pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13382 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.other· nlin.CD· nlin.SI

Dynamics of wavepackets and entanglement in many-body kicked rotors under quantum resonance

Yangshuo Zhou , Jiao Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 13:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.othernlin.CDnlin.SI
keywords many-body kicked rotorsquantum resonancewavepacket dynamicsbipartite entanglement entropydynamical regimespotential symmetriesquadratic spreadingperiod-2 oscillation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Symmetries of single-particle potentials dictate three dynamical regimes for wavepackets and entanglement in resonant many-body kicked rotors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In a system of interacting quantum kicked rotors each tuned to resonance, the interplay of principal and secondary resonances generates collective dynamics that depend on potential symmetries. Both the wavepacket spreading and the bipartite entanglement entropy fall into one of three analytically identified regimes: quadratic growth, period-2 oscillation, or a hybrid of the two. These regimes follow directly from the symmetry properties of the kick potentials because the interactions preserve the individual resonance conditions. A reader would care because the result supplies an exact analytic bridge between single-particle symmetries and many-body observables, showing how resonance can be used to control entanglement growth in a tunable quantum system.

Core claim

The paper shows that for both the wavepacket and bipartite entanglement entropy, three distinct dynamical regimes—quadratic spreading, period-2 oscillation, and their hybrid—are analytically demonstrated and governed by the respective symmetries of the relevant potentials. It illustrates the direct connection between wavepacket and entanglement dynamics on the basis of these symmetries.

What carries the argument

Symmetry classification of the single-particle kick potentials, which assigns the collective wavepacket and entanglement dynamics to quadratic spreading, period-2 oscillation, or a hybrid regime.

Load-bearing premise

Many-body interactions preserve the individual resonance conditions and allow single-particle potential symmetries to classify collective dynamics without significant additional corrections.

What would settle it

Numerical simulation or experiment in which strengthening interactions causes the observed regime to deviate from the symmetry prediction, for example by destroying period-2 oscillation in a symmetric potential.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13382 by Jiao Wang, Yangshuo Zhou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Dynamics of the two-rotor system with potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Dynamics of the extended, generalized model with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Dynamics of three illustrative higher-order-resonance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. From top to bottom, the curves in the main panel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The simulation results for the two-rotor model (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Dynamics of the two-top model with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate a many-body interacting system of quantum kicked rotors, where each rotor resides in its respective quantum resonance. Rich many-body dynamics are found to emerge from the interplay between the principal and secondary resonances. In particular, for both the wavepacket and bipartite entanglement entropy, we analytically demonstrate three distinct dynamical regimes -- quadratic spreading (growth), period-2 oscillation, and their hybrid -- governed by the respective symmetries of the relevant potentials. Based on these symmetries, the connection between the wavepacket and the entanglement dynamics is illustrated. Other related issues are also discussed, including higher-order resonance effects, the robustness of the predicted dynamical behaviors, extension to many-body kicked tops, and relevance to experimental studies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines a many-body system of interacting quantum kicked rotors, each operating at quantum resonance. It claims to analytically demonstrate three distinct dynamical regimes—quadratic spreading, period-2 oscillations, and a hybrid—for both wave-packet spreading and bipartite entanglement entropy, with the regimes determined solely by the symmetries of the single-particle kicking potentials. The work further connects wave-packet and entanglement dynamics, discusses higher-order resonance effects, robustness, extensions to kicked tops, and experimental relevance.

Significance. If the central analytical claims hold, the paper supplies a symmetry-based classification that links single-particle potential properties to collective many-body observables in resonant kicked rotors. This could provide a useful organizing principle for quantum chaos and many-body delocalization studies, with the explicit connection drawn between spreading and entanglement dynamics representing a clear strength. The analytical (rather than purely numerical) character of the regime identification is a positive feature.

major comments (3)
  1. [main derivation of many-body dynamics (around the transition from single-particle to interacting case)] The central claim that the three regimes for both wave-packet spreading and bipartite entanglement entropy are governed exclusively by single-particle potential symmetries requires an explicit demonstration that the many-body interaction term does not generate effective corrections or symmetry-breaking contributions to the collective evolution operator. The manuscript should provide the full many-body time-evolution operator (or the effective Floquet operator) and show how the interaction preserves each rotor’s individual resonance condition without additional phase accumulation or coupling terms that would invalidate the symmetry classification.
  2. [section deriving entanglement entropy regimes] For the bipartite entanglement entropy, the analytical mapping from potential symmetry to the observed regimes (quadratic growth, period-2 oscillation, hybrid) must be derived from the reduced density matrix or the explicit entanglement measure; it is not sufficient to invoke the single-particle symmetry classification without showing how the interaction affects the Schmidt decomposition or the time-dependent entanglement spectrum.
  3. [robustness and higher-order resonance discussion] The robustness discussion should include a quantitative check (analytic or numeric) that the predicted regimes survive for finite interaction strength and finite particle number; otherwise the claim that the regimes are determined solely by single-particle symmetries remains conditional on the interaction being sufficiently weak or specially structured.
minor comments (2)
  1. [introductory definitions] Notation for the kicking potentials and their symmetry properties should be introduced with explicit definitions (e.g., even/odd character or specific functional forms) before being used to label the three regimes.
  2. [discussion of connection between observables] The connection between wave-packet spreading and entanglement dynamics is asserted but would benefit from a concise statement of the shared symmetry origin in a single paragraph or equation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for providing constructive comments. We address each of the major comments point by point below, indicating the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [main derivation of many-body dynamics (around the transition from single-particle to interacting case)] The central claim that the three regimes for both wave-packet spreading and bipartite entanglement entropy are governed exclusively by single-particle potential symmetries requires an explicit demonstration that the many-body interaction term does not generate effective corrections or symmetry-breaking contributions to the collective evolution operator. The manuscript should provide the full many-body time-evolution operator (or the effective Floquet operator) and show how the interaction preserves each rotor’s individual resonance condition without additional phase accumulation or coupling terms that would invalidate the symmetry classification.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration strengthens the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will insert the full many-body Floquet operator, which factors as the product of the single-particle resonant evolution (the identity operator up to a global phase) and the interaction term. Because the interaction is diagonal in the angular-position basis and the resonance condition sets the free evolution to the identity, no additional phase accumulation or symmetry-breaking coupling arises; the collective operator therefore inherits the symmetry classification of the single-particle kicking potentials without modification. This derivation will be placed immediately after the transition from the single-particle to the interacting case. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [section deriving entanglement entropy regimes] For the bipartite entanglement entropy, the analytical mapping from potential symmetry to the observed regimes (quadratic growth, period-2 oscillation, hybrid) must be derived from the reduced density matrix or the explicit entanglement measure; it is not sufficient to invoke the single-particle symmetry classification without showing how the interaction affects the Schmidt decomposition or the time-dependent entanglement spectrum.

    Authors: We will expand the entanglement section to begin from the reduced density matrix of a single rotor. At resonance the many-body state remains a product of single-particle evolutions tensored with the interaction phase factors; the Schmidt decomposition of the reduced density matrix is therefore still governed by the symmetry class of the single-particle kicking potential. We will explicitly compute the time-dependent eigenvalues of the reduced density matrix for each of the three symmetry classes, thereby deriving the quadratic growth, period-2 oscillation, and hybrid regimes directly from the entanglement spectrum rather than by analogy. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [robustness and higher-order resonance discussion] The robustness discussion should include a quantitative check (analytic or numeric) that the predicted regimes survive for finite interaction strength and finite particle number; otherwise the claim that the regimes are determined solely by single-particle symmetries remains conditional on the interaction being sufficiently weak or specially structured.

    Authors: Our analytic derivation holds exactly at resonance for arbitrary interaction strength, since the interaction term commutes with the resonance condition. To address finite-N effects we will add numerical simulations for N = 2–8 and a range of interaction strengths, confirming that the three regimes persist until the interaction becomes comparable to the kicking amplitude. These checks will be included in the robustness subsection together with a brief discussion of the parameter regime in which deviations appear. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: regimes derived from independent symmetry properties of potentials

full rationale

The paper analytically demonstrates the three dynamical regimes (quadratic spreading, period-2 oscillation, hybrid) for wavepacket spreading and bipartite entanglement entropy directly from the symmetries of the single-particle potentials under quantum resonance conditions. These symmetries are external properties of the kicking potentials and are not defined in terms of the many-body dynamics, fitted parameters, or self-referential equations within the paper. The many-body interactions are treated as preserving the individual resonance conditions without introducing symmetry-breaking corrections that would require fitting or self-definition. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or renaming of known results are identified in the derivation chain; the central claims remain self-contained against the stated assumptions and external symmetry inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claims rest on standard quantum-mechanical assumptions for periodically driven systems and the applicability of potential symmetries to the many-body case.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Each rotor resides at its respective quantum resonance
    This condition enables the interplay between principal and secondary resonances that produces the reported dynamics.
  • domain assumption Symmetries of the relevant potentials classify the dynamical regimes
    This symmetry classification is invoked to derive the quadratic, period-2, and hybrid behaviors for both wavepacket and entanglement.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5417 in / 1250 out tokens · 47688 ms · 2026-05-10T13:49:17.976097+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Colloquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 021001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    A. M. Kaufman, M. E. Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, P. M. Preiss, and M. Greiner, Quantum ther- malization through entanglement in an isolated many- body system, Science353, 794 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Jacquod and C

    P. Jacquod and C. Petitjean, Decoherence, entanglement and irreversibility in quantum dynamical systems with few degrees of freedom, Advances in Physics58, 67 (2009)

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Evolution of entanglement en- tropy in one-dimensional systems, J. Stat. Mech: Theory Exp.2005, P04010 (2005)

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    Lerose and S

    A. Lerose and S. Pappalardi, Bridging entanglement dynamics and chaos in semiclassical systems, Phys. Rev. A102, 032404 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Lakshminarayan, S

    A. Lakshminarayan, S. C. L. Srivastava, R. Ketzmerick, A. B¨ acker, and S. Tomsovic, Entanglement and local- ization transitions in eigenstates of interacting chaotic systems, Phys. Rev. E94, 010205 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Adachi, M

    S. Adachi, M. Toda, and K. Ikeda, Quantum-classical correspondence in many-dimensional quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 659 (1988)

    work page 1988

  8. [8]

    Doron and S

    E. Doron and S. Fishman, Anderson localization for a two-dimensional rotor, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 867 (1988)

    work page 1988

  9. [9]

    Gadway, J

    B. Gadway, J. Reeves, L. Krinner, and D. Schneble, Evidence for a quantum-to-classical transition in a pair of coupled quantum rotors, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 190401 (2013)

    work page 2013

  10. [10]

    Matsui, H

    F. Matsui, H. S. Yamada, and K. S. Ikeda, Relation between irreversibility and entanglement in classically chaotic quantum kicked rotors, Europhysics Letters114, 60010 (2016)

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    Notarnicola, F

    S. Notarnicola, F. Iemini, D. Rossini, R. Fazio, A. Silva, and A. Russomanno, From localization to anomalous diffusion in the dynamics of coupled kicked rotors, Phys. Rev. E97, 022202 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    E. B. Rozenbaum and V. Galitski, Dynamical localization of coupled relativistic kicked rotors, Phys. Rev. B95, 064303 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Paul and A

    S. Paul and A. B¨ acker, Linear and logarithmic entangle- ment production in an interacting chaotic system, Phys. Rev. E102, 050102 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    J. J. Pulikkottil, A. Lakshminarayan, S. C. L. Srivastava, A. B¨ acker, and S. Tomsovic, Entanglement production by interaction quenches of quantum chaotic subsystems, Phys. Rev. E101, 032212 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Nambudiripad, J

    A. Nambudiripad, J. B. Kannan, and M. S. Santhanam, Chaos and localized phases in a two-body linear kicked rotor system, Phys. Rev. E109, 034206 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Fujisaki, A

    H. Fujisaki, A. Tanaka, and T. Miyadera, Dynamical aspects of quantum entanglement for coupled mapping systems, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.72, 111 (2003)

    work page 2003

  17. [17]

    S. Paul, J. B. Kannan, and M. S. Santhanam, Faster entanglement driven by quantum resonance in many- body kicked rotors, Phys. Rev. B110, 144301 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Casati, B

    G. Casati, B. V. Chirikov, F. M. Izraelev, and J. Ford, Stochastic behavior of a quantum pendulum under a periodic perturbation, inStochastic Behavior in Classical and Quantum Hamiltonian Systems, edited by G. Casati and J. Ford (Springer, Berlin, 1979) pp. 334–352

    work page 1979

  19. [19]

    Fishman, D

    S. Fishman, D. R. Grempel, and R. E. Prange, Chaos, quantum recurrences, and anderson localization, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 509 (1982)

    work page 1982

  20. [20]

    F. M. Izrailev, Simple models of quantum chaos: Spec- trum and eigenfunctions, Phys. Rep.196, 299 (1990)

    work page 1990

  21. [21]

    Casati and B

    G. Casati and B. Chirikov,Quantum Chaos: Between Order and Disorder(Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    work page 1995

  22. [22]

    Garreau, Quantum simulation of disordered sys- tems with cold atoms, C

    J.-C. Garreau, Quantum simulation of disordered sys- tems with cold atoms, C. R. Physique18, 31 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    F. M. Izrailev and D. L. Shepelyanskii, Quantum reso- nance for a rotator in a nonlinear periodic field, Theor. Math. Phys.43, 553 (1980)

    work page 1980

  24. [24]

    It follows straight- forwardly that the two operators are equivalent

    Applying the two operators exp(−iπp 2) and exp(−iπp) to an eigenstate|l⟩ofpleads to the same result, i.e., exp(−ilπ)|l⟩= (−1) l|l⟩, due to the fact that an integer and its square share the same parity. It follows straight- forwardly that the two operators are equivalent

    work page

  25. [25]

    I. Dana, E. Eisenberg, and N. Shnerb, Antiresonance and localization in quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. E54, 5948 (1996)

    work page 1996

  26. [26]

    Islam, R

    R. Islam, R. Ma, P. M. Preiss, M. Eric Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, and M. Greiner, Measuring entanglement entropy in a quantum many-body system, Nature528, 77 (2015)

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    W. W. Ho and D. A. Abanin, Entanglement dynamics in quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B95, 094302 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Wang and P

    X. Wang and P. Zanardi, Quantum entanglement of unitary operators on bipartite systems, Phys. Rev. A66, 044303 (2002)

    work page 2002

  29. [29]

    J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano,Modern Quantum Me- chanics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Russomanno, Spatiotemporally ordered patterns in a chain of coupled dissipative kicked rotors, Phys

    A. Russomanno, Spatiotemporally ordered patterns in a chain of coupled dissipative kicked rotors, Phys. Rev. B 108, 094305 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Zou and J

    Z. Zou and J. Wang, A pseudoclassical theory for the 16 wavepacket dynamics of the kicked rotor model, Sci. China: Phys. Mech. Astron.67, 230511 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Haake, M

    F. Haake, M. Ku´ s, and R. Scharf, Classical and quantum chaos for a kicked top, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter65, 381 (1987)

    work page 1987

  33. [33]

    Haake and D

    F. Haake and D. L. Shepelyansky, The kicked rotator as a limit of the kicked top, EPL5, 671 (1988)

    work page 1988

  34. [34]

    Zou and J

    Z. Zou and J. Wang, Pseudoclassical dynamics of the kicked top, Entropy24(2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Parker and C

    J. Parker and C. R. Stroud, Coherence and decay of rydberg wave packets, Phys. Rev. Lett.56, 716 (1986)

    work page 1986

  36. [36]

    Robinett, Quantum wave packet revivals, Physics Reports392, 1 (2004)

    R. Robinett, Quantum wave packet revivals, Physics Reports392, 1 (2004)

    work page 2004

  37. [37]

    E. B. Rozenbaum, S. Ganeshan, and V. Galitski, Lya- punov exponent and out-of-time-ordered correlator’s growth rate in a chaotic system, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 086801 (2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    F. Haug, M. Bienert, W. P. Schleich, T. H. Seligman, and M. G. Raizen, Motional stability of the quantum kicked rotor: A fidelity approach, Phys. Rev. A71, 043803 (2005)

    work page 2005

  39. [39]

    Longhi, Localization, quantum resonances, and ratchet acceleration in a periodically kickedPT-symmetric quan- tum rotator, Phys

    S. Longhi, Localization, quantum resonances, and ratchet acceleration in a periodically kickedPT-symmetric quan- tum rotator, Phys. Rev. A95, 012125 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    W.-L. Zhao, J. Wang, X. Wang, and P. Tong, Directed momentum current induced by thePT-symmetric driv- ing, Phys. Rev. E99, 042201 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    Chen, R.-H

    Z.-Q. Chen, R.-H. Ni, Y. Song, L. Huang, J. Wang, and G. Casati, Correspondence principle, ergodicity, and finite-time dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 130402 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Y. Guo, S. Dhar, A. Yang, Z. Chen, H. Yao, M. Horvath, L. Ying, M. Landini, and H.-C. Naegerl, Observation of many-body dynamical localization, Science389, 716 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    P. Qin, A. Andreanov, H. C. Park, and S. Flach, Inter- acting ultracold atomic kicked rotors: loss of dynamical localization, Sci. Rep.7, 41139 (2017). Appendix A: Derivation of Eq. (28) Thet-step evolution operator of our many-body kicked rotor model in the two lowest-order resonances isU t = U t localU t I, whereU t I denotes the contribution from the i...

    work page 2017