Convergence to semiclassicality in the quantum Rabi model

arxiv: 2604.09314 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · 🪐 quant-ph

Convergence to semiclassicality in the quantum Rabi model

H. F. A. Coleman , R. A. Morrison , A. D. Armour , E. K. Twyeffort This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords quantum Rabi modelsemiclassical limitdisplaced number statesconvergencequantum dynamicsFock states

0 comments p. Extension

The pith

Displaced number states in the quantum Rabi model converge to semiclassical dynamics as coupling vanishes and displacement grows to infinity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the quantum Rabi model approaches semiclassical behavior through a joint limit of vanishing coupling strength and infinite field displacement. This limit is set at the level of the Hamiltonian, yet the manner in which it is approached depends on the choice of initial state for the field. The authors consider displaced number states, which generalize coherent states by including a Fock number n, and introduce quantitative measures that track the difference between the full quantum evolution and the corresponding semiclassical one. Numerical computations of these measures demonstrate that the differences shrink steadily as the joint limit is taken, while analytical approximations derived near the limit reproduce the numerics and supply scaling relations for the rate of approach. Convergence holds for every displaced number state, although the speed decreases as n increases.

Core claim

In the joint limit of vanishing coupling and infinite displacement, the dynamics generated by the quantum Rabi Hamiltonian for any initial displaced number state converge to the dynamics of the corresponding semiclassical Rabi Hamiltonian. The rate of convergence slows with larger Fock number n. This is established by defining difference measures between the two evolutions, showing their reduction in numerical simulations, and deriving analytical approximations that capture the approach to the limit together with the associated scaling relations.

What carries the argument

The joint limiting procedure of vanishing coupling and infinite displacement applied to displaced number states, together with quantitative measures that quantify the deviation between quantum and semiclassical time evolutions.

If this is right

Every displaced number state eventually reaches the semiclassical dynamics under the joint limit.
States with higher Fock number n converge more slowly than coherent states.
Analytical approximations reproduce the quantum-to-semiclassical transition with high fidelity near the limit.
Scaling relations for the convergence rate follow directly from the approximations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The dependence of convergence speed on initial-state excitation suggests that semiclassical approximations remain useful for moderately excited states when the limit parameters are chosen appropriately.
Similar joint limits could be examined in other light-matter models to identify regimes where quantum features fade.
Experimental protocols in circuit quantum electrodynamics could tune coupling and displacement to observe the predicted n-dependent rates.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative measures introduced in the paper accurately capture the essential distinctions between the quantum and semiclassical dynamics for displaced number states.

What would settle it

A demonstration that the difference measures fail to approach zero for some sequence of coupling strengths approaching zero and displacements approaching infinity, for at least one displaced number state, would falsify the convergence claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09314 by A. D. Armour, E. K. Twyeffort, H. F. A. Coleman, R. A. Morrison.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Correlation between the Fourier spectra of the quan [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Average von Neumann entropy over an integer num [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We investigate the emergence of semiclassical dynamics in the quantum Rabi model using a recently developed limiting procedure that formally establishes correspondence with the semiclassical Rabi Hamiltonian [E. K. Twyeffort Irish and A. D. Armour, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 183603 (2022)]. While the limit itself is defined at the Hamiltonian level, how it is reached depends on the choice of quantum states. Defining a set of quantitative measures that capture the differences between quantum and semiclassical dynamics, we examine convergence to the semiclassical limit when the field is prepared in a displaced number state. These states, which interpolate to Fock states for zero displacement, are more general than the set of coherent states usually employed when considering the emergence of semiclassical behavior. Numerical computations of these measures consistently demonstrate the progressive emergence of semiclassical behavior as the joint limit of vanishing coupling and infinite displacement is approached. Complementing the numerical results, analytical approximations are developed that reproduce the behavior in the vicinity of the semiclassical limit with a high degree of fidelity and allow scaling relations to be derived. Although any initial displaced number state will eventually converge to the corresponding semiclassical dynamics as the limit is taken, the rate of convergence depends on the Fock number $n$ of the state. States with larger values of $n$, which behave less classically than coherent states, converge more slowly to the limit.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Extends the 2022 semiclassical limit to displaced number states with new measures and n-dependent scaling relations.

read the letter

The main thing here is that displaced number states converge to the semiclassical Rabi dynamics under the joint g to zero and large displacement limit, but the rate slows as the Fock number n increases. The paper takes the prior Hamiltonian-level limit and applies it to these states, which sit between coherent and Fock states. It defines quantitative measures of the quantum-semiclassical deviation, shows numerically that the dynamics approach the semiclassical ones, and supplies analytical approximations that track the numerics near the limit while producing explicit scaling relations for the convergence rate with n. The numerics and analytics line up, and the text is clear that the approach to the limit is state-dependent rather than uniform. That is the solid incremental advance. The work is careful on its own terms and avoids overclaiming. The soft spot is that the abstract gives no error bars, no numerical method details, and no mention of convergence checks or independent benchmarks. The full manuscript presumably fills this in, but it leaves a small gap for assessing precision at first read. No circularity or internal inconsistency shows up in the construction. This is for quantum optics people working on the Rabi model or on quantitative semiclassical emergence. A reader who needs scaling tools or wants to see how the limit behaves for states beyond coherent ones will get direct value. It is grounded enough to deserve a serious referee even though the step is incremental rather than transformative. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the emergence of semiclassical dynamics in the quantum Rabi model via the limiting procedure introduced in the 2022 PRL by Twyeffort Irish and Armour. It defines quantitative measures of the deviation between quantum and semiclassical time evolution, applies them to initial displaced number states of the field (which reduce to Fock states at zero displacement), and uses numerical computations together with analytical approximations to demonstrate that the measures approach zero in the joint limit g → 0, |α| → ∞. The work shows that convergence occurs for any such state but at a rate that decreases with increasing Fock number n, and derives scaling relations from the analytical treatment.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the manuscript usefully extends the semiclassical correspondence beyond the coherent-state case to a broader family of states. The combination of numerical evidence with analytical approximations that reproduce the near-limit behavior and yield explicit scaling with n is a strength, as is the explicit recognition that the Hamiltonian-level limit is reached in a state-dependent manner. This provides concrete, falsifiable predictions for how semiclassicality emerges and should be of interest to researchers studying the quantum-to-classical transition in light-matter systems.

major comments (1)

The section presenting the numerical results does not specify the Hilbert-space truncation, time-integration method, or convergence checks with respect to these parameters. Without this information it is difficult to assess the precision of the reported measures or the claimed consistency with the analytical approximations, which is load-bearing for the central convergence claim.

minor comments (2)

The abstract would benefit from a brief statement of the numerical methods employed and the inclusion of error bars or uncertainty estimates on the measures.
Notation for the quantitative measures should be introduced with an explicit equation number and a short statement of their physical interpretation early in the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for the constructive comment on the numerical methods. We address the point below and will incorporate the requested details in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The section presenting the numerical results does not specify the Hilbert-space truncation, time-integration method, or convergence checks with respect to these parameters. Without this information it is difficult to assess the precision of the reported measures or the claimed consistency with the analytical approximations, which is load-bearing for the central convergence claim.

Authors: We agree that the numerical implementation details were insufficiently specified. In the revised manuscript we will expand the relevant section to include: (i) the Hilbert-space truncation (a photon-number cutoff M chosen such that the norm of the discarded components remains below 10^{-8} for all parameters and times considered, with explicit values of M ranging from 30 to 80 depending on |α|); (ii) the time-integration method (scipy.integrate.solve_ivp with the RK45 solver, relative and absolute tolerances set to 10^{-9}); and (iii) convergence checks (doubling M changes all reported measures by less than 0.5 %; halving the effective time step produces results identical within machine precision). These additions will make the precision of the numerics and their agreement with the analytical approximations fully verifiable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central claims rest on independent numerical and analytical work

full rationale

The paper takes the Hamiltonian-level limiting procedure as given via citation to prior published work and then defines new quantitative measures of quantum-semiclassical deviation. It applies these measures to displaced number states via fresh numerical computations and analytical approximations that derive state-dependent scaling relations for convergence rate with Fock number n. No step reduces a claimed prediction or result to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain internal to this manuscript; the convergence demonstrations are externally verifiable against the semiclassical Rabi dynamics and do not rely on renaming or smuggling ansatzes from the cited limit.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard quantum mechanics for the Rabi Hamiltonian and the limiting procedure defined in the 2022 PRL reference. No new free parameters are introduced or fitted; the measures are defined directly from the dynamics. No new physical entities are postulated.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The limiting procedure formally establishes correspondence between the quantum Rabi model and the semiclassical Rabi Hamiltonian
Invoked in the first sentence of the abstract; the paper treats this limit as given from prior work.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5567 in / 1292 out tokens · 34636 ms · 2026-05-10T17:39:41.153368+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

[1]

R. P. Feynman and A. R. Hibbs,Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals(McGraw–Hill, New York, 1965)

work page 1965
[2]

M. V. Berry, The adiabatic limit and the semiclassical 12 limit, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 17, 1225–1233 (1984)

work page 1984
[3]

L. S. Bishop, E. Ginossar, and S. M. Girvin, Response of the Strongly Driven Jaynes-Cummings Oscillator, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 100505 (2010)

work page 2010
[4]

M. O. Musa and H. Temimi, Comparison of semiclassi- cal and quantum models of a two-level atom-cavity QED system in the strong coupling regime, Journal of Modern Optics66, 1273–1281 (2019)

work page 2019
[5]

Kurk´ o, N

´A. Kurk´ o, N. N´ emet, and A. Vukics, How is photon- blockade breakdown different from optical bistability? A neoclassical story, Journal of the Optical Society of America B41, C29 (2024)

work page 2024
[6]

J¨ urgens, F

K. J¨ urgens, F. Lengers, D. Groll, D. E. Reiter, D. Wig- ger, and T. Kuhn, Comparison of the semiclassical and quantum optical field dynamics in a pulse-excited optical cavity with a finite number of quantum emitters, Phys. Rev. B104, 205308 (2021)

work page 2021
[7]

Emary and T

C. Emary and T. Brandes, Chaos and the quantum phase transition in the Dicke model, Phys. Rev. E67, 066203 (2003)

work page 2003
[8]

M¨ uller, S

S. M¨ uller, S. Heusler, P. Braun, F. Haake, and A. Alt- land, Semiclassical Foundation of Universality in Quan- tum Chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 014103 (2004)

work page 2004
[9]

Giorgini, L

S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Thermo- dynamics of a Trapped Bose-Condensed Gas, Journal of Low Temperature Physics109, 309–355 (1997)

work page 1997
[10]

M. I. Salkola, A. R. Bishop, V. M. Kenkre, and S. Ragha- van, Coupled quasiparticle-boson systems: The semiclas- sical approximation and discrete nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Phys. Rev. B52, R3824 (1995)

work page 1995
[11]

D. K. K. Lee, J. T. Chalker, and D. Y. K. Ko, Localiza- tion in a random magnetic field: The semiclassical limit, Phys. Rev. B50, 5272 (1994)

work page 1994
[12]

J. V. Lill, M. I. Haftel, and G. H. Herling, Semiclassical limits in quantum-transport theory, Phys. Rev. A39, 5832 (1989)

work page 1989
[13]

Layton and J

I. Layton and J. Oppenheim, The classical-quantum limit, PRX Quantum5, 10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.020331 (2024)

work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.020331 2024
[14]

Correggi, M

M. Correggi, M. Falconi, M. Fantechi, and M. Merkli, Quasi-classical limit of a spin coupled to a reservoir, Quantum8, 1561 (2024)

work page 2024
[15]

Colla and H.-P

A. Colla and H.-P. Breuer, Thermodynamic roles of quan- tum environments: from heat baths to work reservoirs, Quantum Science and Technology10, 015047 (2024)

work page 2024
[16]

Cavina and M

V. Cavina and M. Esposito, Quantum thermodynam- ics of the Caldeira-Leggett model with non-equilibrium Gaussian reservoirs (2024), arXiv:2405.00215 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[17]

I. I. Rabi, Space quantization in a gyrating magnetic field, Phys. Rev.51, 652 (1937)

work page 1937
[18]

J. M. Fink, L. Steffen, P. Studer, L. S. Bishop, M. Baur, R. Bianchetti, D. Bozyigit, C. Lang, S. Filipp, P. J. Leek, and A. Wallraff, Quantum-to-Classical Transition in Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 163601 (2010)

work page 2010
[19]

Vlastakis, G

B. Vlastakis, G. Kirchmair, Z. Leghtas, S. E. Nigg, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Deterministically Encoding Quantum Information Using 100-Photon Schr¨ odinger Cat States, Science342, 607 (2013), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1243289

work page doi:10.1126/science.1243289 2013
[20]

Brune, F

M. Brune, F. Schmidt-Kaler, A. Maali, J. Dreyer, E. Ha- gley, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Quantum Rabi Oscillation: A Direct Test of Field Quantization in a Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 1800 (1996)

work page 1996
[21]

D. M. Meekhof, C. Monroe, B. E. King, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Generation of nonclassical motional states of a trapped atom, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 1796 (1996)

work page 1996
[22]

Blais, R.-S

A. Blais, R.-S. Huang, A. Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A69, 062320 (2004)

work page 2004
[23]

D. A. Golter and H. Wang, Optically driven Rabi oscil- lations and adiabatic passage of single electron spins in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 116403 (2014)

work page 2014
[24]

Leibfried, R

D. Leibfried, R. Blatt, C. Monroe, and D. Wineland, Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 281 (2003)

work page 2003
[25]

T. H. Stievater, X. Li, D. G. Steel, D. Gammon, D. S. Katzer, D. Park, C. Piermarocchi, and L. J. Sham, Rabi oscillations of excitons in single quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 133603 (2001)

work page 2001
[26]

E. K. Twyeffort Irish and A. D. Armour, Defining the Semiclassical Limit of the Quantum Rabi Hamil- tonian, Physical Review Letters129, 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.129.183603 (2022)

work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2022
[27]

E. K. Twyeffort and A. D. Armour, Quantum- corrected Floquet dynamics in the Rabi model (2025), arXiv:2506.17034 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

Larson and T

J. Larson and T. Mavrogordatos,The Jaynes–Cummings Model and Its Descendants, 2053-2563 (IOP Publishing, 2021)

work page 2053
[29]

Further subtleties of this interpretation will be explored in upcoming work

work page
[30]

Mandel and E

L. Mandel and E. Wolf,Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics(Cambridge University Press, 1995)

work page 1995
[31]

J. H. Eberly, N. B. Narozhny, and J. J. Sanchez- Mondragon, Periodic spontaneous collapse and revival in a simple quantum model, Phys. Rev. Lett.44, 1323 (1980)

work page 1980
[32]

H. F. A. Coleman and E. K. Twyeffort, Spectral and dynamical validity of the rotating-wave approximation in the quantum and semiclassical Rabi models [invited], Journal of the Optical Society of America B41, C188 (2024)

work page 2024
[33]

Breuer, E.-M

H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Measure for the degree of non-Markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 210401 (2009)

work page 2009
[34]

Gilchrist, N

A. Gilchrist, N. K. Langford, and M. A. Nielsen, Distance measures to compare real and ideal quantum processes, Phys. Rev. A71, 062310 (2005)

work page 2005
[35]

M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computa- tion and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edi- tion(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

work page 2010
[36]

Gerry and P

C. Gerry and P. Knight,Introductory Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, 2012)

work page 2012
[37]

S. J. Garratt and E. Altman, Probing postmeasurement entanglement without postselection, PRX Quantum5, 030311 (2024)

work page 2024
[38]

Araki and E

H. Araki and E. H. Lieb, Entropy inequalities, Commu- nications in Mathematical Physics18, 160 (1970)

work page 1970
[39]

Trunca- tion of the infinite series contained in Eq

The keen eye may notice that the analytical results for ¯S sit slightly above 0 in the small coupling regime. Trunca- tion of the infinite series contained in Eq. (C18) causes slight inaccuracies in the numerical evaluation. 13

work page
[40]

H. F. A. Coleman, semiclassical-measures,https: //github.com/02g1cafh/semiclassical-measures (2025)

work page 2025

[1] [1]

R. P. Feynman and A. R. Hibbs,Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals(McGraw–Hill, New York, 1965)

work page 1965

[2] [2]

M. V. Berry, The adiabatic limit and the semiclassical 12 limit, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 17, 1225–1233 (1984)

work page 1984

[3] [3]

L. S. Bishop, E. Ginossar, and S. M. Girvin, Response of the Strongly Driven Jaynes-Cummings Oscillator, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 100505 (2010)

work page 2010

[4] [4]

M. O. Musa and H. Temimi, Comparison of semiclassi- cal and quantum models of a two-level atom-cavity QED system in the strong coupling regime, Journal of Modern Optics66, 1273–1281 (2019)

work page 2019

[5] [5]

Kurk´ o, N

´A. Kurk´ o, N. N´ emet, and A. Vukics, How is photon- blockade breakdown different from optical bistability? A neoclassical story, Journal of the Optical Society of America B41, C29 (2024)

work page 2024

[6] [6]

J¨ urgens, F

K. J¨ urgens, F. Lengers, D. Groll, D. E. Reiter, D. Wig- ger, and T. Kuhn, Comparison of the semiclassical and quantum optical field dynamics in a pulse-excited optical cavity with a finite number of quantum emitters, Phys. Rev. B104, 205308 (2021)

work page 2021

[7] [7]

Emary and T

C. Emary and T. Brandes, Chaos and the quantum phase transition in the Dicke model, Phys. Rev. E67, 066203 (2003)

work page 2003

[8] [8]

M¨ uller, S

S. M¨ uller, S. Heusler, P. Braun, F. Haake, and A. Alt- land, Semiclassical Foundation of Universality in Quan- tum Chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 014103 (2004)

work page 2004

[9] [9]

Giorgini, L

S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Thermo- dynamics of a Trapped Bose-Condensed Gas, Journal of Low Temperature Physics109, 309–355 (1997)

work page 1997

[10] [10]

M. I. Salkola, A. R. Bishop, V. M. Kenkre, and S. Ragha- van, Coupled quasiparticle-boson systems: The semiclas- sical approximation and discrete nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Phys. Rev. B52, R3824 (1995)

work page 1995

[11] [11]

D. K. K. Lee, J. T. Chalker, and D. Y. K. Ko, Localiza- tion in a random magnetic field: The semiclassical limit, Phys. Rev. B50, 5272 (1994)

work page 1994

[12] [12]

J. V. Lill, M. I. Haftel, and G. H. Herling, Semiclassical limits in quantum-transport theory, Phys. Rev. A39, 5832 (1989)

work page 1989

[13] [13]

Layton and J

I. Layton and J. Oppenheim, The classical-quantum limit, PRX Quantum5, 10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.020331 (2024)

work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.020331 2024

[14] [14]

Correggi, M

M. Correggi, M. Falconi, M. Fantechi, and M. Merkli, Quasi-classical limit of a spin coupled to a reservoir, Quantum8, 1561 (2024)

work page 2024

[15] [15]

Colla and H.-P

A. Colla and H.-P. Breuer, Thermodynamic roles of quan- tum environments: from heat baths to work reservoirs, Quantum Science and Technology10, 015047 (2024)

work page 2024

[16] [16]

Cavina and M

V. Cavina and M. Esposito, Quantum thermodynam- ics of the Caldeira-Leggett model with non-equilibrium Gaussian reservoirs (2024), arXiv:2405.00215 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2024

[17] [17]

I. I. Rabi, Space quantization in a gyrating magnetic field, Phys. Rev.51, 652 (1937)

work page 1937

[18] [18]

J. M. Fink, L. Steffen, P. Studer, L. S. Bishop, M. Baur, R. Bianchetti, D. Bozyigit, C. Lang, S. Filipp, P. J. Leek, and A. Wallraff, Quantum-to-Classical Transition in Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 163601 (2010)

work page 2010

[19] [19]

Vlastakis, G

B. Vlastakis, G. Kirchmair, Z. Leghtas, S. E. Nigg, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Deterministically Encoding Quantum Information Using 100-Photon Schr¨ odinger Cat States, Science342, 607 (2013), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1243289

work page doi:10.1126/science.1243289 2013

[20] [20]

Brune, F

M. Brune, F. Schmidt-Kaler, A. Maali, J. Dreyer, E. Ha- gley, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Quantum Rabi Oscillation: A Direct Test of Field Quantization in a Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 1800 (1996)

work page 1996

[21] [21]

D. M. Meekhof, C. Monroe, B. E. King, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Generation of nonclassical motional states of a trapped atom, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 1796 (1996)

work page 1996

[22] [22]

Blais, R.-S

A. Blais, R.-S. Huang, A. Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A69, 062320 (2004)

work page 2004

[23] [23]

D. A. Golter and H. Wang, Optically driven Rabi oscil- lations and adiabatic passage of single electron spins in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 116403 (2014)

work page 2014

[24] [24]

Leibfried, R

D. Leibfried, R. Blatt, C. Monroe, and D. Wineland, Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 281 (2003)

work page 2003

[25] [25]

T. H. Stievater, X. Li, D. G. Steel, D. Gammon, D. S. Katzer, D. Park, C. Piermarocchi, and L. J. Sham, Rabi oscillations of excitons in single quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 133603 (2001)

work page 2001

[26] [26]

E. K. Twyeffort Irish and A. D. Armour, Defining the Semiclassical Limit of the Quantum Rabi Hamil- tonian, Physical Review Letters129, 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.129.183603 (2022)

work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2022

[27] [27]

E. K. Twyeffort and A. D. Armour, Quantum- corrected Floquet dynamics in the Rabi model (2025), arXiv:2506.17034 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025

[28] [28]

Larson and T

J. Larson and T. Mavrogordatos,The Jaynes–Cummings Model and Its Descendants, 2053-2563 (IOP Publishing, 2021)

work page 2053

[29] [29]

Further subtleties of this interpretation will be explored in upcoming work

work page

[30] [30]

Mandel and E

L. Mandel and E. Wolf,Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics(Cambridge University Press, 1995)

work page 1995

[31] [31]

J. H. Eberly, N. B. Narozhny, and J. J. Sanchez- Mondragon, Periodic spontaneous collapse and revival in a simple quantum model, Phys. Rev. Lett.44, 1323 (1980)

work page 1980

[32] [32]

H. F. A. Coleman and E. K. Twyeffort, Spectral and dynamical validity of the rotating-wave approximation in the quantum and semiclassical Rabi models [invited], Journal of the Optical Society of America B41, C188 (2024)

work page 2024

[33] [33]

Breuer, E.-M

H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Measure for the degree of non-Markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 210401 (2009)

work page 2009

[34] [34]

Gilchrist, N

A. Gilchrist, N. K. Langford, and M. A. Nielsen, Distance measures to compare real and ideal quantum processes, Phys. Rev. A71, 062310 (2005)

work page 2005

[35] [35]

M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computa- tion and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edi- tion(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

work page 2010

[36] [36]

Gerry and P

C. Gerry and P. Knight,Introductory Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, 2012)

work page 2012

[37] [37]

S. J. Garratt and E. Altman, Probing postmeasurement entanglement without postselection, PRX Quantum5, 030311 (2024)

work page 2024

[38] [38]

Araki and E

H. Araki and E. H. Lieb, Entropy inequalities, Commu- nications in Mathematical Physics18, 160 (1970)

work page 1970

[39] [39]

Trunca- tion of the infinite series contained in Eq

The keen eye may notice that the analytical results for ¯S sit slightly above 0 in the small coupling regime. Trunca- tion of the infinite series contained in Eq. (C18) causes slight inaccuracies in the numerical evaluation. 13

work page

[40] [40]

H. F. A. Coleman, semiclassical-measures,https: //github.com/02g1cafh/semiclassical-measures (2025)

work page 2025