pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.08735 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Annealing-induced grain coarsening and voltage kinks in superconducting NbRe films

Zahra Makhdoumi Kakhaki , Anton O. Pokusinskyi , Francesco Avitabile , Abhishek Kumar , Francesco Colangelo , Carla Cirillo , Carmine Attanasio , Oleksandr V. Dobrovolskiy This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords NbResuperconducting thin filmsannealinggrain coarseningvoltage kinksnormal domainsvortex dynamicsGinzburg-Landau simulations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Annealing enlarges grains in NbRe films and shifts breakdown from flux-flow instability to voltage kinks from normal domain growth.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compares as-grown and annealed 20-nm NbRe films to track how grain size controls vortex dynamics and the loss of superconductivity under current. Annealing coarsens average crystallite size from roughly 2 nm to 8 nm, replacing the single flux-flow instability seen in small-grain films with multiple distinct kinks in the current-voltage curves. The authors interpret the kinks as the onset of normal domains that nucleate and expand, an interpretation supported by time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau simulations that show vortices channeling along the new grain boundaries. If this picture holds, the annealed material forms a superconducting network whose local heating at the kinks can be used for controlled resistance steps.

Core claim

In annealed NbRe films the low-resistive state no longer collapses via flux-flow instability; instead the I-V traces develop multiple voltage kinks that the authors attribute to nucleation and growth of normal domains. Time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau simulations reproduce the kinks when the grain-boundary geometry of the coarsened films is included, revealing vortex paths that follow the boundaries and create a network of superconducting regions separated by normal channels.

What carries the argument

Nucleation and growth of normal domains inside a grain-coarsened superconducting network, with vortex channeling along grain boundaries as revealed by time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau simulations.

If this is right

  • Annealed films form superconducting networks in which grain boundaries act as preferred vortex channels.
  • Voltage kinks produce discrete resistance steps that can be harnessed for switching.
  • Localized heating tied to the kinks offers a route to sensing applications.
  • Vortex dynamics and the breakdown of the zero-resistance state change qualitatively once grains exceed a few nanometers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same grain-coarsening route could be used to tune the single-photon detection response of NbRe films by introducing controlled switching thresholds.
  • Other polycrystalline non-centrosymmetric superconductors may exhibit analogous kink behavior once their grain size is deliberately increased.
  • The observed network structure suggests that microstructural engineering can turn an apparent instability into a functional feature for superconducting electronics.

Load-bearing premise

The kinks arise specifically from normal-domain nucleation and growth rather than from changes in vortex pinning, Joule heating artifacts, or other mechanisms, and the simulations correctly capture the actual grain-boundary geometry and dynamics of the films.

What would settle it

Local scanning of temperature or magnetic field at the exact voltages of the kinks to detect the appearance of normal domains, or the absence of kinks in films whose grain size is increased by a different method that avoids the same boundary network.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08735 by Abhishek Kumar, Anton O. Pokusinskyi, Carla Cirillo, Carmine Attanasio, Francesco Avitabile, Francesco Colangelo, Oleksandr V. Dobrovolskiy, Zahra Makhdoumi Kakhaki.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. AFM images of the surfaces of the as-grown (a) and an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Temperature dependence of the normalized resistance for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) shows the kink voltage normalized by the kink or￾der, V ∗/(nBL), at 2.5 K, where n is the kink index, indicating that V ∗ does not scale linearly with n. This behavior is also apparent in the I-V curves of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Experimental dependences [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. TDGL modeling results for the as-grown (a-c) and annealed films (d-f). (a, d) Geometries of the SC strips, indicating the directions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

NbRe, a non-centrosymmetric superconductor with a transition temperature $T_\mathrm{c}$ up to 9\,K, attracts interest for its strong antisymmetric spin-orbit coupling and suitability for single-photon detection. While bulk and thin-film polycrystalline NbRe are well studied, how superconductivity and vortex dynamics evolve with increasing grain size in thin films is largely unknown. Here, we investigate as-grown and annealed 20\,nm-thick NbRe films, where annealing increases the average crystallite size from approximately $2$\,nm to $8$\,nm, and study vortex dynamics via current-voltage ($I$-$V$) measurements over a broad temperature and magnetic field range. In contrast to as-grown films, where the low-resistive state breaks down due to flux-flow instability, annealed films exhibit multiple voltage kinks in the $I$-$V$ curves. We attribute these kinks to the nucleation and growth of normal domains, as further suggested by time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau simulations. Overall, the annealed films form superconducting networks with vortex-channeling paths along the grain boundaries, while localized heating and voltage kinks could be harnessed for discrete-resistance switching and sensing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines 20 nm thick NbRe thin films before and after annealing, reporting that annealing coarsens average grain size from ~2 nm to ~8 nm. As-grown films exhibit breakdown of the low-resistive state via flux-flow instability, whereas annealed films display multiple voltage kinks in I-V curves over broad temperature and magnetic-field ranges. These kinks are attributed to nucleation and growth of normal domains, with supporting evidence from time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) simulations. The annealed films are interpreted as forming superconducting networks featuring vortex-channeling paths along grain boundaries, with suggested applications in discrete-resistance switching and sensing.

Significance. If the mechanistic attribution holds, the work shows that controlled grain coarsening can switch the dominant vortex-dissipation mechanism in non-centrosymmetric superconducting films from flux-flow instability to normal-domain dynamics. The combination of wide-range I-V measurements with TDGL modeling offers a concrete route to microstructure-engineered vortex behavior, relevant to single-photon detectors and resistive sensors. The direct electrical data on fabricated films constitute a non-circular experimental foundation.

major comments (2)
  1. [TDGL Simulations section] TDGL Simulations section: the simulations are presented as evidence that the observed voltage kinks arise from normal-domain nucleation and growth, yet the manuscript provides only qualitative visual similarity. No quantitative match is shown between simulated and measured kink voltages, their number, or their dependence on temperature and field; nor is it demonstrated that the modeled grain-boundary network statistically reproduces the measured 2 nm to 8 nm coarsening. This leaves the central attribution vulnerable to alternative explanations such as pinning variations or heating.
  2. [Results section on I-V curves] I-V curves and grain-size analysis (Results): the claim that annealed films exhibit multiple kinks distinct from flux-flow instability rests on the assumption that grain-boundary geometry controls the dynamics, but the text does not report how grain-size distributions were quantified (e.g., from XRD or TEM), the number of devices measured, or error bars on kink positions. Without these, reproducibility and exclusion of sample-to-sample or heating artifacts cannot be assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: grain sizes are given as 'approximately 2 nm to 8 nm' without uncertainties or measurement method; adding these would strengthen the quantitative framing of the coarsening effect.
  2. [TDGL Simulations section] The manuscript would benefit from a brief control simulation (uniform film or altered pinning strength) to illustrate that the kink features are specifically tied to the grain-boundary network rather than generic TDGL dynamics.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which highlight important areas for clarification and strengthening of the manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [TDGL Simulations section] TDGL Simulations section: the simulations are presented as evidence that the observed voltage kinks arise from normal-domain nucleation and growth, yet the manuscript provides only qualitative visual similarity. No quantitative match is shown between simulated and measured kink voltages, their number, or their dependence on temperature and field; nor is it demonstrated that the modeled grain-boundary network statistically reproduces the measured 2 nm to 8 nm coarsening. This leaves the central attribution vulnerable to alternative explanations such as pinning variations or heating.

    Authors: We agree that the TDGL simulations offer qualitative rather than quantitative agreement with experiment. Their purpose is to illustrate that normal-domain nucleation and sequential growth within a grain-boundary network can generate multiple voltage kinks, providing a mechanistic basis consistent with the annealed-film data and distinct from the flux-flow instability seen in as-grown films. In revision we will expand the Simulations section with: (i) explicit details on how the grain-boundary network is constructed from the experimentally measured grain-size increase, (ii) additional runs demonstrating the dependence of kink number and positions on temperature and applied field, and (iii) a brief discussion of possible alternative mechanisms (pinning inhomogeneity or local heating) and why the present data favor the normal-domain scenario. A device-specific quantitative fit to every kink voltage is not feasible without spatially resolved microstructural maps of each measured junction, which lie outside the scope of the present study; we will state this limitation explicitly. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results section on I-V curves] I-V curves and grain-size analysis (Results): the claim that annealed films exhibit multiple kinks distinct from flux-flow instability rests on the assumption that grain-boundary geometry controls the dynamics, but the text does not report how grain-size distributions were quantified (e.g., from XRD or TEM), the number of devices measured, or error bars on kink positions. Without these, reproducibility and exclusion of sample-to-sample or heating artifacts cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We accept that these methodological details must be supplied. Grain sizes were obtained from X-ray diffraction using the Scherrer formula on the (110) reflection; the revised manuscript will include the full analysis procedure, peak-fitting parameters, and the resulting grain-size histograms. Electrical measurements were performed on multiple devices (at least four per film type and temperature/field condition) fabricated on separate chips. We will report this number, together with error bars on kink voltages derived from the standard deviation across devices and repeated sweeps. To address heating concerns we used pulsed current ramps with low duty cycle; the absence of hysteresis or time-dependent drift will be documented in the Methods section. These additions will allow readers to evaluate reproducibility and rule out artifacts. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct I-V measurements and qualitative TDGL interpretation remain independent of fitted inputs or self-citation chains.

full rationale

The paper's core observations (voltage kinks in annealed films vs. flux-flow instability in as-grown films) derive from direct electrical transport measurements on fabricated samples. The attribution to normal-domain nucleation is presented as an interpretation supported by TDGL simulations, but the text does not reduce the reported kink positions, number, or field/temperature dependence to quantities fitted from the same dataset or to a self-referential definition. No self-citation load-bearing steps, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results appear in the provided abstract or description. The simulations function as qualitative illustration rather than a predictive derivation that collapses to the input data by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work is experimental with supporting numerical simulations; no free parameters are fitted to produce the central claim, and no new physical entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau equations provide a valid mesoscopic description of vortex and domain dynamics in thin-film superconductors
    Invoked to interpret the origin of the observed voltage kinks.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5556 in / 1381 out tokens · 53101 ms · 2026-05-10T16:43:53.835451+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Cirillo, J

    C. Cirillo, J. Chang, M. Caputo, J. W. N. Los, S. Dorenbos, I. E. Zadeh, and C. Attanasio, Superconducting nanowire single photon detectors based on disordered NbRe films, Appl. Phys. Lett.117, 172602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Ejrnaes, C

    M. Ejrnaes, C. Cirillo, D. Salvoni, F. Chianese, C. Bruscino, P. Ercolano, A. Cassinese, C. Attanasio, G. P. Pepe, and L. Par- lato, Single photon detection in NbRe superconducting mi- crostrips, Appl. Phys. Lett.121, 265303 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Cirillo, M

    C. Cirillo, M. Ejrnaes, P. Ercolano, C. Bruscino, A. Cassinese, D. Salvoni, C. Attanasio, G. P. Pepe, and L. Parlato, Single pho- ton detection up to 2µm in pair of parallel microstrips based on NbRe ultrathin films, Sci. Rep.14, 20345 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    J. Koch, C. Cirillo, S. Battisti, L. Ruf, Z. Makhdoumi Kakhaki, A. Paghi, A. Gulian, S. Teknowijoyo, G. D. Si- moni, F. Giazotto, C. Attanasio, E. Scheer, and A. D. Bernardo, Gate-controlled supercurrent effect in dry-etched Dayem bridges of non-centrosymmetric niobium rhenium, Nano Res.17, 6575 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Battisti, J

    S. Battisti, J. Koch, A. Paghi, L. Ruf, A. Gulian, S. Teknow- ijoyo, C. Cirillo, Z. Makhdoumi Kakhaki, C. Attanasio, E. Scheer, A. D. Bernardo, G. D. Simoni, and F. Gi- azotto, Demonstration of high-impedance superconducting NbRe dayem bridges, Appl. Phys. Lett.124, 172601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    A. B. Karki, Y . M. Xiong, N. Haldolaarachchige, S. Stadler, I. Vekhter, P. W. Adams, D. P. Young, W. A. Phelan, and J. Y . Chan, Physical properties of the noncentrosymmetric supercon- ductor Nb0.18Re0.82, Phys. Rev. B83, 144525 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    J. Chen, L. Jiao, J. L. Zhang, Y . Chen, L. Yang, M. Nicklas, F. Steglich, and H. Q. Yuan, BCS-like superconductivity in the noncentrosymmetric compounds NbxRe1−x (0.13≤x≤0.38), Phys. Rev. B88, 144510 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Cirillo, R

    C. Cirillo, R. Fittipaldi, M. Smidman, G. Carapella, C. Attana- sio, A. Vecchione, R. P. Singh, M. R. Lees, G. Balakrishnan, and M. Cuoco, Evidence of double-gap superconductivity in noncentrosymmetric Nb0.18Re0.82 single crystals, Phys. Rev. B 91, 134508 (2015)

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Cirillo, G

    C. Cirillo, G. Carapella, M. Salvato, R. Arpaia, M. Caputo, and C. Attanasio, Superconducting properties of noncentrosymmet- ric Nb 0.18Re0.82 thin films probed by transport and tunneling experiments, Phys. Rev. B94, 104512 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Colangelo, M

    F. Colangelo, M. Modestino, F. Avitabile, A. Galluzzi, Z. Makhdoumi Kakhaki, A. Kumar, J. Linder, M. Polichetti, C. At- tanasio, and C. Cirillo, Unveiling intrinsic triplet superconduc- tivity in noncentrosymmetric NbRe through inverse spin-valve effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 226002 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Cirillo, M

    C. Cirillo, M. Caputo, G. Divitini, J. W. A. Robinson, and C. At- tanasio, Polycrystalline NbRe superconducting films deposited by direct current magnetron sputtering, Thin Solid Films758, 139450 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Tinkham,Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed

    M. Tinkham,Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed. (Dover Publications, Mineola, New York, 2004)

    work page 2004

  13. [13]

    Makhdoumi Kakhaki, A

    Z. Makhdoumi Kakhaki, A. Martinelli, F. Avitabile, A. D. 10 Bernardo, C. Attanasio, and C. Cirillo, Effect of thermal anneal- ing on the average and local structure of superconducting poly- crystalline NbRe films, Supercond. Sci. Technol.37, 125002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Caputo, C

    M. Caputo, C. Cirillo, and C. Attanasio, NbRe as candidate ma- terial for fast single photon detection, Appl. Phys. Lett.111, 192601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    De Chiara, Z

    F. De Chiara, Z. Makhdoumi Kakhaki, F. Avitabile, F. Colan- gelo, A. Kumar, C. Attanasio, and C. Cirillo, Fast vortex dy- namics and relaxation times in NbRe-based heterostructures, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol.17, 292 (2026)

    work page 2026

  16. [16]

    Makhdoumi Kakhaki, A

    Z. Makhdoumi Kakhaki, A. Leo, A. Spuri, M. Ejrnaes, L. Par- lato, G. P. Pepe, F. Avitabile, A. D. Bernardo, A. Nigro, C. At- tanasio, and C. Cirillo, Characterization of quasiparticle relax- ation times in microstrips of NbReN for prospective applica- tions in superconducting single-photon detectors, Mater. Sci. Eng. B304, 117376 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Embon, Y

    L. Embon, Y . Anahory, Z. L. Jelic, E. O. Lachman, Y . Myasoe- dov, M. E. Huber, G. P. Mikitik, A. V . Silhanek, M. V . Milo- sevic, A. Gurevich, and E. Zeldov, Imaging of super-fast dy- namics and flow instabilities of superconducting vortices, Nat. Commun.8, 85 (2017)

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    O. V . Dobrovolskiy, D. Y . V odolazov, F. Porrati, R. Sachser, V . M. Bevz, M. Y . Mikhailov, A. V . Chumak, and M. Huth, Ultra-fast vortex motion in a direct-write Nb-C superconductor, Nat. Commun.11, 3291 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Budinsk ´a, B

    B. Budinsk ´a, B. Aichner, D. Y . V odolazov, M. Y . Mikhailov, F. Porrati, M. Huth, A. V . Chumak, W. Lang, and O. V . Do- brovolskiy, Rising speed limits for fluxons via edge-quality improvement in wide MoSi thin films, Phys. Rev. Appl.17, 034072 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    A. I. Larkin and Y . N. Ovchinnikov, Nonlinear conductivity of superconductors in the mixed state, Sov. Phys. JETP41, 960 (1975)

    work page 1975

  21. [21]

    A. V . Silhanek, A. Leo, G. Grimaldi, G. R. Berdiyorov, M. V . Milosevic, A. Nigro, S. Pace, N. Verellen, W. Gillijns, V . Metlushko, B. Ili´c, X. Zhu, and V . V . Moshchalkov, Influ- ence of artificial pinning on vortex lattice instability in super- conducting films, New J. Phys.14, 053006 (2012)

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    A. I. Bezuglyj, V . A. Shklovskij, R. V . V ovk, V . M. Bevz, M. Huth, and O. V . Dobrovolskiy, Local flux-flow instability in superconducting films nearTc, Phys. Rev. B99, 174518 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    D. Y . V odolazov, Flux-flow instability in a strongly disordered superconducting strip with an edge barrier for vortex entry, Su- percond. Sci. Technol.32, 115013 (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    A. V . Silhanek, M. V . Miloˇsevi´c, R. B. G. Kramer, G. R. Berdiy- orov, J. Van de V ondel, R. F. Luccas, T. Puig, F. M. Peeters, and V . V . Moshchalkov, Formation of stripelike flux patterns ob- tained by freezing kinematic vortices in a superconducting Pb film, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 017001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    A. G. Sivakov, A. M. Glukhov, A. N. Omelyanchouk, Y . Ko- val, P. M¨uller, and A. V . Ustinov, Josephson behavior of phase- slip lines in wide superconducting strips, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 267001 (2003)

    work page 2003

  26. [26]

    O. V . Dobrovolskiy, Fast dynamics of vortices in superconduc- tors, inEncyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics, edited by V . M. Fomin (Elsevier, 2024) Chap. 9, p. 735, 2nd ed

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    A. I. Bezuglyj and V . A. Shklovskij, Effect of self-heating on flux flow instability in a superconductor nearTc, Physica C202, 234 (1992)

    work page 1992

  28. [28]

    A. V . Gurevich and R. G. Mints, Sov. Phys. Usp.27, 19 (1984)

    work page 1984

  29. [29]

    A. I. Bezuglyj and V . A. Shklovskij, Thermal domains in inho- mogeneous current-carrying superconductors. current-voltage characteristics and dynamics of domain formation after current jumps, J. Low Temp. Phys.57, 227 (1984)

    work page 1984

  30. [30]

    B. L. T. Plourde, D. J. V . Harlingen, D. Y . V odolazov, R. Bessel- ing, M. B. S. Hesselberth, and P. H. Kes, Influence of edge bar- riers on vortex dynamics in thin weak-pinning superconducting strips, Phys. Rev. B64, 014503 (2001)

    work page 2001

  31. [31]

    G. M. Maksimova, Mixed state and critical current in narrow semiconducting films, Phys. Solid State40, 1607 (1998)

    work page 1998

  32. [32]

    H. S. Ruiz, J. H¨anisch, M. Polichetti, A. Galluzzi, L. Gozzelino, D. Torsello, S. Miloˇsevi´c-Govedarovi´c, J. Grbovi ´c-Novakovi´c, O. V . Dobrovolskiy, W. Lang,et al., Critical current density in advanced superconductors, Prog. Mater. Sci.155, 101492 (2026)

    work page 2026

  33. [33]

    Bad ´ıa-Maj´os and C

    A. Bad ´ıa-Maj´os and C. L ´opez, Electromagnetics close beyond the critical state: thermodynamic prospect, Supercond. Sci. Technol.25, 104004 (2012)

    work page 2012

  34. [34]

    N. Riva, F. Sirois, C. Lacroix, F. Pellerin, J. Giguere, F. Grilli, and B. Dutoit, A wide rangee–jconstitutive law for simulating rebco tapes above their critical current, Supercond. Sci. Tech- nol.34, 115014 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    P. W. Anderson and Y . B. Kim, Hard superconductivity: theory of the motion of Abrikosov flux lines, Rev. Mod. Phys.36, 39 (1964)

    work page 1964

  36. [36]

    Blatter, M

    G. Blatter, M. V . Feigel’man, V . B. Geshkenbein, A. I. Larkin, and V . M. Vinokur, V ortices in high-temperature superconduc- tors, Rev. Mod. Phys.66, 1125 (1994)

    work page 1994

  37. [37]

    Larbalestier, A

    D. Larbalestier, A. Gurevich, D. M. Feldmann, and A. Polyan- skii, High-Tc superconducting materials for electric power ap- plications, Nature414, 368 (2001)

    work page 2001

  38. [38]

    M. Y . Kupriyanov and V . F. Lukichev, Influence of boundary transparency on the critical current of dirty s–s ′–s structures, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.94, 139 (1988)

    work page 1988

  39. [39]

    M. Y . Kupriyanov and V . F. Lukichev, Temperature dependence of pair-breaking current in superconductors, Sov. J. Low Temp. Phys.6, 210 (1980)

    work page 1980

  40. [40]

    Romijn, T

    J. Romijn, T. M. Klapwijk, M. J. Renne, and J. E. Mooij, Crit- ical pair-breaking current in superconducting aluminum strips far belowT c, Phys. Rev. B26, 3648 (1982)

    work page 1982

  41. [41]

    V . M. Bevz, M. Y . Mikhailov, B. Budinsk´a, S. Lamb-Camarena, S. O. Shpilinska, A. V . Chumak, M. Urb ´anek, M. Arndt, W. Lang, and O. V . Dobrovolskiy, V ortex counting and ve- locimetry for slitted superconducting thin strips, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 034098 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Grimaldi, A

    G. Grimaldi, A. Leo, P. Sabatino, G. Carapella, A. Nigro, S. Pace, V . V . Moshchalkov, and A. V . Silhanek, Speed limit to the Abrikosov lattice in mesoscopic superconductors, Phys. Rev. B92, 024513 (2015)

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    Adami, Z

    O.-A. Adami, Z. L. Jelic, C. Xue, M. Abdel-Hafiez, B. Hack- ens, V . V . Moshchalkov, M. V . Milosevic, J. Van de V ondel, and A. V . Silhanek, Onset, evolution, and magnetic braking of vor- tex lattice instabilities in nanostructured superconducting films, Phys. Rev. B92, 134506 (2015)

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    I. V . Zolochevskii, Stimulation of superconductivity by mi- crowave radiation in wide tin films, Low Temp. Phys.39, 571 (2013)

    work page 2013

  45. [45]

    Kramer and R

    L. Kramer and R. J. Watts-Tobin, Theory of dissipative current- carrying states in superconducting filaments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 1041 (1978)

    work page 1978

  46. [46]

    Bishop-Van Horn, pyTDGL: Time-dependent Ginzburg- Landau in Python, Comput

    L. Bishop-Van Horn, pyTDGL: Time-dependent Ginzburg- Landau in Python, Comput. Phys. Commun.291, 108799 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    A. D. Semenov, G. N. Gol’tsman, and A. A. Korneev, Quantum detection by current carrying superconducting film, Physica C 351, 349 (2001)

    work page 2001

  48. [48]

    J. Buh, V . Kabanov, V . Baranov, A. Mrzel, A. Kovic, and D. Mi- 11 hailovic, Control of switching between metastable supercon- ducting states in d-MoN nanowires, Nat. Commun.6, 10250 (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    O. V . Dolgov and A. A. Golubov, Strong electron-phonon inter- action in multiband superconductors, Phys. Rev. B77, 214526 (2008)

    work page 2008

  50. [50]

    K. V . Grigorishin, Effective Ginzburg-Landau free energy func- tional for multi-band isotropic superconductors, Phys. Lett. A 380, 1781 (2016)

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    A. E. Koshelev, I. A. Sadovskyy, C. L. Phillips, and A. Glatz, Optimization of vortex pinning by nanoparticles using simu- lations of the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau model, Phys. Rev. B93, 060508 (2016)

    work page 2016