pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10612 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Two-Dimensional Spin-Antiferroelectric Altermagnets with Giant Spin Splitting: From Model to Material Realization

Zesen Fu , Aolin Li , Wenzhe Zhou , Fangping Ouyang , Fawei Zheng , Yugui Yao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords 2D altermagnetsspin-antiferroelectricmultiferroicsspin splittinggate controlmonolayer (CoCl)2Tespintronicselectrical switching
0
0 comments X

The pith

A design strategy identifies monolayer (CoCl)2Te as a 2D spin-AFEAM where gate fields control giant spin splitting and spin currents.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a new class of two-dimensional multiferroic altermagnets called spin-antiferroelectric altermagnets (2D spin-AFEAMs) that combine antiferroelectric order with altermagnetic spin splitting to permit electrical control of spin polarization. It outlines a general design strategy aimed at producing large intrinsic spin splitting in such systems and applies the strategy to predict that monolayer (CoCl)2Te and its family materials will realize this behavior. In the predicted material, spin current switches with the angle of an in-plane electric field under hole doping and with the polarity of a gate field under electron doping. This mechanism would allow purely electric operation of spintronic functions in atomically thin layers.

Core claim

The paper introduces 2D spin-AFEAMs by combining the spin-antiferroelectric concept with altermagnetism, which enables electrical control of spin polarization through a gate field. Following a proposed design strategy for large intrinsic spin splitting, the authors predict that monolayer (CoCl)2Te exhibits this property together with a highly tunable transport regime in which spin current direction responds to in-plane electric field angle when hole-doped and to gate field polarity when electron-doped.

What carries the argument

The spin-antiferroelectric altermagnetic order, which couples electric polarization to the orientation of spin-split bands so that a gate field can reorient or reverse the spin current.

If this is right

  • Electrical control of spin polarization via gate field becomes available in a class of 2D altermagnets.
  • Spin current in hole-doped monolayer (CoCl)2Te reverses with the orientation of an in-plane electric field.
  • Spin current in electron-doped monolayer (CoCl)2Te reverses with the sign of the applied gate field.
  • Related compounds in the (CoCl)2Te family can host giant intrinsic spin splitting for spintronic use.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same design approach might be tested in other layered transition-metal halides to widen the set of electrically switchable altermagnets.
  • If the tunability survives room temperature, the material could serve as a platform for doping-dependent spin logic gates in 2D heterostructures.
  • Connecting the predicted switching to existing 2D ferroelectric substrates could produce hybrid devices that combine permanent polarization with gate-tunable spin response.

Load-bearing premise

The general design strategy for producing large intrinsic spin splitting in 2D spin-AFEAMs will survive in real, defect-free monolayer materials without additional interactions that reduce the splitting or erase the predicted electrical tunability.

What would settle it

Angle-resolved photoemission or gate-dependent transport measurements on monolayer (CoCl)2Te that find no giant spin splitting or no switching of spin current with in-plane field angle or gate polarity would falsify the central prediction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10612 by Aolin Li, Fangping Ouyang, Fawei Zheng, Wenzhe Zhou, Yugui Yao, Zesen Fu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic illustration of the spin-AFEAM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) and (b): Atomic structure of monolayer (CoCl) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Calculated Boltzmann conductivity as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The realization of multiferroic altermagnets featuring giant intrinsic spin splitting, hold great promise for next-generation spintronics. In this work, based on the recently proposed concept of spin-antiferroelectric (spin-AFE), we construct a class of two-dimensional (2D) multiferroic altermagnets, termed 2D spin-antiferroelectric altermagnets (2D spin-AFEAMs), enabling electrical control of spin polarization via a gate field. Furthermore, we propose a general design strategy for constructing 2D spin-AFEAMs with large intrinsic spin splitting. Guided by this strategy, we predict monolayer $(\mathrm{CoCl})_2\mathrm{Te}$ and its family materials as potential candidates of 2D spin-AFEAM. We uncover a highly tunable transport regime in monolayer $(\mathrm{CoCl})_2\mathrm{Te}$, where the spin current can be switched via the in-plane electric field angle when hole-doped, and via the gate field polarity when electron-doped. Our work enriches the family of 2D multiferroics and provides a blueprint for realizing high-performance, electrically switchable altermagnetic spintronic devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces 2D spin-antiferroelectric altermagnets (2D spin-AFEAMs) as a class of multiferroic altermagnets that combine altermagnetic order with antiferroelectricity, enabling gate-field control of spin polarization. It develops a general design strategy for realizing large intrinsic spin splitting in such 2D systems and identifies monolayer (CoCl)2Te and related compounds as candidate materials. The work further reports a tunable spin-transport regime in (CoCl)2Te in which spin current can be switched by the angle of an in-plane electric field under hole doping and by gate-field polarity under electron doping.

Significance. If the central predictions are confirmed, the work would expand the catalog of 2D multiferroics and supply a concrete design route toward electrically switchable altermagnetic spintronic devices. The explicit mapping from a model-based design strategy to specific material candidates is a positive feature, as is the demonstration of doping-dependent electrical tunability. The overall significance remains conditional on verification that the predicted orders and splitting survive realistic 2D perturbations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Material Realization and Candidate Screening] The central claim that monolayer (CoCl)2Te realizes a stable 2D spin-AFEAM with giant spin splitting and the reported electrical tunability rests on the persistence of altermagnetic and antiferroelectric order in the free-standing monolayer. No phonon-dispersion calculations, molecular-dynamics simulations, or defect-formation-energy results are provided to establish dynamical stability or robustness against vacancies, strain, or substrate charge transfer; this omission directly affects the load-bearing material-realization step.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to “its family materials” without naming the additional compounds; a brief enumeration or chemical formula list would improve clarity.
  2. [Introduction and Model Section] Notation for the spin-AFEAM order parameter and the definition of the in-plane electric-field angle should be introduced explicitly on first use in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and for recognizing the potential of 2D spin-AFEAMs for electrically switchable spintronics. We address the single major comment on material realization below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional stability analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that monolayer (CoCl)2Te realizes a stable 2D spin-AFEAM with giant spin splitting and the reported electrical tunability rests on the persistence of altermagnetic and antiferroelectric order in the free-standing monolayer. No phonon-dispersion calculations, molecular-dynamics simulations, or defect-formation-energy results are provided to establish dynamical stability or robustness against vacancies, strain, or substrate charge transfer; this omission directly affects the load-bearing material-realization step.

    Authors: We agree that dynamical stability is essential to support the material candidate claim. Our calculations optimize the monolayer geometry and compute its electronic, magnetic, and ferroelectric properties within DFT, showing robust altermagnetic order and giant spin splitting. In the revised manuscript we will add phonon dispersion calculations for monolayer (CoCl)2Te to confirm the absence of imaginary frequencies and thereby establish dynamical stability. We will also expand the discussion to address robustness, noting the sizable cohesive energy and structural analogy to experimentally realized 2D materials. For substrate charge transfer we will link the already-present doping-dependent transport results to possible charge-transfer effects. Comprehensive molecular-dynamics simulations and quantitative defect-formation energies for vacancies and strain, however, lie outside the scope of the present design-focused study and are better suited to dedicated follow-up work. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Comprehensive molecular-dynamics simulations and quantitative defect-formation-energy calculations to quantify robustness against vacancies, strain, and substrate charge transfer.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation proceeds from external concept to explicit model construction and material prediction without reducing to self-defined inputs

full rationale

The paper starts from the externally proposed spin-AFE concept, constructs an explicit 2D spin-AFEAM model with stated design rules for giant spin splitting, then applies those rules to identify candidate materials such as monolayer (CoCl)2Te and computes its transport properties under doping and gating. No step equates a fitted parameter to a prediction by construction, renames a known result, or relies on a load-bearing self-citation whose validity is presupposed rather than independently verifiable. The central claims remain falsifiable via first-principles calculations or experiment outside the fitted values used in the present work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review limited to abstract; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The central claim rests on the recently proposed spin-AFE concept and an unspecified design strategy whose internal assumptions cannot be audited here.

invented entities (1)
  • 2D spin-AFEAM no independent evidence
    purpose: Class of materials enabling electrical control of giant spin splitting in altermagnets
    Introduced as a new category based on spin-antiferroelectric order; no independent falsifiable evidence supplied in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5538 in / 1342 out tokens · 43215 ms · 2026-05-10T16:19:00.436684+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kimura, T

    T. Kimura, T. Goto, H. Shintani, K. Ishizaka, T. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Magnetic control of ferroelectric polar- ization, Nature426, 55–58 (2003)

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    Schmid, Multi-ferroic magnetoelectrics, Ferroelectrics 162, 317 (1994)

    H. Schmid, Multi-ferroic magnetoelectrics, Ferroelectrics 162, 317 (1994)

    work page 1994

  3. [3]

    Dong, J.-M

    S. Dong, J.-M. Liu, S.-W. Cheong, and Z. Ren, Multifer- roic materials and magnetoelectric physics: symmetry, entanglement, excitation, and topology, Adv. Phys.64, 519 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    S. Dong, H. Xiang, and E. Dagotto, Magnetoelectricity in multiferroics: a theoretical perspective, Natl. Sci. Rev. 6, 629 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    N. A. Spaldin and R. Ramesh, Advances in magnetoelec- tric multiferroics, Nat. Mater.18, 203 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Fiebig, T

    M. Fiebig, T. Lottermoser, D. Meier, and M. Trassin, The evolution of multiferroics, Nat. Rev. Mater.1, 16046 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Eerenstein, N

    W. Eerenstein, N. D. Mathur, and J. F. Scott, Multi- ferroic and magnetoelectric materials, Nature442, 759 (2006)

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    N. A. Hill, Why are there so few magnetic ferroelectrics?, J. Phys. Chem. B104, 6694 (2000)

    work page 2000

  9. [9]

    N. A. Spaldin, Multiferroics: Past, present, and future, MRS Bulletin42, 385 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    A. Jain, Y. Wang, A. Kumar, N. Gupta, K. Kumar, and A. K. Goyal, Bifeo3-based lead-free materials: Recent breakthroughs and their multifunctional applications, J. Alloys Compd.1010, 177170 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    B. Yu, L. Huang, J. S. Li, L. Lin, V. Ovidiu Garlea, Q. Zhang, T. Zou, J. C. Zhang, J. Peng, Y. S. Tang, G. Z. Zhou, J. H. Zhang, S. H. Zheng, M. F. Liu, Z. B. Yan, X. H. Zhou, S. Dong, J. G. Wan, and J.-M. Liu, Magnetic structure and magnetoelectric coupling in the antiferro- magnet co5(TeO3)4cl2, Phys. Rev. B109, 184106 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Van Aken, T

    B. Van Aken, T. Palstra, A. Filippetti, and N. Spaldin, The origin of ferroelectricity in magnetoelectric ymno3, Nat. Mater.3, 164 (2004)

    work page 2004

  13. [13]

    J. Wang, J. Neaton, H. Zheng, V. Nagarajan, S. Ogale, B. Liu, D. Viehland, V. Vaithyanathan, D. Schlom, U. Waghmare, N. Spaldin, K. Rabe, M. Wuttig, and R. Ramesh, Epitaxial bifeo3 multiferroic thin film het- erostructures, Science299, 1719 (2003)

    work page 2003

  14. [14]

    Shao, S.-H

    D.-F. Shao, S.-H. Zhang, M. Li, C.-B. Eom, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Spin-neutral currents for spintronics, Nat. Commun.12, 7061 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Gurung, M

    G. Gurung, M. Elekhtiar, Q.-Q. Luo, D.-F. Shao, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Nearly perfect spin polarization of non- collinear antiferromagnets, Nat. Commun.15, 10242 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [17]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [18]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [19]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nat. Commun.12, 2846 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [20]

    Tang, S.-J

    C.-P. Tang, S.-J. Xiong, W.-J. Shi, and J. Cao, Two-dimensional pentagonal crystals and possible spin- polarized dirac dispersion relations, J. Appl. Phys.115, 113702 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [21]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88, 123702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [22]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-zantiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [23]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K. V´ yborn´ y, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. c. v. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn´ y, Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativis- 7 tic collinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 127701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [24]

    Krempasky, L

    J. Krempasky, L. Smejkal, S. W. D’Souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhlirova, F. Alarab, P. C. Constanti- nou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov, W. R. Pudelko, R. Gonzalez- Hernandez, A. B. Hellenes, Z. Jansa, H. Reichlova, Z. Soban, R. D. G. Betancourt, P. Wadley, J. Sinova, D. Kriegner, J. Minar, J. H. Dil, and T. Jungwirth, Al- termagnetic lifting of kramers ...

    work page 2024

  24. [25]

    Osumi, S

    T. Osumi, S. Souma, T. Aoyama, K. Yamauchi, A. Honma, K. Nakayama, T. Takahashi, K. Ohgushi, and T. Sato, Observation of a giant band splitting in alter- magnetic mnte, Phys. Rev. B109, 115102 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [26]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. ˇSmejkal, C.-J. Kang, and C. Kim, Broken kramers degeneracy in altermagnetic mnte, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [27]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. Smejkal, V. N. Stro- cov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. J. Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty, T. Denneulin, W. Shi, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, S. Das, M. Klaeui, J. Sinova, and M. Jourdan, Direct observa- tion of altermagnetic band splitting in crsb thin films, Nat. Commun.15, 2116 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [28]

    J. Ding, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Tao, Z. Liu, T. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, J. Cheng, J. Liu, Y. Yang, R. Zhang, L. Deng, W. Jing, Y. Huang, Y. Shi, M. Ye, S. Qiao, Y. Wang, Y. Guo, D. Feng, and D. Shen, Large band splitting in g-wave altermagnet crsb, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [29]

    G. Yang, Z. Li, S. Yang, J. Li, H. Zheng, W. Zhu, Z. Pan, Y. Xu, S. Cao, W. Zhao, A. Jana, J. Zhang, M. Ye, Y. Song, L.-H. Hu, L. Yang, J. Fujii, I. Vobornik, M. Shi, H. Yuan, Y. Zhang, Y. Xu, and Y. Liu, Three- dimensional mapping of the altermagnetic spin splitting in crsb, Nat. Commun.16, 1442 (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [30]

    C. Wu, K. Sun, E. Fradkin, and S.-C. Zhang, Fermi liquid instabilities in the spin channel, Phys. Rev. B75, 115103 (2007)

    work page 2007

  30. [31]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Mo- tome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic an- tiferromagnets, Nat. Commun.10, 4305 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [32]

    A. Bose, N. J. Schreiber, R. Jain, D.-F. Shao, H. P. Nair, J. Sun, X. S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, E. Y. Tsymbal, D. G. Schlom, and D. C. Ralph, Tilted spin current generated by the collinear antiferromagnet ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron.5, 267 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [33]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Y. Feng, Y. J. Zhou, R. X. Su, Q. Wang, L. Y. Liao, W. X. Zhu, X. Z. Chen, F. Pan, X. L. Fan, and C. Song, Observation of spin splitting torque in a collinear antiferromagnet RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 197202 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [34]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Observation of spin-splitter torque in collinear antiferromagnetic RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 137201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [35]

    Fedchenko, J

    O. Fedchenko, J. Min´ ar, A. Akashdeep, S. W. D’Souza, D. Vasilyev, O. Tkach, L. Odenbreit, Q. Nguyen, D. Kut- nyakhov, N. Wind, L. Wenthaus, M. Scholz, K. Ross- nagel, M. Hoesch, M. Aeschlimann, B. Stadtm¨ uller, M. Kl¨ aui, G. Sch¨ onhense, T. Jungwirth, A. B. Hellenes, G. Jakob, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and H.-J. Elmers, Ob- servation of time-reversal s...

    work page 2024

  35. [36]

    Zhu, Z.-Y

    D. Zhu, Z.-Y. Zhuang, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Topological superconductivity in two-dimensional altermagnetic met- als, Phys. Rev. B108, 184505 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [37]

    Brekke, A

    B. Brekke, A. Brataas, and A. Sudbø, Two-dimensional altermagnets: Superconductivity in a minimal micro- scopic model, Phys. Rev. B108, 224421 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [38]

    S. A. A. Ghorashi, T. L. Hughes, and J. Cano, Altermag- netic routes to majorana modes in zero net magnetiza- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 106601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [39]

    Aoyama and K

    T. Aoyama and K. Ohgushi, Piezomagnetic properties in altermagnetic mnte, Phys. Rev. Mater.8, L041402 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [40]

    D. S. Antonenko, R. M. Fernandes, and J. W. F. Vender- bos, Mirror chern bands and weyl nodal loops in alter- magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 096703 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [41]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv.6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [42]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Mo- tome, and H. Seo, Anomalous hall effect inκ-type organic antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B102, 075112 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [43]

    Z. Fu, M. Hu, A. Li, H. Duan, J. Liu, and F. Ouyang, Multiple topological phases controlled via strain in two- dimensional altermagnets, arXiv:2507.22474

    work page arXiv

  43. [44]

    C. Li, M. Hu, Z. Li, Y. Wang, W. Chen, B. Thiagarajan, M. Leandersson, C. Polley, T. Kim, H. Liu,et al., Topo- logical weyl altermagnetism in CrSb, Commun. Phys.8, 311 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [45]

    Y. Chen, X. Liu, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Electri- cal switching of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 016701 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [46]

    Lin, S.-B

    H.-J. Lin, S.-B. Zhang, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Coulomb drag in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 136301 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [47]

    Feng, C.-Y

    P. Feng, C.-Y. Tan, M. Gao, X.-W. Yan, Z.-X. Liu, P.-J. Guo, F. Ma, and Z.-Y. Lu, Type-ii quantum spin hall insulator, arXiv:2503.13397

    work page arXiv

  47. [48]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y. Qiao, Z. Shi, S. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Liu, M. Ye, Y. Huang, X. Meng, C. Zhang, T. Okuda, K. Shimada, S. Cui, Y. Zhao, G.-H. Cao, S. Qiao, J. Liu, and C. Chen, Crystal-symmetry-paired spin-valley locking in a layered room-temperature metallic altermagnet candidate, Nat. Phys.21, 760–767 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [49]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, Y.-J. Sun, Y. Huang, X. Zheng, Y. Peng, L. He, S. Li, J. Luo, Z. Li, G. Chen, H. Li, H. Weng, and T. Qian, A metallic room-temperature d- wave altermagnet, Nat. Phys.21, 754–759 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [50]

    Zhang, C

    R.-W. Zhang, C. Cui, R. Li, J. Duan, L. Li, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Predictable gate-field control of spin in alter- magnets with spin-layer coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 056401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [51]

    M. Gu, Y. Liu, H. Zhu, K. Yananose, X. Chen, Y. Hu, A. Stroppa, and Q. Liu, Ferroelectric switchable alter- magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106802 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [52]

    Z. Zhu, X. Duan, J. Zhang, B. Hao, I. ˇZuti´ c, and T. Zhou, Two-dimensional ferroelectric altermagnets: From model to material realization, Nano Letters25, 9456 (2025), pMID: 40411465

    work page 2025

  52. [53]

    Wang, W.-W

    S. Wang, W.-W. Wang, J. Fan, X. Zhou, X.-P. Li, and 8 L. Wang, Two-dimensional dual-switchable ferroelectric altermagnets: Altering electrons and magnons, Nano Letters25, 14618 (2025), pMID: 40987544

    work page 2025

  53. [54]

    X. Duan, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y. Liu, Z. Zhang, I. ˇZuti´ c, and T. Zhou, Antiferroelectric altermagnets: Antiferro- electricity alters magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [55]

    M. Q. Dong, B. Liu, Z. H. Dai, Z.-X. Guo, H. Xiang, and X.-G. Gong, Fractional quantum multiferroics from coupling of fractional quantum ferroelectricity and alter- magnetism, arXiv:2510.16733

    work page arXiv

  55. [56]

    J. Lu, M. Tian, C. Cui, Z.-M. Yu, R.-W. Zhang, and Y. Yao, Nonvolatile electrical control of spin via sliding fractional quantum multiferroics, arXiv:2512.21559

    work page arXiv

  56. [57]

    ˇSmejkal, Altermagnetic multiferroics and altermag- netoelectric effect, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19928 (2024)

    L. ˇSmejkal, Altermagnetic multiferroics and altermagne- toelectric effect, arXiv:2411.19928

    work page arXiv

  57. [58]

    Y. Wang, C. Cui, Y. Han, T. He, W. Wu, R.-W. Zhang, Z.-M. Yu, S. A. Yang, and Y. Yao, Type-ii antiferroelec- tricity, arXiv:2507.20285

    work page arXiv

  58. [59]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polariza- tion of crystalline solids, Phys. Rev. B47, 1651 (1993)

    work page 1993

  59. [60]

    Resta, Macroscopic polarization in crystalline di- electrics: the geometric phase approach, Rev

    R. Resta, Macroscopic polarization in crystalline di- electrics: the geometric phase approach, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 899 (1994)

    work page 1994

  60. [61]

    Resta and D

    R. Resta and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polarization: A modern approach, inPhysics of Ferroelectrics: A Modern Perspective(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidel- berg, 2007) pp. 31–68

    work page 2007

  61. [62]

    See supplemental material for detailed computational methods, data for the monolayer (A 2Cl2)Xfamily (A= Cr,Mn,Fe,Co,Ni;X= O,S,Se,Te), and results for the AA-stacked candidate material Ca(CoN) 2,

    work page