Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 105 references

Accessing gluon GTMD $F^g_{1,4}$ via the $\langle\sin(2\phi)\rangle$ azimuthal asymmetry of exclusive $\pi^0$ production in $ep$ collisions

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-10 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The sin(2φ) azimuthal asymmetry in exclusive neutral pion production probes the imaginary part of gluon GTMD F^g_{1,4}.

desk verdict The paper gives the first model calculation of Im(F^g_{1,4}) in a light-front spectator setup and folds it into predictions for the sin(2φ) asymmetry in exclusive π⁰ production at EIC kinematics. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.10738 v1 submitted 2026-04-12 hep-ph

Chentao Tan , Zhun Lu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords gluonGTMDazimuthalasymmetryexclusivepionproductionspinPrimakoffprocesselectron-ioncolliderlight-frontspectatormodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the longitudinal single-target spin asymmetry in exclusive π⁰ production in ep collisions serves as a sensitive probe of the imaginary part of the gluon generalized transverse momentum dependent distribution F^g_{1,4}. The asymmetry shows up as a sin(2φ) correlation between the scattered electron and recoil proton momenta, generated by interference between Coulomb and nuclear amplitudes. The authors compute the relevant gluon distributions using a light-front spectator model of the proton that includes explicit gluonic degrees of freedom. They deliver the first model calculation of Im(F^g_{1,4}) together with numerical predictions for the asymmetry at kinematics relevant to the planned Electron-Ion Colliders. A sympathetic reader would care because GTMDs encode detailed three-dimensional information on gluon distributions inside the proton, which future colliders aim to map.

What carries the argument

The gluon GTMD F^g_{1,4} (specifically its imaginary part), accessed through the sin(2φ) azimuthal spin asymmetry generated by Coulomb-nuclear interference in the Primakoff process.

What would settle it

A measurement of the sin(2φ) azimuthal asymmetry in exclusive π⁰ electroproduction at EIC energies that differs substantially in magnitude or sign from the model's numerical predictions would show that the asymmetry does not probe Im(F^g_{1,4}) as calculated here.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The longitudinal single-target spin asymmetry in exclusive π⁰ production in ep collisions appears as a characteristic sin(2φ) azimuthal correlation due to Coulomb-nuclear interference and is therefore sensitive to the imaginary part of the gluon GTMD F^g_{1,4}. The Primakoff process must be included. The authors compute the gluon distributions in a light-front spectator model with explicit gluonic degrees of freedom, present the first model calculation of Im(F^g_{1,4}), and give predictions for the resulting asymmetries at EIC and EicC kinematics.

Load-bearing premise

The light-front spectator model with explicit gluonic degrees of freedom correctly captures the non-perturbative gluon dynamics that determine Im(F^g_{1,4}).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The sin(2φ) asymmetry provides a concrete experimental handle on a previously uncalculated gluon GTMD component.
  • Accurate predictions require explicit inclusion of the Primakoff process alongside the nuclear contribution.
  • The light-front model supplies first numerical values for Im(F^g_{1,4}) that can be directly compared with data.
  • Predictions are available for the kinematics expected at the Electron-Ion Collider and the proposed EicC.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Confirmation at the EIC would open a new experimental channel for mapping the three-dimensional gluon structure of the proton at moderate x.
  • The same interference mechanism could be examined in other exclusive meson channels to constrain additional GTMD components.
  • If the spectator model is validated here, it could be applied to related observables such as single-spin asymmetries in other processes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the longitudinal single-target spin asymmetry in exclusive π⁰ production in ep collisions appears as a ⟨sin(2φ)⟩ azimuthal asymmetry generated by Coulomb-nuclear interference in the Primakoff process, thereby providing access to the imaginary part of the gluon GTMD F^g_{1,4}. The authors compute this distribution for the first time in a light-front spectator model of the proton that includes explicit gluonic degrees of freedom and present numerical predictions for the asymmetry in EIC and EicC kinematics.

Significance. If the model evaluation of Im(F^g_{1,4}) is reliable, the work supplies the first quantitative predictions for a novel observable that could be measured at future electron-ion colliders, offering a potential new probe of gluon transverse-momentum-dependent structure beyond standard GPDs.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (light-front spectator model): The computation of Im(F^g_{1,4}) rests entirely on this model, yet the manuscript provides no comparison of the same framework to lattice QCD moments of gluon distributions, unpolarized GTMDs, or any other gluon-sensitive observable that can be confronted with existing data. This absence leaves the magnitude and sign of the predicted asymmetry as an unanchored model output rather than a robust extraction.
  2. [§5] §5 (numerical predictions): The asymmetry results at EIC/EicC kinematics are presented as direct consequences of the model; without external validation or uncertainty estimates tied to model assumptions, it is unclear whether the claimed sensitivity can be translated into a reliable extraction strategy once data arrive.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the Primakoff process 'should be included' but does not quantify its relative contribution to the sin(2φ) term versus other mechanisms; a brief estimate in the introduction would improve clarity.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the GTMD F^g_{1,4} is introduced without an explicit reference to the standard parametrization (e.g., the relation to the gluon helicity flip amplitude); adding one sentence with the defining equation would aid readers unfamiliar with the GTMD literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional discussion and uncertainty estimates where feasible, while noting the limitations inherent to this being the first calculation of Im(F^g_{1,4}).

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (light-front spectator model): The computation of Im(F^g_{1,4}) rests entirely on this model, yet the manuscript provides no comparison of the same framework to lattice QCD moments of gluon distributions, unpolarized GTMDs, or any other gluon-sensitive observable that can be confronted with existing data. This absence leaves the magnitude and sign of the predicted asymmetry as an unanchored model output rather than a robust extraction.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from explicit context on the model's prior validations. The light-front spectator model with explicit gluons has been used in our previous works to compute unpolarized gluon GTMDs and related quantities, where it reproduces known limits and is constrained by phenomenological inputs. However, because Im(F^g_{1,4}) has no existing lattice QCD results or data for direct comparison, such benchmarks are not yet possible. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph referencing our earlier validations of the same framework for gluon distributions and explain that the sign of the asymmetry is fixed by the model's Dirac structure rather than free parameters. We view this as sufficient anchoring for a first theoretical study while acknowledging that full lattice comparisons remain a future goal. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (numerical predictions): The asymmetry results at EIC/EicC kinematics are presented as direct consequences of the model; without external validation or uncertainty estimates tied to model assumptions, it is unclear whether the claimed sensitivity can be translated into a reliable extraction strategy once data arrive.

    Authors: We accept that uncertainty quantification would improve the utility of the predictions. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection estimating theoretical uncertainties by varying the model parameters within ranges fixed by our prior fits to other gluon observables. We will also expand the discussion to outline a possible extraction strategy, emphasizing that the sin(2φ) asymmetry provides direct access to Im(F^g_{1,4}) via Coulomb-nuclear interference and that its qualitative features are stable under reasonable parameter changes. These additions should clarify how the observable can be used once data become available. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Light-front spectator model computation of Im(F^g_{1,4}) is self-contained with no reduction to fitted inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper defines a light-front spectator model with explicit gluonic degrees of freedom, computes the gluon GTMD F^g_{1,4} (specifically its imaginary part) from that model, and then uses the result to predict the sin(2φ) asymmetry in exclusive π⁰ production. This is a standard forward model calculation: the model is specified independently of the target observable, the GTMD follows directly from the model's wave functions or overlaps, and the asymmetry is obtained by inserting the computed distribution into the standard cross-section formula. No equations reduce the final prediction to a fit of the same data, no uniqueness theorem is imported from prior self-work, and no ansatz is smuggled via citation. The abstract explicitly frames the work as 'the first model calculation,' confirming the derivation chain is open and falsifiable against future data rather than tautological. Therefore no circular steps exist.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; the claim rests on the unstated details of the light-front spectator model (wave-function ansatz, gluon inclusion, spectator mass, etc.) and on the assumption that Coulomb-nuclear interference generates the sin(2φ) term.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Light-front spectator model with explicit gluonic degrees of freedom accurately represents the proton's gluon GTMDs
    Invoked to compute F^g_{1,4}; no justification or validation given in abstract

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Accessing gluon GTMD $F^g_{1,4}$ via the $\langle\sin(2\phi)\rangle$ azimuthal asymmetry of exclusive $\pi^0$ production in $ep$ collisions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.10738

@misc{pith2026260410738,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Accessing gluon GTMD $F^g_1,4$ via the $\langle\sin(2\phi)\rangle$ azimuthal asymmetry of exclusive $\pi^0$ production in $ep$ collisions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.10738}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.10738}
}
abstract

The longitudinal single-target spin asymmetry in exclusive $\pi^0$ production in $ep$ collisions is a sensitive probe of the imaginary part of the gluon generalized transverse momentum dependent distribution $F_{1,4}^g$. It appears as a characteristic $\sin(2\phi)$ azimuthal correlation between the transverse momenta of the scattered electron and the recoil proton, generated by Coulomb-nuclear interference; consequently, the Primakoff process should be included. We compute the relevant gluon distributions in a light-front spectator model of the proton that explicitly incorporates gluonic degrees of freedom. This work presents the first model calculation of the imaginary part of $F_{1,4}^g$ and delivers predictions for the resulting asymmetries in kinematics relevant to the planned Electron-Ion Colliders (EIC and EicC), providing theoretical predictions for upcoming measurements.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10738 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Kinematics of the exclusive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The fitting of the model result in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Left: Model prediction for the gluon helicity PDF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The dependence of the canonical gluon OAM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The dependence of the gluon Sivers function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Coulomb-nuclear interference contribution to the e [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The azimuthal asymmetries [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 105 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (22) 6 As a complex-valued function, F g 1, 4 = ReF g 1, 4 +iImF g 1, 4

    via the helicity difference: W↑↑ − W↓↓ = 2iǫij ⊥ ki ⊥ ∆ j ⊥ M 2 √ 1 − ξ2 F g 1, 4. (22) 6 As a complex-valued function, F g 1, 4 = ReF g 1, 4 +iImF g 1, 4. As mentioned in Ref. [ 27], the imaginary part of the gluon GTMD F g 1, 2 is linked to the Sivers function in the forward limit ( ξ → 0, ∆ ⊥ → 0) via ImF g 1, 2(x, 0, k2 ⊥ , 0, 0) = −f ⊥ g 1T (x, k2 ⊥ )...

    work page

  2. [2]

    We use 1000 data points in the range 0

    to the NNPDF3.1 dataset for xf g 1 (x) [ 51] at the initial scale µ 0 = 2 GeV. We use 1000 data points in the range 0 . 001 ≤ x ≤ 1 (step size 0.001). Simultaneous fitting of the unpolarized and helicity PDFs to NNPDF3.1 a nd NNPDFpol1.1 [ 10] was attempted but yielded significant deviations in the small- x region (0. 001 < x <0. 01), so we focus on the unp...

    work page

  3. [3]

    (35) From the figure, one can observe that the peak magnitude decrea ses and shifts to larger k⊥ asx increases

    3, while the right panel displays the first transverse moment of the gluon sivers function defined as f ⊥ (1)g 1T (x) = ∫ d2k⊥ k2 ⊥ 2M 2f ⊥ g 1T (x, k2 ⊥ ). (35) From the figure, one can observe that the peak magnitude decrea ses and shifts to larger k⊥ asx increases. The Sivers function in our model is negative in the entire x region, consistent with the ex...

    work page

  4. [4]

    We also set α s = 0

    In the forward and perturbative- Q2 limit the Odderon-induced cross section can be written as [ 35] dσ Odderon dtdQ2dxB ≈ π 5α 2 emα 2 sf 2 π 8xBN 2cM 2Q6 [ 1 − y + y2 2 ][ ∫ 1 0 dz φ π (z) z(1 − z) ∫ d2k⊥ k2 ⊥xf ⊥ g(d) 1T (x, k2 ⊥ ) k2 ⊥ +z(1 − z)Q2 ] 2 , (37) where Nc = 3, α em = 1/ 137, and fπ = 131 MeV is the π 0 decay constant. We also set α s = 0. 3...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Ashman et al

    J. Ashman et al. [European Muon Collaboration]: A Measurement of the Spin As ymmetry and Determination of the Structure Function g(1) in Deep Inelastic Muon-Proton Scat tering. Phys. Lett. B 206, 364 (1988)

    work page 1988

  6. [6]

    R. L. Jaffe, A. Manohar: The g1 Problem: Fact and Fantasy on the Spin of the Proton. Nucl. Phys. B 337, 509–546 (1990)

    work page 1990

  7. [7]

    X. D. Ji: Gauge-Invariant Decomposition of Nucleon Spin . Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 610–613 (1997). [arXiv:hep-ph/9603249 [hep-ph]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  8. [8]

    The angular momentum controversy: What's it all about and does it matter?

    E. Leader, C. Lorc´ e: The angular momentum controversy: What’s it all about and does it matter? Phys. Rept. 541, 163–248 (2014). [arXiv:1309.4235 [hep-ph]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

Show all 105 references
  1. [9]

    K. F. Liu, C. Lorc´ e: The Parton Orbital Angular Momentum : Status and Prospects. Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 160 (2016). [arXiv:1512.06699 [hep-ph]]

    2016

  2. [10]

    X. Ji, F. Yuan, Y. Zhao: What we know and what we don’t know a bout the proton spin after 30 years. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 27–38 (2021). [arXiv:2008.09552 [hep-ph]]

    2021

  3. [11]

    Leader: Role of the subsidiary fields in the momentum an d angular momentum in covariantly quantized QED and QCD

    E. Leader: Role of the subsidiary fields in the momentum an d angular momentum in covariantly quantized QED and QCD. Phys. Rev. D 105, 036005 (2022). [arXiv:2111.03369 [hep-th]]

    2022

  4. [12]

    Ashman et al

    J. Ashman et al. [European Muon Collaboration]: An Investigation of the Spi n Structure of the Proton in Deep Inelastic Scattering of Polarized Muons on Polarized Protons. Nucl. Phys. B 328, 1 (1989)

    1989

  5. [13]

    de Florian, R

    D. de Florian, R. Sassot, M. Stratmann, W. Vogelsang: Ext raction of Spin-Dependent Parton Densities and Their Uncertainties. Phys. Rev. D 80, 034030 (2009). [arXiv:0904.3821 [hep-ph]]

    2009

  6. [14]

    E. R. Nocera et al. [NNPDF Collaboration]: A first unbiased global determinati on of polarized PDFs and their uncer- tainties. Nucl. Phys. B 887, 276–308 (2014). [arXiv:1406.5539 [hep-ph]]

    2014

  7. [15]

    J. J. Ethier, N. Sato, W. Melnitchouk: First simultaneo us extraction of spin-dependent parton distributions and f rag- mentation functions from a global QCD analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 132001 (2017). [arXiv:1705.05889 [hep-ph]]

    2017

  8. [16]

    Adamczyk et al

    L. Adamczyk et al. [STAR Collaboration]: Precision Measurement of the Longit udinal Double-spin Asymmetry for Inclu- sive Jet Production in Polarized Proton Collisions at √ s = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 092002 (2015). [arXiv:1406.3801 [nucl-ex]]

    2015

  9. [17]

    de Florian, R

    D. de Florian, R. Sassot, M. Stratmann, W. Vogelsang: Ev idence for polarization of gluons in the proton. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 012001 (2014). [arXiv:1404.4293 [hep-ph]]

    2014

  10. [18]

    M. S. Abdallah et al. [STAR Collaboration]: Longitudinal double-spin asymmetr y for inclusive jet and dijet production in polarized proton collisions at √ s = 510 GeV. Phys. Rev. D 105, 092011 (2022). [arXiv:2112.01435 [nucl-ex]]

    2022

  11. [19]

    D. Boer, M. Diehl, R. Milner, R. Venugopalan, W. Vogelsa ng, D. Kaplan, H. Montgomery, S. Vigdor, A. Accardi, E. C. Aschenauer et al. : Gluons and the quark sea at high energies: Distributions, p olarization, tomography. [arXiv:1108.1713 [nucl-th]] (2011)

    2011

  12. [20]

    Abdul Khalek, A

    R. Abdul Khalek, A. Accardi, J. Adam, D. Adamiak, W. Aker s, M. Albaladejo, A. Al-bataineh, M. G. Alexeev, F. Ameli, P. Antonioli et al. : Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electr on-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report. Nucl. Phys. A 1026, 122447 (2022). [arXiv:21...

    2022

  13. [21]

    E. C. Aschenauer, I. Balitsky, L. Bland, S. J. Brodsky, M . Burkardt, V. Burkert, J. P. Chen, A. Deshpande, M. Diehl, L. Gamberg et al. : Pre-Town Meeting on Spin Physics at an Electron-Ion Collid er. Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 71 (2017). [arXiv:1409.1633 [nucl-ex]]

    2017

  14. [22]

    X. D. Ji: Deeply virtual Compton scattering. Phys. Rev. D 55, 7114–7125 (1997). [arXiv:hep-ph/9609381 [hep-ph]]

    1997

  15. [23]

    J. C. Collins, L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman: Factorizatio n for hard exclusive electroproduction of mesons in QCD. Phys. Rev. D 56, 2982–3006 (1997). [arXiv:hep-ph/9611433 [hep-ph]]

    1997

  16. [24]

    Lorc´ e, B

    C. Lorc´ e, B. Pasquini: Quark Wigner Distributions and Orbital Angular Momentum. Phys. Rev. D 84, 014015 (2011). [arXiv:1104.4687 [hep-ph]]

    2011

  17. [25]

    Hatta: Notes on the orbital angular momentum of quark s in the nucleon

    Y. Hatta: Notes on the orbital angular momentum of quark s in the nucleon. Phys. Lett. B 708, 186–190 (2012). [arXiv:1111.3278 [hep-ph]]

    2012

  18. [26]

    Lorc´ e, B

    C. Lorc´ e, B. Pasquini, X. Xiong, F. Yuan: The quark orbi tal angular momentum from Wigner distributions and light-c one wave functions. Phys. Rev. D 85, 114006 (2012). [arXiv:1111.4827 [hep-ph]] 13

    2012

  19. [27]

    M. A. Ebert, J. K. L. Michel, I. W. Stewart, Z. Sun: Disent angling long and short distances in momentum-space TMDs. JHEP 07, 129 (2022). [arXiv:2202.00691 [hep-ph]]

    2022

  20. [28]

    Bertone: Matching generalised transverse-momentu m-dependent distributions onto generalised parton distri butions at one loop

    V. Bertone: Matching generalised transverse-momentu m-dependent distributions onto generalised parton distri butions at one loop. Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 941 (2022). [arXiv:2206.02870 [hep-ph]]

    2022

  21. [29]

    M. G. Echevarria, P. A. Gutierrez Garcia, I. Scimemi: GT MDs and the factorization of exclusive double Drell-Yan. Phys. Lett. B 840, 137881 (2023). [arXiv:2207.10089 [hep-ph]]

    2023

  22. [30]

    Meissner, A

    S. Meissner, A. Metz, M. Schlegel, K. Goeke: Generalize d parton correlation functions for a spin-0 hadron. JHEP 08, 038 (2008). [arXiv:0805.3146 [hep-ph]]

    2008

  23. [31]

    Meissner, A

    S. Meissner, A. Metz, M. Schlegel: Generalized parton c orrelation functions for a spin-1/2 hadron. JHEP 08, 056 (2009). [arXiv:0906.5323 [hep-ph]]

    2009

  24. [32]

    Bhattacharya, A

    S. Bhattacharya, A. Metz, J. Zhou: Generalized TMDs and the exclusive double Drell–Yan process. Phys. Lett. B 771, 396–400 (2017); Erratum: Phys. Lett. B 810, 135866 (2020). [arXiv:1703.08260 [hep-ph]]

    2017

  25. [33]

    Bhattacharya, D

    S. Bhattacharya, D. Zheng, J. Zhou: Probing the Quark Or bital Angular Momentum at Electron-Ion Colliders Using Exclusive π 0 Production. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 051901 (2024). [arXiv:2308.10859 [hep-ph]]

    2024

  26. [34]

    X. Ji, F. Yuan, Y. Zhao: Hunting the Gluon Orbital Angula r Momentum at the Electron-Ion Collider. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 192004 (2017). [arXiv:1611.00011 [hep-ph]]

    2017

  27. [35]

    Hatta, Y

    Y. Hatta, Y. Nakagawa, F. Yuan, Y. Zhao, B. Xiao: Gluon or bital angular momentum at small- x. Phys. Rev. D 95, 114032 (2017). [arXiv:1612.02437 [hep-ph]]

    2017

  28. [36]

    Bhattacharya, R

    S. Bhattacharya, R. Boussarie, Y. Hatta: Signature of t he Gluon Orbital Angular Momentum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 182002 (2022). [arXiv:2201.07579 [hep-ph]]

    2022

  29. [37]

    Bhattacharya, A

    S. Bhattacharya, A. Metz, V. K. Ojha, J. Y. Tsai, J. Zhou: Exclusive double quarkonium production and generalized TMDs of gluons. Phys. Lett. B 833, 137383 (2022). [arXiv:1810.04137 [hep-ph]]

    2022

  30. [38]

    Boussarie, Y

    R. Boussarie, Y. Hatta, B. W. Xiao, F. Yuan: Probing the W eizs¨ acker-Williams gluon Wigner distribution inpp collisions. Phys. Rev. D 98, 074015 (2018). [arXiv:1806.05681 [hep-ph]]

    2018

  31. [39]

    Bhattacharya, D

    S. Bhattacharya, D. Zheng, J. Zhou: Accessing the gluon GTMD F 1,4 in exclusive π 0 production in ep collisions. Phys. Rev. D 109, 096029 (2024). [arXiv:2312.07511 [hep-ph]]

    2024

  32. [40]

    Primakoff: Photoproduction of neutral mesons in nucl ear electric fields and the mean life of the neutral meson

    H. Primakoff: Photoproduction of neutral mesons in nucl ear electric fields and the mean life of the neutral meson. Phys. Rev. 81, 899 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.81.899

    1951 doi

  33. [41]

    Liping, R

    G. Liping, R. Miskimen, A. Gasparian, J. Goity, W. Rong, C. Xurong: Primakoff Physics with an e-p Collider. Nucl. Phys. Rev. 31, 453–459 (2014). https://doi.org/10.11804/NuclPhysRev .31.04.453

    2014 doi

  34. [42]

    M. M. Kaskulov, U. Mosel: Primakoff production of π 0, η and η′ in the Coulomb field of a nucleus. Phys. Rev. C 84, 065206 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.06 5206 [arXiv:1103.2097 [nucl-th]]

    2011 doi

  35. [43]

    G. P. Lepage, S. J. Brodsky: Exclusive Processes in Pert urbative Quantum Chromodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 22, 2157 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.22.2157

    1980 doi

  36. [44]

    Khodjamirian: Form-factors of γ ∗ ρ → π and γ ∗ γ → π 0 transitions and light cone sum rules

    A. Khodjamirian: Form-factors of γ ∗ ρ → π and γ ∗ γ → π 0 transitions and light cone sum rules. Eur. Phys. J. C 6, 477–484 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s100520050357 [arXiv:hep-ph/9712451 [hep-ph]]

    1999 doi

  37. [45]

    Y. Jia, Z. Mo, J. Pan, J. Y. Zhang: Photoproduction of C-e ven quarkonia at the EIC and EicC. Phys. Rev. D 108, 016015 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.0 16015 [arXiv:2207.14171 [hep-ph]]

    2023 doi

  38. [46]

    Z. Lu, B. Q. Ma: Gluon Sivers function in a light-cone spe ctator model. Phys. Rev. D 94, 094022 (2016). [arXiv:1608.04114 [hep-ph]]

    2016

  39. [47]

    N. Kaur, H. Dahiya: T-even gluon TMDs of proton in light- cone spectator model. DAE Symp. Nucl. Phys. 64, 641–642 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    Bacchetta, F

    A. Bacchetta, F. G. Celiberto, M. Radici, P. Taels: Tran sverse-momentum-dependent gluon distribution functions in a spectator model. Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 733 (2020). [arXiv:2004.02320 [hep-ph]]

    2020

  41. [49]

    Bacchetta, F

    A. Bacchetta, F. G. Celiberto, M. Radici: T-odd gluon di stribution functions in a spectator model. Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 576 (2024). [arXiv:2402.04097 [hep-ph]]

    2024

  42. [50]

    Chakrabarti, P

    D. Chakrabarti, P. Choudhary, B. Gurjar, R. Kishore, T. Maji, C. Mondal, A. Mukherjee: Gluon distributions in the proton in a light-front spectator model. Phys. Rev. D 108, 014009 (2023). [arXiv:2303.09649 [hep-ph]]

    2023

  43. [51]

    C. Tan, Z. Lu: Gluon generalized parton distributions a nd angular momentum in a light-cone spectator model. Phys. Rev. D 108, 054038 (2023). [arXiv:2305.04111 [hep-ph]]

    2023

  44. [52]

    Chakrabarti, P

    D. Chakrabarti, P. Choudhary, B. Gurjar, T. Maji, C. Mon dal, A. Mukherjee: Gluon generalized parton distributions of the proton at nonzero skewness. Phys. Rev. D 109, 114040 (2024). [arXiv:2402.07514 [hep-ph]]

    2024

  45. [53]

    C. Tan, Z. Lu: Gluon Wigner distributions in a light-con e spectator model. Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 355 (2025). [arXiv:2310.19700 [hep-ph]]

    2025

  46. [54]

    S. J. Brodsky, D. S. Hwang, B. Q. Ma, I. Schmidt: Light con e representation of the spin and orbital angular momentum of relativistic composite systems. Nucl. Phys. B 593, 311–335 (2001). [arXiv:hep-ph/0003082 [hep-ph]]

    2001

  47. [55]

    R. D. Ball et al. [NNPDF Collaboration]: Parton distributions from high-pr ecision collider data. Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 663 (2017). [arXiv:1706.00428 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  48. [56]

    D’Alesio, F

    U. D’Alesio, F. Murgia, C. Pisano: Towards a first estima te of the gluon Sivers function from AN data in pp collisions at RHIC. JHEP 09, 119 (2015). [arXiv:1506.03081 [hep-ph]]

    2015

  49. [57]

    Anselmino, M

    M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, A. Kotzinian, S . Melis, F. Murgia, A. Prokudin, C. Turk: Sivers Effect for Pio n and Kaon Production in Semi-Inclusive Deep Inelastic Scatt ering. Eur. Phys. J. A 39, 89–100 (2009). [arXiv:0805.2637 [hep-ph]] 14

    2009

  50. [58]

    Adolph et al

    C. Adolph et al. [COMPASS Collaboration]: First measurement of the Sivers a symmetry for gluons using SIDIS data. Phys. Lett. B 772, 854–864 (2017). [arXiv:1702.02153 [hep-ex]]

    2017

  51. [59]

    Bacchetta, M

    A. Bacchetta, M. Boglione, A. Henneman, P. J. Mulders: B ounds on transverse momentum dependent distribution and fragmentation functions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 712–715 (2000). [arXiv:hep-ph/9912490 [hep-ph]]

    2000

  52. [60]

    P. J. Mulders, J. Rodrigues: Transverse momentum depen dence in gluon distribution and fragmentation functions. Phys. Rev. D 63, 094021 (2001). [arXiv:hep-ph/0009303 [hep-ph]]

    2001

  53. [61]

    Lorc´ e, B

    C. Lorc´ e, B. Pasquini: Structure analysis of the gener alized correlator of quark and gluon for a spin-1/2 target. JHEP 09, 138 (2013). [arXiv:1307.4483 [hep-ph]]

    2013

  54. [62]

    Mukherjee, S

    A. Mukherjee, S. Nair, V. K. Ojha: Wigner distributions for gluons in a light-front dressed quark model. Phys. Rev. D 91, 054018 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.0 54018 [arXiv:1501.03728 [hep-ph]]

    2015 doi

  55. [63]

    Kanazawa, C

    K. Kanazawa, C. Lorc´ e, A. Metz, B. Pasquini, M. Schlege l: Twist-2 generalized transverse-momentum de- pendent parton distributions and the spin/orbital structu re of the nucleon. Phys. Rev. D 90, 014028 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.014028 [arXiv:1403.5226 [hep-ph]]

    2014 doi

  56. [64]

    C. Tan, Z. Lu: Gluon GTMDs at nonzero skewness and impact parameter dependent parton distributions. Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 637 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024- 12976-3 [arXiv:2402.17162 [hep-ph]]

    2024 doi

  57. [65]

    Czyzewski, J

    J. Czyzewski, J. Kwiecinski, L. Motyka, M. Sadzikowski : Exclusive ηc photoproduction and electroproduction at HERA as a possible probe of the odderon singularity in QCD. Phys. Lett. B 398, 400–406 (1997); Erratum: Phys. Lett. B 411, 402 (1997). [arXiv:hep-ph/9610399 [hep-ph]]

    1997

  58. [66]

    Dumitru, T

    A. Dumitru, T. Stebel: Multiquark matrix elements in th e proton and three gluon exchange for exclusive ηc production in photon-proton diffractive scattering. Phys. Rev. D 99, 094038 (2019). [arXiv:1902.05070 [hep-ph]]

    2019

  59. [67]

    Engel, D

    R. Engel, D. Y. Ivanov, R. Kirschner, L. Szymanowski: Di ffractive meson production from virtual photons with odd charge-parity exchange. Eur. Phys. J. C 4, 93–99 (1998). [arXiv:hep-ph/9705307 [hep-ph]]

    1998

  60. [68]

    L. A. Harland-Lang, V. A. Khoze, A. D. Martin, M. G. Ryski n: Searching for the Odderon in Ultraperipheral Proton–Ion Collisions at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D 99, 034011 (2019). [arXiv:1811.05478 [hep-ph]]

    2019

  61. [69]

    Boussarie, Y

    R. Boussarie, Y. Hatta, L. Szymanowski, S. Wallon: Prob ing the Gluon Sivers Function with an Unpolarized Target: GTMD Distributions and the Odderons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 172501 (2020). [arXiv:1910.03699 [hep-ph]]

    2020

  62. [70]

    D. Boer, M. G. Echevarria, P. Mulders, J. Zhou: Single sp in asymmetries from a single Wilson loop. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 122001 (2016). [arXiv:1509.03242 [hep-ph]]

    2016

  63. [71]

    Zhou: Transverse single spin asymmetries at small x a nd the anomalous magnetic moment

    J. Zhou: Transverse single spin asymmetries at small x a nd the anomalous magnetic moment. Phys. Rev. D 89, 074050 (2014). [arXiv:1311.1386 [hep-ph]]

    2014

  64. [72]

    C. J. Bomhof, P. J. Mulders: Non-universality of transv erse momentum dependent parton distribution functions. Nucl. Phys. B 795, 409–427 (2008). [arXiv:0709.2871 [hep-ph]]

    2008

  65. [73]

    C. J. Bomhof, P. J. Mulders, F. Pijlman: The Constructio n of gauge-links in arbitrary hard processes. Eur. Phys. J. C 47, 147–162 (2006). [arXiv:hep-ph/0601171 [hep-ph]]

    2006

  66. [74]

    M. G. A. Buffing, A. Mukherjee, P. J. Mulders: Generalized Universality of Definite Rank Gluon Transverse Momentum Dependent Correlators. Phys. Rev. D 88, 054027 (2013). [arXiv:1305.5973 [hep-ph]]

    2013

  67. [75]

    Pisano, D

    C. Pisano, D. Boer, S. J. Brodsky, M. G. A. Buffing, P. J. Mul ders: Linear polarization of gluons and photons in unpolarized collider experiments. JHEP 10, 024 (2013). [arXiv:1307.3421 [hep-ph]]

    2013

  68. [76]

    D. Boer, W. J. den Dunnen, C. Pisano, M. Schlegel: Determ ining the Higgs spin and parity in the diphoton decay channel . Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 032002 (2013). [arXiv:1304.2614 [hep-ph]]

    2013

  69. [77]

    M. G. Echevarria, T. Kasemets, P. J. Mulders, C. Pisano: QCD evolution of (un)polarized gluon TMDPDFs and the Higgs qT -distribution. JHEP 07, 158 (2015); Erratum: JHEP 05, 073 (2017). [arXiv:1502.00672 [hep-ph]]

    2015

  70. [78]

    Dominguez, B

    F. Dominguez, B. W. Xiao, F. Yuan: kt-factorization for Hard Processes in Nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 022301 (2011). [arXiv:1009.2141 [hep-ph]]

    2011

  71. [79]

    Dominguez, C

    F. Dominguez, C. Marquet, B. W. Xiao, F. Yuan: Universal ity of Unintegrated Gluon Distributions at small x. Phys. Rev. D 83, 105005 (2011). [arXiv:1101.0795 [hep-ph]]

    2011

  72. [80]

    Bacchetta, C

    A. Bacchetta, C. Bomhof, U. D’Alesio, P. J. Mulders, F. M urgia: The Sivers single-spin asymmetry in photon-jet production. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 212002 (2007). [arXiv:0707.2074 [hep-ph]]

    2007

  73. [81]

    M. G. A. Buffing, Z. B. Kang, K. Lee, X. Liu: A transverse mom entum dependent framework for back-to-back photon+jet production. [arXiv:1812.07549 [hep-ph]] (2018)

    2018

  74. [82]

    D. Boer, C. Lorc´ e, C. Pisano, J. Zhou: The gluon Sivers d istribution: status and future prospects. Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015, 371396 (2015). [arXiv:1504.01367 [hep-ph]]

    2015

  75. [83]

    Meissner, A

    S. Meissner, A. Metz, K. Goeke: Relations between gener alized and transverse momentum dependent parton distribut ions. Phys. Rev. D 76, 034002 (2007). [arXiv:0704.1591 [hep-ph]]

    2007

  76. [84]

    L. L. Frankfurt, P. V. Pobylitsa, M. V. Polyakov, M. Stri kman: Hard exclusive pseudoscalar meson electroproductio n and spin structure of a nucleon. Phys. Rev. D 60, 014010 (1999). [arXiv:hep-ph/9812359 [hep-ph]]

    1999

  77. [85]

    Z. Lu, I. Schmidt: Connection between the Sivers functi on and the anomalous magnetic moment. Phys. Rev. D 75, 073008 (2007). [arXiv:hep-ph/0612013 [hep-ph]]

    2007

  78. [86]

    Bacchetta, F

    A. Bacchetta, F. Conti, M. Radici: Transverse-momentu m distributions in a diquark spectator model. Phys. Rev. D 78, 074010 (2008). [arXiv:0805.2353 [hep-ph]]

    2008

  79. [87]

    Goeke, S

    K. Goeke, S. Meissner, A. Metz, M. Schlegel: Checking th e Burkardt sum rule for the Sivers function by model calculat ions. Phys. Lett. B 637, 241–244 (2006). [arXiv:hep-ph/0602030 [hep-ph]]

    2006

  80. [88]

    Alexandrou, S

    C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, M. Constantinou, J. Finkenr ath, K. Hadjiyiannakou, K. Jansen, G. Koutsou, H. Panagopou los, G. Spanoudes: Complete flavor decomposition of the spin and m omentum fraction of the proton using lattice QCD 15 simulations at physical pion mass. Phys. Rev...

    2020

  81. [89]

    Adolph et al

    C. Adolph et al. [COMPASS Collaboration]: Leading-order determination of the gluon polarisation from semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering data. Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 209 (2017). [arXiv:1510.08069 [hep-ex]]

    2017

  82. [90]

    E. S. Ageev et al. [COMPASS Collaboration]: Gluon polarization in the nucleo n from quasi-real photoproduction of high-pT hadron pairs. Phys. Lett. B 633, 25–32 (2006). [arXiv:hep-ex/0511029 [hep-ex]]

    2006

  83. [91]

    Adolph et al

    C. Adolph et al. [COMPASS Collaboration]: Leading and Next-to-Leading Ord er Gluon Polarization in the Nucleon and Longitudinal Double Spin Asymmetries from Open Charm Mu oproduction. Phys. Rev. D 87, 052018 (2013). [arXiv:1205.5123 [hep-ex]]

    2013

  84. [92]

    Airapetian et al

    A. Airapetian et al. [HERMES Collaboration]: Leading-Order Determination of t he Gluon Polarization from high- pT Hadron Electroproduction. JHEP 08, 130 (2010). [arXiv:1005.4073 [hep-ex]]

    2010

  85. [93]

    Adeva et al

    B. Adeva et al. [Spin Muon (SMC) Collaboration]: Spin asymmetries for even ts with high pT hadrons in DIS and an evaluation of the gluon polarization. Phys. Rev. D 70, 012002 (2004) [arXiv:hep-ex/0402010 [hep-ex]]

    2004

  86. [94]

    Adare et al

    A. Adare et al. [PHENIX Collaboration]: The Polarized gluon contribution to the proton spin from the double helicity asymmetry in inclusive π 0 production in polarized p + p collisions at √ s = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 012003 (2009). [arXiv:0801.2990 [nucl-ex]]

    2009

  87. [95]

    R. S. Sufian, T. Liu, A. Paul: Gluon distributions and the ir applications to Ioffe-time distributions. Phys. Rev. D 103, 036007 (2021). [arXiv:2011.01279 [hep-ph]]

    2021

  88. [96]

    Y. B. Yang, R. S. Sufian, A. Alexandru, T. Draper, M. J. Gla tzmaier, K. F. Liu, Y. Zhao: Glue Spin and Helicity in the Proton from Lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 102001 (2017). [arXiv:1612.01540 [hep-lat]]

    2017

  89. [97]

    S. J. Brodsky, I. A. Schmidt: Polarized and Unpolarized Intrinsic Gluon Distributions. Phys. Lett. B 234, 144–150 (1990)

    1990

  90. [98]

    S. J. Brodsky, M. Burkardt, I. Schmidt: Perturbative QC D constraints on the shape of polarized quark and gluon distributions. Nucl. Phys. B 441, 197–214 (1995). [arXiv:hep-ph/9406365 [hep-ph]]

    1995

  91. [99]

    Kotzinian: SIDIS Asymmetries in Quark-Diquark Mode l

    A. Kotzinian: SIDIS Asymmetries in Quark-Diquark Mode l. [arXiv:0806.3804 [hep-ph]] (2008)

    2008

  92. [100]

    Pasquini, P

    B. Pasquini, P. Schweitzer: Naive time-reversal odd ph enomena in semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering from light-cone constituent quark models. Phys. Rev. D 83, 114044 (2011). [arXiv:1103.4179 [hep-ph]]

    2011

  93. [101]

    E. R. Berger, A. Donnachie, H. G. Dosch, W. Kilian, O. Nac htmann, M. Rueter: Odderon and photon exchange in electroproduction of pseudoscalar mesons. Eur. Phys. J. C 9, 491–501 (1999). [arXiv:hep-ph/9903341 [hep-ph]]

    1999

  94. [102]

    H. Li, Z. Lu: The sin 2 φ h azimuthal asymmetry of pion production in SIDIS within TMD f actorization. Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 668 (2022). [arXiv:2111.03371 [hep-ph]]

    2022

  95. [103]

    S. V. Goloskokov, P. Kroll: The Role of the quark and gluo n GPDs in hard vector-meson electroproduction. Eur. Phys. J. C 53, 367–384 (2008). [arXiv:0708.3541 [hep-ph]]

    2008

  96. [104]

    S. V. Goloskokov, P. Kroll: Vector meson electroprodu ction at small Bjorken- x and generalized parton distributions. Eur. Phys. J. C 42, 281–301 (2005). [arXiv:hep-ph/0503047 [hep-ph]]

    2005

  97. [105]

    I. V. Anikin, O. V. Teryaev: Genuine twist three in excl usive electroproduction of transversely polarized vector mesons. Phys. Lett. B 554, 51–63 (2003). [arXiv:hep-ph/0209199 [hep-ph]]

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed May 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.