pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14312 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Recognition: unknown

An Improved Fit for Linear Halo Bias at High Redshift

Kuan Wang , Julian B. Mu\~noz , L. Y. Aaron Yung
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 11:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords halo biashigh redshiftdark matter haloscosmological simulationsgalaxy clusteringJWSTearly universe
0
0 comments X

The pith

Halo biases at redshifts 6 to 19 are 3 to 4 percent higher than low-redshift calibrations predict.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper measures the linear bias of dark matter halos using N-body simulations at redshifts from 6 to 19. The measured biases turn out 3 to 4 percent larger than the values given by standard fitting formulas calibrated on lower-redshift data. The authors supply a revised fitting formula tuned to these early epochs. With the new formula the average mismatch between prediction and simulation drops below 1 percent. The result matters for turning upcoming observations of high-redshift galaxy clustering into reliable cosmological inferences.

Core claim

We measure dark matter halo biases at z=6-19 from simulation data, and find they are ∼3-4% higher than canonical results calibrated at low z. We provide an updated linear-bias fit at these early times, reducing the mean systematic offset to <1%.

What carries the argument

An updated fitting function for linear halo bias calibrated directly on high-redshift simulation measurements instead of low-redshift extrapolations.

Load-bearing premise

The N-body simulations accurately capture halo formation and clustering physics at z=6-19 without resolution artifacts, missing baryonic effects, or volume limitations that would change the measured linear bias.

What would settle it

A new suite of higher-resolution or larger-volume simulations at z=10-15 that recovers the original low-redshift bias values rather than the new high-redshift fit would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14312 by Julian B. Mu\~noz, Kuan Wang, L. Y. Aaron Yung.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Two representative examples of our correlation function measurements and halo bias determination. The top panels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Measured halo bias–peak height relation and com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Comparison between measurements and fits. Same as Figure 2, but in terms of fractional deviations from the T10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

High- to ultrahigh-redshift clustering of halos provides a powerful tool to understand cosmology and galaxy formation. However, theoretical predictions are not firmly established in the first billion years, where current and upcoming surveys are beginning to reach percent-level precision. Here we measure dark matter halo biases at $z=6$ - 19 from simulation data, and find they are $\sim$ 3 - 4$\%$ higher than canonical results calibrated at low $z$. We provide an updated linear-bias fit at these early times, reducing the mean systematic offset to $< 1\%$. These results will enable robust interpretation of early-Universe galaxy clustering from JWST, Roman, and intensity-mapping surveys.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper measures linear dark matter halo biases from N-body simulations at redshifts z=6 to 19, reports that these biases are 3-4% higher than canonical low-redshift calibrations, and proposes an updated fitting formula for the linear bias that reduces the mean systematic offset to less than 1%.

Significance. If the underlying simulation measurements prove robust and the fit is shown to generalize, the result would be useful for percent-level interpretations of high-redshift halo clustering in JWST, Roman, and intensity-mapping surveys, where current low-z bias fits introduce systematic errors at early times.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and methods description] The abstract and main text provide no information on simulation volume, particle resolution, halo finder algorithm, or the precise procedure used to extract linear bias, leaving the claimed <1% accuracy unsupported by any visible convergence or validation evidence.
  2. [Fitting and comparison section] The updated fit is calibrated directly on the same simulation measurements that were used to identify the original 3-4% offset; the reported reduction to <1% is therefore achieved by construction on the calibration sample, with no independent validation set, cross-validation, or out-of-sample test mentioned.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Updated fit formula] Notation for the bias fit parameters should be defined explicitly with units or normalization conventions to allow immediate use by readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and valuable suggestions. We have carefully considered the major comments and will revise the manuscript to address them. Below we provide point-by-point responses.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and methods description] The abstract and main text provide no information on simulation volume, particle resolution, halo finder algorithm, or the precise procedure used to extract linear bias, leaving the claimed <1% accuracy unsupported by any visible convergence or validation evidence.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that the current manuscript lacks sufficient details on the simulation parameters and the bias measurement procedure. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the methods section to include the simulation volume, particle resolution, the halo finder algorithm employed, and a detailed description of how the linear bias was extracted (e.g., from the ratio of halo-matter power spectra in the linear regime). Additionally, we will include tests demonstrating convergence with respect to resolution and volume to support the accuracy of our measurements and the resulting fit. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Fitting and comparison section] The updated fit is calibrated directly on the same simulation measurements that were used to identify the original 3-4% offset; the reported reduction to <1% is therefore achieved by construction on the calibration sample, with no independent validation set, cross-validation, or out-of-sample test mentioned.

    Authors: The referee correctly points out that the updated fitting formula was derived from the same set of simulation measurements used to quantify the offset relative to low-redshift calibrations. The reduction in systematic offset to less than 1% is indeed the result of fitting to these data. To strengthen the manuscript, we will add a validation section in the revision. This will include either a cross-validation approach by partitioning the redshift range or simulation outputs, or comparison against independent high-redshift simulation suites if accessible. We will also explicitly report the fit residuals and any goodness-of-fit metrics to better substantiate the improvement. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper reports direct measurements of linear halo bias from N-body simulations at z=6-19, compares these to existing low-z calibrations (finding a 3-4% offset), and supplies a new fitting function calibrated to the high-z measurements. This constitutes a standard empirical update to a parametrization rather than any derivation chain that reduces to its own inputs by construction. No equations, self-definitions, fitted quantities relabeled as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the abstract or described claims. The <1% residual offset after refitting is the expected statistical outcome of calibration to the same sample and is not presented as an independent test or prediction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on N-body simulation measurements of halo bias followed by empirical fitting; the simulations themselves assume standard LCDM initial conditions and gravity, while the fit parameters are determined from the simulation output.

free parameters (1)
  • updated linear bias fit coefficients
    Numerical coefficients in the revised bias formula are chosen to minimize the offset against the high-redshift simulation measurements.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard Lambda-CDM cosmology governs the simulations
    The bias measurements assume the usual cold dark matter plus cosmological constant model for initial conditions and gravitational evolution.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5419 in / 1244 out tokens · 37221 ms · 2026-05-10T11:55:29.782551+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    S. D. M. White and M. J. Rees, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.183, 341 (1978)

    1978

  2. [2]

    G. R. Blumenthal, S. M. Faber, J. R. Primack, and M. J. Rees, Nature (London)311, 517 (1984)

    1984

  3. [3]

    Halo Models of Large Scale Structure

    A. Cooray and R. Sheth, Phys. Rep.372, 1 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0206508 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  4. [4]

    Zheng, A

    Z. Zheng, A. A. Berlind, D. H. Weinberg, A. J. Benson, C. M. Baugh, S. Cole, R. Dav´ e, C. S. Frenk, N. Katz, and C. G. Lacey, Astrophys. J.633, 791 (2005), arXiv:astro- ph/0408564 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    Zheng, A

    Z. Zheng, A. L. Coil, and I. Zehavi, Astrophys. J.667, 760 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0703457 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2007

  6. [6]

    R. H. Wechsler and J. L. Tinker, Annu. Rev. Astron. As- trophys.56, 435 (2018), arXiv:1804.03097 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    UniverseMachine: The Correlation between Galaxy Growth and Dark Matter Halo Assembly from z=0-10

    P. Behroozi, R. H. Wechsler, A. P. Hearin, and C. Con- roy, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.488, 3143 (2019), arXiv:1806.07893 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    L. Y. A. Yung, R. S. Somerville, H. C. Ferguson, S. L. Finkelstein, J. P. Gardner, R. Dav´ e, M. B. Bagley, G. Popping, and P. Behroozi, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 515, 5416 (2022), arXiv:2206.13521 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    L. Y. A. Yung, R. S. Somerville, S. L. Finkelstein, P. Behroozi, R. Dav´ e, H. C. Ferguson, J. P. Gardner, G. Popping, S. Malhotra, C. Papovich, J. E. Rhoads, M. B. Bagley, M. Hirschmann, and A. M. Koeke- moer, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.519, 1578 (2023), arXiv:2210.04902 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Kaiser, Astrophys

    N. Kaiser, Astrophys. J. Lett.284, L9 (1984)

    1984

  11. [11]

    H. J. Mo and S. D. M. White, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 282, 347 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9512127 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 1996

  12. [12]

    R. K. Sheth and G. Tormen, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 308, 119 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9901122 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1999

  13. [13]

    Y. P. Jing, Astrophys. J. Lett.503, L9 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9805202 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 1998

  14. [14]

    R. K. Sheth, H. J. Mo, and G. Tormen, Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc.323, 1 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/9907024 [astro- ph]

    work page arXiv 2001

  15. [15]

    J. L. Tinker, B. E. Robertson, A. V. Kravtsov, A. Klypin, M. S. Warren, G. Yepes, and S. Gottl¨ ober, Astrophys. J. 724, 878 (2010), arXiv:1001.3162 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  16. [16]

    Bhattacharya, K

    S. Bhattacharya, K. Heitmann, M. White, Z. Luki´ c, C. Wagner, and S. Habib, Astrophys. J.732, 122 (2011), arXiv:1005.2239 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2011

  17. [17]

    J. D. Cohn and M. White, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 385, 2025 (2008), arXiv:0706.0208 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    C. Jose, C. G. Lacey, and C. M. Baugh, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.463, 270 (2016), arXiv:1509.06715 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    Nasirudin, I

    A. Nasirudin, I. T. Iliev, and K. Ahn, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.494, 3294 (2020), arXiv:1910.12452 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Q. Wang, L. Gao, and C. Meng, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.517, 6004 (2022), arXiv:2206.06313 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    D. S. Reed, R. Bower, C. S. Frenk, A. Jenkins, and T. Theuns, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.394, 624 (2009), arXiv:0804.0004 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2009

  22. [22]

    Mirocha, P

    J. Mirocha, P. La Plante, and A. Liu, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.507, 3872 (2021), arXiv:2012.09189 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    M. Shuntov, P. A. Oesch, S. Toft, R. A. Meyer, A. Covelo- Paz, L. Paquereau, R. Bouwens, G. Brammer, V. Gelli, E. Giovinazzo, T. Herard-Demanche, G. D. Illingworth, C. Mason, R. P. Naidu, A. Weibel, and M. Xiao, Astron. Astrophys.699, A231 (2025), arXiv:2503.14280 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    A. V. Kravtsov and S. Borgani, Annu. Rev. Astron. As- trophys.50, 353 (2012), arXiv:1205.5556 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2012

  25. [25]

    Large-Scale Galaxy Bias

    V. Desjacques, D. Jeong, and F. Schmidt, Phys. Rep. 733, 1 (2018), arXiv:1611.09787 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    J. P. Gardner, J. C. Mather, M. Clampin, R. Doyon, M. A. Greenhouse, H. B. Hammel, J. B. Hutchings, P. Jakobsen, S. J. Lilly, K. S. Long, J. I. Lunine, M. J. McCaughrean, M. Mountain, J. Nella, G. H. Rieke, M. J. Rieke, H.-W. Rix, E. P. Smith, G. Sonneborn, M. Sti- avelli, H. S. Stockman, R. A. Windhorst, and G. S. Wright, Space Sci. Rev.123, 485 (2006), ...

    work page arXiv 2006

  27. [27]

    Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report

    D. Spergel, N. Gehrels, C. Baltay, D. Bennett, J. Breckin- ridge, M. Donahue, A. Dressler, B. S. Gaudi, T. Greene, O. Guyon, C. Hirata, J. Kalirai, N. J. Kasdin, B. Macin- tosh, W. Moos, S. Perlmutter, M. Postman, B. Rauscher, J. Rhodes, Y. Wang, D. Weinberg, D. Benford, M. Hud- son, W. S. Jeong, Y. Mellier, W. Traub, T. Yamada, P. Capak, J. Colbert, D. M...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  28. [28]

    D. R. DeBoer, A. R. Parsons, J. E. Aguirre, P. Alexan- der, Z. S. Ali, A. P. Beardsley, G. Bernardi, J. D. Bow- man, R. F. Bradley, C. L. Carilli, C. Cheng, E. de Lera Acedo, J. S. Dillon, A. Ewall-Wice, G. Fadana, N. Fagnoni, R. Fritz, S. R. Furlanetto, B. Glenden- ning, B. Greig, J. Grobbelaar, B. J. Hazelton, J. N. He- witt, J. Hickish, D. C. Jacobs, A...

    work page arXiv 2017

  29. [29]

    Koopmans, J

    L. Koopmans, J. Pritchard, G. Mellema, J. Aguirre, K. Ahn, R. Barkana, I. van Bemmel, G. Bernardi, A. Bonaldi, F. Briggs, A. G. de Bruyn, T. C. Chang, E. Chapman, X. Chen, B. Ciardi, P. Dayal, A. Ferrara, A. Fialkov, F. Fiore, K. Ichiki, I. T. Illiev, S. Inoue, V. Jelic, M. Jones, J. Lazio, U. Maio, S. Majumdar, K. J. Mack, A. Mesinger, M. F. Morales, A. ...

    work page arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    L. Y. A. Yung, R. S. Somerville, T. Nguyen, P. Behroozi, C. Modi, and J. P. Gardner, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 8 530, 4868 (2024), arXiv:2309.14408 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    P. S. Behroozi, R. H. Wechsler, and H.-Y. Wu, Astrophys. J.762, 109 (2013), arXiv:1110.4372 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2013

  32. [32]

    Planck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Bacci- galupi, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, J. G. Bartlett, N. Bartolo, E. Battaner, R. Battye, K. Benabed, A. Benoˆ ıt, A. Benoit-L´ evy, J.-P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, A. Bonaldi, L. Bonavera, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boulanger...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    K. R. Stewart, J. S. Bullock, E. J. Barton, and R. H. Wechsler, Astrophys. J.702, 1005 (2009), arXiv:0811.1218 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2009

  34. [34]

    Wang, Y.-Y

    K. Wang, Y.-Y. Mao, A. R. Zentner, J. U. Lange, F. C. van den Bosch, and R. H. Wechsler, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.498, 4450 (2020), arXiv:2004.13732 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Diemer, Astrophys

    B. Diemer, Astrophys. J.909, 112 (2021), arXiv:2007.10992 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    S. D. Landy and A. S. Szalay, Astrophys. J.412, 64 (1993)

    1993

  37. [37]

    Sinha and L

    M. Sinha and L. Garrison, inSoftware Challenges to Ex- ascale Computing, edited by A. Majumdar and R. Arora (Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2019) pp. 3–20

    2019

  38. [38]

    Sinha and L

    M. Sinha and L. H. Garrison, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 491, 3022 (2020)

    2020

  39. [39]

    R. E. Smith, R. Scoccimarro, and R. K. Sheth, Phys. Rev. D75, 063512 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0609547 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2007

  40. [40]

    COLOSSUS: A python toolkit for cosmology, large-scale structure, and dark matter halos

    B. Diemer, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.239, 35 (2018), arXiv:1712.04512 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    J. S. Bagla and J. Prasad, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 370, 993 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0601320 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2006

  42. [42]

    Cole and N

    S. Cole and N. Kaiser, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.237, 1127 (1989)

    1989

  43. [43]

    McClintock, E

    T. McClintock, E. Rozo, A. Banerjee, M. R. Becker, J. DeRose, S. McLaughlin, J. L. Tinker, R. H. Wechsler, and Z. Zhai, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1907.13167 (2019), arXiv:1907.13167 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 1907

  44. [44]

    Dalmasso, G

    N. Dalmasso, G. Ferrami, N. Leethochawalit, E. M. Ven- tura, and M. Trenti, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.546, stag001 (2026), arXiv:2601.01697 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Harikane, Y

    Y. Harikane, Y. Ono, M. Ouchi, C. Liu, M. Sawicki, T. Shibuya, P. S. Behroozi, W. He, K. Shimasaku, S. Arnouts, J. Coupon, S. Fujimoto, S. Gwyn, J. Huang, A. K. Inoue, N. Kashikawa, Y. Komiyama, Y. Matsuoka, and C. J. Willott, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.259, 20 (2022), arXiv:2108.01090 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    J. B. Mu˜ noz, J. Mirocha, S. Furlanetto, and N. Sabti, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.526, L47 (2023), arXiv:2306.09403 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    L. Y. A. Yung, R. S. Somerville, and K. G. Iyer, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.543, 3802 (2025), arXiv:2504.18618 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Luki´ c, D

    Z. Luki´ c, D. Reed, S. Habib, and K. Heitmann, Astro- phys. J.692, 217 (2009), arXiv:0803.3624 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2009

  49. [49]

    Pizzati, J

    E. Pizzati, J. F. Hennawi, J. Schaye, and M. Schaller, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.528, 4466 (2024), arXiv:2311.17181 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Cosmic Dawn (CoDa): the First Radiation-Hydrodynamics Simulation of Reionization and Galaxy Formation in the Local Universe

    P. Ocvirk, N. Gillet, P. R. Shapiro, D. Aubert, I. T. Iliev, R. Teyssier, G. Yepes, J.-H. Choi, D. Sullivan, A. Knebe, S. Gottl¨ ober, A. D’Aloisio, H. Park, Y. Hoffman, and T. Stranex, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.463, 1462 (2016), arXiv:1511.00011 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  51. [51]

    H. Xu, J. H. Wise, M. L. Norman, K. Ahn, and B. W. O’Shea, Astrophys. J.833, 84 (2016), arXiv:1604.07842 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2016

  52. [52]

    Hern´ andez-Aguayo, V

    C. Hern´ andez-Aguayo, V. Springel, R. Pakmor, M. Bar- rera, F. Ferlito, S. D. M. White, L. Hernquist, B. Hadzhiyska, A. M. Delgado, R. Kannan, S. Bose, and C. Frenk, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.524, 2556 (2023), arXiv:2210.10059 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    D. J. Croton, L. Gao, and S. D. M. White, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.374, 1303 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0605636 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2007

  54. [54]

    Dalal, M

    N. Dalal, M. White, J. R. Bond, and A. Shirokov, Astro- phys. J.687, 12 (2008), arXiv:0803.3453 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2008

  55. [55]

    Precision measurement of the local bias of dark matter halos

    T. Lazeyras, C. Wagner, T. Baldauf, and F. Schmidt, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2016(2), 018, arXiv:1511.01096 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  56. [56]

    Paranjape and N

    A. Paranjape and N. Padmanabhan, Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc.468, 2984 (2017), arXiv:1612.02833 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    Mansfield and A

    P. Mansfield and A. V. Kravtsov, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.493, 4763 (2020), arXiv:1902.00030 [astro-ph.CO]. 9

    work page arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    C. Modi, E. Castorina, and U. Seljak, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.472, 3959 (2017), arXiv:1612.01621 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2017

  59. [59]

    Gil-Mar´ ın, C

    H. Gil-Mar´ ın, C. Wagner, L. Verde, R. Jimenez, and A. F. Heavens, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.407, 772 (2010), arXiv:1003.3238 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2010

  60. [60]

    Hoffmann, J

    K. Hoffmann, J. Bel, and E. Gazta˜ naga, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.465, 2225 (2017), arXiv:1607.01024 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2017

  61. [61]

    Schmittfull, M

    M. Schmittfull, M. Simonovi´ c, V. Assassi, and M. Zaldarriaga, Phys. Rev. D100, 043514 (2019), arXiv:1811.10640 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2019

  62. [62]

    E. Mons, V. Prasad Maranchery, M. S. S. Sivadas, and C. Jose, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.546, stag234 (2026), arXiv:2506.07662 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026

  63. [63]

    Manera, R

    M. Manera, R. K. Sheth, and R. Scoccimarro, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.402, 589 (2010), arXiv:0906.1314 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2010

  64. [64]

    K. K. Boone and D. J. Eisenstein, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2603.18234 (2026), arXiv:2603.18234 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026