pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14368 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 🧮 math.OC

A Noise Tolerant SQP Algorithm for Inequality Constrained Optimization

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC
keywords sequential quadratic programmingbounded noiseinequality constrained optimizationglobal convergenceline search methodsquasi-Newton updatesnoise tolerant algorithms
0
0 comments X

The pith

A line search SQP algorithm for inequality constrained optimization remains globally convergent under bounded noise in all evaluations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a sequential quadratic programming algorithm that incorporates relaxations to manage noise in the objective function, constraints, and their derivatives. The analysis shows that the method preserves global convergence properties even when these evaluations are inexact within a known bound. Implementation with modified quasi-Newton updates allows the solution accuracy to scale with the noise level. This matters because many practical optimization problems rely on noisy simulations or measurements rather than exact computations. The result provides a reliable way to solve such problems without assuming perfect data.

Core claim

The paper proposes a noise-tolerant SQP algorithm for inequality constrained optimization problems. It is a line search method that uses relaxations to handle potential inconsistency in the quadratic subproblems due to noise. The theory establishes global convergence to a stationary point, and the achieved accuracy is proportional to the noise level and problem parameters. Numerical experiments with noise-aware quasi-Newton updates support the theoretical predictions.

What carries the argument

Line search sequential quadratic programming with relaxations for handling noisy and inconsistent subproblems, paired with noise-aware quasi-Newton Hessian approximations.

Load-bearing premise

All evaluations of the objective, constraints, and derivatives contain noise bounded by a known constant, and the relaxations do not invalidate the convergence theory of the underlying SQP method.

What would settle it

Observe whether the algorithm fails to converge or exceeds the predicted accuracy when noise in some evaluations surpasses the assumed bound on a test problem.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14368 by Figen Oztoprak, Richard Byrd.

Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: The dependence of v(xf ) (upper subplot) and |f(xf )−f(x∗)| (lower subplot) to the noise level, where xf is the iterate returned by the algorithm. The plots are generated at the logarithmic scale for clarity; the labels display the true (unscaled) values. We next run the algorithm by injecting noise to function and gradient evaluations. We added uniformly distributed random noise to each function evaluat… view at source ↗
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: The final value of the penalty parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_4_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.3
Figure 4.3. Figure 4.3: The iterate the algorithm finds for the first time a solution with an objective [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_4_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a sequential quadratic programming (SQP) algorithm for inequality constrained optimization that is robust to the presence of bounded noise in function and derivative evaluations. We cover the case where constraint evaluations contain noise as well as the objective. The proposed algorithm is a line search SQP method with relaxations to deal with noise. We study the effect of noise on the global convergence behavior of the algorithm. We implement the algorithm with noise-aware quasi-Newton updates, and numerically observe that the algorithm can achieve accuracy proportional to the noise level and problem-dependent parameters, as suggested by the theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a line-search SQP algorithm for inequality-constrained optimization that incorporates explicit relaxations to accommodate bounded noise in objective, constraint, and derivative evaluations. It analyzes the global convergence of the method to a neighborhood whose radius scales with the noise bound and problem-dependent constants, implements the approach using noise-aware quasi-Newton updates, and reports numerical experiments in which observed accuracy is proportional to the noise level as predicted by the theory.

Significance. If the convergence result holds, the work provides a theoretically grounded extension of SQP to noisy settings that arise in simulation-based or experimental optimization. The explicit proportionality between solution accuracy and noise level, together with the numerical confirmation of this scaling, is a concrete strength that distinguishes the contribution from purely heuristic robustification approaches.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract asserts global convergence and noise-proportional accuracy but does not state the precise noise model or give a one-sentence sketch of the key relaxation mechanism; adding these would improve readability without lengthening the abstract appreciably.
  2. The numerical section would benefit from an explicit description of the test problems, the precise error metrics used to measure accuracy, and how the bounded noise was generated in the experiments, to allow independent verification of the observed scaling.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript, accurate summary of the noise-tolerant SQP method with relaxations, and recommendation for minor revision. The referee correctly identifies the global convergence to a noise-dependent neighborhood and the observed proportionality in numerical results as key strengths.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central result—that a line-search SQP method with explicit relaxations for bounded noise in function/derivative/constraint evaluations retains global convergence to a neighborhood whose radius scales with the noise bound—is derived from standard SQP convergence analysis once the noise is assumed bounded and known. No equations, fitted parameters, or predictions are shown to reduce by construction to the inputs; the accuracy proportionality is an output of the analysis rather than a definitional renaming or self-citation chain. The provided abstract and context contain no load-bearing self-citations, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or uniqueness theorems imported from the authors themselves. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that all noise is bounded by a fixed constant and on standard SQP regularity conditions (constraint qualification, boundedness of iterates) that are not detailed in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption All function, constraint, and derivative evaluations contain additive noise bounded by a known constant.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the setting the algorithm is designed to handle.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5384 in / 1205 out tokens · 25809 ms · 2026-05-10T12:14:26.050405+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

20 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Derivative-free optimization of noisy functions via quasi-Newton methods.SIAM Journal on Optimization, 29(2):965– 993, 2019

    Albert S Berahas, Richard H Byrd, and Jorge Nocedal. Derivative-free optimization of noisy functions via quasi-Newton methods.SIAM Journal on Optimization, 29(2):965– 993, 2019

  2. [2]

    Frank Vanden Berghen and Hugues Bersini. Condor, a new parallel, constrained exten- sion of powell’s uobyqa algorithm: Experimental results and comparison with the dfo algorithm.Journal of computational and applied mathematics, 181(1):157–175, 2005. 28

  3. [3]

    A robust sequential quadratic programming method.Mathematical Programming, 43(1):277–303, 1989

    James V Burke and Shih-Ping Han. A robust sequential quadratic programming method.Mathematical Programming, 43(1):277–303, 1989

  4. [4]

    An algo- rithm for nonlinear optimization using linear programming and equality constrained subproblems.Mathematical Programming, 100(1):27–48, 2003

    Richard H Byrd, Nicholas IM Gould, Jorge Nocedal, and Richard A Waltz. An algo- rithm for nonlinear optimization using linear programming and equality constrained subproblems.Mathematical Programming, 100(1):27–48, 2003

  5. [5]

    A line search exact penalty method using steering rules.Mathematical Programming, 133(1-2):39–73, 2012

    Richard H Byrd, Gabriel Lopez-Calva, and Jorge Nocedal. A line search exact penalty method using steering rules.Mathematical Programming, 133(1-2):39–73, 2012

  6. [6]

    An interior-point algorithm for continuous nonlinearly constrained optimization with noisy function and derivative evaluations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11302, 2025

    Frank E Curtis, Shima Dezfulian, and Andreas Waechter. An interior-point algorithm for continuous nonlinearly constrained optimization with noisy function and derivative evaluations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11302, 2025

  7. [7]

    An interior-point algorithm for large-scale nonlinear optimization with inexact step computations.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 32(6):3447–3475, 2010

    Frank E Curtis, Olaf Schenk, and Andreas W¨ achter. An interior-point algorithm for large-scale nonlinear optimization with inexact step computations.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 32(6):3447–3475, 2010

  8. [8]

    Stochastic approximation for expectation objective and expectation inequality-constrained nonconvex optimization, 2023

    Francisco Facchinei and Vyacheslav Kungurtsev. Stochastic approximation for expec- tation objective and expectation inequality-constrained nonconvex optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02943, 2023

  9. [9]

    On the stability of general convex programs under slater’s condition and primal solution boundedness.Optimization, 32(4):291–299, 1995

    Anthony V Fiacco and Jiming Liu. On the stability of general convex programs under slater’s condition and primal solution boundedness.Optimization, 32(4):291–299, 1995

  10. [10]

    A necessary and sufficient regularity condition to have bounded mul- tipliers in nonconvex programming.Mathematical Programming, 12(1):136–138, 1977

    Jacques Gauvin. A necessary and sufficient regularity condition to have bounded mul- tipliers in nonconvex programming.Mathematical Programming, 12(1):136–138, 1977

  11. [11]

    Convergence of successive linear programming algorithms for noisy functions.Computational Optimization and Applications, 88(2):567–601, 2024

    Christoph Hansknecht, Christian Kirches, and Paul Manns. Convergence of successive linear programming algorithms for noisy functions.Computational Optimization and Applications, 88(2):567–601, 2024

  12. [12]

    Solving nonlinear programming problems with noisy function values and noisy gradients.Journal of optimization theory and applications, 114(1):133–169, 2002

    M Hinterm¨ uller. Solving nonlinear programming problems with noisy function values and noisy gradients.Journal of optimization theory and applications, 114(1):133–169, 2002

  13. [13]

    Design guidelines for noise-tolerant optimization with applications in robust design.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.15007, 2024

    Yuchen Lou, Shigeng Sun, and Jorge Nocedal. Design guidelines for noise-tolerant optimization with applications in robust design.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.15007, 2024

  14. [14]

    Springer, 1999

    Jorge Nocedal and Stephen J Wright.Numerical optimization. Springer, 1999

  15. [15]

    Constrained optimization in the presence of noise.SIAM Journal on Optimization, 33(3):2118–2136, 2023

    Figen Oztoprak, Richard Byrd, and Jorge Nocedal. Constrained optimization in the presence of noise.SIAM Journal on Optimization, 33(3):2118–2136, 2023

  16. [16]

    Nonlinear programming methods in the presence of noise.Mathematical programming, 14:87–97, 1978

    BT Poljak. Nonlinear programming methods in the presence of noise.Mathematical programming, 14:87–97, 1978. 29

  17. [17]

    A robust implementation of a sequential quadratic programming algorithm with successive error restoration.Optimization Letters, 5:283–296, 2011

    Klaus Schittkowski. A robust implementation of a sequential quadratic programming algorithm with successive error restoration.Optimization Letters, 5:283–296, 2011

  18. [18]

    A noise-tolerant quasi- newton algorithm for unconstrained optimization.SIAM Journal on Optimization, 32(1):29–55, 2022

    Hao-Jun M Shi, Yuchen Xie, Richard Byrd, and Jorge Nocedal. A noise-tolerant quasi- newton algorithm for unconstrained optimization.SIAM Journal on Optimization, 32(1):29–55, 2022

  19. [19]

    A trust region method for noisy unconstrained opti- mization.Mathematical Programming, 202(1):445–472, 2023

    Shigeng Sun and Jorge Nocedal. A trust region method for noisy unconstrained opti- mization.Mathematical Programming, 202(1):445–472, 2023

  20. [20]

    A trust-region algorithm for noisy equality constrained optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.02665, 2024

    Shigeng Sun and Jorge Nocedal. A trust-region algorithm for noisy equality constrained optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.02665, 2024. 30