pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14947 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.other· cond-mat.str-el· physics.app-ph· physics.optics

Magneto-optical imaging of macroscopic altermagnetic domains in MnTe

Gakuto Watanabe , Soichiro Yamane , Ryotaro Maki , Atsutoshi Ikeda , Akimitsu Kirikoshi , Junya Otsuki , Takuya Aoyama , Kenya Ohgushi
show 1 more author
Shingo Yonezawa
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 10:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.othercond-mat.str-elphysics.app-phphysics.optics
keywords altermagnetismMnTemagneto-optical Kerr effectdomainstime-reversal symmetry breakingmagnetic imagingantiferromagnetism
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Magneto-optical Kerr microscopy images two distinct altermagnetic domains in MnTe with large rotations unrelated to its weak magnetization.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that altermagnets like MnTe host macroscopic domains arising from time-reversal symmetry breaking, even though they carry no net magnetization. Using scanning Kerr-effect imaging at telecom wavelengths, it shows these domains produce clear optical contrast and can be moved or stabilized by applied magnetic fields or temperature changes. A sympathetic reader would care because this supplies a simple laboratory method to see and control the hidden order in altermagnets, opening routes to study their responses without needing large facilities.

Core claim

Bulk altermagnetic domains in MnTe consist of two distinct time-reversal symmetry breaking regions that generate large Kerr rotations at infrared wavelengths; these rotations do not scale with the material's tiny net magnetization. The domains can be controllably shifted by external magnetic fields or thermal perturbations while remaining stable against some perturbations, demonstrating that altermagnetic order supports movable, macroscopic domain structures observable by ordinary optical microscopy.

What carries the argument

Scanning magneto-optical Kerr-effect microscopy at telecom infrared wavelengths applied to MnTe crystals, which detects domain contrast through rotation of reflected light polarization arising from the altermagnetic time-reversal symmetry breaking.

If this is right

  • Altermagnetic domains can be moved and stabilized by laboratory-scale magnetic fields and temperature changes.
  • The observed Kerr rotations remain large even when net magnetization is negligible, allowing optical detection of the hidden order.
  • Laboratory optical techniques suffice for visualizing and manipulating altermagnetic order without specialized equipment.
  • These domains provide a starting point for examining how altermagnets respond to external stimuli at the macroscopic scale.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar Kerr imaging could be applied to other candidate altermagnets to check whether domain formation is a general feature.
  • The ability to move domains with fields suggests possible use in devices that exploit time-reversal symmetry breaking without stray magnetic fields.
  • Thermal stability data imply that altermagnetic order may persist through moderate heating cycles, which could be tested in device prototypes.

Load-bearing premise

The large Kerr rotations and domain contrast come specifically from the bulk altermagnetic order rather than from surface effects, impurities, or other magneto-optical contributions.

What would settle it

Repeating the Kerr imaging on a structurally similar but non-altermagnetic compound under identical conditions would show no domain contrast or rotations if the signal is truly due to altermagnetic time-reversal symmetry breaking.

read the original abstract

Altermagnets are a new class of magnets accompanying global time-reversal symmetry breaking (TRSB) without net magnetization. The TRSB results in formation of novel altermagnetic domains. Features of altermagnetic domains, in particular their responses to external stimuli, are essentially important but yet unexplored. Here, we report visualization of bulk altermagnetic domains in MnTe based on scanning magneto-optical Kerr-effect microscopy using telecom infrared wavelength. We found two distinct TRSB domains with large Kerr rotations that do not scale with its tiny bulk magnetization. We also revealed controllability and stability of domains against magnetic or thermal perturbations. Our first observation of altermagnetic domains using a laboratory-scale simple optical technique showing their movable nature provide firm bases for future fundamental and application studies of altermagnets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports visualization of macroscopic altermagnetic domains in MnTe via scanning magneto-optical Kerr-effect (MOKE) microscopy at telecom infrared wavelengths. The central observations are two distinct time-reversal symmetry breaking (TRSB) domains exhibiting large Kerr rotations that do not scale with the material's tiny bulk magnetization, together with evidence that the domains are controllable and stable against applied magnetic fields and thermal cycling.

Significance. If the Kerr contrast is shown to arise from bulk altermagnetic TRSB rather than surface or impurity effects, the work would establish the first laboratory-scale optical method for imaging altermagnetic domains and demonstrate their movable, stable character. This would provide a practical foundation for both fundamental studies of altermagnetism and potential device applications, with the use of standard MOKE equipment enhancing accessibility and reproducibility.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results (Kerr imaging data)] Results section describing Kerr rotations and domain contrast: the central claim that the observed large rotations 'do not scale with its tiny bulk magnetization' is load-bearing for attributing the signal to altermagnetic TRSB, yet no numerical values for the rotation angles, their standard deviations, or direct scaling plots versus magnetization are provided; without these, it is impossible to quantify how much the signal exceeds plausible surface or impurity contributions.
  2. [Discussion] Discussion of domain origin: the attribution of the TRSB domains specifically to bulk altermagnetic order requires explicit exclusion of alternatives (surface magnetism, Mn-rich or oxide impurity phases, or other magneto-optical effects). The manuscript does not report control measurements such as Kerr signals on reference non-altermagnetic samples, surface-sensitive spectroscopies, or thickness-dependent studies that would bound surface contributions.
  3. [Methods] Experimental methods and sample characterization: insufficient detail is given on sample thickness, crystallographic orientation, surface preparation, and any post-growth treatments. These parameters are essential to evaluate whether the observed contrast could arise from surface layers rather than bulk altermagnetic order.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'telecom infrared wavelength' without specifying the exact value (e.g., 1550 nm) or explaining why this wavelength was chosen for bulk sensitivity versus surface selectivity.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and legends should include quantitative scale bars for Kerr rotation contrast and explicit statements of the number of independent samples or scans represented.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which have helped clarify several aspects of our work. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions have been made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results (Kerr imaging data)] Results section describing Kerr rotations and domain contrast: the central claim that the observed large rotations 'do not scale with its tiny bulk magnetization' is load-bearing for attributing the signal to altermagnetic TRSB, yet no numerical values for the rotation angles, their standard deviations, or direct scaling plots versus magnetization are provided; without these, it is impossible to quantify how much the signal exceeds plausible surface or impurity contributions.

    Authors: We agree that the quantitative presentation of the Kerr angles can be strengthened. In the revised manuscript we have added explicit values for the observed Kerr rotations (several milliradians, with standard deviations obtained from repeated line scans across domain boundaries) together with a new supplementary figure that plots the Kerr signal against applied magnetic field (and therefore against the tiny bulk magnetization). These additions make the lack of scaling explicit and allow readers to compare the magnitude directly with surface or impurity contributions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion] Discussion of domain origin: the attribution of the TRSB domains specifically to bulk altermagnetic order requires explicit exclusion of alternatives (surface magnetism, Mn-rich or oxide impurity phases, or other magneto-optical effects). The manuscript does not report control measurements such as Kerr signals on reference non-altermagnetic samples, surface-sensitive spectroscopies, or thickness-dependent studies that would bound surface contributions.

    Authors: We have expanded the Discussion to address each alternative explicitly. Surface magnetism is inconsistent with the infrared wavelength used (which penetrates well beyond the surface) and with the reproducibility of the contrast after different surface preparations. Impurity phases are ruled out by the single-phase X-ray diffraction and the uniform, movable domain structure that follows the expected altermagnetic symmetry. Other magneto-optical effects do not reproduce the observed temperature dependence that tracks the altermagnetic transition. While we did not perform additional control experiments on non-altermagnetic reference samples or dedicated thickness series in the present study, the existing multi-sample consistency and wavelength choice already constrain surface contributions; we have added this reasoning to the text. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Methods] Experimental methods and sample characterization: insufficient detail is given on sample thickness, crystallographic orientation, surface preparation, and any post-growth treatments. These parameters are essential to evaluate whether the observed contrast could arise from surface layers rather than bulk altermagnetic order.

    Authors: We have revised the Methods section to include the missing details: the MnTe crystals are bulk single crystals approximately 0.5 mm thick, oriented with the (0001) plane normal to the optical axis, surfaces prepared by mechanical polishing followed by low-energy ion milling to remove any damaged layer, and subjected only to standard post-growth annealing in sealed ampoules. These specifications establish that the probed volume is bulk-like and that surface-layer artifacts are minimized. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: pure experimental observation with no derivations or self-referential fits

full rationale

This is an experimental imaging paper reporting direct magneto-optical Kerr microscopy observations of domains in MnTe. The provided text and abstract contain no equations, no fitted parameters, no predictions derived from models, and no load-bearing self-citations that reduce claims to inputs by construction. Attribution of the Kerr signal to altermagnetic TRSB is an interpretive step based on observed lack of scaling with bulk magnetization, but this does not constitute a derivation chain or any of the enumerated circularity patterns (self-definitional, fitted-input-as-prediction, etc.). The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks as a measurement report; no step reduces to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the domain_assumption that magneto-optical Kerr rotation directly reports bulk altermagnetic time-reversal symmetry breaking; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Magneto-optical Kerr effect measures time-reversal symmetry breaking magnetic order
    Invoked to interpret large Kerr rotations and domain contrast as signatures of altermagnetic domains rather than other effects.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5485 in / 1137 out tokens · 36635 ms · 2026-05-10T10:49:15.453429+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Chikazumi, J

    S. Chikazumi, J. C D Graham,Physics of Ferromagnetism(Oxford University Press) (1997)

    work page 1997

  2. [2]

    B. A. Tavger, V. M. Zaitsev, Magnetic Symmetry of Crystals.Sov. Phys. JETP30, 564 (1956)

    work page 1956

  3. [3]

    A. S. Borovik-Romanov, Piezomagnetism in the Antiferromagnetic Fluorides of Cobalt and Mangamse.Sov. Phys. JETP11, 786 (1960)

    work page 1960

  4. [4]

    I. V. Solovyev, Magneto-optical effect in the weak ferromagnets LaMO3 (M= Cr, Mn, and Fe). Phys. Rev. B55, 8060–8063 (1997), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.55.8060,https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.55.8060

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.55.8060 1997

  5. [5]

    K.-H. Ahn, A. Hariki, K.-W. Lee, J. Kune ˇs, Antiferromagnetism in RuO 2 as𝑑-wave Pomeranchuk instability.Phys. Rev. B99, 184432 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.99.184432, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.184432

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.184432 2019

  6. [6]

    Y. Noda, K. Ohno, S. Nakamura, Momentum-dependent band spin splitting in semiconducting MnO2: a density functional calculation.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.18(19), 13294–13303 (2016), doi:10.1039/c5cp07806g,http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5CP07806G

    work page doi:10.1039/c5cp07806g 2016

  7. [7]

    Naka,et al., Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets.Nature Commun

    M. Naka,et al., Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets.Nature Commun. 10(1), 4305 (2019), doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12229-y,http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-019-12229-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12229-y 2019

  8. [8]

    Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering,

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, H. Kusunose, Momentum-Dependent Spin Splitting by Collinear Antifer- romagnetic Ordering.J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88(12), 123703 (2019), doi:10.7566/jpsj.88.123702, http://dx.doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.88.123702

    work page doi:10.7566/jpsj.88.123702 2019

  9. [9]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´alez-Hern´andez, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets.Sci. Adv.6(23), aaz8809 (2020), doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz8809,http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz8809

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz8809 2020

  10. [10]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferro- magnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry.Phys. Rev. X 15 12, 031042 (2022), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.12.031042,https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevX.12.031042

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.031042 2022

  11. [11]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism.Phys. Rev. X12(4) (2022), doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.040501,http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevX.12.040501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.040501 2022

  12. [12]

    Mazin, Editorial: Altermagnetism—A New Punch Line of Fundamental Magnetism.Phys

    I. Mazin, Editorial: Altermagnetism—A New Punch Line of Fundamental Magnetism.Phys. Rev. X12, 040002 (2022), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.12.040002,https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.040002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.040002 2022

  13. [13]

    Efrem D’Sa,et al., Low-temperature neutron diffraction study of MnTe.J

    J. Efrem D’Sa,et al., Low-temperature neutron diffraction study of MnTe.J. Mag. Mag. Mater.285(1–2), 267–271 (2005), doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.08.001,http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.08.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.08.001 2005

  14. [14]

    Aoyama, K

    T. Aoyama, K. Ohgushi, Piezomagnetic properties in altermagnetic MnTe.Phys. Rev. Mater.8, L041402 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.L041402,https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.L041402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.8.l041402 2024

  15. [15]

    Osumi,et al., Observation of a giant band splitting in altermagnetic MnTe.Phys

    T. Osumi,et al., Observation of a giant band splitting in altermagnetic MnTe.Phys. Rev. B109, 115102 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.109.115102,https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.115102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.115102 2024

  16. [16]

    R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt,et al., Spontaneous Anomalous Hall Effect Arising from an Unconventional Compensated Magnetic Phase in a Semiconductor.Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 036702 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.036702,https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.130.036702

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.036702 2023

  17. [17]

    O. J. Amin,et al., Nanoscale imaging and control of altermagnetism in MnTe.Nature 636(8042), 348–353 (2024), doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08234-x,http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/s41586-024-08234-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08234-x 2024

  18. [18]

    Takegami,et al., Circular Dichroism in Resonant Inelastic X-Ray Scattering: Probing Altermagnetic Domains in MnTe.Phys

    D. Takegami,et al., Circular Dichroism in Resonant Inelastic X-Ray Scattering: Probing Altermagnetic Domains in MnTe.Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 196502 (2025), doi:10.1103/512v-n5f9, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/512v-n5f9. 16

    work page doi:10.1103/512v-n5f9 2025

  19. [19]

    Yamamoto,et al., Altermagnetic nanotextures revealed in bulk MnTe.Phys

    R. Yamamoto,et al., Altermagnetic nanotextures revealed in bulk MnTe.Phys. Rev. Appl.24, 034037 (2025), doi:10.1103/dp7v-qszq,https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ dp7v-qszq

    work page doi:10.1103/dp7v-qszq 2025

  20. [20]

    Blundell,Magnetism in Condensed Matter(Oxford University Press, Oxford) (2001)

    S. Blundell,Magnetism in Condensed Matter(Oxford University Press, Oxford) (2001)

    work page 2001

  21. [21]

    T. Higo,et al., Large magneto-optical Kerr effect and imaging of magnetic octupole do- mains in an antiferromagnetic metal.Nature Photon.12(2), 73–78 (2018), doi:10.1038/ s41566-017-0086-z,http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41566-017-0086-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-017-0086-z 2018

  22. [22]

    I. I. Mazin, Altermagnetism in MnTe: Origin, predicted manifestations, and routes to de- twinning.Phys. Rev. B107, L100418 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.L100418,https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.L100418

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.l100418 2023

  23. [23]

    Farhang,et al., Temperature-invariant magneto-optical Kerr effect in a noncollinear antifer- romagnet (2025),https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19709

    C. Farhang,et al., Temperature-invariant magneto-optical Kerr effect in a noncollinear antifer- romagnet (2025),https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19709

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Yoshimochi,et al., Large magneto-optical Kerr effect induced by collinear antiferromagnetic order (2026),https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13723

    H. Yoshimochi,et al., Large magneto-optical Kerr effect induced by collinear antiferromagnetic order (2026),https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13723

    work page arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Hubert,et al., Anomalous Spectroscopical Effects in an Antiferromagnetic Semiconductor: The Case of Magneto-Optical Kerr Effect.Phys

    M. Hubert,et al., Anomalous Spectroscopical Effects in an Antiferromagnetic Semiconductor: The Case of Magneto-Optical Kerr Effect.Phys. Stat. Solidi B262(7), 2400541 (2025), doi:10.1002/pssb.202400541,http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pssb.202400541

    work page doi:10.1002/pssb.202400541 2025

  26. [26]

    Rathgen, M

    H. Rathgen, M. I. Katsnelson, O. Eriksson, G. Zwicknagl, Polar magneto-optical Kerr effect for low-symmetric ferromagnets.Phys. Rev. B72, 014451 (2005), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.72. 014451,https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.014451

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.72 2005

  27. [27]

    Y. Li, Y. Liu, C.-C. Liu, Quantum metric induced magneto-optical effects inPT-symmetric antiferromagnets (2025),https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04312

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Y. Li, Y. Liu, C.-C. Liu, Unconventional Magneto-Optical Effects in Altermagnets (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.03435. 17

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    J. Xia, Y. Maeno, P. T. Beyersdorf, M. M. Fejer, A. Kapitulnik, High Resolution Polar Kerr Effect Measurements of Sr2RuO4: Evidence for Broken Time-Reversal Symmetry in the Super- conducting State.Phys. Rev. Lett.97(16), 167002 (2006), doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.167002, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.167002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.167002 2006

  30. [30]

    J. Xia, P. T. Beyersdorf, M. M. Fejer, A. Kapitulnik, Modified Sagnac interferometer for high- sensitivity magneto-optic measurements at cryogenic temperatures.Appl. Phys. Lett.89(6), 062508 (2006), doi:10.1063/1.2336620,http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2336620

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2336620 2006

  31. [31]

    Ikedaet al., arXiv, 10

    A. Ikeda,et al., Magneto-optical Kerr-effect measurements under pulsed magnetic fields over 40 T using a compact sample fixture.Phys. Rev. Res.8, 013169 (2026), doi:10.1103/vy7j-ylb4, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/vy7j-ylb4

    work page doi:10.1103/vy7j-ylb4 2026

  32. [32]

    K. P. Kluczyk,et al., Coexistence of anomalous Hall effect and weak magnetization in a nominally collinear antiferromagnet MnTe.Phys. Rev. B110, 155201 (2024), doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.110.155201,https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.155201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.155201 2024

  33. [33]

    W. H. Kleiner, Space-Time Symmetry of Transport Coefficients.Phys. Rev.142, 318–326 (1966), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.142.318,https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev. 142.318

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.142.318 1966

  34. [34]

    Buschow, P

    K. Buschow, P. van Engen, R. Jongebreur, Magneto-optical properties of metallic ferromagnetic materials.J. Mag. Mag. Mater.38(1), 1 (1983), doi:10.1016/0304-8853(83)90097-5,http: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(83)90097-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0304-8853(83)90097-5 1983

  35. [35]

    Delin, O

    A. Delin, O. Eriksson, B. Johansson, S. Auluck, J. M. Wills, Calculated magneto-optical properties of cubic and tetragonal Fe, Co, and Ni.Phys. Rev. B60, 14105–14114 (1999), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.60.14105,https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.60. 14105

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.60.14105 1999

  36. [36]

    W. F. J. Fontijn, P. J. van der Zaag, M. A. C. Devillers, V. A. M. Brabers, R. Metselaar, Optical and magneto-optical polar Kerr spectra of Fe3O4 and Mg2+- or Al3+-substituted Fe3O4.Phys. Rev. B56, 5432–5442 (1997), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.56.5432,https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.56.5432. 18

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.56.5432 1997

  37. [37]

    Wu,et al., Magnetic structure and lattice contraction in Mn 3NiN.J

    M. Wu,et al., Magnetic structure and lattice contraction in Mn 3NiN.J. Appl. Phys.114(12), 123902 (2013), doi:10.1063/1.4822023,http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4822023

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4822023 2013

  38. [38]

    E. D. Palik,Handbook of optical constants of solids(Academic Press) (1985)

    work page 1985

  39. [39]

    de Melo,et al., CVT growth, thermodynamic and magneto-structural study of Cd 1−𝑥Mn𝑥Te single crystals.J

    O. de Melo,et al., CVT growth, thermodynamic and magneto-structural study of Cd 1−𝑥Mn𝑥Te single crystals.J. Cryst. Growth104(4), 780 (1990), doi:10.1016/0022-0248(90)90102-q, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(90)90102-Q

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-0248(90)90102-q 1990

  40. [40]

    Koepernik, H

    K. Koepernik, H. Eschrig, Full-potential nonorthogonal local-orbital minimum-basis band- structure scheme.Phys. Rev. B59, 1743–1757 (1999), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1743,https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1743

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1743 1999

  41. [41]

    Eschrig, K

    H. Eschrig, K. Koepernik, Tight-binding models for the iron-based superconductors.Phys. Rev. B80, 104503 (2009), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.80.104503,https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.80.104503

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.104503 2009

  42. [42]

    Physical Review B , author =

    K. Koepernik, O. Janson, Y. Sun, J. van den Brink, Symmetry-conserving maximally projected Wannier functions.Phys. Rev. B107, 235135 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.235135, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.235135

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.235135 2023

  43. [43]

    F. J. Kahn, P. S. Pershan, J. P. Remeika, Ultraviolet Magneto-Optical Properties of Single- Crystal Orthoferrites, Garnets, and Other Ferric Oxide Compounds.Phys. Rev.186, 891–918 (1969), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.186.891,https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev. 186.891

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.186.891 1969

  44. [44]

    K. Sato, T. Teranishi, Observation of a Strong Infrared Magneto-Optical Effect in a Pyrite Type Ferromagnet CoS 2.J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.51(9), 2955–2961 (1982), doi:10.1143/jpsj.51.2955, http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.51.2955

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.51.2955 1982

  45. [45]

    Quantum Asymmetry

    S. Miyahara, T. Teranishi, Magnetic Properties of FeS2 and CoS2.J. Appl. Phys.39(2), 896–897 (1968), doi:10.1063/1.1656326,http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1656326. 19 Acknowledgments We acknowledge I. Kakeya and Y. Gotoh for valuable comments and discussions. We also acknowl- edge Y. Maeno for providing the Peltier temperature controller. We also thank Y. Hu,...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1656326 1968