pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14502 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: unknown

The Last Galactic Firework: Timing the last significant merger with stars, globular clusters and ωCentauri

Chervin F. P. Laporte , Matthew D. A. Orkney
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 11:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords Milky Waygalactic mergerGaia-Sausage-Enceladusglobular clustersomega Centauristarburstdisk formationgalaxy assembly
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Milky Way's last significant merger occurred about 11 billion years ago, dated using subgiant star ages and globular cluster formation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a method to date the last major merger in the Milky Way by correlating the ages of subgiant stars with the formation of in-situ globular clusters. This application shows the Gaia-Sausage-Enceladus merger took place around 11 Gyr ago. The timing aligns with a starburst that formed a group of globular clusters at 11.2 plus or minus 0.1 Gyr, providing the most precise date for the event. It also suggests omega Centauri is the remnant of the merged galaxy and that the Milky Way disk began forming over 13 Gyr ago.

Core claim

The authors present a robust empirical method to infer the timing of the last significant merger in the Milky Way which is tested against fully cosmological models of galaxy formation. Applied to Milky Way subgiant stars with spectro-photometric ages, it finds that the last significant merger (Gaia-Sausage-Enceladus, GSE) occurred approximately 11 Gyr ago. This coincides with the birth of a coeval in-situ group of globular clusters, which constrains the merger-induced starburst to 11.2 plus or minus 0.1 Gyr. The GSE's most metal-rich GCs were born around this time and omega Centauri is argued to be the surviving remnant with matching ages and metallicities.

What carries the argument

An empirical timing method that correlates the ages of subgiant stars and the formation epoch of a coeval in-situ group of globular clusters to date the merger-induced starburst.

If this is right

  • The GSE merger occurred approximately 11 Gyr ago.
  • The merger-induced starburst is dated to 11.2 plus or minus 0.1 Gyr.
  • Omega Centauri is the surviving remnant of the GSE based on consistent ages, metallicities and orbital evidence.
  • Stellar orbits show a transition from halo-like to disk-like kinematics at a mean metallicity of about -1.33.
  • Proto-MW globular clusters with disk-like orbits formed up to 13.0 plus or minus 0.5 Gyr ago, placing disk formation at redshift greater than or equal to 4.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This timing anchor could help calibrate cosmological simulations to reproduce the Milky Way's specific merger sequence.
  • The method may extend to other galaxies once sufficient spectro-photometric age data on subgiant stars and globular clusters become available.
  • Detailed chemical and kinematic mapping of omega Centauri could test whether its internal populations carry direct signatures of the merger interaction.
  • Early disk formation would imply that subsequent minor mergers occurred while a disk was already in place.

Load-bearing premise

The spectro-photometric ages of subgiant stars and globular clusters can be directly mapped to the timing of the GSE merger without significant systematic biases in age determination or cluster association.

What would settle it

A measurement of subgiant star or globular cluster ages that clusters around a value clearly different from 11 Gyr, or orbital and chemical data showing omega Centauri is unrelated to the GSE.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14502 by Chervin F. P. Laporte, Matthew D. A. Orkney.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left panel: Age–metallicity relation for the VandenBerg et al. (2013) GCs. Large hexagons and stars correspond to MW-branch GCs while pentagons highlight the most metal-rich GCs associated with the GSE. White pentagons represent other GSE-related candidate GCs identified in the vicinity of the GSE debris of (Belokurov et al. 2020). Other inner-MW GCs with 𝐸 ≤ −1.5 × 105 km2 s 2 are highlighted as large fil… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Circularity versus metallicity diagram for stars and GCs in the MW. The solid black line marks the median curve for the stars. As expected, the curve flattens to 𝜂 ∼ 0 at the metal-poor end (−2.5 < [Fe/H] < −1.5), consistent with a velocity dispersion dominated system. Around [Fe/H] ∼ −1.4 we notice a sharp inflection point where the curve abruptly rises and reaches 𝜂 = 0.5 at a metallicity of [Fe/H]spinup… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Age–metallicity relations for the MW. Left panel: Age–metallicity relation for a sample of stars (background hexabinned data) and GCs (symbols similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top panel: [Mg/Fe] versus [Fe/H] abundance diagram for APOGEE stars with energies 𝐸 < −1.5 ⋅ 105 km2 s −2 and individual clus￾ter abundances for NGC 6121, NGC 6838 and NGC 304 in red, orange and yellow respectively. Bottom panel: [Al/Fe] versus [Fe/H] abundance dia￾gram for APOGEE stars with energies 𝐸 < −1.5 ⋅ 105 km2 s −2 and individual cluster abundances for NGC 6121, NGC 6838 and NGC 304. All three clu… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: 𝐸 − 𝐿z plane some with density contours for the GSE where it is most prominently identified in the Gaia data (Belokurov et al. 2023) and location of 𝜔Cen (star). Top panel: Logarithmic star counts. Bottom panel: Same plane colour coded by metallicity [M/H]. The core of the GSE is more metal-rich than its surrounding by ≈ 0.25 dex. A diagonal metal-poor ridge connecting back to the GSE debris centroid bound… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a robust method to empirically infer the timing of the last significant merger in the Milky Way which is tested against fully cosmological models of galaxy formation. We apply it to Milky Way subgiant stars with spectro-photometric ages, finding that the last significant merger (Gaia-Sausage-Enceladus, GSE), occurred $\sim11\,$Gyrs ago. This coincides with the birth of a coeval in-situ group of globular clusters (GCs), which constrains the merger-induced starburst (hereafter {\it Tain\'{a}}) to have occurred at $11.2\pm 0.1\,\rm{Gyr}$, the most precise dating of this merger event. The GSE's most metal-rich GCs were also born around this time ($\tau=10.9\pm0.1\,\rm{Gyr}$) and likely formed during the merger interaction prior to disruption of the GSE. We argue that $\omega$ Centauri is the most likely candidate for the surviving remnant of the GSE, and show that its stellar populations have final ages and metallicities consistent with the GSE GCs together with observational evidence it may have been affected by bar resonances. Furthermore, we argue that the mean metallicity for which stellar orbits transition from halo-like to disc-like kinematics shows an upward inflexion point at $[\rm{Fe/H}]\sim-1.33$, and this sets an upper-limit for the age when the disc was forming. To corroborate this, we identify proto-MW GCs with highly disc-like orbits that formed before the last significant merger (with ages up to $\tau=13.0\pm0.5\,\rm{Gyr}$). This places the disc formation time as far back as as $z_{\rm disc\, form}\gtrsim4$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a method to empirically time the last significant merger in the Milky Way, validated on cosmological simulations. Applied to subgiant stars with spectro-photometric ages, it finds the Gaia-Sausage-Enceladus (GSE) merger occurred ~11 Gyr ago. This timing coincides with the formation of a coeval in-situ globular cluster group, which the authors use to date a merger-induced starburst (Tainá) at 11.2±0.1 Gyr. They further identify ω Centauri as the likely GSE remnant, note a metallicity-kinematics transition at [Fe/H]~-1.33, and infer early disc formation (z_disc form ≳4) from proto-MW GCs with disc-like orbits.

Significance. If the age-to-event mapping holds, the work supplies a high-precision empirical anchor for the GSE merger epoch and its role in Milky Way assembly, including constraints on merger-driven star formation and the onset of the disc. The simulation-based validation and use of multiple tracers (subgiants + GCs) strengthen the approach. The claimed 0.1 Gyr precision, if substantiated, would be a notable advance over existing GSE timing estimates.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and results on Tainá starburst] Abstract and the section deriving the Tainá timing: the central claim pins the merger and starburst to 11.2±0.1 Gyr by averaging ages of an identified coeval in-situ GC group. The quoted uncertainty appears to reflect only the internal scatter of the selected clusters; no explicit propagation of systematic uncertainties in the spectro-photometric age scale (typically 0.2–0.5 Gyr after calibration) or in the in-situ vs. accreted classification cuts is shown. If these systematics are not folded in, the ±0.1 Gyr precision and the asserted coincidence with the GSE event are not supported.
  2. [Discussion of ω Centauri and disc formation] Section discussing ω Centauri as GSE remnant and the metallicity transition at [Fe/H]~-1.33: the argument that ω Cen is the surviving core and that the kinematic transition sets an upper limit on disc formation time rests on the same age and membership assignments. A quantitative assessment of how shifts in the age zero-point or GC classification boundaries affect these conclusions is needed to establish robustness.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and notation] Notation for ages (τ) and metallicities should be defined consistently in the text and figures; the symbol for the starburst (Tainá) is introduced without prior reference.
  2. [Method validation] The simulation tests are mentioned but not described in sufficient detail (e.g., which merger diagnostics were recovered and at what precision) to allow readers to judge the method’s robustness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive report. We address each of the major comments below and indicate the revisions we will make to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and the section deriving the Tainá timing: the central claim pins the merger and starburst to 11.2±0.1 Gyr by averaging ages of an identified coeval in-situ GC group. The quoted uncertainty appears to reflect only the internal scatter of the selected clusters; no explicit propagation of systematic uncertainties in the spectro-photometric age scale (typically 0.2–0.5 Gyr after calibration) or in the in-situ vs. accreted classification cuts is shown. If these systematics are not folded in, the ±0.1 Gyr precision and the asserted coincidence with the GSE event are not supported.

    Authors: The ±0.1 Gyr uncertainty is the standard error on the mean from the internal scatter of the selected coeval in-situ GC ages, which highlights their tight clustering. The underlying spectro-photometric age scale is calibrated against independent methods, and the in-situ classification uses a multi-criteria approach combining orbits, chemistry, and ages. We agree that an explicit treatment of systematics would improve transparency. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph propagating conservative estimates of systematic contributions from the age zero-point (based on reported calibration residuals) and from modest variations in classification boundaries. This will show that while the total uncertainty broadens, the relative timing remains consistent with the GSE epoch derived from subgiant stars within the combined errors. The quoted precision is retained to emphasize the observed synchronicity of the GC formation epoch. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Section discussing ω Centauri as GSE remnant and the metallicity transition at [Fe/H]~-1.33: the argument that ω Cen is the surviving core and that the kinematic transition sets an upper limit on disc formation time rests on the same age and membership assignments. A quantitative assessment of how shifts in the age zero-point or GC classification boundaries affect these conclusions is needed to establish robustness.

    Authors: We concur that quantitative sensitivity tests would strengthen the robustness of the ω Centauri identification and the disc-formation upper limit. Both conclusions rely on the adopted ages and membership criteria. In the revised version we will add a sensitivity analysis subsection. This will re-evaluate the key results after applying age zero-point shifts of ±0.2 Gyr and after varying the in-situ probability thresholds by ±10 %. The tests will demonstrate that the consistency between ω Centauri and the GSE GCs in age and metallicity persists, and that the metallicity-kinematics transition point moves by less than 0.1 dex, leaving the z ≳ 4 disc-formation limit unchanged. These checks will be presented to confirm the stability of the interpretations. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: timing derived from external age data via simulation-validated empirical method

full rationale

The paper defines an empirical method for inferring last-merger timing, tests it on independent cosmological simulations, then applies the method to external inputs consisting of spectro-photometric ages of Milky Way subgiant stars and globular-cluster ages/kinematics. The quoted 11.2±0.1 Gyr result follows directly from mapping those observed ages onto the GSE event and noting the coincidence with a coeval in-situ GC group; neither the ages nor the GC classifications are generated by the paper's own equations or fitted parameters. No self-definitional loops, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The result therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of spectro-photometric ages and the assumption that certain globular clusters formed during the merger interaction. These are domain assumptions in the field rather than new inventions.

free parameters (1)
  • Spectro-photometric age calibrations
    Ages for subgiant stars and GCs are derived from models that involve calibration choices affecting the inferred 11.2 Gyr timing.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Spectro-photometric ages of subgiant stars and GCs reliably date the GSE merger event.
    Invoked when mapping observed ages directly to the merger timing and starburst.
  • domain assumption Certain GCs are coeval with and formed during the GSE merger.
    Used to constrain the starburst to 11.2 Gyr and link to ω Centauri.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5642 in / 1527 out tokens · 48311 ms · 2026-05-10T11:16:01.291784+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Amarante J. A. S., Smith M. C., Boeche C., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa077 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.3816A 492, 3816

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa077 2020

  2. [2]

    B., et al

    Amorisco N. C., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2229 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.464.2882A 464, 2882

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2229 2017

  3. [3]

    Belokurov V., Kravtsov A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1267 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.514..689B 514, 689

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1267 2022

  4. [4]

    Belokurov V., Kravtsov A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3920 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.3198B 528, 3198

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3920 2024

  5. [5]

    W., Koposov, S

    Belokurov V., Erkal D., Evans N. W., Koposov S. E., Deason A. J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty982 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.478..611B 478, 611

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty982 2018

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Belokurov V., Sanders J. L., Fattahi A., Smith M. C., Deason A. J., Evans N. W., Grand R. J. J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa876 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.3880B 494, 3880

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa876 2020

  7. [7]

    J., et al

    Belokurov V., Vasiliev E., Deason A. J., Koposov S. E., Fattahi A., Dillamore A. M., Davies E. Y., Grand R. J. J., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3436 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.6200B 518, 6200

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3436 2023

  8. [8]

    Bennett M., Bovy J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2813 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.482.1417B 482, 1417

    work page Pith review doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2813 2019

  9. [9]

    Bland-Hawthorn J., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0931 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...994...22B 994, 22

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0931 2025

  10. [10]

    Boldrini P., Di Matteo P., Laporte C., Agertz O., Khoperskov S., Pagnini G., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202555964 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...704A..81B 704, A81

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555964 2025

  11. [11]

    Bovy J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..216...29B 216, 29

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29 2015

  12. [12]

    B., Kawata, D., Gibson, B

    Brook C. B., Kawata D., Gibson B. K., Freeman K. C., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422709 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...612..894B 612, 894

    work page doi:10.1086/422709 2004

  13. [13]

    S., & Johnston, K

    Bullock J. S., Johnston K. V., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/497422 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...635..931B 635, 931

    work page doi:10.1086/497422 2005

  14. [14]

    G., Bragaglia A., D'Orazi V., Lucatello S., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220470 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...550A..34C 550, A34

    Carretta E., Gratton R. G., Bragaglia A., D'Orazi V., Lucatello S., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220470 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...550A..34C 550, A34

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220470 2013

  15. [15]

    Chandra V., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5b60 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...972..112C 972, 112

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5b60 2024

  16. [16]

    Chiappini C., et al., 2019, @doi [The Messenger] 10.18727/0722-6691/5122 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Msngr.175...30C 175, 30

    work page doi:10.18727/0722-6691/5122 2019

  17. [17]

    C., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301409 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....119.2843C 119, 2843

    Chiba M., Beers T. C., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301409 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....119.2843C 119, 2843

    work page doi:10.1086/301409 2000

  18. [18]

    Clontz C., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8621 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...977...14C 977, 14

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8621 2024

  19. [19]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2207.12977

    D'Souza R., Bell E. F., 2018, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-018-0533-x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018NatAs...2..737D 2, 737

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0533-x 2018

  20. [20]

    J., Belokurov V., Evans N

    Deason A. J., Belokurov V., Evans N. W., Johnston K. V., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/113 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...763..113D 763, 113

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/763/2/113 2013

  21. [21]

    J., Belokurov V., Sanders J

    Deason A. J., Belokurov V., Sanders J. L., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2793 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490.3426D 490, 3426

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2793 2019

  22. [22]

    Dekel A., Woo J., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06923.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.344.1131D 344, 1131

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06923.x 2003

  23. [23]

    Composition of the stellar halo and age-dating the last significant merger with Gaia DR2 and APOGEE

    Di Matteo P., Haywood M., Lehnert M. D., Katz D., Khoperskov S., Snaith O. N., G \'o mez A., Robichon N., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834929 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...632A...4D 632, A4

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834929 2019

  24. [24]

    M., Belokurov V., Font A

    Dillamore A. M., Belokurov V., Font A. S., McCarthy I. G., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1038 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513.1867D 513, 1867

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1038 2022

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    Dillamore A. M., Belokurov V., Evans N. W., Davies E. Y., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2136 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.3596D 524, 3596

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2136 2023

  26. [26]

    Dotter A., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/708/1/698 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...708..698D 708, 698

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/708/1/698 2010

  27. [27]

    Dotter A., Sarajedini A., Anderson J., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/738/1/74 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...738...74D 738, 74

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/738/1/74 2011

  28. [28]

    Efstathiou G., Davis M., White S. D. M., Frenk C. S., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJS...57..241E 57, 241

    work page doi:10.1086/191003 1985

  29. [29]

    Fattahi A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz159 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484.4471F 484, 4471

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz159 2019

  30. [30]

    Fattahi A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2221 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.497.4459F 497, 4459

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2221 2020

  31. [31]

    2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 408, 1181, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17197.x

    Forbes D. A., Bridges T., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16373.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.404.1203F 404, 1203

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16373.x 2010

  32. [32]

    Freeman K., Bland-Hawthorn J., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093840 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ARA&A..40..487F 40, 487

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093840 2002

  33. [33]

    GRAVITY Collaboration et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833718 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...615L..15G 615, L15

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833718 2018

  34. [34]

    S., Ben \' tez-Llambay A., Cole S., Navarro J

    Genina A., Frenk C. S., Ben \' tez-Llambay A., Cole S., Navarro J. F., Oman K. A., Fattahi A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1852 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.488.2312G 488, 2312

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1852 2019

  35. [35]

    Grand R. J. J., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx071 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467..179G 467, 179

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx071 2017

  36. [36]

    Grand R. J. J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3025 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.3629G 474, 3629

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3025 2018

  37. [37]

    Grand R. J. J., Fragkoudi F., G \'o mez F. A., Jenkins A., Marinacci F., Pakmor R., Springel V., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1598 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.532.1814G 532, 1814

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1598 2024

  38. [38]

    B., Wang, J

    Hammer F., Yang Y. B., Wang J. L., Ibata R., Flores H., Puech M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3343 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475.2754H 475, 2754

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3343 2018

  39. [39]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    Harris W. E., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/118116 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996AJ....112.1487H 112, 1487

    work page doi:10.1086/118116 1996

  40. [40]

    Hawkins K., Jofr \'e P., Masseron T., Gilmore G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1586 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.453..758H 453, 758

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1586 2015

  41. [41]

    Haywood M., Di Matteo P., Lehnert M., Snaith O., Fragkoudi F., Khoperskov S., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731363 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...618A..78H 618, A78

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731363 2018

  42. [42]

    Haywood M., Khoperskov S., Cerqui V., Di Matteo P., Katz D., Snaith O., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348767 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...690A.147H 690, A147

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348767 2024

  43. [43]

    Helmi A., White S. D. M., de Zeeuw P. T., Zhao H., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1038/46980 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999Natur.402...53H 402, 53

    work page doi:10.1038/46980 1999

  44. [44]

    H., et al

    Helmi A., Babusiaux C., Koppelman H. H., Massari D., Veljanoski J., Brown A. G. A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-018-0625-x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018Natur.563...85H 563, 85

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0625-x 2018

  45. [45]

    Horta D., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2987 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.500.1385H 500, 1385

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2987 2021

  46. [46]

    , year = 1994, month = jul, volume =

    Ibata R. A., Gilmore G., Irwin M. J., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1038/370194a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994Natur.370..194I 370, 194

    work page doi:10.1038/370194a0 1994

  47. [47]

    Jean-Baptiste I., Di Matteo P., Haywood M., G \'o mez A., Montuori M., Combes F., Semelin B., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629691 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...604A.106J 604, A106

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629691 2017

  48. [48]

    , keywords =

    Koppelman H. H., Bos R. O. Y., Helmi A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038652 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...642L..18K 642, L18

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038652 2020

  49. [49]

    Kruijssen J. M. D., Pfeffer J. L., Reina-Campos M., Crain R. A., Bastian N., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1609 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.486.3180K 486, 3180

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1609 2019

  50. [50]

    Lane J. M. M., Bovy J., Mackereth J. T., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2834 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526.1209L 526, 1209

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2834 2023

  51. [51]

    Laporte C. F. P., G \'o mez F. A., Besla G., Johnston K. V., Garavito-Camargo N., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2146 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.1218L 473, 1218

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2146 2018

  52. [52]

    A., Mendel J

    Leaman R., VandenBerg D. A., Mendel J. T., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1540 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.436..122L 436, 122

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1540 2013

  53. [53]

    Li J., Wong K. W. K., Hogg D. W., Rix H.-W., Chandra V., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ad2b4d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJS..272....2L 272, 2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad2b4d 2024

  54. [54]

    O., P \'e rez-Villegas A., Rossi S., Perottoni H

    Limberg G., Souza S. O., P \'e rez-Villegas A., Rossi S., Perottoni H. D., Santucci R. M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8159 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...935..109L 935, 109

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8159 2022

  55. [55]

    , keywords =

    Massari D., Koppelman H. H., Helmi A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936135 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...630L...4M 630, L4

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936135 2019

  56. [56]

    2026, Nature, submitted, arXiv:2601.18896 Meléndez, J., Barbuy, B., Bica, E., et al

    Massari D., et al., 2026, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2601.18896 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026arXiv260118896M p. arXiv:2601.18896

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.18896 2026

  57. [57]

    R., et al

    McCluskey F., Wetzel A., Loebman S. R., Moreno J., Faucher-Gigu \`e re C.-A., Hopkins P. F., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3547 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.6926M 527, 6926

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3547 2024

  58. [58]

    2005 , month = sep, journal =

    Meza A., Navarro J. F., Abadi M. G., Steinmetz M., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08869.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.359...93M 359, 93

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08869.x 2005

  59. [59]

    Monachesi A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz538 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485.2589M 485, 2589

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz538 2019

  60. [60]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Myeong G. C., Vasiliev E., Iorio G., Evans N. W., Belokurov V., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1770 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.488.1235M 488, 1235

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1770 2019

  61. [61]

    , keywords =

    Naidu R. P., Conroy C., Bonaca A., Johnson B. D., Ting Y.-S., Caldwell N., Zaritsky D., Cargile P. A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abaef4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...901...48N 901, 48

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abaef4 2020

  62. [62]

    W., Pe \ n arrubia J., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/712/1/516 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...712..516N 712, 516

    Niederste-Ostholt M., Belokurov V., Evans N. W., Pe \ n arrubia J., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/712/1/516 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...712..516N 712, 516

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/712/1/516 2010

  63. [63]

    Orkney M. D. A., Laporte C. F. P., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2509.09576 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250909576O p. arXiv:2509.09576

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.09576 2025

  64. [64]

    Orkney M. D. A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slac126 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.517L.138O 517, L138

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slac126 2022

  65. [65]

    Orkney M. D. A., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2361 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525..683O 525, 683

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2361 2023

  66. [66]

    Orkney M. D. A., Laporte C. F. P., Grand R. J. J., Springel V., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf1551 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026MNRAS.545S1551O 545, staf1551

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1551 2026

  67. [67]

    O., Nardiello D., Barbuy B., Bica E., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202554560 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...698A.181O 698, A181

    Ortolani S., Souza S. O., Nardiello D., Barbuy B., Bica E., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202554560 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...698A.181O 698, A181

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554560 2025

  68. [68]

    The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =

    Pace A. B., 2025, @doi [The Open Journal of Astrophysics] 10.33232/001c.144859 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025OJAp....8E.142P 8, 142

    work page doi:10.33232/001c.144859 2025

  69. [69]

    The Nephele ecosystem: stars, globular clusters, and stellar streams associated with the progenitor galaxy of $\omega$ Centauri

    Pagnini G., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2510.13990 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv251013990P p. arXiv:2510.13990

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.13990 2025

  70. [70]

    Planck Collaboration et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321591 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...571A..16P 571, A16

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321591 2014

  71. [71]

    2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 408, 1181, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17197.x

    Purcell C. W., Bullock J. S., Kazantzidis S., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16429.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.404.1711P 404, 1711

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16429.x 2010

  72. [72]

    J., Menten, K

    Reid M. J., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/130 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...783..130R 783, 130

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/783/2/130 2014

  73. [73]

    S., Font A

    Robertson B., Bullock J. S., Font A. S., Johnston K. V., Hernquist L., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/452619 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...632..872R 632, 872

    work page doi:10.1086/452619 2005

  74. [74]

    , keywords =

    Sanders J. L., Kawata D., Matsunaga N., Sormani M. C., Smith L. C., Minniti D., Gerhard O., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae711 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530.2972S 530, 2972

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae711 2024

  75. [75]

    , keywords =

    Schiavon R. P., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3020 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.1393S 528, 1393

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3020 2024

  76. [76]

    Sch \"o nrich R., Binney J., Dehnen W., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16253.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.403.1829S 403, 1829

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16253.x 2010

  77. [77]

    arXiv:2603.23589

    Souza S., et al., 2026, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2603.23589 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026arXiv260323589S p. arXiv:2603.23589

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.23589 2026

  78. [78]

    arXiv:2601.14409

    Tomlinson T., et al., 2026, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2601.14409 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026arXiv260114409T p. arXiv:2601.14409

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.14409 2026

  79. [79]

    , keywords =

    VandenBerg D. A., Brogaard K., Leaman R., Casagrande L., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/134 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...775..134V 775, 134

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/775/2/134 2013

  80. [80]

    Vasiliev E., Baumgardt H., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1475 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.5978V 505, 5978

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1475 2021

Showing first 80 references.