pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10243 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-11 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Quantum Protocols for Time Synchronisation and Distribution: A Critical Assessment

Michal Krelina , Utku Tefek , Zeki C. Seskir , Kadir Durak
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum time synchronizationtime distributionoptical clocksmetrologyquantum key distributionentangled photonscritical assessmentphysical layer security
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum time synchronisation will not replace classical methods for most applications soon

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews quantum protocols for clock synchronisation and time distribution that rely on entangled photon pairs, QKD correlations, Hong-Ou-Mandel interference and entangled clock networks. It benchmarks these approaches against classical systems ranging from NTP and GPS to laboratory optical frequency transfer, while quantifying practical limits set by sources, detectors and channels. The key finding is that the best demonstrated quantum time transfer reaches only 2.46 picoseconds of uncertainty, two to three orders of magnitude short of what optical clocks with 10^{-18} to 10^{-19} fractional frequency uncertainty require. As a result the assessment concludes that quantum methods will not displace classical timing for most uses in the near-to-medium term. Their main near-term roles are physical-layer security against timing manipulation and integration with quantum communication networks, while closing the metrology synchronisation gap remains the central open problem.

Core claim

Time transfer, not clock performance, is now the bottleneck for distributed optical timekeeping. The best quantum synchronisation uncertainty of 2.46 ps falls two to three orders of magnitude short of the precision needed to support optical clocks at 10^{-18}--10^{-19} fractional frequency uncertainty, so quantum time synchronisation will not replace classical methods for most applications in the near-to-medium future. Its primary near-term value lies in physical-layer security and integration with quantum networks.

What carries the argument

Comparative assessment of quantum time synchronisation protocol families (entangled photons, QKD correlations, Hong-Ou-Mandel interference, entangled clock networks) versus classical timing standards, with emphasis on the demonstrated 2.46 ps uncertainty limit and hardware bottlenecks.

If this is right

  • Quantum timing protocols can supply physical-layer security against manipulation in critical infrastructure.
  • Near-term deployments are most realistic inside quantum communication networks rather than standalone replacements for GPS or NTP.
  • Scientific metrology remains the hardest use case and the one that would most benefit from closing the synchronisation gap.
  • Classical methods will continue to dominate telecommunications, power grids and financial trading until the precision gap narrows.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Hybrid quantum-classical timing systems may serve as a practical bridge while the metrology gap is addressed.
  • Improved quantum time transfer could support secure coordination across future large-scale quantum sensor arrays.
  • Success in closing the gap would enable fully quantum-secured global timing without classical fallback vulnerabilities.

Load-bearing premise

That the 2.46 ps quantum performance figure marks the current practical limit and that classical optical frequency transfer will not improve fast enough to meet optical-clock distribution needs before quantum methods advance.

What would settle it

An experimental demonstration of quantum time transfer with uncertainty at or below a few femtoseconds, or a classical optical transfer system achieving equivalent performance for distributed 10^{-18} optical clocks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10243 by Kadir Durak, Michal Krelina, Utku Tefek, Zeki C. Seskir.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Clock fractional frequency uncertainty versus synchronisation uncertainty for current time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Precise time synchronisation underpins critical infrastructure from telecommunications and financial markets to power grids and scientific metrology. Several families of quantum protocols have been proposed and demonstrated for clock synchronisation and time distribution, exploiting entangled photon pairs, quantum key distribution (QKD) correlations, Hong-Ou-Mandel interference, and entangled clock networks. We critically assess these approaches, reviewing the main quantum time synchronisation (QTS) protocol families, quantifying the gap between theory and experiment, and identifying practical bottlenecks in sources, detectors, and channels. We survey the classical timing landscape from Network Time Protocol (NTP) and GPS to laboratory-grade optical frequency transfer, and compare quantum and classical methods at equivalent maturity. We examine use cases including financial trading, power grids, telecommunications, scientific metrology, and military applications, evaluating whether quantum timing offers a realistic advantage. We show that time transfer, not clock performance, is now the bottleneck for distributed optical timekeeping: the best demonstrated synchronisation uncertainty (2.46~ps) falls two to three orders of magnitude short of what optical clocks with fractional frequency uncertainties of $10^{-18}$--$10^{-19}$ require. Our assessment is that quantum time synchronisation will not replace classical methods for most applications in the near-to-medium future. Its near-term value lies in physical-layer security against timing manipulation and integration with quantum communication networks, while closing the synchronisation gap for scientific metrology remains the most critical open challenge.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript critically reviews families of quantum time synchronisation (QTS) protocols based on entangled photon pairs, QKD correlations, Hong-Ou-Mandel interference, and entangled clock networks. It quantifies the experimental gap to classical methods (best cited QTS uncertainty 2.46 ps versus optical-clock requirements of 10^{-18}--10^{-19} fractional uncertainty), identifies bottlenecks in sources/detectors/channels, surveys classical timing from NTP/GPS to optical frequency transfer, and evaluates use cases in finance, power grids, telecom, metrology, and military applications. The central conclusion is that QTS will not replace classical methods for most applications in the near-to-medium term, with near-term value limited to physical-layer security and quantum-network integration while closing the metrology synchronisation gap remains the key open challenge.

Significance. If the gap quantification and literature benchmarks hold, the paper supplies a timely, field-guiding assessment that tempers expectations for QTS while pinpointing concrete near-term niches (security against timing attacks, integration with QKD networks) and the dominant remaining technical barrier (time transfer for distributed optical clocks). The explicit comparison at equivalent maturity levels and the focus on practical bottlenecks are strengths that can usefully inform funding and experimental priorities.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experimental demonstrations and gap quantification] § on experimental demonstrations and the 2.46 ps benchmark: the central claim that this represents the current practical limit of quantum time transfer (and thus the size of the gap to optical-clock needs) is load-bearing for the replacement assessment; the manuscript must include an explicit, dated literature cutoff and a table enumerating all cited demonstrations with their uncertainty budgets to allow verification that no superior post-2023 results were omitted.
  2. [Use cases and practical advantages] Use-cases section (financial trading, power grids, military): the assertion that physical-layer security constitutes a realistic near-term advantage is central to the positive part of the conclusion, yet the quantitative security analysis against classical timing-manipulation attacks is only sketched; a short table or calculation showing the attack surface reduction relative to classical optical links would strengthen the claim.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Throughout] The abstract and main text use both 'synchronisation' and 'synchronization'; adopt a single spelling for consistency.
  2. [Classical vs quantum comparison] Add a summary table in the classical-vs-quantum comparison section that lists representative uncertainties, distances, and maturity levels side-by-side for the main protocol families.
  3. [Introduction or metrology subsection] The statement that 'time transfer, not clock performance, is now the bottleneck' would benefit from a one-sentence reference to the specific optical-clock stability figures (e.g., 10^{-18} at 1 s averaging) that set the 10^{-18}--10^{-19} target.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and positive assessment of the manuscript's significance. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested clarifications and additions in the revised version to strengthen the verifiability and quantitative support for our conclusions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: § on experimental demonstrations and the 2.46 ps benchmark: the central claim that this represents the current practical limit of quantum time transfer (and thus the size of the gap to optical-clock needs) is load-bearing for the replacement assessment; the manuscript must include an explicit, dated literature cutoff and a table enumerating all cited demonstrations with their uncertainty budgets to allow verification that no superior post-2023 results were omitted.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit literature cutoff and tabulated summary of demonstrations will improve transparency and allow independent verification of the gap quantification. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph specifying the literature search cutoff (December 2023, matching the submission timeline) together with a compact table that lists every cited experimental QTS result, its reported synchronisation uncertainty, key experimental parameters (source, detector, channel), and reference. This table will confirm that 2.46 ps remains the best published value within the reviewed corpus and that no superior post-2023 demonstrations were omitted. The central claim concerning the practical limit of quantum time transfer is therefore unchanged, but its evidentiary basis will be more readily auditable. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Use-cases section (financial trading, power grids, military): the assertion that physical-layer security constitutes a realistic near-term advantage is central to the positive part of the conclusion, yet the quantitative security analysis against classical timing-manipulation attacks is only sketched; a short table or calculation showing the attack surface reduction relative to classical optical links would strengthen the claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the security discussion in the use-cases section is primarily qualitative. To address this, the revised manuscript will include a short table (or inline calculation) that contrasts the attack surface of classical optical timing links with that of quantum-enhanced protocols. The table will enumerate representative attack vectors (e.g., delay insertion, man-in-the-middle, spoofing) and indicate which are mitigated by entanglement-based authentication or QKD-integrated timing, together with a brief estimate of the reduction in feasible attack surface under realistic channel assumptions. This addition will provide a more concrete quantitative anchor for the near-term security advantage without altering the overall conclusion that such benefits are niche rather than broadly replacement-level. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper is a literature review and comparative assessment of quantum versus classical time synchronization protocols. It draws performance benchmarks (e.g., the 2.46 ps figure) and requirements (10^{-18}--10^{-19} fractional uncertainty) directly from external cited works rather than fitting parameters to its own data or deriving predictions that reduce to self-referential definitions. No equations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are introduced that loop back to the paper's inputs; the central conclusions follow from surveying independent experimental results and use-case requirements.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard assumptions from quantum optics and metrology literature rather than new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities introduced by this paper.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5573 in / 1148 out tokens · 37926 ms · 2026-05-10T15:53:18.304402+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    White Rabbit: A PTP Application for Robust Sub-nanosecond Synchroniza- tion

    M. Lipi´ nski et al. “White Rabbit: A PTP Application for Robust Sub-nanosecond Synchroniza- tion”. In:Proc. IEEE ISPCS(2011), pp. 25–30.doi:10.1109/ISPCS.2011.6070148

    work page doi:10.1109/ispcs.2011.6070148 2011

  2. [2]

    Optical-Frequency Transfer over a Single-Span 1840 km Fiber Link

    Stefan Droste et al. “Optical-Frequency Transfer over a Single-Span 1840 km Fiber Link”. In: Physical Review Letters111 (2013), p. 110801.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.110801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.110801 2013

  3. [3]

    Humphreys.GPS Spoofing and the Financial Sector

    Todd E. Humphreys.GPS Spoofing and the Financial Sector. Tech. rep. Radionavigation Labora- tory, University of Texas at Austin, 2011.url:http://hdl.handle.net/2152/63513

    2011

  4. [4]

    Asymmetric delay attack on an entanglement-based bidirectional clock synchro- nization protocol

    Jianwei Lee et al. “Asymmetric delay attack on an entanglement-based bidirectional clock synchro- nization protocol”. In:Applied Physics Letters115.14 (2019), p. 141101.doi:10.1063/1.5121489. arXiv:1907.09661

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5121489 2019

  5. [5]

    Safety Report 2024

    International Air Transport Association. “Safety Report 2024”. In: (2025). Released 26 February

    2024

  6. [6]

    See press release:https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/2025-releases/2025-02-26- 01/

    2025

  7. [7]

    Quantum-enhanced positioning and clock synchronization

    Vittorio Giovannetti, Seth Lloyd, and Lorenzo Maccone. “Quantum-enhanced positioning and clock synchronization”. In:Nature412 (2001), pp. 417–419.doi:10.1038/35086525. arXiv:quant- ph/0103006

    work page doi:10.1038/35086525 2001

  8. [8]

    Clock synchronization with dispersion cancellation

    Vittorio Giovannetti et al. “Clock synchronization with dispersion cancellation”. In:Physical Re- view Letters87.11 (2001), p. 117902.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett . 87 . 117902. arXiv:quant - ph/0105156

    work page arXiv 2001

  9. [9]

    Secure quantum clock synchronization

    Ant´ ıa Lamas-Linares and James Troupe. “Secure quantum clock synchronization”. In:Proc. SPIE. Vol. 10547. 2018, p. 105470L.doi:10.1117/12.2290561

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2290561 2018

  10. [10]

    Quantum Clock Synchronization Networks: A Survey

    Uman Khalid et al. “Quantum Clock Synchronization Networks: A Survey”. In: (2026). arXiv: 2604.04437

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  11. [11]

    Comparing ultrastable lasers at 7×10 −17 fractional frequency instability through a 2220 km optical fibre network

    M. Schioppo et al. “Comparing ultrastable lasers at 7×10 −17 fractional frequency instability through a 2220 km optical fibre network”. In:Nature Communications13 (2022), p. 212.doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27884-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27884-3 2022

  12. [12]

    Quantum Clock Synchronization Based on Shared Prior Entanglement

    Richard Jozsa et al. “Quantum Clock Synchronization Based on Shared Prior Entanglement”. In: Physical Review Letters85.9 (2000), pp. 2010–2013.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2010. arXiv: quant-ph/0004105

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.2010 2000

  13. [13]

    Quantum Algorithm for Distributed Clock Synchronization

    Isaac L. Chuang. “Quantum Algorithm for Distributed Clock Synchronization”. In:Physical Review Letters85.9 (2000), pp. 2006–2009.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett . 85 . 2006. arXiv:quant - ph / 0005092

    2000

  14. [14]

    Quantum clock synchronization and quantum error correction

    John Preskill. “Quantum clock synchronization and quantum error correction”. In: (2000). Pre- sented at NASA-DoD Workshop on Quantum Information and Clock Synchronization for Space Applications (QuICSSA). arXiv:quant-ph/0010098

    work page arXiv 2000

  15. [15]

    Remote quantum clock synchronization without synchronized clocks

    Emmanuel O. Ilo-Okeke et al. “Remote quantum clock synchronization without synchronized clocks”. In:npj Quantum Information4 (2018), p. 40.doi:10 . 1038 / s41534 - 018 - 0090 - 2. arXiv:1709.08423

    work page arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Nuclear magnetic resonance implementation of a quantum clock synchroniza- tion algorithm

    Jingfu Zhang et al. “Nuclear magnetic resonance implementation of a quantum clock synchroniza- tion algorithm”. In:Physical Review A70 (2004), p. 062322.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.70.062322

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.70.062322 2004

  17. [17]

    Distant clock synchronization using entangled photon pairs

    Alejandra Valencia, Giuliano Scarcelli, and Yanhua Shih. “Distant clock synchronization using entangled photon pairs”. In:Applied Physics Letters85.13 (2004), pp. 2655–2657.doi:10.1063/ 1.1797561. arXiv:quant-ph/0407204

    work page arXiv 2004

  18. [18]

    Fiber-optic two-way quantum time transfer with frequency-entangled pulses

    Feiyan Hou et al. “Fiber-optic two-way quantum time transfer with frequency-entangled pulses”. In:Physical Review A100.2 (2019), p. 023849.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevA . 100 . 023849. arXiv: 1812.10077

    work page arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    Demonstration of 50 km Fiber-Optic Two-Way Quantum Clock Synchroniza- tion

    Huibo Hong et al. “Demonstration of 50 km Fiber-Optic Two-Way Quantum Clock Synchroniza- tion”. In:Journal of Lightwave Technology40.12 (2022), pp. 3723–3728. arXiv:2111.00380

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Quantum Two-Way Time Transfer Over a 103 km Urban Fiber,

    Huibo Hong et al. “Quantum Two-Way Time Transfer Over a 103-km Urban Fiber Link”. In: Journal of Lightwave Technology(2024).doi:10.1109/JLT.2023.3323434. arXiv:2305.01897. 21 Quantum Protocols for Time Synchronisation and Distribution

    work page doi:10.1109/jlt.2023.3323434 2024

  21. [21]

    Quantum two-way time transfer over a 250 km direct fiber-optic link

    Bingke Shi et al. “Quantum two-way time transfer over a 250 km direct fiber-optic link”. In:Optics Express32.25 (2024), pp. 43805–43814.doi:10.1364/OE.536691

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.536691 2024

  22. [22]

    Quantum two-way time transfer over a hybrid free-space and fiber link

    Xiao Xiang et al. “Quantum two-way time transfer over a hybrid free-space and fiber link”. In: Quantum Science and Technology8.4 (2023), p. 045017.doi:10.1088/2058-9565/acedc9. arXiv: 2212.01741

    work page doi:10.1088/2058-9565/acedc9 2023

  23. [23]

    Two-Way Quantum Time Transfer: A Method for Daytime Space-Earth Links

    Randy Lafler et al. “Two-Way Quantum Time Transfer: A Method for Daytime Space-Earth Links”. In:Physical Review Applied22 (2024), p. 024012.doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.024012. arXiv:2307.07371

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.22.024012 2024

  24. [24]

    Clock synchronization by remote de- tection of correlated photon pairs

    Caleb Ho, Ant´ ıa Lamas-Linares, and Christian Kurtsiefer. “Clock synchronization by remote de- tection of correlated photon pairs”. In:New Journal of Physics11 (2009), p. 045011.doi:10. 1088/1367-2630/11/4/045011. arXiv:0901.3203

    work page arXiv 2009

  25. [25]

    Symmetrical clock synchronization with time-correlated photon pairs

    Jianwei Lee et al. “Symmetrical clock synchronization with time-correlated photon pairs”. In: Applied Physics Letters114.10 (2019), p. 101102.doi:10.1063/1.5086493. arXiv:1812.08450

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5086493 2019

  26. [26]

    Towards satellite-based quantum-secure time transfer

    Hui Dai et al. “Towards satellite-based quantum-secure time transfer”. In:Nature Physics16 (2020), pp. 848–852.doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0892-y. arXiv:2006.00666

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0892-y 2020

  27. [27]

    Demonstration of 75 km-fiber quantum clock synchronization in quantum entanglement distribution network

    Bang-Ying Tang et al. “Demonstration of 75 km-fiber quantum clock synchronization in quantum entanglement distribution network”. In:EPJ Quantum Technology10 (2023), p. 50.doi:10.1140/ epjqt/s40507-023-00207-9

    2023

  28. [28]

    Demonstration of quantum synchronization based on second-order quantum co- herence of entangled photons

    Runai Quan et al. “Demonstration of quantum synchronization based on second-order quantum co- herence of entangled photons”. In:Scientific Reports6 (2016), p. 30453.doi:10.1038/srep30453

    work page doi:10.1038/srep30453 2016

  29. [29]

    Attosecond-resolution Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometry

    Ashley Lyons et al. “Attosecond-resolution Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometry”. In:Science Advances 4.5 (2018), eaap9416.doi:10.1126/sciadv.aap9416

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aap9416 2018

  30. [30]

    A quantum network of clocks

    P. K´ om´ ar et al. “A quantum network of clocks”. In:Nature Physics10 (2014), pp. 582–587.doi: 10.1038/nphys3000. arXiv:1310.6045

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3000 2014

  31. [31]

    An elementary quantum network of entangled optical atomic clocks

    Bethan C. Nichol et al. “An elementary quantum network of entangled optical atomic clocks”. In: Nature609 (2022), pp. 689–694.doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05088-z. arXiv:2111.10336

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05088-z 2022

  32. [32]

    Multi-qubit gates and Schr¨ odinger cat states in an optical clock

    Xiaogang Cao et al. “Multi-qubit gates and Schr¨ odinger cat states in an optical clock”. In:Nature 634 (2024), pp. 315–320.doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07913-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07913-z 2024

  33. [33]

    Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet,

    Koji Azuma et al. “Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet”. In: Reviews of Modern Physics95 (2023), p. 045006.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.95.045006

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.95.045006 2023

  34. [34]

    Quantum-limited optical time transfer for future geosynchronous links

    Emily D. Caldwell et al. “Quantum-limited optical time transfer for future geosynchronous links”. In:Nature618 (2023), pp. 721–726.doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06032-5. arXiv:2212.12541

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06032-5 2023

  35. [35]

    The elusive Heisenberg limit in quantum-enhanced metrology

    Rafa l Demkowicz-Dobrza´ nski, Jan Ko lody´ nski, and M˘ ad˘ alin Gut ¸˘ a. “The elusive Heisenberg limit in quantum-enhanced metrology”. In:Nature Communications3 (2012), p. 1063.doi:10.1038/ ncomms2067

    2012

  36. [36]

    Clock precision beyond the Standard Quantum Limit at 10 −18 level

    Y. A. Yang et al. “Clock precision beyond the Standard Quantum Limit at 10 −18 level”. In: (2025). arXiv:2505.04538

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Fine-grained All-fiber Nonlocal Dispersion Compensation in the Telecommunications O-Band

    RuiMing Chua, James A. Grieve, and Alexander Ling. “Fine-grained All-fiber Nonlocal Dispersion Compensation in the Telecommunications O-Band”. In:Optics Express30.9 (2022), pp. 15607– 15615.doi:10.1364/OE.454907. arXiv:2201.10962

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.454907 2022

  38. [38]

    Exploiting Nonlocal Correlations for Dispersion- Resilient Quantum Communications

    Hao Yu, Benjamin Crockett, Nicola Montaut, et al. “Exploiting Nonlocal Correlations for Dispersion- Resilient Quantum Communications”. In:Physical Review Letters134 (2025), p. 220801.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.220801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.220801 2025

  39. [39]

    Single-photon detection using large- scale high-temperature MgB 2 sensors at 20 K

    Ilya Charaev, Emma K. Batson, Sergey Cherednichenko, et al. “Single-photon detection using large- scale high-temperature MgB 2 sensors at 20 K”. In:Nature Communications15 (2024), p. 3973. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47353-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47353-x 2024

  40. [40]

    Continuous entanglement distribution over a transnational 248 km fibre link

    Sebastian Philipp Neumann et al. “Continuous entanglement distribution over a transnational 248 km fibre link”. In:Nature Communications13 (2022), p. 6134.doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33919-

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33919- 2022

  41. [41]

    Entanglement-verified time distribution in a metropolitan network

    Mohammed K. Alqedra et al. “Entanglement-verified time distribution in a metropolitan network”. In: (2025). arXiv:2504.00802. 22 Quantum Protocols for Time Synchronisation and Distribution

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    & DiVincenzo, D

    Dashiell L. P. Vitullo et al. “Entanglement Swapping for Generation of Heralded Time-Frequency- Entangled Photon Pairs”. In:Physical Review A98 (2018), p. 023836.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA. 98.023836. arXiv:1802.00110

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva 2018

  43. [43]

    Cascaded quantum time transfer bypassing the no-cloning barrier

    H. Hong et al. “Cascaded quantum time transfer bypassing the no-cloning barrier”. In:Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy69 (2026).doi:10.1007/s11433- 025- 2781- 4. arXiv: 2506.12882

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433- 2026

  44. [44]

    Micius, the world’s first quantum communication satellite, was hackable

    Alexander Miller. “Micius, the world’s first quantum communication satellite, was hackable”. In: (2025). arXiv:2505.06532

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Internet time synchronization: the Network Time Protocol

    David L. Mills. “Internet time synchronization: the Network Time Protocol”. In:IEEE Transactions on Communications39.10 (1991), pp. 1482–1493.doi:10.1109/26.103043

    work page doi:10.1109/26.103043 1991

  46. [46]

    White Rabbit: Sub-Nanosecond Timing Distribution over Ethernet

    P. Moreira et al. “White Rabbit: Sub-Nanosecond Timing Distribution over Ethernet”. In:Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Precision Clock Synchronization (ISPCS). 2009, pp. 1–5.doi: 10.1109/ISPCS.2009.5340196

    work page doi:10.1109/ispcs.2009.5340196 2009

  47. [47]

    White Rabbit Precision Time Protocol on Long-Distance Fiber Links

    Erik F. Dierikx et al. “White Rabbit Precision Time Protocol on Long-Distance Fiber Links”. In: IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control63.7 (2016), pp. 945–952. doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2518122

    work page doi:10.1109/tuffc.2016.2518122 2016

  48. [48]

    Unrepeated White Rabbit Time Synchronisation over a 300 km Optical Fibre Link

    Benjamin Amies-King and Marco Lucamarini. “Unrepeated White Rabbit Time Synchronisation over a 300 km Optical Fibre Link”. In: (2025). arXiv:2511.23254

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Two-way time transfer via communication satellites

    D. Kirchner. “Two-way time transfer via communication satellites”. In:Proceedings of the IEEE 79.7 (1991), pp. 983–990.doi:10.1109/5.84975

    work page doi:10.1109/5.84975 1991

  50. [50]

    Fiber-Optic Joint Time and Frequency Transfer With Active Stabi- lization of the Propagation Delay

    Przemys law Krehlik et al. “Fiber-Optic Joint Time and Frequency Transfer With Active Stabi- lization of the Propagation Delay”. In:IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 61.10 (2012), pp. 2844–2851.doi:10.1109/TIM.2012.2196396

    work page doi:10.1109/tim.2012.2196396 2012

  51. [51]

    Dissemination of time and RF frequency via a stabilized fibre optic link over a distance of 420 km

    Lukasz ´Sliwczy´ nski et al. “Dissemination of time and RF frequency via a stabilized fibre optic link over a distance of 420 km”. In:Metrologia50.2 (2013), pp. 133–145.doi:10.1088/0026- 1394/50/2/133

    work page doi:10.1088/0026- 2013

  52. [52]

    A clock network for geodesy and fundamental science

    C. Lisdat et al. “A clock network for geodesy and fundamental science”. In:Nature Communications 7 (2016), p. 12443.doi:10.1038/ncomms12443

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms12443 2016

  53. [53]

    Clock synchronization with correlated photons

    Christoph Spiess et al. “Clock synchronization with correlated photons”. In:Physical Review Ap- plied19.5 (2023), p. 054082.doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.054082. arXiv:2108.13466

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.19.054082 2023

  54. [54]

    High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5×10 −19 Systematic Uncertainty

    Mason C. Marshall et al. “High-Stability Single-Ion Clock with 5.5×10 −19 Systematic Uncertainty”. In:Physical Review Letters135.3 (2025), p. 033201.doi:10.1103/hb3c-dk28. arXiv:2504.13071

    work page doi:10.1103/hb3c-dk28 2025

  55. [55]

    Trapping-field-free operation of an 88Sr+ optical clock at the low 10 −19 fractional uncertainty

    Thomas Lindvall et al. “Trapping-field-free operation of an 88Sr+ optical clock at the low 10 −19 fractional uncertainty”. In:Physical Review Applied(2025). arXiv:2509.05964

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Clock with 8×10 −19 Systematic Uncertainty

    Alexander Aeppli et al. “Clock with 8×10 −19 Systematic Uncertainty”. In:Physical Review Letters 133 (2024), p. 023401.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.023401. arXiv:2403.10664

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.023401 2024

  57. [57]

    An 115In+–172Yb+ Coulomb Crystal Clock

    H. N. Hausser et al. “An 115In+–172Yb+ Coulomb Crystal Clock”. In:Physical Review Letters134 (2025), p. 023201.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.023201. arXiv:2402.16807

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.023201 2025

  58. [58]

    Transportable optical lattice clock with 2.1×10 −18 total uncertainty

    Nils Nosske et al. “Transportable optical lattice clock with 2.1×10 −18 total uncertainty”. In: (2025). arXiv:2507.14030

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Atomic clock performance enabling geodesy below the centimetre level

    William F. McGrew et al. “Atomic clock performance enabling geodesy below the centimetre level”. In:Nature564 (2018), pp. 87–90.doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0738-2. arXiv:1807.11282

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0738-2 2018

  60. [60]

    Single-Ion Atomic Clock with 3×10 −18 Systematic Uncertainty

    N. Huntemann et al. “Single-Ion Atomic Clock with 3×10 −18 Systematic Uncertainty”. In:Physical Review Letters116 (2016), p. 063001.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett . 116 . 063001. arXiv:1602 . 03908

    2016

  61. [61]

    Test of general relativity by a pair of transportable optical lattice clocks

    Masao Takamoto et al. “Test of general relativity by a pair of transportable optical lattice clocks”. In:Nature Photonics14 (2020), pp. 411–415.doi:10.1038/s41566-020-0619-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-020-0619-8 2020

  62. [62]

    Accurate, Traceable, and Verifiable Time Synchronization for World Financial Markets

    Michael A. Lombardi et al. “Accurate, Traceable, and Verifiable Time Synchronization for World Financial Markets”. In:Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 121 (2016), pp. 436–466.doi:10.6028/jres.121.023. 23 Quantum Protocols for Time Synchronisation and Distribution

    work page doi:10.6028/jres.121.023 2016

  63. [63]

    SENTINEL Project – Report on GNSS Vulnerabilities

    Charles Curry. “SENTINEL Project – Report on GNSS Vulnerabilities”. In: (2012). UK Technology Strategy Board. See also: The Economist, “Out of sight,” 27 July 2013.url:https://rntfnd. org/wp-content/uploads/SENTINEL-Project-Report.pdf

    2012

  64. [64]

    Lombardi.An Evaluation of Dependencies of Critical Infrastructure Timing Systems on the Global Positioning System (GPS)

    Michael A. Lombardi.An Evaluation of Dependencies of Critical Infrastructure Timing Systems on the Global Positioning System (GPS). NIST Technical Note 2189. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2021.doi:10.6028/NIST.TN.2189

    work page doi:10.6028/nist.tn.2189 2021

  65. [65]

    Hunting for topological dark matter with atomic clocks

    Andrei Derevianko and Maxim Pospelov. “Hunting for topological dark matter with atomic clocks”. In:Nature Physics10 (2014), pp. 933–936.doi:10.1038/nphys3137. arXiv:1311.1244

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3137 2014

  66. [66]

    Improved Limits on the Coupling of Ultralight Bosonic Dark Matter to Photons from Optical Atomic Clock Comparisons

    M. Filzinger et al. “Improved Limits on the Coupling of Ultralight Bosonic Dark Matter to Photons from Optical Atomic Clock Comparisons”. In:Physical Review Letters130 (2023), p. 253001.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.253001. arXiv:2301.03433

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.253001 2023

  67. [67]

    O’Donoughue.Emitter Detection and Geolocation for Electronic Warfare

    Nicholas A. O’Donoughue.Emitter Detection and Geolocation for Electronic Warfare. Artech House, 2019.isbn: 978-1-63081-564-6

    2019

  68. [68]

    Department of Defense.Global Positioning System Precise Positioning Service Performance Standard

    U.S. Department of Defense.Global Positioning System Precise Positioning Service Performance Standard. Tech. rep. Specifies UTC time transfer accuracy≤40 ns at 95% confidence. Department of Defense, 2007.url:https://www.gps.gov/performance-standards-specifications/

    2007

  69. [69]

    Phase Synchronization for Coherent MIMO Radar: Algorithms and Their Analysis

    Yang Yang and Rick S. Blum. “Phase Synchronization for Coherent MIMO Radar: Algorithms and Their Analysis”. In:IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing59.11 (2011), pp. 5538–5557.doi: 10.1109/TSP.2011.2162509. 24

    work page doi:10.1109/tsp.2011.2162509 2011