pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14278 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Controlled Loop Expansion for the Topological Heavy Fermion Model

Yaar Vituri , Erez Berg This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords heavy fermion modeltwisted bilayer grapheneloop expansionCurie-Weiss lawflavor susceptibilityquasi-particle lifetimehybridization
0
0 comments X

The pith

A controlled loop expansion shows the flavor susceptibility obeys a Curie-Weiss law close to the Curie temperature in the topological heavy fermion model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a controlled theoretical framework for the topological heavy fermion model by tracing out the localized electrons to derive an effective action for the conduction electrons. This effective action contains long-range interactions in time built from single f-site correlators, and a small hybridization-phase-space parameter makes a loop expansion controlled and valid above the flavor ordering temperature but below the on-site charging energy. The expansion yields the quasi-particle lifetime at higher orders and shows that the flavor susceptibility follows a Curie-Weiss law parametrically close to the Curie temperature despite strong interactions. This approach recovers the Hubbard I approximation at tree level and provides nonperturbative access in either the interaction or hybridization strength.

Core claim

Tracing out the localized electrons produces an effective theory for the conduction band electrons with interactions derived from single-site f-electron correlators. A small hybridization phase space parameter permits a loop expansion valid between the flavor ordering temperature and the charging energy scale. Within this expansion the flavor susceptibility is found to obey a Curie-Weiss law parametrically close to the Curie temperature, and the quasi-particle lifetime is obtained.

What carries the argument

The controlled loop expansion of the effective action for conduction electrons, obtained by tracing out the f-sites and controlled by a small hybridization-phase-space parameter.

Load-bearing premise

There exists a small hybridization-phase-space parameter that makes the loop expansion controlled for temperatures above the flavor ordering temperature but below the on-site charging energy.

What would settle it

A measurement of the flavor susceptibility in a device realizing the topological heavy fermion model that shows clear deviation from Curie-Weiss form at temperatures slightly above the ordering transition would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14278 by Erez Berg, Yaar Vituri.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: a) A diagrammatic representation of the c electron propagator within Hubbard I (tree-level) approximation (G I c ) and to one-loop order (G loop c ), expressed diagrammatically in terms of the un-hybridized (ˆγ = 0) theory. G 0 f,2 represents the connected two-body Green’s function of the f electrons. The one loop self-energy encodes information about correlation in the f-site beyond its single-particle pr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: a) Leading contributions to the c self-energy, also expressed as Σc = ˆγ †Dγˆ. b) The fully dressed Gc expressed in terms of ˆγ, D and G 0 c. c) Gf computed in the fully-hybridized theory from the effective action containing only c-electrons. the quadratic terms Sc and Γ(1) exactly, which repro￾duces the Hubbard I propagator (see Subsection V A and Fig. 1c). By treating all other Γ(n) interaction terms wit… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: a) The set of diagrams accounted for in the ‘single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Graphic representation of two different five [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Self-consistently solved spectral function, as defined in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: a) Example of diagrams contributing to the flavor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The eigenvalues of the Curie temperature matrix [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a controlled theoretical framework for the topological heavy fermion model relevant to magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, where low density conduction electrons hybridize with a lattice of strongly interacting f-sites. By tracing out the localized electrons, we derive an effective action for the conduction electrons with long-range in time effective interactions, built from correlators of the single f-site problem. We identify a small hybridization-phase-space parameter resulting in a controlled loop expansion, enabling the derivation of nonperturbative results in either the interaction or the hybridization strength. To tree-level, the results are equivalent to the Hubbard I approximation. At higher loop order, we derive two key results applicable to temperatures above the flavor ordering temperature and below the on-site charging energy: 1) the quasi-particle lifetime, 2) the flavor susceptibility of the system. Remarkably, despite being strongly interacting, we find the susceptibility to accurately obey a Curie-Weiss law parametrically close to the Curie temperature.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper develops a controlled loop expansion for the topological heavy fermion model relevant to magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene. By tracing out the localized f-electrons, it derives an effective action for conduction electrons with long-range temporal interactions constructed from single-site f-correlators. A small hybridization-phase-space parameter is identified that controls the expansion, with tree-level results equivalent to the Hubbard-I approximation. At higher loop orders, the quasi-particle lifetime and flavor susceptibility are computed for temperatures above the flavor-ordering temperature and below the on-site charging energy U; the susceptibility is found to obey a Curie-Weiss law accurately and parametrically close to the Curie temperature.

Significance. If the claimed control of the loop expansion holds, the work supplies a valuable analytic framework for strongly interacting moiré systems that bridges perturbative and non-perturbative regimes without ad-hoc fitting. The explicit construction of the effective interaction from the isolated f-site problem and the resulting non-perturbative susceptibility result constitute clear strengths. The approach is potentially generalizable to other heavy-fermion models and could guide numerical studies of magic-angle graphene.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; section on effective action and loop expansion] The hybridization-phase-space parameter whose smallness is asserted to control the loop expansion is introduced in the abstract and the section deriving the effective action, but no explicit parametric bound or numerical evaluation of its magnitude is given inside the window T_flavor < T << U. This parameter is load-bearing for the central claim that higher-loop corrections to the susceptibility remain small and that the Curie-Weiss form is accurate parametrically close to the Curie temperature.
  2. [Section deriving higher-loop susceptibility] The higher-loop result for the flavor susceptibility (leading to the Curie-Weiss law) is presented without an accompanying estimate of the size of the first correction term relative to the tree-level contribution. An explicit check that this correction is parametrically suppressed near the Curie temperature is required to substantiate the claim of accurate adherence to Curie-Weiss despite strong interactions.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Notation and definitions] The notation for the hybridization-phase-space parameter and the flavor indices could be introduced with an explicit equation number at first appearance to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and for the constructive major comments. We agree that the control of the loop expansion would be more convincingly demonstrated with explicit bounds and estimates, and we will revise the manuscript to address both points.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract; section on effective action and loop expansion] The hybridization-phase-space parameter whose smallness is asserted to control the loop expansion is introduced in the abstract and the section deriving the effective action, but no explicit parametric bound or numerical evaluation of its magnitude is given inside the window T_flavor < T << U. This parameter is load-bearing for the central claim that higher-loop corrections to the susceptibility remain small and that the Curie-Weiss form is accurate parametrically close to the Curie temperature.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit parametric bound and evaluation of the hybridization-phase-space parameter in the window T_flavor < T << U is needed to substantiate the control of the expansion. Although the smallness follows from the separation between the hybridization scale and the on-site U (with the parameter scaling as the phase space available for hybridization processes), this was not quantified numerically or parametrically in the relevant temperature range. In the revised manuscript we will add a short derivation and estimate showing that the parameter remains O(0.1) or smaller throughout the window, thereby justifying the truncation at low loop orders. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section deriving higher-loop susceptibility] The higher-loop result for the flavor susceptibility (leading to the Curie-Weiss law) is presented without an accompanying estimate of the size of the first correction term relative to the tree-level contribution. An explicit check that this correction is parametrically suppressed near the Curie temperature is required to substantiate the claim of accurate adherence to Curie-Weiss despite strong interactions.

    Authors: We concur that the absence of an explicit estimate for the leading correction leaves the claim of parametric accuracy near the Curie temperature incompletely supported. In the revision we will evaluate the first higher-loop diagram for the susceptibility, compare its magnitude to the tree-level (Hubbard-I) term, and show that the relative correction remains small (suppressed by the hybridization-phase-space parameter) as T approaches T_Curie from above, consistent with the controlled expansion. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation proceeds from Hamiltonian via integration and loop expansion without reducing to inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper constructs the effective action by tracing out f-electrons from the model Hamiltonian, using single-site correlators to generate long-range interactions for conduction electrons. A hybridization-phase-space parameter is identified to control the loop expansion, with tree-level results matching the known Hubbard-I approximation and higher orders yielding lifetime and susceptibility expressions. The Curie-Weiss form for susceptibility emerges from this controlled expansion above the flavor-ordering temperature, rather than being assumed or fitted. No equations reduce the claimed results to the inputs by construction, no load-bearing self-citations are invoked for uniqueness or ansatz, and the central claims remain independent of the target observables. This is a standard non-circular derivation from first principles.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the applicability of the topological heavy fermion model to the physical system and on the smallness of the hybridization phase-space parameter; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The topological heavy fermion model accurately captures the low-energy physics of magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene
    The paper takes this model as its starting point without deriving it.
  • ad hoc to paper A small hybridization-phase-space parameter exists and renders the loop expansion controlled
    Identified by the authors as the key to the controlled expansion.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5457 in / 1397 out tokens · 54196 ms · 2026-05-10T12:10:31.913963+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Controlled expansion for correlated electrons with concentrated kinematics

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    A controlled expansion in s² for electrons with concentrated kinematics allows analytical calculations of spectral broadening, T-linear resistivity in bad metals, and spectral functions in Mott semimetals for Hubbard ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

126 extracted references · 126 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    We hereby focus on the long-time behavior leading to a finite scattering rate at one-loop order, with the full expression given in App

    ¯f1 (τ ′ 1)⟩c,0 ≡ ⟨f1f2 ¯f2 ¯f1⟩0 − ⟨f1 ¯f1⟩0 ⟨f2 ¯f2⟩0 +⟨f 2 ¯f1⟩0 ⟨f1 ¯f2⟩0 .(31) We implicitly take allfand ¯fto be at the same position Ri, as the cumulant vanishes otherwise. We hereby focus on the long-time behavior leading to a finite scattering rate at one-loop order, with the full expression given in App. C. The dominant contribution to this cumu...

    work page

  2. [2]

    ¯f1 (τ ′ 1)⟩c,0 ≈ − 1−(2ν/N f)2 4(1−N −1 f ) × h Θ(τ2 −τ ′ 1)e−E+(τ2−τ ′

    work page

  3. [3]

    + Θ(τ′ 1 −τ 2)e−E−(τ ′ 1−τ2) i × h Θ(τ1 −τ ′ 2)e−E+(τ1−τ ′

    work page

  4. [4]

    (32) The filling dependent pre-factor accounts for the proba- bility to finds a state with (b 1, λ1) occupied and (b 2, λ2) empty or vice versa

    + Θ(τ′ 2 −τ 1)e−E−(τ ′ 2−τ1) i . (32) The filling dependent pre-factor accounts for the proba- bility to finds a state with (b 1, λ1) occupied and (b 2, λ2) empty or vice versa. The case of (b 1, λ1) = (b 2, λ2) is different due to the non-vanishing disconnected part (see App. C for details). We will neglect contribution of the same flavor-orbital type, a...

    work page

  5. [5]

    (33), neglecting other contri- butions to⟨f 1f2 ¯f2 ¯f1⟩

    ¯f1 (τ ′ 1)⟩c,0 →0.(34) Following these arguments we will approximate Γ (2) using the expression in Eq. (33), neglecting other contri- butions to⟨f 1f2 ¯f2 ¯f1⟩. Later in the text we take a similar approach to analyze contribution from Γ (n) withn >2 by considering similar multiple flavor-flips processes. C. One Loop Order To one loop order, the only diag...

    work page

  6. [6]

    instantons

    In the limitβE ±, Nf ≫1, the dominant contributions toDfrom a single Γ (m) vertex insertion (see Fig. 3.b) is described by multi-instanton (flavor-flip) processes. 2) These instantons admit a canonical ordering according to the flavors of the created and annihilatedfelectrons, in- dependently of their time ordering. 3) Within this canon- ical ordering, ex...

    work page

  7. [7]

    In the third line we took the limit of temperatures far below the charging energy βE± ≫1

    work page

  8. [8]

    One-Loop Corrections Within one-loop order we have two contributing dia- grams, given in the first line of Fig. 6.a. We can infer the maximal power of 1 T contributed by each diagram by considering the number of free (unconstrained) times we integrate over. For example: the zero-loops contribution has a term independent ofδτ=τ−τ ′, and therefore scales as...

    work page

  9. [9]

    χsingle-site 1−β ˆΘ(λ,λ′) q # b,b′ = 1− 2ν Nf 2 4(1−N −1 f )

    Ladder-Resummation We assume thatT∼s 2u, and search for all diagrams which contribution scale as 1 T s2u T nloops ∼ 1 T . As men- tioned before, the power of 1/Tcan be identified by counting the number of unconstrained times integrated over, whereas the power ofs 2 is the number of loops. In Fig. 6.a we specify the scaling of each of the new type of diagr...

    work page

  10. [10]

    (65) cannot be correct all the way down to the phase tran- sition att≡ T−T c Tc = 0

    Critical fluctuation Regime Universality of critical behavior tells us that Eq. (65) cannot be correct all the way down to the phase tran- sition att≡ T−T c Tc = 0. Motivated by this fact we look for sets of diagrams which amount to non-negligible corrections to the susceptibility at small reduced tem- peratures. To find these diagrams we replace bubbles ...

    work page

  11. [11]

    ,Γ(mn) drawn from the effective action (14), withm i ≥1

    Setup: general self-energy diagram A general diagram contributing to Σ c is built fromninteraction vertices Γ (m1), . . . ,Γ(mn) drawn from the effective action (14), withm i ≥1. Each vertex Γ (mi) carriesm i incoming andm i outgoingc-electron legs. For a self-energy diagram, twoc-legs (one incoming, one outgoing) are left external and all remaining legs ...

    work page

  12. [12]

    Subtracting the 2 external endpoints and pairing the remainder into internalc-propagators gives P= nX i=1 mi −1 (B2) internalc-electron propagators

    Counting propagators and loops Thenvertices contribute a total of 2 Pn i=1 mi c-leg endpoints. Subtracting the 2 external endpoints and pairing the remainder into internalc-propagators gives P= nX i=1 mi −1 (B2) internalc-electron propagators. For a connected diagram the number of independent loops is then nl =P−n+ 1 = nX i=1 mi −n.(B3)

    work page

  13. [13]

    (24)) Gc,λ(k, iω) = −iω ω2 1 + γ2 ω2 +u 2 +v 2⋆|k|2 .(B4) Introducing the dimensionless variables ˜ω=ω/uand ˜k=k/k BZ, and usings 2 =γ 2/(v⋆kBZ)2 whereπk 2 BZ =A BZ (Eq

    Scaling form ofG c in the flat-chiral limit In the flat-chiral limit the Hubbard-Ic-propagator takes the form (Eq. (24)) Gc,λ(k, iω) = −iω ω2 1 + γ2 ω2 +u 2 +v 2⋆|k|2 .(B4) Introducing the dimensionless variables ˜ω=ω/uand ˜k=k/k BZ, and usings 2 =γ 2/(v⋆kBZ)2 whereπk 2 BZ =A BZ (Eq. (27)), the denominator can be rewritten to read Gc,λ(k, iω) = u γ2 gc ˜k...

    work page

  14. [14]

    Power counting We now assemble the scaling of a general self-energy diagram. 18 a. Vertices.From the definition Eq. (15), each vertex Γ (mi) contains 2m i hybridization factors (contributing γ2mi) multiplied by the connectedf-electron 2m i-point correlator, with units of (energy) −mi. Since the only energy scales in the 2m i-point correlator areuandT, we ...

    work page

  15. [15]

    ¯f1 (τ ′ 1)⟩c,0 = ⟨f1 (τ1)f 2 (τ2) ¯f2 (τ ′

    work page

  16. [16]

    Below we give the expression for the full four-point function

    ¯f1 (τ ′ 1)⟩0 − ⟨f1(τ1) ¯f1(τ ′ 1)⟩0 ⟨f2(τ2) ¯f2(τ ′ 2)⟩0 +⟨f 1(τ1) ¯f2(τ ′ 2)⟩0 ⟨f2(τ2) ¯f1(τ ′ 1)⟩0 .(C1) The two-point function is given by⟨f 1(τ) ¯f2(τ ′)⟩0 =δ λ1,λ2 δb1,b2 ˜G0 f(τ−τ ′), with ˜G0 f(τ−τ ′) defined in the text. Below we give the expression for the full four-point function. 7 Such a logarithmic factor appears in the one-loop diagram; see...

    work page

  17. [17]

    Different Flavor-Orbitals The four point function with different flavor-orbital combinations (λ 1, b1)̸= (λ 2, b2) is given by ⟨f1 (τ1)f 2 (τ2) ¯f2 (τ ′

    work page

  18. [18]

    ¯f1 (τ ′ 1)⟩0 =    A1 exp [−E+ (τ1 −τ ′ 1 +τ 2 −τ ′ 2)−U(min{τ 1, τ2} −max{τ ′ 1, τ ′ 2})] (τ 1, τ2)>(τ ′ 1, τ ′

    work page

  19. [19]

    (a) A2 exp [−E− (τ ′ 1 −τ 1 +τ ′ 2 −τ 2)−U(min{τ ′ 1, τ ′ 2} −max{τ 1, τ2})] (τ ′ 1, τ ′ 2)>(τ 1, τ2) (b) −A3 ˜Gins (τ2 −τ ′

    work page

  20. [20]

    (τ 1, τ ′ 2)≷(τ ′ 1, τ2) (c) A4 ˜G0 f (τ2 −τ ′

    work page

  21. [21]

    ˜Gins and ˜Gf,0 are the flavor-flip instanton propagator and single-bodyfpropagator defined in the main text

    (τ 2, τ ′ 2)≷(τ ′ 1, τ1) (d) (C2) whereE ± are the single-body doublon like and holon like excitation energies as defined in the main text. ˜Gins and ˜Gf,0 are the flavor-flip instanton propagator and single-bodyfpropagator defined in the main text. (a, b)>(c, d) denotes min{a, b}>max{c, d}. The combinatorial factors are given byA 1 = (1−n)(1−n−N −1 f ) 1...

    work page

  22. [22]

    ¯f1 (ω′ 1)⟩0 ≡2πδ(ω 1 +ω 2 −ω ′ 1 −ω ′ 2)G↑↓(ω1, ω2;ω ′ 1, ω′ 2), we find G(ω1, ω2;ω ′ 1, ω′

    work page

  23. [23]

    = A1 2 (U−δµ)−i(ω 1 +ω 2) 1 E+ −iω 1 + 1 E+ −iω 2 1 E+ −iω ′ 1 + 1 E+ −iω ′ 2 + A2 2 (U+δµ) +i(ω ′ 1 +ω ′ 2) 1 E− +iω 1 + 1 E− +iω 2 1 E− +iω ′ 1 + 1 E− +iω ′ 2 −A3δω1,ω′ 2 Gins (ω2)G ins (ω1) + A3 (E+ −iω 1) (E+ −iω ′

    work page

  24. [24]

    + A3 (E− +iω 1) (E− +iω ′

    work page

  25. [25]

    (E− +iω ′ 2) + A3 (E+ −iω 1) (E− +iω ′ 1) 1 E+ −iω ′ 2 + 1 E− +iω 2 + A3 (E+ −iω 2) (E− +iω ′ 2) 1 E+ −iω ′ 1 + 1 E− +iω 1 + 1 i(ω 1 −ω ′ 1) A1 (E+ −iω 1) (E+ −iω ′

    work page

  26. [26]

    (E+ −iω 2) + A2 (E− +iω ′

    work page

  27. [27]

    (E− +iω 2) − A2 (E− +iω 1) (E− +iω ′

    work page

  28. [28]

    + A3 (E+ −iω 1) (E− +iω 2) − A3 (E+ −iω ′

    work page

  29. [29]

    (E− +iω ′ 2) + A3 (E− +iω ′

    work page

  30. [30]

    − A3 (E− +iω 1) (E+ −iω 2) (C3) Physically, time orderings (a),(b) correspond to a double excitation by injecting two electrons/holes to a single site. Time ordering (c) correspond to a generalized flavor flip, where at timeτ ′ 1 ∼τ 2 an electron of flavor-orbital (λ 1, b1) is added and an electron of flavor-orbital (λ 2, b2) is taken out of the site, whi...

    work page

  31. [31]

    We have ⟨f1 (τ1)f 1 (τ2) ¯f1 (τ ′

    Same Flavor-Orbitals For completeness we hereby give the expression for the four-point function at identical flavor-orbitals (λ 1, b1) = (λ2, b2). We have ⟨f1 (τ1)f 1 (τ2) ¯f1 (τ ′

    work page

  32. [32]

    ¯f1 (τ ′ 1)⟩0 = ( 1+sgn(τ1−τ ′

    work page

  33. [33]

    sgn(τ2−τ ′ 2) 1+(1−2n) sgn(τ1−τ ′ 1) ˜G0 f (τ2 −τ ′

    work page

  34. [34]

    (τ 2, τ ′ 2)≷(τ 1, τ ′ 1) − 1+sgn(τ2−τ ′

    work page

  35. [35]

    sgn(τ1−τ ′ 2) 1+(1−2n) sgn(τ2−τ ′ 1) ˜G0 f (τ1 −τ ′

    work page

  36. [36]

    Any other process is forbidden by fermionic statistics

    (τ 1, τ ′ 2)≷(τ 2, τ ′ 1) .(C4) Physically this amounts to two consecutive electron-like or two consecutive holon-like excitations. Any other process is forbidden by fermionic statistics. In Matsubara frequencies, expressing⟨f 1 (ω1)f 1 (ω2) ¯f1 (ω′

    work page

  37. [37]

    ¯f1 (ω′ 1)⟩0 ≡2πδ(ω 1 +ω 2 −ω ′ 1 −ω ′ 2)G↑↑(ω1, ω2;ω ′ 1, ω′ 2), we find G(ω1, ω2;ω ′ 1, ω′

    work page

  38. [38]

    = 1 i(ω 1 −ω ′ 1) 1−n (E+ −iω 1) (E+ −iω ′

    work page

  39. [39]

    (E+ −iω 2) + n (E− +iω ′

    work page

  40. [40]

    (E− +iω 2) − n (E− +iω 1) (E− +iω ′ 2) −(ω 1 ↔ω 2).(C5) Appendix D: LargeNVertex Resummation Consider them−1 loops contribution to the self energy from inserting a single Γ (m) vertex. Denotingx= (τ,R) we have X R,R′ ˆ τ,τ ′ ˜G0 c(x′ 0 −x) ˜Σm−1(x−x ′) ˜G0 c(x′ −x 0) = 1 (m!)2 ˆ {τi},{τ ′ i } X {λi,ai,Ri} {λ′ i,a′ i,R′ i} Γ(m) 1···m 1′···m′ [⟨¯c0c0′¯cm · ...

    work page

  41. [41]

    analytical continuation of convolution Consider a functiong(ω) and its spectral functionA g(ω) =− 1 π Im [g(ω+i0 +)] admitting Lehmann’s representation, such that we can expressg(z) = ´ dω′ Ag(ω′) z−ω ′ (withzbeing an abitrary complex number). We find 2 iΩ ⊛g(iΩ) = ˆ dΩ′ 2π 2 i(Ω−Ω ′) ˆ dω′′ Ag(ω′′) iΩ′ −ω ′′ = ˆ dω′′ Ag(ω′′) iΩ−ω ′′ sgn(ω′′).(D4) After W...

    work page

  42. [42]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras,et al., Correlated insulator be- haviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlat- tices, Nature556, 80 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    X. Lu, P. Stepanov, W. Yang, M. Xie, M. A. Aamir, I. Das, C. Urgell, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Zhang, et al., Superconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene, Nature574, 653 (2019)

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Codecido, Q

    E. Codecido, Q. Wang, R. Koester, S. Che, H. Tian, R. Lv, S. Tran, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, F. Zhang, et al., Correlated insulating and superconducting states in twisted bilayer graphene below the magic angle, Sci- ence Advances5, eaaw9770 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Saito, J

    Y. Saito, J. Ge, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and A. F. Young, Independent superconductors and correlated in- sulators in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature Physics16, 926 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    A. T. Pierce, Y. Xie, J. M. Park, E. Khalaf, S. H. Lee, Y. Cao, D. E. Parker, P. R. Forrester, S. Chen, K. Watan- abe,et al., Unconventional sequence of correlated chern 24 insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Na- ture Physics17, 1210 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Y. Cao, D. Rodan-Legrain, O. Rubies-Bigorda, J. M. Park, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Tunable correlated states and spin-polarized phases in twisted bilayer–bilayer graphene, Nature583, 215 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    H. Kim, Y. Choi, ´E. Lantagne-Hurtubise, C. Lewandowski, A. Thomson, L. Kong, H. Zhou, E. Baum, Y. Zhang, L. Holleis,et al., Imaging inter- valley coherent order in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene, Nature623, 942 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional super- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture556, 43 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    Yankowitz, S

    M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young, and C. R. Dean, Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Science363, 1059 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    Y. Cao, D. Rodan-Legrain, J. M. Park, N. F. Yuan, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. M. Fernandes, L. Fu, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Nematicity and competing orders in superconducting magic-angle graphene, science372, 264 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    H. Tian, X. Gao, Y. Zhang, S. Che, T. Xu, P. Che- ung, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Randeria, F. Zhang, et al., Evidence for dirac flat band superconductivity en- abled by quantum geometry, Nature614, 440 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Stepanov, I

    P. Stepanov, I. Das, X. Lu, A. Fahimniya, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, F. H. Koppens, J. Lischner, L. Levitov, and D. K. Efetov, Untying the insulating and supercon- ducting orders in magic-angle graphene, Nature583, 375 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    H. S. Arora, R. Polski, Y. Zhang, A. Thomson, Y. Choi, H. Kim, Z. Lin, I. Z. Wilson, X. Xu, J.-H. Chu,et al., Superconductivity in metallic twisted bilayer graphene stabilized by wse2, Nature583, 379 (2020)

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    X. Liu, Z. Hao, E. Khalaf, J. Y. Lee, Y. Ronen, H. Yoo, D. Haei Najafabadi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vish- wanath,et al., Tunable spin-polarized correlated states in twisted double bilayer graphene, Nature583, 221 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Z. Hao, A. Zimmerman, P. Ledwith, E. Khalaf, D. H. Najafabadi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vishwanath, and P. Kim, Electric field–tunable superconductivity in alternating-twist magic-angle trilayer graphene, Science 371, 1133 (2021)

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    J. M. Park, Y. Cao, L.-Q. Xia, S. Sun, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Robust supercon- ductivity in magic-angle multilayer graphene family, Na- ture Materials21, 877 (2022)

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    Y. Cao, J. M. Park, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Pauli-limit violation and re-entrant superconductivity in moir´ e graphene, Nature595, 526 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    Banerjee, Z

    A. Banerjee, Z. Hao, M. Kreidel, P. Ledwith, I. Phinney, J. M. Park, A. Zimmerman, M. E. Wesson, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi,et al., Superfluid stiffness of twisted trilayer graphene superconductors, Nature638, 93 (2025)

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    H. Kim, Y. Choi, C. Lewandowski, A. Thomson, Y. Zhang, R. Polski, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Al- icea, and S. Nadj-Perge, Evidence for unconventional su- perconductivity in twisted trilayer graphene, Nature606, 494 (2022)

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    H. Kim, G. Rai, L. Crippa, D. C˘ alug˘ aru, H. Hu, Y. Choi, L. Kong, E. Baum, Y. Zhang, L. Holleis,et al., Resolv- ing intervalley gaps and many-body resonances in moir´ e superconductors, Nature , 1 (2026)

    work page 2026

  62. [62]

    Zondiner, A

    U. Zondiner, A. Rozen, D. Rodan-Legrain, Y. Cao, R. Queiroz, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Oreg, F. von Oppen, A. Stern,et al., Cascade of phase transitions and dirac revivals in magic-angle graphene, Nature582, 203 (2020)

    work page 2020

  63. [63]

    Saito, F

    Y. Saito, F. Yang, J. Ge, X. Liu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, J. Li, E. Berg, and A. F. Young, Isospin pomer- anchuk effect in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature592, 220 (2021)

    work page 2021

  64. [64]

    Rozen, J

    A. Rozen, J. M. Park, U. Zondiner, Y. Cao, D. Rodan- Legrain, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Oreg, A. Stern, E. Berg,et al., Entropic evidence for a pomeranchuk ef- fect in magic-angle graphene, Nature592, 214 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    Zhang, S

    Z. Zhang, S. Wu, D. C˘ alug˘ aru, H. Hu, T. Taniguchi, K. Wanatabe, A. B. Bernevig, and E. Y. Andrei, Heavy fermions, mass renormalization and local moments in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene via planar tun- neling spectroscopy, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.17875 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Y. Choi, J. Kemmer, Y. Peng, A. Thomson, H. Arora, R. Polski, Y. Zhang, H. Ren, J. Alicea, G. Refael,et al., Electronic correlations in twisted bilayer graphene near the magic angle, Nature physics15, 1174 (2019)

    work page 2019

  67. [67]

    Polshyn, M

    H. Polshyn, M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, Y. Zhang, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, C. R. Dean, and A. F. Young, Large linear-in-temperature resistivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature Physics15, 1011 (2019)

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    Y. Cao, D. Chowdhury, D. Rodan-Legrain, O. Rubies- Bigorda, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. Senthil, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Strange metal in magic-angle graphene with near planckian dissipation, Physical review letters 124, 076801 (2020)

    work page 2020

  69. [69]

    Jaoui, I

    A. Jaoui, I. Das, G. Di Battista, J. D´ ıez-M´ erida, X. Lu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, H. Ishizuka, L. Levitov, and D. K. Efetov, Quantum critical behaviour in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature Physics18, 633 (2022)

    work page 2022

  70. [70]

    Grover, M

    S. Grover, M. Bocarsly, A. Uri, P. Stepanov, G. Di Bat- tista, I. Roy, J. Xiao, A. Y. Meltzer, Y. Myasoedov, K. Pareek,et al., Chern mosaic and berry-curvature mag- netism in magic-angle graphene, Nature physics18, 885 (2022)

    work page 2022

  71. [71]

    S. Wu, Z. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and E. Y. Andrei, Chern insulators, van hove singularities and topological flat bands in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature materials20, 488 (2021)

    work page 2021

  72. [72]

    Y. Xie, A. T. Pierce, J. M. Park, D. E. Parker, E. Khalaf, P. Ledwith, Y. Cao, S. H. Lee, S. Chen, P. R. Forrester, et al., Fractional chern insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature600, 439 (2021)

    work page 2021

  73. [73]

    A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, A. W. Barnard, J. Finney, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Kastner, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Emergent ferromagnetism near three-quarters filling in twisted bilayer graphene, Science365, 605 (2019)

    work page 2019

  74. [74]

    Serlin, C

    M. Serlin, C. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. Young, Intrinsic quantized anomalous hall effect in a moir´ e het- erostructure, Science367, 900 (2020)

    work page 2020

  75. [75]

    Stepanov, M

    P. Stepanov, M. Xie, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, X. Lu, 25 A. H. MacDonald, B. A. Bernevig, and D. K. Efetov, Competing zero-field chern insulators in superconduct- ing twisted bilayer graphene, Physical review letters127, 197701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  76. [76]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moir´ e bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences108, 12233 (2011)

    work page 2011

  77. [77]

    F. Wu, A. H. MacDonald, and I. Martin, Theory of phonon-mediated superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Physical review letters121, 257001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  78. [78]

    Tarnopolsky, A

    G. Tarnopolsky, A. J. Kruchkov, and A. Vishwanath, Ori- gin of magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene, Physical review letters122, 106405 (2019)

    work page 2019

  79. [79]

    H. C. Po, L. Zou, T. Senthil, and A. Vishwanath, Faithful tight-binding models and fragile topology of magic-angle bilayer graphene, Physical Review B99, 195455 (2019)

    work page 2019

  80. [80]

    J. S. Hofmann, E. Khalaf, A. Vishwanath, E. Berg, and J. Y. Lee, Fermionic monte carlo study of a realistic model of twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Review X 12, 011061 (2022)

    work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.