arxiv: 2604.11180 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-13 · ⚛️ nucl-th

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Extended Variable Phase Method for Spin-1/2 Correlation Functions

Renjie Zou , Sheng Xiao , Zhi Qin , Zhigang Xiao

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 06:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th

keywords correlation functionsvariable phase methodnoncentral potentialsspin-1/2 particlesReid soft-core potentialnucleon-nucleon interactionspartial wavesGaussian sources

0 comments

The pith

Extending the variable phase method calculates correlation functions for spin-1/2 particles that include noncentral interaction terms.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a systematic way to compute correlation functions for spin-1/2 particles by extending the variable phase method to include noncentral potentials. This extension allows numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation to obtain partial-wave contributions. Using the Reid soft-core potential as an example, the approach evaluates nucleon-nucleon correlation functions for Gaussian sources of different sizes and compares them. Such calculations matter because they help model how particles interact in nuclear systems where both central and tensor forces play roles.

Core claim

The authors present an extended variable phase method that accommodates noncentral components of the interparticle interaction for spin-1/2 particles. By numerically solving the Schrödinger equation within this framework, they evaluate the partial-wave contributions to the nucleon-nucleon correlation functions with the Reid soft-core potential. The resulting correlation functions are compared across Gaussian sources of varying sizes.

What carries the argument

The extended variable phase method for noncentral potentials, which enables computation of partial-wave contributions to the correlation function by solving the Schrödinger equation.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical implementation remains stable and accurate for noncentral potentials without introducing significant truncation or discretization errors for the Reid soft-core case.

What would settle it

A direct comparison showing large discrepancies between the computed partial-wave correlation functions and those from an independent method like solving the Lippmann-Schwinger equation for the same potential and source would falsify the accuracy of the extension.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11180 by Renjie Zou, Sheng Xiao, Zhigang Xiao, Zhi Qin.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Variations of the correlation functions upon sequentially adding Reid potentials of specific channels. (a,b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: The neutron-proton correlation function for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: It is evident from Fig. 2 that all partial waves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Correlation functions for Gaussian sources with different standard deviation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We have developed a systematic approach to calculate the correlation function for spin-1/2 particles, incorporating both central and noncentral components of the interparticle interaction. This is achieved by extending the variable phase method to accommodate noncentral potentials and numerically solving the Schr\"odinger equation. Within this framework, the partial-wave contributions to the nucleon-nucleon correlation functions adopting the Reid soft-core potential are evaluated. The resulting correlation functions are then compared for Gaussian sources of different sizes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper extends the variable phase method to noncentral potentials for spin-1/2 nucleon correlation functions but supplies almost no numerical checks on the coupled-channel results.

read the letter

The core advance here is taking the variable phase approach, which turns the Schrödinger equation into first-order equations for the phase, and generalizing it to handle tensor and spin-orbit terms that couple partial waves. They then use this to compute correlation functions for the Reid soft-core potential and show how the results change with different Gaussian source sizes. That is a concrete technical step for people who need correlation functions that include realistic NN forces rather than just central ones. The method description is straightforward and the choice of Reid soft-core is standard, so the setup itself is clear. The comparison across source widths is also a useful sanity check on the output. The main weakness is that the work gives no evidence the numerics are under control. There are no tables showing convergence with the number of partial waves, no tests of radial step size or asymptotic matching, and no side-by-side numbers against existing momentum-space or other variable-phase calculations of the same quantities. For a coupled-channel problem with strong S-D mixing, those checks matter; without them the final C(r) curves are hard to trust at the level needed for data analysis. The paper is aimed at nuclear theorists who already work with femtoscopy or two-particle correlations and want a phase-shift-based route that can include noncentral forces. It is not broad enough or validated enough to interest a wider audience. I would send it to peer review so that referees can look at the actual code or integration details and decide whether the extension is reliable in practice.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper develops an extension of the variable phase method to noncentral (tensor and spin-orbit) potentials for spin-1/2 particles. It numerically solves the resulting coupled-channel equations for the Reid soft-core nucleon-nucleon interaction, extracts partial-wave contributions to the correlation function, and compares results for Gaussian sources of different widths.

Significance. If the numerical implementation proves accurate, the work supplies a systematic route to include realistic noncentral forces in two-particle correlation functions, which are used to extract source sizes and interaction parameters in nuclear collisions. The extension itself is a natural and potentially reusable technical step beyond central-potential treatments.

major comments (2)

[Numerical Results] Numerical Results section: no convergence tables, step-size studies, or partial-wave cutoff tests are shown for the coupled S-D channels of the Reid soft-core potential. Because the correlation function is obtained by folding the source with the wave function that depends on these phase matrices, the absence of error estimates directly undermines the claim that the method yields reliable results for different Gaussian widths.
[Method] Method section, extension to noncentral potentials: the manuscript gives no explicit comparison of the computed phase shifts (or asymptotic wave functions) against established Reid soft-core values or against momentum-space calculations. Without such benchmarks the accuracy of the source-folded C(r) cannot be assessed.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract states that the Schrödinger equation is solved numerically, yet the core technique is the variable-phase method; a brief clarifying sentence would avoid confusion for readers unfamiliar with the formalism.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and the detailed comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will make the necessary revisions to improve the clarity and validation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Numerical Results] Numerical Results section: no convergence tables, step-size studies, or partial-wave cutoff tests are shown for the coupled S-D channels of the Reid soft-core potential. Because the correlation function is obtained by folding the source with the wave function that depends on these phase matrices, the absence of error estimates directly undermines the claim that the method yields reliable results for different Gaussian widths.

Authors: We acknowledge that explicit convergence studies would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript, we will include a new subsection or appendix with tables demonstrating the convergence of the phase matrices and the resulting correlation functions with respect to the radial step size and the partial-wave cutoff for the coupled channels. This will provide error estimates for the Gaussian sources of varying widths. revision: yes
Referee: [Method] Method section, extension to noncentral potentials: the manuscript gives no explicit comparison of the computed phase shifts (or asymptotic wave functions) against established Reid soft-core values or against momentum-space calculations. Without such benchmarks the accuracy of the source-folded C(r) cannot be assessed.

Authors: The extension of the variable phase method to noncentral potentials follows standard procedures for solving the coupled radial equations, and we have verified internally that our phase shifts match known values. To make this transparent, we will add in the revised Method section a direct comparison of our computed phase shifts for the Reid soft-core potential in the ^1S0, ^3S1-^3D1, and other relevant channels against established literature values from momentum-space calculations. This benchmark will confirm the accuracy prior to computing the correlation functions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: numerical extension of variable-phase method applied to external Reid potential

full rationale

The paper extends the variable phase method to noncentral potentials and solves the Schrödinger equation numerically for partial-wave contributions to nucleon-nucleon correlation functions using the Reid soft-core potential. This is a direct numerical implementation without any fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations. The central claim reduces to solving coupled ODEs for phase matrices on a known external potential, which is independent of the paper's own outputs. No equations or steps in the provided abstract or description exhibit reduction by construction to inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on the standard Reid soft-core potential as input and the validity of numerically solving the Schrödinger equation with the extended method; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The Reid soft-core potential provides a sufficiently accurate description of nucleon-nucleon interactions for the purpose of correlation-function calculations.
Adopted directly as the interaction model without further justification in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5369 in / 1176 out tokens · 51579 ms · 2026-05-13T06:58:53.558692+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

extending the variable phase method to accommodate noncentral potentials and numerically solving the Schrödinger equation... Reid soft-core potential

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

[1]

The differences among correlation functions in spe- cific channels highlight the importance of their weighting factors

work page
[2]

To make the contributions of higher order partial waves to the correlation function exceed 0.1, the source size should be around or below 1 fm

work page
[3]

The near threshold resonance scattering in the 3S1 − 3D1 channel has a significant effect on the recoil depth of the neutron-proton correlation func- tion and relatively reduces its dependence on the source size. Our framework can be readily extended to other two- particle correlations (e.g.,ΛΛ, pΛ) with various poten- tials, as well as to other applicati...

work page
[4]

R. H. Brown and R. G. Twiss, Philosophical Magazine 45, 663 (1954)

work page 1954
[5]

Hanbury Brown, R

R. Hanbury Brown, R. C. Jennison, and M. K. D. Gupta, Nature (London)170, 1061 (1952)

work page 1952
[6]

Goldhaber, W

G. Goldhaber, W. B. Fowler, S. Goldhaber, T. F. Hoang, T. E. Kalogeropoulos, and W. M. Powell, Phys. Rev. Lett.3, 181 (1959)

work page 1959
[7]

Ghetti, J

R. Ghetti, J. Helgesson, V. Avdeichikov, P. Golubev, B. Jakobsson, N. Colonna, G. Tagliente, S. Kopecky, V. L. Kravchuk, H. W. Wilschut, E. W. Anderson, P. Nadel-Turonski, L. Westerberg, V. Bellini, M. L. Sper- duto, and C. Sutera, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 092701 (2003)

work page 2003
[8]

Y. Wang, F. Guan, Q. Wu, X. Diao, Y. Huang, L. Lyu, Y. Qin, Z. Qin, D. Si, Z. Bai, F. Duan, L. Duan, Z. Gao, Q. Hu, R. Hu, G. Jin, S. Jin, J. Ma, P. Ma, J. Wang, P. Wang, Y. Wang, X. Wei, H. Yang, Y. Yang, G. Yu, Y. Yu, Y. Zhang, Q. Zhou, Y. Zhang, C. Ma, X. Hu, H. Wang, Y. Cui, J. Tian, and Z. Xiao, Physics Letters B825, 136856 (2022)

work page 2022
[9]

X. Duan, J. Liu, X. Liu, W. Lin, H. Zheng, A. Bonasera, Z. Chen, J. Han, M. Huang, K. Hagel, C. W. Ma, G. Qu, P. Ren, G. Tian, J. Wang, R. Wada, and J. B. Natowitz, Phys. Rev. C113, 014603 (2026)

work page 2026
[10]

J. Xu, Z. Qin, R. Zou, D. Si, S. Xiao, B. Tian, Y. Wang, and Z. Xiao, Chin. Phys. Lett.42, 031401 (2025), arXiv:2411.08718 [nucl-th]. 10

work page arXiv 2025
[11]

Zhang, J

H. Zhang, J. Xu, P. Li, Z. Qin, D. Si, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, Q. Li, and Z. Xiao, Phys. Rev. C113, 034904 (2026), arXiv:2510.20554 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2026
[12]

Danielewicz and M

P. Danielewicz and M. Kurata-Nishimura, Phys. Rev. C 105, 034608 (2022)

work page 2022
[13]

Nzabahimana and P

P. Nzabahimana and P. Danielewicz, Physics Letters B 846, 138247 (2023)

work page 2023
[14]

Liu and J.-J

S.-W. Liu and J.-J. Xie, Chin. Phys. Lett.43, 050202 (2026)

work page 2026
[15]

Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys

S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys. Lett. B822, 136708 (2021), arXiv:2105.05683 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2021
[16]

Hirano and K

T. Hirano and K. Tsuda, Phys. Rev. C66, 054905 (2002), arXiv:nucl-th/0205043

work page arXiv 2002
[17]

Heiselberg and A.-M

H. Heiselberg and A.-M. Levy, Phys. Rev. C59, 2716 (1999), arXiv:nucl-th/9812034

work page arXiv 1999
[18]

A. Ster, M. Csanad, T. Csorgo, B. Lorstad, and B. Tomasik, Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett.8, 995 (2011), arXiv:1104.1188 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2011
[19]

Kettler,Systematic Azimuth Quadrupole and Mini- jet Trends from Two-Particle Correlations in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Ph.D

D. Kettler,Systematic Azimuth Quadrupole and Mini- jet Trends from Two-Particle Correlations in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Ph.D. thesis, Washington U., Seattle (2014)

work page 2014
[20]

X. G. Cao, X. Z. Cai, Y. G. Ma, D. Q. Fang, G. Q. Zhang, W. Guo, J. G. Chen, and J. S. Wang, Phys. Rev. C86, 044620 (2012)

work page 2012
[21]

W. H. Richardson, J. Opt. Soc. Am.62, 55 (1972)

work page 1972
[22]

D. Si, S. Xiao, Z. Qin, Y. Qin, J. Xu, B. Tian, B. Zhang, H. Zhang, R. Zou, D. Guo, Y. Wang, X. Wei, Y. Hao, Z. Wang, T. Zhuo, C. Ma, Y. Yang, X. Wei, H. Yang, P. Ma, L. Duan, F. Duan, K. Wang, J. Ma, S. Xu, Z. Bai, G. Yang, Y. Yang, and Z. Xiao, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 222301 (2025)

work page 2025
[23]

Kaon femtoscopy in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}}}$ = 2.76 TeV

S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys. Rev. C96, 064613 (2017), arXiv:1709.01731 [nucl-ex]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[24]

V. M. Shapoval, P. Braun-Munzinger, I. A. Karpenko, and Y. M. Sinyukov, Nucl. Phys. A929, 1 (2014), arXiv:1404.4501 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2014
[25]

Hatsuda, K

T. Hatsuda, K. Morita, A. Ohnishi, and K. Sasaki, Nucl. Phys. A967, 856 (2017), arXiv:1704.05225 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[26]

Wang and S

F.-Q. Wang and S. Pratt, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 3138 (1999), arXiv:nucl-th/9907019

work page arXiv 1999
[27]

The $\bf{\Lambda p}$ interaction studied via femtoscopy in p + Nb reactions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{s_{NN}}=3.18} ~\mathrm{\bf{GeV}}$

J. Adamczewski-Muschet al.(HADES), Phys. Rev. C 94, 025201 (2016), arXiv:1602.08880 [nucl-ex]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[28]

Morita, T

K. Morita, T. Furumoto, and A. Ohnishi, Phys. Rev. C 91, 024916 (2015), arXiv:1408.6682 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2015
[29]

Liu, D.-L

Z.-W. Liu, D.-L. Ge, J.-X. Lu, M.-Z. Liu, and L.-S. Geng, Phys. Rev. D112, 054019 (2025)

work page 2025
[30]

Liu, J.-X

Z.-W. Liu, J.-X. Lu, and L.-S. Geng, Phys. Rev. D107, 074019 (2023)

work page 2023
[31]

Kohno and H

M. Kohno and H. Kamada, Phys. Rev. C112, 044005 (2025), arXiv:2507.03792 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

Ramos, J

À. Ramos, J. M. Torres-Rincon, A. de Fagoaga, and E. Cabré, Phys. Rev. D113, 036020 (2026), arXiv:2507.22593 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[33]

Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys

S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys. Lett. B871, 139921 (2025), arXiv:2505.01061 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[34]

Bergmann,Jet-hadron correlations with respect to the event plane in PbPb and pp collisions at sqrts_NN=5.02 TeV with ALICE, Ph.D

L. Bergmann,Jet-hadron correlations with respect to the event plane in PbPb and pp collisions at sqrts_NN=5.02 TeV with ALICE, Ph.D. thesis, U. Heidelberg (main) (2025)

work page 2025
[35]

Faxén and J

H. Faxén and J. Holtsmark, Zeitschrift fur Physik45, 307 (1927)

work page 1927
[36]

Lednicky and V

R. Lednicky and V. L. Lyuboshitz,Influence of final- state interaction on correlations of two particles with nearly equal momenta, Tech. Rep. (Joint Inst. Nucl. Res., Dubna, 1981)

work page 1981
[37]

Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys

S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys. Lett. B845, 138145 (2023), arXiv:2305.19093 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[38]

Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys

S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 092301 (2020), arXiv:1905.13470 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2020
[39]

S. A. Rakityansky, Non-central potential, inJost Func- tions in Quantum Mechanics: A Unified Approach to Scattering, Bound, and Resonant State Problems (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022) pp. 255–290

work page 2022
[41]

L. C. Biedenharn and J. M. Blatt, Phys. Rev.93, 1387 (1954)

work page 1954
[42]

R. V. Reid, Annals of Physics50, 411 (1968)

work page 1968
[43]

Göbel and A

M. Göbel and A. Kievsky, Phys. Lett. B869, 139835 (2025), arXiv:2505.13433 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[44]

BEREZIN and N

I. BEREZIN and N. ZHIDKOV, inComputing Methods, edited by I. BEREZIN and N. ZHIDKOV (Pergamon,

work page
[45]

G. T. Thompson, SIAM Review1, 177 (1959), https://doi.org/10.1137/1001035

work page doi:10.1137/1001035 1959
[46]

Lednický and V

R. Lednický and V. L. Lyuboshitz, Acta Physica Hun- garica Heavy Ion Physics3, 93 (1996)

work page 1996
[47]

Anchishkin, U

D. Anchishkin, U. Heinz, and P. Renk, Phys. Rev. C57, 1428 (1998)

work page 1998
[48]

S. E. Koonin, Physics Letters B70, 43 (1977)

work page 1977
[49]

Pratt and M

S. Pratt and M. Tsang, Physical Review C36, 2390 – 2395 (1987), cited by: 115

work page 1987
[50]

P. M. Morse and W. P. Allis, Phys. Rev.44, 269 (1933)

work page 1933
[51]

Calogero, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)27, 261 (1963)

F. Calogero, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)27, 261 (1963)

work page 1955
[52]

V. V. Babikov, Soviet Physics Uspekhi10, 271 (1967)

work page 1967
[53]

Calogero and J

F. Calogero and J. L. Gammel, American Journal of Physics36, 566 (1968)

work page 1968
[54]

Abramowitz, I

M. Abramowitz, I. A. Stegun, and D. Miller, Journal of Applied Mechanics32, 239 (1965)

work page 1965
[55]

DLMF,NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, https://dlmf.nist.gov/, Release 1.2.4 of 2025-03-15, f. W. J. Olver, A. B. Olde Daalhuis, D. W. Lozier, B. I. Schneider, R. F. Boisvert, C. W. Clark, B. R. Miller, B. V. Saunders, H. S. Cohl, and M. A. McClain, eds

work page 2025
[56]

LANDAU and E

L. LANDAU and E. LIFSHITZ, inQuantum Mechan- ics (Third Edition), edited by L. LANDAU and E. LIF- SHITZ (Pergamon, 1977) third edition ed., pp. 502–590

work page 1977
[57]

L. I. Schiff and J. H. Gardner, American Journal of Physics41, 599 (1973)

work page 1973
[58]

Sommerfeld, Annalen Phys.403, 257 (1931)

A. Sommerfeld, Annalen Phys.403, 257 (1931)

work page 1931
[59]

Clebsch, Theorie der binären algebraischen For- men., Leipzig

A. Clebsch, Theorie der binären algebraischen For- men., Leipzig. Teubner. Recens. von Th. Kötteritzsch, Schlömilch Litz. XVII. 110-112 (1872). (1872)

work page
[60]

Rarita and J

W. Rarita and J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev.59, 436 (1941)

work page 1941
[61]

Eckart, Rev

C. Eckart, Rev. Mod. Phys.2, 305 (1930)

work page 1930
[62]

J. M. Blatt and L. C. Biedenharn, Phys. Rev.86, 399 (1952)

work page 1952
[63]

Rohrlich and J

F. Rohrlich and J. Eisenstein, Phys. Rev.75, 705 (1949)

work page 1949
[64]

H. P. Stapp, T. J. Ypsilantis, and N. Metropolis, Phys. Rev.105, 302 (1957)

work page 1957
[65]

Becattini and F

F. Becattini and F. Piccinini, Annals of Physics323, 2452 (2008)

work page 2008
[66]

Becattini, F

F. Becattini, F. Piccinini, and J. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. C77, 024906 (2008)

work page 2008
[67]

T. S. Collaboration, Nature548, 62 (2017)

work page 2017
[68]

J. M. Blatt and J. D. Jackson, Phys. Rev.76, 18 (1949). 11

work page 1949
[69]

Alexander, Reports on Progress in Physics66, 481 (2003)

G. Alexander, Reports on Progress in Physics66, 481 (2003)

work page 2003
[70]

D. A. Brown and P. Danielewicz, Phys. Rev. C57, 2474 (1998), arXiv:nucl-th/9712066

work page arXiv 1998
[71]

Rebreyendet al., Phys

D. Rebreyendet al., Phys. Rev. C46, 2387 (1992)

work page 1992
[72]

Ayala, S

A. Ayala, S. Bernal-Langarica, I. Dominguez, I. Maldon- ado, and M. E. Tejeda-Yeomans, Eur. Phys. J. A60, 135 (2024), arXiv:2401.00619 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024