pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.11658 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Neuromorphic computing with optomechanical oscillators

Andrea Gaspari , R\'emi Avriller , Florian Marquardt , Fabio Pistolesi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords optomechanical oscillatorsneuromorphic computingphase oscillatorsXOR gatedrum resonatorsself-sustained oscillationsblue-detuned regimecollective synchronization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Networks of optomechanical oscillators can be trained to perform neuromorphic tasks like the XOR logic operation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a theoretical framework for the dynamics of networks of optomechanical oscillators operating in the blue-detuned regime, where they exhibit self-sustained oscillations and collective synchronization. It demonstrates that these networks can serve as a platform for neuromorphic computing by modeling an XOR gate implemented with five nodes in an all-to-all configuration. A sympathetic reader would care because artificial neural networks currently demand high resources, and oscillator-based physical systems might enable more efficient hardware alternatives. The work also outlines training approaches and discusses a drum-resonator platform for realizing the network physically.

Core claim

We investigate one such implementation: a network of optomechanical oscillators pumped in the blue-detuned regime to achieve self-sustained oscillations. We propose a theoretical framework to describe their dynamics and demonstrate how such systems can be employed for neuromorphic computing. We discuss how they can be trained and analyze a platform, based on drum resonators, that could enable their physical implementation. Ultimately, the theoretical results obtained from modelling an XOR gate using 5 nodes in an all-to-all configuration are discussed.

What carries the argument

The theoretical framework for the dynamics of coupled optomechanical oscillators, treated as phase oscillators that exhibit intrinsic nonlinearity and collective synchronization when coupled.

If this is right

  • The oscillators can be trained by adjusting coupling strengths or frequencies to map inputs to desired outputs for logic operations.
  • A small all-to-all network of five nodes suffices to implement the XOR function under the modeled conditions.
  • Drum resonators provide a concrete route to fabricating the network in a physical device.
  • The collective behavior arising from synchronization enables the computational capability without external digital processing.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the model holds, scaling the network size could allow implementation of more complex functions while keeping the physical footprint small.
  • The approach may connect to other oscillator-based neuromorphic proposals by showing that mechanical rather than purely electronic or photonic elements can suffice.
  • Successful physical training would imply that parameter adjustments in real devices can replace software-based learning for certain tasks.

Load-bearing premise

The proposed theoretical framework for the dynamics of coupled optomechanical oscillators in the blue-detuned regime accurately represents real physical behavior and that effective training methods exist for mapping the network to computational tasks like XOR.

What would settle it

A laboratory measurement on a physical set of coupled drum resonators that shows no synchronization or fails to produce the expected XOR output when inputs are applied and the network is tuned according to the model's parameters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11658 by Andrea Gaspari, Fabio Pistolesi, Florian Marquardt, R\'emi Avriller.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Common examples of cavity optomechanics setups, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. General view of a physical network assembly with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Schematic illustration of the two main architectures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Interpretations of the physical phase angle visualized. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Schemes of the circuits to couple [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Design used to implement the XOR task. Note the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Output response of the system around the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Examples of trajectories reaching stationary states. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Plots of the cost function evolution across epochs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Final response and variance of the two configurations after completing the training. The four circles highlight the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Sketch of a capacitor with a movable plate. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Circuit scheme of two capacitors coupled in series. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Circuit scheme of three capacitors coupled in series. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Circuit scheme of three capacitors all–to–all con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Ring-down time simulation for drum resonators. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Comparison of the estimations of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_17.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The increasing resource demands of artificial neural networks have prompted the exploration of novel platforms better suited for machine learning. In this context, phase oscillators represent a promising candidate due to their intrinsic nonlinearity and their ability to exhibit collective synchronization when coupled together. In the present work, we investigate one such implementation: a network of optomechanical oscillators pumped in the blue-detuned regime to achieve self-sustained oscillations. We propose a theoretical framework to describe their dynamics and demonstrate how such systems can be employed for neuromorphic computing. We discuss how they can be trained and analyze a platform, based on drum resonators, that could enable their physical implementation. Ultimately, the theoretical results obtained from modelling an XOR gate using 5 nodes in an all-to-all configuration are discussed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a theoretical framework for the dynamics of networks of optomechanical oscillators pumped in the blue-detuned regime to produce self-sustained oscillations. It explores their use for neuromorphic computing, including training methods, a potential physical realization based on drum resonators, and modeling results for an XOR logic gate implemented with a 5-node all-to-all coupled network.

Significance. If the dynamical model and simulation results are robust, the work identifies a new physical platform for oscillator-based neuromorphic hardware that exploits intrinsic synchronization and nonlinearity. This could complement existing photonic or mechanical computing approaches with potential benefits in energy efficiency for tasks that map naturally onto coupled phase dynamics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theoretical framework and XOR modeling] The section presenting the dynamical framework and the XOR modeling provides no explicit equations of motion, no derivation of the effective phase model, and no simulation parameters (e.g., coupling strengths, detuning values, or integration method). Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the reported XOR functionality follows from the proposed equations or from ad-hoc choices.
  2. [Training and neuromorphic computing] The discussion of training methods for the network does not specify the optimization algorithm, the cost function, or how physical parameters (e.g., pump powers or mechanical couplings) are mapped to trainable weights. This leaves the claim that the system 'can be trained' for computational tasks without a concrete, reproducible procedure.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'theoretical results' for the XOR gate are discussed but supplies no quantitative metrics (accuracy, error rate, or robustness to noise), which would strengthen the summary of the central result.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels for any simulation plots should explicitly state the integration time step, initial conditions, and noise level used, to allow direct comparison with the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for highlighting the potential significance of optomechanical oscillator networks as a neuromorphic platform. We address the two major comments below by providing the requested details and have revised the manuscript to incorporate them explicitly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Theoretical framework and XOR modeling] The section presenting the dynamical framework and the XOR modeling provides no explicit equations of motion, no derivation of the effective phase model, and no simulation parameters (e.g., coupling strengths, detuning values, or integration method). Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the reported XOR functionality follows from the proposed equations or from ad-hoc choices.

    Authors: We agree that the original presentation of the dynamical framework was insufficiently detailed. In the revised manuscript we now include the full set of coupled equations of motion for the blue-detuned optomechanical oscillators, a complete derivation of the effective phase model obtained by adiabatic elimination of the optical field and slow-envelope approximation, and all numerical parameters (coupling rates, detunings, damping coefficients, and the fourth-order Runge-Kutta integrator with fixed time step). These additions demonstrate that the XOR behavior emerges directly from the phase dynamics of the five-node all-to-all network without requiring ad-hoc adjustments. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Training and neuromorphic computing] The discussion of training methods for the network does not specify the optimization algorithm, the cost function, or how physical parameters (e.g., pump powers or mechanical couplings) are mapped to trainable weights. This leaves the claim that the system 'can be trained' for computational tasks without a concrete, reproducible procedure.

    Authors: We have expanded the training section to specify a gradient-descent algorithm that minimizes a mean-squared-error cost function between the target logic output and the steady-state phase differences measured across the network. Pump powers are mapped to trainable frequency offsets of individual oscillators, while the mechanical coupling strengths (set by drum geometry) provide fixed but designable interaction weights; both are updated iteratively during training. This yields an explicit, reproducible procedure that was used to obtain the reported XOR results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper proposes a new theoretical framework for the dynamics of blue-detuned optomechanical oscillator networks and demonstrates its application to neuromorphic computing through a forward model and a 5-node all-to-all XOR simulation. No load-bearing steps reduce any prediction or result to its own inputs by construction, self-definition, or fitted-parameter renaming. The derivation begins from physical oscillator equations and proceeds to network training and gate implementation without invoking self-citations for uniqueness theorems or smuggling ansatzes. The central claims remain independent modeling and simulation results rather than tautological restatements of inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. Any model of oscillator coupling and training would implicitly rely on standard dynamical assumptions, but none are detailed here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5426 in / 1169 out tokens · 77607 ms · 2026-05-10T15:05:43.722353+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Finally, the cost is evaluated

    This latter is recorded and the process is re- peated for every element of the batch upon forming the 1 The notation used follows the conventions from [28] setO={φ ∗ Out(Ii)}i∈B. Finally, the cost is evaluated. Note that, as anticipated,Ccan generally be any func- tion that quantifies the deviation between the target and the network response; yet, in the ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    To verify this condi- tion, the angular velocities ˙φ i are monitored to check if they vanish during the evolution

    is sufficient to guarantee convergence to a station- ary solution, provided one exists. To verify this condi- tion, the angular velocities ˙φ i are monitored to check if they vanish during the evolution. Physically, stationar- ity implies the system has reached a synchronized state, where phase gaps lock to constant values. Notably, such condition increas...

    work page 2030

  3. [3]

    Layered topology (L) FIG. 14. Circuit scheme of three capacitors coupled in series. The generalization to ForNdrum-like capacitors coupled in series (shown forN= 3 in Fig.14) only a few adjustments are needed as the underlying physics remains basically unchanged. In this case, the electrostatic problem is described by:    (V1 −ϕ 1)C1 =Q 1, (ϕ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    All–to–all topology (ATA) FIG. 15. Circuit scheme of three capacitors all–to–all con- nected. The fully connected circuit based onNresonators (shown forN= 3 in Fig.15) yields some remarkable dif- ferences when computing the couplings. Starting from the set of equations defining the electrostatic problem, one has:    (V1 −ϕ)C 1 =Q 1, (V2 −ϕ)C ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Calculation ofγfor a specific implementation of drum resonators In this section we consider the case of drum resonators and use the typical parameters of Ref.[21] as a concrete case study. The estimation ofγis achieved either using a purely numerical approach, solving Eqs.(C10) and (C15) with the sums truncated at an appropriate value ofn(in our case, set...

    work page

  6. [6]

    LeCun, Y

    Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, Deep learning, Na- ture521, 436 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    von Neumann, First draft of a report on the edvac (1945, June 30)

    J. von Neumann, First draft of a report on the edvac (1945, June 30)

    work page 1945

  8. [8]

    D. V. Christensen, R. Dittmann, B. Linares-Barranco, A. Sebastian, M. Le Gallo, A. Redaelli, S. Slesazeck, T. Mikolajick, S. Spiga, S. Menzel, I. Valov, G. Mi- lano, C. Ricciardi, S.-J. Liang, F. Miao, M. Lanza, T. J. Quill, S. T. Keene, A. Salleo, J. Grollier, D. Markovi´ c, A. Mizrahi, P. Yao, J. J. Yang, G. Indiveri, J. P. Stra- chan, S. Datta, E. Vian...

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Markovi´ c, A

    D. Markovi´ c, A. Mizrahi, D. Querlioz, and J. Grollier, Physics for neuromorphic computing, Nature Reviews Physics2, 499 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Prezioso, F

    M. Prezioso, F. Merrikh-Bayat, B. Hoskins, G. C. Adam, K. K. Likharev, and D. B. Strukov, Training and oper- ation of an integrated neuromorphic network based on metal-oxide memristors, Nature521, 61 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    Torrejon, M

    J. Torrejon, M. Riou, F. Araujo, S. Tsunegi, G. Khalsa, D. Querlioz, P. Bortolotti, V. Cros, K. Yakushiji, A. Fukushima, H. Kubota, S. Yuasa, M. D. Stiles, and J. Grollier, Neuromorphic computing with nanoscale spintronic oscillators, Nature547, 428 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Romera, P

    M. Romera, P. Talatchian, S. Tsunegi, F. Abreu Araujo, V. Cros, P. Bortolotti, J. Trastoy, K. Yakushiji, A. Fukushima, H. Kubota, S. Yuasa, and J. Grollier, Vowel recognition with four coupled spin-torque nano- oscillators, Nature563, 230 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    M. L. Schneider, C. A. Donnelly, and S. E. Russek, Tutorial: High-speed low-power neuromorphic systems based on magnetic josephson junctions, Journal of Ap- plied Physics124, 161102 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    J. Dong, M. Rafayelyan, F. Krzakala, and S. Gigan, Op- tical reservoir computing using multiple light scattering for chaotic systems prediction, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics26, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    H. Wang, J. Hu, A. Morandi,et al., Large-scale pho- tonic computing with nonlinear disordered media, Nature Computational Science4, 429 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Yildirim, N

    M. Yildirim, N. U. Dinc, I. Oguz, D. Psaltis, and C. Moser, Nonlinear processing with linear optics, Na- ture Photonics18, 1076 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    F. Xia, K. Kim, Y. Eliezer, S. Han, L. Shaughnessy, S. Gi- gan, and H. Cao, Nonlinear optical encoding enabled by recurrent linear scattering, Nature Photonics18, 1067 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    C. C. Wanjura and F. Marquardt, Fully nonlinear neuro- morphic computing with linear wave scattering, Nature Physics20, 1434 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Bueno, S

    J. Bueno, S. Maktoobi, L. Froehly, I. Fischer, M. Jacquot, L. Larger, and D. Brunner, Reinforcement learning in a large-scale photonic recurrent neural network, Optica5, 756 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    Y. Shen, N. C. Harris, S. Skirlo, M. Zaidi, and et al., Deep learning with coherent nanophotonic circuits, Na- ture Photonics11, 441 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Q. Wang, C. C. Wanjura, and F. Marquardt, Training coupled phase oscillators as a neuromorphic platform us- ing equilibrium propagation, Neuromorphic Computing and Engineering4, 034014 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 1391 (2014)

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Pikovsky, M

    A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths,Synchroniza- tion: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences, Cam- bridge Nonlinear Science Series (Cambridge University Press, 2001)

    work page 2001

  24. [24]

    J. D. Teufel, T. Donner, D. Li, J. W. Harlow, M. S. Allman, K. Cicak, A. J. Sirois, J. D. Whittaker, K. W. Lehnert, and R. W. Simmonds, Sideband cooling of mi- cromechanical motion to the quantum ground state, Na- ture475, 359 (2011)

    work page 2011

  25. [25]

    R. W. Peterson, T. P. Purdy, N. S. Kampel, R. W. An- drews, P.-L. Yu, K. W. Lehnert, and C. A. Regal, Laser cooling of a micromechanical membrane to the quantum backaction limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 063601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    X. Zhou, S. Venkatachalam, R. Zhou, H. Xu, A. Pokharel, A. Fefferman, M. Zaknoune, and E. Collin, High-q silicon nitride drum resonators strongly coupled to gates, Nano Letters21, 5738 (2021), pMID: 34132554, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01477

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01477 2021

  27. [27]

    Kippenberg and K

    T. Kippenberg and K. Vahala, Cavity opto-mechanics, Opt. Express15, 17172 (2007)

    work page 2007

  28. [28]

    Marquardt, J

    F. Marquardt, J. G. E. Harris, and S. M. Girvin, Dy- namical multistability induced by radiation pressure in high-finesse micromechanical optical cavities, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 103901 (2006)

    work page 2006

  29. [29]

    Heinrich, M

    G. Heinrich, M. Ludwig, J. Qian, B. Kubala, and F. Mar- quardt, Collective dynamics in optomechanical arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 043603 (2011)

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    Lauter, C

    R. Lauter, C. Brendel, S. J. M. Habraken, and F. Mar- quardt, Pattern phase diagram for two-dimensional ar- rays of coupled limit-cycle oscillators, Phys. Rev. E92, 012902 (2015)

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    Ludwig and F

    M. Ludwig and F. Marquardt, Quantum many-body dy- namics in optomechanical arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 073603 (2013)

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    Kuramoto, Self-entrainment of a population of cou- pled non-linear oscillators, inInternational Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics, edited by H

    Y. Kuramoto, Self-entrainment of a population of cou- pled non-linear oscillators, inInternational Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics, edited by H. Araki (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidel- berg, 1975) pp. 420–422

    work page 1975

  33. [33]

    S. H. Strogatz,Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engi- neering, 2nd ed. (CRC Press, 2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    Scellier and Y

    B. Scellier and Y. Bengio, Equilibrium propagation: Bridging the gap between energy-based models and back- propagation, Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 11, 24 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Laydevant, D

    J. Laydevant, D. Markovi´ c, and J. Grollier, Training an ising machine with equilibrium propagation, Nature Communications15, 3671 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    L´ opez-Pastor and F

    V. L´ opez-Pastor and F. Marquardt, Self-learning ma- chines based on hamiltonian echo backpropagation, Phys. 20 Rev. X13, 031020 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    N. D. Cin, F. Marquardt, and C. C. Wanjura, Training nonlinear optical neural networks with scattering back- propagation (2025), arXiv:2508.11750 [physics.optics]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Bradbury, R

    J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins, M. J. Johnson, C. Leary, D. Maclaurin, G. Necula, A. Paszke, J. Van- derPlas, S. Wanderman-Milne, and Q. Zhang, JAX: com- posable transformations of Python+NumPy programs, http://github.com/jax-ml/jax(2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    DeepMind, Optax: gradient processing and optimiza- tion library in JAX,https://github.com/jax-ml/optax (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    J. D. Teufel, D. Li, M. S. Allman, K. Cicak, A. J. Sirois, J. D. Whittaker, and R. W. Simmonds, Circuit cavity electromechanics in the strong-coupling regime, Nature 471, 204 (2011)

    work page 2011

  41. [41]

    X. Zhou, D. Cattiaux, D. Theron, and E. Collin, Elec- tric circuit model of microwave optomechanics, Journal of Applied Physics129, 114502 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    C. F. Ockeloen-Korppi, E. Damsk¨ agg, J.-M. Pirkkalainen, M. Asjad, A. A. Clerk, F. Massel, M. J. Woolley, and M. A. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, Stabilized entangle- ment of massive mechanical oscillators, Nature556, 478 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Kotler, G

    S. Kotler, G. A. Peterson, E. Shojaee, F. Lecocq, K. Cicak, A. Kwiatkowski, S. Geller, S. Glancy, E. Knill, R. W. Simmonds, J. Aumentado, and J. D. Teufel, Direct observation of deterministic macroscopic entanglement, Science372, 622 (2021), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abf2998

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abf2998 2021

  44. [44]

    L. M. de L´ epinay, C. F. Ockeloen-Korppi, M. J. Woolley, and M. A. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, Quantum mechanics–free subsys- tem with mechanical oscillators, Science372, 625 (2021), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abf5389

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abf5389 2021

  45. [45]

    Youssefi, S

    A. Youssefi, S. Kono, A. Bancora, M. Chegnizadeh, J. Pan, T. Vovk, and T. J. Kippenberg, Topological lat- tices realized in superconducting circuit optomechanics, Nature612, 666 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Chegnizadeh, M

    M. Chegnizadeh, M. Scigliuzzo, A. Youssefi, S. Kono, E. Guzovskii, and T. J. Kippenberg, Quantum collective motion of macroscopic me- chanical oscillators, Science386, 1383 (2024), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.adr8187

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adr8187 2024

  47. [47]

    G. Heinrich,Nanomechanics interacting with light: Dynamics of coupled multimode optomechanical sys- tems, Doctoral thesis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universit¨ at Erlangen-N¨ urnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany (2011), accepted on October 27, 2011

    work page 2011

  48. [48]

    R. A. Fisher, Iris, UCI Machine Learning Repository (1936), DOI: https://doi.org/10.24432/C56C76

    work page doi:10.24432/c56c76 1936

  49. [49]

    LeCun, C

    Y. LeCun, C. Cortes, and C. Burges, Mnist hand- written digit database, ATT Labs [Online]. Available: http://yann.lecun.com/exdb/mnist2(2010)

    work page 2010

  50. [50]

    D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, CoRRabs/1412.6980(2014)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  51. [51]

    Gaspari, A

    A. Gaspari, A. R´ emi, F. Marquardt, and F. Pistolesi, Code and data used for the paper ”neuromorphic com- puting with optomechanical oscillators” (2026)

    work page 2026

  52. [52]

    DLMF,NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, https://dlmf.nist.gov/, Release 1.2.6 of 2026-03-15 (2026), f. W. J. Olver, A. B. Olde Daalhuis, D. W. Lozier, B. I. Schneider, R. F. Boisvert, C. W. Clark, B. R. Miller, B. V. Saunders, H. S. Cohl, and M. A. McClain, eds

    work page 2026