]

    and Nicholls, David C

    Understanding Galaxy Evolution Through Emission Lines. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832 , archivePrefix =. 1910.09730 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832 1910

  10. [64]

    , keywords =

    Chemical abundances in high-redshift galaxies: a powerful new emission line diagnostic. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10509-016-2657-8 , archivePrefix =. 1601.01337 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1007/s10509-016-2657-8

  11. [66]

    2023, A&A, 678, A173, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346981

    An extremely metal-poor star complex in the reionization era: Approaching Population III stars with JWST. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346981 , archivePrefix =. 2305.14413 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346981

  12. [67]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.11846, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.11846

    An Ultra-Faint, Chemically Primitive Galaxy Forming at the Epoch of Reionization. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.11846 , archivePrefix =. 2506.11846 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.11846

  13. [68]

    A black hole in a near-pristine galaxy 700 million years after the Big Bang

    A black hole in a near-pristine galaxy 700 million years after the Big Bang. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.22567 , archivePrefix =. 2505.22567 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.22567

  14. [69]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.10521, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.10521

    Pristine Massive Star Formation Caught at the Break of Cosmic Dawn. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.10521 , archivePrefix =. 2507.10521 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.10521

  15. [70]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    A Metal-Free Galaxy at z = 3.19 ? Evidence of Late Population III Star Formation at Cosmic Noon. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.17820 , archivePrefix =. 2507.17820 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.17820

  16. [71]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    A Pristine Star-Forming Complex at z=4.19. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.07073 , archivePrefix =. 2509.07073 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.07073

  17. [72]

    , keywords =

    Testing strong line metallicity diagnostics at z 2. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2508 , archivePrefix =. 1809.03612 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2508

  18. [86]

    A Fleeting GLIMPSE of N/O Enrichment at Cosmic Dawn: Evidence for Wolf Rayet N Stars in a z = 6.1 Galaxy

    A Fleeting GLIMPSE of N/O Enrichment at Cosmic Dawn: Evidence for Wolf Rayet N Stars in a z = 6.1 Galaxy. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.13591 , archivePrefix =. 2511.13591 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.13591

  19. [88]

    P., et al

    GLIMPSE-D: An Exotic Balmer-Jump Object at z=6.20? Revisiting Photometric Selection and the Cosmic Abundance of Pop III Galaxies. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.11790 , archivePrefix =. 2512.11790 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.11790

  20. [91]

    Meddelanden fran Lunds Astronomiska Observatorium Serie I , year = 1922, month = mar, volume =

    On some relations in stellar statistics. Meddelanden fran Lunds Astronomiska Observatorium Serie I , year = 1922, month = mar, volume =

    1922

  21. [94]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Discovery of an Extremely Metal-Poor Galaxy at z=3.654 Using JWST Infrared Spectroscopy. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.17498 , archivePrefix =. 2601.17498 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.17498

  22. [103]

    Boletin de los Observatorios Tonantzintla y Tacubaya , keywords =

    Chemical Abundances in Galactic HII Regions. Boletin de los Observatorios Tonantzintla y Tacubaya , keywords =

  23. [105]

    Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

  24. [117]

    The MUSE Ultra Deep Field (MUDF). V. Characterizing the Mass─Metallicity Relation for Low-mass Galaxies at z 1─2. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad382c , archivePrefix =. 2403.17047 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad382c

  25. [123]

    , keywords =

    JADES: Differing assembly histories of galaxies: Observational evidence for bursty star formation histories and (mini-)quenching in the first billion years of the Universe. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347102 , archivePrefix =. 2306.02470 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347102

  26. [130]

    C., Chisholm, J., Atek, H., et al

    A GLIMPSE into the UV Continuum Slopes of the Faintest Galaxies in the Epoch of Reionization. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.19995 , archivePrefix =. 2601.19995 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.19995

  27. [154]

    L., Coe, D., et al

    Abdurro'uf , Larson , R. L., Coe , D., et al. 2024, , 973, 47, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6001

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6001 2024

  28. [155]

    2021, , 503, 5826, 10.1093/mnras/stab322

    Agertz , O., Renaud , F., Feltzing , S., et al. 2021, , 503, 5826, 10.1093/mnras/stab322

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab322 2021

  29. [156]

    M., & Keenan , F

    Aggarwal , K. M., & Keenan , F. P. 1999, , 123, 311, 10.1086/313232

    work page doi:10.1086/313232 1999

  30. [157]

    Aller , L. H. 1984, Physics of thermal gaseous nebulae , 10.1007/978-94-010-9639-3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-010-9639-3 1984

  31. [158]

    2025, , 695, A250, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451731

    \'A lvarez-M \'a rquez , J., Crespo G \'o mez , A., Colina , L., et al. 2025, , 695, A250, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451731

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451731 2025

  32. [159]

    Z., Cullen , F., Carnall , A

    Arellano-C \'o rdova , K. Z., Cullen , F., Carnall , A. C., et al. 2025, , 540, 2991, 10.1093/mnras/staf855

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf855 2025

  33. [160]

    Z., M \'e ndez-Delgado , J

    Arellano-C \'o rdova , K. Z., M \'e ndez-Delgado , J. E., Flury , S. R., et al. 2026, , 547, stag380, 10.1093/mnras/stag380

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stag380 2026

  34. [161]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.20045

    Asada , Y., Fujimoto , S., Chisholm , J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.20045, 10.48550/arXiv.2601.20045

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.20045 2026

  35. [162]

    M., & Grevesse, N

    Asplund , M., Amarsi , A. M., & Grevesse , N. 2021, , 653, A141, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140445

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 2021

  36. [163]

    JWST’s GLIMPSE: an overview of the deep- est probe of early galaxy formation and cosmic reionization

    Atek , H., Chisholm , J., Kokorev , V., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.07542, 10.48550/arXiv.2511.07542

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.07542 2025

  37. [164]

    A., Chisholm , J., Erb , D

    Berg , D. A., Chisholm , J., Erb , D. K., et al. 2021, , 922, 170, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac141b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac141b 2021

  38. [165]

    A., Skillman , E

    Berg , D. A., Skillman , E. D., Marble , A. R., et al. 2012, , 754, 98, 10.1088/0004-637X/754/2/98

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/754/2/98 2012

  39. [166]

    2020, astropy/photutils: 1.0.0 , 1.0.0, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.4044744

    Bradley , L., Sip o cz , B., Robitaille , T., et al. 2020, astropy/photutils: 1.0.0 , 1.0.0, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.4044744

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.4044744 2020

  40. [167]

    2023, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools , 0.6.17, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.7299500

    Brammer , G. 2023, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools , 0.6.17, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.7299500

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.7299500 2023

  41. [168]

    Brinchmann , J., Charlot , S., White , S. D. M., et al. 2004, , 351, 1151, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07881.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07881.x 2004

  42. [169]

    , keywords =

    Bunker , A. J., Saxena , A., Cameron , A. J., et al. 2023, , 677, A88, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346159

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346159 2023

  43. [170]

    and Kinney, Anne L

    Calzetti , D., Armus , L., Bohlin , R. C., et al. 2000, , 533, 682, 10.1086/308692

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/308692 2000

  44. [171]

    1986, , 223, 811, 10.1093/mnras/223.4.811

    Campbell , A., Terlevich , R., & Melnick , J. 1986, , 223, 811, 10.1093/mnras/223.4.811

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/223.4.811 1986

  45. [172]

    Inferring the star-formation histories of massive quiescent galaxies with BAGPIPES: Evidence for multiple quenching mechanisms

    Carnall , A. C., McLure , R. J., Dunlop , J. S., & Dav \'e , R. 2018, , 480, 4379, 10.1093/mnras/sty2169

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2169 2018

  46. [173]

    2024, ApJ, 972, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f88

    Castellano , M., Napolitano , L., Fontana , A., et al. 2024, , 972, 143, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f88

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f88 2024

  47. [174]

    Galactic

    Chabrier , G. 2003, , 115, 763, 10.1086/376392

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/376392 2003

  48. [175]

    2025, , 985, 24, 10.3847/1538-4357/adc7b5

    Chakraborty , P., Sarkar , A., Smith , R., et al. 2025, , 985, 24, 10.3847/1538-4357/adc7b5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc7b5 2025

  49. [176]

    2024, , 976, L15, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad8dc9

    Chemerynska , I., Atek , H., Dayal , P., et al. 2024, , 976, L15, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad8dc9

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad8dc9 2024

  50. [177]

    2018, , 481, 1690, 10.1093/mnras/sty2380

    Chisholm , J., Tremonti , C., & Leitherer , C. 2018, , 481, 1690, 10.1093/mnras/sty2380

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2380 2018

  51. [178]

    J., et al

    Choustikov , N., Katz , H., Cameron , A. J., et al. 2026, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 9, 58199, 10.33232/001c.158199

    work page doi:10.33232/001c.158199 2026

  52. [179]

    2002, , 40, 27, 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093845

    Churchwell , E. 2002, , 40, 27, 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093845

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093845 2002

  53. [180]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.08933, 10.48550/arXiv.2504.08933

    Curti , M. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.08933, 10.48550/arXiv.2504.08933

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.08933 2025

  54. [181]

    2017, , 465, 1384, 10.1093/mnras/stw2766

    Curti , M., Cresci , G., Mannucci , F., et al. 2017, , 465, 1384, 10.1093/mnras/stw2766

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2766 2017

  55. [182]

    2020, MNRAS, 491, 944, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2910

    Curti , M., Mannucci , F., Cresci , G., & Maiolino , R. 2020, , 491, 944, 10.1093/mnras/stz2910

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2910 2020

  56. [183]

    2023, MNRAS, 518, 425, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2737 Dav´ e, R., Finlator, K., & Oppenheimer, B

    Curti , M., D'Eugenio , F., Carniani , S., et al. 2023, , 518, 425, 10.1093/mnras/stac2737

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2737 2023

  57. [184]

    2024, , 684, A75, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346698

    Curti , M., Maiolino , R., Curtis-Lake , E., et al. 2024, , 684, A75, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346698

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346698 2024

  58. [185]

    Dav \'e , R., Finlator , K., & Oppenheimer , B. D. 2012, , 421, 98, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20148.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20148.x 2012

  59. [186]

    Where is the matter in the Merging Cluster Abell 2218?

    El \' asd \'o ttir , \'A ., Limousin , M., Richard , J., et al. 2007, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:0710.5636, 10.48550/arXiv.0710.5636

    work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.0710.5636 2007

  60. [187]

    L., Patton , D

    Ellison , S. L., Patton , D. R., Simard , L., & McConnachie , A. W. 2008, , 135, 1877, 10.1088/0004-6256/135/5/1877

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/135/5/1877 2008

  61. [188]

    P., Topping , M

    Endsley , R., Chisholm , J., Stark , D. P., Topping , M. W., & Whitler , L. 2025, , 987, 189, 10.3847/1538-4357/addc74

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/addc74 2025

  62. [189]

    , keywords =

    Endsley , R., Stark , D. P., Whitler , L., et al. 2023, , 524, 2312, 10.1093/mnras/stad1919

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1919 2023

  63. [190]

    K., Shapley, A

    Erb , D. K., Shapley , A. E., Pettini , M., et al. 2006, , 644, 813, 10.1086/503623

    work page doi:10.1086/503623 2006

  64. [191]

    P., et al

    Fei , Q., Fujimoto , S., Naidu , R. P., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.20452, 10.48550/arXiv.2509.20452

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.20452 2025

  65. [192]

    J., et al., 2017, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv170510877F ( @eprint arXiv 1705.10877 )

    Ferland , G. J., Chatzikos , M., Guzm \'a n , F., et al. 2017, , 53, 385. 1705.10877

    work page arXiv 2017

  66. [193]

    P., Chisholm, J., et al

    Fujimoto , S., Naidu , R. P., Chisholm , J., et al. 2025, , 989, 46, 10.3847/1538-4357/ade9a1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade9a1 2025

  67. [194]

    Other red dots: A possible GLIMPSE of normal AGB stars at Cosmic Noon through extreme lensing

    Furtak , L. J., Zitrin , A., Zackrisson , E., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.18696, 10.48550/arXiv.2604.18696

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.18696 2026

  68. [195]

    M., Torrey , P., Ellison , S

    Garcia , A. M., Torrey , P., Ellison , S. L., et al. 2025, , 536, 119, 10.1093/mnras/stae2587

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2587 2025

  69. [196]

    , keywords =

    Gardner , J. P., Mather , J. C., Clampin , M., et al. 2006, , 123, 485, 10.1007/s11214-006-8315-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-006-8315-7 2006

  70. [197]

    and others , year=

    Gardner , J. P., Mather , J. C., Abbott , R., et al. 2023, , 135, 068001, 10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5 2023

  71. [198]

    C., Lu , Y., et al

    Guo , Y., Koo , D. C., Lu , Y., et al. 2016, , 822, 103, 10.3847/0004-637X/822/2/103

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/822/2/103 2016

  72. [199]

    L., Ellis , R., et al

    Harikane , Y., Sanders , R. L., Ellis , R., et al. 2025, , 993, 204, 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0e53

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0e53 2025

  73. [200]

    J., Saldana-Lopez , A., Citro , A., et al

    Hayes , M. J., Saldana-Lopez , A., Citro , A., et al. 2025, , 982, 14, 10.3847/1538-4357/adaea1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adaea1 2025

  74. [201]

    2024, , 960, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad12cd

    He , X., Wang , X., Jones , T., et al. 2024, , 960, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad12cd

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad12cd 2024

  75. [202]

    E., Brammer , G

    Heintz , K. E., Brammer , G. B., Gim \'e nez-Arteaga , C., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1517, 10.1038/s41550-023-02078-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02078-7 2023

  76. [203]

    Y.-Y., Coe , D., Abdurro'uf , et al

    Hsiao , T. Y.-Y., Coe , D., Abdurro'uf , et al. 2023, , 949, L34, 10.3847/2041-8213/acc94b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acc94b 2023

  77. [204]

    Y.-Y., Abdurro'uf , Coe , D., et al

    Hsiao , T. Y.-Y., Abdurro'uf , Coe , D., et al. 2024 a , , 973, 8, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5da8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5da8 2024

  78. [205]

    Y.-Y., \'A lvarez-M \'a rquez , J., Coe , D., et al

    Hsiao , T. Y.-Y., \'A lvarez-M \'a rquez , J., Coe , D., et al. 2024 b , , 973, 81, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6562

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6562 2024

  79. [206]

    Y.-Y., Sun , F., Lin , X., et al

    Hsiao , T. Y.-Y., Sun , F., Lin , X., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.03873, 10.48550/arXiv.2505.03873

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.03873 2025

  80. [207]

    2023, ApJ, 956, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf376

    Isobe , Y., Ouchi , M., Nakajima , K., et al. 2023, , 956, 139, 10.3847/1538-4357/acf376

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf376 2023

Showing first 80 references.