arxiv: 2604.14340 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: unknown

One-Loop Quantum Corrections to the Casimir Effect for Rough Plates in the Low-Temperature Regime

Claudio B\'orquez , Byron Droguett

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords Casimir effectrough platesone-loop correctionsWKB approximationzeta-function regularizationlow temperaturetopological massscalar field

0 comments

The pith

Perturbative roughness on conducting plates produces calculable one-loop corrections to the Casimir energy at low temperatures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper computes one-loop quantum corrections to the effective potential of a self-interacting scalar field between two parallel conducting plates that have small geometric roughness. The authors apply the WKB method to obtain the spectral density of the modified Laplace-Beltrami operator and employ contour integration within a zeta-function regularization scheme to extract finite results. These steps produce explicit analytical expressions for corrections driven by the boundary roughness and by finite temperature in the low-temperature regime. The work also yields concrete contributions to the Casimir energy and a geometry-dependent topological mass term. A reader would care because real surfaces always have some roughness that could shift measurable vacuum forces at nanoscale separations.

Core claim

Using WKB methods to evaluate the spectral density of the modified Laplace-Beltrami operator, together with contour integration within a ζ-function regularization scheme, analytical expressions are derived for the quantum corrections to the effective potential induced by perturbative boundary roughness and finite temperature. Explicit contributions to the Casimir energy and to the topological mass generation associated with the geometry are computed.

What carries the argument

WKB approximation applied to the spectral density of the modified Laplace-Beltrami operator on the rough boundaries, regularized by contour integration in the zeta-function scheme.

If this is right

The Casimir energy acquires explicit perturbative corrections proportional to the roughness amplitude.
A topological mass for the scalar field is generated, depending on the plate geometry.
Temperature-dependent terms appear in the low-temperature expansion of the one-loop potential and modify the force between the plates.
The resulting effective potential supplies concrete predictions for force shifts in setups with controlled surface roughness.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The analytical formulas could be tested in high-precision Casimir-force experiments that vary surface roughness in a controlled way.
The same WKB-plus-zeta approach might be applied to non-parallel geometries or to other bosonic fields.
Geometry-induced mass generation could connect to effective descriptions of confined quantum fields in condensed-matter systems.

Load-bearing premise

The boundary roughness is small enough to be treated as a perturbation so that the WKB approximation accurately gives the spectral density of the operator.

What would settle it

Numerical evaluation of the one-loop effective potential for a chosen rough-plate profile at low temperature, followed by direct comparison with the derived analytical expressions.

read the original abstract

We present a theoretical analysis of the one-loop effective potential of a self-interacting real scalar field in the presence of two parallel conducting plates with geometric roughness. Using WKB methods to evaluate the spectral density of the modified Laplace-Beltrami operator, together with contour integration within a $\zeta$-function regularization scheme, we derive analytical expressions for the quantum corrections to the effective potential induced by perturbative boundary roughness and finite temperature. Furthermore, we compute explicit contributions to the Casimir energy and to the topological mass generation associated with the geometry.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper derives explicit one-loop corrections to the Casimir energy and topological mass for perturbatively rough plates at low T using WKB plus zeta regularization for a scalar field, but the WKB step for the full spectral density lacks clear error control.

read the letter

The core result is a set of analytical expressions for how small boundary roughness modifies the one-loop effective potential, Casimir energy, and a geometry-induced mass term for a real scalar field between parallel plates in the low-temperature limit. They start from the modified Laplace-Beltrami operator, apply WKB to extract its spectral density, and then use contour integration inside zeta-function regularization to pull out the finite-temperature and roughness corrections in closed form. That is the actual new piece: concrete formulas rather than just a numerical scan or a formal setup. If the algebra holds, it gives a practical tool for estimating roughness effects without having to solve the full eigenvalue problem exactly. The work stays within standard techniques and applies them cleanly to this geometry, which is a modest but honest step for people who already work on Casimir setups with imperfect boundaries. The derivations appear internally consistent on the terms they keep, and they correctly reduce to the flat-plate case when the roughness amplitude goes to zero. The main soft spot is the WKB approximation itself. WKB is an asymptotic high-momentum tool, yet the zeta-regularized quantities integrate over the entire spectrum, including infrared modes that feel the boundary perturbation most directly. The paper supplies no explicit error bound, no comparison to exact solvable cases, and no stated regime where the roughness scale stays safely larger than the relevant wavelengths at low T. That leaves the final expressions with an uncontrolled uncertainty when the roughness is not tiny compared with the thermal length. The calculation is also restricted to a scalar field and the low-T regime, so it does not yet address photons or higher temperatures. This is specialized work for readers already inside Casimir physics and QFT in bounded geometries. Someone who needs analytical expressions for perturbative roughness corrections will find usable formulas here; a general reader or someone outside the subfield will not. The paper is coherent enough on its own terms to deserve a serious referee who can check the WKB justification and ask for validation against limits. I would send it to peer review rather than desk-reject it.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the one-loop effective potential of a self-interacting real scalar field between two parallel conducting plates with perturbative geometric roughness. Using WKB methods to evaluate the spectral density of the modified Laplace-Beltrami operator combined with contour integration in a ζ-function regularization scheme, it derives analytical expressions for quantum corrections to the effective potential from boundary roughness and finite temperature, and computes explicit contributions to the Casimir energy and topological mass generation in the low-temperature regime.

Significance. If the central derivations are valid, the work supplies analytical expressions for finite-temperature Casimir corrections induced by small boundary roughness, extending standard zeta-regularization techniques to rough geometries. This could be relevant for theoretical studies of vacuum fluctuations in non-ideal boundaries. The approach follows established methods in the field but provides no machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or parameter-free derivations to strengthen the result.

major comments (1)

The central claim depends on the accuracy of the WKB approximation for the full spectral density of the modified Laplace-Beltrami operator under perturbative roughness. WKB is a high-momentum asymptotic method, yet the ζ-regularized one-loop quantities receive contributions from the entire spectrum, including infrared modes sensitive to boundary perturbations at low temperature. No explicit error estimate, regime of validity, or comparison to exact results for the spectral density is provided, leaving the derived expressions for Casimir energy and topological mass with potentially uncontrolled errors. This issue is load-bearing for all quantitative claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We have carefully considered the concern regarding the WKB approximation and provide a point-by-point response below. We believe the approach is justified within the perturbative regime but agree that additional clarification on its validity is warranted.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central claim depends on the accuracy of the WKB approximation for the full spectral density of the modified Laplace-Beltrami operator under perturbative roughness. WKB is a high-momentum asymptotic method, yet the zeta-regularized one-loop quantities receive contributions from the entire spectrum, including infrared modes sensitive to boundary perturbations at low temperature. No explicit error estimate, regime of validity, or comparison to exact results for the spectral density is provided, leaving the derived expressions for Casimir energy and topological mass with potentially uncontrolled errors. This issue is load-bearing for all quantitative claims.

Authors: We agree that WKB provides an asymptotic approximation for high momenta and that the zeta function involves the full spectrum. In our work, the roughness is treated perturbatively to first order, and the WKB is applied to the leading correction term in the spectral density. The infrared contributions are regularized consistently with the flat case subtraction, which removes the dominant low-momentum sensitivities. We will revise the manuscript to include an explicit discussion of the regime of validity, namely when the roughness amplitude is small compared to the plate separation and the characteristic wavelengths, ensuring that the perturbative WKB correction remains accurate. While we cannot provide a direct comparison to exact results (as none are available for arbitrary roughness), we will add numerical validation for specific cases to support the approximation. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved

Direct comparison to exact spectral density results for rough geometries, since such exact analytical expressions are not known and would require solving the eigenvalue problem for the Laplace-Beltrami operator with arbitrary boundary perturbations, which is beyond the scope of this perturbative analysis.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard WKB + zeta regularization applied to geometry-defined operator

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by defining a modified Laplace-Beltrami operator from the perturbative boundary roughness, approximating its spectral density via WKB, and extracting the one-loop effective potential through contour integration inside a zeta-function scheme. None of the load-bearing steps reduce the final analytical expressions for Casimir energy or topological mass to the inputs by construction; the outputs are obtained by applying established regularization techniques to an operator whose form is fixed by the given geometry. No self-citations are invoked to justify uniqueness or to smuggle ansatze, and no fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions. The chain remains independent of the target results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum field theory techniques applied to a boundary-modified operator; the perturbative treatment of roughness and validity of WKB for the spectral density are key unproven assumptions for this geometry.

free parameters (1)

roughness amplitude
Perturbative parameter controlling the size of geometric deviations from flat plates; required for the expansion of the boundary conditions.

axioms (2)

domain assumption WKB approximation accurately evaluates the spectral density of the modified Laplace-Beltrami operator for small roughness
Invoked to obtain analytical expressions for the one-loop effective potential.
standard math Zeta-function regularization via contour integration is applicable to the finite-temperature corrections
Used to regularize the mode sums in the presence of temperature and roughness.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5383 in / 1319 out tokens · 50032 ms · 2026-05-10T12:17:44.856526+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

[1]

H. B. G. Casimir,On the Attraction Between Two Perfectly Conducting Plates, Indag. Math.10, 261-263 (1948)

1948
[2]

S. K. Lamoreaux,Demonstration of the Casimir force in the 0.6 to 6 microm- eters range, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 5-8 (1997) [erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 5475-5476 (1998)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.5

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.5 1997
[3]

Bressi, G

G. Bressi, G. Carugno, R. Onofrio and G. Ruoso,Measurement of the Casimir force between parallel metallic surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 041804 (2002) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.041804 [arXiv:quant-ph/0203002 [quant-ph]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.041804 2002
[4]

Buryak, P.D

M. Bordag, U. Mohideen and V. M. Mostepanenko,New developments in the Casimir effect, Phys. Rept.353, 1-205 (2001) doi:10.1016/S0370- 1573(01)00015-1 [arXiv:quant-ph/0106045 [quant-ph]]

work page doi:10.1016/s0370- 2001
[5]

L. P. Teo,Casimir interaction between a cylinder and a plate at finite temper- ature: Exact results and comparison to proximity force approximation, Phys. Rev. D84, 025022 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.025022 [arXiv:1106.1251 [quant-ph]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.025022 2011
[6]

Y. Zhao, C. G. Shao and J. Luo,Finite temperature Casimir effect for corrugated plates, Chin. Phys. Lett.23, 2928-2931 (2006) doi:10.1088/0256- 307X/23/11/013

work page doi:10.1088/0256- 2006
[7]

C. G. Beneventano and E. M. Santangelo,Finite temperature properties of the Dirac operator under local boundary conditions, J. Phys. A37, 9261-9274 (2004) doi:10.1088/0305-4470/37/39/013 [arXiv:hep-th/0404115 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/37/39/013 2004
[8]

Vacuum energy, temperature corrections and heat kernel coefficients in (D+1)-dimensional spacetimes with nontrivial topology,

H. Mota, “Vacuum energy, temperature corrections and heat kernel coefficients in (D+1)-dimensional spacetimes with nontrivial topology,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D33(2024) no.12, 2450046 doi:10.1142/S0218271824500469 [arXiv:2312.01909 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1142/s0218271824500469 2024
[9]

Bellucci, I

S. Bellucci, I. Brevik, A. A. Saharian and H. G. Sargsyan,The Casimir effect for fermionic currents in conical rings with applications to graphene ribbons, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 281 (2020) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7819-8 [arXiv:1912.09143 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7819-8 2020
[10]

C. G. Beneventano and E. M. Santangelo,Finite-temperature relativistic Lan- dau problem and the relativistic quantum Hall effect, J. Phys. A39, 7457-7470 (2006) doi:10.1088/0305-4470/39/23/019 [arXiv:hep-th/0511166 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/39/23/019 2006
[11]

Erdas and K

A. Erdas and K. P. Seltzer,Finite temperature Casimir effect for charged massless scalars in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D88, 105007 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.105007 [arXiv:1304.6417 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.105007 2013
[12]

Erdas,Magnetic field corrections to the repulsive Casimir effect at finite temperature, Int

A. Erdas,Magnetic field corrections to the repulsive Casimir effect at finite temperature, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A31(2016) no.07, 07 doi:10.1142/S0217751X16500184 [arXiv:1511.05940 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x16500184 2016
[13]

Casimir effect of rough plates under a mag- netic field in Hoˇ rava-Lifshitz theory,

B. Droguett and C. B´ orquez, “Casimir effect of rough plates under a mag- netic field in Hoˇ rava-Lifshitz theory,” Nucl. Phys. B1014(2025), 116878 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.116878 [arXiv:2501.05597 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.116878 2025
[14]

Quantum Vacuum Energy in a Closed Universe,

L. H. Ford, “Quantum Vacuum Energy in a Closed Universe,” Phys. Rev. D 14(1976), 3304-3313 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.14.3304

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.14.3304 1976
[15]

Casimir effect of two conducting parallel plates in a gen- eral weak gravitational field,

B. Nazari, “Casimir effect of two conducting parallel plates in a gen- eral weak gravitational field,” Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) no.10, 501 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3732-y [arXiv:1508.02150 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3732-y 2015
[16]

Casimir effect in the Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz gravity with a cosmological constant,

C. R. Muniz, V. B. Bezerra and M. S. Cunha, “Casimir effect in the Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz gravity with a cosmological constant,” Annals Phys.359 (2015), 55-63 doi:10.1016/j.aop.2015.04.014 [arXiv:1405.5424 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2015.04.014 2015
[17]

B´ orquez and B

C. B´ orquez and B. Droguett,Casimir effect in 2+1 Hoˇ rava gravity, Phys. Lett. B844(2023), 138096 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138096 [arXiv:2301.04566 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138096 2023
[18]

T. H. Boyer,Quantum electromagnetic zero point energy of a conducting spher- ical shell and the Casimir model for a charged particle, Phys. Rev.174, 1764- 1774 (1968) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.174.1764

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.174.1764 1968
[19]

Normal and Lat- eral Casimir Forces between Deformed Plates,

T. Emig, A. Hanke, R. Golestanian and M. Kardar, “Normal and Lat- eral Casimir Forces between Deformed Plates,” Phys. Rev. A67, no.2, 022114 (2003) doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.67.022114 [arXiv:cond-mat/0211193 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.67.022114 2003
[20]

M. B. Cruz, E. R. Bezerra de Mello and A. Y. Petrov,Casimir effects in Lorentz-violating scalar field theory, Phys. Rev. D96, no.4, 045019 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.045019 [arXiv:1705.03331 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.045019 2017
[21]

E. R. B. de Mello and M. B. Cruz,Scalar Casimir effects in a Lorentz violation scenario induced by the presence of constant vectors, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 38(2023) no.11, 2350062 doi:10.1142/S0217751X23500628 [arXiv:2210.09243 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x23500628 2023
[22]

Erdas,Casimir effect of a Lorentz-violating scalar in magnetic field, Int

A. Erdas,Casimir effect of a Lorentz-violating scalar in magnetic field, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35, no.31, 2050209 (2020) doi:10.1142/S0217751X20502097 [arXiv:2005.07830 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x20502097 2020
[23]

M. B. Cruz, E. R. Bezerra De Mello and A. Y. Petrov,Thermal corrections to the Casimir energy in a Lorentz-breaking scalar field theory, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 33, no.20, 1850115 (2018) doi:10.1142/S0217732318501158 [arXiv:1803.07446 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1142/s0217732318501158 2018
[24]

Erdas,Thermal effects on the Casimir energy of a Lorentz-violating scalar in magnetic field, Int

A. Erdas,Thermal effects on the Casimir energy of a Lorentz-violating scalar in magnetic field, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A36, no.20, 20 (2021) doi:10.1142/S0217751X21501554 [arXiv:2103.12823 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x21501554 2021
[25]

Droguett and C

B. Droguett and C. B´ orquez,Casimir effect of a rough membrane in an aether- like Lorentz-violating scenario, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39, no.24, 2450098 (2024) doi:10.1142/S0217751X24500982 [arXiv:2404.13187 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x24500982 2024
[26]

Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point

P. Hoˇ rava,Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point, Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 084008 [arXiv:0901.3775 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2009
[27]

Anselmi,Weighted power counting and Lorentz violating gauge theories

D. Anselmi,Weighted power counting and Lorentz violating gauge theories. I. General properties, Annals Phys.324(2009), 874-896 doi:10.1016/j.aop.2008.12.005 [arXiv:0808.3470 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2008.12.005 2009
[28]

A. F. Ferrari, H. O. Girotti, M. Gomes, A. Y. Petrov and A. J. da Silva, Hoˇ rava-Lifshitz modifications of the Casimir effect, Mod. Phys. Lett. A28, 1350052 (2013) doi:10.1142/S0217732313500521 [arXiv:1006.1635 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1142/s0217732313500521 2013
[29]

I. J. Morales Ulion, E. R. Bezerra de Mello and A. Y. Petrov,Casimir effect in Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz-like theories, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A30, no.36, 1550220 (2015) doi:10.1142/S0217751X15502206 [arXiv:1511.00489 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x15502206 2015
[30]

D. R. da Silva, M. B. Cruz and E. R. Bezerra de Mello,Fermionic Casimir effect in Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz theories, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A34, no.20, 1950107 (2019) doi:10.1142/S0217751X19501070 [arXiv:1905.01295 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x19501070 2019
[31]

Erdas,Magnetic corrections to the fermionic Casimir effect in Horava- Lifshitz theories, Int

A. Erdas,Magnetic corrections to the fermionic Casimir effect in Horava- Lifshitz theories, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A38, no.22n23, 2350117 (2023) doi:10.1142/S0217751X23501178 [arXiv:2307.06228 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x23501178 2023
[32]

Cheng,The Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz modifications of the Casimir effect at finite temperature revisited, Eur

H. Cheng,The Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz modifications of the Casimir effect at finite temperature revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C82, no.11, 1032 (2022) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10854-4 [arXiv:2209.14544 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10854-4 2022
[33]

B´ orquez and B

C. B´ orquez and B. Droguett,Casimir effect of a rough membrane in 2 + 1 Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz theory, Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) no.1, 62 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12420-6 [arXiv:2312.01997 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12420-6 2024
[34]

Kirsten and P

K. Kirsten and P. Loya,Computation of determinants using contour integrals, Am. J. Phys.76, 60-64 (2008) doi:10.1119/1.2794348 [arXiv:0707.3755 [hep- th]]

work page doi:10.1119/1.2794348 2008
[35]

Kirsten,Basic zeta functions and some applications in physics,MSRI Publ.57(2010) 101–143, [1005.2389]

K. Kirsten,Basic zeta functions and some applications in physics, MSRI Publ. 57, 101-143 (2010) [arXiv:1005.2389 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2010
[36]

Casimir effect, loop corrections, and topological mass generation for interacting real and complex scalar fields in Minkowski spacetime with different conditions,

A. J. D. F. Junior and H. F. Santana Mota, “Casimir effect, loop corrections, and topological mass generation for interacting real and complex scalar fields in Minkowski spacetime with different conditions,” Phys. Rev. D107(2023) no.12, 125019 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.125019 [arXiv:2302.14540 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.125019 2023
[37]

Loop correction to the scalar Casimir energy density and generation of topological mass due to a helix boundary condition in a scenario with Lorentz violation,

A. J. D. Farias, Junior and H. F. Mota Santana, “Loop correction to the scalar Casimir energy density and generation of topological mass due to a helix boundary condition in a scenario with Lorentz violation,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D31(2022) no.16, 2250126 doi:10.1142/S0218271822501267 [arXiv:2204.09400 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1142/s0218271822501267 2022
[38]

Ground state energy and topological mass in spacetimes with nontrivial topology,

P. J. Porf´ ırio, H. F. Santana Mota and G. Q. Garcia, “Ground state energy and topological mass in spacetimes with nontrivial topology,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 30(2021) no.08, 2150056 doi:10.1142/S0218271821500565 [arXiv:1908.00511 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1142/s0218271821500565 2021
[39]

Symmetry Breaking and Mass Generation by Space-time Topol- ogy,

D. J. Toms, “Symmetry Breaking and Mass Generation by Space-time Topol- ogy,” Phys. Rev. D21(1980), 2805 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2805

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.21.2805 1980
[40]

Vasak, M

D. J. Toms, “Interacting Twisted and Untwisted Scalar Fields in a Nonsim- ply Connected Space-time,” Annals Phys.129(1980), 334 doi:10.1016/0003- 4916(80)90392-9

work page doi:10.1016/0003- 1980
[41]

Vacuum energy and topological mass from a constant magnetic field and boundary condi- tions in coupled scalar field theories,

A. J. D. F. Junior, A. Erdas and H. F. Santana Mota, “Vacuum energy and topological mass from a constant magnetic field and boundary condi- tions in coupled scalar field theories,” Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no.12, 125026 doi:10.1103/qpkb-4rkl [arXiv:2508.15121 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1103/qpkb-4rkl 2025
[42]

One-Loop correction to the Casimir energy in Lorentz- violatingϕ4 theory with rough membrane boundaries,

M. A. Valuyan, “One-Loop correction to the Casimir energy in Lorentz- violatingϕ4 theory with rough membrane boundaries,” Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.22(2025) no.11, 2550084 doi:10.1142/S0219887825500847 [arXiv:2501.13413 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1142/s0219887825500847 2025
[43]

Vac- uum energy density from a self-interacting scalar field in a Lorentz- violation Hoˇ rava-Lifshitz model,

A. J. D. Farias Junior., E. R. B. de Mello and H. Mota, “Vac- uum energy density from a self-interacting scalar field in a Lorentz- violation Hoˇ rava-Lifshitz model,” Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.10, 105024 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.105024 [arXiv:2410.07999 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.105024 2025
[44]

Vacuum energy density for interacting real and complex scalar fields in a Lorentz symmetry violation scenario,

A. J. D. F. Junior, A. Smirnov, H. F. Santana Mota and E. R. B. de Mello, “Vacuum energy density for interacting real and complex scalar fields in a Lorentz symmetry violation scenario,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D34(2025) no.01, 2450069 doi:10.1142/S021827182450069X [arXiv:2405.14656 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1142/s021827182450069x 2025
[45]

Jackiw, Phys

R. Jackiw, “Functional evaluation of the effective potential,” Phys. Rev. D9 (1974), 1686 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.1686

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.9.1686 1974
[46]

Buchbinder, S.D

L. Buchbinder, S.D. Odintsov and I.L. Shapiro,Effective action in quantum gravity, CRC Press (1992)

1992
[47]

(2015) Hamiltonian formalism and path entropy maximization.J

T. D. Jeffres, K. Kirsten and T. Lu, “Zeta Function on Surfaces of Revolu- tion,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.45, no.34, 345201 (2012) doi:10.1088/1751- 8113/45/34/345201 [arXiv:1211.4043 [math-ph]]

work page doi:10.1088/1751- 2012