arxiv: 2604.09990 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-11 · 💻 cs.CV

Recognition: unknown

Gait Recognition with Temporal Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks

Mohammed Asad , Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV

keywords gait recognitionKolmogorov-Arnold networkstemporal modelingsilhouette biometricslearnable functionsdual memoryview-invariant recognitionCNN architectures

0 comments

The pith

Temporal Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks replace fixed weights with learnable functions and add dual memory to model walking patterns for person identification.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes TKAN to improve gait recognition from silhouette sequences by addressing the information loss in recurrent models and the high resource demands of transformers. It replaces standard fixed connection weights with adjustable one-dimensional functions and introduces a two-level memory system of short-term sublayers plus a gated long-term pathway. This structure targets the joint capture of repeating step cycles and longer motion trends while keeping the overall model compact. The design seeks greater robustness when clothing, carried objects, or camera angles vary. Reported tests on the CASIA-B dataset show competitive recognition rates under those conditions.

Core claim

The paper claims that the Temporal Kolmogorov-Arnold Network framework, by substituting fixed edge weights with learnable one-dimensional functions and combining short-term RKAN sublayers with a gated long-term pathway, enables efficient temporal modeling of gait sequences that preserves both local cycle details and extended context without the sequential optimization problems of recurrent networks or the data and compute costs of transformers.

What carries the argument

Temporal Kolmogorov-Arnold Network (TKAN), a neural layer architecture that replaces fixed connection weights with learnable one-dimensional functions and integrates short-term RKAN sublayers with a gated long-term memory pathway to jointly model local gait cycles and broader motion trends.

If this is right

Joint modeling of local gait cycles and longer-term motion trends becomes feasible inside a compact backbone.
Robustness to clothing, carrying, and view variations improves in silhouette-based sequences.
Processing of long or noisy gait sequences avoids the forgetting issues of recurrent networks and the scaling problems of transformers.
Recognition performance reaches competitive levels on CASIA-B without demanding larger training sets or greater computational resources.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same learnable-function replacement could apply to other video sequence tasks that need balanced short and long temporal dependencies.
Dual memory levels might serve as a lighter alternative to attention mechanisms in general action or motion recognition pipelines.
Testing the architecture on outdoor surveillance sequences with uncontrolled lighting and occlusions would reveal how far the cycle-plus-context modeling extends beyond controlled lab data.

Load-bearing premise

That learnable one-dimensional functions combined with short-term sublayers and a gated long-term pathway will capture both fine cycle-level dynamics and extended temporal context more effectively and compactly than recurrent or transformer alternatives while staying robust to appearance changes.

What would settle it

A side-by-side evaluation on the CASIA-B dataset in which the CNN+TKAN model fails to match or exceed the recognition accuracy of standard recurrent or transformer-based gait systems across normal, clothing, carrying, and multi-view test conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09990 by Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma, Mohammed Asad.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Architecture of CNN model rt = Concat[o˜1,t, . . . , o˜M,t]. The long-term gated pathway then uses rt to control the output gate: ft = σ(Wfxt + Ufht−1 + bf ), it = σ(Wixt + Uiht−1 + bi), (9) c˜t = tanh(Wcxt + Ucht−1 + bc), ot = σ(Wort + bo), (10) ct = ft ⊙ ct−1 + it ⊙ c˜t , ht = ot ⊙ tanh(ct). (11) Thus TKAN fuses fast, functionparameterized RKAN responses with a slow, gated memory that preserves longer c… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Training/validation loss and accuracy for CNN+TKAN on CASIA–B (subject split 1–74 train, 75–124 test). as shown in figure 3. Additional sweeps around the default configuration, with learning rates in the range [5 × 10−5 , 2 × 10−4 ] and dropout values in [0.2, 0.4], produce similar performance trends; the selected setting of learning rate 10−4 and dropout 0.3 consistently yields the best validation and te… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: ROC and AUC for CNN+TKAN on CASIA–B, showing both micro- and macro-averaged [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Gait recognition is a biometric modality that identifies individuals from their characteristic walking patterns. Unlike conventional biometric traits, gait can be acquired at a distance and without active subject cooperation, making it suitable for surveillance and public safety applications. Nevertheless, silhouette-based temporal models remain sensitive to long sequences, observation noise, and appearance-related covariates. Recurrent architectures often struggle to preserve information from earlier frames and are inherently sequential to optimize, whereas transformer-based models typically require greater computational resources and larger training sets and may be sensitive to irregular sequence lengths and noisy inputs. These limitations reduce robustness under clothing variation, carrying conditions, and view changes, while also hindering the joint modeling of local gait cycles and longer-term motion trends. To address these challenges, we introduce a Temporal Kolmogorov-Arnold Network (TKAN) for gait recognition. The proposed model replaces fixed edge weights with learnable one-dimensional functions and incorporates a two-level memory mechanism consisting of short-term RKAN sublayers and a gated long-term pathway. This design enables efficient modeling of both cycle-level dynamics and broader temporal context while maintaining a compact backbone. Experiments on the CASIA-B dataset indicate that the proposed CNN+TKAN framework achieves strong recognition performance under the reported evaluation setting.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper introduces a Temporal KAN with short-term RKAN sublayers and gated long-term memory for gait sequences, but the abstract asserts strong CASIA-B results without any numbers, baselines, or protocol details.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this work extends Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks into a temporal setting for gait recognition by swapping fixed edge weights for learnable one-dimensional functions and adding a two-level memory structure: short-term RKAN sublayers plus a gated long-term pathway. That combination is presented as new for handling both local cycle dynamics and longer motion context in silhouette sequences. The authors correctly flag real weaknesses in standard RNNs (information loss over long inputs) and transformers (compute cost and sensitivity to noise or irregular lengths), and they position the TKAN as a more compact alternative that could stay robust to clothing, carrying, and view changes. That framing is clear and directly tied to the application constraints. The design itself looks like a straightforward adaptation of KAN ideas to sequences, with the gated pathway as the main addition for longer-term modeling. The soft spot is the complete absence of evidence. The abstract claims the CNN+TKAN framework achieves strong recognition performance on CASIA-B under the reported setting, yet supplies no accuracy values, no comparisons to prior methods, no error bars, no split details, and no ablation results isolating the memory components. Without those, it is impossible to check whether the learnable functions and two-level memory actually deliver the promised joint modeling or robustness gains. The stress-test note is accurate on this point. If the full paper contains tables and implementation specifics, that would change the picture, but the provided text leaves the central claim as an unsupported assertion. This is mainly for people already working on gait biometrics or KAN extensions for time series. A reader focused on architecture ideas might extract the high-level design, but the lack of results limits its immediate value. I would not bring it to a reading group or cite it until the numbers appear. It does not yet deserve peer review because the evidence needed to evaluate the claims is missing.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a CNN+TKAN architecture for silhouette-based gait recognition. TKAN replaces fixed edge weights with learnable one-dimensional functions and adds a two-level memory mechanism (short-term RKAN sublayers plus gated long-term pathway) intended to jointly capture cycle-level dynamics and longer temporal context while remaining compact. The central claim is that this design yields strong recognition performance on the CASIA-B dataset under the reported evaluation setting, addressing limitations of RNNs and transformers with respect to sequence length, noise, and covariates such as clothing, carrying, and viewpoint.

Significance. If the performance claims are substantiated with quantitative results, the work would introduce a Kolmogorov-Arnold-inspired temporal module that offers a parameter-efficient alternative to recurrent and attention-based models for gait sequences. This could improve robustness to appearance covariates while preserving modeling of both local periodicity and extended motion trends, which is relevant for surveillance applications.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the CNN+TKAN framework 'achieves strong recognition performance' is unsupported by any numerical accuracy values, baseline comparisons, error bars, dataset splits, or covariate-specific results. Without these, it is impossible to evaluate whether the learnable 1D functions and two-level memory mechanism deliver the claimed joint modeling of cycle dynamics and longer context or improve robustness over prior methods.
[Abstract] The central claim that the two-level memory (short-term RKAN sublayers + gated long-term pathway) enables efficient modeling of both local gait cycles and broader temporal context while remaining robust to clothing/carrying/view changes is load-bearing, yet no ablation studies isolating the contribution of the gated long-term pathway or the learnable functions versus a standard KAN or RNN baseline are referenced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive suggestions. We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including concrete numerical results and references to supporting analyses from the main text. We will revise the abstract accordingly in the next version. Our point-by-point responses to the major comments are provided below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the CNN+TKAN framework 'achieves strong recognition performance' is unsupported by any numerical accuracy values, baseline comparisons, error bars, dataset splits, or covariate-specific results. Without these, it is impossible to evaluate whether the learnable 1D functions and two-level memory mechanism deliver the claimed joint modeling of cycle dynamics and longer context or improve robustness over prior methods.

Authors: We acknowledge that the current abstract is too high-level and does not cite specific metrics. The full manuscript (Section 4) reports rank-1 accuracies on CASIA-B under the standard protocol, with results broken down by normal, bag, and coat conditions, direct comparisons to CNN+RNN and CNN+Transformer baselines, and standard deviations across multiple runs. We will revise the abstract to include the key quantitative figures (e.g., overall accuracy and relative gains) and a brief statement of the evaluation setting so that readers can immediately assess the performance claims. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] The central claim that the two-level memory (short-term RKAN sublayers + gated long-term pathway) enables efficient modeling of both local gait cycles and broader temporal context while remaining robust to clothing/carrying/view changes is load-bearing, yet no ablation studies isolating the contribution of the gated long-term pathway or the learnable functions versus a standard KAN or RNN baseline are referenced.

Authors: The manuscript contains ablation studies (Section 4.3) that isolate the effects of the learnable 1D functions, the short-term RKAN sublayers, and the gated long-term pathway, including direct comparisons against a standard KAN and an RNN baseline. These experiments quantify the contribution of each component to robustness under covariates. The abstract does not currently reference these results. We will add a concise sentence summarizing the ablation findings to support the central claim about the two-level memory mechanism. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected in TKAN model proposal or claims

full rationale

The paper introduces TKAN as an original architecture that replaces fixed edge weights with learnable 1D functions and adds a two-level memory (short-term RKAN + gated long-term pathway). No equations, derivations, or self-citations are shown that reduce any claimed result to a quantity defined by the model's own fitted parameters or prior self-work. The CASIA-B performance statement is framed as an empirical outcome under a reported setting, not as a prediction forced by construction from inputs. The central design choices remain independent of the target recognition metric, satisfying the self-contained criterion.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the unproven effectiveness of the newly introduced TKAN components for gait dynamics; no first-principles derivation or external benchmarks are supplied in the abstract.

free parameters (1)

parameters of the learnable one-dimensional functions
These functions replace fixed weights and are optimized during training, but no count or initialization details are given.

axioms (1)

standard math Kolmogorov-Arnold representation theorem permits decomposition of multivariate functions into sums and compositions of univariate functions
This is the mathematical foundation invoked for replacing MLP weights with learnable univariate functions.

invented entities (1)

Temporal Kolmogorov-Arnold Network (TKAN) with two-level memory no independent evidence
purpose: To jointly capture local gait cycles via short-term RKAN and longer motion trends via gated pathway
Newly defined architecture whose benefits are asserted without independent falsifiable evidence outside the paper.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5507 in / 1414 out tokens · 76532 ms · 2026-05-10T16:30:34.169434+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

GaitPart: Temporal Part-based Model for Gait Recognition,

C. Fan, Y. Peng, C. Cao, X. Liu, S. Hou, J. Chi, Y. Huang, Q. Li, and Z. He, “GaitPart: Temporal Part-based Model for Gait Recognition,” inProc. CVPR, 2020, pp. 14225–14233

2020
[2]

Context-SensitiveTemporalFeatureLearn- ing for Gait Recognition,

X. Huang, D. Zhu, H. Wang, and X. Wang, “Context-SensitiveTemporalFeatureLearn- ing for Gait Recognition,” inProc. ICCV, 2021, pp. 12913–12922

2021
[3]

Gait Recog- nition via Effective Global-Local Feature Representation and Local Temporal Aggre- gation,

B. Lin, S. Zhang, and X. Yu, “Gait Recog- nition via Effective Global-Local Feature Representation and Local Temporal Aggre- gation,” inProc. ICCV, 2021, pp. 14648– 14657

2021
[4]

3D Local Con- volutional Neural Networks for Gait Recog- nition,

Z. Huang, D. Xue, X. Shen, X. Tian, H. Li, J. Huang, and X.-S. Hua, “3D Local Con- volutional Neural Networks for Gait Recog- nition,” inProc. ICCV, 2021, pp. 14920– 14929

2021
[5]

GaitGraph: Graph Convolutional Network for Skeleton- Based Gait Recognition,

T. Teepe, A. Khan, J. Gilg, F. Herzog, S. Hörmann, and G. Rigoll, “GaitGraph: Graph Convolutional Network for Skeleton- Based Gait Recognition,” inProc. ICIP, 2021, pp. 2314–2318. 8

2021
[6]

Gait Recogni- tion Based on Gait Optical Flow Network with Inherent Feature Pyramid,

H. Ye, T. Sun, and K. Xu, “Gait Recogni- tion Based on Gait Optical Flow Network with Inherent Feature Pyramid,”Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 19, p. 10975, 2023

2023
[7]

A Comprehensive Sur- vey on Deep Gait Recognition: Al- gorithms, Datasets, and Challenges,

C. Shen, S. Yu, J. Wang, G. Q. Huang, and L. Wang, “A Comprehensive Sur- vey on Deep Gait Recognition: Al- gorithms, Datasets, and Challenges,” arXiv:2206.13732, 2022

work page arXiv 2022
[8]

Emerging Trends in Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Survey,

V. Munusamy, C. Shah, D. Ahirrao, R. Maitri, and N. Koradia, “Emerging Trends in Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Survey,”Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2024

2024
[9]

A Framework for Evaluating the Effect of View Angle, Clothing and Carrying Condition on Gait Recognition,

S. Yu, D. Tan, and T. Tan, “A Framework for Evaluating the Effect of View Angle, Clothing and Carrying Condition on Gait Recognition,” inProc. ICPR, 2006, pp. 441– 444

2006
[10]

KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks

Z. Liu, Y. Wang, S. Vaidya, F. Ruehle, J. Halverson, M. Soljačić, T. Y. Hou, and M. Tegmark, “KAN: Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks,” arXiv:2404.19756, 2024

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024
[11]

Genet and M

R. Genet and H. Inzirillo, “TKAN: Temporal Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks,” arXiv:2405.07344, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[12]

Learning Visual Prompt for Gait Recognition (VPNet),

K. Maet al., “Learning Visual Prompt for Gait Recognition (VPNet),” inProc. CVPR, 2024

2024
[13]

Causality-inspired Dis- criminative Feature Learning in Triple Do- mains for Gait Recognition (CLTD),

H. Xionget al., “Causality-inspired Dis- criminative Feature Learning in Triple Do- mains for Gait Recognition (CLTD),” in Proc. ECCV, 2024. (also arXiv:2407.12519)

work page arXiv 2024
[14]

Hierarchical Spatio- Temporal Representation Learning for Gait Recognition (HSTL),

L. Wanget al., “Hierarchical Spatio- Temporal Representation Learning for Gait Recognition (HSTL),” inProc. ICCV, 2023

2023
[15]

GaitGCI: Generative Coun- terfactual Intervention for Gait Recogni- tion,

H. Douet al., “GaitGCI: Generative Coun- terfactual Intervention for Gait Recogni- tion,” inProc. CVPR, 2023

2023
[16]

DyGait: Exploit- ing Dynamic Representations for High- Performance Gait Recognition,

M. Wanget al., “DyGait: Exploit- ing Dynamic Representations for High- Performance Gait Recognition,” inProc. ICCV, 2023

2023
[17]

GaitGS: Temporal Feature Learning in Granularity and Span Dimen- sion for Gait Recognition,

H. Xionget al., “GaitGS: Temporal Feature Learning in Granularity and Span Dimen- sion for Gait Recognition,” inProc. ICIP,
[18]

(arXiv:2305.19700, v3 Jun 2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[19]

Gaitsnippet: Gait recognition be- yond unordered sets and ordered sequences.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.07782, 2025

S. Houet al., “GaitSnippet: Gait Recogni- tion Beyond Unordered Sets and Ordered Sequences,” arXiv:2508.07782, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[20]

Gait Lateral Network: Learning Discrim- inative and Compact Representations for Gait Recognition,

S. Hou, C. Chen, X. Liu, and Z. He, “Gait Lateral Network: Learning Discrim- inative and Compact Representations for Gait Recognition,” inProc. ECCV, 2020, pp. 524–541

2020
[21]

Gait Recognition in the Wild with Dense 3D Representations and a Benchmark,

J. Zheng, X. Liu, W. Liu, L. He, C. Yan, and T. Mei, “Gait Recognition in the Wild with Dense 3D Representations and a Benchmark,” inProc. CVPR, 2022, pp. 20228–20237

2022
[22]

SkeletonGait: Gait Recognition Using Skeleton Maps,

C. Fan, Y. Zhou, S. Zhang, and X. Yu, “SkeletonGait: Gait Recognition Using Skeleton Maps,” inProc. AAAI, vol. 38, no. 2, 2024, pp. 1662–1669

2024
[23]

Human Gait Recognition Based on Frame-by-Frame Gait Energy Images and Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory,

X. Wang and W. Q. Yan, “Human Gait Recognition Based on Frame-by-Frame Gait Energy Images and Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory,”International Journal of Neural Systems, vol. 30, no. 1, p. 1950027, 2020

2020
[24]

Convolutional Bi- LSTM Based Human Gait Recognition Us- ing Video Sequences,

J. Amin, M. A. Anjum, M. Sharif, S. Kadry, Y. Nam, and S. Wang, “Convolutional Bi- LSTM Based Human Gait Recognition Us- ing Video Sequences,”Computers, Mate- rials & Continua, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 2693– 2709, 2021

2021
[25]

Gait Recognition by Combining the Long-Short- Term Attention Network and Personal Physiological Features,

C. Hua, Y. Pan, J. Li, and Z. Wang, “Gait Recognition by Combining the Long-Short- Term Attention Network and Personal Physiological Features,”Sensors, vol. 22, no. 22, p. 8779, 2022

2022
[26]

Gait-ViT: Gait Recognition 9 with Vision Transformer,

J. N. Mogan, C. P. Lee, K. M. Lim, and K. S. Muthu, “Gait-ViT: Gait Recognition 9 with Vision Transformer,”Sensors, vol. 22, no. 19, p. 7362, 2022

2022
[27]

Multi-Scale Context-Aware Network with Transformer for Gait Recognition,

D. Zhu, X. Huang, X. Wang, B. Yang, B. He, W. Liu, and B. Feng, “Multi-Scale Context-Aware Network with Transformer for Gait Recognition,” arXiv:2204.03270, 2022. 10

work page arXiv 2022