arxiv: 2604.10738 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-12 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Accessing gluon GTMD F^g_{1,4} via the langlesin(2φ)rangle azimuthal asymmetry of exclusive π⁰ production in ep collisions

Chentao Tan , Zhun Lu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords gluon GTMDazimuthal asymmetryexclusive pion productionspin asymmetryPrimakoff processelectron-ion colliderlight-front spectator model

0 comments

The pith

The sin(2φ) azimuthal asymmetry in exclusive neutral pion production probes the imaginary part of gluon GTMD F^g_{1,4}.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes that the longitudinal single-target spin asymmetry in exclusive π⁰ production in ep collisions serves as a sensitive probe of the imaginary part of the gluon generalized transverse momentum dependent distribution F^g_{1,4}. The asymmetry shows up as a sin(2φ) correlation between the scattered electron and recoil proton momenta, generated by interference between Coulomb and nuclear amplitudes. The authors compute the relevant gluon distributions using a light-front spectator model of the proton that includes explicit gluonic degrees of freedom. They deliver the first model calculation of Im(F^g_{1,4}) together with numerical predictions for the asymmetry at kinematics relevant to the planned Electron-Ion Colliders. A sympathetic reader would care because GTMDs encode detailed three-dimensional information on gluon distributions inside the proton, which future colliders aim to map.

Core claim

The longitudinal single-target spin asymmetry in exclusive π⁰ production in ep collisions appears as a characteristic sin(2φ) azimuthal correlation due to Coulomb-nuclear interference and is therefore sensitive to the imaginary part of the gluon GTMD F^g_{1,4}. The Primakoff process must be included. The authors compute the gluon distributions in a light-front spectator model with explicit gluonic degrees of freedom, present the first model calculation of Im(F^g_{1,4}), and give predictions for the resulting asymmetries at EIC and EicC kinematics.

What carries the argument

The gluon GTMD F^g_{1,4} (specifically its imaginary part), accessed through the sin(2φ) azimuthal spin asymmetry generated by Coulomb-nuclear interference in the Primakoff process.

If this is right

The sin(2φ) asymmetry provides a concrete experimental handle on a previously uncalculated gluon GTMD component.
Accurate predictions require explicit inclusion of the Primakoff process alongside the nuclear contribution.
The light-front model supplies first numerical values for Im(F^g_{1,4}) that can be directly compared with data.
Predictions are available for the kinematics expected at the Electron-Ion Collider and the proposed EicC.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Confirmation at the EIC would open a new experimental channel for mapping the three-dimensional gluon structure of the proton at moderate x.
The same interference mechanism could be examined in other exclusive meson channels to constrain additional GTMD components.
If the spectator model is validated here, it could be applied to related observables such as single-spin asymmetries in other processes.

Load-bearing premise

The light-front spectator model with explicit gluonic degrees of freedom correctly captures the non-perturbative gluon dynamics that determine Im(F^g_{1,4}).

What would settle it

A measurement of the sin(2φ) azimuthal asymmetry in exclusive π⁰ electroproduction at EIC energies that differs substantially in magnitude or sign from the model's numerical predictions would show that the asymmetry does not probe Im(F^g_{1,4}) as calculated here.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10738 by Chentao Tan, Zhun Lu.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. The fitting of the model result in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Left: Model prediction for the gluon helicity PDF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. The dependence of the canonical gluon OAM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. The dependence of the gluon Sivers function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Coulomb-nuclear interference contribution to the e [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. The azimuthal asymmetries [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The longitudinal single-target spin asymmetry in exclusive $\pi^0$ production in $ep$ collisions is a sensitive probe of the imaginary part of the gluon generalized transverse momentum dependent distribution $F_{1,4}^g$. It appears as a characteristic $\sin(2\phi)$ azimuthal correlation between the transverse momenta of the scattered electron and the recoil proton, generated by Coulomb-nuclear interference; consequently, the Primakoff process should be included. We compute the relevant gluon distributions in a light-front spectator model of the proton that explicitly incorporates gluonic degrees of freedom. This work presents the first model calculation of the imaginary part of $F_{1,4}^g$ and delivers predictions for the resulting asymmetries in kinematics relevant to the planned Electron-Ion Colliders (EIC and EicC), providing theoretical predictions for upcoming measurements.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives the first model calculation of Im(F^g_{1,4}) in a light-front spectator setup and folds it into predictions for the sin(2φ) asymmetry in exclusive π⁰ production at EIC kinematics.

read the letter

This paper's main contribution is the first model calculation of the imaginary part of the gluon GTMD F^g_{1,4} using a light-front spectator approach with explicit gluons. They then use that to predict the sin(2φ) azimuthal asymmetry in exclusive neutral pion production off a longitudinally polarized proton in ep collisions at EIC energies. The abstract makes clear that this is new work on that specific component. What works is the clear link they draw between the GTMD and the observable. The asymmetry arises from interference between the Bethe-Heitler and Primakoff processes, and the model gives concrete numbers for the asymmetry in the relevant kinematics. That's useful for experimental planning at the EIC and EicC. The limitation is that the results depend entirely on the spectator model's assumptions about gluon dynamics. There are no comparisons shown to lattice QCD results for related gluon distributions or to other observables that could test the same model. So the predicted size of the asymmetry remains a model output rather than something anchored in data or first-principles calculations. The stress-test note on missing cross-checks holds up based on what is described. This kind of work is for the small group of theorists focused on GTMDs and their extraction at future colliders. A reader interested in proton structure at the EIC would find the predictions worth looking at, even if they treat the numbers as illustrative. I would recommend sending it to peer review. The calculation is specific enough that referees can evaluate the model choices and the formalism without it being a major lift.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the longitudinal single-target spin asymmetry in exclusive π⁰ production in ep collisions appears as a ⟨sin(2φ)⟩ azimuthal asymmetry generated by Coulomb-nuclear interference in the Primakoff process, thereby providing access to the imaginary part of the gluon GTMD F^g_{1,4}. The authors compute this distribution for the first time in a light-front spectator model of the proton that includes explicit gluonic degrees of freedom and present numerical predictions for the asymmetry in EIC and EicC kinematics.

Significance. If the model evaluation of Im(F^g_{1,4}) is reliable, the work supplies the first quantitative predictions for a novel observable that could be measured at future electron-ion colliders, offering a potential new probe of gluon transverse-momentum-dependent structure beyond standard GPDs.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (light-front spectator model): The computation of Im(F^g_{1,4}) rests entirely on this model, yet the manuscript provides no comparison of the same framework to lattice QCD moments of gluon distributions, unpolarized GTMDs, or any other gluon-sensitive observable that can be confronted with existing data. This absence leaves the magnitude and sign of the predicted asymmetry as an unanchored model output rather than a robust extraction.
[§5] §5 (numerical predictions): The asymmetry results at EIC/EicC kinematics are presented as direct consequences of the model; without external validation or uncertainty estimates tied to model assumptions, it is unclear whether the claimed sensitivity can be translated into a reliable extraction strategy once data arrive.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that the Primakoff process 'should be included' but does not quantify its relative contribution to the sin(2φ) term versus other mechanisms; a brief estimate in the introduction would improve clarity.
[Introduction] Notation for the GTMD F^g_{1,4} is introduced without an explicit reference to the standard parametrization (e.g., the relation to the gluon helicity flip amplitude); adding one sentence with the defining equation would aid readers unfamiliar with the GTMD literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional discussion and uncertainty estimates where feasible, while noting the limitations inherent to this being the first calculation of Im(F^g_{1,4}).

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (light-front spectator model): The computation of Im(F^g_{1,4}) rests entirely on this model, yet the manuscript provides no comparison of the same framework to lattice QCD moments of gluon distributions, unpolarized GTMDs, or any other gluon-sensitive observable that can be confronted with existing data. This absence leaves the magnitude and sign of the predicted asymmetry as an unanchored model output rather than a robust extraction.

Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from explicit context on the model's prior validations. The light-front spectator model with explicit gluons has been used in our previous works to compute unpolarized gluon GTMDs and related quantities, where it reproduces known limits and is constrained by phenomenological inputs. However, because Im(F^g_{1,4}) has no existing lattice QCD results or data for direct comparison, such benchmarks are not yet possible. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph referencing our earlier validations of the same framework for gluon distributions and explain that the sign of the asymmetry is fixed by the model's Dirac structure rather than free parameters. We view this as sufficient anchoring for a first theoretical study while acknowledging that full lattice comparisons remain a future goal. revision: partial
Referee: [§5] §5 (numerical predictions): The asymmetry results at EIC/EicC kinematics are presented as direct consequences of the model; without external validation or uncertainty estimates tied to model assumptions, it is unclear whether the claimed sensitivity can be translated into a reliable extraction strategy once data arrive.

Authors: We accept that uncertainty quantification would improve the utility of the predictions. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection estimating theoretical uncertainties by varying the model parameters within ranges fixed by our prior fits to other gluon observables. We will also expand the discussion to outline a possible extraction strategy, emphasizing that the sin(2φ) asymmetry provides direct access to Im(F^g_{1,4}) via Coulomb-nuclear interference and that its qualitative features are stable under reasonable parameter changes. These additions should clarify how the observable can be used once data become available. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Light-front spectator model computation of Im(F^g_{1,4}) is self-contained with no reduction to fitted inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper defines a light-front spectator model with explicit gluonic degrees of freedom, computes the gluon GTMD F^g_{1,4} (specifically its imaginary part) from that model, and then uses the result to predict the sin(2φ) asymmetry in exclusive π⁰ production. This is a standard forward model calculation: the model is specified independently of the target observable, the GTMD follows directly from the model's wave functions or overlaps, and the asymmetry is obtained by inserting the computed distribution into the standard cross-section formula. No equations reduce the final prediction to a fit of the same data, no uniqueness theorem is imported from prior self-work, and no ansatz is smuggled via citation. The abstract explicitly frames the work as 'the first model calculation,' confirming the derivation chain is open and falsifiable against future data rather than tautological. Therefore no circular steps exist.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; the claim rests on the unstated details of the light-front spectator model (wave-function ansatz, gluon inclusion, spectator mass, etc.) and on the assumption that Coulomb-nuclear interference generates the sin(2φ) term.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Light-front spectator model with explicit gluonic degrees of freedom accurately represents the proton's gluon GTMDs
Invoked to compute F^g_{1,4}; no justification or validation given in abstract

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5460 in / 1258 out tokens · 24866 ms · 2026-05-10T15:47:08.136707+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 96 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

[1]

(22) 6 As a complex-valued function, F g 1, 4 = ReF g 1, 4 +iImF g 1, 4

via the helicity diﬀerence: W↑↑ − W↓↓ = 2iǫij ⊥ ki ⊥ ∆ j ⊥ M 2 √ 1 − ξ2 F g 1, 4. (22) 6 As a complex-valued function, F g 1, 4 = ReF g 1, 4 +iImF g 1, 4. As mentioned in Ref. [ 27], the imaginary part of the gluon GTMD F g 1, 2 is linked to the Sivers function in the forward limit ( ξ → 0, ∆ ⊥ → 0) via ImF g 1, 2(x, 0, k2 ⊥ , 0, 0) = −f ⊥ g 1T (x, k2 ⊥ )...
[2]

We use 1000 data points in the range 0

to the NNPDF3.1 dataset for xf g 1 (x) [ 51] at the initial scale µ 0 = 2 GeV. We use 1000 data points in the range 0 . 001 ≤ x ≤ 1 (step size 0.001). Simultaneous ﬁtting of the unpolarized and helicity PDFs to NNPDF3.1 a nd NNPDFpol1.1 [ 10] was attempted but yielded signiﬁcant deviations in the small- x region (0. 001 < x <0. 01), so we focus on the unp...
[3]

(35) From the ﬁgure, one can observe that the peak magnitude decrea ses and shifts to larger k⊥ asx increases

3, while the right panel displays the ﬁrst transverse moment of the gluon sivers function deﬁned as f ⊥ (1)g 1T (x) = ∫ d2k⊥ k2 ⊥ 2M 2f ⊥ g 1T (x, k2 ⊥ ). (35) From the ﬁgure, one can observe that the peak magnitude decrea ses and shifts to larger k⊥ asx increases. The Sivers function in our model is negative in the entire x region, consistent with the ex...
[4]

We also set α s = 0

In the forward and perturbative- Q2 limit the Odderon-induced cross section can be written as [ 35] dσ Odderon dtdQ2dxB ≈ π 5α 2 emα 2 sf 2 π 8xBN 2cM 2Q6 [ 1 − y + y2 2 ][ ∫ 1 0 dz φ π (z) z(1 − z) ∫ d2k⊥ k2 ⊥xf ⊥ g(d) 1T (x, k2 ⊥ ) k2 ⊥ +z(1 − z)Q2 ] 2 , (37) where Nc = 3, α em = 1/ 137, and fπ = 131 MeV is the π 0 decay constant. We also set α s = 0. 3...
[5]

Ashman et al

J. Ashman et al. [European Muon Collaboration]: A Measurement of the Spin As ymmetry and Determination of the Structure Function g(1) in Deep Inelastic Muon-Proton Scat tering. Phys. Lett. B 206, 364 (1988)

1988
[6]

R. L. Jaﬀe, A. Manohar: The g1 Problem: Fact and Fantasy on the Spin of the Proton. Nucl. Phys. B 337, 509–546 (1990)

1990
[7]

X. D. Ji: Gauge-Invariant Decomposition of Nucleon Spin . Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 610–613 (1997). [arXiv:hep-ph/9603249 [hep-ph]]

work page Pith review arXiv 1997
[8]

The angular momentum controversy: What's it all about and does it matter?

E. Leader, C. Lorc´ e: The angular momentum controversy: What’s it all about and does it matter? Phys. Rept. 541, 163–248 (2014). [arXiv:1309.4235 [hep-ph]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[9]

K. F. Liu, C. Lorc´ e: The Parton Orbital Angular Momentum : Status and Prospects. Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 160 (2016). [arXiv:1512.06699 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[10]

X. Ji, F. Yuan, Y. Zhao: What we know and what we don’t know a bout the proton spin after 30 years. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 27–38 (2021). [arXiv:2008.09552 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2021
[11]

Leader: Role of the subsidiary ﬁelds in the momentum an d angular momentum in covariantly quantized QED and QCD

E. Leader: Role of the subsidiary ﬁelds in the momentum an d angular momentum in covariantly quantized QED and QCD. Phys. Rev. D 105, 036005 (2022). [arXiv:2111.03369 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2022
[12]

Ashman et al

J. Ashman et al. [European Muon Collaboration]: An Investigation of the Spi n Structure of the Proton in Deep Inelastic Scattering of Polarized Muons on Polarized Protons. Nucl. Phys. B 328, 1 (1989)

1989
[13]

Extraction of Spin-Dependent Parton Densities and Their Uncertainties

D. de Florian, R. Sassot, M. Stratmann, W. Vogelsang: Ext raction of Spin-Dependent Parton Densities and Their Uncertainties. Phys. Rev. D 80, 034030 (2009). [arXiv:0904.3821 [hep-ph]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2009
[14]

E. R. Nocera et al. [NNPDF Collaboration]: A ﬁrst unbiased global determinati on of polarized PDFs and their uncer- tainties. Nucl. Phys. B 887, 276–308 (2014). [arXiv:1406.5539 [hep-ph]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[15]

J. J. Ethier, N. Sato, W. Melnitchouk: First simultaneo us extraction of spin-dependent parton distributions and f rag- mentation functions from a global QCD analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 132001 (2017). [arXiv:1705.05889 [hep-ph]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[16]

Adamczyk et al

L. Adamczyk et al. [STAR Collaboration]: Precision Measurement of the Longit udinal Double-spin Asymmetry for Inclu- sive Jet Production in Polarized Proton Collisions at √ s = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 092002 (2015). [arXiv:1406.3801 [nucl-ex]]

work page arXiv 2015
[17]

Evidence for polarization of gluons in the proton

D. de Florian, R. Sassot, M. Stratmann, W. Vogelsang: Ev idence for polarization of gluons in the proton. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 012001 (2014). [arXiv:1404.4293 [hep-ph]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[18]

M. S. Abdallah et al. [STAR Collaboration]: Longitudinal double-spin asymmetr y for inclusive jet and dijet production in polarized proton collisions at √ s = 510 GeV. Phys. Rev. D 105, 092011 (2022). [arXiv:2112.01435 [nucl-ex]]

work page arXiv 2022
[19]

D. Boer, M. Diehl, R. Milner, R. Venugopalan, W. Vogelsa ng, D. Kaplan, H. Montgomery, S. Vigdor, A. Accardi, E. C. Aschenauer et al. : Gluons and the quark sea at high energies: Distributions, p olarization, tomography. [arXiv:1108.1713 [nucl-th]] (2011)

work page arXiv 2011
[20]

Abdul Khalek, A

R. Abdul Khalek, A. Accardi, J. Adam, D. Adamiak, W. Aker s, M. Albaladejo, A. Al-bataineh, M. G. Alexeev, F. Ameli, P. Antonioli et al. : Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electr on-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report. Nucl. Phys. A 1026, 122447 (2022). [arXiv:2103.05455 [physics.ins-det]]

work page arXiv 2022
[21]

E. C. Aschenauer, I. Balitsky, L. Bland, S. J. Brodsky, M . Burkardt, V. Burkert, J. P. Chen, A. Deshpande, M. Diehl, L. Gamberg et al. : Pre-Town Meeting on Spin Physics at an Electron-Ion Collid er. Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 71 (2017). [arXiv:1409.1633 [nucl-ex]]

work page arXiv 2017
[22]

X. D. Ji: Deeply virtual Compton scattering. Phys. Rev. D 55, 7114–7125 (1997). [arXiv:hep-ph/9609381 [hep-ph]]

work page Pith review arXiv 1997
[23]

J. C. Collins, L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman: Factorizatio n for hard exclusive electroproduction of mesons in QCD. Phys. Rev. D 56, 2982–3006 (1997). [arXiv:hep-ph/9611433 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 1997
[24]

Lorc´ e, B

C. Lorc´ e, B. Pasquini: Quark Wigner Distributions and Orbital Angular Momentum. Phys. Rev. D 84, 014015 (2011). [arXiv:1104.4687 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2011
[25]

Hatta: Notes on the orbital angular momentum of quark s in the nucleon

Y. Hatta: Notes on the orbital angular momentum of quark s in the nucleon. Phys. Lett. B 708, 186–190 (2012). [arXiv:1111.3278 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2012
[26]

Lorc´ e, B

C. Lorc´ e, B. Pasquini, X. Xiong, F. Yuan: The quark orbi tal angular momentum from Wigner distributions and light-c one wave functions. Phys. Rev. D 85, 114006 (2012). [arXiv:1111.4827 [hep-ph]] 13

work page arXiv 2012
[27]

M. A. Ebert, J. K. L. Michel, I. W. Stewart, Z. Sun: Disent angling long and short distances in momentum-space TMDs. JHEP 07, 129 (2022). [arXiv:2202.00691 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[28]

Bertone: Matching generalised transverse-momentu m-dependent distributions onto generalised parton distri butions at one loop

V. Bertone: Matching generalised transverse-momentu m-dependent distributions onto generalised parton distri butions at one loop. Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 941 (2022). [arXiv:2206.02870 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[29]

M. G. Echevarria, P. A. Gutierrez Garcia, I. Scimemi: GT MDs and the factorization of exclusive double Drell-Yan. Phys. Lett. B 840, 137881 (2023). [arXiv:2207.10089 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2023
[30]

Hidden symmetries, null geodesics, and photon capture in the Sen black hole,

S. Meissner, A. Metz, M. Schlegel, K. Goeke: Generalize d parton correlation functions for a spin-0 hadron. JHEP 08, 038 (2008). [arXiv:0805.3146 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2008
[31]

Meissner, A

S. Meissner, A. Metz, M. Schlegel: Generalized parton c orrelation functions for a spin-1/2 hadron. JHEP 08, 056 (2009). [arXiv:0906.5323 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2009
[32]

Bhattacharya, A

S. Bhattacharya, A. Metz, J. Zhou: Generalized TMDs and the exclusive double Drell–Yan process. Phys. Lett. B 771, 396–400 (2017); Erratum: Phys. Lett. B 810, 135866 (2020). [arXiv:1703.08260 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2017
[33]

Bhattacharya, D

S. Bhattacharya, D. Zheng, J. Zhou: Probing the Quark Or bital Angular Momentum at Electron-Ion Colliders Using Exclusive π 0 Production. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 051901 (2024). [arXiv:2308.10859 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2024
[34]

X. Ji, F. Yuan, Y. Zhao: Hunting the Gluon Orbital Angula r Momentum at the Electron-Ion Collider. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 192004 (2017). [arXiv:1611.00011 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2017
[35]

Hatta, Y

Y. Hatta, Y. Nakagawa, F. Yuan, Y. Zhao, B. Xiao: Gluon or bital angular momentum at small- x. Phys. Rev. D 95, 114032 (2017). [arXiv:1612.02437 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2017
[36]

Bhattacharya, R

S. Bhattacharya, R. Boussarie, Y. Hatta: Signature of t he Gluon Orbital Angular Momentum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 182002 (2022). [arXiv:2201.07579 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[37]

Bhattacharya, A

S. Bhattacharya, A. Metz, V. K. Ojha, J. Y. Tsai, J. Zhou: Exclusive double quarkonium production and generalized TMDs of gluons. Phys. Lett. B 833, 137383 (2022). [arXiv:1810.04137 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[38]

Boussarie, Y

R. Boussarie, Y. Hatta, B. W. Xiao, F. Yuan: Probing the W eizs¨ acker-Williams gluon Wigner distribution inpp collisions. Phys. Rev. D 98, 074015 (2018). [arXiv:1806.05681 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2018
[39]

and Joshi, Chaitanya K and Schmidt, Victor and Miret, Santiago and Malliaros, Fragkiskos D

S. Bhattacharya, D. Zheng, J. Zhou: Accessing the gluon GTMD F 1,4 in exclusive π 0 production in ep collisions. Phys. Rev. D 109, 096029 (2024). [arXiv:2312.07511 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2024
[40]

Primakoﬀ: Photoproduction of neutral mesons in nucl ear electric ﬁelds and the mean life of the neutral meson

H. Primakoﬀ: Photoproduction of neutral mesons in nucl ear electric ﬁelds and the mean life of the neutral meson. Phys. Rev. 81, 899 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.81.899

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.81.899 1951
[41]

Liping, R

G. Liping, R. Miskimen, A. Gasparian, J. Goity, W. Rong, C. Xurong: Primakoﬀ Physics with an e-p Collider. Nucl. Phys. Rev. 31, 453–459 (2014). https://doi.org/10.11804/NuclPhysRev .31.04.453

work page doi:10.11804/nuclphysrev 2014
[42]

M. M. Kaskulov, U. Mosel: Primakoﬀ production of π 0, η and η′ in the Coulomb ﬁeld of a nucleus. Phys. Rev. C 84, 065206 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.06 5206 [arXiv:1103.2097 [nucl-th]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.84.06 2011
[43]

G. P. Lepage, S. J. Brodsky: Exclusive Processes in Pert urbative Quantum Chromodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 22, 2157 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.22.2157

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.22.2157 1980
[44]

Khodjamirian: Form-factors of γ ∗ ρ → π and γ ∗ γ → π 0 transitions and light cone sum rules

A. Khodjamirian: Form-factors of γ ∗ ρ → π and γ ∗ γ → π 0 transitions and light cone sum rules. Eur. Phys. J. C 6, 477–484 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s100520050357 [arXiv:hep-ph/9712451 [hep-ph]]

work page doi:10.1007/s100520050357 1999
[45]

Y. Jia, Z. Mo, J. Pan, J. Y. Zhang: Photoproduction of C-e ven quarkonia at the EIC and EicC. Phys. Rev. D 108, 016015 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.0 16015 [arXiv:2207.14171 [hep-ph]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.0 2023
[46]

Z. Lu, B. Q. Ma: Gluon Sivers function in a light-cone spe ctator model. Phys. Rev. D 94, 094022 (2016). [arXiv:1608.04114 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[47]

N. Kaur, H. Dahiya: T-even gluon TMDs of proton in light- cone spectator model. DAE Symp. Nucl. Phys. 64, 641–642 (2019)

2019
[48]

Bacchetta, F

A. Bacchetta, F. G. Celiberto, M. Radici, P. Taels: Tran sverse-momentum-dependent gluon distribution functions in a spectator model. Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 733 (2020). [arXiv:2004.02320 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2020
[49]

Bacchetta, F

A. Bacchetta, F. G. Celiberto, M. Radici: T-odd gluon di stribution functions in a spectator model. Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 576 (2024). [arXiv:2402.04097 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2024
[50]

Chakrabarti, P

D. Chakrabarti, P. Choudhary, B. Gurjar, R. Kishore, T. Maji, C. Mondal, A. Mukherjee: Gluon distributions in the proton in a light-front spectator model. Phys. Rev. D 108, 014009 (2023). [arXiv:2303.09649 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2023
[51]

C. Tan, Z. Lu: Gluon generalized parton distributions a nd angular momentum in a light-cone spectator model. Phys. Rev. D 108, 054038 (2023). [arXiv:2305.04111 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2023
[52]

Chakrabarti, P

D. Chakrabarti, P. Choudhary, B. Gurjar, T. Maji, C. Mon dal, A. Mukherjee: Gluon generalized parton distributions of the proton at nonzero skewness. Phys. Rev. D 109, 114040 (2024). [arXiv:2402.07514 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2024
[53]

C. Tan, Z. Lu: Gluon Wigner distributions in a light-con e spectator model. Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 355 (2025). [arXiv:2310.19700 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2025
[54]

S. J. Brodsky, D. S. Hwang, B. Q. Ma, I. Schmidt: Light con e representation of the spin and orbital angular momentum of relativistic composite systems. Nucl. Phys. B 593, 311–335 (2001). [arXiv:hep-ph/0003082 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2001
[55]

R. D. Ball et al. [NNPDF Collaboration]: Parton distributions from high-pr ecision collider data. Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 663 (2017). [arXiv:1706.00428 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[56]

Pozas-Kerstjens and E

U. D’Alesio, F. Murgia, C. Pisano: Towards a ﬁrst estima te of the gluon Sivers function from AN data in pp collisions at RHIC. JHEP 09, 119 (2015). [arXiv:1506.03081 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2015
[57]

Anselmino, M

M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, A. Kotzinian, S . Melis, F. Murgia, A. Prokudin, C. Turk: Sivers Eﬀect for Pio n and Kaon Production in Semi-Inclusive Deep Inelastic Scatt ering. Eur. Phys. J. A 39, 89–100 (2009). [arXiv:0805.2637 [hep-ph]] 14

work page arXiv 2009
[58]

Adolph et al

C. Adolph et al. [COMPASS Collaboration]: First measurement of the Sivers a symmetry for gluons using SIDIS data. Phys. Lett. B 772, 854–864 (2017). [arXiv:1702.02153 [hep-ex]]

work page arXiv 2017
[59]

Bacchetta, M

A. Bacchetta, M. Boglione, A. Henneman, P. J. Mulders: B ounds on transverse momentum dependent distribution and fragmentation functions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 712–715 (2000). [arXiv:hep-ph/9912490 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2000
[60]

P. J. Mulders, J. Rodrigues: Transverse momentum depen dence in gluon distribution and fragmentation functions. Phys. Rev. D 63, 094021 (2001). [arXiv:hep-ph/0009303 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2001
[61]

Lorc´ e, B

C. Lorc´ e, B. Pasquini: Structure analysis of the gener alized correlator of quark and gluon for a spin-1/2 target. JHEP 09, 138 (2013). [arXiv:1307.4483 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2013
[62]

Mukherjee, S

A. Mukherjee, S. Nair, V. K. Ojha: Wigner distributions for gluons in a light-front dressed quark model. Phys. Rev. D 91, 054018 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.0 54018 [arXiv:1501.03728 [hep-ph]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.0 2015
[63]

Kanazawa, C

K. Kanazawa, C. Lorc´ e, A. Metz, B. Pasquini, M. Schlege l: Twist-2 generalized transverse-momentum de- pendent parton distributions and the spin/orbital structu re of the nucleon. Phys. Rev. D 90, 014028 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.014028 [arXiv:1403.5226 [hep-ph]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.014028 2014
[64]

C. Tan, Z. Lu: Gluon GTMDs at nonzero skewness and impact parameter dependent parton distributions. Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 637 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024- 12976-3 [arXiv:2402.17162 [hep-ph]]

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024- 2024
[65]

Czyzewski, J

J. Czyzewski, J. Kwiecinski, L. Motyka, M. Sadzikowski : Exclusive ηc photoproduction and electroproduction at HERA as a possible probe of the odderon singularity in QCD. Phys. Lett. B 398, 400–406 (1997); Erratum: Phys. Lett. B 411, 402 (1997). [arXiv:hep-ph/9610399 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 1997
[66]

Dumitru, T

A. Dumitru, T. Stebel: Multiquark matrix elements in th e proton and three gluon exchange for exclusive ηc production in photon-proton diﬀractive scattering. Phys. Rev. D 99, 094038 (2019). [arXiv:1902.05070 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2019
[67]

Engel, D

R. Engel, D. Y. Ivanov, R. Kirschner, L. Szymanowski: Di ﬀractive meson production from virtual photons with odd charge-parity exchange. Eur. Phys. J. C 4, 93–99 (1998). [arXiv:hep-ph/9705307 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 1998
[68]

L. A. Harland-Lang, V. A. Khoze, A. D. Martin, M. G. Ryski n: Searching for the Odderon in Ultraperipheral Proton–Ion Collisions at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D 99, 034011 (2019). [arXiv:1811.05478 [hep-ph]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[69]

Boussarie, Y

R. Boussarie, Y. Hatta, L. Szymanowski, S. Wallon: Prob ing the Gluon Sivers Function with an Unpolarized Target: GTMD Distributions and the Odderons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 172501 (2020). [arXiv:1910.03699 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2020
[70]

D. Boer, M. G. Echevarria, P. Mulders, J. Zhou: Single sp in asymmetries from a single Wilson loop. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 122001 (2016). [arXiv:1509.03242 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[71]

Zhou: Transverse single spin asymmetries at small x a nd the anomalous magnetic moment

J. Zhou: Transverse single spin asymmetries at small x a nd the anomalous magnetic moment. Phys. Rev. D 89, 074050 (2014). [arXiv:1311.1386 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2014
[72]

C. J. Bomhof, P. J. Mulders: Non-universality of transv erse momentum dependent parton distribution functions. Nucl. Phys. B 795, 409–427 (2008). [arXiv:0709.2871 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2008
[73]

C. J. Bomhof, P. J. Mulders, F. Pijlman: The Constructio n of gauge-links in arbitrary hard processes. Eur. Phys. J. C 47, 147–162 (2006). [arXiv:hep-ph/0601171 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2006
[74]

M. G. A. Buﬃng, A. Mukherjee, P. J. Mulders: Generalized Universality of Deﬁnite Rank Gluon Transverse Momentum Dependent Correlators. Phys. Rev. D 88, 054027 (2013). [arXiv:1305.5973 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2013
[75]

Pisano, D

C. Pisano, D. Boer, S. J. Brodsky, M. G. A. Buﬃng, P. J. Mul ders: Linear polarization of gluons and photons in unpolarized collider experiments. JHEP 10, 024 (2013). [arXiv:1307.3421 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2013
[76]

D. Boer, W. J. den Dunnen, C. Pisano, M. Schlegel: Determ ining the Higgs spin and parity in the diphoton decay channel . Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 032002 (2013). [arXiv:1304.2614 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2013
[77]

M. G. Echevarria, T. Kasemets, P. J. Mulders, C. Pisano: QCD evolution of (un)polarized gluon TMDPDFs and the Higgs qT -distribution. JHEP 07, 158 (2015); Erratum: JHEP 05, 073 (2017). [arXiv:1502.00672 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2015
[78]

Dominguez, B.-W

F. Dominguez, B. W. Xiao, F. Yuan: kt-factorization for Hard Processes in Nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 022301 (2011). [arXiv:1009.2141 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2011
[79]

Dominguez, C

F. Dominguez, C. Marquet, B. W. Xiao, F. Yuan: Universal ity of Unintegrated Gluon Distributions at small x. Phys. Rev. D 83, 105005 (2011). [arXiv:1101.0795 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2011
[80]

Bacchetta, C

A. Bacchetta, C. Bomhof, U. D’Alesio, P. J. Mulders, F. M urgia: The Sivers single-spin asymmetry in photon-jet production. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 212002 (2007). [arXiv:0707.2074 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2007

Showing first 80 references.