Density Functional Theory Study of Lanthanide Monoxides under High Pressure: Pressure-Induced B1-B2 Transition

Daniel Errandonea; Sergio Ferrari

arxiv: 2604.11194 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Density Functional Theory Study of Lanthanide Monoxides under High Pressure: Pressure-Induced B1-B2 Transition

Sergio Ferrari , Daniel Errandonea This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords lanthanide monoxideshigh pressurephase transitiondensity functional theoryB1 B2 structurescrystal structurebulk modulusequation of state

0 comments

The pith

Density functional theory calculations predict that all fifteen lanthanide monoxides undergo a B1 to B2 structural phase transition under high pressure.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies density functional theory to the full series of lanthanide monoxides from LaO to LuO to determine how hydrostatic pressure changes their crystal structures. It first compares two approximations and finds that the general gradient approximation reproduces known ambient-pressure properties of the B1 structure more reliably than the local density approximation. With the better-performing method the calculations show that the B1 arrangement is the lowest-enthalpy phase at ordinary pressures, yet every compound switches to the B2 arrangement once pressure is raised sufficiently. The work also reports the accompanying pressure-volume curves and bulk moduli for the entire series.

Core claim

Using density functional theory with the general gradient approximation, the B1 (NaCl-type) structure is the most thermodynamically stable phase at ambient pressure for all fifteen lanthanide monoxides. At elevated pressures every compound undergoes a first-order structural transition to the B2 (CsCl-type) phase. The pressure-volume relation and the isothermal bulk modulus are obtained from the same calculations.

What carries the argument

Enthalpy-versus-pressure curves computed for the B1, B2, and B3 cubic structures; the pressure at which the B2 curve crosses below the B1 curve marks the transition point for each compound.

If this is right

B1 remains the stable structure at zero pressure for the entire lanthanide monoxide series.
All fifteen compounds share the same B1-to-B2 transition sequence under compression.
The calculated pressure-volume data furnish an isothermal equation of state and bulk modulus for each material.
GGA reproduces experimental lattice parameters and volumes of the B1 phase more closely than LDA.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The predicted transition pressures could serve as targets for future diamond-anvil-cell experiments on these compounds.
Because the study treats the full lanthanide series uniformly, trends in transition pressure or bulk modulus across the row become directly comparable.
The same computational protocol could be extended to related rare-earth compounds to test whether the B1-B2 sequence is a general feature under high pressure.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the general gradient approximation supplies accurate enough total energies and pressures to locate the B1-B2 crossing correctly.

What would settle it

Direct experimental measurement of the pressure at which each lanthanide monoxide transforms from B1 to B2; systematic mismatch between measured and calculated transition pressures would falsify the predictions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11194 by Daniel Errandonea, Sergio Ferrari.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Crystal structure of the (a) B1, (b) B2, and (B3) phases. The blue (yellow) spheres represent the lanthanide (oxygen) atoms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Enthalpy versus pressure for (a) LaO, (b) CeO, (c) PrO, and (d) NdO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Enthalpy versus pressure for (a) PmO, (b) SmO, (c) EuO, and (d) GdO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Enthalpy versus pressure for (a) TbO, (b) DyO, (c) HoO, and (d) ErO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Enthalpy versus pressure for (a) TmO, (b) YbO, and (c) LuO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Using density functional theory, we study the influence of hydrostatic pressure on the crystal structure of lanthanide monoxides, focusing on the monoxides formed by the fifteen elements of the lanthanide series, from La to Lu. Calculations are performed using two methods for the ambient pressure B1 (NaCl type) structure, the general gradient approximation (GGA) and the local density approximation (LDA). Through a systematic comparison with existent experimental data, we find that the first method agrees better with the experiments. In addition, considering other cubic structures previously reported for lanthanide monoxides, as B2 (CsCl type) and B3 (ZnS type), we explore the possibility of the occurrence of pressure-induced phase transitions. Based on the better accuracy of GGA to describe the B1 phase at ambient conditions, we exclusively use GGA for the high pressure study. We find, for the fifteen studied compounds, that, at ambient pressure, the B1 structure is the one with the lowest enthalpy, being therefore the most thermodynamically stable structure. We also determine that, at elevated pressures, all the studied compounds undergo a structural phase transition to the B2 phase. We finally establish the relationship between pressure and volume of the unit cell, along with the associated isothermal equation of state, determining the bulk modulus.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

GGA-DFT sweep across all LnO predicts universal B1-B2 transitions under pressure, but the f-electron handling at compression is the untested assumption.

read the letter

The main point is that this paper runs the same GGA setup on every lanthanide monoxide from La to Lu and finds that the B1 structure gives way to B2 at high pressure in all fifteen cases. They first compare GGA and LDA for the ambient B1 phase against existing lattice constants and bulk moduli, decide GGA fits experiment better, and then use only GGA to track enthalpies of B1, B2, and B3 as volume shrinks. The B1 remains stable at zero pressure and the crossover to B2 appears consistently; they also report the P-V relations and bulk moduli for the series. The uniform treatment across the full row is the part that adds something new. Earlier calculations usually picked one or two compounds, so having trend data under one protocol is practical for spotting patterns. The ambient validation gives the high-pressure numbers a bit of grounding. The soft spot is exactly what the stress test flags: GGA is known to delocalize 4f states, and the paper never checks whether that limitation grows worse once the lattice is compressed and the B2 phase becomes competitive. No DFT+U or hybrid runs are shown to see how much the transition pressures move. The abstract also leaves out k-point meshes, cutoffs, and pseudopotential details, so convergence is hard to judge from the text alone. This is useful for people who need starting values for high-pressure rare-earth oxides or geophysical equations of state. A reader in that niche can take the numbers as a baseline and improve on them. It is not a methods paper and will not shift how f-electron systems are modeled in general. I would send it to peer review. Referees can ask for the missing technical parameters and a short test with +U on two or three compounds to quantify the uncertainty in the transition pressures. The calculation itself is straightforward and the series coverage is new enough to justify the time.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses DFT to examine lanthanide monoxides (LaO to LuO) in the B1 (NaCl-type) structure at ambient pressure, comparing GGA and LDA results to experiment and finding GGA superior for lattice constants and bulk moduli. It then applies GGA to explore high-pressure behavior, reporting that B1 is the lowest-enthalpy phase at ambient conditions for all fifteen compounds while B2 (CsCl-type) becomes favored at elevated pressures; B3 (ZnS-type) is considered but not competitive. The work also presents the pressure-volume equation of state and associated bulk moduli.

Significance. If the GGA-based transition pressures hold, the study supplies a systematic, element-by-element prediction of a universal B1-to-B2 transition across the entire lanthanide monoxide series. This could serve as a useful guide for future high-pressure experiments on f-electron materials and for modeling their behavior under compression. The ambient-pressure validation against existing experimental data for the B1 phase provides a concrete benchmark that strengthens the baseline calculations.

major comments (2)

Abstract and high-pressure study: the decision to restrict the high-pressure analysis to GGA is justified solely by its better agreement with ambient-pressure B1 data, yet this does not test whether the same functional remains reliable for B1-B2 enthalpy crossovers once volumes are reduced, where 4f hybridization and correlation effects may shift.
Computational details section: the manuscript omits essential parameters such as k-point sampling densities, plane-wave cutoffs, pseudopotential choices, and convergence criteria for energy and forces. Without these, the numerical accuracy of the reported transition pressures and bulk moduli cannot be assessed or reproduced.

minor comments (1)

The presentation would be improved by adding uncertainty estimates or sensitivity tests on the computed transition pressures to indicate how robust the universal B1-B2 claim is to small variations in computational settings.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract and high-pressure study: the decision to restrict the high-pressure analysis to GGA is justified solely by its better agreement with ambient-pressure B1 data, yet this does not test whether the same functional remains reliable for B1-B2 enthalpy crossovers once volumes are reduced, where 4f hybridization and correlation effects may shift.

Authors: We acknowledge that the justification for employing GGA rests on its improved description of the ambient-pressure B1 phase relative to LDA. While GGA is routinely applied to high-pressure structural transitions in f-electron systems, we agree that its performance for enthalpy crossovers at compressed volumes is not independently validated here. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in the Discussion section that explicitly notes this limitation, states that the reported transition pressures should be regarded as indicative, and suggests that future studies incorporating DFT+U or hybrid functionals would be valuable to assess possible shifts arising from enhanced 4f hybridization. revision: partial
Referee: Computational details section: the manuscript omits essential parameters such as k-point sampling densities, plane-wave cutoffs, pseudopotential choices, and convergence criteria for energy and forces. Without these, the numerical accuracy of the reported transition pressures and bulk moduli cannot be assessed or reproduced.

Authors: We thank the referee for identifying this omission. The revised manuscript now contains an expanded Computational Methods section that specifies all required parameters: a plane-wave cutoff of 520 eV, Monkhorst-Pack k-point meshes with a reciprocal-space density of 0.025 Å⁻¹, projector-augmented-wave pseudopotentials, and convergence thresholds of 10^{-6} eV for total energy and 0.01 eV/Å for forces. These settings were used uniformly for all enthalpy and equation-of-state calculations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard DFT validation against external ambient data followed by direct high-pressure enthalpy computation

full rationale

The paper computes total energies and enthalpies for B1, B2, and B3 structures using standard GGA and LDA functionals in a DFT code. Ambient-pressure lattice constants and bulk moduli are compared to independent experimental literature values to select GGA; high-pressure B1-B2 crossovers are then obtained by direct minimization of H(P) = E(V) + PV for each compound. No parameters are fitted to the transition pressures themselves, no self-citations supply the central result, and the derivation does not reduce any claimed prediction to a redefinition or renormalization of its own inputs. The chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard DFT approximations being adequate for these f-electron systems and on enthalpy minimization correctly identifying thermodynamic stability; no new entities or fitted parameters are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Density functional theory with GGA sufficiently approximates exchange-correlation effects to predict relative enthalpies and phase stability in lanthanide monoxides under pressure.
Paper selects GGA after comparing both GGA and LDA to ambient-pressure experiments and proceeds with GGA for high-pressure study.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5544 in / 1338 out tokens · 53440 ms · 2026-05-10T16:11:04.892414+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

[1]

E. G. Rauh and R. J. Ackermann, The first ionization potentials of neptunium and neptunium monoxide, J. Chem. Phys. 62 (1975) 1584

work page 1975
[2]

Murad and D

E. Murad and D. L. Hildenbrand, Dissociation energies of GdO, HoO, ErO, TmO, and LuO; correlation of results for the lanthanide monoxide series, J. Chem. Phys. 73 (1980) 4005 - 4011. 9

work page 1980
[4]

H. Gan, C. Zhang, X. Z. Du, P. Jiang, C. P. Niu, X. H. Zheng, Y . W. Yin, and X. G. Li, Insights into superconductivity of LaO from experiments and first-principles calculations, Phys. Rev. B 104 (2021) 054515

work page 2021
[5]

Shafiq, S

M. Shafiq, S. Arif, I. Ahmad, S. J. Asadabadi, M. Maqbool, and H. A. R. Aliabad, Elastic and mechanical properties of lanthanide monoxides, J. Alloys Compd. 618 (2015) 292-298

work page 2015
[7]

Zhong, H

W. Zhong, H. Zhang, E. Karaca, J. Zhou, S. Kawaguchi, H. Kadobayashi, X. Yu, D. Errandonea, B. Yue, and F. Hong, Pressure -Sensitive Multiple Superconducting Phases and Their Structural Origin in Van der Waals HfS 2 Up to 160 GPa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 066001

work page 2024
[8]

P. H. Sun, J. F. Zhang, K. Liu, Q. Han, and Z. Y . Lu, First -principles study of the superconductivity in LaO, Phys. Rev. B 104 (2021) 045121

work page 2021
[9]

Kaminaga, D

K. Kaminaga, D. Oka, T. Hasegawa, and T. Fukumura, Superconductivity of rock-salt structure LaO epitaxial thin film, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 6754-6757

work page 2018
[10]

Jurkutat, C

M. Jurkutat, C. Kattinger, S. Tsankov, and J. Haase, How pressure enhances the critical temperature of superconductivity in YBa2Cu3O6+y, PNAS 120 (2023) e22154581

work page 2023
[11]

C, X, Chi, H. Xie, R. Cong, Z, C. Tang, and M. F. Zhou, Electron Affinities of the Early Lanthanide Monoxide Molecules, Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 24 (2011) 604-610

work page 2011
[12]

S. S. Harilal, E. J. Kautz, B. E. Bernacki, M. C. Phillips, P. J. Skrodzki, M. Burger, and I. Jovanovic, Physical conditions for UO formation in laser -produced uranium plumes, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 (2019) 16161-16169

work page 2019
[13]

Giannozzi, S

P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, S. de Gironcoli, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin- Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S. Sc...

work page 2009
[14]

J. P. Perdew, K, Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3865

work page 1996
[15]

Sahni, K

V . Sahni, K. P. Bohnen, and M. K. Harbola, Analysis of the local -density approximation of density-functional theory, Phys. Rev. A 37 (1988) 1895-1907

work page 1988
[16]

J. P. Attfiled and G. Ferey, Structural correlations within the lanthanum palladium oxide family, J. Sol. State Chem. 80 (1989) 286-298

work page 1989
[17]

A. B. Garg, A. Muñoz, S. Anzellini, J. Sanchez -Martín, R. Turnbull, D. Díaz - Anichtchenko, C. Popescu, and D. Errandonea, Role of GdO addition in the structural stability of cubic Gd2O3 at high pressures: Determination of the equation of states of GdO and Gd2O3, Materialia 34 (2024) 102064

work page 2024
[18]

H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B 13 (1976) 5188-5192

work page 1976
[19]

Birch, Finite Elastic Strain of Cubic Crystals, Phys

F. Birch, Finite Elastic Strain of Cubic Crystals, Phys. Rev. 71 (1947) 809-824

work page 1947
[20]

J. M. Leger, N. Yacoubi, and J. Loriers, Synthesis of rare earth monoxides, J. Sol. State Chem. 36 (1981) 261-270

work page 1981
[21]

S. D. Griesemer, L. Ward, and C. Wolverton, High- throughput crystal structure solution using prototypes, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5 (2021) 105003

work page 2021
[22]

J. M. Leger, N. Yacoubi, and J. Loriers, Mater. Res. Bull. 14, 1431 (1979)

work page 1979
[23]

Krill, M.F

G. Krill, M.F. Ravet, J.P. Kappler, L. Abadli, J.M. Leger, N. Yacoubi, and C. Loriers, Magnetic properties of some rare earth monoxides LnO (Ln = Pr, Nd, Sm) mixed valence state of SmO, Sol. State Comm. 33 (1980) 351-353

work page 1980
[24]

Kobayashi, A

S. Kobayashi, A. Martín-Cid, K. Toyoki, H. Okazaki, S. Hirosawa, and T. Nakamura, Influence of magnetostriction on the lattice constants of the secondary phases in Nd -Fe- B sintered magnets studied by synchrotron X -ray diffraction, AIP Advances 9 (2019) 25154

work page 2019
[25]

H. A. Eick, N. C. Baezinger, and L. Eyring, Lower oxides of samarium and europium. The preparation and crystal structure of SmO0.4-0.6, SmO and EuO, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 78 (1956) 5147-5149

work page 1956
[26]

J. M. Leger, P. Aimonino, J. Loriers, P. Dordor, and B Coqblin, Transport properties of SmO, Phys. Lett. A 80 (1980) 325-327

work page 1980
[27]

B. T. Matthias, R. M. Bozorth and J. H. Van Vleck, Ferromagnetic Interaction in EuO, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7 (1961) 160-161. 11

work page 1961
[28]

Namba, H

M. Namba, H. Takatsu, R. Mikita, Y . Sijia, K. Murayama, H.- B. Li, R. Terada, C. Tassel, H. Ubukata, M. Ochi, R. Saez-Puche, E. Palacios Latasa, N. Ishimatsu, D. Shiga, H. Kumigashira, K. Kinjo, S. Kitagawa, K. Ishida, T. Terashima, K. Fujita, T. Mashiko, K. Yanagisawa, K. Kimoto, and H. Kageyama, Large perpendicular magnetic anisotropy induced by an int...

work page 2023
[29]

Yamamoto, K

T. Yamamoto, K. Kaminaga, D. Saito, D. Oka, and T. Fukumura, Rock salt structure GdO epitaxial thin film with a high ferromagnetic Curie temperature, Appl. Phys. Lett. 117 (2020) 052402

work page 2020
[30]

Sasaki, D

S. Sasaki, D. Oka, K. Kaminaga, D. Saito, T. Yamamoto, N. Abe, H. Shimizu, and T. Fukumura, A high-Tc heavy rare earth monoxide semiconductor TbO with a more than half-filled 4f orbital, Dalton Trans. 51 (2022) 16648–16652

work page 2022
[31]

Amrillah, D

T. Amrillah, D. Oka, H. Shimizu, S. Sasaki, D. Saito, K. Kaminaga, and T. Fukumura, Rock salt-type HoO epitaxial thin film as a heavy rare- earth monoxide ferromagnetic semiconductor with a Curie temperature above 130 K, Appl. Phys. Lett. 120 (2022) 082403

work page 2022
[32]

J. M. Leger, J. Maugrion, L. Albert, J. C. Achard, and C. Lories, High pressure synthesis of ytterbium oxides (YbO and Yb 3O4), C. R. Acad. Sci. Serie C, Sciences Chimiques 286, 201 (1978)

work page 1978
[33]

Fishel, J.M

N.A. Fishel, J.M. Haschke, and H.A. Eick, Preparation of ytterbium and europium oxides in liquid ammonia, Inor. Chem. 9 (1970) 413-414

work page 1970
[34]

J. M. Leger, N. Yacoubi, J. Loriers, G.J. McCarthy, J.J. Rhyne, and H.B. Silber (Eds.), The rare earths in modern science and technology, V ol. 2, Plenum Press, New York and London (1979), p. 203

work page 1979
[35]

G. X. Zhang, A. M. Reilly, A. Tkatchenko, and M. Scheffler, Performance of various density-functional approximations for cohesive properties of 64 bulk solids, New J. Phys. 20 (2018) 063020

work page 2018
[36]

Söderlind, P

P. Söderlind, P. E. A. Turchi, A. Landa, and V . Lordi, Ground-state properties of rare- earth metals: an evaluation of density-functional theory, J. Phys.: Cond. Matter 26 (2014) 416001. [37] K. A. Gschneidner Jr., Systematics in lanthanide and actinide solids, J. Alloys Compd. 223 (1995) 165-169

work page 2014
[37]

Horne, P

M. Horne, P. Strange, W. M. Temmerman, Z. Szotek, A. Svane, and H. Winter, The electronic structure of europium chalcogenides and pnictides, J. Phys.: Cond. Matter 16 (2004) 5061. 12

work page 2004
[38]

Johansson, Nature of the electrons in the actinide series, Phys

B. Johansson, Nature of the electrons in the actinide series, Phys. Rev. B 11, 2740 (1975)

work page 1975
[39]

Kalpana, B

G. Kalpana, B. Palanivel, and M. Rajagopalan, Electronic and structural properties of alkaline-earth oxides under high pressure, Phys. Rev. B 52, (1995) 4-7

work page 1995
[40]

H. Liu, H. K. Mao, M. Somayazulu, Y . Ding, Y . Meng, and D. Häusermann, B1-to- B2 phase transition of transition- metal monoxide under strong compression, Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004) 094114

work page 2004
[41]

C. E. Sims, G. D. Barrera, N. L. Allan, and W. C. Mackrodt, Thermodynamics and mechanism of the B1 -B2 phase transition in group- I halides and group- II oxides, Phys. Rev. B 57 (1998) 11164

work page 1998
[42]

Richet, H.K

P. Richet, H.K. Mao, P.M. Bell, Static compression and equation of state of CaO to 1.35 Mbar, J. Geophys. Res. 93(1988) 15279-15288

work page 1988
[43]

H. K. Mao and P. M. Bell, Equations of state of MgO and ε Fe under static pressure conditions, J. Geophys. Res. 84 (1979) 4533-4536. 13 Figure 1: Crystal structure of the (a) B1, (b) B2, and (B3) phases. The blue (yellow) spheres represent the lanthanide (oxygen) atoms. 14 Figure 2: Enthalpy versus pressure for (a) LaO, (b) CeO, (c) PrO, and (d) NdO. 15 F...

work page 1979

[1] [1]

E. G. Rauh and R. J. Ackermann, The first ionization potentials of neptunium and neptunium monoxide, J. Chem. Phys. 62 (1975) 1584

work page 1975

[2] [2]

Murad and D

E. Murad and D. L. Hildenbrand, Dissociation energies of GdO, HoO, ErO, TmO, and LuO; correlation of results for the lanthanide monoxide series, J. Chem. Phys. 73 (1980) 4005 - 4011. 9

work page 1980

[3] [4]

H. Gan, C. Zhang, X. Z. Du, P. Jiang, C. P. Niu, X. H. Zheng, Y . W. Yin, and X. G. Li, Insights into superconductivity of LaO from experiments and first-principles calculations, Phys. Rev. B 104 (2021) 054515

work page 2021

[4] [5]

Shafiq, S

M. Shafiq, S. Arif, I. Ahmad, S. J. Asadabadi, M. Maqbool, and H. A. R. Aliabad, Elastic and mechanical properties of lanthanide monoxides, J. Alloys Compd. 618 (2015) 292-298

work page 2015

[5] [7]

Zhong, H

W. Zhong, H. Zhang, E. Karaca, J. Zhou, S. Kawaguchi, H. Kadobayashi, X. Yu, D. Errandonea, B. Yue, and F. Hong, Pressure -Sensitive Multiple Superconducting Phases and Their Structural Origin in Van der Waals HfS 2 Up to 160 GPa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 066001

work page 2024

[6] [8]

P. H. Sun, J. F. Zhang, K. Liu, Q. Han, and Z. Y . Lu, First -principles study of the superconductivity in LaO, Phys. Rev. B 104 (2021) 045121

work page 2021

[7] [9]

Kaminaga, D

K. Kaminaga, D. Oka, T. Hasegawa, and T. Fukumura, Superconductivity of rock-salt structure LaO epitaxial thin film, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 6754-6757

work page 2018

[8] [10]

Jurkutat, C

M. Jurkutat, C. Kattinger, S. Tsankov, and J. Haase, How pressure enhances the critical temperature of superconductivity in YBa2Cu3O6+y, PNAS 120 (2023) e22154581

work page 2023

[9] [11]

C, X, Chi, H. Xie, R. Cong, Z, C. Tang, and M. F. Zhou, Electron Affinities of the Early Lanthanide Monoxide Molecules, Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 24 (2011) 604-610

work page 2011

[10] [12]

S. S. Harilal, E. J. Kautz, B. E. Bernacki, M. C. Phillips, P. J. Skrodzki, M. Burger, and I. Jovanovic, Physical conditions for UO formation in laser -produced uranium plumes, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 (2019) 16161-16169

work page 2019

[11] [13]

Giannozzi, S

P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, S. de Gironcoli, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin- Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S. Sc...

work page 2009

[12] [14]

J. P. Perdew, K, Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3865

work page 1996

[13] [15]

Sahni, K

V . Sahni, K. P. Bohnen, and M. K. Harbola, Analysis of the local -density approximation of density-functional theory, Phys. Rev. A 37 (1988) 1895-1907

work page 1988

[14] [16]

J. P. Attfiled and G. Ferey, Structural correlations within the lanthanum palladium oxide family, J. Sol. State Chem. 80 (1989) 286-298

work page 1989

[15] [17]

A. B. Garg, A. Muñoz, S. Anzellini, J. Sanchez -Martín, R. Turnbull, D. Díaz - Anichtchenko, C. Popescu, and D. Errandonea, Role of GdO addition in the structural stability of cubic Gd2O3 at high pressures: Determination of the equation of states of GdO and Gd2O3, Materialia 34 (2024) 102064

work page 2024

[16] [18]

H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B 13 (1976) 5188-5192

work page 1976

[17] [19]

Birch, Finite Elastic Strain of Cubic Crystals, Phys

F. Birch, Finite Elastic Strain of Cubic Crystals, Phys. Rev. 71 (1947) 809-824

work page 1947

[18] [20]

J. M. Leger, N. Yacoubi, and J. Loriers, Synthesis of rare earth monoxides, J. Sol. State Chem. 36 (1981) 261-270

work page 1981

[19] [21]

S. D. Griesemer, L. Ward, and C. Wolverton, High- throughput crystal structure solution using prototypes, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5 (2021) 105003

work page 2021

[20] [22]

J. M. Leger, N. Yacoubi, and J. Loriers, Mater. Res. Bull. 14, 1431 (1979)

work page 1979

[21] [23]

Krill, M.F

G. Krill, M.F. Ravet, J.P. Kappler, L. Abadli, J.M. Leger, N. Yacoubi, and C. Loriers, Magnetic properties of some rare earth monoxides LnO (Ln = Pr, Nd, Sm) mixed valence state of SmO, Sol. State Comm. 33 (1980) 351-353

work page 1980

[22] [24]

Kobayashi, A

S. Kobayashi, A. Martín-Cid, K. Toyoki, H. Okazaki, S. Hirosawa, and T. Nakamura, Influence of magnetostriction on the lattice constants of the secondary phases in Nd -Fe- B sintered magnets studied by synchrotron X -ray diffraction, AIP Advances 9 (2019) 25154

work page 2019

[23] [25]

H. A. Eick, N. C. Baezinger, and L. Eyring, Lower oxides of samarium and europium. The preparation and crystal structure of SmO0.4-0.6, SmO and EuO, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 78 (1956) 5147-5149

work page 1956

[24] [26]

J. M. Leger, P. Aimonino, J. Loriers, P. Dordor, and B Coqblin, Transport properties of SmO, Phys. Lett. A 80 (1980) 325-327

work page 1980

[25] [27]

B. T. Matthias, R. M. Bozorth and J. H. Van Vleck, Ferromagnetic Interaction in EuO, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7 (1961) 160-161. 11

work page 1961

[26] [28]

Namba, H

M. Namba, H. Takatsu, R. Mikita, Y . Sijia, K. Murayama, H.- B. Li, R. Terada, C. Tassel, H. Ubukata, M. Ochi, R. Saez-Puche, E. Palacios Latasa, N. Ishimatsu, D. Shiga, H. Kumigashira, K. Kinjo, S. Kitagawa, K. Ishida, T. Terashima, K. Fujita, T. Mashiko, K. Yanagisawa, K. Kimoto, and H. Kageyama, Large perpendicular magnetic anisotropy induced by an int...

work page 2023

[27] [29]

Yamamoto, K

T. Yamamoto, K. Kaminaga, D. Saito, D. Oka, and T. Fukumura, Rock salt structure GdO epitaxial thin film with a high ferromagnetic Curie temperature, Appl. Phys. Lett. 117 (2020) 052402

work page 2020

[28] [30]

Sasaki, D

S. Sasaki, D. Oka, K. Kaminaga, D. Saito, T. Yamamoto, N. Abe, H. Shimizu, and T. Fukumura, A high-Tc heavy rare earth monoxide semiconductor TbO with a more than half-filled 4f orbital, Dalton Trans. 51 (2022) 16648–16652

work page 2022

[29] [31]

Amrillah, D

T. Amrillah, D. Oka, H. Shimizu, S. Sasaki, D. Saito, K. Kaminaga, and T. Fukumura, Rock salt-type HoO epitaxial thin film as a heavy rare- earth monoxide ferromagnetic semiconductor with a Curie temperature above 130 K, Appl. Phys. Lett. 120 (2022) 082403

work page 2022

[30] [32]

J. M. Leger, J. Maugrion, L. Albert, J. C. Achard, and C. Lories, High pressure synthesis of ytterbium oxides (YbO and Yb 3O4), C. R. Acad. Sci. Serie C, Sciences Chimiques 286, 201 (1978)

work page 1978

[31] [33]

Fishel, J.M

N.A. Fishel, J.M. Haschke, and H.A. Eick, Preparation of ytterbium and europium oxides in liquid ammonia, Inor. Chem. 9 (1970) 413-414

work page 1970

[32] [34]

J. M. Leger, N. Yacoubi, J. Loriers, G.J. McCarthy, J.J. Rhyne, and H.B. Silber (Eds.), The rare earths in modern science and technology, V ol. 2, Plenum Press, New York and London (1979), p. 203

work page 1979

[33] [35]

G. X. Zhang, A. M. Reilly, A. Tkatchenko, and M. Scheffler, Performance of various density-functional approximations for cohesive properties of 64 bulk solids, New J. Phys. 20 (2018) 063020

work page 2018

[34] [36]

Söderlind, P

P. Söderlind, P. E. A. Turchi, A. Landa, and V . Lordi, Ground-state properties of rare- earth metals: an evaluation of density-functional theory, J. Phys.: Cond. Matter 26 (2014) 416001. [37] K. A. Gschneidner Jr., Systematics in lanthanide and actinide solids, J. Alloys Compd. 223 (1995) 165-169

work page 2014

[35] [37]

Horne, P

M. Horne, P. Strange, W. M. Temmerman, Z. Szotek, A. Svane, and H. Winter, The electronic structure of europium chalcogenides and pnictides, J. Phys.: Cond. Matter 16 (2004) 5061. 12

work page 2004

[36] [38]

Johansson, Nature of the electrons in the actinide series, Phys

B. Johansson, Nature of the electrons in the actinide series, Phys. Rev. B 11, 2740 (1975)

work page 1975

[37] [39]

Kalpana, B

G. Kalpana, B. Palanivel, and M. Rajagopalan, Electronic and structural properties of alkaline-earth oxides under high pressure, Phys. Rev. B 52, (1995) 4-7

work page 1995

[38] [40]

H. Liu, H. K. Mao, M. Somayazulu, Y . Ding, Y . Meng, and D. Häusermann, B1-to- B2 phase transition of transition- metal monoxide under strong compression, Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004) 094114

work page 2004

[39] [41]

C. E. Sims, G. D. Barrera, N. L. Allan, and W. C. Mackrodt, Thermodynamics and mechanism of the B1 -B2 phase transition in group- I halides and group- II oxides, Phys. Rev. B 57 (1998) 11164

work page 1998

[40] [42]

Richet, H.K

P. Richet, H.K. Mao, P.M. Bell, Static compression and equation of state of CaO to 1.35 Mbar, J. Geophys. Res. 93(1988) 15279-15288

work page 1988

[41] [43]

H. K. Mao and P. M. Bell, Equations of state of MgO and ε Fe under static pressure conditions, J. Geophys. Res. 84 (1979) 4533-4536. 13 Figure 1: Crystal structure of the (a) B1, (b) B2, and (B3) phases. The blue (yellow) spheres represent the lanthanide (oxygen) atoms. 14 Figure 2: Enthalpy versus pressure for (a) LaO, (b) CeO, (c) PrO, and (d) NdO. 15 F...

work page 1979