arxiv: 2604.12421 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 💻 cs.CL

Recognition: unknown

Agentic Insight Generation in VSM Simulations

Micha Selak , Dirk Krechel , Adrian Ulges , Sven Spieckermann , Niklas Stoehr , Andreas Loehr

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL

keywords agentic architecturelarge language modelsvalue stream mappinginsight generationsimulation analysisdata discoverymulti-hop reasoning

0 comments

The pith

A decoupled two-step agentic architecture lets large language models generate accurate insights from value stream map simulations by separating orchestration from analysis.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper addresses the challenge of extracting actionable insights from complex value stream map simulations, where standard large language models fail to detect subtle situational differences between similar data sources. It proposes a decoupled architecture that separates orchestration from data analysis and incorporates progressive data discovery infused with domain expert knowledge. This separation enables the system to intelligently select data sources, perform multi-hop reasoning across data structures, and maintain a slim internal context. Evaluations across multiple state-of-the-art models show the approach reaching up to 86% accuracy while remaining robust over repeated runs. The work matters for practical applications in manufacturing and process simulation, where manual insight extraction is time-consuming and error-prone.

Core claim

By separating orchestration from data analysis in a two-step agentic architecture and using progressive data discovery with domain expert knowledge, large language models can intelligently select data sources, perform multi-hop reasoning across structures, and generate actionable insights from value stream map simulations while keeping internal context slim, achieving up to 86% accuracy with high robustness.

What carries the argument

The decoupled two-step agentic architecture that separates orchestration (for intelligent data source selection and multi-hop reasoning) from data analysis to maintain a slim internal context.

Load-bearing premise

That separating orchestration from data analysis enables intelligent selection of data sources and multi-hop reasoning across data structures while maintaining a slim internal context.

What would settle it

Compare the agentic system's accuracy on VSM simulation cases containing deliberately similar but distinct data sources against a baseline single-prompt large language model; if the agentic accuracy shows no significant improvement over the baseline, the claimed benefit of the decoupled architecture is falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12421 by Adrian Ulges, Andreas Loehr, Dirk Krechel, Micha Selak, Niklas Stoehr, Sven Spieckermann.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Overview of the decoupled agentic architecture, showcasing four steps of the under-supplied [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Extracting actionable insights from complex value stream map simulations can be challenging, time-consuming, and error-prone. Recent advances in large language models offer new avenues to support users with this task. While existing approaches excel at processing raw data to gain information, they are structurally unfit to pick up on subtle situational differences needed to distinguish similar data sources in this domain. To address this issue, we propose a decoupled, two-step agentic architecture. By separating orchestration from data analysis, the system leverages progressive data discovery infused with domain expert knowledge. This architecture allows the orchestration to intelligently select data sources and perform multi-hop reasoning across data structures while maintaining a slim internal context. Results from multiple state-of-the-art large language models demonstrate the framework's viability: with top-tier models achieving accuracies of up to 86% and demonstrating high robustness across evaluation runs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper describes a decoupled two-step agentic setup for pulling insights from value stream map simulations and claims up to 86% accuracy, but the abstract supplies no baselines or metric details to support that number.

read the letter

The main takeaway is a practical two-step agentic architecture for insight generation on value stream map simulations. It splits orchestration, which picks data sources and runs multi-hop reasoning, from the actual analysis step. This keeps the internal context small while folding in domain knowledge through progressive discovery. The idea targets a real pain point where plain LLM calls miss subtle differences between similar simulation outputs in manufacturing workflows. That specific combination for VSM data is new as an applied result even if the underlying agentic pattern is not foundational. The architecture description itself is straightforward and shows honest attention to context limits and domain fit. They ran it across several top LLMs and report accuracies reaching 86% with good run-to-run stability. If the full paper includes ground-truth definitions and proper controls, this could help analysts who already work with these simulations. The evaluation section is the clear weak point. The abstract states the accuracy figures without baselines against direct prompting or single-agent versions, without explaining how accuracy is scored, and without dataset size, variance numbers, or error examples. That leaves open whether the decoupling itself drives the result or whether scale and prompting alone would suffice. The claim that existing approaches are structurally unfit also sits without direct comparison in the visible text. This work is for manufacturing simulation users and applied LLM engineers who need help turning complex VSM outputs into actionable notes. A reader already building domain-specific agents might borrow the orchestration split. It deserves peer review once the full manuscript adds the missing controls and shows the architecture beats simpler baselines; without those the central performance claim stays hard to judge.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a decoupled, two-step agentic architecture for extracting actionable insights from value stream map (VSM) simulations. By separating orchestration from data analysis, the framework enables progressive data discovery, intelligent selection of data sources, and multi-hop reasoning across data structures while maintaining a slim internal context. The authors report that this approach, tested with multiple state-of-the-art LLMs, achieves accuracies of up to 86% and high robustness across evaluation runs, addressing limitations of existing methods in detecting subtle situational differences.

Significance. If substantiated through rigorous evaluation, the work could advance practical applications of agentic LLM systems in domain-specific simulation analysis, such as operations research or manufacturing. The emphasis on architectural decoupling offers a potentially reusable pattern for handling complex, structured data with reduced context overhead. However, the absence of supporting evaluation details substantially weakens the ability to assess its broader impact or novelty relative to standard prompting techniques.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The claim that top-tier models achieve 'accuracies of up to 86%' and 'high robustness across evaluation runs' is presented without any description of the evaluation dataset, ground-truth insight definitions, the precise accuracy metric (e.g., exact match, semantic similarity threshold, or expert rating), baseline comparisons (such as direct LLM prompting or single-step agents), or quantitative robustness measures (e.g., per-run variance or confidence intervals). This omission makes it impossible to attribute performance gains to the proposed decoupled architecture rather than model scale or prompt design.
[Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that 'existing approaches are structurally unfit to pick up on subtle situational differences' is used to motivate the work but is not supported by any empirical comparison or ablation study in the manuscript. Without such evidence, the motivation for the two-step design remains untested.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: The acronym 'VSM' is introduced without an initial expansion to 'Value Stream Map', which could reduce accessibility for readers unfamiliar with the domain.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed feedback. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript's clarity and empirical grounding.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that top-tier models achieve 'accuracies of up to 86%' and 'high robustness across evaluation runs' is presented without any description of the evaluation dataset, ground-truth insight definitions, the precise accuracy metric (e.g., exact match, semantic similarity threshold, or expert rating), baseline comparisons (such as direct LLM prompting or single-step agents), or quantitative robustness measures (e.g., per-run variance or confidence intervals). This omission makes it impossible to attribute performance gains to the proposed decoupled architecture rather than model scale or prompt design.

Authors: We agree that the abstract presents the performance claims without sufficient methodological context, which limits the ability to evaluate them. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the abstract with a brief description of the evaluation dataset (VSM simulation scenarios), ground-truth insight definitions (expert-annotated), the accuracy metric (hybrid exact match and semantic similarity threshold validated by experts), baseline comparisons (direct LLM prompting and single-step agents), and robustness measures (standard deviation and confidence intervals across multiple runs). We will also add a dedicated results table in the Evaluation section explicitly comparing baselines to attribute gains to the decoupled architecture. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that 'existing approaches are structurally unfit to pick up on subtle situational differences' is used to motivate the work but is not supported by any empirical comparison or ablation study in the manuscript. Without such evidence, the motivation for the two-step design remains untested.

Authors: We agree that the conceptual motivation would be substantially strengthened by empirical evidence. While the manuscript provides a structural argument based on context-length and multi-hop reasoning limitations of single-pass approaches, we will add an ablation study in the revised version. This study will compare the proposed two-step architecture against direct LLM prompting and single-step agent baselines on the same VSM dataset, with specific metrics for detecting subtle situational differences. Results will be reported quantitatively in the Evaluation section to directly support the design choice. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in architecture proposal or empirical claims

full rationale

The paper proposes a decoupled two-step agentic architecture for extracting insights from VSM simulations and reports empirical results (up to 86% accuracy with LLMs) as a demonstration of viability. No equations, fitted parameters, self-citations, or derivation steps are present that reduce the architecture benefits or performance claims to inputs by construction. The separation of orchestration and data analysis is presented as a design choice with stated advantages, and results are shown separately without any reduction to prior definitions or renamings of known patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the architecture is described at a high level without mathematical or formal components.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5447 in / 1000 out tokens · 51006 ms · 2026-05-10T15:12:14.152976+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

[1]

Cognitive Science , author =

ISSN 0364-0213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(85)80012-4. URLhttps: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0364021385800124. Anthropic. Claude opus 4.6 system card. Technical report, Anthropic,

work page doi:10.1016/s0364-0213(85)80012-4
[2]

Akari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi

URLhttps://www.anthropic.com/ news/claude-opus-4-6. Akari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. Self-rag: Learning to retrieve, generate, and critique through self-reflection. InThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11,

2024
[3]

doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.030

ISSN 2212-8271. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.030. Jhon G. Botello, Brian Llinas, Jose J. Padilla, and Erika Frydenlund. Toward automating system dynamics modeling: Eval- uating llms in the transition from narratives to formal structures. In2025 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), pages 2380–2391,

work page doi:10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.030 2020
[4]

11338928

doi: 10.1109/WSC68292.2025.11338856. Tobias Carreira-Munich, Valent´ın Paz-Marcolla, and Rodrigo Castro. Devs copilot: Towards generative ai-assisted formal simulation modelling based on large language models. In2024 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), pages 2785–2796,

work page doi:10.1109/wsc68292.2025.11338856 2025
[5]

Climeworks

doi: 10.1109/WSC63780.2024.10838994. Climeworks. Climeworks,

work page doi:10.1109/wsc63780.2024.10838994 2024
[6]

CoRR , volume =

Yihong Dong, Xue Jiang, Jiaru Qian, Tian Wang, Kechi Zhang, Zhi Jin, and Ge Li. A survey on code generation with llm-based agents.ArXiv, abs/2508.00083,

work page arXiv
[7]

The Llama 3 Herd of Models

URLhttps://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:280416987. Aaron Grattafiori, Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, Abhinav Pandey, Abhishek Kadian, Ahmad Al-Dahle, Aiesha Letman, Akhil Mathur, Alan Schelten, Alex Vaughan, et al. The llama 3 herd of models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[8]

Survey on near-space information networks: Channel modeling, networking, and transmission perspectives,

ISSN 2169-3536. doi: 10.1109/access.2025.3549529. Omar Khattab, Keshav Santhanam, Xiang Lisa Li, David Hall, Percy Liang, Christopher Potts, and Matei Zaharia. Demonstrate-search-predict: Composing retrieval and language models for knowledge-intensive NLP.arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.14024,

work page doi:10.1109/access.2025.3549529 2025
[9]

Semantic uncertainty: Linguistic invariances for uncertainty estimation in natural language generation

Lorenz Kuhn, Yarin Gal, and Sebastian Farquhar. Semantic uncertainty: Linguistic invariances for uncertainty estimation in natural language generation. InThe Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2023, Kigali, Rwanda, May 1-5,

2023
[10]

Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learning

Alexandre Lacoste, Alexandra Luccioni, Victor Schmidt, and Thomas Dandres. Quantifying the carbon emissions of machine learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.09700,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1910
[11]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03875 , year=

Beibin Li, Konstantina Mellou, Bo Zhang, Jeevan Pathuri, and Ishai Menache. Large language models for supply chain optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03875,

work page arXiv
[12]

Personal llm agents: Insights and survey about the capability, efficiency and security

Yuanchun Li, Hao Wen, Weijun Wang, Xiangyu Li, Yizhen Yuan, Guohong Liu, Jiacheng Liu, Wenxing Xu, Xiang Wang, Yi Sun, Rui Kong, Yile Wang, Hanfei Geng, Jian Luan, Xuefeng Jin, Zi-Liang Ye, Guanjing Xiong, Fan Zhang, Xiang Li, Mengwei Xu, Zhijun Li, Peng Li, Yang Liu, Yaqiong Zhang, and Yunxin Liu. Personal llm agents: Insights and survey about the capabi...

work page arXiv
[13]

Ministral 3

URLhttps://api.semanticscholar. org/CorpusID:266933252. 11 Alexander H Liu, Kartik Khandelwal, Sandeep Subramanian, Victor Jouault, Abhinav Rastogi, Adrien Sad ´e, Alan Jeffares, Albert Jiang, Alexandre Cahill, Alexandre Gavaudan, et al. Ministral 3.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.08584,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[14]

doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2024.10.072

ISSN 2212-8271. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2024.10.072. Jiya Manchanda, Laura Boettcher, Matheus Westphalen, and Jasser Jasser. The open source advantage in large language models (llms).arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.12004,

work page doi:10.1016/j.procir.2024.10.072 2024
[15]

TaskWeaver: A code-first agent framework,

Bo Qiao, Liqun Li, Xu Zhang, Shilin He, Yu Kang, Chaoyun Zhang, Fangkai Yang, Hang Dong, Jue Zhang, Lu Wang, et al. Taskweaver: A code-first agent framework.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17541,

work page arXiv
[16]

Llm assisted value stream mapping

Micha Selak, Dirk Krechel, Adrian Ulges, Sven Spieckermann, Niklas Stoehr, and Andreas Loehr. Llm assisted value stream mapping. In2025 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), pages 2015–2026,

2015
[17]

11338928

doi: 10.1109/WSC68292.2025. 11338928. Kurt Shuster, Spencer Poff, Moya Chen, Douwe Kiela, and Jason Weston. Retrieval augmentation reduces hallucination in conversation. In Marie-Francine Moens, Xuanjing Huang, Lucia Specia, and Scott Wen-tau Yih, editors,Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021, pages 3784–3803, Punta Cana, D...

work page doi:10.1109/wsc68292.2025 2025
[18]

Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021 , pages =

Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.320. URLhttps: //aclanthology.org/2021.findings-emnlp.320/. Simio LLC. Simio simulation software.https://www.simio.com/,

work page doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.320 2021
[19]

Kilian Vernickel, Laura Brunner, Georg Hoellthaler, Giuseppe Sansivieri, Christian H ¨ardtlein, Ludwig Trauner, Lukas Bank, Jan Fischer, and Julia Berg

Accessed: 2026-04-11. Kilian Vernickel, Laura Brunner, Georg Hoellthaler, Giuseppe Sansivieri, Christian H ¨ardtlein, Ludwig Trauner, Lukas Bank, Jan Fischer, and Julia Berg. Machine-learning-based approach for parameterizing material flow simulation models.Proce- dia CIRP, 93:407–412,

2026
[20]

doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.018

ISSN 2212-8271. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.018. Marco Wrzalik, Julian Eversheim, Johannes Villmow, Adrian Ulges, Dirk Krechel, Sven Spieckermann, and Robert Forstner. V alue Stream Repair Using Graph Structure Learning, pages 15–32. Springer Nature Switzerland,

work page doi:10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.018 2020
[21]

doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-36822-6

ISBN 9783031368226. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-36822-6

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-36822-6
[22]

The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Search

Yutaro Yamada, Robert Tjarko Lange, Cong Lu, Shengran Hu, Chris Lu, Jakob Foerster, Jeff Clune, and David Ha. The ai scientist-v2: Workshop-level automated scientific discovery via agentic tree search.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08066,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[23]

Qwen3 Technical Report

An Yang, Anfeng Li, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Gao, Chengen Huang, Chenxu Lv, et al. Qwen3 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[24]

Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao

Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik R. Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. InThe Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2023, Kigali, Rwanda, May 1-5,

2023
[25]

GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering

URLhttps://openreview.net/forum?id=WE_ vluYUL-X. Aohan Zeng, Xin Lv, Zhenyu Hou, Zhengxiao Du, Qinkai Zheng, Bin Chen, Da Yin, Chendi Ge, Chengxing Xie, Cunxiang Wang, et al. Glm-5: from vibe coding to agentic engineering.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.15763,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[26]

ProSA: Assessing and understand- ing the prompt sensitivity of LLMs

Jingming Zhuo, Songyang Zhang, Xinyu Fang, Haodong Duan, Dahua Lin, and Kai Chen. ProSA: Assessing and understand- ing the prompt sensitivity of LLMs. In Yaser Al-Onaizan, Mohit Bansal, and Yun-Nung Chen, editors,Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024, pages 1950–1976, Miami, Florida, USA, November

2024
[27]

P ro SA : Assessing and understanding the prompt sensitivity of LLM s

As- sociation for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.108. URLhttps://aclanthology. org/2024.findings-emnlp.108/. 12

work page doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.108 2024