pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12838 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Recognition: unknown

2D quantum-path interference in high-harmonic generation driven by highly-bichromatic fields

Xiaozhou Zou , Lucie Jurkovi\v{c}ov\'a , Anne Weber , Cong Zhao , Martin Albrecht , Ond\v{r}ej Finke , Alexandr Vendl , Annika Grenfell
show 7 more authors
Wojciech Szuba Jaroslav Nejdl Eric Constant Margarita Khokhlova Emilio Pisanty Ond\v{r}ej Hort Amelle Za\"ir
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics
keywords high-harmonic generationquantum-path interferencebichromatic fieldsattosecond dynamicsstrong-field approximationsaddle-point methodorthogonal polarization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Orthogonally-polarized bichromatic laser fields produce two-dimensional quantum-path interference in high-harmonic generation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper experimentally demonstrates a new form of quantum-path interference that occurs in two dimensions when high-harmonic generation is driven by two orthogonally polarized colors of comparable intensity. Measurements show that the intensity of odd-order harmonics varies in a single-peaked way with the relative phase of the two colors, while even-order harmonics exhibit a double-peaked structure. Calculations based on the strong-field approximation and saddle-point method attribute these patterns to multiple quantum orbits whose contributions inherit the symmetry of the driving field. This observation lifts the quantum paths from one to two dimensions, providing a new spectroscopic handle on attosecond electron dynamics during the harmonic generation process.

Core claim

In the highly-bichromatic regime of orthogonally-polarised driving fields, the measured harmonic intensity modulations with respect to the relative phase encode two-dimensional quantum-path interference (2D-QPI) among multiple quantum orbits. The dipole response for both odd and even harmonics inherits the dynamic symmetry of the driving field, with odd harmonics showing monomodal and even harmonics bimodal modulation patterns.

What carries the argument

Two-dimensional quantum-path interference (2D-QPI) among multiple quantum orbits, revealed through phase-dependent intensity modulations in the strong-field approximation and saddle-point calculations.

If this is right

  • The intensity modulations of odd harmonics follow a monomodal pattern with relative phase.
  • Even harmonics exhibit a bimodal modulation structure.
  • The dipole response inherits the dynamic symmetry of the orthogonally-polarised bichromatic field.
  • This provides a novel route to HHG spectroscopy of attosecond electron dynamics by increasing the dimensionality of interfering quantum paths.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar phase control could be applied to other nonlinear optical processes involving multiple colors to probe electron dynamics.
  • Extending this to higher dimensions or more colors might further enhance spectroscopic resolution in attosecond science.
  • Macroscopic effects in HHG might need careful separation from the microscopic 2D-QPI in future experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The observed phase-dependent intensity modulations are caused solely by two-dimensional quantum-path interference and are not significantly modified by propagation effects, detector response, or other experimental factors.

What would settle it

If saddle-point calculations that omit the interference between multiple orbits fail to reproduce the measured monomodal and bimodal phase modulations for odd and even harmonics, the 2D-QPI interpretation would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12838 by Alexandr Vendl, Amelle Za\"ir, Anne Weber, Annika Grenfell, Cong Zhao, Emilio Pisanty, Eric Constant, Jaroslav Nejdl, Lucie Jurkovi\v{c}ov\'a, Margarita Khokhlova, Martin Albrecht, Ond\v{r}ej Finke, Ond\v{r}ej Hort, Wojciech Szuba, Xiaozhou Zou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic of the experimental setup. The fundamental beam generates the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Far-field spatially-resolved HHG spectra for relative phase of (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Two-colour relative phase scan; (b,c) experimental data (circles) and SFA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Ionisation and recombination times for a two-colour field with intensity ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Polarisation ellipse. The contributions of the various trajectories are then shown in terms of their major polarisation axes M of the harmonic dipole ellipse. That is, the electric field associated with a harmonic dipole Ds(qω) can be expressed as Eqω(t) = Ds(qω) eiqωt = eiγ (M + iN) , (7) where M and N are the major and minor polarisation axes, respectively, and γ is known as a rectifying phase [42], as s… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Total harmonic intensity modulation (top subpanels) as well as the main [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Displacements s(Re(t)) for two short trajectories within one optical cycle for a two-colour field as above, with ϕω-2ω = 0, for the two subsequent harmonic orders 24 and 25 shown (a) over time, and (b) in space. To visualise this further, in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We experimentally observe a new type of quantum-path interference, in two-dimensions (2D-QPI), in high-harmonic generation (HHG) driven by an orthogonally-polarised highly-bichromatic field. This regime is marked by comparable intensities of the two orthogonal colours. In this highly-bichromatic regime, we demonstrate that 2D-QPI is encoded in the measured harmonic intensity modulations with respect to the relative phase of the two-colour field. The modulations of the odd-order harmonics show a monomodal behaviour, whereas the even harmonics are modulated in a bimodal structure. Our calculations using the strong-field approximation and saddle-point method disentangle contributions from multiple quantum orbits in this HHG regime, revealing that the dipole response for both odd and even harmonics inherits the dynamic symmetry of the orthogonally-polarised driving field. This new type of 2D-QPI offers a novel route to HHG spectroscopy of attosecond electron dynamics by lifting up the dimensionality of the quantum paths involved in the interference.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to experimentally observe a new type of two-dimensional quantum-path interference (2D-QPI) in high-harmonic generation driven by an orthogonally polarized highly-bichromatic field with comparable intensities. Odd-order harmonics exhibit monomodal intensity modulations and even-order harmonics bimodal modulations versus the relative phase of the two colors. Strong-field approximation and saddle-point calculations at the single-atom level are used to attribute these patterns to the dipole response inheriting the driving field's dynamic symmetry, proposing 2D-QPI as a novel route to attosecond HHG spectroscopy via increased path dimensionality.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the result would be significant for attosecond science by introducing a higher-dimensional quantum-path interference mechanism that could improve spectroscopic access to electron dynamics. The combination of direct experimental measurements with established theoretical tools (SFA and saddle-point method) is a strength, as is the focus on symmetry properties of the dipole response. However, the current lack of macroscopic propagation analysis limits the immediate impact and falsifiability of the interpretation.

major comments (2)
  1. The theoretical calculations section performs SFA and saddle-point analysis only at the single-atom level and reproduces symmetry properties, but provides no phase-matching simulations, gas-pressure scans, or propagation modeling. Since the experiment is performed in a gas jet and the relative phase can alter wave-vector mismatch and Gouy-phase contributions, this leaves open whether the monomodal/bimodal modulations could be imprinted or distorted by macroscopic effects rather than arising exclusively from 2D-QPI among multiple orbits. This is load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. The experimental results lack quantitative details on error bars, data averaging, selection criteria, or explicit checks excluding alternative explanations such as detector response. This is critical because the evidence for the new 2D-QPI rests on the specific form of the phase-dependent intensity modulations reported for odd and even harmonics.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and introduction could more explicitly define the intensity ratio and frequency ratio that characterize the 'highly-bichromatic' regime to aid reproducibility.
  2. Figure captions and axis labels should consistently specify the harmonic orders shown and the range of relative phases scanned.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional details and discussion where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The theoretical calculations section performs SFA and saddle-point analysis only at the single-atom level and reproduces symmetry properties, but provides no phase-matching simulations, gas-pressure scans, or propagation modeling. Since the experiment is performed in a gas jet and the relative phase can alter wave-vector mismatch and Gouy-phase contributions, this leaves open whether the monomodal/bimodal modulations could be imprinted or distorted by macroscopic effects rather than arising exclusively from 2D-QPI among multiple orbits. This is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of macroscopic propagation analysis for a complete picture. However, the monomodal and bimodal phase-dependent modulations are a direct signature of the dynamic symmetry of the orthogonally polarized driving field as imprinted on the single-atom dipole response, which our SFA and saddle-point calculations explicitly demonstrate for both odd and even harmonics. Propagation effects in a gas jet primarily modulate the overall conversion efficiency through phase-matching but do not selectively generate or invert the distinct modulation symmetries observed between odd and even orders. To strengthen the manuscript, we have added a dedicated paragraph discussing the expected role of wave-vector mismatch and Gouy phase in this regime and explaining why the single-atom interpretation remains robust for the reported interference patterns. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The experimental results lack quantitative details on error bars, data averaging, selection criteria, or explicit checks excluding alternative explanations such as detector response. This is critical because the evidence for the new 2D-QPI rests on the specific form of the phase-dependent intensity modulations reported for odd and even harmonics.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative experimental details are essential for establishing the reliability of the observed modulations. In the revised manuscript we have added error bars (standard deviation from repeated scans), a description of the data-averaging protocol, explicit selection criteria for the harmonics, and supplementary checks confirming that the monomodal and bimodal patterns persist under varied detector settings and are independent of detector response functions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: experimental observation supported by standard theory

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an experimental observation of 2D-QPI patterns in HHG intensity modulations, reproduced via the established strong-field approximation and saddle-point method applied at the single-atom level. These methods are standard in the field and not derived from or fitted to the present data; the calculations are used to interpret symmetry properties inherited from the driving field rather than to predict or define the measured modulations. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided derivation chain. The result remains self-contained against external benchmarks of SFA/Saddle-point validity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on experimental observation of phase-dependent harmonic intensities and on theoretical disentanglement performed with the strong-field approximation and saddle-point method. No explicit free parameters are stated in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The strong-field approximation remains valid for describing electron dynamics in the highly-bichromatic orthogonal regime.
    Invoked to model the dipole response and disentangle quantum orbits.
  • domain assumption The saddle-point method correctly identifies the dominant quantum paths contributing to the observed interference.
    Used in the calculations to separate contributions from multiple orbits.
invented entities (1)
  • 2D quantum-path interference (2D-QPI) no independent evidence
    purpose: To label the new interference phenomenon arising from the two-dimensional character of electron paths in orthogonal bichromatic fields.
    Introduced as the central novel observation; no independent falsifiable prediction outside the reported data is given.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5551 in / 1392 out tokens · 69068 ms · 2026-05-10T16:03:02.990340+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [2]

    Attosecond metrology

    M. Hentschel et al. “Attosecond metrology”. In:Nature414.6863 (2001), pp. 509– 513.doi:10.1038/35107000

    work page doi:10.1038/35107000 2001

  2. [3]

    Shining the shortest flashes of light on the secret life of electrons

    M. Khokhlova, E. Pisanty, and A. Za¨ ır. “Shining the shortest flashes of light on the secret life of electrons”. In:Adv. Photonics5.6 (2023), p. 060501.doi: 10.1117/1.AP.5.6.060501

    work page doi:10.1117/1.ap.5.6.060501 2023

  3. [5]

    Dynamics of Short-Pulse Excitation, Ionization and Harmonic Conversion

    K. C. Kulander, K. J. Schafer, and J. L. Krause. “Dynamics of Short-Pulse Excitation, Ionization and Harmonic Conversion”. In:Super-Intense Laser-Atom Physics. Springer US, 1993, pp. 95–110.doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-7963-2_10

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-7963-2_10 1993

  4. [6]

    Enhancement of high-order harmonic generation by a two- color field: Influence of propagation effects

    K. Schiessl et al. “Enhancement of high-order harmonic generation by a two- color field: Influence of propagation effects”. In:Physical Review A74.5 (2006), p. 053412.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.74.053412

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.74.053412 2006

  5. [7]

    High-order harmonic generation by two linearly polarized laser fields with an arbitrary angle between their polarization axes

    D. Habibovi´ c, W. Becker, and D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c. “High-order harmonic generation by two linearly polarized laser fields with an arbitrary angle between their polarization axes”. In:Physical Review A106.2 (2022), p. 023119.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevA.106.023119

    2022

  6. [8]

    Highly Efficient High-Harmonic Generation in an Orthogonally Polarized Two-Color Laser Field

    I. J. Kim et al. “Highly Efficient High-Harmonic Generation in an Orthogonally Polarized Two-Color Laser Field”. In:Physical Review Letters94.24 (2005), p. 243901.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.243901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.243901 2005

  7. [9]

    Highly versatile, two-color setup for high-order harmonic generation using spatial light modulators

    A.-K. Raab et al. “Highly versatile, two-color setup for high-order harmonic generation using spatial light modulators”. In:Review of Scientific Instruments 95.7 (2024).doi:10.1063/5.0212578

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0212578 2024

  8. [10]

    Generation of a strong attosecond pulse train with an orthogonally polarized two-color laser field

    C. M. Kim, I. J. Kim, and C. H. Nam. “Generation of a strong attosecond pulse train with an orthogonally polarized two-color laser field”. In:Physical Review A 72.3 (2005), p. 033817.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.72.033817

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.72.033817 2005

  9. [11]

    Resolving the time when an electron exits a tunnelling barrier

    D. Shafir et al. “Resolving the time when an electron exits a tunnelling barrier”. In:Nature485.7398 (2012), pp. 343–346.doi:10.1038/nature11025

    work page doi:10.1038/nature11025 2012

  10. [12]

    Probing the Spatial Structure of a Molecular Attosecond Electron Wave Packet Using Shaped Recollision Trajectories

    H. Niikura et al. “Probing the Spatial Structure of a Molecular Attosecond Electron Wave Packet Using Shaped Recollision Trajectories”. In:Physical Review Letters107.9 (2011), p. 093004.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.093004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.093004 2011

  11. [13]

    Atomic wavefunctions probed through strong-field light–matter interaction

    D. Shafir et al. “Atomic wavefunctions probed through strong-field light–matter interaction”. In:Nature Physics5.6 (2009), pp. 412–416.doi:10 . 1038 / nphys1251

    2009

  12. [14]

    Towards enabling femtosecond helicity-dependent spectroscopy with high-harmonic sources

    G. Lambert et al. “Towards enabling femtosecond helicity-dependent spectroscopy with high-harmonic sources”. In:Nature Communications6.6167 (2015), pp. 1–6. doi:10.1038/ncomms7167

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms7167 2015

  13. [15]

    Trajectory Selection in High Harmonic Generation by Controlling the Phase between Orthogonal Two-Color Fields

    L. Brugnera et al. “Trajectory Selection in High Harmonic Generation by Controlling the Phase between Orthogonal Two-Color Fields”. In:Physical Review Letters107.15 (2011), p. 153902.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.153902

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.153902 2011

  14. [16]

    Divergence and efficiency optimization in polarization-controlled two-color high-harmonic generation

    S. D. C. Roscam Abbing et al. “Divergence and efficiency optimization in polarization-controlled two-color high-harmonic generation”. In:Scientific Reports 11.24253 (2021), pp. 1–11.doi:10.1038/s41598-021-03657-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-021-03657-2 2021

  15. [17]

    Determination of Ionization and Tunneling Times in High- Order Harmonic Generation

    J. Zhao and M. Lein. “Determination of Ionization and Tunneling Times in High- Order Harmonic Generation”. In:Physical Review Letters111.4 (2013), p. 043901. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.043901. REFERENCES12

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.043901 2013

  16. [18]

    Chiral Discrimination through Bielliptical High-Harmonic Spectroscopy

    D. Baykusheva and H. J. W¨ orner. “Chiral Discrimination through Bielliptical High-Harmonic Spectroscopy”. In:Phys. Rev. X8.3 (2018), p. 031060.doi:10. 1103/PhysRevX.8.031060

    2018

  17. [19]

    Theory of high-harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields

    M. Lewenstein et al. “Theory of high-harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields”. In:Physical Review A49.3 (1994), pp. 2117–2132.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevA.49.2117

    1994

  18. [20]

    Stains,et al., Anatomy of STEM Teaching in American Universities: A Snapshot from a Large-Scale Observation Study.Science359(6383), 1468–1470 (2018), doi:10.1126/science

    P. Sali` eres et al. “Feynman’s Path-Integral Approach for Intense-Laser-Atom Interactions”. In:Science292.5518 (2001), pp. 902–905.doi:10.1126/science. 108836

    work page doi:10.1126/science 2001

  19. [21]

    High-harmonic generation from hydrogen atoms driven by two-color mutually orthogonal laser fields

    M. Murakami, O. Korobkin, and M. Horbatsch. “High-harmonic generation from hydrogen atoms driven by two-color mutually orthogonal laser fields”. In:Physical Review A88.6 (2013), p. 063419.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.88.063419

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.88.063419 2013

  20. [22]

    Control of threshold enhancements in harmonic generation by atoms in a two-color laser field with orthogonal polarizations

    M. V. Frolov et al. “Control of threshold enhancements in harmonic generation by atoms in a two-color laser field with orthogonal polarizations”. In:Physical Review A93.2 (2016), p. 023430.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.93.023430

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.93.023430 2016

  21. [23]

    Interference effects in two-color high-order harmonic generation

    X. He et al. “Interference effects in two-color high-order harmonic generation”. In: Physical Review A82.3 (2010), p. 033410.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.82.033410

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.82.033410 2010

  22. [24]

    Quantum-orbit analysis of high-order harmonic generation by bicircular field

    D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c. “Quantum-orbit analysis of high-order harmonic generation by bicircular field”. In:Journal of Modern Optics(2019).doi:10.1080/09500340. 2018.1511862

    work page doi:10.1080/09500340 2019

  23. [25]

    Generation of circularly polarized high-order harmonics by two-color coplanar field mixing

    D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, W. Becker, and R. Kopold. “Generation of circularly polarized high-order harmonics by two-color coplanar field mixing”. In:Physical Review A 61.6 (2000), p. 063403.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.61.063403

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.61.063403 2000

  24. [26]

    Spin conservation in high-order- harmonic generation using bicircular fields

    E. Pisanty, S. Sukiasyan, and M. Ivanov. “Spin conservation in high-order- harmonic generation using bicircular fields”. In:Physical Review A90.4 (2014), p. 043829.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.90.043829

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.90.043829 2014

  25. [27]

    Signature of grav ity waves in the polarization of the mi- crowave background

    A. Za¨ ır et al. “Quantum Path Interferences in High-Order Harmonic Generation”. In:Physical Review Letters100.14 (2008), p. 143902.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 100.143902

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2008

  26. [28]

    High-flux source of coherent XUV pulses for user applications

    O. Hort et al. “High-flux source of coherent XUV pulses for user applications”. In:Optics Express27.6 (2019), pp. 8871–8883.doi:10.1364/OE.27.008871

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.27.008871 2019

  27. [29]

    L1 Allegra laser at ELI Beamlines facility as a driver for electron acceleration at 1 kHz repetition rate (Conference Presentation)

    R. Antipenkov et al. “L1 Allegra laser at ELI Beamlines facility as a driver for electron acceleration at 1 kHz repetition rate (Conference Presentation)”. In: High-power, High-energy Lasers and Ultrafast Optical Technologies. SPIE. 2023, PC1257704

    2023

  28. [30]

    Based Syst.294 (2024), 111787

    A. Nayak et al. “Saddle point approaches in strong field physics and generation of attosecond pulses”. In:Physics Reports833 (2019), pp. 1–52.doi:10.1016/j. physrep.2019.10.002. REFERENCES13

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2019

  29. [31]

    Multielectron high harmonic generation: simple man on a complex plane

    O. Smirnova and M. Ivanov. “Multielectron high harmonic generation: simple man on a complex plane”. In:Attosecond and XUV Physics: Ultrafast Dynamics and Spectroscopy. Ed. by T Schultz and M Vrakking. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2014, pp. 201–256. eprint:http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.2413

    work page arXiv 2014

  30. [32]

    Strong-field approximation and its extension for high-order harmonic generation with mid-infrared lasers

    A. Le et al. “Strong-field approximation and its extension for high-order harmonic generation with mid-infrared lasers”. In:J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.49.5 (2016), p. 053001.doi:10.1088/0953-4075/49/5/053001

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/49/5/053001 2016

  31. [33]

    Strong-field approximation in a rotating frame: High-order harmonic emission frompstates in bicircular fields

    E. Pisanty and A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an. “Strong-field approximation in a rotating frame: High-order harmonic emission frompstates in bicircular fields”. In:Phys. Rev. A 96.6 (2017), p. 063401.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.96.063401

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.96.063401 2017

  32. [34]

    X-ray harmonic generation by orthogonally polarized two-color fields: Spectral shape and polarization

    D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c and W. Becker. “X-ray harmonic generation by orthogonally polarized two-color fields: Spectral shape and polarization”. In:Physical Review A100.3 (2019), p. 031401.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.100.031401

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.100.031401 2019

  33. [35]

    Laser-Induced Recollision Phenomena: Interference Resonances at Channel Closings

    S. V. Popruzhenko et al. “Laser-Induced Recollision Phenomena: Interference Resonances at Channel Closings”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.89.2 (2002), p. 023001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.023001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.023001 2002

  34. [36]

    Role of long quantum orbits in high-order harmonic generation

    D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c and W. Becker. “Role of long quantum orbits in high-order harmonic generation”. In:Physical Review A66.6 (2002), p. 063417.doi:10 . 1103/PhysRevA.66.063417

    2002

  35. [37]

    Conditions for the reliable production of attosecond pulses using ultra-short laser-generated high harmonics

    L. E. Chipperfield et al. “Conditions for the reliable production of attosecond pulses using ultra-short laser-generated high harmonics”. In:J. Mod. Opt.52.2–3 (2005), pp. 243–260.doi:10.1080/0950034042000275379

    work page doi:10.1080/0950034042000275379 2005

  36. [38]

    The imaginary part of the high- harmonic cutoff

    E. Pisanty, M. F. Ciappina, and M. Lewenstein. “The imaginary part of the high- harmonic cutoff”. In:Journal of Physics: Photonics2.3 (2020), p. 034013.doi: 10.1088/2515-7647/ab8f1e

    work page doi:10.1088/2515-7647/ab8f1e 2020

  37. [39]

    Spectral caustics in attosecond science

    O. Raz et al. “Spectral caustics in attosecond science”. In:Nature Photonics6.3 (2012), pp. 170–173.doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.353

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.353 2012

  38. [40]

    Negative-travel-time quantum orbits in strong- field ionization by an elliptically polarized laser field

    D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c and W. Becker. “Negative-travel-time quantum orbits in strong- field ionization by an elliptically polarized laser field”. In:Phys. Rev. A105.3 (2022), p. L031103.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.105.L031103

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.105.l031103 2022

  39. [41]

    A universal approach to saddle-point methods in attosecond science

    A. Weber, J. Feldbrugge, and E. Pisanty. “A universal approach to saddle-point methods in attosecond science”. In:arXiv(2025). under review. eprint:2510 . 12545.url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12545

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [42]

    Index formulae for singular lines of polarization

    M. V. Berry. “Index formulae for singular lines of polarization”. In:Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics6.7 (2004), p. 675.doi:10 . 1088 / 1464 - 4258/6/7/003

    2004

  41. [43]

    Selection Rules for the High Harmonic Generation Spectra

    O. E. Alon, V. Averbukh, and N. Moiseyev. “Selection Rules for the High Harmonic Generation Spectra”. In:Physical Review Letters80.17 (1998), pp. 3743–3746.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3743

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.3743 1998