pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.11997 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Raman response in superconducting multiorbital systems with application to nickelates

Mat\'ias Bejas , Jun Zhan , Xianxin Wu , Andreas P. Schnyder , Andr\'es Greco This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 14:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords nickelatesRaman scatteringmultiorbital superconductivitypairing symmetrytwo-orbital modelbilayer modelelectronic Raman response
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Raman response calculations for multiorbital nickelate models yield pairing symmetry fingerprints.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper calculates the Raman response in the superconducting phase for nickelate systems using three models: two-orbital models involving d_x2-y2 and d_z2 orbitals in single and bilayer configurations, and a bilayer model restricted to the d_x2-y2 orbital. Different pairing symmetries are considered for each model to identify their unique signatures in the Raman spectra. Full multiorbital computations that account for interorbital and intraorbital scattering are performed and contrasted with additive approximations treating bands separately. The findings are intended to aid in determining the minimal model and pairing symmetry for nickelate superconductivity. Sympathetic readers would care as this helps clarify the mechanism of high-temperature superconductivity in these materials.

Core claim

The Raman response in superconducting multiorbital nickelates exhibits characteristic features that depend on the specific model (one-layer or two-layer two-orbital, or bilayer d_x2-y2) and the pairing symmetry, with full multiorbital calculations revealing differences from the additive band response due to interorbital contributions.

What carries the argument

Multiorbital Raman vertex in the superconducting state, including intra- and inter-orbital scattering channels for the d_x2-y2 and d_z2 orbitals.

If this is right

  • Distinct Raman peaks and thresholds appear for s-wave, d-wave, and other pairing symmetries.
  • Interlayer coupling in two-layer models modifies the Raman response compared to single-layer.
  • The two-orbital models produce additional interorbital scattering contributions not present in the single-orbital bilayer model.
  • Comparison with experiment can help select the appropriate minimal model for nickelates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This Raman formalism can be extended to other multiorbital high-Tc candidates like infinite-layer nickelates or cuprates.
  • Polarization-dependent Raman measurements could be used to map the gap anisotropy in these systems.
  • The results suggest that neglecting multiorbital effects may lead to incorrect pairing symmetry assignments.

Load-bearing premise

The selected two-orbital and bilayer models with the assumed pairing symmetries represent the essential low-energy physics of nickelate superconductors.

What would settle it

Measuring the Raman response in a superconducting nickelate sample and finding no match to the predicted spectral features for any considered model or pairing symmetry would falsify the applicability of these models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11997 by Andreas P. Schnyder, Andr\'es Greco, Jun Zhan, Mat\'ias Bejas, Xianxin Wu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Energy bands in the single-layer two-orbital [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (e)] and B1g [solid green line in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Energy bands in the bilayer two-orbital model. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Solid lines are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Solid lines are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The recent discovery of high-$T_c$ superconductivity in pressurized and thin film nickelates is nowadays one of the most relevant and active topics in solid-state physics. The origin of superconductivity together with the relevance of multiorbital physics are highly discussed issues in this field. Knowledge of the size of the gap and its symmetry is of fundamental interest to uncover the superconducting mechanism at play in the nickelates. Electronic Raman scattering is a powerful tool to investigate the main characteristics of the gap. Here, we investigate the Raman response in the superconducting phase for three different models: Two-orbital models, including $d_{x^2-y^2}$ and $d_{z^2}$ orbitals, with one and two layers; as well as a bilayer model with the $d_{x^2-y^2}$ orbital as the only active one. For each of these models, we consider different pairing symmetries and determine their characteristic fingerprints in the Raman response. For the two-orbital models, we perform full multiorbital calculations including interorbital and intraorbital scattering, and compare the results with those obtained using the additive Raman response where each band is considered separately. Our results should be useful for discussing the minimal model for superconductivity and its pairing symmetry in nickelates. The obtained results and discussions, as well as the presented formalism, are also of general interest for other multiorbital systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes the electronic Raman response in the superconducting state for three models relevant to nickelate superconductors: two-orbital (d_{x^2-y^2} and d_{z^2}) models for both monolayer and bilayer geometries, and a bilayer model restricted to the d_{x^2-y^2} orbital. For each model it examines multiple pairing symmetries, evaluates the full multiorbital Raman susceptibility (including inter- and intra-orbital channels) against an additive approximation that treats bands independently, and extracts characteristic spectral features such as gap-node signatures and orbital-selective contributions. The results are positioned as reference calculations to help constrain the minimal model and pairing symmetry in nickelates.

Significance. If the derivations and numerical implementations are correct, the work supplies a useful set of theoretical Raman fingerprints across models and symmetries that can guide interpretation of future experiments on nickelates. The explicit comparison of full multiorbital versus additive responses quantifies the role of interorbital scattering, while the coverage of one- and two-layer cases maps how dimensionality and orbital content affect observable spectra. The formalism is presented in a manner that is transferable to other multiorbital superconductors. Credit is due for performing these reference calculations without claiming quantitative reproduction of any specific experiment.

minor comments (3)
  1. [§2] §2 (model Hamiltonians): the explicit form of the Raman vertex operator for the multiorbital case is not written out; adding the matrix elements in the orbital basis would clarify how interorbital contributions enter the susceptibility.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions (throughout): the gap magnitude, temperature, and broadening parameter used in each panel are not stated; these should be listed explicitly so that the plotted spectra can be reproduced.
  3. [§4] §4 (discussion): the claim that the results 'should be useful for discussing the minimal model' would be strengthened by a short table that tabulates the most distinctive Raman features (e.g., presence/absence of a 2Δ peak, low-frequency power law) for each model-symmetry combination.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our manuscript, the recognition of its utility as reference calculations for Raman fingerprints in nickelate models, and the recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper performs direct numerical computations of Raman response functions starting from standard model Hamiltonians (two-orbital and bilayer models) and assumed pairing symmetries. These calculations are presented as reference results for discussion of nickelate superconductivity, without any parameter fitting to data, self-referential predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claims to the inputs by construction. The derivation chain remains self-contained as standard many-body response theory applied to chosen models.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on standard BCS-like pairing assumptions and multiorbital tight-binding models whose parameters are not specified in the abstract; no new entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Electrons in the nickelate models form Cooper pairs with a well-defined symmetry (s, d, etc.) that can be inserted into the Raman response kernel.
    Invoked when different pairing symmetries are considered for each model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5567 in / 1197 out tokens · 37569 ms · 2026-05-10T14:56:56.611799+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    k is the momentum in the two-dimensional (2D) lattice, where on each site the x and z orbitals are located

    txx is the hopping between x orbitals, tzz is the hopping between z orbitals, and txz the hopping between the x and z orbitals (tzx is the complex conju- gated of txz). k is the momentum in the two-dimensional (2D) lattice, where on each site the x and z orbitals are located. The Hamiltonian in the band basis, H B k =U †HkU , is diagonal H B k = [ e1(k) 0...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The first term on the right-hand side of Eq.( 14) is just the free A1g response

    is [γα (k)]2, in χ γ 1,α isγα (k), and in χ 11,α is 1. The first term on the right-hand side of Eq.( 14) is just the free A1g response. It is instructive to make calculations using the IB ap- proximation and compare the results with the obtained ones using the MO approach, because the additive ap- proximation is frequently done and it might be useful for o...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The two fillings give, µ/t = − 1

    05, which is similar to the small interlayer hopping be- tweendx2− y2 orbitals of different planes for bilayer nick- elates [37–40], and of the order of that in infinite-layer nickelates[43]. The two fillings give, µ/t = − 1. 45, which corresponds to quarter filling ( n = 0. 5 per plane) for the dx2− y2 orbitals in bilayer nickelates, and µ/t = − 0. 44, which...

    work page

  4. [4]

    cancels exactly the first term (Ref. [7]). For small splitting t⊥/t = 0. 05 we have two quasicircular FS sheets centered at Γ [see inset in Fig. 1(b)] which resembles the spherical FS of the free electron gas. Instead, for t⊥/t = 0. 85 the two FS sheets look further away from the free electron gas [see inset in Fig. 1(f)] and the screening is less efficient ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    As can be seen, interband transitions occur above an onset energy ω/t ∼ 0. 5. In the superconducting state low-energy pair breaking features are expected at low energy below the onset of interband transitions. As we are interested in the low- energy pair breaking features we present results up to ω = 3∆ 0. Next, we present results for the following gaps: ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    In addition, the IB approach predicts a broader low-energy peak for A1g than the MO method

    5∆ 0 is suppressed in the IB approach. In addition, the IB approach predicts a broader low-energy peak for A1g than the MO method. For the interorbital d-wave pairing [Fig. 3(e), 3(f)] the results from both approxima- tions show similar differences, with the γ sheet peak (B and C) strongly suppressed in the IB approximation. For A1g a larger spectral weigh...

    work page

  7. [7]

    1, and ∆ 0/t = 0. 01. V. BILAYER TWO-ORBITAL MODEL The proposed model Hamiltonian is given by a bi- layer formed by the stacked of two single-layer two- orbital models discussed in Sec. IV, and it is written as H0 = ∑ k,l ψ † k,lHk,lψ k,l + ∑ kH ⊥ k . In H0 the index l takes the values 1 and 2 corresponding to the two layers. Hk,l has the same form as Eq. (

    work page

  8. [8]

    H ⊥ k = t⊥ (z† k, 1zk, 2 + H

    for each layer, and ψ † k,l = (x† k,l,z † k,l ). H ⊥ k = t⊥ (z† k, 1zk, 2 + H. c), where t⊥ is the interlayer hopping between dz2 orbitals, which is well known to be large and even of the order of t[29, 42]. Thus, this model is just a simple and natural extension of the model of Sec. IV to two layers coupled with the larger interlayer hopping between dz2 ...

    work page

  9. [9]

    T. P. Devereaux and R. Hackl, Inelastic light scattering from correlated electrons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 175 (2007)

    work page 2007

  10. [10]

    Keimer, S

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, From quantum matter to high- temperature superconductivity in copper oxides, Nature 518, 179 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    Timusk and B

    T. Timusk and B. Statt, The pseudogap in high- temperature superconductors: an experimental survey, Reports on Progress in Physics 62, 61 (1999)

    work page 1999

  12. [12]

    A. P. Schnyder, C. Mudry, and D. Manske, Screening in ( d + s)-wave superconductors: Application to raman scattering, Phys. Rev. B 75, 174525 (2007)

    work page 2007

  13. [13]

    T. P. Devereaux, A. Virosztek, and A. Zawadowski, Multiband electronic raman scattering in bilayer super- conductors, Phys. Rev. B 54, 12523 (1996)

    work page 1996

  14. [14]

    G. R. Boyd, T. P. Devereaux, P. J. Hirschfeld, V. Mishra, and D. J. Scalapino, Probing the pairing symmetry of the iron pnictides with electronic raman scattering, Phys. Rev. B 79, 174521 (2009) . 10

    work page 2009

  15. [15]

    Sauer and G

    C. Sauer and G. Blumberg, Screening of the raman re- sponse in multiband superconductors: Application to iron pnictides, Phys. Rev. B 82, 014525 (2010)

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    D. Li, K. Lee, B. Y. Wang, M. Osada, S. Cross- ley, H. R. Lee, Y. Cui, Y. Hikita, and H. Y. Hwang, Superconductivity in an infinite-layer nickelate, Nature 572, 624 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Osada, B

    M. Osada, B. Y. Wang, K. Lee, D. Li, and H. Y. Hwang, Phase diagram of infinite layer praseodymium nickelate Pr 1− xSrxNiO2 thin films, Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 121801 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    G. A. Pan, D. Ferenc Segedin, H. LaBollita, Q. Song, E. M. Nica, B. H. Goodge, A. T. Pierce, S. Doyle, S. Novakov, D. C´ ordova Carrizales, A. T. N’Diaye, P. Shafer, H. Paik, J. T. Heron, J. A. Mason, A. Yacoby, L. F. Kourkoutis, O. Erten, C. M. Brooks, A. S. Botana, and J. A. Mundy, Supercon- ductivity in a quintuple-layer square-planar nickelate, Nature...

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    N. N. Wang, M. W. Yang, Z. Yang, K. Y. Chen, H. Zhang, Q. H. Zhang, Z. H. Zhu, Y. Uwatoko, L. Gu, X. L. Dong, J. P. Sun, K. J. Jin, and J.-G. Cheng, Pressure-induced monotonic enhancement of Tc to over 30 K in superconducting Pr0.82Sr0.18NiO2 thin films, Nature Communications 13, 4367 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    X. Ding, C. C. Tam, X. Sui, Y. Zhao, M. Xu, J. Choi, H. Leng, J. Zhang, M. Wu, H. Xiao, X. Zu, M. Garcia- Fernandez, S. Agrestini, X. Wu, Q. Wang, P. Gao, S. Li, B. Huang, K.-J. Zhou, and L. Qiao, Critical role of hydrogen for superconductivity in nickelates, Nature 615, 50 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Sakakibara, H

    H. Sakakibara, H. Usui, K. Suzuki, T. Kotani, H. Aoki, and K. Kuroki, Model Construction and a Possibility of Cupratelike Pairing in a New d9 Nickelate Superconduc- tor (Nd , Sr)NiO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 077003 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    X. Wu, D. Di Sante, T. Schwemmer, W. Hanke, H. Y. Hwang, S. Raghu, and R. Thomale, Robust dx2− y2-wave superconductivity of infinite-layer nicke- lates, Phys. Rev. B 101, 060504(R) (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Zhang, Y.-f

    G.-M. Zhang, Y.-f. Yang, and F.-C. Zhang, Self-doped mott insulator for parent compounds of nickelate super- conductors, Phys. Rev. B 101, 020501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    P. Worm, Q. Wang, M. Kitatani, I. Bia/suppress lo, Q. Gao, X. Ren, J. Choi, D. Csontosov´ a, K.-J. Zhou, X. Zhou, Z. Zhu, L. Si, J. Chang, J. M. Tomczak, and K. Held, Spin fluctuations sufficient to mediate superconductivity in nickelates, Phys. Rev. B 109, 235126 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Q. Gu, Y. Li, S. Wan, H. Li, W. Guo, H. Yang, Q. Li, X. Zhu, X. Pan, Y. Nie, and H.-H. Wen, Single particle tunneling spectrum of superconducting Nd1-xSrxNiO2 thin films, Nature Communications 11, 6027 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    S. P. Harvey, B. Y. Wang, J. Fowlie, M. Osada, K. Lee, Y. Lee, D. Li, and H. Y. Hwang, Evidence for nodal superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelates, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122, e2427243122 (2025) , https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2427243122

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2427243122 2025

  27. [27]

    L. E. Chow, S. K. Sudheesh, Z. Y. Luo, P. Nandi, T. Heil, J. Deuschle, S. W. Zeng, Z. T. Zhang, S. Prakash, X. M. Du, Z. S. Lim, P. A. van Aken, E. E. M. Chia, and A. Ariando, Pairing symmetry in infinite-layer nickelate superconduct or (2023), arXiv:2201.10038 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Grissonnanche, G

    G. Grissonnanche, G. A. Pan, H. LaBollita, D. F. Segedin, Q. Song, H. Paik, C. M. Brooks, E. Beauchesne- Blanchet, J. L. Santana Gonz´ alez, A. S. Botana, J. A. Mundy, and B. J. Ramshaw, Electronic band structure of a superconducting nickelate probed by the seebeck coefficient in the disordered limit, Phys. Rev. X 14, 041021 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Cheng, D

    B. Cheng, D. Cheng, K. Lee, L. Luo, Z. Chen, Y. Lee, B. Y. Wang, M. Mootz, I. E. Perakis, Z.-X. Shen, H. Y. Hwang, and J. Wang, Evidence for d-wave superconduc- tivity of infinite-layer nickelates from low-energy electr o- dynamics, Nature Materials 23, 775 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Hu, J. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Han, L. Tang, Z. Mao, P. Yang, B. Wang, J. Cheng, D.-X. Yao, G.- M. Zhang, and M. Wang, Signatures of superconduc- tivity near 80 K in a nickelate under high pressure, Nature 621, 493 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Hou, P.-T

    J. Hou, P.-T. Yang, Z.-Y. Liu, J.-Y. Li, P.-F. Shan, L. Ma, G. Wang, N.-N. Wang, H.-Z. Guo, J.-P. Sun, Y. Uwatoko, M. Wang, G.-M. Zhang, B.-S. Wang, and J.-G. Cheng, Emergence of High-Temperature Super- conducting Phase in Pressurized La3Ni2O7 Crystals, Chinese Physics Letters 40, 117302 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    E. K. Ko, Y. Yu, Y. Liu, L. Bhatt, J. Li, V. Thampy, C.-T. Kuo, B. Y. Wang, Y. Lee, K. Lee, J.-S. Lee, B. H. Goodge, D. A. Muller, and H. Y. Hwang, Signa- tures of ambient pressure superconductivity in thin film La3Ni2O7, Nature 638, 935 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    G. Zhou, W. Lv, H. Wang, Z. Nie, Y. Chen, Y. Li, H. Huang, W.-Q. Chen, Y.-J. Sun, Q.- K. Xue, and Z. Chen, Ambient-pressure supercon- ductivity onset above 40 K in (La,Pr)3Ni2O7 films, Nature 640, 641 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Y. Wang, K. Jiang, J. Ying, T. Wu, J. Cheng, J. Hu, and X. Chen, Recent progress in nickelate superconductors, National Science Review 10.1093/nsr/nwaf373 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1093/nsr/nwaf373 2025

  35. [35]

    J. Guo, Y. Chen, Y. Wang, H. Sun, D. Hu, M. Wang, X. Huang, and T. Cui, Revealing superconducting gap in La3Ni2O7- δ by An- dreev reflection spectroscopy under high pressure, Nature Communications 16, 10838 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Z.-Y. Cao, D. Peng, S. Choi, F. Lan, L. Yu, E. Zhang, Z. Xing, Y. Liu, F. Zhang, T. Luo, L. Chen, V. T. A. Hong, S.-Y. Paek, H. Jang, J. Xie, H. Liu, H. Lou, Z. Zeng, Y. Ding, J. Zhao, C. Liu, T. Park, Q. Zeng, and H. kwang Mao, Direct Observation of d-Wave Superconducting Gap Symmetry in Pressurized (2025), arXiv:2509.12606 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Y. Gu, C. Le, Z. Yang, X. Wu, and J. Hu, Effective model and pairing tendency in the bilayer Ni-based supercon- ductor La 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B 111, 174506 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Structural phase transition, s ±- wave pairing, and magnetic stripe order in bi- layered superconductor La3Ni2O7 under pressure, Nature Communications 15, 2470 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Trends in electronic structures and s± -wave pairing for the rare-earth series in bilayer nickelate supe r- conductor R3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B 108, 165141 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Liu, J.-W

    Y.-B. Liu, J.-W. Mei, F. Ye, W.-Q. Chen, and F. Yang, s± -Wave Pairing and the Destructive Role of Apical-Oxygen Deficiencies in La 3Ni2O7 under Pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 236002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Jiang, Y.-H

    K.-Y. Jiang, Y.-H. Cao, Q.-G. Yang, H.-Y. Lu, and Q.-H. Wang, Theory of Pressure Dependence 11 of Superconductivity in Bilayer Nickelate La 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 076001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Sakakibara, N

    H. Sakakibara, N. Kitamine, M. Ochi, and K. Kuroki, Possible High Tc Superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7 under High Pressure through Manifestation of a Nearly Half-Filled Bilayer Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 106002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    J. Zhan, Y. Gu, X. Wu, and J. Hu, Coopera- tion between Electron-Phonon Coupling and Elec- tronic Interaction in Bilayer Nickelates La 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 136002 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    Shao, Y.-B

    Z.-Y. Shao, Y.-B. Liu, M. Liu, and F. Yang, Band struc- ture and pairing nature of La 3Ni2O7 thin film at ambient pressure, Phys. Rev. B 112, 024506 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    C. Lu, Z. Pan, F. Yang, and C. Wu, Interlayer- Coupling-Driven High-Temperature Super- conductivity in La 3Ni2O7 under Pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 146002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Qu, D.-W

    X.-Z. Qu, D.-W. Qu, J. Chen, C. Wu, F. Yang, W. Li, and G. Su, Bilayer t− J− J ⊥ Model and Magnetically Me- diated Pairing in the Pressurized Nickelate La 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036502 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    H. Oh, B. Zhou, and Y.-H. Zhang, Type-II t− J model in charge transfer regime in bilayer La 3Ni2O7 and trilayer La4Ni3O10, Phys. Rev. B 111, L020504 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Bejas, X

    M. Bejas, X. Wu, D. Chakraborty, A. P. Schnyder, and A. Greco, Out-of-plane bond-order phase, super- conductivity, and their competition in the t- J∥− J⊥ model: Possible implications for bilayer nickelates, Phys. Rev. B 111, 144514 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    T. A. Maier, P. Doak, L.-F. Lin, Y. Zhang, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Interlayer pairing in bilayer nickelates, npj Quantum Materials 10.1038/s41535-026-00849-9 (2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-026-00849-9 2026

  50. [50]

    Z. Luo, X. Hu, M. Wang, W. W´ u, and D.-X. Yao, Bi- layer Two-Orbital Model of La 3Ni2O7 under Pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 126001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    A. S. Botana and M. R. Norman, Similarities and Dif- ferences between LaNiO 2 and CaCuO 2 and Implications for Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011024 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    Bouadim, G

    K. Bouadim, G. G. Batrouni, F. H´ ebert, and R. T. Scalettar, Magnetic and transport properties of a cou- pled hubbard bilayer with electron and hole doping, Phys. Rev. B 77, 144527 (2008)

    work page 2008

  53. [53]

    S. S. Kancharla and S. Okamoto, Band insulator to mott insulator transition in a bilayer hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 75, 193103 (2007)

    work page 2007

  54. [54]

    H. Zhai, F. Wang, and D.-H. Lee, Antiferromagneti- cally driven electronic correlations in iron pnictides and cuprates, Phys. Rev. B 80, 064517 (2009)

    work page 2009

  55. [55]

    T. A. Maier and D. J. Scalapino, Pair structure and the pairing interaction in a bilayer hub- bard model for unconventional superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 84, 180513 (2011)

    work page 2011

  56. [56]

    Suthar, V

    A. Suthar, V. Sundaramurthy, M. Bejas, C. Le, P. Puphal, P. Sosa-Lizama, A. Schulz, J. Nuss, M. Isobe, P. A. van Aken, Y. E. Suyolcu, M. Minola, A. P. Schnyder, X. Wu, B. Keimer, G. Khaliullin, A. Greco, and M. Hepting, Multiorbital character of the density wave instability in L a4Ni3O10 (2025), arXiv:2508.06440 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, S. Okamoto, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, General trends of superconducting pair- ing and magnetic correlations in the Ruddlesden-Popper nickelate m-layered superconductors La m+1NimO3m+1, Phys. Rev. B 112, 094517 (2025)

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    J. Zhan, C. Le, X. Wu, and J. Hu, Impact of nonlocal coulomb repulsion on superconductivity and densit (2025), arXiv:2503.18877 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    J. Zhan, M. Bejas, A. P. Schnyder, A. Greco, X. Wu, and J. Hu, Detecting pairing symmetry of bilayer nickelates using electronic raman scattering, Chin. Phys. Lett. 43, 020706 (2026)

    work page 2026

  60. [60]

    M.-J. Kim, S. Kovalev, M. Udina, R. Haenel, G. Kim, M. Puviani, G. Cristiani, I. Ilyakov, T. V. A. G. de Oliveira, A. Ponomaryov, J.-C. Deinert, G. Logvenov, B. Keimer, D. Manske, L. Benfatto, and S. Kaiser, Tracing the dynamics of supercon- ducting order via transient terahertz third-harmonic generation, Science Advances 10, eadi7598 (2024) , https://www...

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adi7598 2024

  61. [61]

    K. Kaj, K. A. Cremin, I. Hammock, J. Schalch, D. N. Basov, and R. D. Averitt, Terahertz third harmonic generation in c-axis La 1.85Sr0.15CuO4, Phys. Rev. B 107, L140504 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    Fiore, M

    J. Fiore, M. Udina, M. Marciani, G. Seibold, and L. Ben- fatto, Contribution of collective excitations to third har - monic generation in two-band superconductors: The case of MgB 2, Phys. Rev. B 106, 094515 (2022)

    work page 2022