pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13903 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · astro-ph.HE

Recognition: unknown

The 256-antenna Coherent All-Sky Monitor

Liam Connor , Vikram Ravi , Pranav Sanghavi , Vishnu Balakrishan , Luke Chung , Saren Daghlian , Liam Dunn , Anthony Griffin
show 11 more authors
Charlie Harnach Mark Hodges Andrew Jameson Michael Gutierrez Calvin Leung Mei Lin Advait Mehla Obinna Modilim Nimesh Patel Kendrick Smith Lingzhen Zeng
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.HE
keywords fast radio burstsaperture arraysradio astronomy instrumentationall-sky monitoringGPU processingOwens Valley Radio Observatorytransient detection
0
0 comments X

The pith

A 256-antenna dense array at 375-500 MHz can detect fast radio bursts from the local universe.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents the 256-antenna Coherent All-Sky Monitor, a new radio instrument now being built at Owens Valley. It claims that the array's enormous field of view combined with real-time coherent processing will let it catch fast radio bursts occurring in nearby galaxies rather than only at cosmological distances. Initial on-sky tests with the first 24 antennas already run a working GPU pipeline that searches for these bursts in real time. The authors argue this nearby sample will reveal the bursts' physical origins, measure gas in galaxy halos, and find their counterparts at other wavelengths.

Core claim

The central claim is that CASM-256's field of view of roughly 10,000 square degrees and its point-source sensitivity, achieved through coherent cross-correlation and beamforming across 256 antennas, will enable detection of fast radio bursts in the local universe. The instrument operates between 375 and 500 MHz and processes data on GPUs in real time, allowing searches for both extragalactic bursts and Galactic fast transients such as giant pulses and long-period radio sources. The design is presented as scalable to arrays with tens of thousands of antennas.

What carries the argument

The dense aperture array with real-time GPU-based coherent processing for cross-correlation, beamforming, and transient search, which converts signals from 256 antennas into wide-field images and burst detections without losing data.

If this is right

  • Detection of nearby fast radio bursts will let observers measure the baryonic content of galaxy halos along the lines of sight.
  • The same data stream will uncover prompt multi-wavelength and multi-messenger counterparts to the bursts.
  • The array will also find fast transients inside the Milky Way, including analogs of fast radio bursts, giant pulses from pulsars, and long-period radio transients.
  • Scaling the same architecture to tens of thousands of antennas could produce a catalog of one million fast radio bursts.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Successful operation would demonstrate that moderate-cost digital arrays can replace or complement large single dishes for all-sky transient work.
  • The real-time detection capability could trigger immediate follow-up at optical, X-ray, and gravitational-wave facilities.
  • Extending the frequency band or adding polarization information might further constrain burst emission mechanisms without changing the core hardware.

Load-bearing premise

That real-time coherent processing on GPUs for all 256 antennas can run continuously without calibration errors, data loss, or radio-frequency interference destroying the sensitivity needed to see nearby bursts.

What would settle it

No fast radio bursts detected from within roughly 100 megaparsecs after one year of full operation, or the pipeline falling out of real time during normal observing conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13903 by Advait Mehla, Andrew Jameson, Anthony Griffin, Calvin Leung, Charlie Harnach, Kendrick Smith, Liam Connor, Liam Dunn, Lingzhen Zeng, Luke Chung, Mark Hodges, Mei Lin, Michael Gutierrez, Nimesh Patel, Obinna Modilim, Pranav Sanghavi, Saren Daghlian, Vikram Ravi, Vishnu Balakrishan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The 256-antenna Coherent All-Sky Monitor (CASM-256) under construction at the Owens Valley Radio Observatory (OVRO). A 20×3 m core of 256-antennas at 375–500 MHz will search for fast transients and localize with outrigger stations (not shown, currently under design). North is up on left panel satellite image. The bottom right is a rendering of the core array without radomes. The top right panels show the P… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The expected CASM detection rate as a function of number of antennas (left) and observing frequency (right). The left panel shows annual FRB detections colored by radio bandwidth from 10 MHz (purple) to 500 MHz (yellow). Lines of constant data rate are plotted, where we assume dual-polarization feeds, 8 bit data, and Nyquist sampling (i.e. rate is 32 Nant B in bits/s). Points on those curves that are not i… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The schematic circuit for the CASM printed dipole feed network (M. Gutierrez 2025). The signal propagates along the microstrip feed line and is coupled to the dipole antenna. The open stub at the end of the microstrip and the shorted stub in the dipole antenna are optimized to achieve the best coupling efficiency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The CASM antenna model consists of four sets of printed dipoles and feed lines integrated into a planar PCB, forming a dual-polarization antenna. The antenna is excited through the SMA feed points labeled as ‘Pol 1’ and ‘Pol 2’ in the figure. 5. DIGITAL BACKEND 5.1. F-engine The CASM F-engine is responsible for digitizing our signal, channelization, and streaming voltage data to our GPU servers via a netwo… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Simulated and measured return loss performance for both polarizations is shown. From 350 MHz to 515 MHz, the return loss is better than -15 dB. The -10 dB bandwidth covers the frequency from 330 MHz to 570 MHz, yielding a fractional bandwidth greater than 50%. F-engine vault beside array GPU servers correlator building [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Compute hardware for CASM-256. The left panel shows an underground vault beside the core array. It houses 43 SNAP boards, a 100 Gbe switch, fiber connection to the control building, and a clock distribution system. The right panel shows two GPU servers, each with two dual-port 200 Gbe NICs and 10 RTX 4000 Ada GPUs. These are in a control building roughly 300 m from the core array. 5.2. Clock & synchronizat… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The measured digital spectrum from one CASM-256 antenna. Our F-engine produces a spectrum every 32 µs with 4096 channels from 375-500 MHz. We send 3072 contiguous channels off the SNAP board within that range, limited by the 10 Gbe SFP+ port on the board, but single-ADC spectra can be obtained for the full range. The plotted spectrum is a typical 1.6 s integration. Our chosen 93 MHz band is shown in the or… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Example sky positions of 1020 beams from the FFT beamformer (black dots, left) and a single synthesized beam for the CASM-256 layout (right). The FFT beamformer oversamples such that arbitrary beams can be formed from linear combinations of the 3072 intensity beams. In this case, we show 1020 beams placed on a grid, but other configurations are possible. This figure uses the 450 MHz PSF. 7.2. Beamforming B… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The first core antennas and fringes from CASM-256 at OVRO. Images on the left show the groundscreen built atop the north-south railroad and the first 37 antennas (six planks plus one antenna beside the core for testing). The right figures show fringes of the Sun for a single baseline. The top right panel is visibility phase vs. time and frequency; the bottom right panel is the real component of visibility… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The correlation matrix during solar transit. Each off-diagonal panel corresponds to 5.5 hours of visibility data as a function of frequency (vertical axis) and time. We plot a clipped real-component of Vij . The impact of cross-talk can be seen in short (≲ 3 m) baselines. Diagonals show each antenna’s unflattened auto-spectrum. sent over 10–20 m of coaxial cable, digitized and channelized by the SNAP boar… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: A narrow-band (420-423 MHz) dirty image of Cygnus A. Visibilities from 15 antennas were imaged shortly before sunrise with phase center at the position of Cyg A. l and m are direction cosines. test antenna single formed beam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Output from the real-time beamformer during a solar transit, written with tsamp = 4s. The left panel shows the array configuration for commissioning data in this work. This is the top half of the 256-antenna array. Filled boxes are antennas that have been deployed, filled boxes with black edges have operational analog chains. Chromatic sidelobes can be seen in the right panel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/ful… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: An estimate of cross-talk amplitude vs. baseline length for the first 16 CASM antennas. In the absence of cross-talk, Vij/ √ ViiVjj ought to have mean zero when there is no bright source in the beam and the amplitude of the y−axis would be due to noise and residual sky signal. As expected, cross-talk is largest for adjacent antennas, falling to several percent for baselines longer than 5 m. Color correspo… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Single pulse injection recovered by the real-time pipeline. We inject simulated FRBs into intensity beams to test the performance of the CASM real-time search. Shown here is an example of a “bow-tie” of candidates for a high S/N injection, recovered at the correct DM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Radio astronomy is uniquely coupled to exponential trends in computation because the optics (cross-correlation, beamforming, and imaging) and spectrometry (i.e. channelization) can now be done digitally. Inexpensive analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) can sample signals from large numbers of antennas and graphics processing units (GPUs) allow us to coherently process wide-field radio data in real time, motivating large-$N$ aperture arrays at moderate cost. We describe the 256-antenna Coherent All-Sky Monitor (CASM-256), a dense aperture array operating at 375-500\,MHz, currently being deployed at the Owens Valley Radio Observatory (OVRO) in Big Pine, California. The large field-of-view (FoV$\sim10^4$\,deg$^2$) and point-source sensitivity of CASM-256 will allow it to detect local Universe fast radio bursts (FRBs). The nearby sample is ideal for unveiling the physical origin of FRBs, measuring the baryonic content of nearby galaxy halos, and discovering prompt multi-wavelength and multi-messenger counterparts to FRBs. CASM will search for fast transients in the Milky Way such as FRB analogs, pulsar giant pulses, and the new source class known as long-period radio transients. We describe the instrument and present on-sky data from the first two dozen antennas, including an operational real-time GPU based FRB search pipeline. We emphasize the scalability of the concept and describe paths to a future CASM array with tens of thousands of antennas that could detect one million FRBs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the design, deployment, and initial operations of the 256-antenna Coherent All-Sky Monitor (CASM-256), a dense aperture array at 375-500 MHz located at OVRO. It reports on-sky data from the first 24 antennas together with an operational real-time GPU-based FRB search pipeline, and argues that the instrument's large FoV (~10^4 deg²) and point-source sensitivity will enable detection of local-Universe FRBs, Milky Way transients, and eventual scaling to much larger arrays.

Significance. If the performance and scalability claims are substantiated, CASM-256 would provide a distinctive nearby FRB sample useful for origin studies, halo baryon measurements, and multi-messenger follow-up. The demonstrated real-time GPU pipeline on the initial 24 antennas constitutes a concrete engineering milestone that supports the broader feasibility of coherent all-sky monitoring at moderate cost.

major comments (2)
  1. [GPU pipeline and initial on-sky results section] The central claim that CASM-256 will detect local-Universe FRBs rests on achieving the stated point-source sensitivity via coherent beamforming and real-time search at N=256. The section describing the GPU pipeline and initial results demonstrates an operational real-time pipeline only for the first 24 antennas and provides no quantitative data-rate calculations, latency measurements, cross-correlation timing benchmarks (which scale as N²), calibration stability tests, or RFI-rejection performance at full array size. Without these, it remains unclear whether data loss, computational load, or residual errors will degrade effective sensitivity below the threshold needed for nearby FRBs.
  2. [Abstract and §1 (Introduction)] The abstract and introduction assert design goals for point-source sensitivity and FRB detection capability, yet the manuscript supplies no quantitative sensitivity verification, error budgets, or on-sky FRB detection statistics from the first antennas. This absence is load-bearing because the paper is an instrument description whose primary scientific justification is the future detection yield.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure captions and results section] Figure captions and text should explicitly state the number of antennas used for each presented on-sky dataset so readers can immediately distinguish 24-antenna results from projected 256-antenna performance.
  2. [Abstract and instrument description] The frequency range is stated as 375-500 MHz in the abstract; confirm that all subsequent technical specifications (e.g., channelization, beamforming) use the identical band definition.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 2 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for recognizing the potential significance of CASM-256. We respond point by point to the major comments, clarifying the manuscript's scope as a design and initial-results paper while committing to revisions that strengthen the supporting evidence for scalability and sensitivity projections.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [GPU pipeline and initial on-sky results section] The central claim that CASM-256 will detect local-Universe FRBs rests on achieving the stated point-source sensitivity via coherent beamforming and real-time search at N=256. The section describing the GPU pipeline and initial results demonstrates an operational real-time pipeline only for the first 24 antennas and provides no quantitative data-rate calculations, latency measurements, cross-correlation timing benchmarks (which scale as N²), calibration stability tests, or RFI-rejection performance at full array size. Without these, it remains unclear whether data loss, computational load, or residual errors will degrade effective sensitivity below the threshold needed for nearby FRBs.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative scaling arguments are needed to support the central claims. The manuscript presents the 24-antenna pipeline as an operational demonstration of the real-time architecture rather than a full-array result. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection containing (i) data-rate calculations showing linear scaling of input volume with N and beam output volume, (ii) latency estimates extrapolated from the existing GPU kernel timings, (iii) cross-correlation benchmark scaling (O(N²) but mitigated by the dense-array geometry and GPU partitioning), and (iv) projected calibration stability and RFI-rejection performance based on the 24-antenna data. These additions will be accompanied by a clear statement that full-array on-sky validation remains future work. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract and §1 (Introduction)] The abstract and introduction assert design goals for point-source sensitivity and FRB detection capability, yet the manuscript supplies no quantitative sensitivity verification, error budgets, or on-sky FRB detection statistics from the first antennas. This absence is load-bearing because the paper is an instrument description whose primary scientific justification is the future detection yield.

    Authors: The quoted sensitivity values are calculated from the array design parameters (antenna effective area, system temperature, coherent beamforming gain at N=256, and 125 MHz bandwidth). We acknowledge that the text does not yet include a formal error budget or empirical verification from the 24-antenna data. No FRBs have been detected in the limited on-sky dataset presented, so detection statistics cannot be supplied. In revision we will insert a dedicated error-budget paragraph with uncertainty estimates on the sensitivity figures and will report any null-result upper limits derived from the existing observations. The scientific justification will remain prospective, now supported by the added quantitative details. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct on-sky sensitivity verification and FRB detection statistics for the completed 256-antenna array, because full deployment is still underway.
  • Measured end-to-end latency and cross-correlation timing at N=256, which cannot be obtained until the full hardware is installed and commissioned.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Instrument description paper with no derivation chain or fitted predictions

full rationale

The manuscript is a hardware and software description of the CASM-256 array. It reports design parameters, presents on-sky commissioning data from the first 24 antennas, and states that the real-time GPU pipeline is scalable. No equations derive a new quantity from prior results, no parameters are fitted to a subset and then relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing claims rest on self-citations that themselves reduce to the present work. The central sensitivity and FRB-detection statements are engineering assertions grounded in stated specifications and partial-array measurements rather than any self-referential reduction. This is the expected non-finding for an instrument paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on engineering assumptions about digital signal processing scalability and RFI environment rather than new physical axioms or fitted parameters.

free parameters (2)
  • Antenna count (256)
    Chosen as a practical scale for initial deployment balancing cost, compute load, and sensitivity.
  • Frequency band (375-500 MHz)
    Selected to optimize FRB detection while minimizing terrestrial interference.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Current GPU hardware can perform real-time coherent beamforming and FRB search for 256 antennas at the required bandwidth.
    Invoked in the description of the operational pipeline and scalability path.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5648 in / 1303 out tokens · 51779 ms · 2026-05-10T12:14:47.235602+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. White dwarf + M dwarf Detached Binaries in Long Period Radio Transients: Observed Binary Parameters, Evolution, and Population Constraints

    astro-ph.SR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Two long period radio transients are detached white dwarf-M dwarf binaries with matching periods, massive cool crystallized white dwarfs, low inclinations, and an estimated population of 100-2000 such systems within 2 kpc.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 102 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    D., Acernese, F., et al

    Abbott, R., et al. 2023, Astrophys. J., 955, 155, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd770

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd770 2023

  2. [2]

    2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 863, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad188

    Amiri, M., Bandura, K., Berger, P., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 863, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad188

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad188 2018

  3. [3]

    2020, Nature, 582, 351–355, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2398-2

    Amiri, M., Andersen, B., Bandura, K., et al. 2020, Nature, 582, 351–355, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2398-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2398-2 2020

  4. [4]

    https://download.tek.com/datasheet/ RSA7100B Datasheet-EN US 37W-61645-5.pdf The CHIME Collaboration, Amiri, M., Bandura, K., et al

    Amiri, M., Bandura, K., Boskovic, A., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 261, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6fd9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac6fd9 2022

  5. [5]

    C., Bandura, K., Bhardwaj, M., et al

    Andersen, B. C., Bandura, K., Bhardwaj, M., et al. 2020, Nature, 587, 54, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2863-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2863-y 2020

  6. [6]

    Baars, J. W. M., & Hooghoudt, B. G. 1974, A&A, 31, 323

    1974

  7. [7]

    E., Amiri, M., et al

    Bandura, K., Addison, G. E., Amiri, M., et al. 2014, in Proc. SPIE 9145, Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes V, Vol. 9145, 914522, doi: 10.1117/12.2054950

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2054950 2014

  8. [8]

    Science , author =

    Bannister, K. W., Deller, A. T., Phillips, C., et al. 2019, Science, 365, 565, doi: 10.1126/science.aaw5903

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aaw5903 2019

  9. [9]

    M., Kaspi, V

    Bhardwaj, M., Gaensler, B. M., Kaspi, V. M., et al. 2021, ApJL, 910, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abeaa6

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abeaa6 2021

  10. [10]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2100 , archiveprefix =

    Bigwood, L., Amon, A., Schneider, A., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 655, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2100

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2100 2024

  11. [11]

    K., Berger, E., Andrew, S

    Blanchard, P. K., Berger, E., Andrew, S. E., et al. 2025, ApJL, 989, L49, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf29f

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf29f 2025

  12. [12]

    D., Ravi, V., Belov, K

    Bochenek, C. D., Ravi, V., Belov, K. V., et al. 2020, Nature, 587, 59, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2872-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2872-x 2020

  13. [13]

    Hyperactive Magnetar Eruptions: Giant Flares, Baryon Ejections, and Fast Radio Bursts

    Bransgrove, A., Beloborodov, A. M., & Levin, Y. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.13419, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.13419

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.13419 2025

  14. [14]

    Calebet al., arXiv:2508.01648 [astro-ph.HE] (2025)

    Caleb, M., Nanayakkara, T., Stappers, B., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.01648, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.01648 CHIME/FRB, Amiri, M., Andersen, B. C., et al. 2025, CHIME/FRB Outriggers: Design Overview, https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05192 CHIME/FRB Collaboration. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 257, 59, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac33a...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.01648 2025

  15. [15]

    2019, MNRAS, 487, 5753, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1666

    Connor, L. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 5753, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1666

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1666 2019

  16. [16]

    2016a, MNRAS, 460, 1054, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw907

    Connor, L., Lin, H.-H., Masui, K., et al. 2016a, MNRAS, 460, 1054, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw907

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw907

  17. [17]

    2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 521, 4024–4038, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad667

    Connor, L., & Ravi, V. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 521, 4024–4038, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad667

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad667 2023

  18. [18]

    2016b, MNRAS, 458, L19, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slv124

    Connor, L., Sievers, J., & Pen, U.-L. 2016b, MNRAS, 458, L19, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slv124

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv124

  19. [19]

    A., Kulkarni, S

    Connor, L., Shila, K. A., Kulkarni, S. R., et al. 2021, PASP, 133, 075001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac0bcc

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ac0bcc 2021

  20. [20]

    2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 1226, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02566-y

    Connor, L., Ravi, V., Sharma, K., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 1226, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02566-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02566-y 2025

  21. [21]

    M., Bhardwaj, M., Gaensler, B

    Cook, A. M., Bhardwaj, M., Gaensler, B. M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 946, 58, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbbd0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbbd0 2023

  22. [22]

    V., Machia, L., et al

    Corbett, H., Soto, A. V., Machia, L., et al. 2022, The sky at one terabit per second: Architecture and implementation of the Argus Array Hierarchical Data Processing System, https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.14304

    work page arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    M., & Chatterjee, S

    Cordes, J. M., & Chatterjee, S. 2019, ARA&A, 57, 417, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104501

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104501 2019

  24. [24]

    Davis, I. E. 2025, PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, doi: 10.7907/7ht6-sf52 de Oliveira-Costa, A., Tegmark, M., Gaensler, B. M., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 388, 247, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13376.x de Ruiter, I., Rajwade, K. M., Bassa, C. G., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 672–684, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02491-0

    work page doi:10.7907/7ht6-sf52 2025

  25. [25]

    2025, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 979, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad9de2

    Eftekhari, T., Dong, Y., Fong, W., et al. 2025, ApJL, 979, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad9de2

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad9de2 2025

  26. [26]

    2017, ApJ, 850, 159, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8b70

    Eichler, D. 2017, ApJ, 850, 159, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8b70

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8b70 2017

  27. [27]

    Goldsmith, P. F. 2008, Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation, 2, 1340001

    2008

  28. [28]

    2025, An Analog Front End for the Coherent All-Sky Monitor,

    Gutierrez, M. 2025, An Analog Front End for the Coherent All-Sky Monitor,

    2025

  29. [29]

    doi:10.1103/kclp-x5j1 , archiveprefix =

    Hadzhiyska, B., Ferraro, S., Ried Guachalla, B., et al. 2025, PhRvD, 112, 083509, doi: 10.1103/kclp-x5j1 24

    work page doi:10.1103/kclp-x5j1 2025

  30. [30]

    2023, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol

    Hallinan, G., Anderson, M., Isella, A., et al. 2023, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 241, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #241, 451.09

    2023

  31. [31]

    The DSA-2000 -- A Radio Survey Camera

    Hallinan, G., Ravi, V., Weinreb, S., et al. 2019, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 51, 255, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1907.07648

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.07648 2019

  32. [32]

    Hansen, B. M. S., & Lyutikov, M. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 695, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04103.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04103.x 2001

  33. [33]

    Collins, R. A. 1968, Nature, 217, 709, doi: 10.1038/217709a0

    work page doi:10.1038/217709a0 1968

  34. [34]

    F., & Wills, D

    Hewish, A., Scott, P. F., & Wills, D. 1964, Nature, 203, 1214, doi: 10.1038/2031214a0

    work page doi:10.1038/2031214a0 1964

  35. [35]

    2016, Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation, 5, 1641001, doi: 10.1142/S2251171716410014

    Hickish, J., Abdurashidova, Z., Ali, Z., et al. 2016, Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation, 5, 1641001, doi: 10.1142/S2251171716410014

    work page doi:10.1142/s2251171716410014 2016

  36. [36]

    D., et al

    Hiramatsu, D., Berger, E., Metzger, B. D., et al. 2023, ApJL, 947, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acae98

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acae98 2023

  37. [37]

    2022, Nature, 601, 526, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04272-x

    Hurley-Walker, N., Zhang, X., Bahramian, A., et al. 2022, Nature, 601, 526–530, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04272-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04272-x 2022

  38. [38]

    W., Prochaska, J

    James, C. W., Prochaska, J. X., Macquart, J. P., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 509, 4775, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3051

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3051 2022

  39. [39]

    2007, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 24, 174–188, doi: 10.1071/as07033

    Johnston, S., Bailes, M., Bartel, N., et al. 2007, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 24, 174–188, doi: 10.1071/as07033

    work page doi:10.1071/as07033 2007

  40. [40]

    Jonas, J. L. 2009, IEEE Proceedings, 97, 1522, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2020713

    work page doi:10.1109/jproc.2009.2020713 2009

  41. [41]

    Kader et al

    Kader, Z., Leung, C., Dobbs, M., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2204.06014. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.06014

    work page arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    P., Jenkins, M., et al

    Kirsten, F., Snelders, M. P., Jenkins, M., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 414, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-01246-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-020-01246-3 2021

  43. [43]

    2022, Nature, 602, 585, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04354-w

    Kirsten, F., Marcote, B., Nimmo, K., et al. 2022, Nature, 602, 585, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04354-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04354-w 2022

  44. [44]

    2019, MNRAS, 489, 919, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2219

    Kocz, J., Ravi, V., Catha, M., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 919, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2219

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2219 2019

  45. [45]

    M., Connor, L., Semenov, V

    Konietzka, R. M., Connor, L., Semenov, V. A., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.07090, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.07090

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.07090 2025

  46. [46]

    2025, ApJ, 985, 265, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add014

    Kosogorov, N., Hallinan, G., Law, C., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 265, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add014

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add014 2025

  47. [47]

    and Bulla, Mattia and Dietrich, Tim and Pang, Peter T

    Kunnumkai, K., Palmese, A., Farah, A. M., et al. 2025, ApJ, 993, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0336

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0336 2025

  48. [48]

    2010, The Astronomical Journal, 139, 1154–1167, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/3/1154

    Landon, J., Elmer, M., Waldron, J., et al. 2010, The Astronomical Journal, 139, 1154–1167, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/3/1154

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/139/3/1154 2010

  49. [49]

    J., Sharma, K., Ravi, V., et al

    Law, C. J., Sharma, K., Ravi, V., et al. 2024, ApJ, 967, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3736

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3736 2024

  50. [50]

    and Corbett, Hank and Galliher, Nathan W

    Law, N. M., Corbett, H., Galliher, N. W., et al. 2022, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 134, 035003, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac4811

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ac4811 2022

  51. [51]

    Lee, Y. W. J., Caleb, M., Murphy, T., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 393–405, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02452-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02452-z 2025

  52. [52]

    2021, AJ, 161, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abd174

    Leung, C., Mena-Parra, J., Masui, K., et al. 2021, AJ, 161, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abd174

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd174 2021

  53. [53]

    Leunget al., Constraining primordial black holes using fast radio burst gravitational-lens interferometry with CHIME/FRB, Phys

    Leung, C., Kader, Z., Masui, K. W., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2204.06001. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.06001

    work page arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    2025, ApJL, 991, L25, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae044d

    Leung, C., Simha, S., Medlock, I., et al. 2025, ApJL, 991, L25, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae044d

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae044d 2025

  55. [55]

    F., Wang, P., et al

    Li, C. K., Lin, L., Xiong, S. L., et al. 2020, Nature, 587, 63, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2839-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2839-y 2020

  56. [56]

    Li, D., Yalinewich, A., & Breysse, P. C. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1902.10120, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1902.10120

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.10120 2019

  57. [57]

    2009, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 57, 2180, doi: 10.1109/TAP.2009.2021967

    Li, R., Wu, T., Pan, B., et al. 2009, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 57, 2180, doi: 10.1109/TAP.2009.2021967

    work page doi:10.1109/tap.2009.2021967 2009

  58. [58]

    2016, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 29, 1065, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2016.04.018

    Li, W., Lin, J., Zhang, Y., & Chen, Z. 2016, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 29, 1065, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2016.04.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cja.2016.04.018 2016

  59. [59]

    2022, PASP, 134, 094106, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac8f71

    Lin, H.-H., Lin, K.-y., Li, C.-T., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 094106, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac8f71

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ac8f71 2022

  60. [60]

    Back-End System of BURSTT

    Lin, K.-Y., Wen, C.-Y., Jiang, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.07300. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07300

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    R., Bailes, M., McLaughlin, M

    Lorimer, D. R., Bailes, M., McLaughlin, M. A., Narkevic, D. J., & Crawford, F. 2007, Science, 318, 777, doi: 10.1126/science.1147532

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1147532 2007

  62. [62]

    2024, PASA, 41, e109, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2024.108

    Luo, R., Ekers, R., Hobbs, G., et al. 2024, PASA, 41, e109, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2024.108

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2024.108 2024

  63. [63]

    P., Prochaska, J

    Macquart, J.-P., Prochaska, J. X., McQuinn, M., et al. 2020, Nature, 581, 391, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2300-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2300-2 2020

  64. [64]

    2022, PRECISE localizations of repeating Fast Radio Bursts, https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.11644

    Paragi, Z. 2022, PRECISE localizations of repeating Fast Radio Bursts, https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.11644

    work page arXiv 2022

  65. [65]

    Marcote, B., Paragi, Z., Hessels, J. W. T., et al. 2017, ApJL, 834, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/834/2/L8

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/834/2/l8 2017

  66. [66]

    Marcote, B., Nimmo, K., Hessels, J. W. T., et al. 2020, Nature, 577, 190, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1866-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1866-z 2020

  67. [67]

    McCarty, S., Connor, L., & Konietzka, R. M. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.16781, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.16781

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.16781 2026

  68. [68]

    2023, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 9, 038001, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.9.3.038001

    Merry, B. 2023, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 9, 038001, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.9.3.038001

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.9.3.038001 2023

  69. [69]

    D., Margalit, B., & Sironi, L

    Metzger, B. D., Margalit, B., & Sironi, L. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 4091, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz700 25

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz700 2019

  70. [70]

    D., & Romein, J

    Mol, J. D., & Romein, J. W. 2011, The LOF AR Beam Former: Implementation and Performance Analysis, https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.0661

    work page arXiv 2011

  71. [71]

    M., Bhandari, S., Drout, M

    Moroianu, A. M., Bhandari, S., Drout, M. R., et al. 2026, ApJL, 996, L16, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae28c7 Muñoz, J. B., Kovetz, E. D., Dai, L., & Kamionkowski, M. 2016, Physical Review Letters, 117, doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.117.091301

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae28c7 2026

  72. [72]

    2021, Universe, 7, 76, doi: 10.3390/universe7030076

    Nicastro, L., Guidorzi, C., Palazzi, E., et al. 2021, Universe, 7, 76, doi: 10.3390/universe7030076

    work page doi:10.3390/universe7030076 2021

  73. [73]

    2025, Nature, 637, 48, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08297-w

    Nimmo, K., Pleunis, Z., Beniamini, P., et al. 2025, Nature, 637, 48, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08297-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08297-w 2025

  74. [74]

    2022, Nature, 606, 873, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04755-5

    Niu, C. H., Aggarwal, K., Li, D., et al. 2022, Nature, 606, 873, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04755-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04755-5 2022

  75. [75]

    K., Cordes, J

    Ocker, S. K., Cordes, J. M., & Chatterjee, S. 2020, ApJ, 897, 124, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab98f9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab98f9 2020

  76. [76]

    2021, Nature, 596, 505, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03724-8

    Pastor-Marazuela, I., Connor, L., van Leeuwen, J., et al. 2021, Nature, 596, 505, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03724-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03724-8 2021

  77. [77]

    2004, Forecast for Epoch-of-Reionization as viewable by the PrimevAl Structure Telescope (PAST), https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0404083

    Pen, U.-L., Xiang-Ping, W., & Peterson, J. 2004, Forecast for Epoch-of-Reionization as viewable by the PrimevAl Structure Telescope (PAST), https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0404083

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2004

  78. [78]

    Petroff, E., Hessels, J. W. T., & Lorimer, D. R. 2022, A&A Rv, 30, 2, doi: 10.1007/s00159-022-00139-w

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-022-00139-w 2022

  79. [79]

    C., Kaspi, V

    Pleunis, Z., Good, D. C., Kaspi, V. M., et al. 2021a, ApJ, 923, 1, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac33ac

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac33ac

  80. [80]

    G., et al

    Pleunis, Z., Michilli, D., Bassa, C. G., et al. 2021b, ApJL, 911, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abec72

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abec72 2041

Showing first 80 references.