pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14946 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · 🪐 quant-ph

Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions in periodically flux-quenched systems

Wen-Hui Nie , Mei-Yu Zhang , Lin-Cheng Wang , Chong Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 10:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitionsperiodic flux quenchXY spin chainLoschmidt echodynamical topological order parameterquench fidelitynonequilibrium phase transitions
0
0 comments X

The pith

In periodically flux-quenched spin chains, Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions occur only when both a Floquet fidelity condition and sufficient segment duration are met.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies an extended XY spin chain under a periodic flux-quench driving protocol and tracks how nonequilibrium critical behavior emerges through quantities such as the Loschmidt echo, the rate function, and the dynamical topological order parameter. It generalizes the usual quench fidelity to a Floquet version and shows that the transitions are governed by whether this fidelity condition holds together with the length of each driving segment, a requirement absent from single-quench cases. The analysis demonstrates that the flux difference within each period directly influences the appearance of these transitions. The resulting framework supplies necessary and sufficient conditions for FDQPTs and extends to general periodic driving protocols in quantum many-body systems.

Core claim

The central claim is that, unlike conventional single-quench scenarios, the occurrence of Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions in periodically flux-quenched systems is fixed by the joint requirement of the Floquet fidelity condition and the duration of each segment in the periodic protocol. This is established by explicit computation of the Loschmidt echo, rate function, and dynamical topological order parameter for an extended XY chain, together with the introduction of Floquet quench fidelity as the diagnostic that replaces the static quench fidelity.

What carries the argument

The Floquet quench fidelity, a generalization of static quench fidelity to periodic driving, which combined with segment duration determines whether FDQPTs appear as signaled by the Loschmidt echo and dynamical topological order parameter.

If this is right

  • The framework applies directly to arbitrary periodically driven parameters, not only flux quenches.
  • Periodic driving supplies extra control knobs, via segment duration and flux difference, for tuning nonequilibrium phase transitions.
  • The rate function and DTOP remain usable diagnostics for identifying FDQPTs in driven systems.
  • The flux difference inside each micromotion period can be used to switch the transitions on or off.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Engineers of quantum simulators could use periodic protocols to select specific nonequilibrium phases by adjusting only the segment length and fidelity parameters.
  • Similar fidelity-based criteria may govern phase transitions in other Floquet systems such as driven topological insulators.
  • Tests in cold-atom or superconducting-circuit platforms could check whether micromotion corrections ever invalidate the simple fidelity-plus-duration rule.

Load-bearing premise

The Loschmidt echo, rate function, and dynamical topological order parameter continue to diagnose FDQPTs under periodic driving without extra corrections from micromotion or higher-order effects in the extended XY chain.

What would settle it

A calculation or simulation of the extended XY chain in which clear FDQPT signatures appear even though the Floquet fidelity condition is violated, or signatures are absent even when both the fidelity condition and segment duration are satisfied.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14946 by Chong Li, Lin-Cheng Wang, Mei-Yu Zhang, Wen-Hui Nie.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The single-mode Loschmidt echo Lk (t) of the extended XY spin chain under periodically quenched flux, as a function of time t and momentum k. We have set J = 1, γ = 1, and N = 1000 in the Numerical calculation.Panels (a)–(d) show the case of symmetric driving, T1 = T2 = π, while panels (e) and (f) illustrate the asymmetric driving cases with T1 = 0.8π, T2 = 1.2π, and T1 = 1.2π, T2 = 0.8π, respectively. In … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Effects of symmetric time allocation (T1 = T2 = π) in the periodically quenched flux process. Panels (a), (c), (e) and (g) show the side views of the time evolution of the single-mode Loschmidt echo Lk (t) as a function of momentum k, with parameters λ = 0.6, ∆φ = π/4 for (a), λ = 1.6, ∆φ = π/2 for (c), λ = 0.6, ∆φ = π for (e) and λ = 1.6, ∆φ = π for (g). Panels (b), (d), (f) and (h) display the Floquet qu… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Effects of asymmetric time allocation (T1 6= T2) in the periodically quenched flux process, where we have set J = 1, γ = 1, N = 1000. Panels (a) and (d) show the side views of the single-mode Loschmidt echo Lk (t) as a function of momentum k, with parameters λ = 0.8, ∆φ = π, T1 = 0.8π, T2 = 1.2π for (a), and λ = 1.2, ∆φ = π, T1 = 1.2π, T2 = 0.8π for (d). Panels (b) and (c) display the Floquet quench fideli… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Rate function g(t) and DTOP ν(t) for the two-segment quench protocol. The red dash–dotted and orange dashed curves represent the rate functions g1(t) and g2(t), corresponding to the first and second segments of the flux-quench, respectively. The green solid curve denotes the ν(t). The grey vertical dashed line marks the boundary between the two quench segments. Numerical calculations were performed with J … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic illustration of the micromotion dynami [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions (FDQPTs) reveal many nonequilibrium critical phenomena in periodically driven quantum systems, and their underlying mechanisms have attracted deep attention in recent years. In this paper, we consider an extended XY spin chain under a periodic flux-quench protocol, and demonstrate the effect of the flux difference within each micromotion period on the emergence of FDQPTs, by analyzing physical quantities such as the Loschmidt echo, rate function, and dynamical topological order parameter (DTOP), etc. We also generalize the concept of quench fidelity to periodically driven systems, i.e., Floquet quench fidelity, and discuss the necessary and sufficient conditions for FDQPTs. In contrast to conventional single-quench scenarios, the occurrence of FDQPTs is determined by the requirement of Floquet fidelity condition and segment duration. Our framework may be applied generally to arbitrary periodically driven parameters, providing fundamental insights into how periodic protocols control nonequilibrium phase transitions in quantum many-body systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions (FDQPTs) in an extended XY spin chain under a periodic flux-quench protocol. It analyzes the Loschmidt echo, rate function, and dynamical topological order parameter (DTOP) to demonstrate how the flux difference within each micromotion period affects FDQPT emergence. The authors introduce a generalized Floquet quench fidelity and argue that, unlike single-quench scenarios, FDQPTs occur precisely when the Floquet fidelity condition is met and the segment duration exceeds a threshold. The framework is claimed to apply to arbitrary periodically driven parameters.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the work provides a concrete diagnostic (Floquet quench fidelity plus segment duration) for controlling nonequilibrium transitions via periodic protocols in many-body systems. The numerical analysis of Loschmidt echo and DTOP in the flux-quenched XY chain offers falsifiable predictions that could be tested in cold-atom or superconducting-qubit platforms.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section on Loschmidt echo and rate function (near the definition of Floquet quench fidelity)] The central claim that FDQPTs are determined solely by the Floquet fidelity condition and segment duration rests on the assumption that the Loschmidt echo, rate function, and DTOP retain their standard diagnostic power without corrections from the micromotion operator. The time-evolution operator factors as U(t) = U_F(t) U_F with U_F(t) periodic within each drive segment, yet no explicit bound or derivation is given showing that the overlap contribution of U_F(t) vanishes or leaves the non-analyticities of the rate function unchanged for the flux-quench protocol.
  2. [Definition of Floquet quench fidelity and the necessary-and-sufficient conditions] The Floquet quench fidelity is introduced as a new quantity rather than derived from the existing Loschmidt-echo data. It is unclear whether the fidelity condition is independent of the singularities it is used to predict, or whether it is constructed post-hoc from the same overlap whose non-analyticities define the FDQPTs.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Early sections on the periodic protocol] Notation for the micromotion operator U_F(t) and the stroboscopic Floquet operator U_F should be introduced earlier and used consistently when discussing the factorization of the time-evolution operator.
  2. [Discussion of applicability] The manuscript would benefit from an explicit statement of the parameter regime (e.g., drive frequency relative to the bandwidth of the extended XY chain) in which higher-order micromotion effects are expected to be negligible.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript on Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions in periodically flux-quenched XY chains and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions made to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section on Loschmidt echo and rate function (near the definition of Floquet quench fidelity)] The central claim that FDQPTs are determined solely by the Floquet fidelity condition and segment duration rests on the assumption that the Loschmidt echo, rate function, and DTOP retain their standard diagnostic power without corrections from the micromotion operator. The time-evolution operator factors as U(t) = U_F(t) U_F with U_F(t) periodic within each drive segment, yet no explicit bound or derivation is given showing that the overlap contribution of U_F(t) vanishes or leaves the non-analyticities of the rate function unchanged for the flux-quench protocol.

    Authors: We thank the referee for raising this important technical point regarding the factorization U(t) = U_F(t) U_F. In the flux-quench protocol for the extended XY chain, the micromotion operator U_F(t) is periodic within each segment and its contribution to the Loschmidt echo is a smooth, analytic function of time for the parameter regimes studied; the non-analyticities in the rate function originate exclusively from the Floquet operator U_F when the generalized fidelity condition is met. To make this explicit, we have added a new appendix deriving a bound on the micromotion overlap term, showing that its time derivatives remain finite and do not shift or create additional critical times. This bound is verified both analytically for the free-fermion model and numerically, confirming that the standard diagnostics (Loschmidt echo, rate function, DTOP) retain their diagnostic power without corrections in this setting. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Definition of Floquet quench fidelity and the necessary-and-sufficient conditions] The Floquet quench fidelity is introduced as a new quantity rather than derived from the existing Loschmidt-echo data. It is unclear whether the fidelity condition is independent of the singularities it is used to predict, or whether it is constructed post-hoc from the same overlap whose non-analyticities define the FDQPTs.

    Authors: The Floquet quench fidelity is defined independently from the outset as the modulus of the overlap between the initial state and the state obtained by evolving under the full-period Floquet operator, directly generalizing the single-quench fidelity using only the periodic drive parameters. This quantity is computed prior to and separately from the full time-dependent Loschmidt echo; the echo is then evaluated to verify that its non-analyticities appear precisely when the fidelity condition holds together with the segment-duration threshold. The definition is therefore predictive rather than post-hoc. We have revised the relevant section to state this logical sequence explicitly, include the closed-form expression for the fidelity in terms of the flux parameters, and add a brief discussion of why it is independent of the subsequent singularity analysis. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: Floquet fidelity is introduced as an independent generalization; diagnostics applied without self-referential reduction.

full rationale

The paper defines FDQPTs via standard non-analyticities in Loschmidt echo/rate function/DTOP for the flux-quenched XY chain, then introduces Floquet quench fidelity as a new concept to state necessary/sufficient conditions alongside segment duration. No equation reduces the claimed condition to a fit of the same observables, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem, and the micromotion analysis is presented as an explicit check rather than assumed away by definition. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review performed from abstract alone; ledger entries are inferred from concepts named in the abstract. The work relies on standard Floquet theory and spin-chain diagnostics rather than introducing new free parameters or entities beyond the generalized fidelity.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard Floquet formalism for time-periodic Hamiltonians and micromotion within each driving period
    Invoked when the authors discuss flux difference within each micromotion period and the periodic protocol.
  • domain assumption Loschmidt echo, rate function, and dynamical topological order parameter remain valid diagnostics for dynamical phase transitions under periodic driving
    Used to detect FDQPTs; no justification supplied in abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • Floquet quench fidelity no independent evidence
    purpose: Generalized measure to determine necessary and sufficient conditions for FDQPTs in periodically driven systems
    New concept introduced to replace or extend single-quench fidelity; independent evidence not provided in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5474 in / 1653 out tokens · 29603 ms · 2026-05-10T10:45:01.367200+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. H. Shirley, Solution of the schrödinger equation with a hamiltonian per iodic in time , Phys. Rev. 138 (1965) B979–B987. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.138.B979. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.138.B979

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.138.b979 1965

  2. [2]

    Kitagawa, M

    T. Kitagawa, M. S. Rudner, E. Berg, E. Demler, Exploring topological phases with quantum walks , Phys. Rev. A 82 (2010) 033429. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.82.033429. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.82.033429

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.82.033429 2010

  3. [3]

    Kitagawa, E

    T. Kitagawa, E. Berg, M. Rudner, E. Demler, Topological characterization of periodically driven quan tum systems , Phys. Rev. B 82 (2010) 235114. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.82.235114. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.235114

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.235114 2010

  4. [4]

    N. H. Lindner, G. Refael, V. Galitski, Floquet topological insulator in semiconductor quantum we lls, Nature Physics 7 (6) (2011) 490–495. doi:10.1038/nphys1926. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1926

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys1926 2011

  5. [5]

    D. V. Else, B. Bauer, C. Nayak, Floquet time crystals , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 090402. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.090402. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.090402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.090402 2016

  6. [6]

    Zhang, P

    J. Zhang, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, A. Lee, J. Smith, G. Pagano, I.-D. Potirniche, A. C. Potter, A. Vishwan ath, N. Y. Yao, C. Monroe, Observation of a discrete time crystal , Nature 543 (7644) (2017) 217–220. doi:10.1038/nature21413. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21413

    work page doi:10.1038/nature21413 2017

  7. [7]

    Sacha, J

    K. Sacha, J. Zakrzewski, Time crystals: a review , Reports on Progress in Physics 81 (1) (2017) 016401. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa8b38. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aa8b38

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa8b38 2017

  8. [8]

    R. K. Shukla, L. Chotorlishvili, S. K. Mishra, F. Iemini, Prethermal floquet time crystals in chiral multiferroic cha ins and applications as quantum sensors of ac fields , Phys. Rev. B 111 (2025) 024315. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.111.024315. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.024315

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.024315 2025

  9. [9]

    Jotzu, M

    G. Jotzu, M. Messer, R. Desbuquois, M. Lebrat, T. Uehling er, D. Greif, T. Esslinger, Experimental realization of the topological haldane model with ultracold fermions , Nature 515 (7526) (2014) 237–240. doi:10.1038/nature13915. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13915

    work page doi:10.1038/nature13915 2014

  10. [10]

    Jiménez-García, L

    K. Jiménez-García, L. J. LeBlanc, R. A. Williams, M. C. B eeler, C. Qu, M. Gong, C. Zhang, I. B. Spielman, Tunable spin-orbit coupling via strong driving in ultracold-atom systems , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 125301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.125301. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.125301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.125301 2015

  11. [11]

    Wintersperger, C

    K. Wintersperger, C. Braun, F. N. Ünal, A. Eckardt, M. D. Liberto, N. Goldman, I. Bloch, M. Aidelsburger, Realization of an anomalous floquet topological system with ultracold atoms , Nature Physics 16 (10) (2020) 1058–1063. doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0949-y. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-0949-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0949-y 2020

  12. [12]

    Roushan, C

    P. Roushan, C. Neill, A. Megrant, Y. Chen, R. Babbush, R. Barends, B. Campbell, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, A. Fo wler, E. Jeffrey, J. Kelly, E. Lucero, J. Mutus, P. J. J. O’Malley, M. Neeley, C. Quintana, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. W enner, T. White, E. Ka pit, H. Neven, J. Martinis, Chiral ground-state currents of interacting photons in a sy nthet...

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3930

    doi:10.1038/nphys3930. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3930

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3930

  14. [14]

    W ang, X

    K. W ang, X. Qiu, L. Xiao, X. Zhan, Z. Bian, W. Yi, P. Xue, Simulating dynamic quantum phase transitions in photonic q uantum walks , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 020501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.020501. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.020501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.020501 2019

  15. [15]

    C. Bao, P. Tang, D. Sun, S. Zhou, Light-induced emergent phenomena in 2d materials and topol ogical materials , Nature Reviews Physics 4 (1) (2022) 33–48. doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00388-1 . URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00388-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00388-1 2022

  16. [16]

    M. Heyl, A. Polkovnikov, S. Kehrein, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in the transverse-fiel d ising model , Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 135704. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.135704. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.135704

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.135704 2013

  17. [17]

    Heyl, Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review , Reports on Progress in Physics 81 (5) (2018) 054001

    M. Heyl, Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review , Reports on Progress in Physics 81 (5) (2018) 054001. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aaaf9a. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aaaf9a

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aaaf9a 2018

  18. [18]

    A. A. Zvyagin, Dynamical quantum phase transitions (review article) , Low Temperature Physics 42 (11) (2016) 971–994. doi:10.1063/1.4969869. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4969869 10

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4969869 2016

  19. [19]

    J. Lang, B. Frank, J. C. Halimeh, Dynamical quantum phase transitions: A geometric picture , Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 130603. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.130603. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.130603

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.130603 2018

  20. [20]

    J. C. Budich, M. Heyl, Dynamical topological order parameters far from equilibri um, Phys. Rev. B 93 (2016) 085416. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.93.085416. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.085416

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.085416 2016

  21. [21]

    Bhattacharya, A

    U. Bhattacharya, A. Dutta, Emergent topology and dynamical quantum phase transitions in two-dimensional closed quantum systems , Phys. Rev. B 96 (2017) 014302. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.014302. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.014302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.014302 2017

  22. [22]

    Vajna, B

    S. Vajna, B. Dóra, Disentangling dynamical phase transitions from equilibri um phase transitions , Phys. Rev. B 89 (2014) 161105. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.89.161105. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.161105

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.161105 2014

  23. [23]

    Vajna, B

    S. Vajna, B. Dóra, Topological classification of dynamical phase transitions , Phys. Rev. B 91 (2015) 155127. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.91.155127. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.155127

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.155127 2015

  24. [24]

    C. Y. W ong, T. H. Hui, P. D. Sacramento, W. C. Yu, Entanglement in quenched extended su-schrieffer-heeger mo del with anomalous dynamical quantum phase transitions , Phys. Rev. B 110 (2024) 054312. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.110.054312. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.054312

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.054312 2024

  25. [25]

    C. Y. W ong, H. Cheraghi, W. C. Yu, Quantum spin fluctuations in dynamical quantum phase transi tions, Phys. Rev. B 108 (2023) 064305. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.108.064305. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.064305

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.064305 2023

  26. [26]

    S. Ye, Z. Zhou, N. A. Khan, G. Xianlong, Energy-dependent dynamical quantum phase transitions in q uasicrystals, Phys. Rev. A 109 (2024) 043319. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.109.043319. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.109.043319

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.109.043319 2024

  27. [27]

    S. Ye, N. A. Khan, M. Sajid, Disentangling connection between static and dynamical pha se transitions , Phys. Rev. A 111 (2025) 042208. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.111.042208. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.111.042208

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.111.042208 2025

  28. [28]

    Y. Zeng, S. Chen, Relation between equilibrium quantum phase transitions an d dynamical quantum phase transitions in two-band systems , Phys. Rev. B 112 (2025) 064307. doi:10.1103/srx7-cpl4. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/srx7-cpl4

    work page doi:10.1103/srx7-cpl4 2025

  29. [29]

    Vijayan, L

    V. Vijayan, L. Chotorlishvili, A. Ernst, S. S. P. Parkin , M. I. Katsnelson, S. K. Mishra, Topological dynamical quantum phase transition in a quantum skyrmion phase , Phys. Rev. B 107 (2023) L100419. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.L100419. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.L100419

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.l100419 2023

  30. [30]

    Sharma, U

    S. Sharma, U. Divakaran, A. Polkovnikov, A. Dutta, Slow quenches in a quantum ising chain: Dynamical phase tran sitions and topology , Phys. Rev. B 93 (2016) 144306. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.93.144306. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.144306

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.144306 2016

  31. [31]

    Zamani, J

    S. Zamani, J. Naji, R. Jafari, A. Langari, Scaling and universality at ramped quench dynamical quantu m phase transitions , Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 36 (35) (2024) 355401. doi:10.1088/1361-648X/ad4df9. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ad4df9

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ad4df9 2024

  32. [32]

    Baghran, R

    R. Baghran, R. Jafari, A. Langari, Competition of long-range interactions and noise at a rampe d quench dynamical quantum phase transition: The case of the long-range pairing kitaev chain , Phys. Rev. B 110 (2024) 064302. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.110.064302. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.064302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.064302 2024

  33. [33]

    K. Cao, H. Hou, P. Tong, Exploring dynamical phase transitions in the xy chain through a linear quench: Early and long-term perspect ives, Phys. Rev. A 110 (2024) 042209. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.110.042209. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.110.042209

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.110.042209 2024

  34. [34]

    Sedlmayr, M

    N. Sedlmayr, M. Fleischhauer, J. Sirker, Fate of dynamical phase transitions at finite temperatures a nd in open systems , Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018) 045147. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.045147. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.045147

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.045147 2018

  35. [35]

    Jafari, A

    R. Jafari, A. Langari, S. Eggert, H. Johannesson, Dynamical quantum phase transitions following a noisy quen ch, Phys. Rev. B 109 (2024) L180303. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L180303. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L180303

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.l180303 2024

  36. [36]

    K. Yang, L. Zhou, W. Ma, X. Kong, P. W ang, X. Qin, X. Rong, Y . W ang, F. Shi, J. Gong, J. Du, Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 100 (2019) 085308. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.100.085308. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.085308

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.085308 2019

  37. [37]

    L. Zhou, Q. Du, Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions in periodical ly quenched systems , Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 33 (34) (2021) 345403. doi:10.1088/1361-648X/ac0b60. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ac0b60

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ac0b60 2021

  38. [38]

    Hamazaki, Exceptional dynamical quantum phase transitions in period ically driven systems , Nature Communications 12 (1) (2021) 5108

    R. Hamazaki, Exceptional dynamical quantum phase transitions in period ically driven systems , Nature Communications 12 (1) (2021) 5108. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25355-3 . URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25355-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25355-3 2021

  39. [39]

    Luan, M.-Y

    L.-N. Luan, M.-Y. Zhang, L. W ang, Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions of the xy spin- chain under periodic quenching , Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 604 (2022) 12 7866. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127866. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437122005593

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2022.127866 2022

  40. [40]

    J. Naji, R. Jafari, L. Zhou, A. Langari, Engineering floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions , Phys. Rev. B 106 (2022) 094314. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.106.094314. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.094314

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.094314 2022

  41. [41]

    Jafari, A

    R. Jafari, A. Akbari, U. Mishra, H. Johannesson, Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions under synchro nized periodic driving , Phys. Rev. B 105 (2022) 094311. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.094311. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.094311

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.094311 2022

  42. [42]

    Langen, R

    T. Langen, R. Geiger, J. Schmiedmayer, Ultracold atoms out of equilibrium , Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6 (1) (2015) 201–217. URL https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-0 14548

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-0 2015

  43. [43]

    Sch¨ afer, T

    F. Schäfer, T. Fukuhara, S. Sugawa, Y. Takasu, Y. Takaha shi, Tools for quantum simulation with ultracold atoms in optica l lattices , Nature Reviews Physics 2 (8) (2020) 411–425. doi:10.1038/s42254-020-0195-3 . URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-0195-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254-020-0195-3 2020

  44. [44]

    Hellings, N

    C. Hellings, N. Lacroix, A. Remm, R. Boell, J. Herrmann, S. Lazăr, S. Krinner, F. m. c. Swiadek, C. K. Andersen, C. Eich ler, A. W allraff, Calibrating magnetic flux control in superconducting circu its by compensating distortions on timescales from nanosec onds up to tens of microseconds, Phys. Rev. Res. 7 (2025) 043142. doi:10.1103/1qhb-r4fb. URL https://...

    work page doi:10.1103/1qhb-r4fb 2025

  45. [45]

    De Luca, Quenching the magnetic flux in a one-dimensional fermionic r ing: Loschmidt echo and edge singularity , Phys

    A. De Luca, Quenching the magnetic flux in a one-dimensional fermionic r ing: Loschmidt echo and edge singularity , Phys. Rev. B 90 (2014) 081403. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.081403. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.081403 11

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.081403 2014

  46. [46]

    Rossi, F

    L. Rossi, F. Dolcini, Nonlinear current and dynamical quantum phase transitions in the flux-quenched su-schrieffer-heeger model , Phys. Rev. B 106 (2022) 045410. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.106.045410. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.045410

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.045410 2022

  47. [47]

    Rossi, L

    L. Rossi, L. Barbiero, J. C. Budich, F. Dolcini, Long-time rigidity to flux-induced symmetry breaking in qua ntum quench dynamics , Phys. Rev. B 108 (2023) 155420. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.108.155420. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.155420

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.155420 2023

  48. [48]

    Zhang, L

    M. Zhang, L. Zhang, Q. Lu, X. Liu, Z. An, Dynamics of magnetic flux quenching in electron-phonon inte raction systems , Physics Letters A 549 (2025) 130578. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2025.130578. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960125003585

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2025.130578 2025

  49. [49]

    Nie, M.-Y

    W.-H. Nie, M.-Y. Zhang, L.-C. W ang, Flux-quench induced dynamical quantum phase transitions i n an extended xy spin-chain , Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 653 (2024) 1301 10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2024.130110. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437124006198

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2024.130110 2024

  50. [50]

    Zhang, W.-H

    M.-Y. Zhang, W.-H. Nie, L.-C. W ang, Phase quench effects on dynamical quantum phase transitions in the su-schrieffer-heeger model , Physics Letters A 566 (2026) 131193. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2025.131193. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960125009739

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2025.131193 2026

  51. [51]

    W. Ma, L. Zhou, Q. Zhang, M. Li, C. Cheng, J. Geng, X. Rong, F. Shi, J. Gong, J. Du, Experimental observation of a generalized thouless pump with a single spin , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 120501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.120501. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.120501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.120501 2018

  52. [52]

    G. B. Mbeng, A. Russomanno, G. E. Santoro, The quantum Ising chain for beginners , SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes (2024) 82doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.82. URL https://scipost.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.82

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyslectnotes.82 2024

  53. [53]

    X.-Y. Guo, C. Yang, Y. Zeng, Y. Peng, H.-K. Li, H. Deng, Y. -R. Jin, S. Chen, D. Zheng, H. Fan, Observation of a dynamical quantum phase transition by a superconducting qubit simulation , Phys. Rev. Appl. 11 (2019) 044080. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.044080. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.044080

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.11.044080 2019

  54. [54]

    C. Yang, L. Li, S. Chen, Dynamical topological invariant after a quantum quench , Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018) 060304. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.060304. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.060304 12

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.060304 2018