pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.09959 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Vapor-liquid-solid growth of unconventional nanowires

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords vapor liquid solid growthnanowire synthesisoxidescarbideschalcogenidesprecursor deliveryseed particlesnucleation pathways
0
0 comments X

The pith

Vapor-liquid-solid growth achieves less deterministic control for oxide, carbide, and chalcogenide nanowires than for conventional semiconductors due to differences in precursor and seed behavior.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper surveys the literature on VLS synthesis of non-conventional nanowires including oxides, carbides, and chalcogenides. It compares these to the well-developed control in group IV and III-V systems across the steps of precursor delivery, seed particle formation, and nucleation and growth. The authors point to specific mechanistic factors like precursor chemistry constraints and competing nucleation pathways as reasons for the slower progress. A reader cares because these nanowires are predicted to have useful properties for applications if synthesis can be mastered. The work aims to facilitate transfer of knowledge between material systems to improve overall nanowire synthesis.

Core claim

VLS growth provides substantial control over morphology, crystal phase, and modulation in conventional group IV and III-V nanowires, but comparable control is lacking in non-conventional classes despite their potential. The lag stems from constraints in precursor's chemistry and delivery, seed particle composition and dynamics, and competing non-catalytic nucleation and growth pathways. By categorizing the literature accordingly, the review highlights similarities and differences and outlines challenges and opportunities for more deterministic synthesis.

What carries the argument

Categorization of VLS nanowire growth into the sequential stages of precursor delivery, seed particle formation, and nucleation and growth to identify material-specific challenges.

If this is right

  • Insights from conventional nanowires can inform synthesis strategies for non-conventional ones.
  • Addressing precursor chemistry and delivery can reduce limitations in oxide and chalcogenide growth.
  • Managing seed particle dynamics and non-catalytic pathways enables better structural control.
  • Cross-system knowledge transfer paves the way for integration of complex one-dimensional nanomaterials.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the analysis holds, targeted experiments adjusting precursor types in carbide systems could achieve better control.
  • The framework may apply to other nanowire growth techniques beyond VLS.
  • Achieving control could enable new functional devices in electronics and sensing based on these materials.

Load-bearing premise

The primary reasons for the lag in synthesis development are the constraints from precursor chemistry, seed particle behavior, and competing nucleation pathways, as identified from the existing literature.

What would settle it

If researchers develop a method for growing oxide nanowires with precise control over diameter and crystal structure using unmodified conventional VLS precursors and seeds, that would indicate other factors are at play and challenge the explanation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09959 by Arindom Nag, Thang Pham.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Challenges and opportunities in vapor-liquid-solid growth of non-conventional nanowires: lessons from conventional (Si, Ge and GaAs) nanowires [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Precursors in VLS synthesis. (a-b) Physical methods of supplying atomic precursors: (a) carbothermic reduction of metals (semiconductors) and their oxides. (b) Salt-assisted metal precursor evaporation. (c) Molecular precursors. For conventional nanowires, as we defined here as group IV and III-V systems, such as Si, Ge, GaAs, InAs, GaN, both precursor delivery routes have been extensively explored, with p… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Seed particles in VLS synthesis. (a) Precursor fluxes transport to and diffuse within the seed droplet leading to different nucleation sites [44]. (b) Droplet instability, including metal diffusion to the nanowire sidewall, competing VSS nucleation and growth, and droplet roll-off leading to changes in growth directions (i.e., kink nanowires) [4,44]. (c-d) Droplet dynamics and its effects on the nucleation… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: VLS-grown nanowires. (a) Schematics showing the telltale VLS-grown nanowire structure: a hemisphere particle sitting atop square-cross-section wire. (b-d) Au-seeded oxide nanowires [23]. (e) Fe-seeded SiC nanowire [31]. (C) Au-seeded Bi2Te3 nanoribbons [33]. (Inset) An electron diffraction showing the hexagonal structure of Bi2Te3 (top) and a SEM image of the nanoribbon (bottom). (f) Ag-seeded GaS nanowire… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Growth Mechanism. (a) VLS growth modes in Au-seeded GaAs nanowire system by in situ TEM [6]. The crystal is nucleated at the droplet-nanowire interface following two pathways, depending on the geometry of the seed particle droplet, which result in two distinct crystal phases: zincblende (Left) and wurtzite (Right). (b) Electron irradiation induced growth of Al2O3 nanowire by self-seed particle [92]. The fo… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Vapor liquid solid (VLS) growth is one of the most widely used routes for nanowire synthesis. For conventional semiconductor nanowires, here we refer to group IV and III-V systems, decades of work have established VLS growth across diverse vapor-phase methods and enabled substantial control over morphology, crystal phase, and structural modulation. In contrast, comparable deterministic control has not yet been achieved for many non-conventional nanowire classes, including oxides, carbides, and chalcogenides, despite their predicted functional properties and broad application potential. Here we survey and categorize the literature on VLS and VLS-related synthesis of these non-conventional nanowires, highlighting key similarities and differences relative to the group IV and III-V baseline. We analyze mechanistic and potential factors that underlie the lag in synthesis development, including constraints associated with precursor's chemistry and delivery, seed particle composition and dynamics, and competing non-catalytic nucleation and growth pathways. The review is grouped into three main sections, according to the order in which each step takes place during a nanowire growth process, namely precursor delivery, seed particle formation, and nucleation and growth. Each section starts with a brief discussion of what has been achieved in group IV and III-V nanowires as a baseline, followed by similar as well as unique aspects in other material classes. Each section concludes with challenges and opportunities, where we discuss how insights developed in one nanowire system can inform progress in others, ultimately paving the way for more deterministic synthesis and integration of complex one-dimensional nanomaterials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a literature review surveying VLS and VLS-related synthesis of unconventional nanowires (oxides, carbides, chalcogenides) and contrasting it with the established control achieved for group IV and III-V systems. It organizes the discussion into three stages—precursor delivery, seed particle formation, and nucleation/growth—analyzing mechanistic factors such as precursor chemistry, seed dynamics, and competing nucleation pathways, while identifying challenges and opportunities for more deterministic control.

Significance. If the survey is representative, the review offers a useful framework for transferring insights across nanowire classes and could accelerate progress toward controlled synthesis of materials with predicted functional properties. The explicit baseline comparisons and stage-wise structure are strengths that help identify transferable strategies from conventional systems.

major comments (2)
  1. Precursor delivery section: the claim that precursor chemistry and delivery are primary constraints for oxides and chalcogenides is presented without quantitative metrics (e.g., vapor pressure ranges, supersaturation ratios, or growth rate comparisons) drawn from the cited works, leaving the relative weight of this factor versus seed dynamics unclear.
  2. Seed particle formation section: while the paper notes differences in seed composition and dynamics relative to Au-catalyzed group IV/III-V growth, it does not include a tabulated summary of reported seed materials, sizes, or stability data across the surveyed unconventional systems, which would strengthen the mechanistic analysis.
minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that 'comparable deterministic control has not yet been achieved' but does not define quantitative criteria for 'deterministic control' (e.g., diameter uniformity, phase purity, or yield thresholds); adding a brief operational definition would improve clarity.
  2. Literature selection criteria are not explicitly stated; a short methods paragraph describing search terms, databases, and inclusion/exclusion rules would help readers assess completeness.
  3. Figure captions (if present) should explicitly link each panel to the corresponding stage (precursor, seed, or nucleation) to aid navigation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and constructive comments on our literature review. The suggestions to strengthen quantitative support and add a summary table are well-taken and will improve clarity. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Precursor delivery section: the claim that precursor chemistry and delivery are primary constraints for oxides and chalcogenides is presented without quantitative metrics (e.g., vapor pressure ranges, supersaturation ratios, or growth rate comparisons) drawn from the cited works, leaving the relative weight of this factor versus seed dynamics unclear.

    Authors: We agree that adding quantitative metrics would better substantiate the claims and clarify relative importance. In the revised manuscript we will incorporate representative data from the cited literature, including vapor pressure ranges for oxide and chalcogenide precursors, example supersaturation values, and growth-rate comparisons where reported. These additions will help distinguish precursor-delivery constraints from seed-dynamics effects, while noting that comprehensive quantitative datasets remain limited across the surveyed systems. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Seed particle formation section: while the paper notes differences in seed composition and dynamics relative to Au-catalyzed group IV/III-V growth, it does not include a tabulated summary of reported seed materials, sizes, or stability data across the surveyed unconventional systems, which would strengthen the mechanistic analysis.

    Authors: We appreciate this recommendation. A tabulated overview will improve readability and facilitate comparisons. In the revision we will insert a table summarizing reported seed materials, typical sizes, and stability observations for the unconventional nanowire systems, drawn from the cited works, with direct side-by-side reference to the group IV/III-V baseline discussed in the section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; literature review with no derivation chain

full rationale

The manuscript is a literature review surveying VLS growth for oxides, carbides, and chalcogenides, contrasting it with group IV/III-V baselines and organizing discussion around precursor delivery, seed dynamics, and nucleation. No original equations, quantitative derivations, fitted parameters, or predictions are introduced that could reduce to inputs by construction. All observations and challenges are drawn from external cited literature rather than self-referential steps, self-citations bearing the central claim, or renamed known results. The main statement on lack of deterministic control is presented as the observed state of the field, not a derived result, making the paper self-contained against external benchmarks with no detectable circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a literature review, the paper introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it relies on established concepts from the nanowire synthesis literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5563 in / 1105 out tokens · 45263 ms · 2026-05-10T16:29:58.770985+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

126 extracted references · 126 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. S. Wagner and W. C. Ellis, Vapor -liquid-solid mechanism of single crystal growth, Applied Physics Letters 4, 89 (1964)

  2. [2]

    Wu and P

    Y. Wu and P. Yang, Direct observation of vapor-liquid-solid nanowire growth, Journal of the American Chemical Society 123, 3165 (2001)

  3. [3]

    Hofmann, R

    S. Hofmann, R. Sharma, C. T. Wirth, F. Cervantes-Sodi, C. Ducati, T. Kasama, R. E. Dunin- Borkowski, J. Drucker, P. Bennett, and J. Robertson, Ledge -flow-controlled catalyst interface dynamics during Si nanowire growth, Nature Materials 7, 372 (2008)

  4. [4]

    F. M. Ross, Controlling nanowire structures through real time growth studies, Reports on Progress in Physics 73, 114501 (2010)

  5. [5]

    Kodambaka, J

    S. Kodambaka, J. Tersoff, M. C. Reuter, and F. M. Ross, Germanium nanowire growth below the eutectic temperature, Science 316, 729 (2007)

  6. [6]

    Jacobsson, F

    D. Jacobsson, F. Panciera, J. Tersoff, M. C. Reuter, S. Lehmann, S. Hofmann, K. A. Dick, and F. M. Ross, Interface dynamics and crystal phase switching in GaAs nanowires, Nature 531, 317 (2016)

  7. [7]

    I. R. Musin and M. A. Filler, Chemical control of semiconductor nanowire kinking and superstructure, Nano Letters 12, 3363 (2012)

  8. [8]

    Panciera, Z

    F. Panciera, Z. Baraissov, G. Patriarche, V. G. Dubrovskii, F. Glas, L. Travers, U. Mirsaidov, and J. C. Harmand, Phase Selection in Self -catalyzed GaAs Nanowires, Nano Letters 20, 1669 (2020)

  9. [9]

    A. M. Morales and C. M. Lieber, A laser ablation method for the synthesis of crystalline semiconductor nanowires, Science 279, 208 (1998)

  10. [10]

    Schmidt, J

    V. Schmidt, J. V. Wittemann, and U. Gösele, Growth, thermodynamics, and electrical properties of silicon nanowires, Chemical Reviews 110, 361 (2010)

  11. [11]

    Duan and C

    X. Duan and C. M. Lieber, General synthesis of compound semiconductor nanowires, Advanced Materials 12, 298 (2000)

  12. [12]

    M. T. Björ, B. J. Ohlsson, T. Sass, A. I. Persson, C. Thelander, M. H. Magnusson, K. Deppert, L. R. Wallenberg, and L. Samuelson, One-dimensional Steeplechase for Electrons Realized, Nano Letters 2, 87 (2002)

  13. [13]

    Barrigón, M

    E. Barrigón, M. Heurlin, Z. Bi, B. Monemar, and L. Samuelson, Synthesis and Applications of III-V Nanowires, Chemical Reviews 119, 9170 (2019)

  14. [14]

    C. Jia, Z. Lin, Y. Huang, and X. Duan, Nanowire Electronics: From Nanoscale to Macroscale, Chemical Reviews 119, 9074 (2019)

  15. [15]

    Tian and C

    B. Tian and C. M. Lieber, Nanowired Bioelectric Interfaces, Chemical Reviews 119, 9136 (2019)

  16. [16]

    L. N. Quan, J. Kang, C. Z. Ning, and P. Yang, Nanowires for Photonics, Chemical Reviews 119, 9153 (2019)

  17. [17]

    J. Deng, Y. Su, D. Liu, P. Yang, B. Liu, and C. Liu, Nanowire Photoelectrochemistry, Chemical Reviews 119, 9221 (2019)

  18. [18]

    R. Chen, J. Lee, W. Lee, and D. Li, Thermoelectrics of Nanowires, Chemical Reviews 119, 9260 (2019)

  19. [19]

    C. Pan, J. Zhai, and Z. L. Wang, Piezotronics and Piezo -phototronics of Third Generation Semiconductor Nanowires, Chemical Reviews 119, 9303 (2019)

  20. [20]

    M. H. Huang, Y. Wu, H. Feick, N. Tran, E. Weber, and P. Yang, Catalytic Growth of Zinc Oxide Nanowires by Vapor Transport, Advanced Materials 13, 113 (2001). 25

  21. [21]

    Z. L. Wang, Zinc oxide nanostructures: Growth, properties and applications, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter 16, R829 (2004)

  22. [22]

    Nguyen, H

    P. Nguyen, H. T. Ng, and M. Meyyappan, Catalyst Metal Selection for Synthesis of Inorganic Nanowires, Advanced Materials 17, 1773 (2005)

  23. [23]

    Klamchuen et al., Rational Concept for Designing Vapor -Liquid-Solid Growth of Single Crystalline Metal Oxide Nanowires, Nano Letters 15, 6406 (2015)

    A. Klamchuen et al., Rational Concept for Designing Vapor -Liquid-Solid Growth of Single Crystalline Metal Oxide Nanowires, Nano Letters 15, 6406 (2015)

  24. [24]

    Z. R. Dai, Z. W. Pan, and Z. L. Wang, Novel nanostructures of functional oxides synthesized by thermal evaporation, Advanced Functional Materials 13, 9 (2003)

  25. [25]

    Ma and Y

    R. Ma and Y. Bando, Investigation on the growth of boron carbide nanowires, Chemistry of Materials 14, 4403 (2002)

  26. [26]

    H. J. Choi, H. K. Seong, J. C. Lee, and Y. M. Sung, Growth and modulation of silicon carbide nanowires, Journal of Crystal Growth 269, 472 (2004)

  27. [27]

    Johnsson and M

    M. Johnsson and M. Nygren, Carbothermal synthesis of TaC whiskers via a vapor -liquid- solid growth mechanism, Journal of Materials Research 12, 2419 (1997)

  28. [28]

    S. R. Qi, X. T. Huang, Z. W. Gan, X. X. Ding, and Y. Cheng, Synthesis of titanium carbide nanowires, Journal of Crystal Growth 219, 485 (2000)

  29. [29]

    D. N. McIlroy, D. Zhang, Y. Kranov, and M. G. Norton, Nanosprings, Applied Physics Letters 79, 1540 (2001)

  30. [30]

    Zhang, A

    D. Zhang, A. Alkhateeb, H. Han, H. Mahmood, D. N. McIlroy, and M. G. Norton, Silicon carbide nanosprings, Nano Letters 3, 983 (2003)

  31. [31]

    S. G. Sundaresan, A. V. Davydov, M. D. Vaudin, I. Levin, J. E. Maslar, Y. L. Tian, and M. V. Rao, Growth of Silicon Carbide Nanowires by a Microwave Heating -Assisted Physical Vapor Transport Process Using Group VIII Metal Catalysts , in Chemistry of Materials , Vol. 19 (American Chemical Society, 2007), pp. 5531–5537

  32. [32]

    D. Wang, C. Xue, H. Bai, and N. Jiang, Silicon carbide nanowires grown on graphene sheets, Ceramics International 41, 5473 (2015)

  33. [33]

    L. D. Alegria, N. Yao, and J. R. Petta, MOCVD synthesis of compositionally tuned topological insulator nanowires, Physica Status Solidi (RRL) - Rapid Research Letters 8, 991 (2014)

  34. [34]

    Y. Zou, Z. G. Chen, Y. Huang, L. Yang, J. Drennan, and J. Zou, Anisotropic electrical properties from vapor -solid-solid grown Bi2Se3 nanoribbons and nanowires, Journal of Physical Chemistry C 118, 20620 (2014)

  35. [35]

    L. D. Alegria, M. D. Schroer, A. Chatterjee, G. R. Poirier, M. Pretko, S. K. Patel, and J. R. Petta, Structural and electrical characterization of Bi 2Se 3 nanostructures grown by metal- organic chemical vapor deposition, Nano Letters 12, 4711 (2012)

  36. [36]

    L. D. Alegria and J. R. Petta, Controlled MOCVD growth of Bi 2Se 3 topological insulator nanoribbons, Nanotechnology 23, 435601 (2012)

  37. [37]

    H. Peng, K. Lai, D. Kong, S. Meister, Y. Chen, X. L. Qi, S. C. Zhang, Z. X. Shen, and Y. Cui, Aharonov-Bohm interference in topological insulator nanoribbons, Nature Materials 9, 225 (2010)

  38. [38]

    D. Kong, J. C. Randel, H. Peng, J. J. Cha, S. Meister, K. Lai, Y. Chen, Z. X. Shen, H. C. Manoharan, and Y. Cui, Topological insulator nanowires and nanoribbons, Nano Letters 10, 329 (2010)

  39. [39]

    D. Kong, W. Dang, J. J. Cha, H. Li, S. Meister, H. Peng, Z. Liu, and Y. Cui, Few -layer nanoplates of Bi2Se3 and Bi 2Te3 with highly tunable chemical potential, Nano Letters 10, 2245 (2010). 26

  40. [40]

    J. J. Cha, J. R. Williams, D. Kong, S. Meister, H. Peng, A. J. Bestwick, P. Gallagher, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, and Y. Cui, Magnetic doping and kondo effect in Bi2Se3 nanoribbons, Nano Letters 10, 1076 (2010)

  41. [41]

    Y. C. Chou, F. Panciera, M. C. Reuter, E. A. Stach, and F. M. Ross, Nanowire growth kinetics in aberration corrected environmental transmission electron microscopy, Chemical Communications 52, 5686 (2016)

  42. [42]

    J. C. Harmand, G. Patriarche, F. Glas, F. Panciera, I. Florea, J. L. Maurice, L. Travers, and Y. Ollivier, Atomic Step Flow on a Nanofacet, Physical Review Letters 121, 166101 (2018)

  43. [43]

    S. Han, C. Li, Z. Liu, B. Lei, D. Zhang, W. Jin, X. Liu, T. Tang, and C. Zhou, Transition metal oxide core-shell nanowires: Generic synthesis and transport studies, Nano Letters 4, 1241 (2004)

  44. [44]

    Ek and M

    M. Ek and M. A. Filler, Atomic -Scale Choreography of Vapor -Liquid-Solid Nanowire Growth, Accounts of Chemical Research 51, 118 (2018)

  45. [45]

    C. Y. Wen, M. C. Reuter, J. Bruley, J. Tersoff, S. Kodambaka, E. A. Stach, and F. M. Ross, Formation of compositionally abrupt axial heterojunctions in silicon-germanium nanowires, Science 326, 1247 (2009)

  46. [46]

    Y. C. Chou, C. Y. Wen, M. C. Reuter, D. Su, E. A. Stach, and F. M. Ross, Controlling the growth of Si/Ge nanowires and heterojunctions using silver-gold alloy catalysts, ACS Nano 6, 6407 (2012)

  47. [47]

    J. C. Bürger, S. Gutsch, and M. Zacharias, Extended View on the Vapor -Liquid-Solid Mechanism for Oxide Compound Nanowires: The Role of Oxygen, Solubility, and Carbothermal Reaction, Journal of Physical Chemistry C 122, 24407 (2018)

  48. [48]

    Nguyen, S

    P. Nguyen, S. Vaddiraju, and M. Meyyappan, Indium and Tin Oxide Nanowires by Vapor - Liquid-Solid Growth Technique , in Journal of Electronic Materials , Vol. 35 (Springer, 2006), pp. 200–206

  49. [49]

    Y. Shen, S. Turner, P. Yang, G. Van Tendeloo, O. I. Lebedev, and T. Wu, Epitaxy -enabled vapor-liquid-solid growth of tin-doped indium oxide nanowires with controlled orientations, Nano Letters 14, 4342 (2014)

  50. [50]

    G. Wang, J. Park, X. Kong, P. R. Wilson, Z. Chen, and J. H. Ahn, Facile synthesis and characterization of gallium oxide (β-Ga 2O3) 1D nanostructures: Nanowires, nanoribbons, and nanosheets, Crystal Growth and Design 8, 1940 (2008)

  51. [51]

    C. L. Kuo and M. H. Huang, The growth of ultralong and highly blue luminescent gallium oxide nanowires and nanobelts, and direct horizontal nanowire growth on substrates, Nanotechnology 19, 155604 (2008)

  52. [52]

    Wang and C

    L. Wang and C. Tu, Growth modulation of Ga2S3 horizontal nanowires and its optical properties, Nanotechnology 31, 165603 (2020)

  53. [53]

    Sutter, J

    E. Sutter, J. S. French, S. Sutter, J. C. Idrobo, and P. Sutter, Vapor-Liquid-Solid Growth and Optoelectronics of Gallium Sulfide van der Waals Nanowires, ACS Nano 14, 6117 (2020)

  54. [54]

    H. Peng, S. Meister, C. K. Chan, X. F. Zhang, and Y. Cui, Morphology Control of Layer - Structured Gallium Selenide Nanowires, NANO LETTERS 7, 199 (2007)

  55. [55]

    Sutter and P

    E. Sutter and P. Sutter, 1D Wires of 2D Layered Materials: Germanium Sulfide Nanowires as Efficient Light Emitters, ACS Applied Nano Materials 1, 1042 (2018)

  56. [56]

    Liu et al., Helical van der Waals crystals with discretized Eshelby twist, Nature 570, 358 (2019)

    Y. Liu et al., Helical van der Waals crystals with discretized Eshelby twist, Nature 570, 358 (2019). 27

  57. [57]

    H. Peng, D. T. Schoen, S. Meister, X. F. Zhang, and Y. Cui, Synthesis and phase transformation of In2Se3 and CuInSe2 nanowires, Journal of the American Chemical Society 129, 34 (2007)

  58. [58]

    T. Pham, K. Reidy, J. D. Thomsen, B. Wang, N. Deshmukh, M. A. Filler, and F. M. Ross, Salt-Assisted Vapor –Liquid–Solid Growth of 1D van der Waals Materials, Advanced Materials 2309360 (2024)

  59. [59]

    D. N. McIlroy, D. Zhang, Y. Kranov, H. Han, A. Alkhateeb, and M. G. Norton, The Effects of Crystallinity and Catalyst Dynamics on Boron Carbide Nanospring Formation , in Materials Research Society Symposium - Proceedings, Vol. 739 (Materials Research Society, 2002), pp. 165–173

  60. [60]

    Meng et al., A flux induced crystal phase transition in the vapor -liquid-solid growth of indium-tin oxide nanowires, Nanoscale 6, 7033 (2014)

    G. Meng et al., A flux induced crystal phase transition in the vapor -liquid-solid growth of indium-tin oxide nanowires, Nanoscale 6, 7033 (2014)

  61. [61]

    G. Meng et al., Impact of preferential indium nucleation on electrical conductivity of vapor- liquid-solid grown indium-tin oxide nanowires, Journal of the American Chemical Society 135, 7033 (2013)

  62. [62]

    B. Lei, C. Li, D. Zhang, S. Han, and C. Zhou, Efficient synthesis and electronic studies of core-shell nanowires based on colossal magnetoresistive manganites, Journal of Physical Chemistry B 109, 18799 (2005)

  63. [63]

    H. J. Fan, Y. Yang, and M. Zacharias, ZnO -based ternary compound nanotubes and nanowires, Journal of Materials Chemistry 19, 885 (2009)

  64. [64]

    Suzuki, Y

    M. Suzuki, Y. Hidaka, T. Yanagida, A. Klamchuen, M. Kanai, T. Kawai, and S. Kai, Essential role of catalyst in vapor-liquid-solid growth of compounds, Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 83, 061606 (2011)

  65. [65]

    V. G. Dubrovskii, Nucleation Theory and Growth of Nanostructures (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014)

  66. [66]

    Z. L. Wang, ACS Nano 2, 1987 (2008)

  67. [67]

    Panciera, J

    F. Panciera, J. Tersoff, A. D. Gamalski, M. C. Reuter, D. Zakharov, E. A. Stach, S. Hofmann, and F. M. Ross, Surface Crystallization of Liquid Au -Si and Its Impact on Catalysis, Advanced Materials 31, 1806544 (2019)

  68. [68]

    Panciera, M

    F. Panciera, M. M. Norton, S. B. Alam, S. Hofmann, K. Mølhave, and F. M. Ross, Controlling nanowire growth through electric field-induced deformation of the catalyst droplet, Nature Communications 7, 1 (2016)

  69. [69]

    Zhu, T.-L

    Z. Zhu, T.-L. Chen, Y. Gu, J. Warren, and R. M. Osgood, Zinc Oxide Nanowires Grown by Vapor-Phase Transport Using Selected Metal Catalysts: A Comparative Study, (2005)

  70. [70]

    F. M. Ross, J. Tersoff, and M. C. Reuter, Sawtooth faceting in silicon nanowires, Physical Review Letters 95, 146104 (2005)

  71. [71]

    J. E. Allen et al., High -resolution detection of Au catalyst atoms in Si nanowires, Nature Nanotechnology 3, 168 (2008)

  72. [72]

    M. M. Brewster, X. Zhou, S. K. Lim, and S. Gradečak, Role of Au in the growth and nanoscale optical properties of ZnO nanowires, Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2, 586 (2011)

  73. [73]

    Z. W. Pan, S. Dai, C. M. Rouleau, and D. H. Lowndes, Germanium -Catalyzed Growth of Zinc Oxide Nanowires: A Semiconductor Catalyst for Nanowire Synthesis, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 44, 274 (2005). 28

  74. [74]

    T. Pham, S. Kommandur, H. Lee, D. Zakharov, M. A. Filler, and F. M. Ross, One - dimensional twisted and tubular structures of zinc oxide by semiconductor-catalyzed vapor– liquid–solid synthesis, Nanotechnology 32, 075603 (2020)

  75. [75]

    Z. Gu, F. Liu, J. Y. Howe, M. P. Paranthaman, and Z. Pan, Three -dimensional germanium oxide nanowire networks, Crystal Growth and Design 9, 35 (2009)

  76. [76]

    S. S. Kim, S. W. Choi, C. Lee, J. C. Yang, H. G. Na, D. S. Kwak, and H. W. Kim, Temperature-induced evolution of novel mixture -phased particles at the tips of SnO 2 whiskers, Chemical Engineering Journal 179, 381 (2012)

  77. [77]

    Z. Gu, F. Liu, J. Y. Howe, M. Parans Paranthaman, and Z. Pan, Germanium -catalyzed hierarchical Al2O3 and SiO 2 nanowire bunch arrays, Nanoscale 1, 347 (2009)

  78. [78]

    C. Xie, P. Yang, Y. Huan, F. Cui, and Y. Zhang, Roles of salts in the chemical vapor deposition synthesis of two -dimensional transition metal chalcogenides, Dalton Transactions 49, 10319 (2020)

  79. [79]

    Sheng, B

    T. Sheng, B. Cao, Y. Zhang, and H. Zhang, New growth modes of molybdenum oxide layered 1D structures using alternative catalysts: Transverse mode vs. axial mode, CrystEngComm 17, 1139 (2015)

  80. [80]

    H. Qi, C. Wang, and J. Liu, A Simple Method for the Synthesis of Highly Oriented Potassium-Doped Tungsten Oxide Nanowires, Advanced Materials 15, 411 (2003)

Showing first 80 references.