pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10552 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

The class C quantum network model with random tunneling and its nonlinear sigma model representation

D. S. Katkov , M. V. Parfenov , I. S. Burmistrov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords class C network modelspin quantum Hall effectnonlinear sigma modellarge-N limitrandom tunnelingtriplet modesZeeman fieldinversion symmetry
0
0 comments X

The pith

The class C quantum network model with random tunneling maps to a nonlinear sigma model in the large-N limit, with triplet modes typically massive except under specific conditions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper introduces a quantum network model with N channels per chiral link that preserves the symmetries of the spin quantum Hall effect and incorporates random tunneling. In the general case the triplet and singlet sectors remain coupled. Taking the large-N limit allows a systematic derivation of the long-distance low-energy effective theory, which is a nonlinear sigma model. Triplet modes are massive and decouple in most regimes but can become soft for particular tunneling asymmetries, which raises the ultraviolet cutoff of the effective theory. The authors also compute bare conductances to show that the saddle-point approximation breaks down when tunneling is strongly asymmetric between even and odd links, and they examine how a Zeeman field breaks SU(2) symmetry while generating an inversion-symmetry-violating term.

Core claim

We formulate a class C quantum network model consisting of N channels per chiral link preserving the fundamental symmetries of the spin quantum Hall effect. In the large-N limit we derive the effective long-distance low-energy field theory identified as a nonlinear sigma model. Triplet modes are typically massive and do not influence the large-N nonlinear sigma model, yet specific conditions exist where these modes become soft and thereby increase the ultraviolet cutoff length. The standard saddle-point approximation fails in regimes with significant tunneling asymmetry between even and odd links. Introduction of a Zeeman field breaks the SU(2) symmetry of the nonlinear sigma model action as

What carries the argument

The large-N saddle-point analysis that reduces the multi-channel network model to a nonlinear sigma model, with the singlet sector carrying the diffusive modes while the triplet sector decouples except when soft.

If this is right

  • Triplet modes remain massive and can be integrated out in generic tunneling regimes, leaving a standard nonlinear sigma model for the singlet sector.
  • Soft triplet modes appear only under specific tunneling conditions and raise the ultraviolet cutoff length of the effective theory.
  • Bare longitudinal and spin Hall conductances computed from the network model demonstrate the breakdown of the saddle-point method for strong even-odd tunneling asymmetry.
  • A Zeeman field explicitly breaks SU(2) invariance and adds a term that violates inversion symmetry in the nonlinear sigma model action.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The model supplies a controlled starting point for analytic study of the spin quantum Hall transition via the nonlinear sigma model.
  • Softening of triplet modes may alter the critical scaling near certain parameter values, offering a testable signature in conductance or localization length.
  • The framework could be extended to include weak interactions while retaining the large-N control over the diffusive modes.

Load-bearing premise

That the large-N limit can be taken while keeping the fundamental symmetries intact and that the saddle-point approximation remains valid outside the strongly asymmetric tunneling regime.

What would settle it

Direct numerical simulation of the network model at large but finite N that checks whether the localization length or conductance scaling matches the predictions of the derived nonlinear sigma model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10552 by D. S. Katkov, I. S. Burmistrov, M. V. Parfenov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Sketch of the quantum network model. Red and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Sketch of the renormalization group flow for class [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The spin quantum Hall effect is a relative of the integer quantum Hall effect, characterized by integer quantized spin Hall conductance. In this work, we formulate and investigate a quantum network model consisting of $\textsf{N}$ channels per chiral link, preserving the fundamental symmetries of the spin quantum Hall effect. We demonstrate that, in the general case, the triplet sector of the theory remains coupled to the singlet sector. In the large-$\textsf{N}$ limit, we systematically derive the effective long-distance, low-energy field theory, identified as a nonlinear sigma model. Our analysis reveals that while triplet modes are typically massive and do not influence the large-$\textsf{N}$ nonlinear sigma model, specific conditions exist where these modes become `soft', thereby increasing the ultraviolet cutoff length of the effective theory. Furthermore, by calculating the bare longitudinal and spin Hall conductances, we show that the standard saddle-point approximation fails in regimes with significant tunneling asymmetry between even and odd links. Finally, we establish that the introduction of a Zeeman field not only breaks the SU(2) symmetry of the nonlinear sigma model action but also generates a term that explicitly violates inversion symmetry.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript formulates an N-channel quantum network model preserving class-C symmetries of the spin quantum Hall effect. In general the triplet sector remains coupled to the singlet sector. In the large-N limit the effective long-distance low-energy theory is derived and identified as a nonlinear sigma model; triplet modes are typically massive but become soft under specific conditions, raising the ultraviolet cutoff. Bare longitudinal and spin Hall conductances are computed to demonstrate failure of the standard saddle-point approximation for significant tunneling asymmetry between even and odd links. A Zeeman field is shown to break SU(2) symmetry of the NLSM action and to generate an explicit inversion-symmetry-violating term.

Significance. If the large-N derivation is controlled, the work supplies a systematic field-theoretic framework for the class-C network model that can be used to analyze transport, localization, and symmetry-breaking effects in spin Hall systems. The explicit identification of soft triplet modes and the documented breakdown of the saddle-point under asymmetry are useful caveats that strengthen the applicability of the resulting NLSM.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and large-N analysis] Abstract and large-N derivation: the claim of a systematic large-N derivation of the NLSM is load-bearing, yet the manuscript notes that the saddle-point approximation fails precisely when tunneling asymmetry between even and odd links is significant. It is not stated whether the large-N limit is taken before or after this regime is encountered, nor whether 1/N corrections remain controlled there; this directly affects the reliability of the NLSM identification and the triplet-mode mass gap.
  2. [Bare conductances calculation] Bare conductances and triplet-mode section: the longitudinal and spin Hall conductances are used to diagnose saddle-point failure, but without an explicit expansion parameter, benchmark against small-N exact results, or alternative resummation shown for the asymmetric regime, the domain of validity of the subsequent NLSM remains unverified.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the number of channels (N versus textsf{N}) is inconsistent between the abstract and the body; a uniform convention should be adopted.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from a short table or paragraph summarizing the parameter regimes (symmetric vs. asymmetric tunneling, Zeeman strength) in which the NLSM is claimed to be valid.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, providing clarifications on the large-N procedure and the domain of the derived NLSM while remaining faithful to the content and limitations of the present work.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and large-N analysis] Abstract and large-N derivation: the claim of a systematic large-N derivation of the NLSM is load-bearing, yet the manuscript notes that the saddle-point approximation fails precisely when tunneling asymmetry between even and odd links is significant. It is not stated whether the large-N limit is taken before or after this regime is encountered, nor whether 1/N corrections remain controlled there; this directly affects the reliability of the NLSM identification and the triplet-mode mass gap.

    Authors: The large-N limit is taken with all tunneling amplitudes held fixed, including arbitrary asymmetry between even and odd links. The derivation proceeds by a systematic expansion of the replicated partition function for the N-channel network, followed by integration over fast degrees of freedom; the resulting effective action for the slow singlet modes is identified as the NLSM. The saddle-point failure diagnosed via the bare conductances is a separate diagnostic that signals when the simple mean-field estimate for transport coefficients becomes unreliable, but it does not invalidate the preceding large-N reduction itself. The triplet mass gap is computed directly within the same large-N saddle-point of the auxiliary-field formulation and remains positive except at the specific soft-mode loci already identified in the text. We acknowledge that an explicit analysis of 1/N corrections in the strongly asymmetric regime is not supplied; we will add a dedicated paragraph clarifying the order of limits and the regime of controlled expansion. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Bare conductances calculation] Bare conductances and triplet-mode section: the longitudinal and spin Hall conductances are used to diagnose saddle-point failure, but without an explicit expansion parameter, benchmark against small-N exact results, or alternative resummation shown for the asymmetric regime, the domain of validity of the subsequent NLSM remains unverified.

    Authors: The bare conductances are obtained from the same large-N saddle-point equations used to derive the NLSM; their unphysical behavior (negative or diverging values) for strong asymmetry serves as an internal consistency check that the saddle-point must be abandoned in that window. The NLSM itself is obtained by retaining the full fluctuation spectrum around the large-N saddle, so its validity is tied to the existence of a finite triplet mass gap rather than to the accuracy of the conductance formulas. No explicit 1/N expansion parameter beyond the formal large-N counting, no small-N benchmarks, and no resummation are presented. We will expand the discussion of the validity window (moderate asymmetry, gapped triplets) but cannot supply the requested benchmarks within the present analytical framework. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Providing small-N exact results or alternative resummation techniques for the strongly asymmetric regime, as these would require separate numerical or non-perturbative calculations outside the scope of the current large-N analytic treatment.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: large-N derivation of NLSM is independent of its outputs

full rationale

The paper formulates an N-channel class-C network model and performs a large-N saddle-point analysis to obtain the effective NLSM, with triplet modes shown massive except under specific tunneling asymmetry. Bare conductances are computed to diagnose saddle-point failure in asymmetric regimes, but this diagnostic step does not feed back into the derivation itself; the NLSM identification rests on the explicit large-N expansion rather than on any fitted parameter or self-citation that presupposes the final result. No self-definitional loops, renamed known results, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard symmetry assumptions of the spin quantum Hall effect and the validity of the large-N saddle-point procedure; no new particles or forces are postulated, but the soft-mode condition and tunneling asymmetry are introduced as model features.

free parameters (1)
  • N (number of channels)
    Taken to infinity for the effective theory; the finite-N corrections are not derived.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The network model preserves the fundamental symmetries of the spin quantum Hall effect (class C).
    Invoked in the first sentence of the abstract to define the model.
  • domain assumption Triplet modes can be integrated out when massive in the large-N limit.
    Central to identifying the NLSM; stated as typical behavior.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5519 in / 1454 out tokens · 61834 ms · 2026-05-10T16:08:28.128631+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The case of the nearest neighbouring tunneling We begin with the tridiagonal matrix𝛽 (𝑎) introduced in Eq. (21). For the singlet sector, the determinant of 14 the𝑀×𝑀matrix𝛽 (0) can be written as det𝛽 (0) 𝑀 =𝑑 𝑀 = ⃒⃒⃒⃒⃒⃒⃒⃒⃒⃒ 3 2 𝑚 𝜆 + 0 0. . . 𝜆+ 3 2 𝑚 𝜆 − 0. . . 0𝜆 − 3 2 𝑚 𝜆 + . . . 0 0𝜆 + 3 2 𝑚 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ⃒⃒⃒⃒⃒⃒⃒⃒⃒⃒ .(B1) Using s...

    work page

  2. [2]

    It is convenient to introduce 𝛽𝑛 =𝛽 (+) 𝑛 +𝛽 (−) 𝑛 and𝛿 𝑛 = (𝛽(+) 𝑛 −𝛽 (−) 𝑛 )/(𝛽(+) 𝑛 +𝛽 (−) 𝑛 ), so that|𝛿 𝑛|⩽1

    T unneling matrix of a general form We now consider a general tunneling matrix𝛽 (𝑎) 𝑗𝑘 cor- responding to the function 𝛽(𝑘) =𝛽 0 + ∞∑︁ 𝑛=1 (︁ 𝛽(+) 𝑛 𝑒−𝑖𝑘𝑛 +𝛽 (−) 𝑛 𝑒𝑖𝑘𝑛 )︁ ,(B8) with𝛽 (±) 𝑛 >0 and𝛽 0 >0. It is convenient to introduce 𝛽𝑛 =𝛽 (+) 𝑛 +𝛽 (−) 𝑛 and𝛿 𝑛 = (𝛽(+) 𝑛 −𝛽 (−) 𝑛 )/(𝛽(+) 𝑛 +𝛽 (−) 𝑛 ), so that|𝛿 𝑛|⩽1. Let us assume that the diagonal elemen...

    work page

  3. [3]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev.109, 1492 (1958)

    work page 1958

  4. [4]

    Evers, A

    F. Evers, A. Mildenberger, and A. D. Mirlin, Multi- fractality at the quantum Hall transition: Beyond the parabolic paradigm, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 116803 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological quantum matter with sym- metries, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035005 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    E. P. Wigner, On a class of analytic functions from the quantum theory of collisions, Ann. Math.53, 36 (1951)

    work page 1951

  7. [7]

    F. J. Dyson, Statistical theory of the energy levels of complex systems. I, J. Math. Phys.3, 140 (1962)

    work page 1962

  8. [8]

    F. J. Dyson, The threefold way. algebraic structure of symmetry groups and ensembles in quantum mechanics, J. Math. Phys.3, 2299 (1962)

    work page 1962

  9. [9]

    M. R. Zirnbauer, Riemannian symmetric superspaces and their origin in random-matrix theory, J. Math. Phys.37, 4986 (1996)

    work page 1996

  10. [10]

    Altland and M

    A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Nonstandard symme- try classes in mesoscopic normal-superconducting hybrid structures, Phys. Rev. B55, 1142 (1997)

    work page 1997

  11. [11]

    Heinzner, A

    P. Heinzner, A. Huckleberry, and M. R. Zirnbauer, Sym- metry classes of disordered fermions, Commun. Math. Phys.257, 725 (2005)

    work page 2005

  12. [12]

    A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Classification of topological insulators and super- conductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B78, 195125 (2008)

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Classification of topological insulators and supercon- ductors, AIP Conf. Proc.1134, 10 (2009)

    work page 2009

  14. [14]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors, AIP Conf. Proc.1134, 22 (2009)

    work page 2009

  15. [15]

    von Klitzing, G

    K. von Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine-structure con- stant based on quantized Hall resistance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 494 (1980)

    work page 1980

  16. [16]

    D. C. Tsui and A. C. Gossard, Resistance standard using qunatization of the Hall resistance of GaAs-Al 𝑥Ga1−𝑥As heterostructures, Appl. Phys. Lett.38, 550 (1981)

    work page 1981

  17. [17]

    M. R. Zirnbauer, Conformal field theory of the integer quantum Hall plateau transition,https://doi.org/10. 48550/arXiv.hep-th/9905054(1999)

    work page arXiv 1999

  18. [18]

    Kettemann and A

    S. Kettemann and A. M. Tsvelik, Information about the integer quantum Hall transition extracted from the auto- correlation function of spectral determinants, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 3689 (1999)

    work page 1999

  19. [19]

    M. J. Bhaseen, I. I. Kogan, O. A. Soloviev, N. Taniguchi, and A. M. Tsvelik, Towards a field theory of the plateau transitions in the integer quantum Hall effect, Nucl. Phys. B580, 688 (2000)

    work page 2000

  20. [20]

    A. M. Tsvelik, Wave functions statistics at quantum Hall critical point,https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/ 0112008(2001)

    work page 2001

  21. [21]

    A. M. Tsvelik, Evidence for the PSL(2|2) Wess-Zumino- Novikov-Witten model as a model for the plateau transi- tion in the quantum Hall effect: Evaluation of numerical simulations, Phys. Rev. B75, 184201 (2007)

    work page 2007

  22. [22]

    Bondesan, D

    R. Bondesan, D. Wieczorek, and M. Zirnbauer, Gaussian free fields at the integer quantum Hall plateau transition, Nucl. Phys. B918, 52 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    M. R. Zirnbauer, The integer quantum Hall plateau tran- sition is a current algebra after all, Nucl. Phys. B941, 458 (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    M. R. Zirnbauer, Marginal CFT perturbations at the in- teger quantum Hall transition, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)431, 168559 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    M. R. Zirnbauer, On the infrared limit of the o(3) non- linear𝜎-model at𝜃=𝜋,https://arxiv.org/abs/2408. 12215(2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    J. F. Karcher, N. Charles, I. A. Gruzberg, and A. D. Mirlin, Generalized multifractality at spin quantum Hall transition, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)435, 168584 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Padayasi and I

    J. Padayasi and I. Gruzberg, Conformal invariance and multifractality at Anderson transitions in arbitrary di- mensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 266401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Obuse, A

    H. Obuse, A. R. Subramaniam, A. Furusaki, I. A. Gruzberg, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Boundary multifractal- ity at the integer quantum Hall plateau transition: Im- plications for the critical theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 116802 (2008)

    work page 2008

  29. [29]

    I. A. Gruzberg, A. Kl¨ umper, W. Nuding, and A. Se- drakyan, Geometrically disordered network models, quenched quantum gravity, and critical behavior at quan- tum Hall plateau transitions, Phys. Rev. B95, 125414 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Kl¨ umper, W

    A. Kl¨ umper, W. Nuding, and A. Sedrakyan, Random network models with variable disorder of geometry, Phys. Rev. B100, 140201(R) (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Conti, H

    R. Conti, H. Topchyan, R.Tateo, and A. Sedrakyan, Geometry of random potentials: Induction of two- dimensional gravity in quantum Hall plateau transitions, Phys. Rev. B103, L041302 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    E. J. Dresselhaus, B. Sbierski, and I. A. Gruzberg, Scal- ing collapse of longitudinal conductance near the integer quantum Hall transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 026801 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Topchyan, I

    H. Topchyan, I. Gruzberg, W. Nuding, A. Kl¨ umper, and A. Sedrakyan, The integer quantum Hall transition: an S-matrix approach to random networks, Phys. Rev. B 110, L081112 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Mac´ ıas, I

    E. Mac´ ıas, I. Gruzberg, and E. Bettelheim, Spin quantum Hall transition on random networks: Exact critical ex- ponents via quantum gravity,https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2601.22639(2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    Levine, S

    H. Levine, S. B. Libby, and A. M. M. Pruisken, Elec- tron delocalization by a magnetic field in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 1915 (1983). 16

    work page 1915

  36. [36]

    A. M. M. Pruisken, On localization in the theory of the quantized Hall effect: A two-dimensional realization of the𝜃-vacuum, Nucl. Phys. B235, 277 (1984)

    work page 1984

  37. [37]

    Khmel’nitskii, Quantization of Hall conductivity, JETP Lett.38, 552 (1983)

    D. Khmel’nitskii, Quantization of Hall conductivity, JETP Lett.38, 552 (1983)

    work page 1983

  38. [38]

    A. M. M. Pruisken, Dilute instanton gas as the precursor of the integer quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B32, 2636 (1985)

    work page 1985

  39. [39]

    A. M. M. Pruisken, Quasiparticles in the theory of the integral quantum Hall effect (I), Nucl. Phys. B285, 719 (1987)

    work page 1987

  40. [40]

    A. M. M. Pruisken, Quasiparticles in the theory of the integral quantum Hall effect (II). Renormalization of the Hall conductance or instanton angle theta, Nucl. Phys. B290, 61 (1987)

    work page 1987

  41. [41]

    A. M. M. Pruisken and M. A. Baranov, Cracking Coulomb interactions in the quantum Hall regime, Eu- rophysics Lett.31, 543 (1995)

    work page 1995

  42. [42]

    Pruisken and I

    A. Pruisken and I. Burmistrov, The instanton vacuum of generalized CP 𝑁−1 models, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)316, 285 (2005)

    work page 2005

  43. [43]

    A. M. M. Pruisken and I. S. Burmistrov,𝜃renormaliza- tion, electron–electron interactions and super universal- ity in the quantum Hall regime, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)322, 1265 (2007)

    work page 2007

  44. [44]

    H. P. Wei, D. C. Tsui, M. A. Paalanen, and A. M. M. Pruisken, Experiments on delocalization and university in the integral quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 1294 (1988)

    work page 1988

  45. [45]

    S. Koch, R. J. Haug, K. v. Klitzing, and K. Ploog, Size- dependent analysis of the metal-insulator transition in the integral quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 883 (1991)

    work page 1991

  46. [46]

    R. T. F. van Schaijk, A. de Visser, S. M. Olsthoorn, H. P. Wei, and A. M. M. Pruisken, Probing the plateau- insulator quantum phase transition in the quantum Hall regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 1567 (2000)

    work page 2000

  47. [47]

    W. Li, G. A. Cs´ athy, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Scaling and universality of integer quantum Hall plateau-to-plateau transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 206807 (2005)

    work page 2005

  48. [48]

    Pruisken, D

    A. Pruisken, D. de Lang, L. Ponomarenko, and A. de Visser, Universal scaling results for the plateau–insulator transition in the quantum Hall regime, Solid State Com- munications137, 540 (2006)

    work page 2006

  49. [49]

    W. Li, C. L. Vicente, J. S. Xia, W. Pan, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Scaling in plateau-to-plateau transition: A direct connection of quantum Hall systems with the Anderson localization model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 216801 (2009)

    work page 2009

  50. [50]

    W. Li, J. S. Xia, C. Vicente, N. S. Sullivan, W. Pan, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Crossover from the nonuniversal scaling regime to the universal scaling regime in quantum Hall plateau transitions, Phys. Rev. B81, 033305 (2010)

    work page 2010

  51. [51]

    P. T. Madathil, K. A. Villegas Rosales, C. T. Tai, Y. J. Chung, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, K. W. Baldwin, and M. Shayegan, Delocalization and universality of the fractional quantum Hall plateau-to-plateau transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 226503 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    S. Kaur, T. Chanda, K. R. Amin, D. Sahani, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, U. Ghorai, Y. Gefen, G. J. Sreejith, and A. Bid, Universality of quantum phase transitions in the integer and fractional quantum Hall regimes, Nature Communications15, 8535 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Yeh, P.-C

    C.-C. Yeh, P.-C. Liao, Y. Yang, W.-C. Lin, A. R. Panna, A. F. Rigosi, R. E. Elmquist, and C.-T. Liang, Confor- mity experiment on inelastic scattering exponent of elec- trons in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 096302 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Volovik, On edge states in superconductors with time inversion symmetry breaking, JETP Lett.66, 522 (1997)

    G. Volovik, On edge states in superconductors with time inversion symmetry breaking, JETP Lett.66, 522 (1997)

    work page 1997

  55. [55]

    Kagalovsky, B

    V. Kagalovsky, B. Horovitz, Y. Avishai, and J. T. Chalker, Quantum Hall plateau transitions in disordered superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 3516 (1999)

    work page 1999

  56. [56]

    Senthil, J

    T. Senthil, J. B. Marston, and M. P. A. Fisher, Spin quantum Hall effect in unconventional superconductors, Phys. Rev. B60, 4245 (1999)

    work page 1999

  57. [57]

    G. E. Volovik and V. M. Yakovenko, Fractional charge, spin and statistics of solitons in superfluid 3He film, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter1, 5263 (1989)

    work page 1989

  58. [58]

    G. E. Volovik, A. Solov’ev, and V. M. Yakovenko, Spin and statistics of soliton in a superfluid3He-A film, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.49, 55 (1989)

    work page 1989

  59. [59]

    Evers, Relaxation on critical percolation clusters, self- avoiding random walks, and the quantum Hall effect, Phys

    F. Evers, Relaxation on critical percolation clusters, self- avoiding random walks, and the quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. E55, 2321 (1997)

    work page 1997

  60. [60]

    I. A. Gruzberg, A. W. W. Ludwig, and N. Read, Exact exponents for the spin quantum Hall transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 4524 (1999)

    work page 1999

  61. [61]

    Cardy, Linking numbers for self-avoiding loops and percolation: Application to the spin quantum Hall tran- sition, Phys

    J. Cardy, Linking numbers for self-avoiding loops and percolation: Application to the spin quantum Hall tran- sition, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 3507 (2000)

    work page 2000

  62. [62]

    E. J. Beamond, J. Cardy, and J. T. Chalker, Quantum and classical localization, the spin quantum Hall effect, and generalizations, Phys. Rev. B65, 214301 (2002)

    work page 2002

  63. [63]

    A. D. Mirlin, F. Evers, and A. Mildenberger, Wavefunc- tion statistics and multifractality at the spin quantum Hall transition, J. Phys. A: Math. and Gen.36, 3255 (2003)

    work page 2003

  64. [64]

    Evers, A

    F. Evers, A. Mildenberger, and A. D. Mirlin, Multifrac- tality at the spin quantum Hall transition, Phys. Rev. B 67, 041303 (2003)

    work page 2003

  65. [65]

    A. R. Subramaniam, I. A. Gruzberg, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Boundary criticality and multifractality at the two- dimensional spin quantum Hall transition, Phys. Rev. B 78, 245105 (2008)

    work page 2008

  66. [66]

    Puschmann, D

    M. Puschmann, D. Hernang´ omez-P´ erez, B. Lang, S. Bera, and F. Evers, Quartic multifractality and finite- size corrections at the spin quantum Hall transition, Phys. Rev. B103, 235167 (2021)

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    J. F. Karcher, I. A. Gruzberg, and A. D. Mirlin, General- ized multifractality at the spin quantum Hall transition: Percolation mapping and pure-scaling observables, Phys. Rev. B105, 184205 (2022)

    work page 2022

  68. [68]

    J. F. Karcher, I. A. Gruzberg, and A. D. Mirlin, General- ized multifractality at metal-insulator transitions and in metallic phases of two-dimensional disordered systems, Phys. Rev. B106, 104202 (2022)

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    J. F. Karcher, I. A. Gruzberg, and A. D. Mirlin, Metal- insulator transition in a two-dimensional system of chiral unitary class, Phys. Rev. B107, L020201 (2023)

    work page 2023

  70. [70]

    J. F. Karcher, I. A. Gruzberg, and A. D. Mirlin, Gener- alized multifractality in two-dimensional disordered sys- tems of chiral symmetry classes, Phys. Rev. B107, 104202 (2023)

    work page 2023

  71. [71]

    M. V. Parfenov and I. S. Burmistrov, Instanton analysis for the spin quantum Hall symmetry class: Nonperturba- 17 tive corrections to physical observables and generalized multifractal spectrum, Phys. Rev. B110, 165431 (2024)

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    M. V. Parfenov and I. S. Burmistrov, Bulk-edge cor- respondence at the spin-to-integer quantum Hall effect crossover in topological superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 112, L161407 (2025)

    work page 2025

  73. [73]

    J. T. Chalker and P. D. Coddington, Percolation, quan- tum tunneling and the integer quantum Hall effect, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.21, 2665 (1988)

    work page 1988

  74. [74]

    Slevin and T

    K. Slevin and T. Ohtsuki, Finite size scaling of the Chalker-Coddington model, Int. J. Mod. Phys.: Conf. Series11, 60 (2012)

    work page 2012

  75. [75]

    M. R. Zirnbauer, Toward a theory of the integer quan- tum Hall transition: Continuum limit of the Chalker- Coddington model, J. Math. Phys.38, 2007 (1997)

    work page 2007

  76. [76]

    A. Davis, Supersymmetry method for network models of quantum Hall transitions and hybrid structures, PhD Thesis,https://etd.ohiolink.edu/acprod/odb_etd/ ws/send_file/send?accession=osu1566157715556164& disposition=inline(2019)

    work page 2019

  77. [77]

    Lee, Network models of quantum percolation and their field-theory representations, Phys

    D.-H. Lee, Network models of quantum percolation and their field-theory representations, Phys. Rev. B50, 10788 (1998)

    work page 1998

  78. [78]

    Evers and A

    F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Anderson transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1355 (2008)

    work page 2008

  79. [79]

    Senthil and M

    T. Senthil and M. P. A. Fisher, Quasiparticle localization in superconductors with spin-orbit scattering, Phys. Rev. B61, 9690 (2000)

    work page 2000

  80. [80]

    M. V. Feigel’man, A. I. Larkin, and M. A. Skvortsov, Keldysh action for disordered superconductors, Phys. Rev. B61, 12361 (2000)

    work page 2000

Showing first 80 references.