pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10780 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-12 · 💻 cs.CV

LIDARLearn: A Unified Deep Learning Library for 3D Point Cloud Classification, Segmentation, and Self-Supervised Representation Learning

Said Ohamouddou , Hanaa El Afia , Abdellatif El Afia , Raddouane Chiheb This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 14:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords point clouddeep learning libraryself-supervised learningparameter-efficient fine-tuning3D classificationsemantic segmentationPyTorch
0
0 comments X

The pith

LIDARLearn brings 55 point-cloud model configurations into one standardized PyTorch framework.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces LIDARLearn to address the fragmentation of deep learning code for 3D point clouds. Different methods for classification, segmentation, self-supervised pre-training and parameter-efficient fine-tuning currently live in incompatible repositories with mismatched data pipelines and evaluation rules. By collecting them into a single registry-based library with shared runners, stratified cross-validation, automated reporting and built-in statistical tests, the authors aim to make direct, reproducible comparisons possible. A comprehensive test suite validates every configuration end-to-end.

Core claim

LIDARLearn integrates over 55 model configurations covering 29 supervised architectures, seven SSL pre-training methods, and five PEFT strategies, all within a single registry-based framework supporting classification, semantic segmentation, part segmentation, and few-shot learning, together with standardised training runners, K-fold splitting, automated table generation, and Friedman/Nemenyi statistical testing.

What carries the argument

A registry-based framework that registers models, data pipelines and training procedures under a common interface so that any supported architecture can be swapped without altering the rest of the experiment.

If this is right

  • Any new point-cloud architecture added to the registry inherits the same data loaders, augmentations and evaluation protocol automatically.
  • Multi-model comparisons can now include automated critical-difference diagrams and LaTeX table export without manual scripting.
  • Few-shot and part-segmentation tasks become directly comparable across supervised, SSL-pretrained and PEFT-tuned backbones.
  • The 2,200+ unit tests ensure that every configuration remains functional after code changes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Adoption could lower the barrier for researchers who currently spend time re-implementing baselines from scattered repositories.
  • The library's structure makes it straightforward to test whether a new SSL method improves downstream performance when combined with different PEFT strategies.
  • If the registry grows, the same statistical testing machinery could serve as a living benchmark for future 3D point-cloud methods.

Load-bearing premise

That the reimplemented models preserve the original performance and that the shared pipelines do not introduce new biases or artifacts that would invalidate comparisons.

What would settle it

A side-by-side run of several models on ModelNet40 or ShapeNet that shows the unified library reproduces the original papers' reported accuracies within the statistical margins given by the built-in Nemenyi tests.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10780 by Abdellatif El Afia, Hanaa El Afia, Raddouane Chiheb, Said Ohamouddou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Simplified LIDARLearn pipeline. YAML configs drive model construction, dataset loading, and optimizer building via a shared registry. Task-specific runners produce stan￾dardised metric outputs. 3.2 Workflow The following example trains PointMAE with DAPT fine-tuning on a custom LiDAR tree species dataset using 5-fold cross-validation. 1 # 1. Pre-train on ShapeNet55 (300 epochs) 2 python main.py --config cf… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) point cloud analysis has become central to applications ranging from autonomous driving and robotics to forestry and ecological monitoring. Although numerous deep learning methods have been proposed for point cloud understanding, including supervised backbones, self-supervised pre-training (SSL), and parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT), their implementations are scattered across incompatible codebases with differing data pipelines, evaluation protocols, and configuration formats, making fair comparisons difficult. We introduce \lib{}, a unified, extensible PyTorch library that integrates over 55 model configurations covering 29 supervised architectures, seven SSL pre-training methods, and five PEFT strategies, all within a single registry-based framework supporting classification, semantic segmentation, part segmentation, and few-shot learning. \lib{} provides standardised training runners, cross-validation with stratified $K$-fold splitting, automated LaTeX/CSV table generation, built-in Friedman/Nemenyi statistical testing with critical-difference diagrams for rigorous multi-model comparison, and a comprehensive test suite with 2\,200+ automated tests validating every configuration end-to-end. The code is available at https://github.com/said-ohamouddou/LIDARLearn under the MIT licence.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces LIDARLearn, a unified PyTorch library integrating over 55 model configurations (29 supervised architectures, 7 SSL pre-training methods, and 5 PEFT strategies) for 3D point cloud classification, semantic segmentation, part segmentation, and few-shot learning. It provides standardized training runners, stratified K-fold cross-validation, automated LaTeX/CSV table generation, Friedman/Nemenyi statistical testing with critical-difference diagrams, and a test suite exceeding 2,200 automated tests, all under a registry-based framework.

Significance. If the unified implementations are verified to reproduce original results without introducing pipeline artifacts, the library would offer substantial value to the 3D point cloud community by reducing fragmentation across codebases and enabling rigorous, reproducible multi-model comparisons with built-in statistical analysis.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the library enables 'fair comparisons' across models is load-bearing but unsupported, as the manuscript provides no reproduction experiments, benchmark tables, or side-by-side metric comparisons against the source papers to confirm that standardized pipelines preserve original behaviors (e.g., data augmentation, normalization, or evaluation protocols).
  2. [Library Design] The description of the registry-based framework and runners (implied in the library design) does not address potential hidden biases from integrating disparate original codebases; without explicit checks or ablations, differences in implementation details could undermine the promise of consistent results across the 55 configurations.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'LIDARLearn' via the placeholder macro 'lib' without an initial definition or expansion on first use.
  2. No specific section or table numbers are provided for the claimed 2,200+ tests or the statistical testing implementation, making it difficult to locate and verify these components.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below with clarifications on the library's standardization approach and indicate planned revisions to strengthen the presentation of fair comparison capabilities.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The central claim that the library enables 'fair comparisons' across models is load-bearing but unsupported, as the manuscript provides no reproduction experiments, benchmark tables, or side-by-side metric comparisons against the source papers to confirm that standardized pipelines preserve original behaviors (e.g., data augmentation, normalization, or evaluation protocols).

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not include explicit reproduction experiments or side-by-side benchmark tables comparing our unified implementations against the original source papers. The library's core contribution is the registry-based framework with standardized runners, stratified cross-validation, and evaluation protocols that enforce consistency across all 55 configurations. The 2,200+ automated tests validate end-to-end execution for every model. To better support the claim, we will add a dedicated subsection (or appendix) presenting reproduction results for a representative subset of models from each category, confirming that performance metrics align with reported originals within expected variance due to random seeds and hardware. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Library Design] The description of the registry-based framework and runners (implied in the library design) does not address potential hidden biases from integrating disparate original codebases; without explicit checks or ablations, differences in implementation details could undermine the promise of consistent results across the 55 configurations.

    Authors: We agree that integrating code from multiple original repositories requires explicit safeguards against hidden biases. The registry abstracts model registration while preserving original architectures, and all models share unified data pipelines, augmentation strategies, normalization, and metric computation enforced by the runners. The comprehensive test suite includes configuration-specific checks for output consistency and basic numerical stability. We will revise the library design section to explicitly describe these standardization measures and note any targeted checks performed during integration. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; software library paper with no derivation chain

full rationale

The manuscript introduces LIDARLearn as a unified PyTorch library integrating existing models, runners, and testing infrastructure for point cloud tasks. It contains no equations, predictions, fitted parameters, or theoretical derivations that could reduce to inputs by construction. The contribution is the registry-based framework and standardization tooling itself, with no load-bearing self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness claims invoked. All described components (55+ configurations, 2200+ tests, statistical testing) are presented as engineering deliverables rather than derived results, rendering the paper self-contained against external benchmarks with no circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a software library contribution rather than a theoretical derivation, so no free parameters, axioms, or invented scientific entities are required or introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5537 in / 1227 out tokens · 67435 ms · 2026-05-10T14:59:20.423555+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Points to patches: Enabling the use of self-attention for 3d shape recognition

    Axel Berg, Magnus Oskarsson, and Mark O'Connor. Points to patches: Enabling the use of self-attention for 3d shape recognition. In International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Decoupled local aggregation for point cloud learning

    Binjie Chen, Yunzhou Xia, Yu Zang, Cheng Wang, and Jonathan Li. Decoupled local aggregation for point cloud learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16532, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Pointgpt: Auto-regressively generative pre-training from point clouds

    Guangyan Chen, Meiling Wang, Yi Yang, Kai Yu, Li Yuan, and Yufeng Yue. Pointgpt: Auto-regressively generative pre-training from point clouds. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 36, pages 29615--29627, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Pointscnet: Point cloud structure and correlation learning based on space-filling curve-guided sampling

    Xingye Chen, Yiqi Wu, Wenjie Xu, Jin Li, Huaiyi Dong, and Yilin Chen. Pointscnet: Point cloud structure and correlation learning based on space-filling curve-guided sampling. Symmetry, 14 0 (1): 0 8, 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Ppfnet: Global context aware local features for robust 3d point matching

    Haowen Deng, Tolga Birdal, and Slobodan Ilic. Ppfnet: Global context aware local features for robust 3d point matching. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Autoencoders as cross-modal teachers: Can pretrained 2d image transformers help 3d representation learning? In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

    Runpei Dong, Zekun Qi, Linfeng Zhang, Junbo Zhang, Jianjian Sun, Zheng Ge, Li Yi, and Kaisheng Ma. Autoencoders as cross-modal teachers: Can pretrained 2d image transformers help 3d representation learning? In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Pct: Point cloud transformer

    Meng-Hao Guo, Jun-Xiong Cai, Zheng-Ning Liu, Tai-Jiang Mu, Ralph R Martin, and Shi-Min Hu. Pct: Point cloud transformer. Computational Visual Media, 7: 0 187--199, 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Visual prompt tuning

    Menglin Jia, Luming Tang, Bor-Chun Chen, Claire Cardie, Serge Belongie, Bharath Hariharan, and Ser-Nam Lim. Visual prompt tuning. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 709--727, 2022

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Deepgcns: Can gcns go as deep as cnns? In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2019

    Guohao Li, Matthias M \"u ller, Ali Thabet, and Bernard Ghanem. Deepgcns: Can gcns go as deep as cnns? In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2019

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Chen, and Gim Hee Lee

    Jiaxin Li, Ben M. Chen, and Gim Hee Lee. So-net: Self-organizing net for point cloud analysis. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2018 a

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Pointcnn: Convolution on x-transformed points

    Yangyan Li, Rui Bu, Mingchao Sun, Wei Wu, Xinhan Di, and Baoquan Chen. Pointcnn: Convolution on x-transformed points. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2018 b

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Parameter-efficient fine-tuning in spectral domain for point cloud learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08114, 2024

    Dingkang Liang, Tianrui Feng, Xin Zhou, Yumeng Zhang, Zhikang Zou, and Xiang Bai. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning in spectral domain for point cloud learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08114, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Relation-shape convolutional neural network for point cloud analysis

    Yongcheng Liu, Bin Fan, Shiming Xiang, and Chunhong Pan. Relation-shape convolutional neural network for point cloud analysis. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2019

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Rethinking network design and local geometry in point cloud: A simple residual mlp framework

    Xu Ma, Can Qin, Haoxuan You, Haoxi Ran, and Yun Fu. Rethinking network design and local geometry in point cloud: A simple residual mlp framework. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2022

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Ms-dgcnn++: Multi-scale dynamic graph convolution with scale-dependent normalization for robust lidar tree species classification, 2026 a

    Said Ohamouddou, Hanaa El Afia, Mohamed Hamza Boulaich, Abdellatif El Afia, and Raddouane Chiheb. Ms-dgcnn++: Multi-scale dynamic graph convolution with scale-dependent normalization for robust lidar tree species classification, 2026 a . URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12602

    work page arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    Introducing the short-time fourier kolmogorov arnold network: A dynamic graph cnn approach for tree species classification in 3d point clouds

    Said Ohamouddou, Mohamed Ohamouddou, Hanaa El Afia, Abdellatif El Afia, Rafik Lasri, and Raddouane Chiheb. Introducing the short-time fourier kolmogorov arnold network: A dynamic graph cnn approach for tree species classification in 3d point clouds. Pattern Recognition, 165: 0 112584, 2026 b

    work page 2026

  17. [17]

    Masked autoencoders for point cloud self-supervised learning

    Yatian Pang, Wenxiao Wang, Francis EH Tay, Wei Liu, Yonghong Tian, and Li Yuan. Masked autoencoders for point cloud self-supervised learning. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 604--621, 2022

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation

    Charles R Qi, Hao Su, Kaichun Mo, and Leonidas J Guibas. Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 652--660, 2017 a

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space

    Charles Ruizhongtai Qi, Li Yi, Hao Su, and Leonidas J Guibas. Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30, 2017 b

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Contrast with reconstruct: Contrastive 3d representation learning guided by generative pretraining

    Zekun Qi, Runpei Dong, Guofan Fan, Zheng Ge, Xiangyu Zhang, Kaisheng Ma, and Li Yi. Contrast with reconstruct: Contrastive 3d representation learning guided by generative pretraining. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 28223--28243, 2023

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Surface representation for point clouds

    Haoxi Ran, Jun Liu, and Chengjie Wang. Surface representation for point clouds. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Predicting tree species from 3d laser scanning point clouds using deep learning

    Dominik Seidel, Peter Annigh \"o fer, Martin Ehbrecht, Delphine C Zemp, Setotaw Alem, and Tobias Hedrich. Predicting tree species from 3d laser scanning point clouds using deep learning. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12: 0 635440, 2021

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Pointnet with kan versus pointnet with mlp for 3d classification and segmentation of point sets

    Ali Stanford. Pointnet with kan versus pointnet with mlp for 3d classification and segmentation of point sets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.09462, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Parameter-efficient prompt learning for 3d point cloud understanding

    Hongyu Sun, Yongcai Wang, Wang Chen, Haoran Deng, and Deying Li. Parameter-efficient prompt learning for 3d point cloud understanding. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 9478--9486, 2024

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Dynamic graph cnn for learning on point clouds

    Yue Wang, Yongbin Sun, Ziwei Liu, Sanjay E Sarma, Michael M Bronstein, and Justin M Solomon. Dynamic graph cnn for learning on point clouds. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 38 0 (5): 0 1--12, 2019

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    P2p: Tuning pre-trained image models for point cloud analysis with point-to-pixel prompting

    Ziyi Wang, Xumin Yu, Yongming Rao, Jie Zhou, and Jiwen Lu. P2p: Tuning pre-trained image models for point cloud analysis with point-to-pixel prompting. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2022

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Pointconv: Deep convolutional networks on 3d point clouds

    Wenxuan Wu, Zhongang Qi, and Li Fuxin. Pointconv: Deep convolutional networks on 3d point clouds. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2019

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    Point transformer v2: Grouped vector attention and partition-based pooling

    Xiaoyang Wu, Yixing Lao, Li Jiang, Xihui Liu, and Hengshuang Zhao. Point transformer v2: Grouped vector attention and partition-based pooling. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 35, pages 33330--33342, 2022

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Point transformer v3: Simpler faster stronger

    Xiaoyang Wu, Li Jiang, Peng-Shuai Wang, Zhijian Liu, Xihui Liu, Yu Qiao, Wanli Ouyang, Tong He, and Hengshuang Zhao. Point transformer v3: Simpler faster stronger. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4840--4851, 2024

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Walk in the cloud: Learning curves for point clouds shape analysis

    Tiange Xiang, Chaoyi Zhang, Yang Song, Jianhui Yu, and Weidong Cai. Walk in the cloud: Learning curves for point clouds shape analysis. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2021

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Learning geometry-disentangled representation for complementary understanding of 3d object point cloud

    Mutian Xu, Junhao Zhang, Zhipeng Zhou, Mingye Xu, Xiaojuan Qi, and Yu Qiao. Learning geometry-disentangled representation for complementary understanding of 3d object point cloud. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2021

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Point-bert: Pre-training 3d point cloud transformers with masked point modeling

    Xumin Yu, Lulu Tang, Yongming Rao, Tiejun Huang, Jie Zhou, and Jiwen Lu. Point-bert: Pre-training 3d point cloud transformers with masked point modeling. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 19313--19322, 2022

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Instance-aware dynamic prompt tuning for pre-trained point cloud models

    Yaohua Zha, Jinpeng Wang, Tao Dai, Bin Chen, Zhi Wang, and Shu-Tao Xia. Instance-aware dynamic prompt tuning for pre-trained point cloud models. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 14161--14170, 2023

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Multi-scale dynamic graph convolution network for point clouds classification

    Zhengli Zhai, Xin Zhang, and Luyao Yao. Multi-scale dynamic graph convolution network for point clouds classification. IEEE Access, 9: 0 62041--62050, 2021

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Pvt: Point-voxel transformer for point cloud learning

    Cheng Zhang, Haocheng Wan, Xinyi Shen, and Zizhao Wu. Pvt: Point-voxel transformer for point cloud learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.06076, 2021

    work page arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Point-m2ae: multi-scale masked autoencoders for hierarchical point cloud pre-training

    Renrui Zhang, Ziyu Guo, Peng Gao, Rongyao Fang, Bin Zhao, Dong Wang, Yu Qiao, and Hongsheng Li. Point-m2ae: multi-scale masked autoencoders for hierarchical point cloud pre-training. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 35, pages 27061--27074, 2022

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Pcp-mae: Learning to predict centers for point masked autoencoders

    Xiangdong Zhang, Shaofeng Zhang, and Junchi Yan. Pcp-mae: Learning to predict centers for point masked autoencoders. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2024

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    PointWeb : Enhancing Local Neighborhood Features for Point Cloud Processing

    Hengshuang Zhao, Li Jiang, Chi-Wing Fu, and Jiaya Jia. PointWeb : Enhancing Local Neighborhood Features for Point Cloud Processing . In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 5560--5568, 2019

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    Point transformer

    Hengshuang Zhao, Li Jiang, Jiaya Jia, Philip HS Torr, and Vladlen Koltun. Point transformer. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 16259--16268, 2021

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Dynamic adapter meets prompt tuning: Parameter-efficient transfer learning for point cloud analysis

    Xin Zhou, Dingkang Liang, Wei Xu, Xingkui Zhu, Yihan Xu, Zhikang Zou, and Xiang Bai. Dynamic adapter meets prompt tuning: Parameter-efficient transfer learning for point cloud analysis. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 14707--14717, 2024

    work page 2024