pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13375 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Recognition: unknown

Photoemission and absorption under coherent and entangled-photon-pair illumination

Malvin Carl Teich , Mark C. Booth , Francesco Lissandrin , Bahaa E. A. Saleh
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 13:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics
keywords entangled photonstwo-photon photoemissionentangled two-photon absorptionsubthreshold photoemissionchannel photomultiplierquantum opticsFermi-tail photoemission
0
0 comments X

The pith

Entangled two-photon photoemission and absorption match quantum models when classical contributions are suppressed by channel photomultipliers and low intensity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews subthreshold photoemission and absorption under coherent light versus entangled photon pairs. It identifies three parallel forms for both emission and absorption: one-photon Fermi-tail processes, two-photon processes, and entangled two-photon processes. Experiments on photocathodes show that channel photomultipliers suppress Fermi-tail photoemission while low intensity minimizes ordinary two-photon photoemission, allowing entangled effects to be isolated. Quantum models of these entangled processes agree with the measured photocurrents and count rates. The same framework applies to absorption, supporting applications in fluorescence microscopy and spectroscopy.

Core claim

The central claim is that entangled-two-photon photoemission (ETPP) from CsK2Sb in a channel photomultiplier is observable under entangled-pair illumination once one-photon Fermi-tail photoemission is suppressed by the CPM and ordinary two-photon photoemission is minimized by low intensity. Quantum models of two-photon photoemission and ETPP match experimental data. Parallel quantum models describe entangled-two-photon absorption (ETPA), enabling applications in entangled-two-photon fluorescence microscopy and spectroscopy.

What carries the argument

The classification of subthreshold processes into singleton-induced Boltzmann-tail, cousin-induced or pair-induced two-photon, and twin-induced entangled two-photon mechanisms, treated with both heuristic particle models and fully quantum models.

If this is right

  • Quantum models of TPP and ETPP reproduce the observed photocurrents and photoelectron count rates from CsK2Sb and Na photocathodes.
  • A channel photomultiplier combined with low-intensity entangled illumination suppresses FTP and TPP enough to reveal ETPP.
  • ETPA enables entangled-two-photon fluorescence microscopy and spectroscopy with the same suppression logic.
  • The three forms of subthreshold absorption (singleton, cousin-pair, and twin) mirror the photoemission forms exactly.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same suppression strategy could be adapted to other single-photon detectors to test entangled effects in different materials.
  • Varying the degree of entanglement while holding intensity fixed would provide a direct test of the twin-induced term.
  • These low-intensity quantum processes suggest routes to reduced sample damage in biological imaging compared with classical two-photon methods.

Load-bearing premise

That the measured rates under entangled illumination can be attributed to the entangled-pair mechanism rather than residual classical light or unsuppressed noise.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures photocurrent versus illumination intensity or correlation time under entangled-pair conditions and finds the dependence matches classical two-photon or residual one-photon predictions instead of the quantum entangled-pair model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13375 by Bahaa E. A. Saleh, Francesco Lissandrin, Malvin Carl Teich, Mark C. Booth.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The onset of two-photon absorption/photoemission fo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The presence of entangled-two-photon absorption/p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Idealized heuristic energy-band diagrams for vario [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Sketch of a photomultiplier tube (PMT), highlightin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (), on the other hand, the Fermi level lies near midgap, i.e. − ≈ 1 /2, so that the work function is expressed as W = + 1 /2, whereas the ionization energy is given by W = + [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Entangled-two-photon photoelectron count rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Entangled-two-photon photoelectron count rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Total subthreshold photocurrent vs. optical intens [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: ) 2. If the measured mean photocurrent or photoelectron count rate scales linearly with the incident entangled-photon intensity over a given range of values, and has a mag￾nitude greater than the linear photocurrent or photoelectron count rate measured using a coherent source of light over that same range of values, the current represents a combination of singleton-induced Fermi-tail photoemission and ent… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Experimental arrangement for observing Fermi-tail [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Fermi-tail photoemission from CsK2Sb at several temperatures. Doubly log￾arithmic plots of the fundamental component of the photocurrent at the photocathode vs. the mean optical power incident on the PMT faceplate. Data are reported for three temperatures: T = 27 ◦C (triangles), 0 ◦C (squares), and −20 ◦C (circles). Error bars indicate standard deviations for individual data points. The curves incorporate… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Fermi-tail photoemission from CsK2Sb at different wavelengths. Doubly loga￾rithmic plots of the fundamental component of the photocurrent at the photocathode vs. the mean optical power incident on the PMT faceplate at two wavelengths: = 800 nm (circles) and 845 nm (squares). The photocathode is maintained at T = 27 ◦C. Error bars indicate standard deviations for individual data points. The curves incorpor… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Sketch of the interior of a custom PMT designed to all [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Experimental arrangement for measurements of two- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Two-photon photocurrent from Na metal in a speciall [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p056_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Analog-detection experimental arrangement for ob [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Two-photon photocurrents from the CsK2Sb photocathode of a Hamamatsu R464 PMT at different temperatures. The tube was enclosed in a Hamamatsu C4877 thermoelectric housing that allowed the PMT temperature T to be varied. The doubly logarithmic plots display the fundamental components of the photoelectric currents at the photocathode vs. the mean optical power incident on the PMT faceplate. Data are present… view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Two-photon photocurrents from the CsK2Sb photocathode of a Hamamatsu R464 PMT for two different wavelengths. The doubly logarithmic plots display the fundamental components of the photoelectric current at the photocathode vs. the mean optical power incident on the PMT faceplate, which is maintained at T = 27 ◦C. The radiation source was a Ti:sapphire mode-locked laser operating at = 800 nm (circles) or at… view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Digital-detection experimental arrangement for o [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p067_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Fermi-tail photoemission elicited by coherent lig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p069_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: The companion experiment relating to the observati [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p073_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Experimental arrangement for observing entangled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p074_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Sketch of a channel photomultiplier (CPM) capillar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p074_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Entangled-two-photon photoemission (ETPP) and tw [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p077_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Subthreshold absorption rate vs. photon-flux density at an absorber illuminated by entangled-photon pairs (graded red region). As specified in Eq. (118), the total absorption rate comprises three contributions: 1) Boltzmann-tail absorption (BTA) induced by singletons (∝ ); 2) entangled-two-photon absorption (ETPA) induced by twins (∝ T0 ); and 3) two-photon absorption (TPA) induced by inde￾pendent cousins… view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Energy-level diagrams depicting the simultaneous [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p093_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Experimental arrangements for transmission-mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p098_25.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The phenomena of subthreshold photoemission and absorption under coherent and entangled-photon-pair illumination are reviewed, and the generation and properties of entangled-photon pairs are surveyed. Three prominent forms of subthreshold photoemission are examined: one-photon Fermi-tail photoemission (FTP), two-photon photoemission (TPP), and entangled-two-photon photoemission (ETPP). Experimental methods for measuring subthreshold photocurrents and photoelectron count rates are discussed, along with strategies for enhancing selected contributions. Experimental observations of FTP from a CsK$_2$Sb photocathode in a photomultiplier tube (PMT), under both coherent and entangled-photon-pair illumination, are reviewed, and the role of FTP as a noise source in two-photon measurements is elucidated. TPP from Na and CsK$_2$Sb photocathodes in a PMT under classical-light illumination is considered, as are TPP and ETPP from a CsK$_2$Sb photocathode in a channel photomultiplier (CPM) under coherent and entangled-photon-pair illumination. The observation of ETPP is facilitated by the use of a CPM, which suppresses FTP, and by low-intensity illumination, which minimizes TPP. Quantum models of TPP and ETPP accord well with experiment. Entangled-two-photon absorption (ETPA) is analyzed, as are its applications in entangled-two-photon fluorescence microscopy (ETPFM) and entangled-two-photon spectroscopy (ETPS). The three principal forms of subthreshold absorption parallel those of subthreshold photoemission: singleton-induced Boltzmann-tail absorption; cousin-induced/singleton-pair-induced two-photon absorption; and twin-induced ETPA. Heuristic particle and fully quantum models of these processes are compared, and experimental studies of ETPA and ETPFM, together with methods for enhancing their observability, are summarized.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews subthreshold photoemission and absorption under coherent and entangled-photon-pair illumination. It surveys the generation and properties of entangled photon pairs, examines three forms of subthreshold photoemission (FTP, TPP, and ETPP) from photocathodes such as CsK2Sb and Na in PMT and CPM detectors, discusses experimental methods for measuring photocurrents and strategies to enhance selected contributions, reviews observations under both coherent and entangled illumination, notes that ETPP observation is facilitated by CPM suppression of FTP and low-intensity minimization of TPP, states that quantum models of TPP and ETPP accord well with experiment, and analyzes ETPA along with its applications in ETPFM and ETPS, drawing parallels to the photoemission cases.

Significance. If the reviewed experimental attributions hold, the paper provides a useful synthesis of quantum-optical effects in photoemission and absorption, highlighting conditions for isolating entangled-photon contributions and their potential in microscopy and spectroscopy. The comparison of heuristic particle and fully quantum models, together with summaries of experimental studies, could serve as a reference point for the quantum optics community working on subthreshold processes.

major comments (1)
  1. The section reviewing experimental observations of ETPP from a CsK2Sb photocathode in a CPM under coherent and entangled illumination: the claim that ETPP is observed thanks to CPM suppression of FTP and low-intensity minimization of TPP is load-bearing for the central assertion that quantum models accord with experiment and that entangled effects are cleanly isolated. The review does not appear to include new quantitative bounds, side-by-side classical-vs-entangled model fits, or explicit error analysis showing that observed signals exceed residual classical two-photon or imperfectly suppressed FTP contributions at the same mean intensity and spectrum; reliance on prior literature leaves the uniqueness of the entangled attribution open to the concern raised in the stress-test note.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract is lengthy and dense in places; consider condensing the descriptions of the three parallel forms of subthreshold absorption to improve readability while retaining key points.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for identifying this key point about the ETPP attribution in the review. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The section reviewing experimental observations of ETPP from a CsK2Sb photocathode in a CPM under coherent and entangled illumination: the claim that ETPP is observed thanks to CPM suppression of FTP and low-intensity minimization of TPP is load-bearing for the central assertion that quantum models accord with experiment and that entangled effects are cleanly isolated. The review does not appear to include new quantitative bounds, side-by-side classical-vs-entangled model fits, or explicit error analysis showing that observed signals exceed residual classical two-photon or imperfectly suppressed FTP contributions at the same mean intensity and spectrum; reliance on prior literature leaves the uniqueness of the entangled attribution open to the concern raised in the stress-test note.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript is a review and therefore does not contain new experimental data, quantitative bounds, or model fits. The statements on ETPP isolation rest on the experimental conditions and supporting analyses already published in the cited works on CPM-based detection and intensity-dependent measurements. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the relevant section to provide more detailed summaries of those prior error analyses, intensity regimes, suppression factors, and model-to-data comparisons drawn directly from the literature. This makes the evidential basis and the role of the cited studies more explicit. As a review we cannot introduce new fits or bounds, but the added discussion should clarify how the entangled attribution is supported while remaining within the scope of the existing body of work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper presents no new derivations, predictions, or fitted models; circularity score 0

full rationale

This is a review surveying existing literature on subthreshold photoemission (FTP, TPP, ETPP) and absorption (ETPA) under coherent and entangled illumination. The abstract and structure explicitly state that phenomena are 'reviewed,' experimental observations from prior work are summarized, and 'quantum models of TPP and ETPP accord well with experiment' without introducing original equations, parameter fits, or predictions. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce claims to unverified inputs appear. The central attribution of ETPP to entangled pairs via CPM and low intensity is presented as a summary of experimental strategy from the literature, not a new derivation. The paper is self-contained as a review against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review paper, no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors; all content draws from prior literature on quantum optics and photoemission.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5637 in / 1001 out tokens · 29023 ms · 2026-05-10T13:53:34.678105+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Über Elementarakte mit zwei Quantensprüngen [On elementa ry processes with two-quantum transitions],

    M. Göppert-Mayer, “Über Elementarakte mit zwei Quantensprüngen [On elementa ry processes with two-quantum transitions],” Ann. Phys. 9, 273–295 (1931). (Göttinger Dissertation.) https://doi. org/10.1002/andp.19314010303

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.19314010303 1931

  2. [2]

    Stimulated optical radiation in ruby,

    T. H. Maiman, “Stimulated optical radiation in ruby,” Nat ure 187, 493–494 (1960)

    1960

  3. [3]

    G eneration of optical harmonics,

    P . A. Franken, A. E. Hill, C. W. Peters, and G. Weinreich, “G eneration of optical harmonics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 118–119 (1961)

    1961

  4. [4]

    T wo-photon excitation in C aF2:Eu2+ ,

    W. Kaiser and C. G. B. Garrett, “T wo-photon excitation in C aF2:Eu2+ ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 229–231 (1961)

    1961

  5. [5]

    Interactions between light waves in a nonlinear dielectric,

    J. A. Armstrong, N. Bloembergen, J. Ducuing, and P . S. Pers han, “Interactions between light waves in a nonlinear dielectric,” Phys. Rev. 127, 1918–1939 (1962)

    1918

  6. [6]

    Light waves at the bound ary of nonlinear media,

    N. Bloembergen and P . S. Pershan, “Light waves at the bound ary of nonlinear media,” Phys. Rev. 128, 606–622 (1962)

    1962

  7. [7]

    Bloembergen, Nonlinear Optics (W

    N. Bloembergen, Nonlinear Optics (W. A. Benjamin, New Y ork, 1965). (4th ed., World Scientific, Singapore, 1996)

    1965

  8. [8]

    Double-quant um photoelectric emission from sodium metal,

    M. C. Teich, J. M. Schroeer, and G. J. Wolga, “Double-quant um photoelectric emission from sodium metal,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 611–614 (1964)

    1964

  9. [9]

    T wo quantum photoemission and dc photomixin g in sodium,

    M. C. Teich, “T wo quantum photoemission and dc photomixin g in sodium,” Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (1966). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15858946

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.15858946 1966

  10. [10]

    T wo-quantum volume photoele ctric effect in sodium,

    M. C. Teich and G. J. Wolga, “T wo-quantum volume photoele ctric effect in sodium,” Phys. Rev. 171, 809–814 (1968)

    1968

  11. [11]

    T wo-photon pho toelectric effect in Cs 3Sb,

    H. Sonnenberg, H. Heffner, and W. Spicer, “T wo-photon pho toelectric effect in Cs 3Sb,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 5, 95–96 (1964)

    1964

  12. [12]

    B. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics (Wiley, Hoboken, 2019), 3rd ed

    2019

  13. [13]

    Multiphoton optical heterodyne detection ,

    M. C. Teich, “Multiphoton optical heterodyne detection ,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-11, 595–602 (1975)

    1975

  14. [14]

    M. C. Teich and B. E. A. Saleh, Photon Bunching and Antibunching (North-Holland/Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988), vol. 26 of Progress in Optics, chap. 1, pp. 1–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6638 (08)70174-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s0079-6638 1988

  15. [15]

    Squeezed states of light,

    M. C. Teich and B. E. A. Saleh, “Squeezed states of light,” Quantum Opt. J. Eur. Opt. Soc. Part B 1, 153–191 (1989)

    1989

  16. [16]

    Observation of tunable optical parametric fluorescence,

    S. E. Harris, M. K. Oshman, and R. L. Byer, “Observation of tunable optical parametric fluorescence,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 732–735 (1967)

    1967

  17. [17]

    Study in ammonium dihydrogen phosp hate of spontaneous parametric interaction tunable from 4400 to 16 000 Å,

    D. Magde and H. Mahr, “Study in ammonium dihydrogen phosp hate of spontaneous parametric interaction tunable from 4400 to 16 000 Å,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 905–907 (1967). 101

    1967

  18. [18]

    Coherent photon decay in a nonlinear medi um,

    D. N. Klyshko, “Coherent photon decay in a nonlinear medi um,” Sov. Phys. JETP Lett. 6, 23–25 (1967). Originally published in Zhurnal Eksperimental’noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki: Pisma v Redaktsiyu 6, 490–492 (1967)

    1967

  19. [19]

    Quantum theory of spont aneous parametric scattering of intense light,

    T. G. Giallorenzi and C. L. Tang, “Quantum theory of spont aneous parametric scattering of intense light,” Phys. Rev. 166, 225–233 (1968)

    1968

  20. [20]

    Scattering of light in a medium with nonli near polarizability,

    D. N. Klyshko, “Scattering of light in a medium with nonli near polarizability,” Sov. Phys. JETP 28, 522–526 (1969). Originally published in Zhurnal Eksperimental’noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki 55, 1006–1013 (1968)

    1969

  21. [21]

    Observation of simulta neity in parametric production of optical photon pairs,

    D. C. Burnham and D. L. Weinberg, “Observation of simulta neity in parametric production of optical photon pairs,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 84–87 (1970)

    1970

  22. [22]

    Antibunching i n the Franck–Hertz experiment,

    M. C. Teich, B. E. A. Saleh, and D. Stoler, “ Antibunching i n the Franck–Hertz experiment,” Opt. Commun. 46, 244–248 (1983)

    1983

  23. [23]

    Role of primary excitation statistics in the generation of antibunched and sub-Poisson light,

    M. C. Teich, B. E. A. Saleh, and J. Peřina, “Role of primary excitation statistics in the generation of antibunched and sub-Poisson light,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1, 366–389 (1984)

    1984

  24. [24]

    Observation of sub-Poisso n Franck–Hertz light at 253.7 nm,

    M. C. Teich and B. E. A. Saleh, “Observation of sub-Poisso n Franck–Hertz light at 253.7 nm,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2, 275–282 (1985)

    1985

  25. [25]

    Observation of squeezed states generated by four-wave mi xing in an optical cavity,

    R. E. Slusher, L. W. Hollberg, B. Yurke, et al., “Observation of squeezed states generated by four-wave mi xing in an optical cavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2409–2412 (1985). Erratum: 56, 788 (1986)

    1985

  26. [26]

    D. N. Klyshko, Photons and Nonlinear Optics (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New Y ork, 1988). Eng lish translation of the original Russian edition published by Na uka, Moscow, 1980

    1988

  27. [27]

    Transverse photon bunching and two-phot on processes in the field of parametrically scattered light,

    D. N. Klyshko, “Transverse photon bunching and two-phot on processes in the field of parametrically scattered light, ” Sov. Phys. JETP 56, 753–759 (1982). Originally published in Zhurnal Eksperimental’noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki 83, 1313–1323 (1982)

    1982

  28. [28]

    Squeezed and antibunched l ight,

    M. C. Teich and B. E. A. Saleh, “Squeezed and antibunched l ight,” Phys. Today 43 (6), 26–34 (1990). Erratum: 43 (11), 123 (1990)

    1990

  29. [29]

    Entanglement-based quantum information technology: A t utorial,

    Z. Zhang, C. Y ou, O. S. Magaña-Loaiza, et al., “Entanglement-based quantum information technology: A t utorial,” Adv. Opt. Photonics 16, 60–162 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Nonlinear domain engineerin g for quantum technologies,

    T. F. Weiss and A. Peruzzo, “Nonlinear domain engineerin g for quantum technologies,” Appl. Phys. Rev. 12, 011318 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    Advances in position–momentum entanglement: A versatil e tool for quantum technologies,

    S. Patil, R. Swarnkar, J. L. Moos, et al. , “ Advances in position–momentum entanglement: A versatil e tool for quantum technologies,” Laser & Photonics Rev. p. e01358 (20 26). https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202501358

    work page doi:10.1002/lpor.202501358

  32. [32]

    Entanglement-induced two-photon transparency,

    H.-B. Fei, B. M. Jost, S. Popescu, et al. , “Entanglement-induced two-photon transparency,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1679–1682 (1997)

    1997

  33. [33]

    Entangled-photon microsc opy (Mikroskopie s kvantově provázanými fotony),

    M. C. Teich and B. E. A. Saleh, “Entangled-photon microsc opy (Mikroskopie s kvantově provázanými fotony),” Československý časopis pro fyziku 47, 3–8 (1997). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19793959

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.19793959 1997

  34. [34]

    Superbunched bright squeezed vacuum state,

    T. Sh. Iskhakov, A. M. Pérez, K. Yu. Spasibko, et al., “Superbunched bright squeezed vacuum state,” Opt. Lett. 37, 1919–1921 (2012)

    1919

  35. [35]

    Multiphoton effects enhanced due to ultrafast photon- number fluctuations,

    K. Yu. Spasibko, D. A. Kopylov, V . L. Krutyanskiy, et al., “Multiphoton effects enhanced due to ultrafast photon- number fluctuations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 223603 (2017)

    2017

  36. [36]

    Properties of bright squeezed vacuum at increasing brigh tness,

    P . R. Sharapova, G. Frascella, M. Riabinin, et al., “Properties of bright squeezed vacuum at increasing brigh tness,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013371 (2020)

    2020

  37. [37]

    Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quan tenmechanik,

    E. Schrödinger, “Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quan tenmechanik,” Naturwissenschaften 23, 807–812; 823– 828; 844–849 (1935). Translated by J. D. Trimmer, “The prese nt situation in quantum mechanics: A translation of Schrödinger’s ‘cat paradox’ paper,” Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 124, 323–338 (1980). Reprinted in J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek, eds., Quantum ...

    1935

  38. [38]

    Quantum Theory of Measurement

    D. Bohm, Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1951). Chap. 22: “Quantum Theory of Measurement”

    1951

  39. [39]

    On the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox,

    J. S. Bell, “On the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox,” P hysics-Physique-Fizika 1, 195–200 (1964)

    1964

  40. [40]

    Pro posed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories,

    J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, “Pro posed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880–884 (1969). Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 549 (1970)

    1969

  41. [41]

    B. E. A. Saleh, Quantum Photonics: Bimodes, Qubits, and Biphotons (Springer, Cham, 2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    Quantum fluct uations and noise in parametric processes. I

    W. H. Louisell, A. Y ariv, and A. E. Siegman, “Quantum fluct uations and noise in parametric processes. I.” Phys. Rev. 124, 1646–1654 (1961)

    1961

  43. [43]

    Field statistics in p arametric luminescence,

    B. Y . Zel’dovich and D. N. Klyshko, “Field statistics in p arametric luminescence,” Sov. Phys. JETP Lett. 9, 40–43 (1969). Originally published in Zhurnal Eksperimental’noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki: Pisma v Redaktsiyu 9, 69–72 (1969)

    1969

  44. [44]

    Experimental test s of realistic local theories via Bell’s theorem,

    A. Aspect, P . Grangier, and G. Roger, “Experimental test s of realistic local theories via Bell’s theorem,” Phys. Rev . Lett. 47, 460–463 (1981)

    1981

  45. [45]

    Experimental test s of Bell’s inequalities using time-varying analyzers,

    A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, “Experimental test s of Bell’s inequalities using time-varying analyzers,” Ph ys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804–1807 (1982)

    1982

  46. [46]

    Nobel Committee for Physics, “Scientific background on t he Nobel Prize in Physics: For experiments with entangled photons, establishing the violation of Bell inequalities a nd pioneering quantum information science,” Tech. Rep. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2023/10/advanced-physicsprize2022-4.pdf , The Royal Sweedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm (2022)

    2023

  47. [47]

    Can quantum-mec hanical description of physical reality be considered 102 complete?

    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, “Can quantum-mec hanical description of physical reality be considered 102 complete?” Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935)

    1935

  48. [48]

    Violation of Bell’s inequality with continuous spatial variables,

    A. F. Abouraddy, T. Y arnall, B. E. A. Saleh, and M. C. Teich, “Violation of Bell’s inequality with continuous spatial variables,” Phys. Rev. A 75, 052114 (2007)

    2007

  49. [49]

    Experimental violation of Bell’s inequality in spatial-parity space,

    T. Y arnall, A. F. Abouraddy, B. E. A. Saleh, and M. C. Teich , “Experimental violation of Bell’s inequality in spatial-parity space,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 170408 (2007)

    2007

  50. [50]

    Spatial-to-spectral mapping in spontaneous parametric down-conversion,

    S. Carrasco, J. P . Torres, L. Torner,et al., “Spatial-to-spectral mapping in spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 70, 043817 (2004)

    2004

  51. [51]

    Spectral engineering of entangled two-photon states,

    S. Carrasco, A. V . Sergienko, B. E. A. Saleh, et al., “Spectral engineering of entangled two-photon states,” P hys. Rev. A 73, 063802 (2006)

    2006

  52. [52]

    Broadband light generation by noncollinear parametric d owncon- version,

    S. Carrasco, M. B. Nasr, A. V . Sergienko, et al., “Broadband light generation by noncollinear parametric d owncon- version,” Opt. Lett. 31, 253–255 (2006)

    2006

  53. [53]

    Observation of paramet ric luminescence in a lithium niobate crystal excited by an argon laser,

    D. N. Klyshko and D. P . Krindach, “Observation of paramet ric luminescence in a lithium niobate crystal excited by an argon laser,” Sov. Phys. JETP 27, 371–373 (1968). Originally published in Zhurnal Eksperimental’noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki54, 697–700 (1968)

    1968

  54. [54]

    Quasi -phase-matched second harmonic generation: tuning and tolerances,

    M. M. Fejer, G. A. Magel, D. H. Jundt, and R. L. Byer, “Quasi -phase-matched second harmonic generation: tuning and tolerances,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 28, 2631–2654 (1992)

    1992

  55. [55]

    Measurement of subpic osecond time intervals between two photons by interference,

    C. K. Hong, Z. Y . Ou, and L. Mandel, “Measurement of subpic osecond time intervals between two photons by interference,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2044–2046 (1987)

    2044

  56. [56]

    T wo-photon interference in a Mach-Zehnder interferomet er,

    J. G. Rarity, P . R. Tapster, E. Jakeman, et al., “T wo-photon interference in a Mach-Zehnder interferomet er,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1348–1351 (1990)

    1990

  57. [57]

    Interfering entangled photons of different colors,

    T. S. Larchuk, R. A. Campos, J. G. Rarity, et al., “Interfering entangled photons of different colors,” Phys . Rev. Lett. 70, 1603–1606 (1993)

    1993

  58. [58]

    Statistics of entangled-photon coincidences in parametric down- conversion,

    T. S. Larchuk, M. C. Teich, and B. E. A. Saleh, “Statistics of entangled-photon coincidences in parametric down- conversion,” Ann. New Y ork Acad. Sci. 755, 680–686 (1995)

    1995

  59. [59]

    New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled ph oton pairs,

    P . G. Kwiat, K. Mattle, H. Weinfurter, et al., “New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled ph oton pairs,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4337–4341 (1995)

    1995

  60. [60]

    Optical harmonics and nonli near phenomena,

    P . A. Franken and J. F. Ward, “Optical harmonics and nonli near phenomena,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 35, 23–39 (1963)

    1963

  61. [61]

    Entangled-photon generation from parametric down-conv ersion in media with inhomogeneous nonlinearity,

    G. Di Giuseppe, M. Atatüre, M. D. Shaw, et al., “Entangled-photon generation from parametric down-conv ersion in media with inhomogeneous nonlinearity,” Phys. Rev. A 66, 013801 (2002)

    2002

  62. [62]

    Quasi-phasematching,

    D. S. Hum and M. M. Fejer, “Quasi-phasematching,” Compte s Rendus Physique8, 180–198 (2007). (Special Journal Issue: Recent advances in crystal optics/Avancées récente s en optique cristalline)

    2007

  63. [63]

    Phase matching by periodic modulation of the nonlinear optical properties,

    S. Somekh and A. Y ariv, “Phase matching by periodic modulation of the nonlinear optical properties,” Opt. Commun. 6, 301–304 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4018(72 )90200-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0030-4018(72 1972

  64. [64]

    Quasi-phase-matched optical parametric oscillators in bulk periodically poled LiNbO 3,

    L. E. Myers, R. C. Eckardt, M. M. Fejer, et al. , “Quasi-phase-matched optical parametric oscillators in bulk periodically poled LiNbO 3,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 12, 2102–2116 (1995)

    1995

  65. [65]

    Engineering entangled-photon states using two- dimensional PPLN crystals,

    H. G. de Chatellus, G. Di Giuseppe, A. V . Sergienko, et al. , “Engineering entangled-photon states using two- dimensional PPLN crystals,” in Photon Management, vol. 5456, F. Wyrowski, ed., International Society for Opti cs and Photonics (SPIE, 2004), pp. 75–80

    2004

  66. [66]

    Non-collinear and non-degenerate polarization-entangled photon generation via concurrent type-I parametric downconversion in PPLN,

    H. Guillet de Chatellus, A. V . Sergienko, B. E. A. Saleh, a nd M. C. Teich, “Non-collinear and non-degenerate polarization-entangled photon generation via concurrent type-I parametric downconversion in PPLN,” Opt. Express 14, 10060–10072 (2006)

    2006

  67. [67]

    Properties of entangled photon pairs generated in periodically poled nonlinear crystals,

    J. Svozilík and J. Peřina, Jr., “Properties of entangled photon pairs generated in periodically poled nonlinear crystals,” Phys. Rev. A 80, 023819 (2009)

    2009

  68. [68]

    Optical properties and ferroelectric engineering of vap or-transport- equilibrated, near-stoichiometric lithium tantalate for frequency conversion,

    D. S. Hum, R. K. Route, G. D. Miller, et al., “Optical properties and ferroelectric engineering of vap or-transport- equilibrated, near-stoichiometric lithium tantalate for frequency conversion,” J. Appl. Phys. 101, 093108 (2007)

    2007

  69. [69]

    Generation of bri ght visible photon pairs using a periodically poled stoichiometric lithium tantalate crystal,

    H. J. Lee, H. Kim, M. Cha, and H. S. Moon, “Generation of bri ght visible photon pairs using a periodically poled stoichiometric lithium tantalate crystal,” Opt. Express 23, 14203–14210 (2015)

    2015

  70. [70]

    High-flux source of polarization-entangled photons from a periodically poled KTiOPO 4 parametric down-converter,

    C. E. Kuklewicz, M. Fiorentino, G. Messin, et al. , “High-flux source of polarization-entangled photons from a periodically poled KTiOPO 4 parametric down-converter,” Phys. Rev. A 69, 013807 (2004)

    2004

  71. [71]

    Variations on the theme of quantum optical coherence tomography: A review,

    M. C. Teich, B. E. A. Saleh, F. N. C. Wong, and J. H. Shapiro,“Variations on the theme of quantum optical coherence tomography: A review,” Quantum Inf. Process. 11, 903–923 (2012)

    2012

  72. [72]

    Demonstration of dispersion-canceled quantum-optical coherence tomography,

    M. B. Nasr, B. E. A. Saleh, A. V . Sergienko, and M. C. Teich,“Demonstration of dispersion-canceled quantum-optical coherence tomography,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 083601 (2003)

    2003

  73. [73]

    Generation of high-flux ultra-broadband light by bandwid th amplification in spontaneous parametric down conversion,

    M. B. Nasr, G. Di Giuseppe, B. E. A. Saleh, et al., “Generation of high-flux ultra-broadband light by bandwid th amplification in spontaneous parametric down conversion,” Opt. Commun. 246, 521–528 (2005)

    2005

  74. [74]

    Ultrabroadband entangled photons on a nanophotonic chip ,

    U. A. Javid, J. Ling, J. Staffa, et al., “Ultrabroadband entangled photons on a nanophotonic chip ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 183601 (2021)

    2021

  75. [75]

    Integrated, bright broadband, two-colour parametric do wn-conversion source,

    R. Pollmann, F. Roeder, V . Quiring, et al., “Integrated, bright broadband, two-colour parametric do wn-conversion source,” Opt. Express 32, 23945–23955 (2024)

    2024

  76. [76]

    Ultra-broadband non-degenerate guided-wave bi-photon source in the near and mid-infrared,

    F. Roeder, A. Gnanavel, R. Pollmann, et al., “Ultra-broadband non-degenerate guided-wave bi-photon source in the near and mid-infrared,” New J. Phys. 26, 123025 (2024)

    2024

  77. [77]

    Enhancing the axial resolution of quantum optical cohere nce tomography by chirped quasi-phase matching,

    S. Carrasco, J. P . Torres, L. Torner,et al., “Enhancing the axial resolution of quantum optical cohere nce tomography by chirped quasi-phase matching,” Opt. Lett. 29, 2429–2431 (2004). 103

    2004

  78. [78]

    Ultrabroadband biphotons generated via chirped quasi-p hase-matched optical parametric down-conversion,

    M. B. Nasr, S. Carrasco, B. E. A. Saleh,et al., “Ultrabroadband biphotons generated via chirped quasi-p hase-matched optical parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 183601 (2008)

    2008

  79. [79]

    Submicron axial resolution in an ultrabroadband two-pho ton interferometer using superconducting single-photon dete ctors,

    M. B. Nasr, O. Minaeva, G. N. Goltsman, et al. , “Submicron axial resolution in an ultrabroadband two-pho ton interferometer using superconducting single-photon dete ctors,” Opt. Express 16, 15104–15108 (2008)

    2008

  80. [80]

    Ultrabroadband coherence-domain imaging using paramet ric downconversion and superconducting single-photon detectors at 1064 nm,

    N. Mohan, O. Minaeva, G. N. Goltsman, et al. , “Ultrabroadband coherence-domain imaging using paramet ric downconversion and superconducting single-photon detectors at 1064 nm,” Appl. Opt. 48, 4009–4017 (2009)

    2009

Showing first 80 references.