pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12860 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

JWST observations of photodissociation regions. IV. Carbonaceous emission band sub-components in NGC 7023 have distinct spatial distributions

D. Van De Putte (1 , 2) , K. D. Gordon (2 , 3) , K. Misselt (4) , A. N. Witt (5) , A. Abergel (6) , A. Noriega-Crespo (2)
show 22 more authors
P. Guillard (7) M. Zannese (6) M. Elyajouri (2) B. Trahin (2 6) P. Dell'ova (6) M. Baes (3) P. Klaassen (8) ((1) Department of Physics & Astronomy The University of Western Ontario (2) Space Telescope Science Institute (3) Sterrenkundig Observatorium Universiteit Gent (4) Steward Observatory University of Arizona (5) Ritter Astrophysical Research Center University of Toledo (6) Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale Universit\'e Paris-Saclay CNRS (7) Sorbonne Universit\'e Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris (8) United Kingdom Astronomy Technology Centre)
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords JWSTNGC 7023photodissociation regionscarbonaceous emission bandsspatial distributionsPAH emissionfullerenes
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

JWST maps show at least two separate carrier populations produce the 16-18 micron bands in NGC 7023.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes JWST spectroscopy across the northwest filament of NGC 7023 to track how the profiles of carbonaceous emission bands change through a photodissociation region. Using PAHFIT decomposition on spectra covering 3.3 to 17.4 microns, the authors create spatial maps of band intensities and classify features by their relative strength in the atomic hydrogen region versus the main dissociation front. They find that blue and red sub-components of the 5.7, 7.7, 11.3 and 12.7 micron bands exhibit contrasting distributions, which points to multiple emitter populations also operating in the 16-18 micron range. The maps further show these profiles continue to shift toward the central cavity where fullerene emission has been seen.

Core claim

Nearly all emission maps peak at the dissociation front DF1, while relative intensity in the atomic hydrogen region varies strongly by feature. Classification into spatial types shows most bands as type I or II, but blue sub-components of the 5.7, 7.7, 11.3 and 12.7 micron bands are type III while red sub-components are type I or II. These differing distributions demonstrate that at least two distinct populations contribute to the 16-18 micron range and link to the shapes of the main bands, with continued profile evolution toward the central cavity preceding fullerene formation.

What carries the argument

PAHFIT spectral decomposition that isolates the main bands and their blue/red sub-components, followed by mapping of their intensity ratios between the atomic hydrogen region (ATM) and dissociation front (DF1) to classify spatial distribution types.

If this is right

  • The blue sides of the 5.7, 7.7, 11.3 and 12.7 micron bands arise from one population while the red sides arise from another.
  • At least two populations contribute to the 16.4 and 17.4 micron features.
  • The emission profiles continue to evolve inward from the dissociation front toward the central cavity.
  • This evolution occurs in a stage that precedes the appearance of fullerene emission such as C60.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Photochemical processing models may need to track separate carrier groups moving through the same radiation field.
  • Similar two-population behavior could appear in other photodissociation regions if mapped at comparable resolution.
  • Excitation or temperature effects might still contribute to the observed profile shifts even if populations differ.
  • Targeted observations of the central cavity could test whether the inferred populations directly convert into fullerenes.

Load-bearing premise

That the PAHFIT decomposition cleanly isolates physically distinct sub-components rather than artifacts of blending, temperature variations, or template choices, and that intensity ratios directly trace carrier populations instead of excitation or optical depth effects.

What would settle it

If re-decomposition with different templates or higher-resolution data shows the blue and red sub-components of the 5.7-12.7 micron bands having identical spatial maps, the claim of multiple distinct populations would fail.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12860 by 2), (2) Space Telescope Science Institute, 3), (3) Sterrenkundig Observatorium, (4) Steward Observatory, (5) Ritter Astrophysical Research Center, 6), (6) Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale, (7) Sorbonne Universit\'e, (8) United Kingdom Astronomy Technology Centre), A. Abergel (6), A. Noriega-Crespo (2), A. N. Witt (5), B. Trahin (2, CNRS, D. Van De Putte (1, Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, K. D. Gordon (2, K. Misselt (4), M. Baes (3), M. Elyajouri (2), M. Zannese (6), P. Dell'ova (6), P. Guillard (7), P. Klaassen (8) ((1) Department of Physics & Astronomy, The University of Western Ontario, Universiteit Gent, Universit\'e Paris-Saclay, University of Arizona, University of Toledo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left panel: Position of HD200775 relative to the NGC 7023 NW filament and footprints of the NIRSpec observations. The background is the F1130W map from the MIRI imager observations of the same program (Misselt et al. 2025). The dashed rectangle indicates the coverage of Spitzer-based spectroscopy and feature maps (Werner et al. 2004; Shannon et al. 2015), which includes coverage closer to the star, where C… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Zoomed-in view of the emission complexes in the ATM and DF1 regions of NGC 7023, and the corresponding PAHFIT decompositions. The aperture-extracted spectra (defined in Sect. 2 and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Analogous to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Detailed view of the updated decomposition in the 16-18 µm range. The light gray line shows the ATM spectrum, with bumps at 16.7 and 17.2 µm that raise the need for three components to model the cen￾tral “plateau”. The individual Drude profiles (colorful curves and labels) are plotted after adding the continuum components, and the total model is the solid black line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Maps of the individual components of the 5.7 µm band decom￾position. The lower panel is analogous to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Analogous to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Analogous to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Spatial profiles along cuts perpendicular to the DF for selected features, normalized to the peak of each cut. The cuts are organized by spatial distribution types I, II, and III, as introduced in Sect. 4.3. The 17.4 µm cut is shown twice to directly compare it to the type II and type III cuts. The dashed lines in the bottom panel indicate the region over which the maps were median-stacked along the verti… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Maps of ratios describing variations in the band profiles. The color bars represent a linear scale between the minimum and maximum. The ratios represent the relative contributions of sub-components to the total as defined in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Profile diagnostics diagram based on the 6.2 and 7.7 µm profiles, comparing our results for NGC 7023 (colorful circles) with those for the five Orion Bar template spectra (labeled markers, Van De Putte et al. 2025). The color bar indicates the position in the NGC 7023 mosaic and the black marker bar is the location of DF1. In the atomic PDR regime, the NGC 7023 spectra exhibit much more strongly pronounce… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We analyze JWST spectroscopy of the northwest filament of NGC7023, where the relatively soft radiation field results in a photodissociation region with an extended atomic hydrogen region, and strongly pronounced variations of the carbonaceous emission band profiles. We focus on the 16.4 and 17.4 um bands and their relation to the main bands at 3.3, 3.4, 5.2, 5.7, 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, 11.3, and 12.7 um, and aim to identify which bands and sub-features originate from co-spatial emission carriers. We apply a PAHFIT spectral decomposition to measure the emission bands and their individual sub-components, and produce maps that spatially resolve the main dissociation front (DF1). Nearly all emission maps peak at DF1, while the relative intensity in the atomic hydrogen region (ATM) varies strongly. We classify the features into spatial distribution types based on the intensity ratio in ATM relative to DF1. Most bands are of type I (low ATM/DF1; 3.3, 3.4, 5.2, 5.7, 11.3 um) or II (medium ATM/DF1; 16.2, 7.7, 8.6, 12.7, 16.4 um), while only few are of type III (high ATM/DF1; 11.0, 17.4 um). A breakdown of the 5.7, 7.7, 11.3 and 12.7 um bands into blue and red sub-components reveals that contributions on the blue side are of type III, while those on the red side are of type I or II. These strongly differing spatial distributions reveal that at least two different populations contribute to the 16-18 um range, and that these populations are also connected to the profiles of the 5.7, 7.7, 11.3, and 12.7 um bands. The maps further indicate a continued evolution of these profiles toward the central cavity of NGC7023, where fullerene emission (C60) was previously detected. We speculate that the population of emission carriers could be in an intermediate photochemical evolution stage that precedes fullerene formation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes JWST spectroscopy of the northwest filament of NGC 7023, applying PAHFIT decomposition to map the spatial distributions of carbonaceous emission bands (3.3–17.4 μm) and their sub-components relative to the main dissociation front (DF1) and atomic hydrogen region (ATM). Bands and sub-components are classified into spatial types I–III based on ATM/DF1 intensity ratios, with the key finding that blue sub-components of the 5.7, 7.7, 11.3, 12.7, and 16–18 μm features show type-III behavior while red sub-components are type I/II; this is interpreted as evidence for at least two distinct carrier populations in the 16–18 μm range that are also linked to the profiles of other bands, possibly representing an intermediate stage in photochemical evolution toward fullerene formation.

Significance. If the sub-component separation holds, the work supplies valuable spatially resolved observational constraints on the diversity and evolution of PAH carriers in PDRs, extending the JWST PDR series with direct mapping of intensity ratios that can test models of carrier populations. The use of public JWST data and clear production of emission maps are strengths that make the results reproducible and falsifiable in principle.

major comments (2)
  1. Spectral decomposition and mapping section: the classification of blue versus red sub-components (and thus the claim of multiple carrier populations) depends on the fixed PAHFIT templates cleanly isolating independent features. No sensitivity tests to template parameter variations (positions, widths, or relative strengths) or alternative decompositions are described, leaving open whether the reported type-III behavior of blue wings arises from physically distinct populations or from template-driven splitting of continuously varying profiles (cf. reader's weakest assumption and skeptic note).
  2. Results on spatial distributions: the interpretation that ATM/DF1 intensity ratios directly trace separate carrier populations (rather than position-dependent excitation, ionization, or optical-depth gradients) is central but lacks quantitative checks, such as correlations with local radiation field or comparisons to excitation models, which are needed to rule out non-carrier explanations for the differing maps.
minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract and introduction: the description of the type I/II/III classification is clear, but adding a brief note on the exact number of sub-components fitted per band would help readers assess the decomposition scope immediately.
  2. Figure captions (maps): ensure all panels explicitly label the ATM and DF1 regions and include the intensity ratio scale used for classification to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed report. We address each major comment below, outlining how we will strengthen the manuscript through additional analysis and discussion while preserving the core findings.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Spectral decomposition and mapping section: the classification of blue versus red sub-components (and thus the claim of multiple carrier populations) depends on the fixed PAHFIT templates cleanly isolating independent features. No sensitivity tests to template parameter variations (positions, widths, or relative strengths) or alternative decompositions are described, leaving open whether the reported type-III behavior of blue wings arises from physically distinct populations or from template-driven splitting of continuously varying profiles (cf. reader's weakest assumption and skeptic note).

    Authors: We acknowledge the importance of demonstrating robustness against template choices. The PAHFIT templates were selected for consistency with prior decompositions of NGC 7023 and other PDRs in the literature. To directly address this concern, we will add a new subsection performing sensitivity tests: we will vary the central positions and widths of the sub-components by ±5–10% (within observed profile uncertainties) and re-derive the ATM/DF1 ratios and spatial types. We will also test an alternative decomposition using unconstrained Gaussians for the 5.7, 7.7, 11.3, and 12.7 μm complexes. Results confirming that the type-III classification of blue sub-components persists will be presented, with any caveats noted. These additions will appear in the revised spectral decomposition section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results on spatial distributions: the interpretation that ATM/DF1 intensity ratios directly trace separate carrier populations (rather than position-dependent excitation, ionization, or optical-depth gradients) is central but lacks quantitative checks, such as correlations with local radiation field or comparisons to excitation models, which are needed to rule out non-carrier explanations for the differing maps.

    Authors: The opposing spatial behaviors of blue and red sub-components within the same band already argue against a simple excitation or ionization gradient explanation, since such effects would not produce wavelength-dependent reversals over such narrow ranges. Nevertheless, we agree that explicit checks are valuable. In the revision we will add: (1) maps and correlations of the ATM/DF1 ratios against local radiation field strength estimated from the 5–20 μm continuum; (2) a comparison of the observed sub-component ratios to predictions from existing PDR excitation models for NGC 7023 (e.g., those incorporating varying G0 and density). This discussion will be placed in the Results and Interpretation sections to clarify why multiple carrier populations remain the most parsimonious explanation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is direct from JWST data maps

full rationale

The paper's central result follows from applying the standard PAHFIT decomposition to the observed JWST spectra, extracting intensities for main bands and their blue/red sub-components, constructing spatial maps across the PDR, and classifying features by the empirical ATM/DF1 intensity ratio. The conclusion that at least two populations contribute to the 16-18 um range (and link to other bands) is a direct reading of the differing ratio values for blue vs. red sub-components. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or self-citation chain; the classification and population inference are data-driven outputs with no load-bearing self-reference or ansatz smuggling. This is a standard observational analysis against external JWST measurements.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis assumes standard PAH-like emission carriers and that PAHFIT templates accurately represent the underlying band shapes without introducing spurious sub-components. No new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • PAHFIT template parameters (positions, widths, relative strengths)
    Band decomposition requires choosing or fitting multiple template parameters for each sub-component; these are not derived from first principles in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Emission bands arise from distinct molecular or dust populations whose spatial distributions reflect photochemical evolution.
    Invoked when interpreting differing ATM/DF1 ratios as evidence for separate carriers rather than excitation effects.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5970 in / 1362 out tokens · 22268 ms · 2026-05-10T15:04:12.992894+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    J., Hudgins, D

    Allamandola, L. J., Hudgins, D. M., & Sandford, S. A. 1999, ApJ, 511, L115

    work page 1999

  2. [2]

    J., Tielens, A

    Allamandola, L. J., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Barker, J. R. 1985, ApJ, 290, L25 3 http://www.astropy.org Article number, page 16 D. Van De Putte et al.: Carbonaceous emission band sub-components in NGC 7023 have distinct spatial distributions

    work page 1985

  3. [3]

    J., Tielens, A

    Allamandola, L. J., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Barker, J. R. 1989, ApJS, 71, 733

    work page 1989

  4. [4]

    W., et al

    Andrews, H., Boersma, C., Werner, M. W., et al. 2015, ApJ, 807, 99 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    W., Peeters, E., & Allamandola, L

    Bauschlicher, Jr., C. W., Peeters, E., & Allamandola, L. J. 2008, ApJ, 678, 316

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    W., Ricca, A., Boersma, C., & Allamandola, L

    Bauschlicher, Jr., C. W., Ricca, A., Boersma, C., & Allamandola, L. J. 2018, ApJS, 234, 32

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    2012, ApJ, 757, 41 Berné, O., Habart, É., Peeters, E., et al

    Bernard-Salas, J., Cami, J., Peeters, E., et al. 2012, ApJ, 757, 41 Berné, O., Habart, É., Peeters, E., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 054301 Berné, O., Joblin, C., Deville, Y ., et al. 2007, A&A, 469, 575 Berné, O., Montillaud, J., & Joblin, C. 2015, A&A, 577, A133 Berné, O. & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 109, 401

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    J., Esposito, V

    Boersma, C., Allamandola, L. J., Esposito, V . J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 959, 74

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    W., Allamandola, L

    Boersma, C., Bauschlicher, C. W., Allamandola, L. J., et al. 2010, A&A, 511, A32

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    Boersma, C., Bregman, J., & Allamandola, L. J. 2014, ApJ, 795, 110

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    Boersma, C., Bregman, J., & Allamandola, L. J. 2015, ApJ, 806, 121

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    D., & Allamandola, L

    Boersma, C., Bregman, J. D., & Allamandola, L. J. 2013, ApJ, 769, 117

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    L., Bauschlicher, Jr., C

    Boersma, C., Mattioda, A. L., Bauschlicher, Jr., C. W., et al. 2009, ApJ, 690, 1208

    work page 2009

  14. [14]

    & Temi, P

    Bregman, J. & Temi, P. 2005, ApJ, 621, 831

    work page 2005

  15. [15]

    Cami, J., Bernard-Salas, J., Peeters, E., & Malek, S. E. 2010, Science, 329, 1180

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    & Sarre, P

    Candian, A. & Sarre, P. J. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 2960

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Chokshi, A., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Werner, M. W., & Castelaz, M. W. 1988, ApJ, 334, 803

    work page 1988

  18. [18]

    2024, A&A, 685, A75

    Chown, R., Sidhu, A., Peeters, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A75

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    A., Candian, A., Berné, O., & Tielens, A

    Croiset, B. A., Candian, A., Berné, O., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2016, A&A, 590, A26

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    Draine, B. T. 1978, ApJS, 36, 595

    work page 1978

  21. [21]

    Duley, W. W. & Hu, A. 2012, ApJ, 745, L11

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    E., & McCandliss, S

    Fleming, B., France, K., Lupu, R. E., & McCandliss, S. R. 2010, ApJ, 725, 159

    work page 2010

  23. [23]

    C., Tielens, A

    Galliano, F., Madden, S. C., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Peeters, E., & Jones, A. P. 2008, ApJ, 679, 310 García-Hernández, D. A., Manchado, A., García-Lario, P., et al. 2010, ApJ, 724, L39

    work page 2008

  24. [24]

    M., Teyssier, D., & Pety, J

    Habart, E., Abergel, A., Walmsley, C. M., Teyssier, D., & Pety, J. 2005, A&A, 437, 177

    work page 2005

  25. [25]

    Habing, H. J. 1968, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherlands, 19, 421

    work page 1968

  26. [26]

    Hollenbach, D. J. & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1997, ARA&A, 35, 179

    work page 1997

  27. [27]

    Hollenbach, D. J. & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1999, Reviews of Modern Physics, 71, 173

    work page 1999

  28. [28]

    2001, A&A, 370, 1030

    Hony, S., Van Kerckhoven, C., Peeters, E., et al. 2001, A&A, 370, 1030

    work page 2001

  29. [29]

    Hudgins, D. M. & Allamandola, L. J. 1999, ApJ, 516, L41

    work page 1999

  30. [30]

    A., Leccese, M., Simonsen, F

    Jensen, P. A., Leccese, M., Simonsen, F. D. S., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 5492

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    2025, A&A, 699, A133 Köhler, M., Habart, E., Arab, H., et al

    Khan, B., Abbott, B., Peeters, E., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A133 Köhler, M., Habart, E., Arab, H., et al. 2014, A&A, 569, A109

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    & Puget, J

    Leger, A. & Puget, J. L. 1984, A&A, 137, L5

    work page 1984

  33. [33]

    J., Candian, A., Lee, T

    Mackie, C. J., Candian, A., Lee, T. J., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2022, The journal of physical chemistry. A, 126, 3198—3209

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    J., Peeters, E., Bauschlicher, C

    Mackie, C. J., Peeters, E., Bauschlicher, C. W., J., & Cami, J. 2015, ApJ, 799, 131

    work page 2015

  35. [35]

    PDRs4All: XVIII. The evolution of the PAH ionisation and PAH size distribution across the Orion Bar

    Maragkoudakis, A., Boersma, C., Peeters, E., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.23282

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    Marconi, A., Testi, L., Natta, A., & Walmsley, C. M. 1998, A&A, 330, 696

    work page 1998

  37. [37]

    L., Hudgins, D

    Mattioda, A. L., Hudgins, D. M., Boersma, C., et al. 2020, ApJS, 251, 22

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    R., Jones, A

    Micelotta, E. R., Jones, A. P., Cami, J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 761, 35

    work page 2012

  39. [39]

    N., Gordon, K

    Misselt, K., Witt, A. N., Gordon, K. D., et al. 2025, A&A, 700, A158

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    2013, A&A, 552, A15

    Montillaud, J., Joblin, C., & Toublanc, D. 2013, A&A, 552, A15

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    S., Akimkin, V

    Murga, M. S., Akimkin, V . V ., & Wiebe, D. S. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 3732

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    W., Allamandola, L

    Peeters, E., Bauschlicher, Jr., C. W., Allamandola, L. J., et al. 2017, ApJ, 836, 198

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    2024, A&A, 685, A74

    Peeters, E., Habart, E., Berné, O., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A74

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    2002, A&A, 390, 1089

    Peeters, E., Hony, S., Van Kerckhoven, C., et al. 2002, A&A, 390, 1089

    work page 2002

  45. [45]

    L., Hudgins, D

    Peeters, E., Mattioda, A. L., Hudgins, D. M., & Allamandola, L. J. 2004, ApJ, 617, L65

    work page 2004

  46. [46]

    Peeters, E., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Allamandola, L. J., & Wolfire, M. G. 2012, ApJ, 747, 44

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    2012, A&A, 542, A69

    Pilleri, P., Montillaud, J., Berné, O., & Joblin, C. 2012, A&A, 542, A69

    work page 2012

  48. [48]

    2005, A&A, 429, 193

    Rapacioli, M., Joblin, C., & Boissel, P. 2005, A&A, 429, 193

    work page 2005

  49. [49]

    & Hornekær, L

    Rauls, E. & Hornekær, L. 2008, ApJ, 679, 531

    work page 2008

  50. [50]

    W., Boersma, C., Tielens, A

    Ricca, A., Bauschlicher, Jr., C. W., Boersma, C., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Alla- mandola, L. J. 2012, ApJ, 754, 75

    work page 2012

  51. [51]

    W., Mattioda, A

    Ricca, A., Bauschlicher, Jr., C. W., Mattioda, A. L., Boersma, C., & Allaman- dola, L. J. 2010, ApJ, 709, 42

    work page 2010

  52. [52]

    Rosenberg, M. J. F., Berné, O., Boersma, C., Allamandola, L. J., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2011, A&A, 532, A128

    work page 2011

  53. [53]

    I., & Werner, M

    Sellgren, K., Uchida, K. I., & Werner, M. W. 2007, ApJ, 659, 1338

    work page 2007

  54. [54]

    W., Ingalls, J

    Sellgren, K., Werner, M. W., Ingalls, J. G., et al. 2010, ApJ, 722, L54

    work page 2010

  55. [55]

    Shannon, M. J. & Boersma, C. 2019, ApJ, 871, 124

    work page 2019

  56. [56]

    J., Stock, D

    Shannon, M. J., Stock, D. J., & Peeters, E. 2015, ApJ, 811, 153

    work page 2015

  57. [57]

    J., Stock, D

    Shannon, M. J., Stock, D. J., & Peeters, E. 2016, ApJ, 824, 111

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    2022, MNRAS, 511, 2186

    Sidhu, A., Bazely, J., Peeters, E., & Cami, J. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 2186

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    Sidhu, A., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Peeters, E., & Cami, J. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 3227

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    K., Anand, R

    Singh, A. K., Anand, R. K., & Rastogi, S. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.11407

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    C., Jura, M., Duley, W

    Sloan, G. C., Jura, M., Duley, W. W., et al. 2007, ApJ, 664, 1144

    work page 2007

  62. [62]

    Smith, J. D. T., Draine, B. T., Dale, D. A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 656, 770

    work page 2007

  63. [63]

    J., Choi, W

    Stock, D. J., Choi, W. D. Y ., Moya, L. G. V ., et al. 2016, ApJ, 819, 65

    work page 2016

  64. [64]

    Stock, D. J. & Peeters, E. 2017, ApJ, 837, 129

    work page 2017

  65. [65]

    D., Jørgensen, B., Friis, E

    Thrower, J. D., Jørgensen, B., Friis, E. E., et al. 2012, ApJ, 752, 3 Van De Putte, D., Meshaka, R., Trahin, B., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A86 Van De Putte, D., Peeters, E., Gordon, K. D., et al. 2025, A&A, 701, A111 van Diedenhoven, B., Peeters, E., Van Kerckhoven, C., et al. 2004, ApJ, 611, 928 Van Kerckhoven, C., Hony, S., Peeters, E., et al. 2000, A&A, 357, 1013

    work page 2012

  66. [66]

    W., Uchida, K

    Werner, M. W., Uchida, K. I., Sellgren, K., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 309

    work page 2004

  67. [67]

    G., Vallini, L., & Chevance, M

    Wolfire, M. G., Vallini, L., & Chevance, M. 2022, ARA&A, 60, 247

    work page 2022

  68. [68]

    M., Linnartz, H., & Tielens, A

    Zhen, J., Castellanos, P., Paardekooper, D. M., Linnartz, H., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2014, ApJ, 797, L30 Article number, page 17 A&A proofs:manuscript no. aa58975-26 Appendix A: Overview of all maps For completeness, in Fig. A.1, we illustrate the spatial distribu- tion of the dust continuum emission as derived from the PAHFIT results. The results themsel...

    work page 2014