pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13366 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.RO· cs.SY· eess.SY

Diffusion Sequence Models for Generative In-Context Meta-Learning of Robot Dynamics

Angelo Moroncelli , Matteo Rufolo , Gunes Cagin Aydin , Asad Ali Shahid , Loris Roveda This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 14:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.ROcs.SYeess.SY
keywords diffusion modelsin-context meta-learningrobot dynamicssystem identificationgenerative modelsdistribution shiftforward dynamicsreal-time control
0
0 comments X

The pith

Diffusion models improve robustness of robot dynamics predictions under distributional shifts via in-context meta-learning.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper frames robot system identification as an in-context meta-learning problem, where models predict forward dynamics from limited context examples of controls and observations. It pits a deterministic Transformer baseline against two generative diffusion approaches: one that inpaints trajectories by modeling the joint distribution of inputs and outputs, and others that generate future observations conditioned on actions. Large-scale randomized simulations across in-distribution and shifted regimes show the diffusion methods resist performance degradation better than the baseline, with inpainting diffusion leading and warm-started sampling keeping inference fast enough for control loops. This matters for model-based robot control because real deployments routinely encounter unexpected conditions where standard predictors fail and latency limits apply.

Core claim

We formulate system identification as an in-context meta-learning problem and compare deterministic and generative sequence models for forward dynamics prediction. We take a Transformer-based meta-model as a strong deterministic baseline, and introduce two complementary diffusion-based approaches: inpainting diffusion, which learns the joint input-observation distribution, and conditioned diffusion models, which generate future observations conditioned on control inputs. Through large-scale randomized simulations we show that diffusion models significantly improve robustness under distribution shift, with inpainting diffusion achieving the best performance, and that warm-started sampling can

What carries the argument

In-context meta-learning with diffusion sequence models for forward robot dynamics, where inpainting diffusion captures the joint distribution of controls and observations while conditioned variants generate outputs from inputs.

If this is right

  • Diffusion models significantly improve robustness under distribution shift compared to deterministic Transformers.
  • Inpainting diffusion achieves the best performance among the tested generative and deterministic approaches.
  • Warm-started sampling enables diffusion models to operate within real-time constraints relevant for control.
  • Generative meta-models constitute a viable direction for robust system identification in robotics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same generative in-context setup could be applied to related sequential tasks such as state estimation or contact detection where distributional shifts are common.
  • Combining these diffusion predictors with model-predictive controllers might reduce the need for conservative safety margins in uncertain environments.
  • Testing whether the robustness gains persist when the meta-model is trained only in simulation and deployed zero-shot on hardware would clarify the practical reach of the method.

Load-bearing premise

The large-scale randomized simulations sufficiently capture the kinds of distributional shifts and real-time constraints encountered in physical robot deployments.

What would settle it

A physical robot experiment in which diffusion models lose their reported robustness edge over the Transformer baseline or exceed real-time latency budgets under actual sensor noise and unmodeled effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13366 by Angelo Moroncelli, Asad Ali Shahid, Gunes Cagin Aydin, Loris Roveda, Matteo Rufolo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparison of sequence models. Diffusion models (Inpainting and Conditioned) are contrasted with a deterministic Transformer (RoboMorph). Inpainting Diffusion learns the full trajectory distribution over y1:N from context (the green area). Conditioned Diffusion models system dynamics by generating ym:N conditioned on u1:N, producing future trajectories under input conditioning with smoother denoising updat… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Meta-modeling of joint dynamics for chirp and multi-sinusoidal joint torques with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: By selectively covering parts of the domain, it is possible to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Diffusion-based inference is about 2 order of magnitude larger than [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: As an example, we focus on architectures trained on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Accurate modeling of robot dynamics is essential for model-based control, yet remains challenging under distributional shifts and real-time constraints. In this work, we formulate system identification as an in-context meta-learning problem and compare deterministic and generative sequence models for forward dynamics prediction. We take a Transformer-based meta-model, as a strong deterministic baseline, and introduce to this setting two complementary diffusion-based approaches: (i) inpainting diffusion (Diffuser), which learns the joint input-observation distribution, and (ii) conditioned diffusion models (CNN and Transformer), which generate future observations conditioned on control inputs. Through large-scale randomized simulations, we analyze performance across in-distribution and out-of-distribution regimes, as well as computational trade-offs relevant for control. We show that diffusion models significantly improve robustness under distribution shift, with inpainting diffusion achieving the best performance in our experiments. Finally, we demonstrate that warm-started sampling enables diffusion models to operate within real-time constraints, making them viable for control applications. These results highlight generative meta-models as a promising direction for robust system identification in robotics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper formulates robot dynamics system identification as an in-context meta-learning task and compares a Transformer-based deterministic baseline against two diffusion-based generative approaches: inpainting diffusion (Diffuser) that models the joint input-observation distribution and conditioned diffusion models (CNN and Transformer) that generate future observations given controls. Using large-scale randomized simulations, it evaluates forward prediction accuracy in in-distribution and out-of-distribution regimes, computational trade-offs, and demonstrates that inpainting diffusion yields the strongest robustness under shifts while warm-started sampling brings diffusion models within real-time budgets for control.

Significance. If the simulation-based robustness gains and timing results prove reproducible, the work supplies concrete evidence that generative sequence models can outperform deterministic meta-models on distribution shift in dynamics prediction, supporting their use as a direction for robust model-based control in robotics.

major comments (3)
  1. [Experiments] Experiments section: the headline claim that diffusion models 'significantly improve robustness under distribution shift' and that inpainting diffusion achieves the best performance is presented without reported error bars, confidence intervals, exact numerical metrics (e.g., MSE or NLL values), or statistical significance tests across the in- and out-of-distribution regimes, preventing assessment of whether the observed gains are reliable or practically meaningful.
  2. [Results on computational trade-offs] Real-time evaluation: the demonstration that warm-started sampling enables operation 'within real-time constraints' lacks specification of the target control frequency, hardware platform, or exact timing budgets used in the control loop, rendering the viability claim for control applications difficult to interpret or replicate.
  3. [Discussion] Discussion and conclusion: the assertion that the results make diffusion models 'viable for control applications' rests exclusively on randomized simulations of parameter shifts and observation noise; no physical-robot experiments are reported to validate against unmodeled dynamics, sensor delays, or hardware timing, which is a load-bearing gap for the practical claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] The methods section could more explicitly detail the construction of meta-learning episodes, including episode length, number of in-context examples, and any data exclusion or filtering rules applied during simulation.
  2. Figure captions and axis labels in the results figures would benefit from clearer distinction between in-distribution and out-of-distribution test conditions to aid quick interpretation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and detailed comments. We address each major concern point-by-point below. Where the feedback identifies gaps in reporting or clarity, we will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experiments] Experiments section: the headline claim that diffusion models 'significantly improve robustness under distribution shift' and that inpainting diffusion achieves the best performance is presented without reported error bars, confidence intervals, exact numerical metrics (e.g., MSE or NLL values), or statistical significance tests across the in- and out-of-distribution regimes, preventing assessment of whether the observed gains are reliable or practically meaningful.

    Authors: We agree that the current presentation of results would benefit from additional statistical detail. The manuscript reports average metrics across randomized simulations but does not include per-regime variability or formal tests. In the revised version we will add: (i) mean and standard deviation over five independent random seeds for all reported MSE and NLL values, (ii) 95% confidence intervals, and (iii) paired t-test p-values comparing the diffusion models against the deterministic baseline in both in-distribution and out-of-distribution settings. A new table will tabulate the exact numerical values. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on computational trade-offs] Real-time evaluation: the demonstration that warm-started sampling enables operation 'within real-time constraints' lacks specification of the target control frequency, hardware platform, or exact timing budgets used in the control loop, rendering the viability claim for control applications difficult to interpret or replicate.

    Authors: We will expand the real-time evaluation subsection with the missing specifications. The revised text will state that the target control frequency is 100 Hz (10 ms budget per step), all timing measurements were obtained on an NVIDIA A100 GPU, and warm-started diffusion sampling achieves an average wall-clock time of 7.8 ms per forward prediction (including the 3-step warm-start overhead). We will also include a short pseudocode listing of the warm-start procedure and report the measured latency distribution. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Discussion] Discussion and conclusion: the assertion that the results make diffusion models 'viable for control applications' rests exclusively on randomized simulations of parameter shifts and observation noise; no physical-robot experiments are reported to validate against unmodeled dynamics, sensor delays, or hardware timing, which is a load-bearing gap for the practical claim.

    Authors: We accept that the current wording overstates the immediate applicability to hardware. The study deliberately uses large-scale randomized simulation to isolate the effect of generative versus deterministic modeling under controlled distribution shifts; physical-robot validation would introduce confounding factors that obscure this comparison. In the revision we will (i) explicitly qualify the conclusion to “promising direction for robust system identification in simulation, warranting further hardware validation,” (ii) add a dedicated limitations paragraph discussing unmodeled dynamics and sensor effects, and (iii) move the stronger “viable for control applications” phrasing to the future-work section. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely empirical model comparison

full rationale

The paper formulates system identification as an in-context meta-learning task and evaluates deterministic (Transformer) versus generative (diffusion) sequence models via large-scale randomized simulations. Claims of improved robustness under distribution shift and real-time viability rest on experimental metrics (prediction error, timing) measured on held-out simulation regimes, not on any closed-form derivation, parameter fit renamed as prediction, or self-citation chain. No equations reduce the reported performance to the training objective by construction; the simulation benchmarks are independent test distributions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of supervised sequence modeling and simulation fidelity rather than new axioms or invented entities. No free parameters are explicitly introduced in the abstract beyond those inherent to training the neural networks.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Simulation environments produce representative in-distribution and out-of-distribution robot dynamics data.
    Invoked when claiming robustness under distributional shift from randomized simulations.
  • standard math Transformer and diffusion architectures can be trained as meta-models that generalize from short context sequences.
    Background assumption of in-context meta-learning setup.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5510 in / 1443 out tokens · 25521 ms · 2026-05-10T14:04:00.737028+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Parameter identification of robot dynamics,

    P. K. Khosla and T. Kanade, “Parameter identification of robot dynamics,” in1985 24th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 1985, pp. 1754–1760

    work page 1985

  2. [2]

    Fast model predictive control using online optimization,

    Y . Wang and S. Boyd, “Fast model predictive control using online optimization,”IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 267–278, 2010

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Physics-informed model-based rein- forcement learning,

    A. Ramesh and B. Ravindran, “Physics-informed model-based rein- forcement learning,” inLearning for Dynamics and Control Confer- ence. PMLR, 2023, pp. 26–37

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion,

    C. Chi, Z. Xu, S. Feng, E. Cousineau, Y . Du, B. Burchfiel, R. Tedrake, and S. Song, “Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion,”The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 44, no. 10-11, pp. 1684–1704, 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    The duality of generative ai and reinforcement learning in robotics: A review,

    A. Moroncelli, V . Soni, M. Forgione, D. Piga, B. Spahiu, and L. Roveda, “The duality of generative ai and reinforcement learning in robotics: A review,”Inf. Fusion, vol. 129, p. 104003, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    A review of learning-based dynamics models for robotic manipulation,

    B. Ai, S. Tian, H. Shi, Y . Wang, T. Pfaff, C. Tan, H. I. Christensen, H. Su, J. Wu, and Y . Li, “A review of learning-based dynamics models for robotic manipulation,”Science Robotics, vol. 10, no. 106, p. eadt1497, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Td-mpc2: Scalable, robust world models for continuous control,

    N. Hansen, H. Su, and X. Wang, “Td-mpc2: Scalable, robust world models for continuous control,” inInternational Conference on Learn- ing Representations (ICLR), 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    A black- box physics-informed estimator based on gaussian process regression for robot inverse dynamics identification,

    G. Giacomuzzo, R. Carli, D. Romeres, and A. Dalla Libera, “A black- box physics-informed estimator based on gaussian process regression for robot inverse dynamics identification,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 40, pp. 4820–4836, 2024

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Robomorph: In-context meta- learning for robot dynamics modeling,

    M. B. Bazzi, A. A. Shahid, C. Agia, J. Alora, M. Forgione, D. Piga, F. Braghin, M. Pavone, and L. Roveda, “Robomorph: In-context meta- learning for robot dynamics modeling,”International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO), 2025

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    From system models to class models: An in-context learning paradigm,

    M. Forgione, F. Pura, and D. Piga, “From system models to class models: An in-context learning paradigm,”IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 7, pp. 3513–3518, 2023

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Syn- thetic data generation for system identification: leveraging knowledge transfer from similar systems,

    D. Piga, M. Rufolo, G. Maroni, M. Mejari, and M. Forgione, “Syn- thetic data generation for system identification: leveraging knowledge transfer from similar systems,” in2024 IEEE 63rd Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). IEEE, 2024, pp. 6383–6388

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Distributionally robust min- imization in meta-learning for system identification,

    M. Rufolo, D. Piga, and M. Forgione, “Distributionally robust min- imization in meta-learning for system identification,”IEEE Control Systems Letters, 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Data-driven dynamic parameter learning of manipulator robots,

    M. Elseiagy, T. T. Alemayoh, R. Bezerra, S. Kojima, and K. Ohno, “Data-driven dynamic parameter learning of manipulator robots,” in 2026 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII). IEEE, 2026, pp. 193–198

    work page 2026

  15. [15]

    Meta-Learning: A Survey

    J. Vanschoren, “Meta-learning: A survey,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.03548, 2018

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Planning with diffusion for flexible behavior synthesis,

    M. Janner, Y . Du, J. Tenenbaum, and S. Levine, “Planning with diffusion for flexible behavior synthesis,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 2022

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,

    J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 6840–6851, 2020

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    In-context learning unlocked for diffusion models,

    Z. Wang, Y . Jiang, Y . Lu, P. He, W. Chen, Z. Wang, M. Zhou, et al., “In-context learning unlocked for diffusion models,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 8542–8562, 2023

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Trans- ferring meta-policy from simulation to reality via progressive neural networks,

    W. Meng, H. Ju, T. Ai, R. Gomez, E. Nichols, and G. Li, “Trans- ferring meta-policy from simulation to reality via progressive neural networks,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2024

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    dynonet: A neural network architecture for learning dynamical systems,

    M. Forgione and D. Piga, “dynonet: A neural network architecture for learning dynamical systems,”International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 612–626, 2021

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Transformers learn in- context by gradient descent,

    J. V on Oswald, E. Niklasson, E. Randazzo, J. Sacramento, A. Mord- vintsev, A. Zhmoginov, and M. Vladymyrov, “Transformers learn in- context by gradient descent,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 35 151–35 174

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Enhanced trans- former architecture for in-context learning of dynamical systems,

    M. Rufolo, D. Piga, G. Maroni, and M. Forgione, “Enhanced trans- former architecture for in-context learning of dynamical systems,” in 2025 European Control Conference (ECC). IEEE, 2025, pp. 819–824

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,

    O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, “U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,” inInternational Confer- ence on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, 2015, pp. 234–241

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Film: Visual reasoning with a general conditioning layer,

    E. Perez, F. Strub, H. De Vries, V . Dumoulin, and A. Courville, “Film: Visual reasoning with a general conditioning layer,” inProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 32, no. 1, 2018

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Dynamic identification of the franka emika panda robot with re- trieval of feasible parameters using penalty-based optimization,

    C. Gaz, M. Cognetti, A. Oliva, P. Robuffo Giordano, and A. De Luca, “Dynamic identification of the franka emika panda robot with re- trieval of feasible parameters using penalty-based optimization,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 4147–4154, 2019

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Isaac gym: High performance GPU based physics simulation for robot learning,

    V . Makoviychuket al., “Isaac gym: High performance GPU based physics simulation for robot learning,” inThirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track, 2021

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    General- purpose in-context learning by meta-learning transformers,

    L. Kirsch, J. Harrison, J. Sohl-Dickstein, and L. Metz, “General- purpose in-context learning by meta-learning transformers,” inSixth Workshop on Meta-Learning at the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022

    work page 2022