arxiv: 2604.12707 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 🪐 quant-ph · nlin.CD

Recognition: unknown

Quantum analogues of exponential sensitivity: from Loschmidt echo to Krylov complexity

Ignacio Garc\'ia-Mata , Diego A. Wisniacki

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph nlin.CD

keywords quantum chaosLoschmidt echoout-of-time-order correlatorsKrylov complexityLyapunov exponentexponential sensitivityquantum scramblingmany-body dynamics

0 comments

The pith

Quantum systems replace classical exponential divergence with three measurable analogues: the Loschmidt echo, out-of-time-order correlators, and Krylov complexity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Classical chaos produces exponential divergence of nearby trajectories, quantified by positive Lyapunov exponents. Quantum evolution is unitary, so no such trajectories or direct divergence exist. The paper reviews three quantities introduced to capture analogous sensitivity: the Loschmidt echo tracks return probability after a small perturbation in the Hamiltonian; out-of-time-order correlators measure how quickly operators cease to commute at different times; and Krylov complexity follows the spread of an operator in a Lanczos-like basis. These provide indirect diagnostics for quantum chaos and its links to scrambling and thermalization.

Core claim

The paper presents a pedagogical overview of three quantities that serve as quantum analogues to classical exponential sensitivity: the Loschmidt echo, out-of-time-order correlators (OTOCs), and Krylov complexity. Each quantity is shown to exhibit exponential growth or decay in chaotic regimes, thereby providing a way to quantify sensitivity to perturbations or operator growth despite the absence of classical trajectories.

What carries the argument

The Loschmidt echo, out-of-time-order correlators (OTOCs), and Krylov complexity, each functioning as a diagnostic that registers exponential sensitivity in quantum dynamics.

If this is right

The Loschmidt echo decay rate directly signals the strength of quantum chaos in perturbed evolutions.
OTOCs identify a scrambling time scale beyond which information is delocalized in many-body systems.
Krylov complexity grows linearly with time in chaotic phases, offering a basis for comparing operator growth across models.
All three quantities distinguish chaotic from integrable dynamics through their time dependence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The three quantities may be related through shared information-theoretic bounds that the review leaves open for future derivation.
They offer complementary probes that could be combined to classify the degree of chaos in open or driven quantum systems.
Connections to operator growth in random circuits or tensor networks could extend the diagnostics beyond closed unitary evolution.

Load-bearing premise

These three quantities reliably act as faithful analogues to classical chaos without quantum unitarity or interference introducing artifacts that break the analogy.

What would settle it

A concrete calculation or simulation in a known chaotic quantum map or many-body system where one quantity fails to show the expected exponential regime while the others do, or where none match the sign of the corresponding classical Lyapunov exponent.

read the original abstract

One of the fundamental manifestations of classical chaos is exponential sensitivity to initial conditions that is, two trajectories starting from nearly identical initial states diverge exponentially over time. This behavior is quantified by the Lyapunov exponents. Due to the unitary nature of quantum mechanics, such exponential divergence is elusive in quantum systems. As a result, several alternative quantities have been proposed and studied in recent years to capture analogous behavior. In this article, we present a pedagogical overview of three such quantities that have been the focus of intense research in recent years: the Loschmidt echo, out-of-time-order correlators (OTOCs), and Krylov complexity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

A clear pedagogical summary of three existing quantum proxies for chaos, with no new results or comparisons.

read the letter

This paper is a pedagogical overview of the Loschmidt echo, out-of-time-order correlators, and Krylov complexity as ways to capture something like exponential sensitivity in quantum systems. The main takeaway is that it brings together these ideas without adding any original derivations or new comparisons. It does a good job explaining the motivation for each quantity and how they relate to the classical Lyapunov exponent. The writing is clear enough that it could serve as an entry point for readers who are familiar with classical chaos but new to these quantum proxies. The soft spots are that it remains at the level of a summary. There is no head-to-head comparison of how well these three quantities agree or disagree in specific models, and the text does not appear to address cases where the quantum unitary evolution makes the analogy break down in interesting ways. Since the paper is explicitly positioned as an overview, this is not a major flaw, but it means the value is mostly in convenience rather than insight. This is the sort of paper that would be useful for a reading group of graduate students or early-career researchers in quantum information or many-body physics who want to get up to speed on the topic. Experts in the area probably won't find much they don't already know. It deserves to go to peer review because a reliable synthesis of the literature can be worth publishing even without new results, as long as the citations are fair and the explanations accurate.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a pedagogical review that discusses the challenges of observing exponential sensitivity to initial conditions in quantum systems due to unitary evolution, and presents an overview of three quantities proposed as analogues to classical Lyapunov exponents: the Loschmidt echo, out-of-time-order correlators (OTOCs), and Krylov complexity. It summarizes existing literature on these measures without advancing new derivations, theorems, or empirical results.

Significance. As a synthesis of established concepts in quantum chaos and information scrambling, the review could offer value as an entry point for newcomers to the field by connecting these three quantities. Its significance is primarily pedagogical rather than in advancing the state of the art, and would be enhanced by balanced coverage of limitations and open questions in the literature.

minor comments (2)

Abstract: the statement that these quantities 'capture analogous behavior' would benefit from a brief qualifier on the regimes (e.g., semiclassical limit or specific many-body systems) where the analogy holds most strongly, to avoid overgeneralization.
The review should explicitly note the absence of a single universal quantum Lyapunov exponent and discuss how the three quantities relate to or differ from each other in terms of what aspects of sensitivity they probe.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We appreciate the referee's review of our manuscript. Below we provide point-by-point responses to the comments.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The manuscript is a pedagogical review that discusses the challenges of observing exponential sensitivity to initial conditions in quantum systems due to unitary evolution, and presents an overview of three quantities proposed as analogues to classical Lyapunov exponents: the Loschmidt echo, out-of-time-order correlators (OTOCs), and Krylov complexity. It summarizes existing literature on these measures without advancing new derivations, theorems, or empirical results.

Authors: We agree with this characterization. Our manuscript is intended as a pedagogical review synthesizing the literature on these three quantities, as clearly indicated in the title and abstract. We do not claim to advance new derivations or results, but rather to provide an accessible overview connecting the Loschmidt echo, OTOCs, and Krylov complexity as quantum analogues of exponential sensitivity. revision: no
Referee: As a synthesis of established concepts in quantum chaos and information scrambling, the review could offer value as an entry point for newcomers to the field by connecting these three quantities. Its significance is primarily pedagogical rather than in advancing the state of the art, and would be enhanced by balanced coverage of limitations and open questions in the literature.

Authors: We are pleased that the referee sees value in the manuscript as a pedagogical entry point. We concur that a more explicit discussion of limitations and open questions would improve the balance. In the revised manuscript, we will include additional text highlighting the limitations of each approach (such as the sensitivity to the choice of initial state or operator in Krylov complexity, and the conditions under which OTOCs exhibit exponential growth) and outlining open questions in the field, such as their direct correspondence to classical Lyapunov exponents. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: pedagogical review with no original derivations

full rationale

The manuscript is explicitly a pedagogical overview summarizing established literature on Loschmidt echo, OTOCs, and Krylov complexity as quantum proxies for classical exponential sensitivity. No derivations, theorems, fitted parameters, or predictions are advanced within the paper itself; all content references prior work without self-referential loops or load-bearing self-citations that reduce claims to inputs by construction. The central presentation is self-contained as a review and does not invoke uniqueness theorems, ansatzes, or renamings that would trigger the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced; the paper reviews existing concepts without adding to the ledger.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5403 in / 1037 out tokens · 75814 ms · 2026-05-10T15:06:56.920276+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

The Quantum Kicked Rotor: A Paradigm of Quantum Chaos. Foundational aspects and new perspectives
quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

The quantum kicked rotor serves as a unifying model for classical and quantum chaos, covering foundational concepts, experimental realizations, and recent advances in topological and non-Hermitian physics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

155 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Bohigas, M.J

O. Bohigas, M.J. Giannoni and C. Schmit,Characterization of chaotic quantum spectra and universality of level fluctuation laws,Phys. Rev. Lett.52(1984) 1

1984
[2]

Haake,Quantum Signatures of Chaos, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1991)

F . Haake,Quantum Signatures of Chaos, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1991)

1991
[3]

T. Guhr, A. M ¨uller-Groeling and H.A. Weidenm¨uller,Random-matrix theories in quantum physics: common concepts,Physics Reports 299(1998) 189

1998
[4]

Peres,Stability of quantum motion in chaotic and regular systems,Phys

A. Peres,Stability of quantum motion in chaotic and regular systems,Phys. Rev. A30(1984) 1610

1984
[5]

Jalabert and H.M

R.A. Jalabert and H.M. Pastawski,Environment-independent decoherence rate in classically chaotic systems,Phys. Rev. Lett.86(2001) 2490

2001
[6]

Gorin, T.H

T. Gorin, T.H. Seligman and R.L. Weaver,Scattering fidelity in elastodynamics,Physical Review E73(2006) 015202

2006
[7]

Jacquod and C

Ph. Jacquod and C. Petitjean,Decoherence, entanglement and irreversibility in quantum dynamical systems with few degrees of freedom,Adv. Phys.58(2009) 67

2009
[8]

Goussev, R.A

A. Goussev, R.A. Jalabert, H.M. Pastawski and D.A. Wisniacki,Loschmidt echo,Scholarpedia7(2012) 11687

2012
[9]

Prosen and M

T. Prosen and M. ˇZnidariˇc,Stability of quantum motion and correlation decay,J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.35(2002) 1455

2002
[10]

Cucchietti, D

F . Cucchietti, D. Dalvit, J. Paz and W. Zurek,Decoherence and the Loschmidt echo,Phys. Rev. Lett.91(2003) 210403

2003
[11]

H. Quan, Z. Song, X. Liu, P . Zanardi and C. Sun,Decay of Loschmidt echo enhanced by quantum criticality,Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 140604

2006
[12]

Larkin and Y .N

A. Larkin and Y .N. Ovchinnikov,Quasiclassical method in the theory of superconductivity,Sov. Phys. JETP28(1969) 1200

1969
[13]

Shenker and D

S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford,Black holes and the butterfly effect,J. High Energy Phys.2014(2014) 67

2014
[14]

Maldacena, S.H

J. Maldacena, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford,Out-of-time-order correlators in quantum chaos,Journal of High Energy Physics2016 (2016) 1

2016
[15]

Swingle,Unscrambling the physics of out-of-time-order correlators,Nature Physics14(2018) 988

B. Swingle,Unscrambling the physics of out-of-time-order correlators,Nature Physics14(2018) 988

2018
[16]

Garc ´ıa-Mata, R

I. Garc ´ıa-Mata, R. Jalabert and D. Wisniacki,Out-of-time-order correlations and quantum chaos,Scholarpedia18(2023) 55237

2023
[17]

Kitaev,A simple model of quantum holography, talk given at KITP Program: Entanglement in Strongly-Correlated Quantum Matter, vol

A. Kitaev,A simple model of quantum holography, talk given at KITP Program: Entanglement in Strongly-Correlated Quantum Matter, vol. 7, USA April (2015)

2015
[18]

Parker, X

D.E. Parker, X. Cao, A. Avdoshkin, T. Scaffidi and E. Altman,A universal operator growth hypothesis,Phys. Rev. X9(2019) 041017

2019
[19]

Nandy, A.S

P . Nandy, A.S. Matsoukas-Roubeas, P . Mart´ınez-Azcona, A. Dymarsky and A. del Campo,Quantum dynamics in krylov space: Methods and applications,Physics Reports1125(2025) 1

2025
[20]

Krylov Complexity

E. Rabinovici, A. S ´anchez-Garrido, R. Shir and J. Sonner,Krylov complexity,arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06286(2025)

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[21]

Gorin, T

T. Gorin, T. Prosen, T.H. Seligman and M. ˇZnidariˇc,Dynamics of Loschmidt echoes and fidelity decay,Physics Reports435(2006) 33

2006
[22]

Z. Wang, J. Feng and B. Wu,Microscope for quantum dynamics with Planck cell resolution,Phys. Rev. Research3(2021) 033239

2021
[23]

Dematos and A.O

M.B. Dematos and A.O. Dealmeida,Quantization of anosov maps,Annals of Physics237(1995) 46

1995
[24]

Gutzwiller,Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics, vol

M.C. Gutzwiller,Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics, vol. 1 ofInterdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New Y ork (1990), 10.1007/978-1-4612-0983-6

work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0983-6 1990
[25]

Jacquod, P .G

P . Jacquod, P .G. Silvestrov and C.W.J. Beenakker,Golden rule decay versus lyapunov decay of the quantum loschmidt echo,Phys. Rev. E64(2001) 055203

2001
[26]

Vanicek,Dephasing representation: Employing the shadowing theorem to calculate quantum correlation functions,Phys

J. Vanicek,Dephasing representation: Employing the shadowing theorem to calculate quantum correlation functions,Phys. Rev. E70 (2004) 055201

2004
[27]

Vanicek,Dephasing representation of quantum fidelity for general pure and mixed states,Phys

J. Vanicek,Dephasing representation of quantum fidelity for general pure and mixed states,Phys. Rev. E73(2006) 046204

2006
[28]

Gorin, T

T. Gorin, T. Prosen and T.H. Seligman,A random matrix formulation of fidelity decay,New J. Phys.6(2004) 20

2004
[29]

Stoeckmann and R

H.-J. Stoeckmann and R. Sch ¨afer,Recovery of the fidelity amplitude for the gaussian ensembles,New J. Phys.6(2004) 199

2004
[30]

Kohler, I.E

H. Kohler, I.E. Smolyarenko, C. Pineda, T. Guhr, F . Leyvraz and T.H. Seligman,Surprising relations between parametric level correlations and fidelity decay,Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 190404

2008
[31]

Cucchietti, C.H

F .M. Cucchietti, C.H. Lewenkopf, E.R. Mucciolo, H.M. Pastawski and R.O. Vallejos,Measuring the lyapunov exponent using quantum mechanics,Phys. Rev. E65(2002) 046209

2002
[32]

De Raedt,Computer simulation of quantum phenomena in nanoscale devices,Annu

H. De Raedt,Computer simulation of quantum phenomena in nanoscale devices,Annu. Rev. Comput. Phys.4(1996) 107

1996
[33]

Tal-Ezer and R

H. Tal-Ezer and R. Kosloff,An accurate and efficient scheme for propagating the time dependent schr ¨odinger equation,J. Chem. Phys. 81(1984) 3967

1984
[34]

Guti ´errez and A

M. Guti ´errez and A. Goussev,Long-time saturation of the Loschmidt echo in quantum chaotic billiards,Phys. Rev. E79(2009) 046211

2009
[35]

Goussev, D

A. Goussev, D. Waltner, K. Richter and R.A. Jalabert,Loschmidt echo for local perturbations: non-monotonic cross-over from the fermi-golden-rule to the escape-rate regime,New J. Phys.10(2008) 093010

2008
[36]

Goussev, D

A. Goussev, D. Waltner, K. Richter and R.A. Jalabert,Loschmidt echo for local perturbations: non-monotonic cross-over from the fermi-golden-rule to the escape-rate regime,New Journal of Physics10(2008) 093010

2008
[37]

Ares and D.A

N. Ares and D.A. Wisniacki,Loschmidt echo and the local density of states,Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics80(2009) 046216

2009
[38]

Weinstein and C

Y . Weinstein and C. Hellberg,Quantum fidelity decay in quasi-integrable systems,Phys. Rev. E71(2005) 016209

2005
[39]

Jacquod, I

P . Jacquod, I. Adagideli and C.W. Beenakker,Anomalous power law of quantum reversibility forclassically regular dynamics,Europhysics letters61(2003) 729

2003
[40]

Prosen and M

T. Prosen and M. ˇZnidariˇc,Quantum freeze of fidelity decay for a class of integrable dynamics,New Journal of Physics5(2003) 109

2003
[41]

Hahn,Spin echoes,Physical Review80(1950) 580

E.L. Hahn,Spin echoes,Physical Review80(1950) 580

1950
[42]

W.-K. Rhim, A. Pines and J.S. Waugh,Time-reversal experiments in dipolar-coupled spin systems,Physical Review B3(1971) 684

1971
[43]

Levstein, G

P .R. Levstein, G. Usaj and H.M. Pastawski,Attenuation of polarization echoes in nuclear magnetic resonance: A study of the emergence of dynamical irreversibility in many-body quantum systems,The Journal of Chemical Physics108(1998) 2718

1998
[44]

Usaj, H.M

G. Usaj, H.M. Pastawski and P .R. Levstein,Gaussian to exponential crossover in the attenuation of polarization echoes in nmr,Molecular Physics95(1998) 1229

1998
[45]

Pastawski, P .R

H.M. Pastawski, P .R. Levstein, G. Usaj, J. Raya and J. Hirschinger,A nuclear magnetic resonance answer to the boltzmann-loschmidt controversy?,Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications283(2000) 166

2000
[46]

Sch ¨afer, H.-J

R. Sch ¨afer, H.-J. St¨ockmann, T. Gorin and T.H. Seligman,Experimental verification of fidelity decay: From perturbative to fermi golden rule regime,Physical Review Letters95(2005) 184102

2005
[47]

St ¨ockmann and R

H.-J. St ¨ockmann and R. Sch¨afer,Fidelity recovery in chaotic systems and the debye-waller factor,Physical Review Letters94(2005) 244101. Quantum analogues of exponential sensitivity: from Loschmidt echo to Krylov complexity15

2005
[48]

Kober, U

B. Kober, U. Kuhl, H.-J. St ¨ockmann, A. Goussev and K. Richter,Fidelity decay for local perturbations: Microwave evidence for oscillating decay exponents,Physical Review E83(2011) 016214

2011
[49]

Lobkis and R.L

O.I. Lobkis and R.L. Weaver,Coda-wave interferometry in finite solids: Recovery of p-to-s conversion rates in an elastodynamic billiard, Physical Review Letters90(2003) 254302

2003
[50]

Andersen, A

M. Andersen, A. Kaplan, T. Gr ¨unzweig and N. Davidson,Decay of quantum correlations in atom optics billiards with chaotic and mixed dynamics,Physical Review Letters97(2006) 104102

2006
[51]

S. Wu, A. Tonyushkin and M.G. Prentiss,Observation of saturation of fidelity decay with an atom interferometer,Physical Review Letters 103(2009) 034101

2009
[52]

Ullah and M

A. Ullah and M. Hoogerland,Experimental observation of loschmidt time reversal of a quantum chaotic system,Physical Review E83 (2011) 046218

2011
[53]

Martin, B

J. Martin, B. Georgeot and D.L. Shepelyansky,Cooling by time reversal of atomic matter waves,Physical Review Letters100(2008) 044106

2008
[54]

Fink,Time-reversed acoustics,Scientific American281(1999) 91

M. Fink,Time-reversed acoustics,Scientific American281(1999) 91

1999
[55]

Calvo, R.A

H.L. Calvo, R.A. Jalabert and H.M. Pastawski,Semiclassical theory of time-reversal focusing,Physical Review Letters101(2008) 240403

2008
[56]

Deutsch,Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis,Reports on Progress in Physics81(2018) 082001

J.M. Deutsch,Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis,Reports on Progress in Physics81(2018) 082001

2018
[57]

D’Alessio, Y

L. D’Alessio, Y . Kafri, A. Polkovnikov and M. Rigol,From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics,Advances in Physics65(2016) 239

2016
[58]

Heyl,Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review,Reports on Progress in Physics81(2018) 054001

M. Heyl,Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review,Reports on Progress in Physics81(2018) 054001

2018
[59]

Calabrese and J

P . Calabrese and J. Cardy,Quantum quenches in 1+1 dimensional conformal field theories,Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2016(2016) 064001

2016
[60]

Altman,Many-body localization,Annalen der Physik530(2018) 1700346

E. Altman,Many-body localization,Annalen der Physik530(2018) 1700346

2018
[61]

Nandkishore and D.A

R. Nandkishore and D.A. Huse,Many-body localization and thermalization in quantum statistical mechanics,Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics6(2015) 15

2015
[62]

Brown, D.A

A.R. Brown, D.A. Roberts, B. Swingle, Y . Zhao and Y . Zhang,Loschmidt echo and the many-body light cone,Physical Review Letters 116(2016) 220601

2016
[63]

Cotler, G

J.S. Cotler, G. Gur-Ari, M. Hanada, J. Polchinski, P . Saad, S.H. Shenker et al.,Black holes and random matrices,Journal of High Energy Physics2017(2017) 1

2017
[64]

X. Mi, M. Ippoliti, C. Quintana, A. Greene, Z. Chen, A. Ho et al.,Information scrambling in quantum circuits,Science376(2022) abg5029

2022
[65]

Zhang, G

J. Zhang, G. Pagano, P . Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P . Becker, H. Kaplan et al.,Observation of a many-body dynamical phase transition with a 53-qubit quantum simulator,Nature551(2017) 601

2017
[66]

B. Y an, L. Cincio and W.H. Zurek,Information scrambling and Loschmidt echo,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 160603

2020
[67]

Liao and V

Y . Liao and V. Galitski,Nonlinear sigma model approach to many-body quantum chaos: Regularized and unregularized out-of-time-ordered correlators,Phys. Rev. B98(2018) 205124

2018
[68]

Romero-Berm ´udez, K

A. Romero-Berm ´udez, K. Schalm and V. Scopelliti,Regularization dependence of the otoc. Which Lyapunov spectrum is the physical one?,Journal of High Energy Physics2019(2019) 107

2019
[69]

Sahu and B

S. Sahu and B. Swingle,Information scrambling at finite temperature in local quantum systems,Phys. Rev. B102(2020) 184303

2020
[70]

Shenker and D

S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford,Stringy effects in scrambling,J. High Energy Phys.2015(2015) 132

2015
[71]

Lieb and D.W

E.H. Lieb and D.W. Robinson,Lieb-Robinson bounds and the exponential clustering theorem,Commun. Math. Phys.28(1972) 251

1972
[72]

Roberts and B

D.A. Roberts and B. Swingle,Lieb-Robinson bound and the butterfly effect in quantum field theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 091602

2016
[73]

S. Xu, X. Li, Y .-T. Hsu, B. Swingle and S. Das Sarma,Butterfly effect in interacting aubry-andre model: Thermalization, slow scrambling, and many-body localization,Phys. Rev. Res.1(2019) 032039

2019
[74]

Xu and B

S. Xu and B. Swingle,Locality, quantum fluctuations, and scrambling,Phys. Rev. X9(2019) 031048

2019
[75]

Xu and B

S. Xu and B. Swingle,Accessing scrambling using matrix product operators,Nature Physics16(2020) 199

2020
[76]

Kurchan,Quantum bound to chaos and the semiclassical limit,Journal of Statistical Physics171(2018) 965

J. Kurchan,Quantum bound to chaos and the semiclassical limit,Journal of Statistical Physics171(2018) 965

2018
[77]

Schmitt and S

M. Schmitt and S. Kehrein,Irreversible dynamics in quantum many-body systems,Phys. Rev. B98(2018) 180301

2018
[78]

Schmitt, D

M. Schmitt, D. Sels, S. Kehrein and A. Polkovnikov,Semiclassical echo dynamics in the sachdev-ye-kitaev model,Phys. Rev. B99 (2019) 134301

2019
[79]

S ´anchez, A.K

C.M. S ´anchez, A.K. Chattah and H.M. Pastawski,Emergent decoherence induced by quantum chaos in a many-body system: A Loschmidt echo observation through NMR,Phys. Rev. A105(2022) 052232

2022
[80]

Rammensee, J.D

J. Rammensee, J.D. Urbina and K. Richter,Many-body quantum interference and the saturation of out-of-time-order correlators,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 124101

2018

Showing first 80 references.