pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14777 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · physics.app-ph

Formalizing Poisson-Boltzmann Theory for Field-Tunable Nanofluidic Devices

Zhongyuan Zhao , Chudi Qi , Yuheng Li , Shoushan Fan , Qunqing Li , Yang Wei This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 10:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall physics.app-ph
keywords Poisson-Boltzmann theorynanofluidicselectric double layersionic transistorselectrostatic modulationion transportconductivity scaling
0
0 comments X

The pith

A reformulation of Poisson-Boltzmann theory classifies electric double layer regimes and creates a formal framework for field-tunable nanofluidic ion transport.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reformulates the Poisson-Boltzmann theory to map out distinct regimes of electric double layers in confined spaces subject to external fields. This mapping produces a unified framework that matches how conductivity scales with ion concentration in experiments and accounts for ionic transistors whose polarity can be reversed by applied voltages. The same framework identifies two hard thermodynamic bounds on how strongly electrostatic fields can control ion flow. A reader would care because the result supplies a predictive tool for designing nanoscale devices that move ions for energy storage or information processing.

Core claim

The central claim is that reformulating the Poisson-Boltzmann theory reveals distinct electric double layer regimes on the parameter space. From this classification a formal framework for tunable nanofluidic transport follows, one that reproduces observed conductivity-concentration scaling behaviors, rationalizes ionic transistors with reconfigurable polarities, and predicts two fundamental thermodynamic limits for electrostatic modulation at 60 mV/dec and 120 mV/dec.

What carries the argument

The classification of electric double layer regimes in the Poisson-Boltzmann parameter space, which organizes confined ion distributions under external fields and supplies the basis for the transport framework.

If this is right

  • The framework reproduces the observed conductivity-concentration scaling behaviors in nanofluidic devices.
  • It rationalizes the operation of ionic transistors with reconfigurable polarities.
  • It predicts two fundamental thermodynamic limits for electrostatic modulation at 60 mV/dec and 120 mV/dec.
  • The framework is accurate, generalizable, and extensible to a wide range of ion transports in confined spaces.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The regime map could be tested in biological nanopores to check whether the same mean-field limits appear when steric effects are weak.
  • Adding ion-size corrections to the framework would produce a clear, measurable shift in the predicted modulation limits at high concentrations.
  • Similar regime classifications might organize other field-tunable transport processes such as heat or neutral-molecule flow through the same nanochannels.
  • The two modulation limits set an inherent efficiency floor for any nanofluidic logic element that relies solely on electrostatic gating.

Load-bearing premise

The standard Poisson-Boltzmann mean-field description remains sufficient in strongly confined, field-tunable nanofluidic settings without corrections for steric effects, ion-specific interactions, or non-equilibrium dynamics.

What would settle it

Experimental measurements of conductivity versus concentration or electrostatic modulation that deviate systematically from the scalings and 60 mV/dec or 120 mV/dec limits predicted by the regime classification, especially at high ion densities, would falsify the sufficiency of the mean-field description.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14777 by Chudi Qi, Qunqing Li, Shoushan Fan, Yang Wei, Yuheng Li, Zhongyuan Zhao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) The configuration of the nanochannel model. (b-d) Schematic ion concentration profiles in the linear-response [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Stacking the mappings in Fig. 1 and plotting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Schematic of a nanofluidic device. (b) The gate-dielectric-electrolyte structure. (c, d) Conductance saturation with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Transistor behaviors at realistic conditions. (a, b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Nanofluidic devices prompts unconventional ion transports appealing to energy and information technologies, thanks to the susceptibility of confined electric double layers (EDL) to various external physical fields. Although experimental studies advance rapidly, the rationalization of field-tunable nanofluidic transports has not reached a formalized and unified level. Here we formally reformulate the Poisson-Boltzmann theory and reveal distinct EDL regimes on the parameter space. Based on the regime classification, we establish a formal framework for the tunable nanofluidic transport, which reproduces the observed conductivity-concentration scaling behaviors, rationalizes the ionic transistors with reconfigurable polarities, and predicts two fundamental thermodynamic limits for electrostatic modulation (60 mV/dec and 120 mV/dec). Being accurate, generalizable and extensible, this framework can account for a wide range of ion transports in confined spaces.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reformulates the Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) theory for field-tunable nanofluidic devices by classifying distinct electric double layer (EDL) regimes in parameter space. From this classification it constructs a framework claimed to reproduce experimental conductivity-concentration scaling, rationalize ionic transistors with reconfigurable polarities, and predict two thermodynamic limits (60 mV/dec and 120 mV/dec) for electrostatic modulation. The framework is presented as accurate, generalizable, and extensible to a wide range of confined ion-transport phenomena.

Significance. If the regime classification follows rigorously from the PB equations and the mean-field description remains quantitatively accurate under the stated confinement and field conditions, the work would supply a unified theoretical language for field-tunable nanofluidics. Explicit reproduction of observed scalings and falsifiable limits would be useful for device design. The limits, however, coincide with the standard thermal-voltage scales kT/e and 2kT/e, so the added value hinges on whether the reformulation yields them independently rather than by re-expression.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, §3] Abstract and §3 (regime classification): the 60 mV/dec and 120 mV/dec limits are stated as fundamental thermodynamic predictions, yet they are numerically identical to the standard kT/e and 2kT/e values. The manuscript must supply the explicit derivation (starting from the reformulated PB equation) that shows these limits emerge independently rather than by construction from the thermal-voltage definition.
  2. [§4] §4 (framework for tunable transport): the claim that the framework 'reproduces the observed conductivity-concentration scaling behaviors' requires a direct, quantitative comparison with experimental data, including the fitting procedure, any free parameters, and error metrics. If the scaling is recovered only inside the mean-field PB model itself, the reproduction is not an independent prediction.
  3. [§2, §5] §2 and §5 (validity of mean-field PB): the central assumption that the standard PB description remains sufficient in strongly confined, field-tunable EDLs is load-bearing for all claims. The manuscript should provide either (i) explicit bounds on the regime where steric, correlation, or non-equilibrium corrections remain negligible or (ii) a comparison against extended PB models that include those corrections.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§3] Notation for the regime boundaries (e.g., the dimensionless parameters that delineate the EDL regimes) should be defined once in a table or appendix and used consistently; several symbols appear to be introduced without prior definition.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract asserts 'reproduction of experimental scalings' but supplies no figure or table reference; a dedicated comparison figure (or table) with experimental data points and model curves should be added.
  3. [§2] A short discussion of how the framework reduces to classical PB theory in the appropriate limit would improve clarity and help readers assess novelty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and additions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, §3] Abstract and §3 (regime classification): the 60 mV/dec and 120 mV/dec limits are stated as fundamental thermodynamic predictions, yet they are numerically identical to the standard kT/e and 2kT/e values. The manuscript must supply the explicit derivation (starting from the reformulated PB equation) that shows these limits emerge independently rather than by construction from the thermal-voltage definition.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit step-by-step derivation is required. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new subsection in §3 that begins from the reformulated Poisson-Boltzmann equation, introduces the dimensionless confinement and field parameters, performs the asymptotic analysis of the ion-density profiles in each regime, and derives the conductance response. The 60 mV/dec and 120 mV/dec slopes appear as the limiting logarithmic derivatives of the integrated conductance with respect to gate voltage; they are not inserted by hand but follow from the distinct screening regimes identified in the parameter space. We will also note that, while numerically equal to kT/e and 2kT/e, these values correspond to physically distinct mechanisms (bulk-like versus surface-dominated transport) under strong confinement. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (framework for tunable transport): the claim that the framework 'reproduces the observed conductivity-concentration scaling behaviors' requires a direct, quantitative comparison with experimental data, including the fitting procedure, any free parameters, and error metrics. If the scaling is recovered only inside the mean-field PB model itself, the reproduction is not an independent prediction.

    Authors: The scaling exponents are obtained analytically from the regime classification and match the functional forms reported across multiple experimental nanofluidic studies. To strengthen the comparison, the revised §4 will contain a table that (i) cites the specific experimental datasets, (ii) lists the model-predicted exponents together with the extracted experimental values, (iii) specifies the fitting procedure (surface charge density and Debye length as the only adjustable parameters), and (iv) reports quantitative error metrics (mean absolute percentage error). This will make explicit that the agreement is not an internal model consistency check but a direct match to published measurements. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§2, §5] §2 and §5 (validity of mean-field PB): the central assumption that the standard PB description remains sufficient in strongly confined, field-tunable EDLs is load-bearing for all claims. The manuscript should provide either (i) explicit bounds on the regime where steric, correlation, or non-equilibrium corrections remain negligible or (ii) a comparison against extended PB models that include those corrections.

    Authors: We will expand the discussion in §2 to supply explicit validity bounds expressed in terms of the ratio of Debye length to channel height and the dimensionless field strength. These bounds are obtained by estimating the magnitude of the Bikerman steric correction and the ion-coupling parameter; within the stated ranges the corrections remain below 5 %. In §5 we will add a short paragraph comparing the mean-field conductance predictions against results from a steric PB model in the high-concentration limit, confirming that deviations stay within the experimental scatter for the parameter window relevant to field-tunable devices. revision: yes

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Thermodynamic limits are standard kT/e values re-derived inside PB; conductivity scalings reproduced by construction within the same mean-field model

specific steps
  1. renaming known result [Abstract]
    "predicts two fundamental thermodynamic limits for electrostatic modulation (60 mV/dec and 120 mV/dec)"

    60 mV/dec is the standard thermal-voltage Nernstian limit (kT/e * ln(10)) and 120 mV/dec is twice that; both emerge immediately from the exponential Boltzmann term in the original PB equation. No new derivation or external input is required, so the 'prediction' renames a known result inside the PB framework.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Abstract / regime-classification framework]
    "reproduces the observed conductivity-concentration scaling behaviors"

    The reproduction is performed inside the same Poisson-Boltzmann mean-field model whose regime boundaries were just defined from the PB equation. Matching experimental scalings is therefore a direct consequence of the model's assumptions rather than an independent prediction.

full rationale

The paper reformulates standard Poisson-Boltzmann theory, classifies EDL regimes on its parameter space, and then claims to 'predict' the 60 mV/dec and 120 mV/dec limits plus reproduce conductivity-concentration scalings. These limits are exactly the Nernstian slope (≈2.3 kT/e) and twice that, which follow directly from the Boltzmann factor already present in the PB equation. The reproduction of observed scalings occurs inside the identical mean-field framework used for regime classification, so it is statistically forced rather than an independent first-principles result. The central framework therefore organizes and renames known PB consequences without introducing new external constraints or falsifiable content beyond the input assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard mean-field Poisson-Boltzmann description of electrolytes together with the assumption that external fields act only through boundary conditions on the electrostatic potential; no new entities are introduced and no free parameters are explicitly fitted in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Poisson-Boltzmann equation in the mean-field approximation accurately captures the equilibrium structure of the electric double layer in confined geometries
    This is the foundational equation being reformulated; invoked throughout the regime classification.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5460 in / 1499 out tokens · 80543 ms · 2026-05-10T10:16:40.527750+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    order parameters

    yield accurate PB solutions over the entire parameter space (γandχ). We define a set of “order parameters”: δ(Ω ent,Ω ele) = Ωent −Ω ele Ωent + Ωele , δ(n D, nE) = nD −n E nD +n E ,Λ = nD −n E nD +n E + 2n0 .(8) 3 Zone Z3 Z4 Z0 Z1 Z2 EDL feature EDLs overlap (γ <1, γχ <1) Linear response (γ >1, χ <1) Surface accumulation (χ >1, γχ >1) Characteristic lengt...

    work page

  2. [2]

    plotted, yielding the regime diagram in Fig. 2(b). The four dividing lines partition the parameter plane into five zones (Z0 toZ 4) and are summarized in Table. I . Inspired by regime-classification, regime-specific heuristic forms are derived for surface potential Φs and for relative excess ion concentration Γ = (n D +n E)/2n0: Φs = ( 2χ tanh 2γ , Z 0; 2...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Next consider finiteη g and adopt sub- threshold swing (SS) from electronic transistors, defined as SS = dφ g/d(logG)

    Hence, despite the lack of quantum-mechanical band alignment effects as in electronic transistors, satisfying ionic switching performances can still be obtained via nanoconfinement. Next consider finiteη g and adopt sub- threshold swing (SS) from electronic transistors, defined as SS = dφ g/d(logG). Due to the dielectric coupling, 5 FIG. 4. Transistor beh...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Bocquet and E

    L. Bocquet and E. Charlaix, Nanofluidics, from bulk to interfaces, Chem. Soc. Rev.39, 1073 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    R. B. Schoch, J. Han, and P. Renaud, Transport phe- nomena in nanofluidics, Reviews of Modern Physics80, 839 (2008)

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    Liu, X.-Y

    P. Liu, X.-Y. Kong, L. Jiang, and L. Wen, Ion transport in nanofluidics under external fields, Chemical Society Reviews53, 2972 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    P. Peng, Z. Wang, and D. Wei, Modulating multi-ion dy- namics for high-performance iontronic systems, Iontron- ics2, 5 (2026)

    work page 2026

  8. [8]

    W. Guan, R. Fan, and M. A. Reed, Field-effect reconfig- urable nanofluidic ionic diodes, Nature Communications 2, 506 (2011)

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Coronado, R

    R. Coronado, R. L. Rosenberg, and C. Miller, Ionic se- lectivity, saturation, and block in a K+-selective chan- nel from sarcoplasmic reticulum., The Journal of general physiology76, 425 (1980)

    work page 1980

  10. [10]

    Pandey, S

    D. Pandey, S. Bhattacharyya, and S. Ghosal, Charge Selectivity of an Ionic Transistor, Langmuir37, 4571 (2021)

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    H. Li, J. S. Francisco, and X. C. Zeng, Unraveling the mechanism of selective ion transport in hydropho- bic subnanometer channels, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112, 10851 (2015)

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Karnik, C

    R. Karnik, C. Duan, K. Castelino, H. Daiguji, and A. Ma- jumdar, Rectification of Ionic Current in a Nanofluidic Diode, Nano Letters7, 547 (2007)

    work page 2007

  13. [13]

    G. Cui, Z. Xu, H. Li, S. Zhang, L. Xu, A. Siria, and M. Ma, Enhanced osmotic transport in individual double- walled carbon nanotube, Nature Communications14, 2295 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Karnik, R

    R. Karnik, R. Fan, M. Yue, D. Li, P. Yang, and A. Ma- jumdar, Electrostatic Control of Ions and Molecules in Nanofluidic Transistors, Nano Letters5, 943 (2005)

    work page 2005

  15. [15]

    Y.-C. Yao, A. Taqieddin, M. A. Alibakhshi, M. Wanunu, N. R. Aluru, and A. Noy, Strong Electroosmotic Coupling Dominates Ion Conductance of 1.5 nm Diameter Carbon Nanotube Porins, ACS Nano13, 12851 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Marcotte, T

    A. Marcotte, T. Mouterde, A. Nigu` es, A. Siria, and L. Bocquet, Mechanically activated ionic transport across single-digit carbon nanotubes, Nature Materials19, 1057 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    K. Xiao, L. Chen, R. Chen, T. Heil, S. D. C. Lemus, F. Fan, L. Wen, L. Jiang, and M. Antonietti, Artificial light-driven ion pump for photoelectric energy conver- sion, Nature Communications10, 74 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Zheng, J

    X. Zheng, J. Wang, J. Jiang, T. Zhang, J. Zhu, T. Dang, P. Wu, A.-Y. Lu, D.-R. Chen, T. H. Yang, X. Zhang, K. Zhang, K. Y. Ma, Z. Wang, A. Yao, H. Liu, Y. Wan, Y.-P. Hsieh, V. Bulovi´ c, T. Palacios, and J. Kong, Electrostatic-repulsion-based transfer of van der Waals materials, Nature645, 906 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Kavokine, M.-L

    N. Kavokine, M.-L. Bocquet, and L. Bocquet, Fluctuation-induced quantum friction in nanoscale water flows, Nature602, 84 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    R. Fan, M. Yue, R. Karnik, A. Majumdar, and P. Yang, Polarity Switching and Transient Responses in Single Nanotube Nanofluidic Transistors, Physical Review Let- ters95, 086607 (2005)

    work page 2005

  21. [21]

    T. Mei, W. Liu, G. Xu, Y. Chen, M. Wu, L. Wang, and K. Xiao, Ionic Transistors, ACS Nano18, 4624 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Q. Chen, Z. Cao, H. Zhao, Y. Deng, X. Peng, Z. Ding, G. Zhang, L. Yu, Y. Wang, B. Tu, and Y. Xue, Elec- trostatically Gated Trilayer Graphene Nanopore as an Ultrathin Rectifying Ion Filter, ACS Nano19, 21589 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Zhang, L

    Z. Zhang, L. Wen, and L. Jiang, Nanofluidics for os- motic energy conversion, Nature Reviews Materials6, 622 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    C. Yao, G. Li, H. Zeng, C. Wu, J. Zhou, and J. Wang, Nanofluidic osmotic energy devices based on metal–organic frameworks, Materials Science and Engi- neering: B313, 117931 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Chanakul, N

    W. Chanakul, N. Chantipmanee, M. Sandell, R. An, M. Mayer, and Y. Xu, Nanopore sensing: current progress and future challenges tackled by nanofluidic de- vices, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry194, 118541 (2026)

    work page 2026

  26. [26]

    Stein, M

    D. Stein, M. Kruithof, and C. Dekker, Surface-Charge- Governed Ion Transport in Nanofluidic Channels, Phys- ical Review Letters93, 035901 (2004)

    work page 2004

  27. [27]

    H. Liu, J. He, J. Tang, H. Liu, P. Pang, D. Cao, P. Krstic, S. Joseph, S. Lindsay, and C. Nuckolls, Translocation of Single-Stranded DNA Through Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes, Science327, 64 (2010)

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    Secchi, A

    E. Secchi, A. Nigu` es, L. Jubin, A. Siria, and L. Bocquet, Scaling Behavior for Ionic Transport and its Fluctuations in Individual Carbon Nanotubes, Physical Review Let- ters116, 154501 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Emmerich, K

    T. Emmerich, K. S. Vasu, A. Nigu` es, A. Keerthi, B. Radha, A. Siria, and L. Bocquet, Enhanced nanoflu- idic transport in activated carbon nanoconduits, Nature Materials21, 696 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Wu, Understanding the Electric Double-Layer Struc- ture, Capacitance, and Charging Dynamics, Chemical Reviews122, 10821 (2022)

    J. Wu, Understanding the Electric Double-Layer Struc- ture, Capacitance, and Charging Dynamics, Chemical Reviews122, 10821 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    A. J. Bard and L. R. Faulkner,Electrochemical meth- ods: fundamentals and applications, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 2001)

    work page 2001

  32. [32]

    Gouy, Sur la constitution de la charge ´ electrique ` a la surface d’un ´ electrolyte, Journal de Physique Th´ eorique et Appliqu´ ee9, 457 (1910)

    M. Gouy, Sur la constitution de la charge ´ electrique ` a la surface d’un ´ electrolyte, Journal de Physique Th´ eorique et Appliqu´ ee9, 457 (1910)

    work page 1910

  33. [33]

    Wu, ed.,Variational Methods in Molecular Modeling, Molecular Modeling and Simulation (Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2017)

    J. Wu, ed.,Variational Methods in Molecular Modeling, Molecular Modeling and Simulation (Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2017)

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    D. L. Chapman, A contribution to the theory of electro- capillarity, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philo- sophical Magazine and Journal of Science25, 475 (1913)

    work page 1913

  35. [35]

    Philipse and A

    A. Philipse and A. Vrij, The Donnan equilibrium: I. 7 On the thermodynamic foundation of the Donnan equa- tion of state, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter23, 194106 (2011)

    work page 2011

  36. [36]

    Mouterde and L

    T. Mouterde and L. Bocquet, Interfacial transport with mobile surface charges and consequences for ionic trans- port in carbon nanotubes, The European Physical Jour- nal E41, 148 (2018)

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    P. M. Biesheuvel and M. Z. Bazant, Analysis of ionic conductance of carbon nanotubes, Physical Review E94, 050601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Jin and N

    X. Jin and N. R. Aluru, Gated transport in nanofluidic devices, Microfluidics and Nanofluidics11, 297 (2011)

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    Kavokine, R

    N. Kavokine, R. R. Netz, and L. Bocquet, Fluids at the Nanoscale: From Continuum to Subcontinuum Trans- port, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics53, 377 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    H¨ uckel, Zur Theorie der Elektrolyte, inErgebnisse der exakten naturwissenschaften, Vol

    E. H¨ uckel, Zur Theorie der Elektrolyte, inErgebnisse der exakten naturwissenschaften, Vol. 3 (Springer Berlin Hei- delberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1924) pp. 199–276

    work page 1924

  41. [41]

    G. M. Silva, X. Liang, and G. M. Kontogeorgis, On the derivations of the Debye–H¨ uckel equations, Molec- ular Physics120, e2064353 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    X. Zhu, D. Li, X. Liang, and W. D. Lu, Ionic modulation and ionic coupling effects in MoS2 devices for neuromor- phic computing, Nature Materials18, 141 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    J. N. Israelachvili,Intermolecular and surface forces, 3rd ed. (Academic Press, Burlington, MA, 2011)

    work page 2011

  44. [44]

    J. Yang, H. Su, C. Lian, Y. Shang, H. Liu, and J. Wu, Un- derstanding surface charge regulation in silica nanopores, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics22, 15373 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    P. Pang, J. He, J. H. Park, P. S. Krsti´ c, and S. Lind- say, Origin of Giant Ionic Currents in Carbon Nanotube Channels, ACS Nano5, 7277 (2011)

    work page 2011

  46. [46]

    Kavokine, S

    N. Kavokine, S. Marbach, A. Siria, and L. Bocquet, Ionic Coulomb blockade as a fractional Wien effect, Nature Nanotechnology14, 573 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Esfandiar, B

    A. Esfandiar, B. Radha, F. C. Wang, Q. Yang, S. Hu, S. Garaj, R. R. Nair, A. K. Geim, and K. Gopinadhan, Size effect in ion transport through angstrom-scale slits, Science358, 511 (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    Y. Xue, Y. Xia, S. Yang, Y. Alsaid, K. Y. Fong, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Atomic-scale ion transistor with ultrahigh diffusivity, Science372, 501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    Robin, N

    P. Robin, N. Kavokine, and L. Bocquet, Modeling of emergent memory and voltage spiking in ionic transport through angstrom-scale slits, Science373, 687 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Zhang, Y

    N. Zhang, Y. He, and L. Wang, Designing iontronic pres- sure sensors: a perspective from multiscale mechanics, Iontronics1, 5 (2025)

    work page 2025