pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10052 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-11 · 💻 cs.CR · cs.NI

Impact of Intelligent Technologies on IoV Security: Integrating Edge Computing and AI

Awais Bilal , Kashif Sharif , Liehuang Zhu , Chang Xu , Fan Li , Sadaf Bukhari , Sujit Biswas This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CR cs.NI
keywords Internet of VehiclesEdge ComputingMachine LearningDeep LearningSecurityThreat DetectionCyber Threats
0
0 comments X

The pith

Integrating edge computing with machine learning and deep learning creates adaptive security for Internet of Vehicles networks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This survey examines how edge computing, machine learning, and deep learning combine to protect Internet of Vehicles networks from data privacy issues and cyber attacks. It reviews their separate roles and joint effects on faster threat detection, quicker responses, and more flexible defenses. Real-world case studies illustrate gains in security and efficiency for connected vehicle systems. The paper flags open problems such as building scalable privacy solutions and stronger defenses against new threats.

Core claim

The paper claims that combining Edge Computing for low-latency local processing, Machine Learning for pattern-based detection, and Deep Learning for handling complex threats produces more adaptive, efficient, and resilient security in IoV systems, as shown by practical deployments that address evolving transportation vulnerabilities.

What carries the argument

The synergy of edge computing for distributed processing, machine learning for anomaly recognition, and deep learning for layered threat analysis within IoV security frameworks.

If this is right

  • Threat detection improves and response times shorten in connected vehicle networks.
  • Security frameworks become more adaptive to changing conditions in transportation systems.
  • Operational efficiency rises while vulnerabilities decrease in real IoV deployments.
  • Research priorities shift toward scalable and privacy-preserving defenses against emerging threats.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Local processing at the edge may limit data exposure and support privacy without constant cloud uploads.
  • The same combination could apply to security in other mobile networks such as drones or smart infrastructure.
  • Testing under varied traffic densities and mobility patterns would clarify limits of the current case studies.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen case studies and reviewed deployments fairly represent the general performance of these integrated technologies without bias or overstatement.

What would settle it

A broad independent audit of IoV networks that finds no reduction in successful attacks or response delays in systems using the integrated edge, ML, and DL approaches versus conventional security methods.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10052 by Awais Bilal, Chang Xu, Fan Li, Kashif Sharif, Liehuang Zhu, Sadaf Bukhari, Sujit Biswas.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Data flow and interactions within the IoV frame [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of the paper structure. (3) In what ways do ML and DL techniques advance the detection, classification, and mitigation of security threats compared to traditional approaches? (4) How do ML and DL models enhance pattern recognition and anomaly detection capabilities within complex, high dimensional IoV data streams? (5) What synergistic benefits emerge from integrating EC with ML and DL technologie… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Taxonomy of IoV security technologies and key publications (2019–2025). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Search methodology for IoV security survey: Systematic data collection, screening, & analysis. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Hierarchical architecture of IoV. The security architecture of the IoV is typically conceptualized as a three-layered model, as illus￾trated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Distribution of different attack vectors in con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Impact of security incidents (year-wise % of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: EC in IoV security: Data flow & real time processing between vehicles, edge nodes, & central server. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Generalized EC architecture for IoV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Evolution of ML in cybersecurity. SVMs Random Forest Gradient Boosting KNN Naive Bayes Decision Trees K-Means Clustering PCA HMMs Ensemble Methods Anomaly Detection Threat Management Data Clustering Predictive Maintenance Traffic Management Threat Prediction Algorithms Functionalities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: High-level architecture of ML integration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Integrative model of EC, ML, and DL in enhancing IoV security. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The rapid development and integration of intelligent technologies in the Internet of Vehicles (IoV) have revolutionized transportation systems by enhancing connectivity, automation, and safety. However, the complexity and connectivity of IoV networks also introduce security challenges, including data privacy concerns, cyber threats, and system vulnerabilities. This paper surveys the role of Edge Computing (EC), Machine Learning (ML), and Deep Learning (DL) in strengthening IoV security frameworks. It examines the synergy between these technologies, highlighting their individual capabilities and their collective impact on enhancing threat detection, response times, and adaptive security. Through real world case studies and practical deployments, we demonstrate how EC, ML, and DL are currently improving security and operational efficiency in IoV systems. The paper also identifies key research gaps and future directions for further advancements in IoV security, including the need for scalable, privacy preserving solutions and robust defense mechanisms against emerging cyber threats. By integrating EC, ML, and DL, this work lays the groundwork for developing adaptive, efficient, and resilient IoV security infrastructures capable of addressing evolving challenges in the transportation ecosystem.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a literature survey on the role of Edge Computing (EC), Machine Learning (ML), and Deep Learning (DL) in IoV security. It reviews individual and synergistic capabilities of these technologies for threat detection, faster response, and adaptive security; summarizes real-world case studies and deployments; identifies gaps such as scalability and privacy preservation; and outlines future directions toward resilient IoV infrastructures.

Significance. If the cited studies are represented accurately and without selection bias, the survey could consolidate existing knowledge on EC-ML-DL synergies and usefully highlight actionable gaps for the IoV security community. Its contribution is typical of a well-structured review rather than a novel technical result.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrasing 'we demonstrate how EC, ML, and DL are currently improving security' implies original empirical demonstration, whereas the paper is a survey that aggregates and summarizes prior work; rephrasing to 'the paper reviews how...' would better reflect the contribution.
  2. [Conclusion (inferred from abstract)] The central claim that the survey 'lays the groundwork for developing adaptive... infrastructures' is standard survey language but would be stronger if the conclusion section explicitly maps identified gaps to concrete, testable research questions rather than general statements.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our survey manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. We are pleased that the work is recognized as a useful consolidation of existing knowledge on the synergies between edge computing, machine learning, and deep learning for IoV security, along with case studies and identified gaps. As the report contains no specific major comments, we have no individual points requiring point-by-point rebuttal or revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in this literature survey

full rationale

This paper is a survey aggregating existing literature on EC, ML, and DL for IoV security threats, synergies, case studies, gaps, and directions. It contains no original derivations, equations, predictions, or fitted parameters that could reduce to inputs by construction. The central claim—that the survey lays groundwork for adaptive infrastructures—is a standard contribution for review papers and does not depend on self-citation chains or internal reductions. Any self-citations are incidental and non-load-bearing, as there is no derivation chain to support. The work is self-contained as an external literature summary with no internal circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is a survey and introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all content reviews established concepts and cited studies from the literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5509 in / 1195 out tokens · 60331 ms · 2026-05-10T16:34:37.108126+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

214 extracted references · 214 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ghada Abdelmoumin et al. 2022. On the Performance of Machine Learning Models for Anomaly-Based Intelligent Intrusion Detection Systems for the Internet of Things.IEEE Internet of Things Journal9, 6 (March 2022), 4280–4290

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Abebe Abeshu et al. 2018. Deep Learning: The Frontier for Distributed Attack Detection in Fog-to-Things Computing. IEEE Communications Magazine56, 2 (Feb. 2018), 169–175

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Mariam M. N. Aboelwafa et al. 2020. A Machine-Learning-Based Technique for False Data Injection Attacks Detection in Industrial IoT.IEEE Internet of Things Journal7, 9 (Sept. 2020), 8462–8471

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Amine Abouaomar et al. 2021. Resource Provisioning in Edge Computing for Latency-Sensitive Applications.IEEE Internet of Things Journal8, 14 (July 2021), 11088–11099

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Erwin Adi et al. 2020. Machine learning and data analytics for the IoT.Neural Computing and Applications32, 20 (May 2020), 16205–16233

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Tejasvi Alladi et al. 2021. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Empowered Intrusion Detection Architecture for the Internet of Vehicles.IEEE Wireless Communications28, 3 (June 2021), 144–149

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Mohammed Almehdhar et al. 2024. Deep Learning in the Fast Lane: A Survey on Advanced Intrusion Detection Systems for Intelligent Vehicle Networks.IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology5 (2024), 869–906

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Alonso et al

    Ricardo S. Alonso et al. 2020. Deep Reinforcement Learning for the Management of Software-Defined Networks and Network Function Virtualization in an Edge-IoT Architecture.Sustainability12, 14 (July 2020), 5706

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Adel Alshamrani et al. 2019. A Survey on Advanced Persistent Threats: Techniques, Solutions, Challenges, and Research Opportunities.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials21, 2 (2019), 1851–1877

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Maram Alsharif et al. 2021. Study of Machine Learning for Cloud Assisted IoT Security as a Service.Sensors21, 4 (Feb. 2021), 1034

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Muhammad Naveed Aman et al. 2021. A Privacy-Preserving and Scalable Authentication Protocol for the Internet of Vehicles.IEEE Internet of Things Journal8, 2 (Jan. 2021), 1123–1139

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Javed Ashraf et al. 2021. Novel Deep Learning-Enabled LSTM Autoencoder Architecture for Discovering Anomalous Events From Intelligent Transportation Systems.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems22, 7 (July 2021), 4507–4518

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Muhammad Aslam et al. 2022. Adaptive Machine Learning Based Distributed Denial-of-Services Attacks Detection and Mitigation System for SDN-Enabled IoT.Sensors22, 7 (March 2022), 2697

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Upstream Auto. 2023. 2023 Automotive Cybersecurity Report. https://upstream.auto/reports/2023report/ Accessed: 2024-07

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Amin Azmoodeh et al. 2017. Detecting crypto-ransomware in IoT networks based on energy consumption footprint. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing9, 4 (Aug. 2017), 1141–1152

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Palak Bagga et al . 2021. On the Design of Mutual Authentication and Key Agreement Protocol in Internet of Vehicles-Enabled Intelligent Transportation System.IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology70, 2 (Feb. 2021), 1736–1751

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Chandra Bajracharya et al. 2022. Performance Evaluation for Secure Communications in Mobile Internet of Vehicles With Joint Reactive Jamming and Eavesdropping Attacks.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems23, 11 (Nov. 2022), 22563–22570

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Masoud Barati et al. 2020. GDPR Compliance Verification in Internet of Things.IEEE Access8 (2020), 119697–119709

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Deebak B.D. et al. 2020. A hybrid secure routing and monitoring mechanism in IoT-based wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks97 (Feb. 2020), 102022

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Showkat Ahmad Bhat et al. 2020. Edge Computing and Its Convergence With Blockchain in 5G and Beyond: Security, Challenges, and Opportunities.IEEE Access8 (2020), 205340–205373

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Surbhi Bhatia et al. 2022. Improved Multimedia Object Processing for the Internet of Vehicles.Sensors22, 11 (May 2022), 4133

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Abdelwahab Boualouache et al. 2023. A Survey on Machine Learning-Based Misbehavior Detection Systems for 5G and Beyond Vehicular Networks.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials25, 2 (2023), 1128–1172

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Amira Bourechak et al. 2023. At the Confluence of Artificial Intelligence and Edge Computing in IoT-Based Applica- tions: A Review and New Perspectives.Sensors23, 3 (Feb. 2023), 1639

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Sadaf Bukhari et al. 2024. Dynamic Fine-grained SLA Management for 6G eMBB-plus Slice using mDNN & Smart Contracts.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing(2024), 1–14

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    California State Legislature. 2018. California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) – Assembly Bill No. 375. https: //oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa Accessed: 2024-02-19. ACM Comput. Surv., Vol. XX, No. X, Article 111. Publication date: August 2026. Impact of Intelligent Technologies on IoV Security: Integrating Edge Computing and AI 111:29

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Xingjian Cao et al. 2023. PerFED-GAN: Personalized Federated Learning via Generative Adversarial Networks.IEEE Internet of Things Journal10, 5 (March 2023), 3749–3762

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Chuan Chen et al. 2019. A Secure and Efficient Blockchain-Based Data Trading Approach for Internet of Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology68, 9 (Sept. 2019), 9110–9121

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    Chen Chen et al. 2021. An Edge Traffic Flow Detection Scheme Based on Deep Learning in an Intelligent Transportation System.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems22, 3 (March 2021), 1840–1852

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Chien-Ming Chen et al . 2019. A Secure Authentication Protocol for Internet of Vehicles.IEEE Access7 (2019), 12047–12057

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    Jiageng Chen et al. 2018. Special Issue on Advanced Persistent Threat.Future Generation Computer Systems79 (Feb. 2018), 243–246

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Jiasi Chen et al. 2019. Deep Learning With Edge Computing: A Review.Proc. IEEE107, 8 (Aug. 2019), 1655–1674

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Yanjiao Chen et al. 2020. Deep Learning on Mobile and Embedded Devices: State-of-the-art, Challenges, and Future Directions.Comput. Surveys53, 4 (Aug. 2020), 1–37

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Xiongwen Cheng et al. 2019. Space/Aerial-Assisted Computing Offloading for IoT Applications: A Learning-Based Approach.IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications37, 5 (May 2019), 1117–1129

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Haruna Chiroma et al. 2021. Deep Learning-Based Big Data Analytics for Internet of Vehicles: Taxonomy, Challenges, and Research Directions.Mathematical Problems in Engineering2021 (Nov. 2021), 1–20

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Young-June Choi et al. 2017. Special issue on V2X communications and networks.Journal of Communications and Networks19, 3 (2017), 205–208

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    Cities Forum. 2023. What Made Shanghai the World’s No. 1 Smart City. https://www.citiesforum.org/news/what- made-shanghai-the-worlds-no-1-smart-city Accessed: 2024-08-03

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Mauro Conti et al. 2016. A Survey of Man In The Middle Attacks.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials18, 3 (2016), 2027–2051

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Gianpiero Costantino et al. 2022. In-Depth Exploration of ISO/SAE 21434 and Its Correlations with Existing Standards. IEEE Communications Standards Magazine6, 1 (March 2022), 84–92

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Guangming Cui et al. 2022. Efficient Verification of Edge Data Integrity in Edge Computing Environment.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing15, 6 (Nov. 2022), 3233–3244

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Jie Cui et al. 2018. Privacy-Preserving Authentication Using a Double Pseudonym for Internet of Vehicles.Sensors18, 5 (May 2018), 1453

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Laizhong Cui et al. 2020. A Decentralized and Trusted Edge Computing Platform for Internet of Things.IEEE Internet of Things Journal7, 5 (May 2020), 3910–3922

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    Laizhong Cui et al. 2021. A Blockchain-Based Containerized Edge Computing Platform for the Internet of Vehicles. IEEE Internet of Things Journal8, 4 (Feb. 2021), 2395–2408

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Cheng Dai et al . 2020. A Low-Latency Object Detection Algorithm for the Edge Devices of IoV Systems.IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology69, 10 (Oct. 2020), 11169–11178

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Wenbin Dai et al. 2019. Industrial Edge Computing: Enabling Embedded Intelligence.IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine13, 4 (Dec. 2019), 48–56

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Yueyue Dai et al. 2019. Artificial Intelligence Empowered Edge Computing and Caching for Internet of Vehicles.IEEE Wireless Communications26, 3 (June 2019), 12–18

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Tasneem S. J. Darwish et al. 2018. Fog Based Intelligent Transportation Big Data Analytics in The Internet of Vehicles Environment: Motivations, Architecture, Challenges, and Critical Issues.IEEE Access6 (2018), 15679–15701

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Sagar Dasgupta et al. 2022. A Sensor Fusion-Based GNSS Spoofing Attack Detection Framework for Autonomous Vehicles.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems23, 12 (Dec. 2022), 23559–23572

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Shuiguang Deng et al. 2020. Edge Intelligence: The Confluence of Edge Computing and Artificial Intelligence.IEEE Internet of Things Journal7, 8 (2020), 7457–7469

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    Hamza Djigal et al. 2022. Machine and Deep Learning for Resource Allocation in Multi-Access Edge Computing: A Survey.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials24, 4 (2022), 2449–2494

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Shi Dong et al. 2021. Network Abnormal Traffic Detection Model Based on Semi-Supervised Deep Reinforcement Learning.IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management18, 4 (Dec. 2021), 4197–4212

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Elsayed et al

    Marwa A. Elsayed et al. 2020. PredictDeep: Security Analytics as a Service for Anomaly Detection and Prediction. IEEE Access8 (2020), 45184–45197

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    European Parliament and Council of the European Union. 2016. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) – Regulation (EU) 2016/679. https://gdpr-info.eu/ Accessed: 2024-02-19

    work page 2016

  53. [53]

    Yuqi Fan et al. 2021. DR-BFT: A consensus algorithm for blockchain-based multi-layer data integrity framework in dynamic edge computing system.Future Generation Computer Systems124 (Nov. 2021), 33–48

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    Cherine Fathy et al. 2022. Integrating Deep Learning-Based IoT and Fog Computing with Software-Defined Networking for Detecting Weapons in Video Surveillance Systems.Sensors22, 14 (July 2022), 5075. doi:10.3390/s22145075 ACM Comput. Surv., Vol. XX, No. X, Article 111. Publication date: August 2026. 111:30 Bilal et al

    work page doi:10.3390/s22145075 2022

  55. [55]

    Fernandez-Carames

    Tiago M. Fernandez-Carames. 2020. From Pre-Quantum to Post-Quantum IoT Security: A Survey on Quantum- Resistant Cryptosystems for the Internet of Things.IEEE Internet of Things Journal7, 7 (July 2020), 6457–6480

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Mohamed Amine Ferrag et al. 2021. Federated Deep Learning for Cyber Security in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Applications, and Experimental Analysis.IEEE Access9 (2021), 138509–138542

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Mohamed Amine Ferrag et al. 2022. Edge-IIoTset: A New Comprehensive Realistic Cyber Security Dataset of IoT and IIoT Applications for Centralized and Federated Learning.IEEE Access10 (2022), 40281–40306

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    Wenliang Fu et al. 2016. A practical intrusion detection system for Internet of vehicles.China Communications13, 10 (Oct. 2016), 263–275

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    Ying Gao et al. 2018. A Novel Semi-Supervised Learning Approach for Network Intrusion Detection on Cloud-Based Robotic System.IEEE Access6 (2018), 50927–50938

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    Ivan Garcia-Magarino et al. 2019. Security in Vehicles With IoT by Prioritization Rules, Vehicle Certificates, and Trust Management.IEEE Internet of Things Journal6, 4 (Aug. 2019), 5927–5934

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    Sahil Garg et al. 2021. Security in IoT-Driven Mobile Edge Computing: New Paradigms, Challenges, and Opportunities. IEEE Network35, 5 (Sept. 2021), 298–305

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    Maoguo Gong et al. 2023. Self-Paced Co-Training of Graph Neural Networks for Semi-Supervised Node Classification. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems34, 11 (Nov. 2023), 9234–9247

    work page 2023

  63. [63]

    PTV Group. 2024. AI in traffic management systems: How Artificial Intelligence is Shaping the Future of Mobility. https://www.ptvgroup.com/en/application-areas/ai-in-transportation Accessed: 2024-08

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Harsh Grover et al. 2021. Edge Computing and Deep Learning Enabled Secure Multitier Network for Internet of Vehicles.IEEE Internet of Things Journal8, 19 (Oct. 2021), 14787–14796

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    Li Guo et al. 2021. Optimal Allocation of False Data Injection Attacks for Networked Control Systems With Two Communication Channels.IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems8, 1 (March 2021), 2–14

    work page 2021

  66. [66]

    Daya Sagar Gupta et al. 2022. Quantum-Defended Blockchain-Assisted Data Authentication Protocol for Internet of Vehicles.IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology71, 3 (March 2022), 3255–3266

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    Sohan Gyawali et al. 2020. Machine Learning and Reputation Based Misbehavior Detection in Vehicular Communica- tion Networks.IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology69, 8 (Aug. 2020), 8871–8885

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    Mohammad Hamad et al. 2024. REACT: Autonomous intrusion response system for intelligent vehicles.Computers & Security145 (2024), 104008

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    Brian Haugli. 2023. Electric vehicles are taking over. Hackers are waiting. https://www.securitymagazine.com/artic les/97461-electric-vehicles-are-taking-over-hackers-are-waiting Accessed: 2024-08

    work page 2023

  70. [70]

    Ying He et al. 2021. Blockchain-Based Edge Computing Resource Allocation in IoT: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach.IEEE Internet of Things Journal8, 4 (Feb. 2021), 2226–2237

    work page 2021

  71. [71]

    Xiangwang Hou et al. 2020. Reliable Computation Offloading for Edge-Computing-Enabled Software-Defined IoV. IEEE Internet of Things Journal7, 8 (Aug. 2020), 7097–7111

    work page 2020

  72. [72]

    Rui Huang et al. 2022. Quantum Federated Learning With Decentralized Data.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics28, 4 (July 2022), 1–10

    work page 2022

  73. [73]

    Xumin Huang et al. 2018. Secure Roadside Unit Hotspot Against Eavesdropping Based Traffic Analysis in Edge Computing Based Internet of Vehicles.IEEE Access6 (2018), 62371–62383

    work page 2018

  74. [74]

    Mamoona Humayun et al. 2021. Internet of things and ransomware: Evolution, mitigation and prevention.Egyptian Informatics Journal22, 1 (March 2021), 105–117

    work page 2021

  75. [75]

    Fatima Hussain et al . 2020. Machine Learning in IoT Security: Current Solutions and Future Challenges.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials22, 3 (2020), 1686–1721

    work page 2020

  76. [76]

    IEEE. 2024. IEEE Draft Guide for Blockchain in Power and Energy Systems.IEEE P2418.5/D1.0, May 2024(2024), 1–98

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    MohammadNoor Injadat et al. 2021. Multi-Stage Optimized Machine Learning Framework for Network Intrusion Detection.IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management18, 2 (June 2021), 1803–1816

    work page 2021

  78. [78]

    International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 2024. ISO/TC 307: Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technolo- gies Committee. https://www.iso.org/committee/6266604.html Accessed: 2024-02-19

    work page arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). 2022. ISO/IEC 27001: Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection — Information security management systems — Requirements. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso:std:iso-iec:27001:ed-3:v1:en Accessed: 2024-02-19

    work page 2022

  80. [80]

    International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). 2021. ISO/SAE 21434: Road Vehicles – Cybersecurity Engineering. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso:std:iso-sae:21434:ed-1:v1:en Accessed: 2024-02-19

    work page 2021

Showing first 80 references.