Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 43 references

Geometry-controlled magnon-polaritons of double magnetic films in planar cavities

T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-05-21 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The magnon-photon coupling in planar cavities depends on the spatial positions of two magnetic films rather than their total volume.

desk verdict The paper adds a two-film scattering model that ties magnon-photon coupling to film positions inside the cavity, but the main validation only checks the merged single-film limit. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.11690 v2 pith:VZ2FEEDR submitted 2026-04-13 cond-mat.mes-hall

S. Solihin , Ahmad R. T. Nugraha , Muhammad Aziz Majidi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords magnon-polaritonplanarcavitydoublemagneticfilmsgeometry-controlledcouplingmagnon-photoninteractionmagnonicsstandingspinwaves
checked against Cost.FunctionalEquationalexander_duality_circle_linking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops a scattering theory for two magnetic films placed inside one microwave cavity. It demonstrates that the interaction between magnons and photons can be strengthened by positioning the films where the cavity field reaches its maximum and weakened by placing them at field nodes. This position dependence holds even when the combined magnetic volume remains fixed. The model recovers the known single-film result as a check and extends to cases with weak symmetry breaking and nonzero exchange interactions.

What carries the argument

two-film scattering theory in the macrospin limit that separates position-dependent coupling to cavity antinodes and nodes

What would settle it

Transmission measurements that vary the vertical separation of the two films from the cavity midplane and record changes in the avoided-crossing gap size would test the predicted position dependence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the macrospin limit the authors construct a two-film scattering theory that tracks how each film's location modulates its coupling to the cavity photon mode. Antinode-compatible placements produce larger avoided crossings while node-compatible placements suppress them. Weak symmetry breaking activates a previously dark mode, adding an extra spectral branch without eliminating the main hybrid avoided crossing.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes the macrospin limit inside each film and uses exact recovery of the single-film result when the two films are merged with zero gap.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Films at antinodes produce larger magnon-photon coupling than the same total volume placed uniformly.
  • Films at nodes produce smaller coupling and can nearly decouple from the cavity mode.
  • Weak symmetry breaking between the two films transfers finite weight to a mode that is dark under perfect symmetry.
  • A reduced multimode extension for nonzero exchange predicts separate bright and dark channels for odd-order standing spin-wave modes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Device engineers could use film positioning as an independent design knob to set hybrid-state splitting without altering material thickness or magnetization.
  • The same geometric principle may apply to stacks of three or more films, enabling selective activation of specific magnon branches.
  • Continuous translation of one film inside a fixed cavity would produce a smooth, predictable tuning curve for the coupling strength.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper develops a two-film scattering theory for magnon-polaritons in a planar cavity in the macrospin (J=0) limit. It benchmarks the model by recovering the known one-film result in the exact zero-gap half-thickness limit, then shows that magnon-photon coupling strength is controlled by the spatial positions of the two films relative to the cavity standing-wave field: antinode-compatible placements enhance the bright channel while node-compatible placements suppress it. Weak symmetry breaking is shown to transfer finite weight to an otherwise dark mode, and a reduced multimode theory is outlined for J≠0 that resolves family-resolved bright and dark channels for odd standing-spin-wave modes.

Significance. If the central geometry-control result holds, the work is significant for extending cavity magnonics beyond the single-film paradigm and identifying spatial placement as an independent tuning knob for coupling at fixed total magnetic volume. The explicit recovery of the established one-film limit provides a useful consistency check, and the prediction of an additional branch under weak symmetry breaking offers a falsifiable signature for future experiments.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and model derivation] Abstract and model-derivation paragraph: the central claim that coupling depends on spatial placement (rather than total magnetic volume) is asserted for separated films, yet the only explicit benchmark is recovery of the one-film result in the merged zero-gap half-thickness limit under the macrospin approximation. This merged configuration does not test the distinct-position regime (antinode vs. node placements) where the geometry-control effect is claimed; an explicit derivation or numerical check of the scattering matrix for displaced films at fixed total volume is needed to confirm that no unaccounted cross terms alter the effective bright-channel strength.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be clearer if it briefly indicated the key parameters (e.g., film thicknesses, cavity mode index, or normalization of the local field) entering the two-film scattering amplitudes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive suggestion to strengthen the validation of the geometry-control result. We address the major comment below and will incorporate the requested check in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and model derivation paragraph: the central claim that coupling depends on spatial placement (rather than total magnetic volume) is asserted for separated films, yet the only explicit benchmark is recovery of the one-film result in the merged zero-gap half-thickness limit under the macrospin approximation. This merged configuration does not test the distinct-position regime (antinode vs. node placements) where the geometry-control effect is claimed; an explicit derivation or numerical check of the scattering matrix for displaced films at fixed total volume is needed to confirm that no unaccounted cross terms alter the effective bright-channel strength.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit numerical verification for displaced films at fixed total volume would make the geometry-control claim more transparent. The two-film scattering matrix is derived for arbitrary positions (Eqs. 3–7), with each film’s coupling term proportional to the local cavity-field amplitude at its location; the zero-gap merged limit is used only as a consistency benchmark against the established single-film result. In the results section we already vary the two film positions independently while keeping total magnetic volume fixed, obtaining the reported enhancement and suppression. To directly address the referee’s concern we will add a new panel (or short subsection) that recomputes the full scattering matrix and extracted bright-channel coupling for representative antinode and node placements at constant total thickness, explicitly showing that the position dependence survives without additional cross terms. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Two-film scattering theory is self-contained with external benchmarking

full rationale

The paper derives a new two-film scattering theory in the macrospin (J=0) limit and explicitly benchmarks it by recovering the known one-film result in the exact zero-gap half-thickness limit. This recovery serves as an external consistency check rather than a self-referential fit. The central claim of geometry-controlled magnon-photon coupling (antinode vs. node placements at fixed total volume) follows from applying the derived scattering equations to distinct spatial configurations. No step reduces the position-dependent result to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or definitional equivalence by the paper's own equations. The derivation remains independent of the target claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on the macrospin approximation and standard cavity scattering assumptions; no new particles or forces are introduced.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Macrospin limit (J = 0) for each film
    Invoked to derive the full two-film scattering theory and to recover the zero-gap half-thickness limit.
  • standard math Standard planar cavity mode structure
    Used to define antinode and node placements for coupling enhancement or suppression.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Geometry-controlled magnon-polaritons of double magnetic films in planar cavities." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VZ2FEEDR

@misc{pith2026260411690,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Geometry-controlled magnon-polaritons of double magnetic films in planar cavities},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VZ2FEEDR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.11690}
}
abstract

Planar cavity magnonics has been developed mainly for a single magnetic film, leaving multilayer behavior in spatially resolved cavity scattering largely unexplored. Here, we introduce a double layer planar cavity with two magnetic films embedded in the same microwave cavity to derive a full two-film scattering theory in the macrospin ($J = 0$) limit and recover the exact zero-gap half-thickness limit, thereby benchmarking the model against the known one-film result. We find that the double layer model actively enables geometry-controlled bright-channel enhancement, demonstrating that the magnon-photon coupling depends on spatial placement rather than just total magnetic volume. Antinode-compatible placements increase the coupling, while node-compatible placements suppress it. Weak symmetry breaking also transfers finite cavity weight to a mode dark in the symmetric limit, producing an additional branch without destroying the main avoided crossing. Finally, a reduced multimode theory for $J\neq 0$ predicts family-resolved bright and dark channels for odd standing-spin-wave modes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11690 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Double magnetic film in a planar electromagnetic cavity. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Validation of the bilayer scattering theory against the single-film [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Normalized transmission spectra of the symmetric bilayer for rep [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Full-scattering J = 0 spectra of the bilayer cavity in the symmet￾ric and asymmetric cases. (a) Symmetric bilayer transmission map, showing the dominant bright avoided crossing. (b) Asymmetric bilayer transmission map for a finite field imbalance δB, where an additiona…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of the standing-spin-wave spectra between the single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Normalized transmission spectra of the asymmetric bilayer planar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Representative resonance-field line cuts of the asymmetric bilayer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    S. O. Demokritov, V . E. Demidov, O. Dzyapko, G. A. Melkov, A. A. Serga, B. Hillebrands, A. N. Slavin, Bose-Einstein condensation of quasi- equilibrium magnons at room temperature under pumping, Nature 443 (2006) 430–433.doi:10.1038/nature05117

    work page doi:10.1038/nature05117 2006

  2. [2]

    Realization of spin-wave logic gates,

    T. Schneider, A. A. Serga, B. Leven, B. Hillebrands, R. L. Stamps, M. P. Kostylev, Realization of spin-wave logic gates, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 (2008) 022505.doi:10.1063/1.2834714

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2834714 2008

  3. [4]

    A. A. Serga, A. V . Chumak, B. Hillebrands, YIG magnonics, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43 (2010) 264002.doi:10.1088/0022-3727/43/26/ 264002

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3727/43/26/ 2010

  4. [5]

    B. Lenk, H. Ulrichs, F. Garbs, M. M ¨unzenberg, The building blocks of magnonics, Phys. Rep. 507 (2011) 107–136.doi:10.1016/j. physrep.2011.06.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2011

  5. [6]

    Kajiwara, K

    Y . Kajiwara, K. Harii, S. Takahashi, J. Ohe, K. Uchida, M. Mizuguchi, H. Umezawa, H. Kawai, K. Ando, K. Takanashi, S. Maekawa, E. Saitoh, Transmission of electrical signals by spin-wave interconversion in a magnetic insulator, Nature 464 (2010) 262–266.doi:10.1038/ nature08876

    work page 2010

  6. [7]

    A. V . Chumak, A. A. Serga, T. Schneider, B. Hillebrands, M. P. Kostylev, R. L. Stamps, A. Khitun, A magnon transistor for all-magnon data pro- cessing, Nat. Commun. 5 (2014) 4700.doi:10.1038/ncomms5700

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms5700 2014

  7. [8]

    A. V . Chumak, V . I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, B. Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics, Nat. Phys. 11 (2015) 453–461.doi:10.1038/nphys3347

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3347 2015

  8. [9]

    L. J. Cornelissen, J. Liu, R. A. Duine, J. Ben Youssef, B. J. van Wees, Long-distance transport of magnon spin information in a magnetic in- sulator at room temperature, Nat. Phys. 11 (2015) 1022–1026.doi: 10.1038/nphys3465

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3465 2015

Show all 43 references
  1. [10]

    A. V . Chumak, A. A. Serga, B. Hillebrands, Magnonic crystals for data processing, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50 (2017) 244001.doi:10.1088/ 1361-6463/aa6a65

    2017

  2. [11]

    Krawczyk, D

    M. Krawczyk, D. Grundler, Review and prospects of magnonic crystals and devices with reprogrammable band structure, J. Phys.: Condens. Mat- ter 26 (2014) 123202.doi:10.1088/0953-8984/26/12/123202

    2014 doi

  3. [12]

    Barman, G

    A. Barman, G. Gubbiotti, S. Ladak, A. O. Adeyeye, M. Krawczyk, P. Gr ¨unberg, B. Hillebrands, et al., The 2021 magnonics roadmap, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 33 (2021) 413001.doi:10.1088/1361-648X/ abec1a

    2021 doi

  4. [13]

    Flebus, D

    B. Flebus, D. Grundler, B. Rana, Y . Otani, I. Barsukov, A. Barman, G. Gubbiotti, et al., The 2024 magnonics roadmap, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 36 (2024) 363501.doi:10.1088/1361-648X/ad399c

    2024 doi

  5. [14]

    ¨O. O. Soykal, M. E. Flatt ´e, Strong field interactions between a nano- magnet and a photonic cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 077202. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.077202

    2010 doi

  6. [15]

    Huebl, C

    H. Huebl, C. W. Zollitsch, J. Lotze, F. Hocke, M. Greifenstein, A. Marx, R. Gross, S. T. B. Goennenwein, High cooperativity in coupled mi- crowave resonator ferrimagnetic insulator hybrids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 127003.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.127003

    2013 doi

  7. [16]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y . Tabuchi, S. Ishino, T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, K. Usami, Y . Naka- mura, Hybridizing ferromagnetic magnons and microwave photons in the quantum limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 083603.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.113.083603

    2014

  8. [17]

    Zhang, C.-L

    X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, L. Jiang, H. X. Tang, Strongly coupled magnons and cavity microwave photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 156401.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.156401

    2014 doi

  9. [18]

    Goryachev, W

    M. Goryachev, W. G. Farr, D. L. Creedon, Y . Fan, M. Kostylev, M. E. Tobar, High-cooperativity cavity QED with magnons at mi- crowave frequencies, Phys. Rev. Appl. 2 (2014) 054002.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevApplied.2.054002

    2014

  10. [19]

    L. Bai, M. Harder, Y . P. Chen, X. Fan, J. Q. Xiao, C.-M. Hu, Spin pump- ing in electrodynamically coupled magnon-photon systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 227201.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.227201

    2015 doi

  11. [20]

    Tabuchi, T

    Y . Tabuchi, T. Ishikawa, T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, K. Usami, Y . Naka- mura, Coherent coupling between a ferromagnetic magnon and a su- perconducting qubit, Science 349 (2015) 405–408.doi:10.1126/ science.aaa3693

    2015

  12. [21]

    Lachance-Quirion, Y

    D. Lachance-Quirion, Y . Tabuchi, A. Gloppe, K. Usami, Y . Nakamura, 14 Hybrid quantum systems based on magnonics, Appl. Phys. Express 12 (2019) 070101.doi:10.7567/1882-0786/ab2103

    2019 doi

  13. [22]

    Zare Rameshti, S

    B. Zare Rameshti, S. Viola Kusminskiy, J. A. Haigh, K. Usami, D. Lachance-Quirion, Y . Nakamura, C.-M. Hu, H. X. Tang, G. E. W. Bauer, Y . M. Blanter, Cavity magnonics, Phys. Rep. 979 (2022) 1–61. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.06.001

    2022 doi

  14. [23]

    H. Y . Yuan, Y . Cao, A. Kamra, R. A. Duine, P. Yan, Quantum magnonics: when magnon spintronics meets quantum information science, Phys. Rep. 965 (2022) 1–74.doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.03.002

    2022 doi

  15. [24]

    D. D. Awschalom, C. R. Du, R. He, F. J. Heremans, A. Hoffmann, J. Hou, H. Kurebayashi, Y . Li, L. Liu, V . Novosad, J. Sklenar, S. E. Sullivan, D. Sun, H. Tang, V . Tyberkevych, C. Trevillian, A. W. Tsen, L. R. Weiss, W. Zhang, X. Zhang, L. Zhao, C. W. Zollitsch, Quantum engin...

    2021 doi

  16. [25]

    Harder, Y

    M. Harder, Y . Yang, B. M. Yao, C. H. Yu, J. W. Rao, Y . S. Gui, R. L. Stamps, C.-M. Hu, Level attraction due to dissipative magnon- photon coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 137203.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.121.137203

    2018

  17. [26]

    Y .-P. Wang, J. W. Rao, Y . Yang, P.-C. Xu, Y . S. Gui, B. M. Yao, J. Q. You, C.-M. Hu, Nonreciprocity and unidirectional invisibility in cav- ity magnonics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 127202.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.123.127202

    2019

  18. [27]

    J. W. Rao, P. C. Xu, Y . S. Gui, Y . P. Wang, Y . Yang, B. M. Yao, J. Dietrich, G. E. Bridges, X. L. Fan, D. S. Xue, C.-M. Hu, Interferometric control of magnon-induced nearly perfect absorption in cavity magnonics, Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 1933.doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22171-7

    2021 doi

  19. [28]

    J. M. Lee, M.-J. Hwang, H.-W. Lee, Topological magnon-photon in- teraction for cavity magnonics, Commun. Phys. 6 (2023) 194.doi: 10.1038/s42005-023-01316-8

    2023 doi

  20. [29]

    Mart ´ınez-Losa del Rinc ´on, I

    S. Mart ´ınez-Losa del Rinc ´on, I. Gimeno, J. P ´erez-Bail´on, V . Rollano, F. Luis, D. Zueco, M. J. Mart ´ınez-P´erez, Measuring the magnon-photon coupling in shaped ferromagnets: tuning of the resonance frequency, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19 (2023) 014002.doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied...

    2023 doi

  21. [30]

    Y . Cao, P. Yan, H. Huebl, S. T. B. Goennenwein, G. E. W. Bauer, Ex- change magnon-polaritons in microwave cavities, Phys. Rev. B 91 (2015) 094423.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.91.094423

    2015 doi

  22. [31]

    Zhang, C.-L

    X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, N. Zhu, F. Marquardt, L. Jiang, H. X. Tang, Magnon dark modes and gradient memory, Nat. Commun. 6 (2015) 8914.doi: 10.1038/ncomms9914

    2015 doi

  23. [32]

    V . L. Grigoryan, K. Xia, Cavity-mediated dissipative spin-spin cou- pling, Phys. Rev. B 100 (2019) 014415.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.100. 014415

    2019 doi

  24. [33]

    H. Pan, J. Qian, Z. Rao, C.-M. Hu, Z. H. An, Spin pumping of magnons coherently coupled to a cavity dark mode, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19 (2023) 014075.doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.014075

    2023 doi

  25. [34]

    X. Zhan, Y . Zhang, X. Yan, Y . Xiao, Bright and dark modes of exchange- coupled ferromagnetic bilayers in a microwave cavity, J. Appl. Phys. 130 (2021) 123901.doi:10.1063/5.0063510

    2021 doi

  26. [35]

    M. A. Smith, A. L. Lafferty, A. Joseph, M. R. McMaster, J. N. Scott, W. R. Hendren, R. M. Bowman, M. P. Weides, R. Mac ˆedo, Observation of room temperature exchange cavity magnon-polaritons in metallic thin films, Adv. Quantum Technol. 7 (2024) 2300420.doi:10.1002/qute. 202300420

    2024 doi

  27. [36]

    Hoshi, Y

    K. Hoshi, Y . Nozaki, T. Hidano, H. Adachi, S. Maekawa, E. Saitoh, Electric voltage generation by standing spin waves in a cavity magnon- polariton system, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21 (2024) 064057.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevApplied.21.064057

    2024

  28. [37]

    Zhuang, X

    S. Zhuang, X. Zhang, Y . Zhu, N. X. Sun, C.-B. Eom, P. G. Evans, J.- M. Hu, Hybrid magnon-phonon cavity for large-amplitude terahertz spin- wave excitation, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21 (2024) 044009.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevApplied.21.044009

    2024

  29. [38]

    S. A. Nulli, M. S. Ukhtary, R. Saito, Significant enhancement of light absorption in undoped graphene using dielectric multilayer system, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 (2018) 073101.doi:10.1063/1.5012604

    2018 doi

  30. [39]

    Kengo, S

    F. Kengo, S. Solihin, M. S. Ukhtary, J. Suwardy, M. A. Majidi, A. R. T. Nugraha, Tunable optical absorption in undoped graphene sandwiched between multilayer dielectric stacks with mirror symmetry, Phys. Scr. 99 (2024) 035513.doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ad23b1

    2024 doi

  31. [40]

    D. F. Walls, G. J. Milburn, Quantum Optics, Springer, 2008.doi:10. 1007/978-3-540-28574-8

    2008

  32. [41]

    Tavis, F

    M. Tavis, F. W. Cummings, Exact solution for an N-molecule—radiation- field hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. 170 (1968) 379.doi:10.1103/PhysRev. 170.379

    1968 doi

  33. [42]

    Harder, C.-M

    M. Harder, C.-M. Hu, Cavity spintronics: An early review of recent progress in the study of magnon–photon level repulsion, Solid State Phys. 69 (2018) 47–121.doi:10.1016/bs.ssp.2018.08.001

    2018 doi

  34. [43]

    Sadhana, R

    K. Sadhana, R. Shinde, S. Murthy, Synthesis of nanocrystalline YIG using microwave-hydrothermal method, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 23 (2009) 3637– 3642.doi:10.1142/S0217979209063109

    2009 doi

  35. [44]

    S. A. Manuilov, S. Khartsev, A. M. Grishin, Pulsed laser deposited Y3Fe5O12 films: Nature of magnetic anisotropy I, J. Appl. Phys. 106 (2009) 123917.doi:10.1063/1.3272731. 15

    2009 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed May 21, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.