pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12809 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 🌊 nlin.CD

Data-driven characterization of spatiotemporal chaos using ensemble reservoir computing

Xiaoqi Lei , Zixiang Yan , Jian Gao , Yueheng Lan , Jinghua Xiao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 13:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌊 nlin.CD
keywords ensemble reservoir computingspatiotemporal chaosuncertainty quantificationcoupled map latticefrozen random patterndefect diffusionchaotic intensityLyapunov exponent
0
0 comments X

The pith

The uncertainty in ensemble reservoir computing predictions directly encodes key dynamical properties of spatiotemporal chaos.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Spatiotemporal chaotic systems are challenging to characterize without models due to their complexity and sensitivity. This work develops an ensemble of local reservoir computers, each with slightly different hyperparameters, to forecast the evolution of coupled map lattices and measure uncertainty via the disagreement among their outputs. The central finding is that this disagreement directly reflects the system's dynamics: it pinpoints unchanging sites in frozen patterns, allows calculation of how defects spread in diffusive chaos, and indicates the level of disorder in turbulent states. Comparisons with power spectra and Lyapunov exponents confirm that the uncertainty field matches the underlying behavior. Thus, the ensemble method serves dual purposes of prediction and dynamical analysis from data alone.

Core claim

We show that the uncertainty quantified by the spread in an ensemble of reservoir computing predictions contains direct dynamical information about spatiotemporal chaos in coupled map lattices. Specifically, it identifies frozen positions, supports estimation of defect diffusion coefficients, and indicates chaotic intensity, with consistency verified through spatial power spectrum and Lyapunov exponent spectrum analyses.

What carries the argument

Ensemble spread in multiplexed local reservoir computing, which aggregates predictions from multiple models with randomized hyperparameters to compute predictive uncertainty that aligns with intrinsic system dynamics.

If this is right

  • Frozen positions in random patterns can be located solely from uncertainty maps derived from predictions.
  • Defect diffusion coefficients can be estimated directly from the spatial and temporal evolution of the uncertainty field in chaotic diffusion regimes.
  • Chaotic intensity in fully developed turbulence can be gauged using the average or distribution of uncertainty values.
  • The consistency with Lyapunov spectra suggests the uncertainty provides a proxy for local instability without computing exponents explicitly.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This data-driven characterization might extend to experimental systems where only time series data is available, such as in fluid experiments or biological networks.
  • The approach could inspire similar uncertainty-based diagnostics using other predictive models like neural networks for chaos.
  • Potential for developing hybrid methods combining this with traditional chaos measures to improve accuracy in high-dimensional systems.
  • If validated further, it may reduce reliance on full model simulations for studying extended nonlinear dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The ensemble spread directly captures the intrinsic dynamical unpredictability of the chaotic system rather than depending on specific choices of reservoir architecture or training procedures.

What would settle it

A test where the uncertainty field remains unchanged or loses its correlation with dynamical properties when the reservoir hyperparameters are varied or different training data segments are used would indicate that the spread is an artifact rather than a reflection of the system's dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12809 by Jian Gao, Jinghua Xiao, Xiaoqi Lei, Yueheng Lan, Zixiang Yan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The dynamics of a CML system. (a,d) (b,e) (c,f) represent spatial amplitude variation and spatio-temporal evolution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Prediction of the Logistic map by the ensemble reservoir computing framework. (a) Prediction horizons for trajectories [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Prediction of the CML system using the multiplexing local RC. The first three rows correspond to the true states, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Spatial power spectrum analysis of the CML system. The blue curves denote the spectra computed from the true [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Prediction of the frozen random pattern with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Prediction of defect chaotic diffusion with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Prediction of fully developed turbulence with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Spatiotemporal chaotic systems are difficult to characterize in a model-free manner because of their high dimensionality, strong nonlinearity, and sensitivity to initial conditions. Coupled map lattices, as a representative class of extended nonlinear systems, exhibit diverse regimes such as frozen random pattern, defect chaotic diffusion, and fully developed turbulence. In this work, we propose an ensemble version of multiplexing local reservoir computing for the data-driven characterization of spatiotemporal chaos. By constructing multiple base learners with randomized hyperparameters and combining their outputs, the method improves prediction robustness and quantifies predictive uncertainty through ensemble spread. More importantly, we show that this uncertainty contains direct dynamical information. It identifies frozen positions in frozen random pattern, supports the estimation of defect diffusion coefficients in defect chaotic diffusion, and provides an effective indicator of chaotic intensity in fully developed turbulence. Analyses of the spatial power spectrum and Lyapunov exponent spectrum further support the consistency between the uncertainty field and the intrinsic dynamical properties of the system. These results show that ensemble reservoir computing can serve not only as a prediction tool but also as a data-driven framework for the dynamical characterization of high-dimensional nonlinear systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an ensemble version of multiplexing local reservoir computing for data-driven characterization of spatiotemporal chaos in coupled map lattices. Multiple base learners with randomized hyperparameters are combined to improve prediction robustness, with ensemble spread used to quantify predictive uncertainty. The central claim is that this uncertainty encodes direct dynamical information: identifying frozen positions in frozen random patterns, supporting estimation of defect diffusion coefficients in defect chaotic diffusion, and serving as an indicator of chaotic intensity in fully developed turbulence. Consistency is checked via spatial power spectra and Lyapunov exponent spectra.

Significance. If the result holds, the work provides a potentially valuable model-free framework for extracting dynamical features from high-dimensional chaotic systems using only data and ensemble uncertainty, extending reservoir computing beyond pure prediction. The explicit consistency checks against power spectra and Lyapunov spectra are a strength, as is the unified treatment of prediction and characterization across multiple regimes of the coupled map lattice.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (ensemble construction): The claim that ensemble spread 'contains direct dynamical information' is load-bearing. The manuscript describes randomized hyperparameters for base learners but provides no invariance tests showing that the uncertainty field (e.g., high-uncertainty regions identifying frozen positions) remains unchanged under alterations to the randomization distribution, ensemble size, or ranges for spectral radius and input scaling. If these features shift, the dynamical content would be at least partly methodological rather than intrinsic.
  2. [§4.2] §4.2 (defect chaotic diffusion results): The estimation of defect diffusion coefficients from the spatial pattern of uncertainty is presented as supporting evidence. No quantitative validation (e.g., direct comparison or error metric against coefficients computed from the underlying CML equations or standard tracking methods) is reported; support appears limited to qualitative agreement with power spectra.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions (e.g., those showing uncertainty fields) should explicitly state the hyperparameter sampling ranges and ensemble size used, to support reproducibility of the reported patterns.
  2. [§2] The local reservoir update rule for the base multiplexing method is referenced but not written out as an equation before introducing the ensemble extension; adding this would improve clarity for readers unfamiliar with the base architecture.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments highlight important aspects for strengthening the claims regarding the dynamical content of the ensemble uncertainty. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions in the next version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (ensemble construction): The claim that ensemble spread 'contains direct dynamical information' is load-bearing. The manuscript describes randomized hyperparameters for base learners but provides no invariance tests showing that the uncertainty field (e.g., high-uncertainty regions identifying frozen positions) remains unchanged under alterations to the randomization distribution, ensemble size, or ranges for spectral radius and input scaling. If these features shift, the dynamical content would be at least partly methodological rather than intrinsic.

    Authors: We agree that explicit invariance tests are required to support the claim that the uncertainty encodes intrinsic dynamical information. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated robustness analysis subsection to §3. This will include systematic variations of ensemble size (e.g., 5–50 members), randomization distributions for hyperparameters, and ranges for spectral radius and input scaling. We will quantify consistency of the uncertainty field using spatial correlation metrics and overlap of high-uncertainty regions across these choices, with new figures demonstrating that key features (such as frozen-position identification) remain stable. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (defect chaotic diffusion results): The estimation of defect diffusion coefficients from the spatial pattern of uncertainty is presented as supporting evidence. No quantitative validation (e.g., direct comparison or error metric against coefficients computed from the underlying CML equations or standard tracking methods) is reported; support appears limited to qualitative agreement with power spectra.

    Authors: The referee is correct that only qualitative support via power spectra is currently provided. While direct defect tracking in the CML is feasible, it was not performed in the original study. In the revision, we will add quantitative validation to §4.2 by computing defect diffusion coefficients via standard mean-squared-displacement tracking on the underlying CML trajectories and comparing them to the estimates derived from the uncertainty field. Relative errors and correlation coefficients will be reported, together with a brief discussion of any discrepancies. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; uncertainty derived independently then validated against external measures

full rationale

The paper constructs ensemble spread from multiple reservoir computers with randomized hyperparameters, producing an uncertainty field as output. This field is subsequently compared to independent quantities (frozen positions, defect diffusion coefficients estimated separately, spatial power spectra, and Lyapunov exponent spectra). No equation defines the uncertainty via the target dynamical features, no parameter is fitted to the claimed indicators, and no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness result. The chain remains self-contained: ensemble disagreement is generated first, then observed to correlate with system properties computed by standard methods outside the reservoir framework.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is incomplete. Reservoir computing typically assumes the system is observable from time series and that randomized reservoirs can approximate dynamics, but no specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable here.

free parameters (1)
  • reservoir hyperparameters
    Randomized hyperparameters for base learners are mentioned but not specified; these are typically tuned or chosen and affect ensemble spread.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5494 in / 1179 out tokens · 30959 ms · 2026-05-10T13:39:50.172608+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Introduction Spatiotemporal chaotic systems arise in a wide range of natural and engineered settings, including climate dynamics, fluid systems, and neural activity [1–3]. Their evolution is shaped by high dimensionality, strong nonlinearity, and extreme sensitivity to initial conditions, which makes the characterization of their complex patterns and dyna...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    A CML consists of a set of low-dimensional chaotic maps defined on lattice sites and coupled through local interactions between neighboring sites

    Coupled Map Lattice Coupled map lattices are prototypical models widely used in the study of spatiotemporal chaos because of their rich dynamical behaviors, including the coexistence of ordered and disordered phases [4–9]. A CML consists of a set of low-dimensional chaotic maps defined on lattice sites and coupled through local interactions between neighb...

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    Their operation can be divided into two stages, training and prediction

    Ensemble Reservoir Computing Traditional single and ensemble reservoir computing frameworks both consist of three main components, namely an input module, a reservoir network, and an output module. Their operation can be divided into two stages, training and prediction. In a single reservoir computing model, prediction performance may vary because of the ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The prediction of the ensemble RC in the CML system For spatiotemporal chaotic systems, especially those with coexistence of ordered and disordered regions, prediction difficulty can vary substantially across space and time. Although the multiplexing local reservoir computing framework has demonstrated high efficiency and good generalization ability for C...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Dynamical Analysis of CML with Novel RC Framework Beyond prediction, the multiplexing local RC with ensemble framework provides a unified tool for both forecasting and dynamical characterization of the CML system. By combining ensemble mean predictions with the associated ensemble standard deviation, key physical quantities can be extracted that are other...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Summary Traditional reservoir computing has demonstrated good predictive performance for general dynamical systems. However, in high-dimensional spatiotemporal chaotic systems with coexisting ordered and disordered regions, predic- tion horizons vary across the lattice, making it challenging to characterize the true dynamical behavior. Ensemble learning n...

    work page

  7. [7]

    CRC Press, 1995

    Arjen Doelman and Aart Van Harten.Nonlinear dynamics and pattern formation in the natural environment, volume 335. CRC Press, 1995

    work page 1995

  8. [8]

    Spatio-temporal fluid dynamics modeling via physical-awareness and parameter diffusion guidance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.13850, 2024

    Hao Wu, Fan Xu, Yifan Duan, Ziwei Niu, Weiyan Wang, Gaofeng Lu, Kun Wang, Yuxuan Liang, and Yang Wang. Spatio-temporal fluid dynamics modeling via physical-awareness and parameter diffusion guidance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.13850, 2024. 12

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Online spatio-temporal learning in deep neural networks.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 34(11):8894–8908, 2022

    Thomas Bohnstingl, Stanis law Wo´ zniak, Angeliki Pantazi, and Evangelos Eleftheriou. Online spatio-temporal learning in deep neural networks.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 34(11):8894–8908, 2022

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Spatiotemporal chaos in one-and two-dimensional coupled map lattices.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenom- ena, 37(1-3):60–82, 1989

    Kunihiko Kaneko. Spatiotemporal chaos in one-and two-dimensional coupled map lattices.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenom- ena, 37(1-3):60–82, 1989

    work page 1989

  11. [11]

    Spatiotemporal intermittency in coupled map lattices.Progress of Theoretical Physics, 74(5):1033–1044, 1985

    Kunihiko Kaneko. Spatiotemporal intermittency in coupled map lattices.Progress of Theoretical Physics, 74(5):1033–1044, 1985

    work page 1985

  12. [12]

    Spacetime chaos in coupled map lattices.Nonlinearity, 1(4):491, 1988

    Leonid A Bunimovich and Ya G Sinai. Spacetime chaos in coupled map lattices.Nonlinearity, 1(4):491, 1988

    work page 1988

  13. [13]

    World Scientific, 1986

    Kunihiko Kaneko.Collapse of tori and genesis of chaos in dissipative systems. World Scientific, 1986

    work page 1986

  14. [14]

    field theory of chaos

    Kunihiko Kaneko. Period-doubling of kink-antikink patterns, quasiperiodicity in antiferro-like structures and spatial intermittency in coupled logistic lattice: towards a prelude of a “field theory of chaos”.Progress of Theoretical Physics, 72(3):480–486, 1984

    work page 1984

  15. [15]

    Phenomenology of spatio-temporal chaos

    James P Crutchfield and Kunihiko Kaneko. Phenomenology of spatio-temporal chaos. InDirections In Chaos—Volume 1, pages 272–353. World Scientific, 1987

    work page 1987

  16. [16]

    echo state

    Herbert Jaeger. The “echo state” approach to analysing and training recurrent neural networks-with an erratum note. Bonn, Germany: German National Research Center for Information Technology GMD Technical Report, 148(34):13, 2001

    work page 2001

  17. [17]

    Real-time computing without stable states: A new framework for neural computation based on perturbations.Neural computation, 14(11):2531–2560, 2002

    Wolfgang Maass, Thomas Natschl¨ ager, and Henry Markram. Real-time computing without stable states: A new framework for neural computation based on perturbations.Neural computation, 14(11):2531–2560, 2002

    work page 2002

  18. [18]

    Reservoir computing approaches to recurrent neural network training.Computer science review, 3(3):127–149, 2009

    Mantas Lukoˇ seviˇ cius and Herbert Jaeger. Reservoir computing approaches to recurrent neural network training.Computer science review, 3(3):127–149, 2009

    work page 2009

  19. [19]

    Hunt, Michelle Girvan, and Edward Ott

    Jaideep Pathak, Zhixin Lu, Brian R. Hunt, Michelle Girvan, and Edward Ott. Using machine learning to replicate chaotic attractors and calculate lyapunov exponents from data.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 27(12), 2017

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Hunt, Michelle Girvan, Roger Brockett, and Edward Ott

    Zhixin Lu, Jaideep Pathak, Brian R. Hunt, Michelle Girvan, Roger Brockett, and Edward Ott. Reservoir observers: Model- free inference of unmeasured variables in chaotic systems.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 27(4), 2017

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Model-free prediction of large spatiotemporally chaotic systems from data: A reservoir computing approach.Physical review letters, 120(2):024102, 2018

    Jaideep Pathak, Brian Hunt, Michelle Girvan, Zhixin Lu, and Edward Ott. Model-free prediction of large spatiotemporally chaotic systems from data: A reservoir computing approach.Physical review letters, 120(2):024102, 2018

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Hunt, and Edward Ott

    Zhixin Lu, Brian R. Hunt, and Edward Ott. Attractor reconstruction by machine learning.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 28(6), 2018

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Hunt, Michelle Girvan, et al

    Jaideep Pathak, Alexander Wikner, Rebeckah Fussell, Sarthak Chandra, Brian R. Hunt, Michelle Girvan, et al. Hybrid forecasting of chaotic processes: Using machine learning in conjunction with a knowledge-based model.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 28(4), 2018

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Using reservoir computers to distinguish chaotic signals.Physical Review E, 98(5):052209, 2018

    Thomas L Carroll. Using reservoir computers to distinguish chaotic signals.Physical Review E, 98(5):052209, 2018

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Machine-learning inference of fluid variables from data using reservoir computing

    Kengo Nakai and Yoshitaka Saiki. Machine-learning inference of fluid variables from data using reservoir computing. Physical Review E, 98(2):023111, 2018

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Zimmermann and Ulrich Parlitz

    Roland S. Zimmermann and Ulrich Parlitz. Observing spatio-temporal dynamics of excitable media using reservoir com- puting.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 28(4), 2018

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Synchronization of chaotic systems and their machine-learning models.Physical Review E, 99(4):042203, 2019

    Tongfeng Weng, Huijie Yang, Changgui Gu, Jie Zhang, and Michael Small. Synchronization of chaotic systems and their machine-learning models.Physical Review E, 99(4):042203, 2019

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    Gauthier

    Aaron Griffith, Andrew Pomerance, and Daniel J. Gauthier. Forecasting chaotic systems with very low connectivity reservoir computers.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 29(12), 2019

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Model-free prediction of spatiotemporal dynamical systems with recurrent neural networks: Role of network spectral radius.Physical Review Research, 1(3):033056, 2019

    Junjie Jiang and Yingcheng Lai. Model-free prediction of spatiotemporal dynamical systems with recurrent neural networks: Role of network spectral radius.Physical Review Research, 1(3):033056, 2019

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    Long-term prediction of chaotic systems with machine learning.Physical Review Research, 2(1):012080, 2020

    Huawei Fan, Junjie Jiang, Chun Zhang, Xingang Wang, and Yingcheng Lai. Long-term prediction of chaotic systems with machine learning.Physical Review Research, 2(1):012080, 2020

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Predicting phase and sensing phase coherence in chaotic systems with machine learning.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 30(8), 2020

    Chun Zhang, Junjie Jiang, Shixian Qu, and Yingcheng Lai. Predicting phase and sensing phase coherence in chaotic systems with machine learning.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 30(8), 2020

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Transfer learning of chaotic systems

    Yali Guo, Han Zhang, Liang Wang, Huawei Fan, Jinghua Xiao, and Xingang Wang. Transfer learning of chaotic systems. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 31(1), 2021

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Symmetry enhanced prediction of spatio- temporal chaotic system with reservoir computing.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 202:117634, 2026

    Xiaoqi Lei, Zixiang Yan, Hui Zhao, Jian Gao, Yueheng Lan, and Jinghua Xiao. Symmetry enhanced prediction of spatio- temporal chaotic system with reservoir computing.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 202:117634, 2026

    work page 2026

  34. [34]

    Machine learning prediction of critical transition and system collapse.Physical Review Research, 3(1):013090, 2021

    Ling-Wei Kong, Hua-Wei Fan, Celso Grebogi, and Ying-Cheng Lai. Machine learning prediction of critical transition and system collapse.Physical Review Research, 3(1):013090, 2021

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Emergence of transient chaos and intermittency in machine learning.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 2(3):035014, 2021

    Ling-Wei Kong, Huawei Fan, Celso Grebogi, and Ying-Cheng Lai. Emergence of transient chaos and intermittency in machine learning.Journal of Physics: Complexity, 2(3):035014, 2021

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Predicting amplitude death with machine learning

    Rui Xiao, Ling-Wei Kong, Zhong-Kui Sun, and Ying-Cheng Lai. Predicting amplitude death with machine learning. Physical Review E, 104(1):014205, 2021

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Shirin Panahi and Ying-Cheng Lai. Adaptable reservoir computing: A paradigm for model-free data-driven prediction of critical transitions in nonlinear dynamical systems.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 34(5), 2024

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    A survey on ensemble learning.Frontiers of Computer Science, 14(2):241–258, 2020

    Xibin Dong, Zhiwen Yu, Wenming Cao, Yifan Shi, and Qianli Ma. A survey on ensemble learning.Frontiers of Computer Science, 14(2):241–258, 2020

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Ensemble learning: A survey.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: data mining and knowledge discovery, 8(4):e1249, 2018

    Omer Sagi and Lior Rokach. Ensemble learning: A survey.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: data mining and knowledge discovery, 8(4):e1249, 2018

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Ensemble learning

    Zhi-Hua Zhou. Ensemble learning. InMachine learning, pages 181–210. Springer, 2021. 13

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Complexity, initial condition sensitivity, dimension and weak chaos in dynamical systems.Nonlinearity, 16(4):1219–1238, 2003

    Stefano Galatolo. Complexity, initial condition sensitivity, dimension and weak chaos in dynamical systems.Nonlinearity, 16(4):1219–1238, 2003

    work page 2003

  42. [42]

    Sensitive dependence on initial conditions in transition to turbulence in pipe flow

    Holger Faisst and Bruno Eckhardt. Sensitive dependence on initial conditions in transition to turbulence in pipe flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 504:343–352, 2004

    work page 2004

  43. [43]

    Second-order trajectory sensitivity analysis of hybrid systems.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 66(5):1922–1934, 2019

    Sijia Geng and Ian A Hiskens. Second-order trajectory sensitivity analysis of hybrid systems.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 66(5):1922–1934, 2019

    work page 1922

  44. [44]

    Finite time lyapunov exponent and advection-diffusion equation.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 95(3-4):283–305, 1996

    Xian Zhu Tang and Allen H Boozer. Finite time lyapunov exponent and advection-diffusion equation.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 95(3-4):283–305, 1996

    work page 1996

  45. [45]

    Uncertainty in finite-time lyapunov exponent computations.Journal of Computational Dynamics, 7(2), 2020

    Sanjeeva Balasuriya. Uncertainty in finite-time lyapunov exponent computations.Journal of Computational Dynamics, 7(2), 2020

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Nonlinear finite-time lyapunov exponent and predictability.Physics Letters A, 364(5):396– 400, 2007

    Ruiqiang Ding and Jianping Li. Nonlinear finite-time lyapunov exponent and predictability.Physics Letters A, 364(5):396– 400, 2007

    work page 2007

  47. [47]

    Estimation of spatial power spectra in speckle interferometry.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 69(5):786–790, 1979

    JC Dainty and A Hr Greenaway. Estimation of spatial power spectra in speckle interferometry.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 69(5):786–790, 1979

    work page 1979

  48. [48]

    A statistical spatial power spectrum of the earth’s lithospheric magnetic field

    Erwan Th´ ebault and Foteini Vervelidou. A statistical spatial power spectrum of the earth’s lithospheric magnetic field. Geophysical Journal International, 201(2):605–620, 2015

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Analytical modeling of adaptive optics: foundations of the phase spatial power spectrum approach.Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 23(2):382–394, 2006

    Laurent Jolissaint, Jean-Pierre V´ eran, and Rodolphe Conan. Analytical modeling of adaptive optics: foundations of the phase spatial power spectrum approach.Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 23(2):382–394, 2006

    work page 2006