pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14679 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · ⚛️ physics.optics · quant-ph

Observation of Restored Adiabatic State Transfer in Time-Modulated Non-Hermitian Systems

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 10:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics quant-ph
keywords exceptional pointsnon-Hermitian systemsadiabatic state transferchiral mode switchingphotonic systemstime-modulated systemssymmetric state transferoptical switches
0
0 comments X

The pith

Steering a two-mode photonic system along designed parameter trajectories makes the non-Hermitian evolution operator acquire a purely real spectrum, restoring symmetric adiabatic state transfer.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Non-Hermitian systems with exceptional points normally produce chiral, direction-dependent mode switching because their complex spectra break adiabaticity during parameter encircling. This paper shows that specific trajectories through the two-dimensional parameter space of a two-mode photonic setup can be chosen so the time-dependent evolution operator has a purely real spectrum instead. The same hardware then supports both the restored symmetric adiabatic transfer and the usual chiral non-adiabatic behavior, depending on the chosen path. If the result holds, it supplies a practical way to toggle between these regimes on demand for optical state control.

Core claim

By steering a two-mode photonic setup along specifically designed trajectories in parameter space, the associated non-Hermitian evolution operator acquires a purely real spectrum. This restores truly adiabatic and thus symmetric state transfer, independent of encircling direction, in contrast to the chiral switching that arises from the complex spectrum when exceptional points are encircled. The experimental platform further permits controlled switching between the symmetric adiabatic and chiral non-adiabatic regimes for the same pair of initial modes, thereby realizing a universal symmetric-asymmetric two-mode switch.

What carries the argument

Designed trajectories in the two-mode parameter space that force the time-modulated non-Hermitian evolution operator to possess a purely real spectrum.

If this is right

  • Symmetric adiabatic state transfer becomes possible in non-Hermitian systems even when exceptional points are present.
  • The same photonic platform can be switched on demand between adiabatic symmetric and non-adiabatic chiral regimes.
  • A universal two-mode switch for symmetric versus asymmetric transfer is realized.
  • New design routes open for versatile optical wave-manipulation devices and for classical and quantum information applications.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Trajectory designs of this type could be tested in other non-Hermitian platforms such as acoustic or electronic resonators to check whether real spectra and symmetric transfer appear there as well.
  • Optimizing the trajectories might yield protocols that remain adiabatic over a wider range of modulation speeds or small perturbations.
  • The regime-switching capability suggests possible extensions to multi-mode systems for more complex state routing in optical networks.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the experimentally followed trajectories in the two-mode photonic system produce a purely real spectrum for the evolution operator without meaningful deviations caused by fabrication imperfections, losses, or unmodeled dynamics.

What would settle it

If following the designed trajectories still produces chiral, direction-dependent state transfer rather than symmetric transfer, the spectrum would not be purely real and the claim of restored adiabaticity would be disproved.

read the original abstract

Exceptional points (EPs) have attracted extensive research interest due to their intriguing properties. One of the hallmarks of EP physics is that dynamically encircling the EPs induces chiral mode switching, arising from the breakdown of adiabaticity due to the presence of a complex spectrum in the system's Hamiltonian. While such chiral mode behavior has been widely observed experimentally, achieving truly adiabatic, and thus symmetric, state transfer, regardless of the winding direction, in time-modulated non-Hermitian systems has remained elusive. In this work, we demonstrate that this long-sought adiabatic state dynamics can indeed be restored. By steering a two-mode photonic setup along specifically designed trajectories in parameter space, we realize conditions where the associated non-Hermitian evolution operator acquires a purely real spectrum. Moreover, our experimental platform enables controlled switching between symmetric (adiabatic) and chiral (non-adiabatic) state-transfer regimes for the same set of initial modes, thus effectively implementing a universal symmetric-asymmetric two-mode switch. Our results therefore open new avenues for harnessing unique topological spectral properties of non-Hermitian systems, paving the way for the practical design of versatile optical wave-manipulation devices and for advancing both classical and quantum information technologies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental observation of restored adiabatic state transfer in a time-modulated non-Hermitian two-mode photonic system. By steering the system along specifically designed trajectories in parameter space, the authors claim to realize conditions under which the non-Hermitian evolution operator acquires a purely real spectrum, enabling symmetric (truly adiabatic) state transfer independent of encircling direction around exceptional points. The work also demonstrates controlled switching between this symmetric regime and the usual chiral (non-adiabatic) regime for the same initial modes, implementing a universal two-mode switch.

Significance. If the experimental verification of the real-spectrum condition holds, the result is significant because it directly addresses the long-standing breakdown of adiabaticity in non-Hermitian systems encircling exceptional points, where complex spectra typically enforce chiral mode switching. The ability to restore symmetric transfer and switch regimes on demand could enable new classes of optical wave-manipulation devices and advance both classical and quantum information technologies. The experimental platform for controlled switching between regimes is a clear strength.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim that the non-Hermitian evolution operator acquires a purely real spectrum (and thereby restores adiabaticity) is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no explicit experimental data, error analysis, or verification (such as extracted eigenvalues, transmission spectra, or comparison of imaginary parts to zero) to confirm the spectrum is real rather than perturbed by small imaginary components.
  2. The weakest assumption—that the fabricated two-mode photonic trajectories accurately reproduce the ideal non-Hermitian model without significant deviations from fabrication imperfections, material losses, or unaccounted couplings—is not addressed with quantitative bounds, sensitivity analysis, or robustness checks in the experimental implementation.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figure captions and the experimental methods section would benefit from additional detail on measurement conditions, error bars, and how the trajectories were calibrated in the physical device.
  2. The abstract could more explicitly state the photonic platform (e.g., waveguide or resonator type) and the number of modes involved for immediate clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions that will be made to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central claim that the non-Hermitian evolution operator acquires a purely real spectrum (and thereby restores adiabaticity) is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no explicit experimental data, error analysis, or verification (such as extracted eigenvalues, transmission spectra, or comparison of imaginary parts to zero) to confirm the spectrum is real rather than perturbed by small imaginary components.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification of the real-spectrum condition would make the central claim more robust. While the manuscript demonstrates symmetric state transfer in both encircling directions, which is only possible for a real spectrum, we did not include direct eigenvalue extraction, transmission spectra, or quantitative comparison of imaginary parts. In the revised manuscript we will add these data, including error analysis and a demonstration that any residual imaginary components lie within experimental uncertainty, either in the main text or as supplementary material. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The weakest assumption—that the fabricated two-mode photonic trajectories accurately reproduce the ideal non-Hermitian model without significant deviations from fabrication imperfections, material losses, or unaccounted couplings—is not addressed with quantitative bounds, sensitivity analysis, or robustness checks in the experimental implementation.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not provide quantitative bounds on deviations from the ideal model. The experimental results show good agreement with theory, but this agreement alone does not constitute a full sensitivity analysis. In the revision we will add a dedicated discussion (or supplementary note) that includes estimates of fabrication tolerances, material-loss contributions, and numerical robustness checks under small perturbations to the designed trajectories. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental observation of designed trajectories in non-Hermitian photonic system

full rationale

The paper is an experimental demonstration rather than a theoretical derivation. It designs trajectories in parameter space based on standard non-Hermitian EP physics to achieve a real spectrum for the evolution operator, then implements and measures the resulting symmetric state transfer in a two-mode photonic setup. No step reduces a claimed prediction or first-principles result to its own inputs by construction, fitted parameters, or self-citation chains. The central result is the physical realization and observation, which stands or falls on experimental fidelity to the model rather than tautological redefinition. This is the expected non-circular outcome for an observation paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard non-Hermitian quantum mechanics and the validity of the two-mode effective Hamiltonian model for the photonic platform. No new entities are postulated. Specific trajectory parameters are designed but not quantified in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The two-mode photonic system is accurately described by a time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian whose spectrum can be made real by suitable parameter trajectories.
    Invoked implicitly when stating that designed trajectories yield a purely real spectrum for the evolution operator.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5545 in / 1349 out tokens · 26070 ms · 2026-05-10T10:47:38.672379+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Non- Hermitian physics and PT symmetry,

    R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Non- Hermitian physics and PT symmetry,” Nat. Phys.14, 11 (2018)

  2. [2]

    Exceptional points in open quantum systems,

    M. Müller and I. Rotter, “Exceptional points in open quantum systems,” J. Phys. A41, 244018 (2008)

  3. [3]

    Exceptional points in optics and photonics,

    M.-A. Miri and A. Alù, “Exceptional points in optics and photonics,” Science363, eaar7709 (2019)

  4. [4]

    Quantum heat engines: Limit cycles and ex- ceptional points,

    A. Insinga, B. Andresen, P. Salamon, and Ronnie Kosloff, “Quantum heat engines: Limit cycles and ex- ceptional points,” Phys. Rev. E97, 062153 (2018)

  5. [5]

    Unidirectional invisibility in- duced by PT-symmetric periodic structures,

    Z. Lin, H. Ramezani, T. Eichelkraut, T. Kottos, H. Cao, and D.N. Christodoulides, “Unidirectional invisibility in- duced by PT-symmetric periodic structures,” Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 213901 (2011)

  6. [6]

    Experimental demonstration of a unidirectional reflec- tionless parity-time metamaterial at optical frequencies,

    L. Feng, Y.-L. Xu, W. S. Fegadolli, M.-H. Lu, J. E. B. Oliveira, V. R. Almedia, Y.-F. Chen, and A. Scherer, “Experimental demonstration of a unidirectional reflec- tionless parity-time metamaterial at optical frequencies,” Nat. Mater.12, 108 (2013)

  7. [7]

    Chiral modes and directional lasing at ex- ceptional points,

    B. Peng, S. K. Özdemir, M. Liertzer, W. Chen, J. Kramer, H. Yılmaz, J. Wiersig, S. Rotter, and L. Yang, “Chiral modes and directional lasing at ex- ceptional points,” Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.113, 6845–6850 (2016)

  8. [8]

    Metrology with PT- symmetric cavities: enhanced sensitivity near the PT- phase transition,

    Z. Liu, J. Zhang, Ş. K. Özdemir, B. Peng, H. Jing, X. Lü, C. Li, L. Yang, F. Nori, and Y. Liu, “Metrology with PT- symmetric cavities: enhanced sensitivity near the PT- phase transition,” Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 110802 (2016)

  9. [9]

    Parity-time–symmetric microring lasers,

    H. Hodaei, M. Miri, M. Heinrich, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, “Parity-time–symmetric microring lasers,” Science346, 975 (2014)

  10. [10]

    Loss-induced suppression and revival of las- ing,

    B. Peng, S. K. Özdemir, S. Rotter, H. Yilmaz, M. Liertzer, F. Monifi, C. M. Bender, F. Nori, and L. Yang, “Loss-induced suppression and revival of las- ing,” Science346, 328 (2014)

  11. [11]

    Topological modes in a laser cavity through exceptional state transfer,

    A. Schumer, Y.G.N. Liu, J. Leshin, L. Ding, Y. Alah- madi, A. U. Hassan, H. Nasari, S. Rotter, D.N. Christodoulides, P. LiKamWa, and M. Khajavikhan, “Topological modes in a laser cavity through exceptional state transfer,” Science375, 884–888 (2022)

  12. [12]

    Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order excep- tional points,

    H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia1, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Kha- javikhan, “Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order excep- tional points,” Nature (London)548, 187 (2017)

  13. [13]

    Exceptional points enhance sensing in an opti- cal microcavity,

    W. Chen, Ş. Kaya Özdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, “Exceptional points enhance sensing in an opti- cal microcavity,” Nature548, 192–196 (2017)

  14. [14]

    Quantum noise theory of exceptional point amplifyingsensors,

    M. Zhang, W. Sweeney, C. W. Hsu, L. Yang, A. D. Stone, and L. Jiang, “Quantum noise theory of exceptional point amplifyingsensors,” Phys.Rev.Lett.123,180501(2019)

  15. [15]

    Shortcuts to adiabatic state transfer in time-modulated two-level non-Hermitian systems,

    Q.-C. Wu, J. Zhao, Y. Zhou, B. Ye, Y. Fang, Z.-W. Zhou, and C.-P. Yang, “Shortcuts to adiabatic state transfer in time-modulated two-level non-Hermitian systems,” Phys. Rev. A111, 022410 (2025)

  16. [16]

    Experimental realization of on-chip few-photon control around excep- 10 tional points,

    P. Song, X. Ruan, H. Ding, S. Li, M. Chen, R. Huang, L. Kuang, Q. Zhao, J. Tsai, H. Jing, L. Yang, F. Nori, D. Zheng, Y. Liu, J. Zhang, and Z. Peng, “Experimental realization of on-chip few-photon control around excep- 10 tional points,” Nat. Commun.15, 9848 (2024)

  17. [17]

    Parity- time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics,

    Ş. K. Özdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, “Parity- time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics,” Nat. Mater.18, 783 (2019)

  18. [18]

    Non-Hermitian physics,

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, “Non-Hermitian physics,” Adv. Phys.69, 249–435 (2020)

  19. [19]

    Repulsion of resonance states and excep- tional points,

    W. D. Heiss, “Repulsion of resonance states and excep- tional points,” Phys. Rev. E61, 929–932 (2000)

  20. [20]

    Exceptional points in atomic spectra,

    H. Cartarius, J. Main, and G. Wunner, “Exceptional points in atomic spectra,” Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 173003 (2007)

  21. [21]

    Experimen- tal observation of the topological structure of exceptional points,

    C. Dembowski, H.-D. Gräf, H. L. Harney, A. Heine, W. D. Heiss, H. Rehfeld, and A. Richter, “Experimen- tal observation of the topological structure of exceptional points,” Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 787–790 (2001)

  22. [22]

    Exceptional points in a mi- crowave billiard with time-reversal invariance violation,

    B. Dietz, H. L. Harney, O. N. Kirillov, M. Miski-Oglu, A. Richter, and F. Schäfer, “Exceptional points in a mi- crowave billiard with time-reversal invariance violation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 150403 (2011)

  23. [23]

    Observation of non-Hermitian degenera- cies in a chaotic exciton-polariton billiard,

    T. Gaoet al., “Observation of non-Hermitian degenera- cies in a chaotic exciton-polariton billiard,” Nature (Lon- don)526, 554–558 (2015)

  24. [24]

    Emergence, coalescence, and topological properties of multiple exceptional points and their experimental real- ization,

    K. Ding, G. Ma, M. Xiao, Z. Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, “Emergence, coalescence, and topological properties of multiple exceptional points and their experimental real- ization,” Phys. Rev. X6, 021007 (2016)

  25. [25]

    Topological engineering of ter- ahertz light using electrically tunable exceptional point singularities,

    M. S. Ergoktaset al., “Topological engineering of ter- ahertz light using electrically tunable exceptional point singularities,” Science376, 184–188 (2022)

  26. [26]

    Resolving the topology of encircling multiple exceptional points,

    C. Guria, Q. Zhong, Ş. K. Özdemir,et al., “Resolving the topology of encircling multiple exceptional points,” Nat. Commun.15, 1369 (2024)

  27. [27]

    Dynamically encircling an ex- ceptional point for asymmetric mode switching,

    J. Doppler, A. A. Mailybaev, J. Böhm, U. Kuhl, A. Girschik, F. Libisch, T. J. Milburn, P. Rabl, N. Moi- seyev, and S. Rotter, “Dynamically encircling an ex- ceptional point for asymmetric mode switching,” Nature (London)537, 76 (2016)

  28. [28]

    Dynamically encircling ex- ceptional points: Exact evolution and polarization state conversion,

    A. U. Hassan, B. Zhen, M. Soljačić, M. Khajavikhan, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Dynamically encircling ex- ceptional points: Exact evolution and polarization state conversion,” Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 093002 (2017)

  29. [29]

    Topologicalenergytransferinanoptomechanicalsystem with exceptional points,

    H. Xu, D. Mason, Luyao Jiang, and J. G. E. Harris, “Topologicalenergytransferinanoptomechanicalsystem with exceptional points,” Nature (London)537, 80–83 (2016)

  30. [30]

    Time-asymmetric loop around an exceptional point over the full optical communications band,

    J. W. Yoon, Y. Choi, C. Hahn, G. Kim, S. H. Song, K. Y. Yang, J. Y. Lee, Y. Kim, C. Lee, J. Shin, H. Lee, and P. Berini, “Time-asymmetric loop around an exceptional point over the full optical communications band,” Nature (London)562, 86 (2018)

  31. [31]

    Dy- namically encircling exceptional points: In situ control of encircling loops and the role of the starting point,

    X.-L. Zhang, S. Wang, B. Hou, and C. T. Chan, “Dy- namically encircling exceptional points: In situ control of encircling loops and the role of the starting point,” Phys. Rev. X8, 021066 (2018)

  32. [32]

    Dynami- cally encircling an exceptional point in anti-parity-time symmetric systems: asymmetric mode switching for symmetry-broken modes,

    X.-L. Zhang, T. Jiang, and C. T. Chan, “Dynami- cally encircling an exceptional point in anti-parity-time symmetric systems: asymmetric mode switching for symmetry-broken modes,” Light Sci. Appl.8, 88 (2019)

  33. [33]

    En- circling exceptional points as a non-Hermitian extension of rapid adiabatic passage,

    J. Feilhauer, A. Schumer, J. Doppler, A. A. Mailybaev, J. Böhm, U. Kuhl, N. Moiseyev, and S. Rotter, “En- circling exceptional points as a non-Hermitian extension of rapid adiabatic passage,” Phys. Rev. A102, 040201 (2020)

  34. [34]

    Dy- namically encircling an exceptional point in a real quan- tum system,

    W. Liu, Y. Wu, C. Duan, X. Rong, and J. F. Du, “Dy- namically encircling an exceptional point in a real quan- tum system,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 170506 (2021)

  35. [35]

    Harnessing dynamical encircling of an exceptional point in anti-PT-symmetric integrated photonic systems,

    Z. Feng and X. Sun, “Harnessing dynamical encircling of an exceptional point in anti-PT-symmetric integrated photonic systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 273601 (2022)

  36. [36]

    Highly efficient trans- fer of quantum state and robust generation of entangle- ment state around exceptional lines,

    Z. Tang, T. Chen, and X. Zhang, “Highly efficient trans- fer of quantum state and robust generation of entangle- ment state around exceptional lines,” Laser Photonics Rev.18, 2300794 (2023)

  37. [37]

    Photonicchiralstatetransferneartheliouvillian exceptional point,

    H. Gao, K. Sun, D. Qu, K. Wang, L. Xiao, W. Yi, and P.Xue,“Photonicchiralstatetransferneartheliouvillian exceptional point,” Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 146602 (2025)

  38. [38]

    On the ob- servability and asymmetry of adiabatic state flips gen- erated by exceptional points,

    R. Uzdin, A. Mailybaev, and N. Moiseyev, “On the ob- servability and asymmetry of adiabatic state flips gen- erated by exceptional points,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 44, 435302 (2011)

  39. [39]

    Optical polarization evolution near a non- Hermitian degeneracy,

    M. V. Berry, “Optical polarization evolution near a non- Hermitian degeneracy,” J. Opt.A13, 115701 (2011)

  40. [40]

    Breakdown of adiabatic transfer of light in waveguides in the presence of absorption,

    E.-M. Graefe, A. A. Mailybaev, and N. Moiseyev, “Breakdown of adiabatic transfer of light in waveguides in the presence of absorption,” Phys. Rev. A88, 033842 (2013)

  41. [41]

    Decoherence-induced exceptional points in a dissipative superconducting qubit,

    W. Chen, M. Abbasi, B. Ha, S. Erdamar, Y. N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, “Decoherence-induced exceptional points in a dissipative superconducting qubit,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 110402 (2022)

  42. [42]

    Restoring adiabatic state trans- fer in time-modulated non-Hermitian systems,

    I. I. Arkhipov, F. Minganti, A. Miranowicz, S. K. Özdemir, and F. Nori, “Restoring adiabatic state trans- fer in time-modulated non-Hermitian systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 113802 (2024)

  43. [43]

    Topological dissipa- tion in a time-multiplexed photonic resonator network,

    C. Leefmans, A. Dutt, J. Williams, L. Yuan, M. Parto, F. Nori, S. Fan, and A. Marandi, “Topological dissipa- tion in a time-multiplexed photonic resonator network,” Nat. Phys.18, 442 (2022)

  44. [44]

    Topological state permutations in time- modulated non-Hermitian multiqubit systems with sup- pressed nonadiabatic transitions,

    I. I. Arkhipov, P. Lewalle, F. Nori, Ş K. Özdemir, and K. B. Whaley, “Topological state permutations in time- modulated non-Hermitian multiqubit systems with sup- pressed nonadiabatic transitions,” Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033242 (2025)

  45. [45]

    Colloquium: Strong optical forces on atoms in multifrequency light,

    H. Metcalf, “Colloquium: Strong optical forces on atoms in multifrequency light,” Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 041001 (2017)

  46. [46]

    Observation of critical phenomena in parity-time-symmetric quantum dynam- ics,

    L. Xiao, K. Wang, X. Zhan, Z. Bian, K. Kawabata, M. Ueda, W. Yi, and P. Xue, “Observation of critical phenomena in parity-time-symmetric quantum dynam- ics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 230401 (2019)

  47. [47]

    Observation of chiral state transfer without encircling an exceptional point,

    H. Nasari, G. Lopez-Galmiche, H. E. Lopez-Aviles, A. Schumer, A. U. Hassan, Q. Zhong, S. Rotter, P. LiKamWa, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Kha- javikhan, “Observation of chiral state transfer without encircling an exceptional point,” Nature605, 256–261 (2022)

  48. [48]

    PT-symmetric photonic quantum systems with gain and loss do not exist,

    S. Scheel and A. Szameit, “PT-symmetric photonic quantum systems with gain and loss do not exist,” Euro- phys. Lett.122, 34001 (2018)

  49. [49]

    Observation of parity-time symmetry in quantum interference,

    F. Klauck, L. Teuber, M. Ornigotti, M. Heinrich, S. Scheel, and A. Szameit, “Observation of parity-time symmetry in quantum interference,” Nat. Photon.13, 883 (2019)

  50. [50]

    Dynamically crossing dia- bolic points while encircling exceptional curves: A pro- grammable symmetric-asymmetric multimode switch,

    I. I. Arkhipov, A. Miranowicz, F. Minganti, Ş. K. Özdemir, and F. Nori, “Dynamically crossing dia- bolic points while encircling exceptional curves: A pro- grammable symmetric-asymmetric multimode switch,” Nat. Commun.14, 2076 (2023). 11

  51. [51]

    Fast binomial-code holonomic quantum computation with ultrastrong light-matter coupling,

    Y. H. Chen, W. Qin, R. Stassi, X. Wang, and F. Nori, “Fast binomial-code holonomic quantum computation with ultrastrong light-matter coupling,” Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033275 (2021)

  52. [52]

    Geometric and holonomic quantum com- putation,

    J. Zhang, T. H. Kyaw, S. Filipp, L.-C. Kwek, E. Sjöqvist, and D. Tong, “Geometric and holonomic quantum com- putation,” Phys. Rep.1027, 1 (2023)

  53. [53]

    Multiphoton quantum communication in quantum networks,

    W. Qin, C. Wang, Y. Cao, and G. L. Long, “Multiphoton quantum communication in quantum networks,” Phys. Rev. A89, 062314 (2014)

  54. [54]

    A chip-scale polarization-spatial- momentum quantum swap gate in silicon nanophoton- ics,

    X. Cheng, K. C. Chang, Z. Xie, M. C. Sarihan, Y. S. Lee, Y. Li, X. A. Xu, A. K. Vinod, S. Kocaman, M. Yu, P. G. Q. Lo, D. L. Kwong, J. H. Shapiro, F. N. C. Wong, and C. W. Wong, “A chip-scale polarization-spatial- momentum quantum swap gate in silicon nanophoton- ics,” Nat. Photonics17, 656–665 (2023)

  55. [55]

    Holo- nomic surface codes for fault-tolerant quantum compu- tation,

    J. Zhang, S. J. Devitt, J. Q. You, and F. Nori, “Holo- nomic surface codes for fault-tolerant quantum compu- tation,” Phys. Rev. A97, 022335 (2018)

  56. [56]

    A chip-scale polarization-spatial-momentum quantum SWAP gate in silicon nanophotonics,

    X. Cheng, K.-Ch. Chang, Zh. Xie,et al., “A chip-scale polarization-spatial-momentum quantum SWAP gate in silicon nanophotonics,” Nat. Photon.17, 656–665 (2023)

  57. [57]

    Holonomic quantum compu- tation,

    P. Zanardi and M. Rasetti, “Holonomic quantum compu- tation,” Phys. Lett. A264, 94–99 (1999)

  58. [58]

    Geometric ma- nipulation of trapped ions for quantum computation,

    L.-M. Duan, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Geometric ma- nipulation of trapped ions for quantum computation,” Science292, 1695–1697 (2001)

  59. [59]

    Biorthogonal quantum mechanics,

    D. C. Brody, “Biorthogonal quantum mechanics,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.47, 035305 (2014)

  60. [60]

    Extension of noether’s theorem in PT-symmetry systems and its experimental demon- stration in an optical setup,

    Q. C. Wu, J. L. Zhao, Y. L. Fang, Y. Zhang, D. X. Chen, C. P. Yang, and F. Nori, “Extension of noether’s theorem in PT-symmetry systems and its experimental demon- stration in an optical setup,” Sci. China: Phys., Mech. Astron.66, 240312 (2023)

  61. [61]

    Non- Hermitian Hamiltonians and no-go theorems in quantum information,

    C.-Y.Ju, A.Miranowicz, G.-Y.Chen, andF.Nori,“Non- Hermitian Hamiltonians and no-go theorems in quantum information,” Phys. Rev. A100, 062118 (2019)

  62. [62]

    Pseudo-Hermitian representation of quantum mechanics,

    A. Mostafazadeh, “Pseudo-Hermitian representation of quantum mechanics,” Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 07, 1191 (2010)

  63. [63]

    A new calculus for the treatment of optical systems I. description and discussion of the calculus,

    R. C. Jones, “A new calculus for the treatment of optical systems I. description and discussion of the calculus,” J. Opt. Soc. Am.31, 488–493 (1941)

  64. [64]

    Hecht,Optics(Addison Wesley, New York, 2016)

    E. Hecht,Optics(Addison Wesley, New York, 2016)

  65. [65]

    Polarization optics of twisted single-mode fibers,

    R. Ulrich and A. Simon, “Polarization optics of twisted single-mode fibers,” Appl. Opt.18, 2241–2251 (1979)

  66. [66]

    A Kerr polariza- tion controller,

    N. Moroney, L. Del Bino, S. Zhang, M. Woodley, L. Hill, T. Wildi, V. J. Wittwer, T. Südmeyer, G.-L. Oppo, M.R. Vanner, V. Brasch, and P. Del’Haye, “A Kerr polariza- tion controller,” Nat. Commun.13, 398 (2022). 12 Supplementary Information CONTENTS Supplementary Note 1. Encircling Loops on the Hyperboloid Manifold in the 4D Parameter Space 13 Supplementar...