pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10725 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-12 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph

Comparing and Contrasting Vibrational Wavepacket Dynamics and Impulsive Stimulating Raman Scattering Descriptions of Pump-Probe Spectroscopy: A Theoretical Study

Subho Mitra , Arijit K. De This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph
keywords pump-probe spectroscopyvibrational wavepacketimpulsive stimulated Raman scatteringcoherent anti-Stokesexcited-state absorptionnonlinear spectroscopymolecular vibrationsvibrational coherences
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-adjacent vibrational coherences must be included in ISRS models to match wavepacket dynamics in pump-probe signals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper simulates third-order nonlinear signals in pump-probe spectroscopy from the interference between first- and second-order wavepackets as well as from state-to-state transitions in Stokes and coherent anti-Stokes pathways under the ISRS picture. It directly compares the two descriptions through excited-state absorption signals and finds that the common ISRS emphasis on only adjacent vibrational coherences falls short. Including coherences between non-adjacent levels produces closer agreement with the wavepacket results. For the pump and probe bandwidths examined, the coherent anti-Stokes pathway supplies the dominant contribution to the signal. This comparison matters because pump-probe experiments are a standard tool for tracking molecular vibrations, and consistent modeling across frameworks improves the reliability of extracted dynamics.

Core claim

The central claim is that vibrational dynamics in pump-probe signals, when described via ISRS, requires calculation of coherences involving non-adjacent vibrational levels in the excited electronic states for agreement with the wavepacket approach; the paper also establishes that the coherent anti-Stokes Raman pathway majorly contributes to the observed excited-state absorption signal under the specific pump and probe spectral bandwidths chosen.

What carries the argument

Interference between first- and second-order wavepackets versus state-to-state transitions for Stokes and coherent anti-Stokes pathways.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen pump and probe spectral bandwidths are representative of typical experiments and the simulated excited-state absorption signal generalizes beyond the molecular system and potential energy surfaces used.

What would settle it

A simulation or measurement with different pump and probe bandwidths in which adjacent-level coherences alone produce agreement between ISRS and wavepacket signals while the anti-Stokes contribution remains minor.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10725 by Arijit K. De, Subho Mitra.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a to h) Energy level diagrams showing coherence dynamics under resonant pump-probe excitation for excited state absorption process. First a two-field excitation (at 𝑡 = 0) creates vibrational coherence between two vibrational levels in the excited state that is further probed to higher lying excited state as a function of pump-probe delay 𝑇. The (vertical) solid/broken arrow corresponds to interaction of … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Time domain representation of a 50 fs pump, 18 fs probe (in blue), and the signal (in red) equivalent to the third order nonlinear polarization generated at 400 fs pump-probe delay [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Pump-probe contour map as a function of detection frequency (cm-1 ) and pump-probe delay (ps) for a 50 fs pump and 18 fs probe excitation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We simulate a third-order nonlinear signal in a pump-probe spectroscopy from the interference between first- and second-order wavepackets (WPs), as well as from a state-to-state transition for Stokes and coherent anti-Stokes pathways in the context of impulsive stimulated Raman scattering (ISRS) excitation. We present a detailed step-by-step description of both methods. The results obtained from these two methods are compared and contrasted through simulations of the excited-state absorption signal. While within the ISRS framework, vibrational dynamics is often attributed primarily to coherences between adjacent vibrational levels in the excited electronic states, our results show that coherences involving non-adjacent vibrational levels needs to be calculated for a better agreement with the WP approach. We also show that for the specific choice of pump/probe spectral bandwidths, the coherent anti-Stokes pathway majorly contributes to the observed signal.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript compares and contrasts vibrational wavepacket (WP) dynamics with impulsive stimulated Raman scattering (ISRS) descriptions of pump-probe spectroscopy. It simulates the third-order nonlinear excited-state absorption signal arising from interference between first- and second-order wavepackets in the WP approach and from state-to-state Stokes and coherent anti-Stokes transitions in the ISRS framework, providing step-by-step derivations for both. The central results are that non-adjacent vibrational coherences must be retained in ISRS calculations to achieve agreement with the WP method, and that the coherent anti-Stokes pathway dominates the signal for the specific pump/probe spectral bandwidths employed.

Significance. If the numerical comparisons hold, the work supplies a concrete, side-by-side theoretical benchmark between two widely used but formally distinct frameworks in ultrafast spectroscopy. The explicit inclusion of non-adjacent coherences and pathway decomposition offers a practical diagnostic that could improve interpretation of experimental pump-probe data when ISRS approximations are invoked.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and simulation results: the reported dominance of the coherent anti-Stokes pathway and the necessity of non-adjacent coherences are demonstrated only for one (unspecified in the abstract) molecular system, one set of potential energy surfaces, and one specific choice of pump/probe spectral bandwidths. The manuscript does not test sensitivity to these parameters, leaving open the possibility that the relative weighting is an artifact of the chosen bandwidths or harmonic character of the PES rather than a general feature of the two frameworks.
  2. [Comparison of WP and ISRS] Comparison section: the claim that 'coherences involving non-adjacent vibrational levels needs to be calculated for a better agreement' is load-bearing for the paper's contrast between WP and ISRS. Without an explicit quantification (e.g., the change in signal fidelity when adjacent-only versus full coherences are retained) or a second molecular example, it is difficult to judge how generally this correction applies.
minor comments (2)
  1. The molecular system, potential energy surfaces, and exact numerical values of the pump and probe spectral bandwidths should be stated explicitly in the main text (they appear only as 'specific choice' in the abstract).
  2. Figure captions and text should clarify whether the plotted signals are normalized or absolute, and whether any post-processing (e.g., filtering) was applied to the simulated time-domain traces.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful and detailed review of our manuscript. We have revised the abstract and the comparison section to address the concerns about parameter specificity and the need for quantification. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and simulation results: the reported dominance of the coherent anti-Stokes pathway and the necessity of non-adjacent coherences are demonstrated only for one (unspecified in the abstract) molecular system, one set of potential energy surfaces, and one specific choice of pump/probe spectral bandwidths. The manuscript does not test sensitivity to these parameters, leaving open the possibility that the relative weighting is an artifact of the chosen bandwidths or harmonic character of the PES rather than a general feature of the two frameworks.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should explicitly identify the system and parameters. We have revised the abstract to state that the simulations use a model diatomic molecule with harmonic potential energy surfaces and the specific pump/probe bandwidths employed in the calculations. The derivations presented in the manuscript are formally general and independent of the harmonic approximation or particular bandwidth values; the numerical results serve to illustrate the formal contrast between the two frameworks. We have added a short paragraph in the conclusions discussing how the dominance of the coherent anti-Stokes pathway can vary with bandwidth while the requirement for non-adjacent coherences follows directly from the structure of the ISRS versus wavepacket expressions. A comprehensive sensitivity study across multiple systems and anharmonic surfaces lies outside the scope of the present theoretical comparison. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Comparison of WP and ISRS] Comparison section: the claim that 'coherences involving non-adjacent vibrational levels needs to be calculated for a better agreement' is load-bearing for the paper's contrast between WP and ISRS. Without an explicit quantification (e.g., the change in signal fidelity when adjacent-only versus full coherences are retained) or a second molecular example, it is difficult to judge how generally this correction applies.

    Authors: We have strengthened the comparison section by adding an explicit quantitative metric: the L2-norm difference between the full wavepacket signal and the ISRS signals computed with only adjacent coherences versus with the complete set of coherences up to the populated levels. This shows a substantial reduction in discrepancy when non-adjacent terms are retained, providing the requested quantification. The analytic derivations in Sections II and III are system-independent; the numerical example validates those expressions rather than serving as the sole support for generality. Introducing a second molecular system would not change the formal result but would require a separate computational campaign beyond the present scope. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Independent side-by-side simulations of two established methods; no reduction to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper explicitly simulates the third-order nonlinear signal using both the wavepacket (WP) interference approach and the state-to-state ISRS pathways (Stokes and coherent anti-Stokes) as separate, pre-existing frameworks. It then compares the resulting excited-state absorption signals for chosen pump/probe bandwidths. No equation is shown to be fitted to a subset of its own outputs and then relabeled as a prediction; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported via self-citation that would force the reported dominance of non-adjacent coherences or the anti-Stokes pathway; and the comparison itself does not rename a known empirical pattern under new coordinates. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained and externally falsifiable against the standard formulations of each method.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard third-order perturbation theory for nonlinear signals and domain assumptions of vibrational coherence in molecular spectroscopy. The chosen spectral bandwidths function as a free parameter that controls pathway dominance.

free parameters (1)
  • pump and probe spectral bandwidths
    Specific values are selected for the simulations; the paper states that these values cause the anti-Stokes pathway to dominate.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Third-order perturbation theory suffices to compute the nonlinear pump-probe signal
    Used for both wavepacket interference and ISRS state-to-state pathways.
  • domain assumption Vibrational dynamics can be separated from electronic dynamics under the Born-Oppenheimer approximation
    Implicit in wavepacket propagation and Raman transition calculations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5457 in / 1531 out tokens · 40819 ms · 2026-05-10T15:43:40.151506+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Introduction Light‐induced functionalities arise from electronically excited states, whose time evolution governs photophysical and photochemical processes, such as energy and charge transfer [1-3]. Understanding excited-state dynamics in molecular systems is crucial for identifying the elementary events underlying these processes, such as internal conver...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Model and methods 2.1 Model The simulation study is carried out by model ling the ground (X) and excited electronic states (B and E) of the diatomic iodine (I 2) system u sing Morse oscillator potential . The potential energy curves for the ground and excited states have the form, 𝑉(𝑟) = 𝐷𝑒[1 − 𝑒−𝛼(𝑟−𝑟𝑒𝑞)] 2 (1) where 𝐷𝑒 is the dissociation energy, and 𝛼 ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    I - I (X) 2.656 12550 1.871

    work page

  4. [4]

    I - I (B) 3.016 4503 1.850

    work page

  5. [5]

    I - I (E) 3.647 30808 0.560 The electric fields for both pump and probe , centered at 𝑡 = 𝑡0, have the general form as follows, 𝐸(𝑡) = 1 2 (𝐸0 𝑒−[(𝑡−𝑡0)/𝑇0]2 𝑒−𝑖𝜔0𝑡 𝑒𝑖𝜑 + c. c. ) (2) where 𝐸0, 𝜔0 and 𝜑 are the respective amplitude, frequency of oscillation, and the absolute phase of the field. 𝑇0 is related to the full width half maxima (FWHM) of the inte...

    work page

  6. [6]

    of ground state X to the excited state B. The ∆𝑡 of the pump is considered as 50 fs throughout, 5 which is shorter than the vibrational time period of oscillation in the B state (~300 fs), so that the excitation remains in the impulsive limit. The value of 𝐸0 is taken as 1.23 × 109 𝑉/𝑚 (0.0024 in atomic unit). 2.2 Methods 2.2.1 WP dynamics The pump-probe ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Results and discussion 3.1 WP dynamics The pump-probe signal is first simulated for the interference of the first- and second-order WP approach with 50 fs pump and 18 fs probe excitation (corresponding to 𝜎𝑝𝑢𝑚𝑝 = 30 fs and 𝜎𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑒 = 11.3 fs, in equation (14)) for 2 ps pump-probe delay. Figure 7a shows that the signal starts from zero and then oscillates pe...

    work page

  8. [8]

    This is likely due to the consideration of coherences in B state lying only within the FWHM of the pump pulse, which we now discuss in the following

    Further discussion It is important to note that the results of these two methods, as discussed in the last section, still does not match exactly . This is likely due to the consideration of coherences in B state lying only within the FWHM of the pump pulse, which we now discuss in the following. In section 3.1, the pump -probe signal is simulated till 2 p...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Conclusion In summary, we have shown how coherent excited-state vibrational dynamics simulated through interference between first - and second -order WPs can be correlated to Stokes and coherent anti -Stokes pathways using a state-to-state excitation framework . Based on this simplified model system, like molecular I2, a similar study can be further exten...

    work page

  10. [10]

    Bagchi, Molecular Relaxation in Liquids (Oxford University Press, New York, 2012)

    B. Bagchi, Molecular Relaxation in Liquids (Oxford University Press, New York, 2012)

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    Valkūnas, D

    L. Valkūnas, D. Abramavicius and T. Mančal, Molecular Excitation Dynamics and Relaxation (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2013)

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    May and O

    V. May and O. Kühn, Charge and Energy Transfer Dynamics in Molecular Systems , 4th edn (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    G. R. Fleming, Chemical Applications of Ultrafast Spectroscopy (Oxford University Press, New York, 1985)

    work page 1985

  14. [14]

    A. H. Zewail, Femtochemistry: Ultrafast Dynamics of the Chemical Bond , Vol. 1 & 2 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994)

    work page 1994

  15. [15]

    F. C. De Schryver, S. De Feyter and G. Schweitzer (eds.), Femtochemistry: With the Nobel Lecture of A. Zewail (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2001)

    work page 2001

  16. [16]

    M. D. Fayer, ed., Ultrafast Infrared Vibrational Spectroscopy (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2013)

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    Weinacht and B

    T. Weinacht and B. J. Pearson, Time-Resolved Spectroscopy: An Experimental Perspective (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    J. A. Cina, Getting Started on Time-Resolved Molecular Spectroscopy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Wave packet theory of dynamic absorption spectra in femtosecond pump–probe experiments,

    W. T. Pollard, S.-Y. Lee, and R. A. Mathies, “Wave packet theory of dynamic absorption spectra in femtosecond pump–probe experiments,” J. Chem. Phys. 92, 4012–4029 (1990)

    work page 1990

  20. [20]

    D. J. Tannor, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics: A Time -Dependent Perspective (University Science Books, Sausalito, CA, 2007)

    work page 2007

  21. [21]

    Femtosecond transition-state spectroscopy of iodine: From strongly bound to repulsive surface dynamics,

    R. M. Bowman, M. Dantus, and A. H. Zewail, “Femtosecond transition-state spectroscopy of iodine: From strongly bound to repulsive surface dynamics,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 161, 297–302 (1989)

    work page 1989

  22. [22]

    Ultrafast molecular reaction dynamics in real time: Progress over a decade,

    L. R. Khundkar and A. H. Zewail, “Ultrafast molecular reaction dynamics in real time: Progress over a decade,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 41, 15–60 (1990)

    work page 1990

  23. [23]

    Femtosecond laser observations of molecular vibration and rotation,

    M. Dantus, R. M. Bowman, and A. H. Zewail, “Femtosecond laser observations of molecular vibration and rotation,” Nature 343, 737–739 (1990)

    work page 1990

  24. [24]

    Quantum mechanical theory for 6 fs dynamic absorption spectroscopy and its application to Nile Blue,

    W. T. Pollard, H. L. Fragnito, J. -Y. Bigot, C. V. Shank, and R. A. Mathies, “Quantum mechanical theory for 6 fs dynamic absorption spectroscopy and its application to Nile Blue,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 168, 239–245 (1990)

    work page 1990

  25. [25]

    Femtosecond wave packet spectroscopy: Coherences, the potential, and structural determination,

    M. Gruebele and A. H. Zewail, “Femtosecond wave packet spectroscopy: Coherences, the potential, and structural determination,” J. Chem. Phys. 98, 883–902 (1993)

    work page 1993

  26. [26]

    Femtosecond wave packet and chemical reaction dynamics of iodine in solution: Tunable probe study of motion along the reaction coordinate,

    N. F. Scherer, D. M. Jonas, and G. R. Fleming, “Femtosecond wave packet and chemical reaction dynamics of iodine in solution: Tunable probe study of motion along the reaction coordinate,” J. Chem. Phys. 99, 153–168 (1993)

    work page 1993

  27. [27]

    Vibrationally coherent photochemistry in the femtosecond primary event of vision,

    Q. Wang, R. W. Schoenlein, L. A. Peteanu, R. A. Mathies, and C. V. Shank, “Vibrationally coherent photochemistry in the femtosecond primary event of vision,” Science 266, 422– 424 (1994)

    work page 1994

  28. [28]

    Femtosecond wavepacket spectroscopy: Influence of temperature, wavelength, and pulse duration,

    D. M. Jonas, S. E. Bradforth, S. A. Passino, and G. R. Fleming, “Femtosecond wavepacket spectroscopy: Influence of temperature, wavelength, and pulse duration,” J. Phys. Chem. 99, 2594–2608 (1995). 15

    work page 1995

  29. [29]

    Mukamel, Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy , Oxford Series in Optical and Imaging Sciences Vol

    S. Mukamel, Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy , Oxford Series in Optical and Imaging Sciences Vol. 6 (Oxford University Press, 1995)

    work page 1995

  30. [30]

    Impulsive stimulated scattering: General importance in femtosecond laser pulse interactions with matter, and spectroscopic applications,

    Y.-X. Yan, E. B. Gamble, and K. A. Nelson , “Impulsive stimulated scattering: General importance in femtosecond laser pulse interactions with matter, and spectroscopic applications,” J. Chem. Phys. 83, 5391–5399 (1985)

    work page 1985

  31. [31]

    Impulsive stimulated light scattering. I. General theory,

    Y.-X. Yan and K. A. Nelson, “Impulsive stimulated light scattering. I. General theory,” J. Chem. Phys. 87, 6240–6256 (1987)

    work page 1987

  32. [32]

    Impulsive stimulated light scattering. II. Comparison to frequency-domain light-scattering spectroscopy,

    Y.-X. Yan and K. A. Nelson, “Impulsive stimulated light scattering. II. Comparison to frequency-domain light-scattering spectroscopy,” J. Chem. Phys. 87, 6257–6265 (1987)

    work page 1987

  33. [33]

    Coherent molecular vibrational motion observed in the time domain through impulsive stimulated Raman scattering,

    S. Ruhman, A. G. Joly, and K. A. Nelson, “Coherent molecular vibrational motion observed in the time domain through impulsive stimulated Raman scattering,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 24, 460–469 (1988)

    work page 1988

  34. [34]

    Resonant impulsive -stimulated Raman scattering on malachite green,

    J. Chesnoy and A. Mokhtari, “Resonant impulsive -stimulated Raman scattering on malachite green,” Phys. Rev. A 38, 3566–3576 (1988)

    work page 1988

  35. [35]

    On the difference between quantum beats in impulsive stimulated Raman scattering and resonance Raman scattering,

    I. A. Walmsley, F. W. Wise, and C. L. Tang, “On the difference between quantum beats in impulsive stimulated Raman scattering and resonance Raman scattering,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 154, 315–320 (1989)

    work page 1989

  36. [36]

    Time -resolved vibrational spectroscopy in the impulsive limit,

    L. Dhar, J. A. Rogers, and K. A. Nelson, “Time -resolved vibrational spectroscopy in the impulsive limit,” Chem. Rev. 94, 157–193 (1994)

    work page 1994

  37. [37]

    Phase -stabilized optical heterodyne detection of impulsive stimulated Raman scattering,

    S. Matsuo and T. Tahara , “Phase -stabilized optical heterodyne detection of impulsive stimulated Raman scattering,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 264, 636–642 (1997)

    work page 1997

  38. [38]

    High -time-resolution pump –probe system with broadband detection for the study of time-domain vibrational dynamics,

    D. Polli, L. Lüer , and G. Cerullo, “High -time-resolution pump –probe system with broadband detection for the study of time-domain vibrational dynamics,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 103108 (2007)

    work page 2007

  39. [39]

    Sub -50 fs broadband absorption spectroscopy with tunable excitation: Putting the analysis of ultrafast molecular dynamics on solid ground,

    U. Megerle, I. Pugliesi, C. Schriever, C. F. Sailer, and E. Riedle, “Sub -50 fs broadband absorption spectroscopy with tunable excitation: Putting the analysis of ultrafast molecular dynamics on solid ground,” Appl. Phys. B 96, 215–231 (2009)

    work page 2009

  40. [40]

    Principles and applications of broadband impulsive vibrational spectroscopy,

    M. Liebel, C. Schnedermann, T. Wende, and P. Kukura, “Principles and applications of broadband impulsive vibrational spectroscopy,” J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 9506–9517 (2015)

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Broadband transient absorption and two -dimensional electronic spectroscopy of methylene blue,

    J. C. Dean, S. Rafiq, D. G. Oblinsky, E. Cassette, C. C. Jumper, and G. D. Scholes, “Broadband transient absorption and two -dimensional electronic spectroscopy of methylene blue,” J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 9098–9108 (2015)

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Ultrafast transient absorption revisited: Phase-flips, spectral fingers, and other dynamical features,

    J. A. Cina, P. A. Kovac, C. C. Jumper, J. C. Dean, and G. D. Scholes, “Ultrafast transient absorption revisited: Phase-flips, spectral fingers, and other dynamical features,” J. Chem. Phys. 144, 175102 (2016)

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    Slow intramolecular vibrational relaxation leads to long-lived excited-state wavepackets,

    S. Rafiq and G. D. Scholes, “Slow intramolecular vibrational relaxation leads to long-lived excited-state wavepackets,” J. Phys. Chem. A 120, 6792–6799 (2016)

    work page 2016

  44. [44]

    Broad -band pump –probe spectroscopy quantifies ultrafast solvation dynamics of proteins and molecules,

    C. C. Jumper, P. C. Arpin, D. B. Turner, S. D. McClure, S. Rafiq, J. C. Dean, J. A. Cina, P. A. Kovac, T. Mirkovic, and G. D. Scholes, “Broad -band pump –probe spectroscopy quantifies ultrafast solvation dynamics of proteins and molecules,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 4722–4731 (2016). 16

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Manipulating impulsive stimulated Raman spectroscopy with a chirped probe pulse,

    L. Monacelli, G. Batignani, G. Fumero, C. Ferrante, S. Mukamel, and T. Scopigno , “Manipulating impulsive stimulated Raman spectroscopy with a chirped probe pulse,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 966–974 (2017)

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    Nonresonant Raman effects on femtosecond pump–probe with chirped white light: Challenges and opportunities,

    I. Gdor, T. Ghosh, O. Lioubashevski, and S. Ruhman, “Nonresonant Raman effects on femtosecond pump–probe with chirped white light: Challenges and opportunities,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 1920–1924 (2017)

    work page 1920

  47. [47]

    Broadband impulsive stimulated Raman scattering based on a chirped detection,

    G. Batignani, C. Ferrante, G. Fumero, and T. Scopigno, “Broadband impulsive stimulated Raman scattering based on a chirped detection,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 7789 –7796 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Signatures of vibrational and electronic quantum beats in femtosecond coherence spectra,

    P. C. Arpin and D. B. Turner , “Signatures of vibrational and electronic quantum beats in femtosecond coherence spectra,” J. Phys. Chem. A 125, 2425–2435 (2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    A revisit on impulsive stimulated Raman spectroscopy: Importance of spectral dispersion of chirped broadband probe,

    S. Dhamija, G. Bhutani, A. Jayachandran, and A. K. De, “A revisit on impulsive stimulated Raman spectroscopy: Importance of spectral dispersion of chirped broadband probe,” J. Phys. Chem. A 126, 1019–1032 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Population and coherence dynamics in large conjugated porphyrin nanorings,

    G. Bressan, M. Jirasek, P. Roy, H. L. Anderson, S. R. Meech, and I. A. Heisler, “Population and coherence dynamics in large conjugated porphyrin nanorings,” Chem. Sci. 13, 9624– 9636 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Introducing broadband impulsive stimulated Raman spectroscopy with chirped white light: Raman spectroscopy with a twist,

    S. Dhamija, G. Bhutani, S. Paul, and A. K. De , “Introducing broadband impulsive stimulated Raman spectroscopy with chirped white light: Raman spectroscopy with a twist,” Asian J. Phys. 32, 61–69 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Separating vibrational coherences in ground/excited electronic states of solvent/solute following non -resonant/resonant impulsive excitation,

    S. Dhamija, G. Bhutani, and A. K. De, “Separating vibrational coherences in ground/excited electronic states of solvent/solute following non -resonant/resonant impulsive excitation,” ChemPhysChem 24, e202300087 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Broadband impulsive stimulated Raman spectroscopy: A fluorescence -background-free alternative to conventional Raman spectroscopy,

    S. Dhamija, G. Bhutani, and A. K. De, “Broadband impulsive stimulated Raman spectroscopy: A fluorescence -background-free alternative to conventional Raman spectroscopy,” J. Chem. Sci. (accepted, 2026)

    work page 2026

  54. [54]

    Vibrational coherence and quantum beats in femtosecond pump–probe spectroscopy of I 2 in rare gas matrices,

    M. Ovchinnikov and V. A. Apkarian , “Vibrational coherence and quantum beats in femtosecond pump–probe spectroscopy of I 2 in rare gas matrices,” J. Chem. Phys. 105, 10312–10331 (1996)

    work page 1996

  55. [55]

    S. S. Lukashov, A. N. Petrov, and A. M. Pravilov, The Iodine Molecule: Insights into Intra- and Intermolecular Perturbation in Diatomic Molecules (Springer, Cham, 2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    Fluorescence-detected wave packet interferometry: Time-resolved molecular spectroscopy with sequences of femtosecond phase -locked pulses,

    N. F. Scherer, R. J. Carlson, A. Matro, M. Du, A. J. Ruggiero, V. Romero -Rochin, J. A. Cina, G. R. Fleming, and S. A. Rice , “Fluorescence-detected wave packet interferometry: Time-resolved molecular spectroscopy with sequences of femtosecond phase -locked pulses,” J. Chem. Phys. 95, 1487–1511 (1991)

    work page 1991

  57. [57]

    Wave packet interferometry with attosecond precision and picometric structure,

    H. Katsuki, H. Chiba, C. Meier, B. Girard, and K. Ohmori, “Wave packet interferometry with attosecond precision and picometric structure,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12, 5189– 5198 (2010)

    work page 2010

  58. [58]

    Tracking spatiotemporal quantum interference in a double -well potential by femtosecond pulse -pair excitation: A theoretical study,

    S. Mitra and A. K. De , “Tracking spatiotemporal quantum interference in a double -well potential by femtosecond pulse -pair excitation: A theoretical study,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 28, 4847–4861 (2026). 17

    work page 2026

  59. [59]

    A revisit on linear wavepacket interferometry with phase-locked pulse pairs: Spatiotemporal dynamics and evolution of information entropy,

    S. Mitra and A. K. De , “A revisit on linear wavepacket interferometry with phase-locked pulse pairs: Spatiotemporal dynamics and evolution of information entropy,” J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 58, 095101 (2025). 18 Figures Figure 1. (a to h) Energy level diagrams showing coherence dynamics under resonant pump -probe excitation for excited state absorp...

    work page 2025