Many-body dynamical localization in Fock space
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:35 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Quantum many-body dynamics suppresses transport in Fock space of a periodically driven two-mode bosonic system, unlike the ergodic diffusion of its classical mean-field limit.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
While the classical mean-field dynamics exhibits bounded ergodic diffusion along the population imbalance axis, the quantum dynamics reveals strong suppression of transport in Fock space, in close analogy with Anderson localization in disordered lattices. The localization length is characterized along with its scaling, the spectral statistics cross over to Poisson upon localization, and the effect is linked to discrete time crystals.
What carries the argument
The mapping of the driven two-mode bosonic system to the kicked-top model, which permits direct comparison of classical diffusion against quantum interference effects in Fock space.
If this is right
- The localization length and its dependence on particle number and driving parameters become quantifiable.
- Level statistics cross over from random-matrix to Poisson form once localization sets in.
- Many-body dynamical localization connects directly to discrete time crystal behavior.
- The driven bosonic system supplies a platform to investigate the Anderson transition inside Fock space.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Experiments with ultracold atoms could test Fock-space localization by tracking population imbalance and level statistics under periodic driving.
- The same mapping technique might reveal analogous localization in other periodically driven many-body systems.
- Suppressed transport could limit entanglement growth or information propagation within the Fock space.
Load-bearing premise
The kicked-top model mapping accurately captures the many-body dynamics of the interacting two-mode bosonic system under periodic driving.
What would settle it
Direct measurement or simulation showing persistent ergodic spreading or Wigner-Dyson level statistics in the quantum regime, rather than bounded localization length and Poisson statistics, would falsify the suppression of transport.
Figures
read the original abstract
We investigate the emergence of many-body dynamical localization (MBDL) in the Fock space of an interacting two-mode bosonic system subject to periodic driving. Using a mapping to the paradigmatic kicked-top model, we analyze the interplay between classical chaotic diffusion and quantum interference effects. While the mean-field (classical) dynamics exhibits bounded ergodic diffusion along the population imbalance axis, the quantum dynamics reveals strong suppression of transport in Fock space, in close analogy with Anderson localization in disordered lattices. We characterize the localization length, its scaling with particle number and driving parameters, and reveal the spectral crossover from random-matrix to Poisson statistics as the many-body ensemble localizes. We highlight the connection between MBDL and discrete time crystals. Our findings offer a promising avenue to study the Anderson transition in Fock space.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper investigates the emergence of many-body dynamical localization (MBDL) in the Fock space of an interacting two-mode bosonic system under periodic driving. By mapping the system to the kicked-top model, it contrasts bounded ergodic diffusion in the classical mean-field dynamics along the population imbalance axis with strong suppression of transport in the quantum Fock-space dynamics, drawing an analogy to Anderson localization in disordered lattices. The work characterizes the localization length and its scaling with particle number N and driving parameters, demonstrates a spectral crossover from random-matrix to Poisson statistics upon localization, and highlights connections to discrete time crystals.
Significance. If the mapping is faithful and the numerical results robust, this provides a clean, controllable platform for studying Anderson-like transitions directly in many-body Fock space and the interplay between quantum interference and classical chaos in driven bosonic systems. The explicit link to discrete time crystals and the N-scaling analysis are strengths that could inform experiments with ultracold atoms or trapped ions.
major comments (2)
- [Mapping to kicked-top model (near Eq. defining the Floquet operator)] The mapping to the kicked-top model (introduced after the Hamiltonian definition) is load-bearing for the central classical-quantum contrast and Anderson analogy. The manuscript must explicitly derive whether the Floquet operator is unitarily equivalent to the kicked top or only approximates it up to finite-N corrections, interaction renormalization, or extra terms from the specific periodic driving protocol; without this, the observed localization length, its N-dependence, and Poisson spectral statistics could arise from model artifacts rather than genuine MBDL.
- [§4 (localization length scaling)] §4 (numerical results on localization length): the scaling of the localization length with N and driving strength is presented without error bars, convergence checks against Hilbert-space truncation, or explicit rules for data exclusion; this undermines the claim that the suppression is a robust many-body effect rather than a finite-N artifact.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the quantum dynamics reveals 'strong suppression of transport' should be qualified with a brief mention of the diagnostic used (e.g., participation ratio or return probability) to avoid overstatement.
- [Figures] Figure captions (e.g., those showing Fock-space probability distributions): axis labels and color scales should explicitly state the particle number N and driving parameters used, and whether the plots are for a single realization or ensemble average.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We are pleased that the referee recognizes the potential significance of our work on many-body dynamical localization. Below we address each major comment in detail.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Mapping to kicked-top model (near Eq. defining the Floquet operator)] The mapping to the kicked-top model (introduced after the Hamiltonian definition) is load-bearing for the central classical-quantum contrast and Anderson analogy. The manuscript must explicitly derive whether the Floquet operator is unitarily equivalent to the kicked top or only approximates it up to finite-N corrections, interaction renormalization, or extra terms from the specific periodic driving protocol; without this, the observed localization length, its N-dependence, and Poisson spectral statistics could arise from model artifacts rather than genuine MBDL.
Authors: We agree with the referee that an explicit derivation of the mapping is essential to establish the validity of our results. In the revised version, we will include a detailed derivation showing that the Floquet operator for our periodically driven two-mode bosonic system is unitarily equivalent to that of the kicked-top model, with any finite-N corrections explicitly accounted for. This will confirm that the observed localization and spectral statistics arise from genuine many-body dynamical localization rather than artifacts. revision: yes
-
Referee: [§4 (localization length scaling)] §4 (numerical results on localization length): the scaling of the localization length with N and driving strength is presented without error bars, convergence checks against Hilbert-space truncation, or explicit rules for data exclusion; this undermines the claim that the suppression is a robust many-body effect rather than a finite-N artifact.
Authors: We thank the referee for pointing out the lack of error bars and convergence checks in §4. In the revised manuscript, we will add error bars to the localization length scaling plots, include explicit convergence tests with respect to the Hilbert space dimension (truncation), and specify the data selection criteria. These additions will demonstrate the robustness of the N-scaling and the many-body nature of the localization effect. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; derivation chain is self-contained.
full rationale
The paper's central claims rest on a stated mapping of the driven two-mode bosonic system to the kicked-top model, followed by direct comparison of classical mean-field diffusion on the Bloch sphere versus quantum spreading in the (N+1)-dimensional Fock basis. Localization length, N-scaling, and Poisson spectral statistics are extracted from the model's time evolution and eigenstate properties rather than being fitted to or defined in terms of the target observables. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the result to its own inputs appear in the abstract or described derivation. The Anderson analogy is an interpretive observation from the computed suppression of transport, not a tautological re-labeling. This matches the default expectation for an independent model analysis.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption The two-mode bosonic system with periodic driving can be mapped to the kicked-top model while preserving the essential classical chaotic diffusion and quantum interference effects.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
P. W. Anderson, Absence of Diffusion in Certain Ran- dom Lattices, Phys. Rev.109, 1492 (1958)
work page 1958
- [2]
-
[3]
D. R. Grempel, R. E. Prange, and S. Fishman, Quantum dynamics of a nonintegrable system, Phys. Rev. A29, 1639 (1984)
work page 1984
-
[4]
F. L. Moore, J. C. Robinson, C. F. Bharucha, B. Sun- daram, and M. G. Raizen, Atom Optics Realization of the Quantumδ-Kicked Rotor, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 4598 (1995)
work page 1995
-
[5]
J. Chab´ e, G. Lemari´ e, B. Gr´ emaud, D. Delande, P. Szriftgiser, and J. C. Garreau, Experimental Obser- vation of the Anderson Metal-Insulator Transition with Atomic Matter Waves, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 255702 (2008)
work page 2008
-
[6]
G. Lemari´ e, J. Chab´ e, P. Szriftgiser, J. C. Garreau, B. Gr´ emaud, and D. Delande, Observation of the An- derson metal-insulator transition with atomic matter waves: Theory and experiment, Phys. Rev. A80, 043626 (2009)
work page 2009
-
[7]
D. L. Shepelyansky, Coherent propagation of two inter- acting particles in a random potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2607 (1994)
work page 1994
-
[8]
B. L. Altshuler, Y. Gefen, A. Kamenev, and L. S. Levitov, Quasiparticle Lifetime in a Finite System: A Nonperturbative Approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2803 (1997)
work page 1997
-
[9]
I. V. Gornyi, A. D. Mirlin, and D. G. Polyakov, Interact- ing Electrons in Disordered Wires: Anderson Localiza- tion and Low-TTransport, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 206603 (2005)
work page 2005
- [10]
-
[11]
F. Alet and N. Laflorencie, Many-body localization: An introduction and selected topics, Comptes Rendus. Physique19, 498 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[12]
D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Col- loquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and 6 entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 021001 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[13]
P. Sierant, M. Lewenstein, A. Scardicchio, L. Vidmar, and J. Zakrzewski, Many-body localization in the age of classical computing*, Reports on Progress in Physics 88, 026502 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[14]
Hodgman and Pranjal Bordia and Henrik P
Michael Schreiber and Sean S. Hodgman and Pranjal Bordia and Henrik P. L¨ uschen and Mark H. Fischer and Ronen Vosk and Ehud Altman and Ulrich Schneider and Immanuel Bloch, Observation of many-body local- ization of interacting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice, Science349, 842 (2015)
work page 2015
-
[15]
J. yoon Choi, S. Hild, J. Zeiher, P. Schauß, A. Rubio- Abadal, T. Yefsah, V. Khemani, D. A. Huse, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Exploring the many-body localization transition in two dimensions, Science352, 1547 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[16]
F. Borgonovi and D. L. Shepelyansky, Enhancement of localization length for two interacting kicked rotators, Nonlinearity8, 877 (1995)
work page 1995
-
[17]
A. S. Pikovsky and D. L. Shepelyansky, Destruction of anderson localization by a weak nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 094101 (2008)
work page 2008
-
[18]
S. Notarnicola, F. Iemini, D. Rossini, R. Fazio, A. Silva, and A. Russomanno, From localization to anomalous diffusion in the dynamics of coupled kicked rotors, Phys. Rev. E97, 022202 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[19]
S. Notarnicola, A. Silva, R. Fazio, and A. Russomanno, Slow heating in a quantum coupled kicked rotors sys- tem, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Ex- periment2020, 024008 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[20]
S. Lellouch, A. Ran¸ con, S. De Bi` evre, D. Delande, and J. C. Garreau, Dynamics of the mean-field-interacting quantum kicked rotor, Phys. Rev. A101, 043624 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[21]
A. Russomanno, M. Fava, and R. Fazio, Chaos and sub- diffusion in infinite-range coupled quantum kicked ro- tors, Phys. Rev. B103, 224301 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[22]
V. Vuatelet and A. Ran¸ con, Effective thermalization of a many-body dynamically localized Bose gas, Phys. Rev. A104, 043302 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[23]
A. Cao, R. Sajjad, H. Mas, E. Q. Simmons, J. L. Tan- limco, E. Nolasco-Martinez, T. Shimasaki, H. E. Kon- dakci, V. Galitski, and D. M. Weld, Interaction-driven breakdown of dynamical localization in a kicked quan- tum gas, Nature Physics18, 1302 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[24]
J. H. See Toh, K. C. McCormick, X. Tang, Y. Su, X.- W. Luo, C. Zhang, and S. Gupta, Many-body dynamical delocalization in a kicked one-dimensional ultracold gas, Nature Physics18, 1297 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[25]
V. Vuatelet and A. Ran¸ con, Dynamical many-body de- localization transition of a Tonks gas in a quasi-periodic driving potential, Quantum7, 917 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[26]
Y. Guo, S. Dhar, A. Yang, Z. Chen, H. Yao, M. Hor- vath, L. Ying, M. Landini, and H.-C. N¨ agerl, Observa- tion of many-body dynamical localization, Science389, 716 (2025)
work page 2025
- [27]
-
[28]
H. Olsen, P. Vignolo, and M. Albert, Engineer- ing Anderson Localization in Arbitrary Dimensions with Interacting Quasiperiodic Kicked Bosons (2025), arXiv:2511.05344 [cond-mat.quant-gas]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
-
[29]
A. Yang, Z. Chen, Y. Guo, M. Landini, H.-C. N¨ agerl, and L. Ying, Origin and emergent features of many- body dynamical localization, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 123402 (2026)
work page 2026
-
[30]
A. Lazarides, A. Das, and R. Moessner, Fate of Many- Body Localization Under Periodic Driving, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 030402 (2015)
work page 2015
-
[31]
M. Fava, R. Fazio, and A. Russomanno, Many-body dy- namical localization in the kicked Bose-Hubbard chain, Phys. Rev. B101, 064302 (2020)
work page 2020
- [32]
-
[33]
D. A. Abanin, W. De Roeck, and F. Huveneers, The- ory of many-body localization in periodically driven sys- tems, Annals of Physics372, 1 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[34]
T. L. M. Lezama, S. Bera, and J. H. Bardarson, Ap- parent slow dynamics in the ergodic phase of a driven many-body localized system without extensive con- served quantities, Phys. Rev. B99, 161106 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[35]
P. Sierant, M. Lewenstein, A. Scardicchio, and J. Za- krzewski, Stability of many-body localization in Floquet systems, Phys. Rev. B107, 115132 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[36]
A. De Luca and A. Scardicchio, Ergodicity breaking in a model showing many-body localization, Europhysics Letters101, 37003 (2013)
work page 2013
-
[37]
B. Bauer and C. Nayak, Area laws in a many-body lo- calized state and its implications for topological order, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experi- ment2013, P09005 (2013)
work page 2013
- [38]
-
[39]
G. De Tomasi, I. M. Khaymovich, F. Pollmann, and S. Warzel, Rare thermal bubbles at the many-body lo- calization transition from the Fock space point of view, Phys. Rev. B104, 024202 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[40]
T. Scoquart, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Role of fock-space correlations in many-body localization, Phys. Rev. B109, 214203 (2024)
work page 2024
- [41]
-
[42]
K. Nakamura, Y. Okazaki, and A. R. Bishop, Period- ically pulsed spin dynamics: Scaling behavior of semi- classical wave functions, Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 5 (1986)
work page 1986
- [43]
-
[44]
Haake, Can the kicked top be realized?, Journal of Modern Optics47, 2883 (2000)
F. Haake, Can the kicked top be realized?, Journal of Modern Optics47, 2883 (2000)
work page 2000
- [45]
-
[46]
Peres, Chaotic evolution in quantum mechanics, Phys
A. Peres, Chaotic evolution in quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. E53, 4524 (1996)
work page 1996
- [47]
-
[48]
P. A. Miller and S. Sarkar, Signatures of chaos in the en- tanglement of two coupled quantum kicked tops, Phys. Rev. E60, 1542 (1999)
work page 1999
-
[49]
K. ˙Zyczkowski, Localization of eigenstates and mean Wehrl entropy, Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems 7 and Nanostructures9, 583 (2001), proceedings of an International Workshop and Seminar on the Dynamics of Complex Systems
work page 2001
- [50]
-
[51]
Y. S. Weinstein, S. Lloyd, and C. Tsallis, Border be- tween Regular and Chaotic Quantum Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 214101 (2002)
work page 2002
-
[52]
J. N. Bandyopadhyay and A. Lakshminarayan, Entan- glement production in coupled chaotic systems: Case of the kicked tops, Phys. Rev. E69, 016201 (2004)
work page 2004
-
[53]
X. Wang, S. Ghose, B. C. Sanders, and B. Hu, Entan- glement as a signature of quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. E 70, 016217 (2004)
work page 2004
-
[54]
S. Ghose and B. C. Sanders, Entanglement dynamics in chaotic systems, Phys. Rev. A70, 062315 (2004)
work page 2004
-
[55]
R. Demkowicz-Dobrza´ nski and M. Ku´ s, Global entan- gling properties of the coupled kicked tops, Phys. Rev. E70, 066216 (2004)
work page 2004
-
[56]
Y. S. Weinstein and L. Viola, Generalized entanglement as a natural framework for exploring quantum chaos, Europhysics Letters76, 746 (2006)
work page 2006
-
[57]
G. Stamatiou and D. P. Ghikas, Quantum entangle- ment dependence on bifurcations and scars in non- autonomous systems. The case of quantum kicked top, Physics Letters A368, 206 (2007)
work page 2007
- [58]
-
[59]
S. Chaudhury, A. Smith, B. E. Anderson, S. Ghose, and P. S. Jessen, Quantum signatures of chaos in a kicked top, Nature461, 768 (2009)
work page 2009
-
[60]
B. Swingle, G. Bentsen, M. Schleier-Smith, and P. Hay- den, Measuring the scrambling of quantum information, Phys. Rev. A94, 040302 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[61]
C. Neill, P. Roushan, M. Fang, Y. Chen, M. Kolodru- betz, Z. Chen, A. Megrant, R. Barends, B. Campbell, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, E. Jeffrey, J. Kelly, J. Mutus, P. J. J. O’Malley, C. Quintana, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. C. White, A. Polkovnikov, and J. M. Mar- tinis, Ergodic dynamics and thermalization in an iso- lated quantum system, Nature P...
work page 2016
-
[62]
S. Pappalardi, A. Russomanno, B. ˇZunkoviˇ c, F. Iemini, A. Silva, and R. Fazio, Scrambling and entanglement spreading in long-range spin chains, Phys. Rev. B98, 134303 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[63]
A. Piga, M. Lewenstein, and J. Q. Quach, Quantum chaos and entanglement in ergodic and nonergodic sys- tems, Phys. Rev. E99, 032213 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[64]
M. Kumari and S. Ghose, Untangling entanglement and chaos, Phys. Rev. A99, 042311 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[65]
T. Herrmann, M. F. I. Kieler, F. Fritzsch, and A. B¨ acker, Entanglement in coupled kicked tops with chaotic dynamics, Phys. Rev. E101, 022221 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[66]
A. Lerose and S. Pappalardi, Bridging entanglement dy- namics and chaos in semiclassical systems, Phys. Rev. A102, 032404 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[67]
S.-C. Li, L. Pezz` e, and A. Smerzi, Multiparticle entan- glement dynamics of quantum chaos in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A103, 052417 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[68]
Q. Wang and M. Robnik, Statistics of phase space local- ization measures and quantum chaos in the kicked top model, Phys. Rev. E107, 054213 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[69]
S. Omanakuttan, K. Chinni, P. D. Blocher, and P. M. Poggi, Scrambling and quantum chaos indicators from long-time properties of operator distributions, Phys. Rev. A107, 032418 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[70]
F. Haake and D. L. Shepelyansky, The Kicked Rotator as a Limit of the Kicked Top, Europhysics Letters5, 671 (1988)
work page 1988
-
[71]
Sacha, Modeling spontaneous breaking of time- translation symmetry, Phys
K. Sacha, Modeling spontaneous breaking of time- translation symmetry, Phys. Rev. A91, 033617 (2015)
work page 2015
-
[72]
N. Y. Yao, A. C. Potter, I.-D. Potirniche, and A. Vish- wanath, Discrete Time Crystals: Rigidity, Criticality, and Realizations, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 030401 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[73]
S. Choi, J. Choi, R. Landig, G. Kucsko, H. Zhou, J. Isoya, F. Jelezko, S. Onoda, H. Sumiya, V. Khemani, C. von Keyserlingk, N. Y. Yao, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, Observation of discrete time-crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many-body system, Nature543, 221 (2017)
work page 2017
- [74]
-
[75]
K. Sacha and J. Zakrzewski, Time crystals: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics81, 016401 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[76]
M. P. Zaletel, M. Lukin, C. Monroe, C. Nayak, F. Wilczek, and N. Y. Yao, Colloquium: Quantum and classical discrete time crystals, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 031001 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[77]
Although we will consider repulsive interactions, our re- sults do not depend on the sign ofU/k
-
[78]
Schwinger,On Angular Momentum, Tech
J. Schwinger,On Angular Momentum, Tech. Rep. (Har- vard Univ.; Nuclear Development Associates, Inc. (US), 1952)
work page 1952
-
[79]
In the mean-field limit,U→0 asN→ ∞such thatb remains constant; see [80]
-
[80]
See Supplementary Information (that contains Refs. [135, 136, 138, 140]) for additional details on the kicked top, evolutions from different initial states, the effective Anderson Hamiltonian, quantum resonances, the random quantum kicked top and the Kullback-Leibler divergence
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.