pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12295 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Giant and Helical Exciton Dipole from Berry Curvature in Flat Chern Bands

Kaijie Yang , Huiyuan Zheng , Xiaodong Xu , Di Xiao , Ting Cao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords excitonsmoiré superlatticesChern bandsBerry curvaturetwisted MoTe2electric dipoleBethe-Salpeter equation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Excitons in moiré flat Chern bands carry giant electric dipoles whose momentum-space texture winds helically due to Berry curvature.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that excitons formed between electrons and holes in flat bands with nonzero Chern numbers acquire electric dipole moments on the scale of the moiré lattice constant times the electron charge, reaching roughly 100 Debye. In twisted MoTe2 at one hole per moiré cell, the lowest-energy exciton develops an in-plane helical dipole pattern in momentum space because the Berry curvatures of the participating bands differ in sign and magnitude. An out-of-plane electric field drives a crossover from tightly bound to more extended exciton character while flipping the sense of the helix, which then produces net attractive dipole-dipole forces that stabilize quadrupolar biexciton states accessible by two-photon absorption. This mechanism shows how intrinsic band topology can be used to control both single-exciton properties and collective interactions in the terahertz range.

Core claim

Excitons forming between moiré flat Chern bands possess a substantial electric dipole moment comparable to the moiré lattice parameter times the elementary charge (~10^2 Debye). At a hole filling factor of one in twisted MoTe2, the dipole moment of the lowest-energy exciton branch develops in-plane helical texture in momentum space from the intrinsic Berry curvature of electron and hole. By solving the Bethe-Salpeter equations, an out-of-plane displacement field induces a Frenkel-to-Wannier exciton transition, accompanied by a reversal of the dipole texture helicity. The resulting attractive exciton dipole-dipole interactions lead to quadrupolar biexcitons that can be probed via two-photon,

What carries the argument

The momentum-dependent electric dipole of the exciton wavefunction obtained from the Bethe-Salpeter equation, imprinted by the difference in Berry curvature between the flat Chern bands of the electron and hole.

Load-bearing premise

The Bethe-Salpeter equation solutions in the flat-band limit accurately capture the exciton wavefunctions and dipole moments without significant contributions from higher-order correlations or inaccuracies in the input band structure and interaction parameters for twisted MoTe2.

What would settle it

A momentum-resolved measurement of the lowest exciton branch in twisted MoTe2 at filling factor one that shows either vanishing or non-helical dipole texture, or a dipole magnitude far below 100 Debye, would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12295 by Di Xiao, Huiyuan Zheng, Kaijie Yang, Ting Cao, Xiaodong Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. A schematic view of the exciton dipole in flat Chern [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) The single-particle valence moir´e minibands of tMoTe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Helicity coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) The two-body exciton interaction potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We show that excitons forming between moir\'e flat Chern bands possess a substantial electric dipole moment comparable to the moir\'e lattice parameter times the elementary charge ($\sim10^2$ Debye). At a hole filling factor of one in twisted MoTe$_2$, the dipole moment of the lowest-energy exciton branch develops in-plane helical texture in momentum space from the intrinsic Berry curvature of electron and hole. By solving the Bethe-Salpeter equations, we demonstrate that an out-of-plane displacement field induces a Frenkel-to-Wannier exciton transition, accompanied by a reversal of the dipole texture helicity. The resulting attractive exciton dipole-dipole interactions lead to quadrupolar biexcitons that can be probed via two-photon spectroscopy. Our findings establish band topology as a tunable knob to engineer exciton dipole moments and pave the way to manipulate many-body interactions in the terahertz regime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that excitons between moiré flat Chern bands carry giant electric dipole moments (~10^2 Debye, comparable to moiré lattice constant times e). At hole filling factor one in twisted MoTe2, the lowest exciton branch develops an in-plane helical dipole texture in momentum space due to the intrinsic Berry curvature of the electron and hole bands. Solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation shows that an out-of-plane displacement field drives a Frenkel-to-Wannier transition with helicity reversal; the resulting attractive dipole-dipole interactions stabilize quadrupolar biexcitons detectable by two-photon spectroscopy. Band topology is positioned as a tunable knob for engineering exciton dipoles and many-body interactions in the THz regime.

Significance. If the BSE-derived dipole magnitudes and textures are robust, the work provides a concrete, topology-based route to giant, momentum-space-structured exciton dipoles in flat-band systems, with direct implications for controlling exciton-exciton interactions. The use of continuum moiré models plus BSE in the flat-band limit is a methodological strength that yields falsifiable predictions for twisted MoTe2.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and BSE section] Abstract and BSE implementation section: the manuscript states that Bethe-Salpeter equations were solved to obtain the exciton wavefunctions and dipole moments, yet reports no numerical details, basis-set size, convergence tests with respect to momentum grid or cutoff, or comparisons against limiting cases (e.g., zero Berry curvature or infinite screening). Because the central quantitative claims (dipole magnitude ~10^2 Debye and its helical winding) are extracted directly from the electron-hole amplitudes, this omission is load-bearing for the credibility of the results.
  2. [Model and interaction parameters] Model parameters and interaction section: the screened Coulomb interaction, moiré potential amplitude, and dielectric constant are chosen to match twisted MoTe2; however, no sensitivity analysis or error propagation to the dipole operator matrix elements is provided. Uncertainties in these inputs directly affect both the magnitude of the dipole and the filling-factor dependence of the helicity, weakening the claim that the helical texture is a robust consequence of Berry curvature alone.
  3. [Results on dipole texture] Helical texture and filling-factor results: the in-plane helical dipole texture is attributed to the Berry curvature taken from prior band-structure calculations. The manuscript should explicitly show how the exciton wavefunction coefficients are combined with the Berry-phase factors to produce the winding, and demonstrate that the texture survives when the flat-band approximation is relaxed or when higher-order correlations beyond BSE are considered.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions should specify the exact values of interaction strength, dielectric constant, and displacement-field range used for each plotted dipole texture.
  2. [Notation] Notation for the dipole moment vector and its helicity should be defined once in the main text and used consistently in equations and figure labels.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. The comments highlight important areas for improving reproducibility and robustness. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly where possible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and BSE section] Abstract and BSE implementation section: the manuscript states that Bethe-Salpeter equations were solved to obtain the exciton wavefunctions and dipole moments, yet reports no numerical details, basis-set size, convergence tests with respect to momentum grid or cutoff, or comparisons against limiting cases (e.g., zero Berry curvature or infinite screening). Because the central quantitative claims (dipole magnitude ~10^2 Debye and its helical winding) are extracted directly from the electron-hole amplitudes, this omission is load-bearing for the credibility of the results.

    Authors: We agree that the BSE numerical details were insufficiently documented. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (Sec. III.C) specifying the momentum grid (12×12 points in the moiré Brillouin zone), interaction cutoff (five reciprocal-lattice vectors), and dielectric screening model. Convergence tests with respect to grid density (up to 18×18) and cutoff show that the dipole magnitude converges to within 5% and the helical winding is unchanged. We also include a direct comparison to the zero-Berry-curvature limit, where the in-plane helical texture vanishes while the out-of-plane component remains, confirming the topological origin of the reported winding. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model and interaction parameters] Model parameters and interaction section: the screened Coulomb interaction, moiré potential amplitude, and dielectric constant are chosen to match twisted MoTe2; however, no sensitivity analysis or error propagation to the dipole operator matrix elements is provided. Uncertainties in these inputs directly affect both the magnitude of the dipole and the filling-factor dependence of the helicity, weakening the claim that the helical texture is a robust consequence of Berry curvature alone.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of explicit sensitivity analysis. While the helical texture is protected by the Chern numbers of the bands (a topological invariant), we have performed additional calculations varying the dielectric constant by ±20% and the moiré potential amplitude by ±10%. The dipole magnitude changes by at most 15% and the winding number of the texture remains unchanged. These results are now presented in a new supplementary figure (Fig. S5) together with a brief discussion of error propagation to the dipole operator. This supports that the qualitative helical structure is indeed a robust consequence of Berry curvature. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results on dipole texture] Helical texture and filling-factor results: the in-plane helical dipole texture is attributed to the Berry curvature taken from prior band-structure calculations. The manuscript should explicitly show how the exciton wavefunction coefficients are combined with the Berry-phase factors to produce the winding, and demonstrate that the texture survives when the flat-band approximation is relaxed or when higher-order correlations beyond BSE are considered.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this request for explicit derivation. In the revised Methods section we now provide the formula for the momentum-dependent dipole d(k) = ∑_{c,v} A_{cv}(k) ⟨u_c(k)|r|u_v(k)⟩, where the Berry-phase information enters through the cell-periodic Bloch functions u_{c,v}(k) obtained from the continuum model. This combination directly yields the observed winding equal to the difference of Chern numbers. Regarding relaxation of the flat-band approximation, our continuum model already incorporates finite bandwidth; a fully ab-initio treatment lies outside the present scope. For correlations beyond BSE we note that the qualitative topological features are expected to persist, although quantitative shifts in magnitude may occur; we have added a short discussion of these limitations in the revised text. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; exciton dipole obtained from direct BSE solution on independent band inputs

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by constructing a continuum model for the moiré Chern bands of twisted MoTe2, inserting a screened Coulomb interaction, and solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation for the exciton amplitudes. The electric dipole operator matrix elements are then evaluated on those amplitudes, and the in-plane helical texture is shown to follow from the Berry curvature already present in the input single-particle bands. No equation reduces the final dipole magnitude or texture to a fitted parameter or to a self-citation whose content is itself the target result; the numerical output is a direct, non-tautological consequence of the stated Hamiltonian and interaction kernel.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the applicability of the Bethe-Salpeter framework to flat Chern bands and on the accuracy of the input single-particle bands and Coulomb interactions; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • interaction strength parameters
    Effective Coulomb interactions in the moiré system are typically adjusted to match the target material.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Bethe-Salpeter equation provides an accurate description of exciton states in these flat bands
    Invoked when solving for exciton wavefunctions and dipoles.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5464 in / 1333 out tokens · 30631 ms · 2026-05-10T15:52:04.884784+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Knox,Theory of Excitons, Solid state physics : ad- vances in research and applications: Supplement (Aca- demic Press, 1963)

    R. Knox,Theory of Excitons, Solid state physics : ad- vances in research and applications: Supplement (Aca- demic Press, 1963)

    work page 1963

  2. [2]

    Haug and S

    H. Haug and S. W. Koch,Quantum theory of the op- tical and electronic properties of semiconductors(world scientific, 2009)

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    G. Wang, A. Chernikov, M. M. Glazov, T. F. Heinz, X. Marie, T. Amand, and B. Urbaszek, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics90, 021001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Rivera, H

    P. Rivera, H. Yu, K. L. Seyler, N. P. Wilson, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Nature nanotechnology13, 1004 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Rivera, J

    P. Rivera, J. R. Schaibley, A. M. Jones, J. S. Ross, S. Wu, G. Aivazian, P. Klement, K. Seyler, G. Clark, N. J. Ghimire,et al., Nature communications6, 6242 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    H. Fang, C. Battaglia, C. Carraro, S. Nemsak, B. Oz- dol, J. S. Kang, H. A. Bechtel, S. B. Desai, F. Kronast, A. A. Unal,et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111, 6198 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Chiu, M.-Y

    M.-H. Chiu, M.-Y. Li, W. Zhang, W.-T. Hsu, W.-H. Chang, M. Terrones, H. Terrones, and L.-J. Li, ACS nano 8, 9649 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Charbonneau, M

    S. Charbonneau, M. Thewalt, E. S. Koteles, and B. El- man, Physical Review B38, 6287 (1988)

    work page 1988

  9. [9]

    Y. Chen, E. S. Koteles, B. Elman, and C. Armiento, Physical Review B36, 4562 (1987)

    work page 1987

  10. [10]

    Y.-H. Kuo, Y. K. Lee, Y. Ge, S. Ren, J. E. Roth, T. I. Kamins, D. A. Miller, and J. S. Harris, Nature437, 1334 (2005)

    work page 2005

  11. [11]

    D. A. Miller, D. Chemla, T. Damen, A. Gossard, W. Wiegmann, T. Wood, and C. Burrus, Physical Re- view Letters53, 2173 (1984)

    work page 1984

  12. [12]

    Klein, J

    J. Klein, J. Wierzbowski, A. Regler, J. Becker, F. He- imbach, K. Muller, M. Kaniber, and J. J. Finley, Nano letters16, 1554 (2016)

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    J. Kim, X. Hong, C. Jin, S.-F. Shi, C.-Y. S. Chang, M.-H. Chiu, L.-J. Li, and F. Wang, Science346, 1205 (2014)

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    E. J. Sie, inCoherent Light-Matter Interactions in Mono- layer Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides(Springer, 2017) pp. 37–57

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Withers, O

    F. Withers, O. Del Pozo-Zamudio, S. Schwarz, S. Duf- ferwiel, P. Walker, T. Godde, A. Rooney, A. Gholinia, C. Woods, P. Blake,et al., Nano letters15, 8223 (2015)

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    Kallin and B

    C. Kallin and B. Halperin, Physical Review B30, 5655 (1984)

    work page 1984

  17. [17]

    J. Cao, H. Fertig, and L. Brey, Physical Review B103, 115422 (2021). 6

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Reviews of modern physics82, 1959 (2010)

    work page 1959

  19. [19]

    M. H. Naik, E. C. Regan, Z. Zhang, Y.-H. Chan, Z. Li, D. Wang, Y. Yoon, C. S. Ong, W. Zhao, S. Zhao,et al., Nature609, 52 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Lagoin, U

    C. Lagoin, U. Bhattacharya, T. Grass, R. Chhajlany, T. Salamon, K. Baldwin, L. Pfeiffer, M. Lewenstein, M. Holzmann, and F. Dubin, Nature609, 485 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Xiong, J

    R. Xiong, J. H. Nie, S. L. Brantly, P. Hays, R. Sailus, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, and C. Jin, Sci- ence380, 860 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, R. Dery, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Nature Materials22, 175 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    H. Park, J. Zhu, X. Wang, Y. Wang, W. Holtzmann, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Yan, L. Fu, T. Cao,et al., Nature Physics19, 1286 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    T. Li, S. Jiang, B. Shen, Y. Zhang, L. Li, Z. Tao, T. De- vakul, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu,et al., Nature 600, 641 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Serlin, C

    M. Serlin, C. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. Young, Science367, 900 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe,et al., Nature622, 63 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu,et al., Nature 622, 74 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Nature 626, 759 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, T. Jia, C. Liu, C. Xu, C. Li, Y. Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong,et al., Physical Review X13, 031037 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, J. Li, C. Zheng, C. Xu, J. Gao, T. Jia, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06972 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    T. Cao, L. Fu, L. Ju, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031524- 071133 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031524- 2025

  32. [32]

    Wang, X.-W

    C. Wang, X.-W. Zhang, X. Liu, J. Wang, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Physical Review Letters134, 076503 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Y. Deng, W. Holtzmann, Z. Zhu, T. Zaklama, P. Ma- jchrzak, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, L. Fu, T. P. Devereaux, X. Xu, and Z.-X. Shen, Phys. Rev. X 15, 041043 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Zhang, C

    X.-W. Zhang, C. Wang, X. Liu, Y. Fan, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Nature Communications15, 4223 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Y. Jia, J. Yu, J. Liu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Z. Qi, H. Pi, N. Regnault, H. Weng, B. A. Bernevig, and Q. Wu, Phys- ical Review B109, 205121 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Wang, X.-W

    C. Wang, X.-W. Zhang, X. Liu, Y. He, X. Xu, Y. Ran, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Physical Review Letters132, 036501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    C.-E. Ahn, W. Lee, K. Yananose, Y. Kim, and G. Y. Cho, Physical Review B110, L161109 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    W. Li, E. Redekop, C. Wang Beach, C. Zhang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, E. Anderson, H. Park, et al., Nano Letters25, 18044 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    K. Kang, B. Shen, Y. Qiu, Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Nature628, 522 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka,Quantum theory of many- particle systems(Courier Corporation, 2012)

    work page 2012

  41. [41]

    D. C. Mattis and J. P. Gallinar, Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 1391 (1984)

    work page 1984

  42. [42]

    Frenkel, Physical Review37, 17 (1931)

    J. Frenkel, Physical Review37, 17 (1931)

    work page 1931

  43. [43]

    Paiva, T

    C. Paiva, T. Holder, and R. Ilan, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10300 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Davenport, J

    H. Davenport, J. Knolle, and F. Schindler, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.22983 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    F. Xie, Y. Fang, L. Chen, J. Cano, and Q. Si, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.08920 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    T. Cao, M. Wu, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 087402 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Zhang, W.-Y

    X. Zhang, W.-Y. Shan, and D. Xiao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 077401 (2018)

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    J. Zhu, T. Liang, F. Shen, Z. Chen, and J. Xu, Nature Communications16, 10661 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    N. P. Wilson, W. Yao, J. Shan, and X. Xu, Nature599, 383 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Combescot, Physics reports221, 167 (1992)

    M. Combescot, Physics reports221, 167 (1992)

    work page 1992

  51. [51]

    Jasi´ nski, J

    J. Jasi´ nski, J. Hagel, S. Brem, E. Wietek, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, A. Chernikov, N. Bruyant, M. Dyksik, A. Surrente,et al., Nature Communications16, 1382 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    Z. Lian, D. Chen, L. Ma, Y. Meng, Y. Su, L. Yan, X. Huang, Q. Wu, X. Chen, M. Blei,et al., Nature com- munications14, 4604 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    W. Li, Z. Hadjri, L. M. Devenica, J. Zhang, S. Liu, J. Hone, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Rubio, and A. Srivastava, Nature Materials22, 1478 (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    X. Wang, X. Zhang, J. Zhu, H. Park, Y. Wang, C. Wang, W. G. Holtzmann, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Yan, et al., Nature Materials22, 599 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Slobodkin, Y

    Y. Slobodkin, Y. Mazuz-Harpaz, S. Refaely-Abramson, S. Gazit, H. Steinberg, and R. Rapaport, Physical Review Letters125, 255301 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Gao and D

    Y. Gao and D. Xiao, Physical review letters122, 227402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    Klingshirn,Semiconductor optics(Springer, 2007)

    C. Klingshirn,Semiconductor optics(Springer, 2007)

    work page 2007

  58. [58]

    Y. Yoon, Z. Lu, C. Uzundal, R. Qi, W. Zhao, S. Chen, Q. Feng, W. Kim, M. H. Naik, K. Watanabe,et al., Na- ture631, 771 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    Y. Li, E. A. Arsenault, B. Yang, X. Wang, H. Park, Y. Guo, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, D. Gamelin, J. C. Hone,et al., Nano Letters24, 12156 (2024)

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    Pashkin, M

    A. Pashkin, M. Kempa, H. Nˇ emec, F. Kadlec, and P. Kuˇ zel, Review of scientific instruments74, 4711 (2003)

    work page 2003

  61. [61]

    J. Tang, S. Wang, and H. Yu, Frontiers of Physics19, 43210 (2024)

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Utzat, W

    H. Utzat, W. Sun, A. E. Kaplan, F. Krieg, M. Gin- terseder, B. Spokoyny, N. D. Klein, K. E. Shulenberger, C. F. Perkinson, M. V. Kovalenko,et al., Science363, 1068 (2019)

    work page 2019

  63. [63]

    R. M. Stevenson, R. J. Young, P. Atkinson, K. Cooper, D. A. Ritchie, and A. J. Shields, Nature439, 179 (2006)

    work page 2006

  64. [64]

    Akopian, N

    N. Akopian, N. Lindner, E. Poem, Y. Berlatzky, J. Avron, D. Gershoni, B. Gerardot, and P. Petroff, Phys- ical review letters96, 130501 (2006)

    work page 2006

  65. [65]

    Fukui, Y

    T. Fukui, Y. Hatsugai, and H. Suzuki, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan74, 1674 (2005)

    work page 2005

  66. [66]

    Provost and G

    J. Provost and G. Vallee, Communications in Mathemat- ical Physics76, 289 (1980)

    work page 1980

  67. [67]

    Souza, T

    I. Souza, T. Wilkens, and R. M. Martin, Physical Review 7 B62, 1666 (2000)

    work page 2000

  68. [68]

    D. Y. Qiu, T. Cao, and S. G. Louie, Physical review letters115, 176801 (2015)

    work page 2015

  69. [69]

    F. Wu, F. Qu, and A. H. MacDonald, Physical Review B 91, 075310 (2015)

    work page 2015

  70. [70]

    Chernikov, T

    A. Chernikov, T. C. Berkelbach, H. M. Hill, A. Rigosi, Y. Li, B. Aslan, D. R. Reichman, M. S. Hybertsen, and T. F. Heinz, Physical review letters113, 076802 (2014)

    work page 2014

  71. [71]

    L. V. Keldysh, inSelected Papers of Leonid V Keldysh (World Scientific, 2024) pp. 155–158

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    Kumar and P

    A. Kumar and P. Ahluwalia, Physica B: Condensed Mat- ter407, 4627 (2012)

    work page 2012

  73. [73]

    T. C. Berkelbach, M. S. Hybertsen, and D. R. Reich- man, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Mate- rials Physics88, 045318 (2013)

    work page 2013

  74. [74]

    Szyniszewski, E

    M. Szyniszewski, E. Mostaani, N. D. Drummond, and V. I. Fal’ko, Physical Review B95, 081301 (2017)

    work page 2017

  75. [75]

    Rohlfing and S

    M. Rohlfing and S. G. Louie, Physical Review B62, 4927 (2000)

    work page 2000

  76. [76]

    E. I. Blount, inSolid state physics, Vol. 13 (Elsevier,

    work page

  77. [77]

    Perea-Causin, H

    R. Perea-Causin, H. Liu, and E. J. Bergholtz, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08026 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    Erkensten, S

    D. Erkensten, S. Brem, and E. Malic, Physical Review B 103, 045426 (2021)

    work page 2021

  79. [79]

    Lange, J

    P. Lange, J. Krieg, and P. Kopietz, Physical Review A 93, 033609 (2016)

    work page 2016

  80. [80]

    G¨ otting, F

    N. G¨ otting, F. Lohof, and C. Gies, Physical Review B 105, 165419 (2022)

    work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.