arxiv: 2604.09641 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-22 · 🧮 math.AP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

On some 1D nonlocal models with coefficients changing sign

Maha Daoud

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 06:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP

keywords nonlocal elliptic problemstransmission problemssign-changing coefficientsfractional modelsT-coercivityfinite element discretizationconvergence analysisinterface lifting

0 comments

The pith

Reconstructed nonlocal fractional models converge to local transmission problems with sign-changing coefficients.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper investigates one-dimensional nonlocal elliptic transmission problems where the coefficients can change sign across an interface. For a simplified nonlocal setting where the cross-interaction coefficient is zero, it establishes a weak T-coercivity property and constructs a reformulation using an explicit interface lifting. A finite element discretization of this reformulated model is shown to converge to the corresponding local transmission problem when the fractional order approaches one and the mesh size approaches zero. This provides a numerical bridge between nonlocal and local models in cases that are challenging due to the sign changes.

Core claim

Under the assumption that the cross-interaction coefficient vanishes, the global fractional problem satisfies a weak T-coercivity result. This enables a reconstructed formulation via an explicit interface lifting. The simplified finite element discretization of this model converges to the classical local transmission problem as the fractional parameter s approaches 1 from below and the mesh size h approaches 0 from above.

What carries the argument

The reconstructed formulation based on explicit interface lifting, which carries the convergence proof from the nonlocal to the local setting.

If this is right

The method is stable for the simplified nonlocal model in one dimension.
Numerical simulations confirm the stability and consistency of the approach.
A preliminary extension to two dimensions is possible.
Convergence holds in the combined limit of s to 1 and h to 0.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The technique of interface lifting could be adapted to other nonlocal operators or dimensions for handling sign-changing coefficients.
This convergence result suggests that nonlocal models can serve as regularizations for local problems with critical contrasts.
Exploring cases where the cross-interaction coefficient does not vanish might require different reconstruction strategies.

Load-bearing premise

The cross-interaction coefficient must vanish for the weak T-coercivity to hold in the nonlocal setting.

What would settle it

A numerical experiment showing that the finite element solutions do not approach the local transmission solution for sufficiently small mesh sizes and fractional orders close to 1 would falsify the convergence result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09641 by Maha Daoud.

**Figure 2.1.** Figure 2.1: The function φ for b = 0.7 The well-posedness of Problem (2.2) in the Hadamard sense is ensured by the T-coercivity of the bilinear form a. More precisely, it suffices to find an isomorphism T ∈ L(H1 0 (I)) and α > 0 such that |a(v, T v)| ≥ α∥v∥ 2 H1 0 (I) ∀v ∈ H1 0 (I). Theorem 2.1 (T-coercivity and characterization of the kernel). Let f ∈ H−1 (I). Then the following assertions hold: (i) If |σ2| σ1 ̸= … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.2.** Figure 2.2: The function φ s for b = 0.7 and s = 0.8 Remark 2.3. A natural question is why one does not simply choose φ. Our viewpoint is that, to obtain a meaningful nonlocal-to-local limit, it is natural to start from a genuinely nonlocal lifting and recover φ appearing only in the limit s → 1 −. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.1.** Figure 3.1: Structure of the stiffness matrix B Let us denote, — H(h, s) := h 1−2s 2s(1 − s)(1 − 2s)(3 − 2s) (s ̸= 1 2 ) ; — H1(h, s) := h 1−2s s(3 − 2s) ; — H2(h, s) := ( 2H(h, s)[−2s 2 + 7s − 7 + 23−2s ] if s ̸= 1 2 , −5 + 8 log(2) if s = 1 2 ; — H3(h, s) := h 1−2s (1 − s)(3 − 2s) ; — H4(h, s) := ( 2H(h, s)[2s 2 − 5s + 4 − 2 2−2s ] if s ̸= 1 2 , 3 − 4 log(2) if s = 1 2 ; — H5(h, s) := H(h, s)[1 − 2s] ; 17 [PITH_F… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.2.** Figure 3.2: Structure of the stiffness matrix K Ak (k = 1, 2) is the corresponding stiffness matrix to (3.5), Di = C(s) 2 Z R Z R σ(x, y) (φ s (x) − φ s (y))(ϕi(x) − ϕi(y)) |x − y| 1+2s dy dx ∀i ∈ J1, NhK \ {M}, c ∗ = C(s) 2 Z R Z R σ(x, y) |φ s (x) − φ s (y)| 2 |x − y| 1+2s dy dx, Gi = Z I fϕi for any i ∈ J1, NhK \ {M} and GM = Z I fφs . In the matrix K, the positions of the entries D and c ∗ depend on the location… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.3.** Figure 3.3: Structure of the stiffness matrix K∗ This greatly simplifies the assembly and resolution of the linear system while preserving the core mechanism of enrichment via φ s . The simplified model therefore approximates the solution as 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_3_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.1.** Figure 4.1: Behavior of Cb(s) C(s) and its reciprocal Then, solving (−∆)sui = f in Ii is equivalent to solve (\−∆)sui = fbin Ii . Thanks to [18, Theorem 1], we have (4.5) ∥u s 0 − u∥ 2 Hes(Ii) = C(s) Cb(s) ∥u s 0 − u∥ 2 s ≤ ∥u s 0 − u∥ 2 s ≤ K " 1 − s + [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_4_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.1.** Figure 5.1: Comparison of solutions for the (exact) local, old, new, and simplified new models. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_5_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.2.** Figure 5.2: Comparison of solutions for the (exact) local, old, new, and simplified new models. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_5_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.3.** Figure 5.3: Convergence behavior of the H1 -error with respect to (1−s)for the four configurations of (SNM), with h = 2−9 and α = 0. In all cases, the numerical error exhibits a clear linear behavior with respect to (1 − s) in log-log scale. More precisely, the numerical curves are parallel to the reference line O(1 − s) suggesting that ∥eh∥H1 = O(1 − s) as s → 1 −, uniformly with respect to the tested configuration… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.4.** Figure 5.4: Convergence of nonlocal models towards the local one as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_5_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.5.** Figure 5.5: Convergence of nonlocal models towards the local one as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_5_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.6.** Figure 5.6: Convergence behavior of the H1 -error with respect to (1 − s) and h for two configurations of (SNM). ■ Before concluding the 1D study, we point out an additional advantage of the simplified nonlocal model. Besides its well-posedness and its consistency with the local limit as s → 1 −, the formulation naturally extends to a multi-subdomain setting. Each subdomain can then be treated independently at the d… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.7.** Figure 5.7: Schematic block structure of the global discrete system in a multi-subdomain setting. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_5_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: shows the two solutions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.1.** Figure 6.1: Comparison of the solutions of old and simplified new models for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_6_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.2.** Figure 6.2: Comparison of the solutions of old and simplified new models for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_6_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

In this work, we study one-dimensional nonlocal elliptic transmission problems with piecewise constant coefficients that may change sign across an interface. In the local setting, we recall the T-coercive structure of the problem and characterize the critical contrast case. In the nonlocal setting, we focus on a simplified configuration in which the cross-interaction coefficient vanishes. Under this assumption, we prove a weak T-coercivity result for the global fractional problem and introduce a reconstructed formulation based on an explicit interface lifting. Then, we consider a simplified finite element discretization of the reconstructed model and prove its convergence toward the classical local transmission problem as the fractional parameter $s\to 1^-$ and the mesh size $h\to 0^+$. Numerical simulations in 1D illustrate the stability and consistency of the method, and a preliminary two-dimensional extension is presented as an exploratory perspective.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper proves weak T-coercivity and FEM convergence for a nonlocal 1D transmission problem, but only after forcing the cross-interaction coefficient to vanish.

read the letter

The core result here is a weak T-coercivity statement for the fractional problem together with a reconstructed formulation that uses an explicit interface lift, followed by a convergence proof for a simple finite-element scheme as s goes to 1 and h goes to 0. That package is new relative to the local T-coercive literature the authors cite, and the 1D numerics appear to back it up without obvious instability. The reconstruction step is a clean way to recover the local transmission condition from the nonlocal one under the stated assumptions. The main limitation is the vanishing cross-interaction coefficient. The local theory recalled in the paper handles general sign-changing piecewise constants, including critical contrast, yet the nonlocal analysis requires this extra simplification to close the estimates. Without it the interface terms do not seem to be controlled, so the headline convergence applies only to this reduced class rather than the full family advertised in the title. The two-dimensional extension is presented as exploratory and does not carry the same proofs. Readers working on fractional transmission problems or on numerical schemes that pass to the local limit will find the reconstructed formulation and the convergence argument useful. The work is technically coherent on its own terms and supplies enough explicit steps that a referee can check the estimates directly. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper studies one-dimensional nonlocal elliptic transmission problems with piecewise constant coefficients that may change sign across an interface. In the local setting it recalls the T-coercive structure and characterizes the critical contrast case. In the nonlocal setting it restricts attention to the case where the cross-interaction coefficient vanishes, proves a weak T-coercivity result for the global fractional problem, introduces a reconstructed formulation based on an explicit interface lifting, and proves convergence of a simplified finite-element discretization of the reconstructed model to the classical local transmission problem as s→1− and h→0+. Numerical simulations in 1D and a preliminary 2D extension are presented.

Significance. If the results hold under the stated assumptions, the work supplies an explicit reconstruction and convergence analysis that links a nonlocal model to its local limit in a simplified sign-changing-coefficient setting. The interface-lifting construction and the joint s→1−/h→0+ limit for the finite-element scheme could serve as a template for numerical analysis of fractional transmission problems, provided the vanishing-cross-interaction restriction can be relaxed or clearly delimited.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract (and the nonlocal-analysis paragraphs): the weak T-coercivity result, the explicit interface lifting, and the subsequent FE convergence to the local transmission problem are all established only after imposing that the cross-interaction coefficient vanishes. This assumption is load-bearing for the estimates; without it the nonlocal interface terms are not controlled. The title and the local-section discussion advertise results for general sign-changing piecewise constants, yet the headline nonlocal convergence applies only to this reduced class.
[Abstract] The passage from the reconstructed nonlocal formulation to the local limit (as s→1− and h→0+) relies on the same vanishing-cross-interaction simplification. The manuscript should either extend the lifting construction to nonzero cross-interaction or state explicitly that the convergence theorem holds only in the vanishing case; otherwise the claim that the method converges “toward the classical local transmission problem” for sign-changing coefficients is overstated.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract uses the notation s→1− and h→0+ without first defining the fractional parameter s or the mesh size h; a brief parenthetical reminder would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We agree that the vanishing cross-interaction assumption is essential to our nonlocal analysis and will revise the abstract and relevant sections to state this limitation more explicitly, ensuring the claims accurately reflect the scope of the results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and the nonlocal-analysis paragraphs): the weak T-coercivity result, the explicit interface lifting, and the subsequent FE convergence to the local transmission problem are all established only after imposing that the cross-interaction coefficient vanishes. This assumption is load-bearing for the estimates; without it the nonlocal interface terms are not controlled. The title and the local-section discussion advertise results for general sign-changing piecewise constants, yet the headline nonlocal convergence applies only to this reduced class.

Authors: We acknowledge that the vanishing of the cross-interaction coefficient is crucial for controlling the nonlocal interface terms and enabling the weak T-coercivity result, the explicit lifting, and the FE convergence analysis. The abstract already specifies that we focus on this simplified configuration. To address the concern, we will revise the abstract and the nonlocal-analysis paragraphs to state more explicitly that these results hold under the vanishing-cross-interaction assumption. The title employs 'some' to indicate the specific models under consideration, while the local section discusses the general sign-changing case separately; we will add a clarifying remark in the introduction to delineate the scopes. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] The passage from the reconstructed nonlocal formulation to the local limit (as s→1− and h→0+) relies on the same vanishing-cross-interaction simplification. The manuscript should either extend the lifting construction to nonzero cross-interaction or state explicitly that the convergence theorem holds only in the vanishing case; otherwise the claim that the method converges “toward the classical local transmission problem” for sign-changing coefficients is overstated.

Authors: We agree that the convergence result as s→1− and h→0+ is proven only under the vanishing cross-interaction assumption. We will revise the statement of the convergence theorem and the abstract to explicitly indicate that the result holds in this simplified case. Extending the interface-lifting construction to nonzero cross-interaction would require new estimates for additional uncontrolled interface terms and is beyond the scope of the present work. The revised claims will avoid any overstatement regarding the general sign-changing setting. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents a sequence of mathematical proofs: recalling the standard T-coercive structure for the local transmission problem with sign-changing coefficients, then proving weak T-coercivity for the nonlocal fractional problem only after explicitly imposing that the cross-interaction coefficient vanishes, followed by an explicit interface lifting reconstruction and a finite-element convergence argument as s→1− and h→0+. These steps invoke standard functional-analytic tools (T-coercivity estimates, lifting operators, and passage to the limit) rather than any fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The vanishing-coefficient assumption is stated upfront as a simplification required for the estimates and is not derived from the target result; the local case is treated separately without reduction. No equation is shown to equal its input by construction, and the derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks of elliptic theory.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard background results from fractional Sobolev spaces and nonlocal operator theory; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

standard math Standard properties of fractional Sobolev spaces and the fractional Laplacian
Invoked throughout the nonlocal analysis and convergence statements.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5433 in / 1231 out tokens · 46267 ms · 2026-05-15T06:51:06.257420+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

we prove a weak T-coercivity result for the global fractional problem and introduce a reconstructed formulation based on an explicit interface lifting... convergence toward the classical local transmission problem as s→1− and h→0+
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

σ3 = 0... |σ2|/σ1 ≠ Φ1/Φ2... weakly T-coercive

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Acosta, F.M

G. Acosta, F.M. Bersetche, J.P. Borthagaray :A Short FE Implementation for a 2D Homogeneous Dirichlet Problem of a Fractional Laplacian. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 74 (2017), 784–816

work page 2017
[2]

Acosta, J.P

G. Acosta, J.P. Borthagaray :A Fractional Laplace Equation: Regularity of Solutions and Finite Ele- ment Approximations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 55(2) (2017), 472–495

work page 2017
[3]

A Finite Element approximation of the one-dimensional fractional Poisson equation with applications to numerical control

U. Biccari, V. Hernández-Santamaría :A Finite Element Approximation of the One-Dimensional Frac- tional Poisson Equation with Applications to Numerical Control. arXiv:1707.06769, 2017

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[4]

Bianchi, L

F. Bianchi, L. Brasco, A.C. Zagati :On the Sharp Hardy Inequality in Sobolev–Slobodeckii Spaces. Mathematische Annalen 390 (2024), 493–555

work page 2024
[5]

Computing and Visualization in Science 19 (2018), 19–46

A.Bonito,J.P.Borthagaray,R.H.Nochetto,E.Otárola,A.J.Salgado:NumericalMethodsforFractional Diffusion. Computing and Visualization in Science 19 (2018), 19–46

work page 2018
[6]

Bonito, W

A. Bonito, W. Lei, J.E. Pasciak :Numerical Approximation of the Integral Fractional Laplacian. Nu- merische Mathematik 142 (2019), 235–278

work page 2019
[7]

Bonnet-Ben Dhia, L

A.-S. Bonnet-Ben Dhia, L. Chesnel, P. Ciarlet Jr. :T-coercivity for Scalar Interface Problems between DielectricsandMetamaterials.ESAIM:MathematicalModellingandNumericalAnalysis46(6)(2012), 1363–1387

work page 2012
[8]

Bonnet-Ben Dhia, L

A.-S. Bonnet-Ben Dhia, L. Chesnel, X. Claeys :Radiation Condition for a Non-Smooth Interface be- tween a Dielectric and a Metamaterial. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 23(9) (2013), 1629–1662

work page 2013
[9]

Bonnet-Ben Dhia, L

A.-S. Bonnet-Ben Dhia, L. Chesnel, P. Ciarlet Jr. :T-coercivity for the Maxwell Problem with Sign- Changing Coefficients. Communications in Partial Differential Equations 39(6) (2014), 1007–1031

work page 2014
[10]

Bonnet-Ben Dhia, L

A.-S. Bonnet-Ben Dhia, L. Chesnel, P. Ciarlet Jr. :Two-Dimensional Maxwell’s Equations with Sign- Changing Coefficients. Applied Numerical Mathematics 79 (2014), 29–41

work page 2014
[11]

PhD Thesis, Universidad de Buenos Aires, 2017

J.P.Borthagaray:Laplacianofraccionario: regularidaddesolucionesyaproximacionesporelementos finitos. PhD Thesis, Universidad de Buenos Aires, 2017

work page 2017
[12]

J.P.Borthagaray,P.CiarletJr.:NonlocalModelsforInterfaceProblemsbetweenDielectricsandMeta- materials.In:11thInternationalCongressonEngineeredMaterialPlatformsforNovelWavePhenom- ena (Metamaterials), 2017, 61–63. 42

work page 2017
[13]

Borthagaray, P

J.P. Borthagaray, P. Ciarlet Jr. :On the Convergence inH1-Norm for the Fractional Laplacian. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 57(4) (2019), 1723–1743

work page 2019
[14]

Borthagaray, P

J.P. Borthagaray, P. Ciarlet Jr. :On Some Coupled Local and Nonlocal Diffusion Models. arXiv:2505.19765, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[15]

J.P.Borthagaray,W.Li,R.H.Nochetto:FractionalEllipticProblemsonLipschitzDomains: Regularity and Approximation. In: T. Mengesha, A. J. Salgado (eds),A3N2M: Approximation, Applications, and Analysis of Nonlocal, Nonlinear Models, The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications 165, Springer, Cham, 2023, 27–99

work page 2023
[16]

Bourgain, H

J. Bourgain, H. Brezis, P. Mironescu :Another Look at Sobolev Spaces. In: J. L. Menaldi, E. Rofman, A.Sulem(eds.),Optimal Control and Partial Differential Equations,439–455,IOSPress,Amsterdam, 2001

work page 2001
[17]

C.Bucur,E.Valdinoci:NonlocalDiffusionandApplications.LectureNotesoftheUnioneMatematica Italiana 20, Springer, Cham, 2016

work page 2016
[18]

Bungert, F

L. Bungert, F. del Teso :Convergence Rates of the Fractional to the Local Dirichlet Problem. arXiv:2408.03299, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[19]

Ciarlet :The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems

P.G. Ciarlet :The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems. Studies in Mathematics and its Appli- cations 4, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978

work page 1978
[20]

Daoud, E.-H

M. Daoud, E.-H. Laamri :Fractional Laplacians : A short survey.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.-S 15(1) (2022), 95–116

work page 2022
[21]

Daoud, E.-H

M. Daoud, E.-H. Laamri, A. Baalal :A class of fractional parabolic reaction–diffusion systems with control of total mass: theory and numerics. Journal of Pseudo-Differential Operators and Applications 15(18) (2024)

work page 2024
[22]

D’Elia, Q

M. D’Elia, Q. Du, C. Glusa, M. Gunzburger, X. Tian, Z. Zhou :Numerical Methods for Nonlocal and Fractional Models. Acta Numerica 29 (2020), 1–124

work page 2020
[23]

E.DiNezza,G.Palatucci,E.Valdinoci:Hitchhiker’sGuidetotheFractionalSobolevSpaces.Bulletin des Sciences Mathématiques 136(5) (2012), 521–573

work page 2012
[24]

B.Dyda:AFractionalOrderHardyInequality.IllinoisJournalofMathematics48(2)(2004),575–588

work page 2004
[25]

Grisvard :Elliptic Problems in Nonsmooth Domains

P. Grisvard :Elliptic Problems in Nonsmooth Domains. Monographs and Studies in Mathematics 24, Pitman Advanced Publishing Program, Boston, MA, 1985

work page 1985
[26]

Leoni :A First Course in Fractional Sobolev Spaces

G. Leoni :A First Course in Fractional Sobolev Spaces. Graduate Studies in Mathematics 229, Amer- ican Mathematical Society, 2023

work page 2023
[27]

Lischke, G

A. Lischke, G. Pang, M. Gulian, F. Song, C. Glusa, X. Zheng, Z. Mao, W. Cai, M.M. Meerschaert, M. Ainsworth,G.E.Karniadakis,WhatistheFractionalLaplacian?JournalofComputationalPhysics404 (2020), 109009. 43

work page 2020
[28]

Maz’ya, T

V. Maz’ya, T. Shaposhnikova :On the Bourgain, Brezis, and Mironescu Theorem Concerning Limiting Embeddings of Fractional Sobolev Spaces. Journal of Functional Analysis 195 (2002), 230–238

work page 2002
[29]

Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Vol

G.MolicaBisci,V.D.Radulescu,R.Servadei:Variational Methods for Nonlocal Fractional Problems. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Vol. 162, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016

work page 2016
[30]

Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 101 (2014), 275–302

X.Ros-Oton,J.Serra:TheDirichletProblemfortheFractionalLaplacian: RegularityuptotheBound- ary. Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 101 (2014), 275–302

work page 2014
[31]

Servadei, E

R. Servadei, E. Valdinoci :Weak and Viscosity Solutions of the Fractional Laplace Equation. Publica- cions Matemàtiques 58 (2014), 133–154. 44 8 Appendix : Computations of the elements ofAold ThisappendixisdevotedtotheexplicitcomputationoftheentriesofA old (seeSubsection3.1). Webegin by recalling the notation used in the derivations below. — Some notation...

work page 2014