Unconventional Photon Blockade in a Symmetrically Driven Nonlinear Dimer

Hamid Ohadi

arxiv: 2604.14963 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Unconventional Photon Blockade in a Symmetrically Driven Nonlinear Dimer

Hamid Ohadi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 10:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics

keywords unconventional photon blockadeKerr dimersymmetric drivephoton antibunchingnonlinear opticsquantum opticsphotonic moleculesphase difference

0 comments

The pith

Symmetric Kerr dimer achieves unconventional photon blockade with weak nonlinearity and moderate coupling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that a symmetric two-cavity system with Kerr nonlinearity produces strong photon antibunching when both cavities receive equal-amplitude drives at a 90-degree phase difference. This unconventional blockade occurs even though the nonlinearity U is much smaller than the loss rate gamma and the inter-cavity coupling is only gamma over 4. A reader would care because typical photon blockade demands hard-to-reach strong nonlinearities, while this approach uses standard photonic molecules and tolerates fabrication errors by simply adjusting the drive phase. The light emitted from one site shows antibunching with a smooth correlation function free of oscillations, measurable by ordinary detectors. The effect holds for both continuous-wave and pulsed driving.

Core claim

We demonstrate unconventional photon blockade in a symmetric Kerr dimer driven with equal-amplitude fields at a 90° phase difference. The minimum inter-cavity coupling is J_min = γ/4 at a Kerr nonlinearity U ≪ γ achievable in standard photonic molecules. The quadrature-driven site emits strongly antibunched light with a smooth, oscillation-free second-order correlator directly resolvable with standard detectors. The scheme operates under continuous-wave and pulsed excitation, and fabrication disorder can be fully compensated by re-tuning the drive phase, removing the need for post-fabrication cavity trimming.

What carries the argument

The symmetric quadrature drive at 90° phase difference applied to a Kerr nonlinear dimer, which uses interference to suppress two-photon states at one site while allowing single-photon emission.

If this is right

The blockade produces a smooth second-order correlator without oscillations that standard detectors can resolve directly.
The effect persists under both continuous-wave and pulsed excitation.
Fabrication disorder is compensated simply by retuning the drive phase, eliminating any need for cavity trimming after fabrication.
The required conditions are reachable in ordinary photonic molecules where U is much less than gamma.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar phase-tuned symmetric drives could enable blockade effects in larger arrays of coupled cavities without demanding individually strong nonlinearities at every site.
The ability to retune phase for disorder compensation suggests a route to robust operation in integrated photonic circuits where exact symmetry is difficult to fabricate.
The specific threshold of J equal to gamma/4 sets a clear experimental target for testing the onset of this unconventional blockade.

Load-bearing premise

The dimer stays perfectly symmetric and the two drives maintain exactly equal amplitudes and a precise 90-degree phase difference while the nonlinearity stays much weaker than the loss rate.

What would settle it

Measuring the second-order correlation function at the quadrature-driven site and finding that it fails to drop below 1 or develops oscillations when the phase is set to exactly 90 degrees, the coupling is gamma/4, and U is much smaller than gamma.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14963 by Hamid Ohadi.

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Second-order correlators at the optimal point ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Parameter landscape at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Pulsed excitation ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We demonstrate unconventional photon blockade in a symmetric Kerr dimer driven with equal-amplitude fields at a $90^\circ$ phase difference. The minimum inter-cavity coupling is $J_{\min} = \gamma/4$ at a Kerr nonlinearity $U \ll \gamma$ achievable in standard photonic molecules. The quadrature-driven site emits strongly antibunched light with a smooth, oscillation-free second-order correlator directly resolvable with standard detectors. The scheme operates under continuous-wave and pulsed excitation, and fabrication disorder can be fully compensated by re-tuning the drive phase, removing the need for post-fabrication cavity trimming.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The 90-degree symmetric drive nulls the two-photon amplitude analytically at J = gamma/4 even for weak U, with numerics confirming smooth antibunching and phase tuning for disorder.

read the letter

The main point is that equal-amplitude drives at 90 degrees on a symmetric Kerr dimer give unconventional photon blockade down to J_min = gamma/4 when U is much less than gamma. They reach this by setting the two-photon amplitude to zero in the weak-drive limit of the master equation, which the phase difference turns into quadrature driving on one site. That produces an explicit condition without needing strong nonlinearity or broken symmetry. The Lindblad numerics then show g2(0) stays low with monotonic decay and no oscillations, which is detector-friendly. They also run simulations where retuning the drive phase restores antibunching under static frequency disorder, removing the usual need for cavity trimming. This is the practical angle for standard photonic molecules. The derivation uses the standard two-mode Hamiltonian and dissipator with no hidden steps that break the regime. The soft spots are modest: everything stays in the weak-drive limit, so higher powers could bring multi-photon terms that the paper does not explore in detail. The disorder compensation works in the simulations shown but real fabrication variations might be broader than the static frequency shifts tested. Still, the core claim holds up on the evidence given. This is for experimental groups working on integrated photonic circuits or single-photon sources who already have weak Kerr media and want a drive-based workaround. A reader in nonlinear quantum optics would find the scheme and the disorder tolerance directly usable. The analytical step plus straightforward numerics make it worth a serious referee even if some sections need expansion on power scaling.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript demonstrates unconventional photon blockade in a symmetric Kerr nonlinear dimer driven by equal-amplitude fields with a 90° phase difference. It analytically derives a minimum inter-cavity coupling J_min = γ/4 in the weak-drive limit by nulling the two-photon amplitude, shows g^{(2)}(0) ≪ 1 with monotonic decay via numerical integration of the Lindblad master equation for U/γ ≪ 1, and establishes that the scheme functions under both continuous-wave and pulsed excitation while allowing full compensation of static frequency disorder through drive-phase re-tuning.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work is significant because it enables strong antibunching in standard photonic molecules using only weak Kerr nonlinearity (U ≪ γ) and symmetry/phase control, without post-fabrication trimming or strong-coupling requirements. The combination of an explicit analytical condition, numerical confirmation of the correlator, and disorder-robustness via phase adjustment provides a concrete, experimentally accessible route to on-chip single-photon sources.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states specific values (J_min = γ/4, U ≪ γ) without cross-references to the corresponding derivation or equation in the main text; adding such pointers would improve immediate readability.
[Numerical results] The description of the numerical integration of the Lindblad equation would benefit from a brief statement of the integration method, time-step size, and truncation criteria used to confirm monotonic decay of g^{(2)}(0).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The summary accurately captures the central results on unconventional photon blockade under symmetric 90° phase-difference driving, the analytical condition J_min = γ/4, the numerical confirmation of strong antibunching, and the disorder compensation via phase tuning. We are pleased that the experimental accessibility and significance for on-chip single-photon sources are recognized.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The central result J_min = γ/4 is obtained by directly solving the two-mode Lindblad master equation in the weak-drive limit and setting the steady-state two-photon amplitude to zero under symmetric equal-amplitude 90°-phase driving. This is a standard perturbative calculation on the usual Kerr-dimer Hamiltonian plus dissipator; the condition follows from the algebra of the equations of motion without any fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. Numerical integration of the full master equation independently verifies g^(2)(0) ≪ 1. The scheme contains no ansatz smuggling, uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work, or renaming of known results as new derivations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the standard driven-dissipative Kerr dimer master equation with symmetric parameters and coherent drives; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)

J_min
Minimum coupling value gamma/4 is stated as the threshold for the blockade effect under the given drive.
U / gamma
Ratio assumed much less than 1, treated as achievable in standard devices.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Standard Kerr nonlinearity and Markovian loss in the dimer Hamiltonian and master equation.
Invoked implicitly to model the photonic molecule.
domain assumption Exact 90-degree phase difference and equal amplitudes in the drives.
Central to the symmetric drive scheme.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5387 in / 1310 out tokens · 21883 ms · 2026-05-10T10:38:03.317115+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

[1]

where enhanced nonlinearities are accessible. A particularly compact implementation is possible within asinglebirefringent micropillar [27], where the H and V polarisation modes play the roles of the two sites, the polarisation splittingδprovides the hopping J=δ/2, and the quadrature drive conditionF 2 =iF 1 is satisfied by circularly polarised excitation...

work page
[2]

Couteau, S

C. Couteau, S. Barz, T. Durt, T. Gerrits, J. Huwer, R. Prevedel, J. Rarity, A. Shields, and G. Weihs, Ap- plications of single photons to quantum communication and computing, Nature Reviews Physics5, 326 (2023)

work page 2023
[3]

Tian and H

L. Tian and H. J. Carmichael, Quantum trajectory sim- ulations of two-state behavior in an optical cavity con- taining one atom, Physical Review A46, R6801 (1992)

work page 1992
[4]

Imamo¯ glu, H

A. Imamo¯ glu, H. Schmidt, G. Woods, and M. Deutsch, Strongly Interacting Photons in a Nonlinear Cavity, Physical Review Letters79, 1467 (1997)

work page 1997
[5]

K. M. Birnbaum, A. Boca, R. Miller, A. D. Boozer, T. E. Northup, and H. J. Kimble, Photon blockade in an optical cavity with one trapped atom, Nature436, 87 (2005)

work page 2005
[6]

C. Lang, D. Bozyigit, C. Eichler, L. Steffen, J. M. Fink, A. A. Abdumalikov, M. Baur, S. Filipp, M. P. Da Silva, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Observation of Resonant Pho- ton Blockade at Microwave Frequencies Using Correla- tion Function Measurements, Physical Review Letters 106, 243601 (2011)

work page 2011
[7]

Faraon, I

A. Faraon, I. Fushman, D. Englund, N. Stoltz, P. Petroff, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Coherent generation of non-classical light on a chip via photon-induced tunnelling and block- ade, Nature Physics4, 859 (2008)

work page 2008
[8]

Michler, A

P. Michler, A. Kiraz, C. Becher, W. V. Schoenfeld, P. M. Petroff, L. Zhang, E. Hu, and A. Imamoglu, A Quantum Dot Single-Photon Turnstile Device, Science290, 2282 (2000)

work page 2000
[9]

Senellart, G

P. Senellart, G. Solomon, and A. White, High- performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources, Nature Nanotechnology12, 1026 (2017)

work page 2017
[10]

Delteil, T

A. Delteil, T. Fink, A. Schade, S. H¨ ofling, C. Schnei- der, and A. ˙Imamo˘ glu, Towards polariton blockade of confined exciton–polaritons, Nature Materials18, 219 (2019), tex.ids= delteilPolaritonBlockadeConfined2019 number: 3

work page 2019
[11]

Mu˜ noz-Matutano, A

G. Mu˜ noz-Matutano, A. Wood, M. Johnsson, X. Vidal, B. Q. Baragiola, A. Reinhard, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, J. Bloch, A. Amo, G. Nogues, B. Besga, M. Richard, and T. Volz, Emergence of quantum correlations from interacting fibre-cavity polaritons, Nature Materials18, 213 (2019)

work page 2019
[12]

Zhang, F

L. Zhang, F. Wu, S. Hou, Z. Zhang, Y.-H. Chou, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. R. Forrest, and H. Deng, Van der Waals heterostructure polaritons with moir´ e- induced nonlinearity, Nature591, 61 (2021)

work page 2021
[13]

T. C. H. Liew and V. Savona, Single Photons from Coupled Quantum Modes, Physical Review Letters104, 183601 (2010)

work page 2010
[14]

Bamba, A

M. Bamba, A. Imamo˘ glu, I. Carusotto, and C. Ciuti, Origin of strong photon antibunching in weakly nonlin- ear photonic molecules, Physical Review A83, 021802 (2011)

work page 2011
[15]

Ferretti, L

S. Ferretti, L. C. Andreani, H. E. T¨ ureci, and D. Gerace, Photon correlations in a two-site nonlinear cavity system under coherent drive and dissipation, Physical Review A 82, 013841 (2010)

work page 2010
[16]

Flayac and V

H. Flayac and V. Savona, Unconventional photon block- ade, Physical Review A96, 053810 (2017)

work page 2017
[17]

Flayac, D

H. Flayac, D. Gerace, and V. Savona, An all-silicon single-photon source by unconventional photon blockade, Scientific Reports5, 11223 (2015)

work page 2015
[18]

Flayac and V

H. Flayac and V. Savona, Single photons from dissipation in coupled cavities, Physical Review A94, 013815 (2016)

work page 2016
[19]

Y. Wang, X. Zheng, T. C. H. Liew, and Y. D. Chong, Long-Lived Photon Blockade with Weak Optical Nonlin- earity (2025), arXiv:2502.09930 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[20]

S1), the general drive-phase analysis and phase-range table (Sec

See Supplemental Material at [URL] for the full deriva- tion of theC 02 = 0 condition (Sec. S1), the general drive-phase analysis and phase-range table (Sec. S2), the linear dark-state proof (Sec. S3), the analyticg (2) 22 (τ) andg (2) 11 (τ) derivations (Sec. S4), numerical methods (Sec. S5), tabulated peak-overshoot values and theJ- scan figure (Sec. S6...

work page
[21]

H. Z. Shen, Y. H. Zhou, H. D. Liu, G. C. Wang, and X. X. Yi, Exact optimal control of photon blockade with weakly nonlinear coupled cavities, Optics Express23, 32835 (2015)

work page 2015
[22]

Y. D. Chong, L. Ge, H. Cao, and A. D. Stone, Coher- ent Perfect Absorbers: Time-Reversed Lasers, Physical Review Letters105, 053901 (2010)

work page 2010
[23]

Zanotto, F

S. Zanotto, F. P. Mezzapesa, F. Bianco, G. Biasiol, L. Baldacci, M. S. Vitiello, L. Sorba, R. Colombelli, and A. Tredicucci, Perfect energy-feeding into strongly cou- pled systems and interferometric control of polariton ab- sorption, Nature Physics10, 830 (2014)

work page 2014
[24]

Orfanakis, S

K. Orfanakis, S. K. Rajendran, V. Walther, T. Volz, T. Pohl, and H. Ohadi, Rydberg exciton–polaritons in a Cu2O microcavity, Nature Materials21, 767 (2022), number: 7

work page 2022
[25]

Galbiati, L

M. Galbiati, L. Ferrier, D. D. Solnyshkov, D. Tanese, E. Wertz, A. Amo, M. Abbarchi, P. Senellart, I. Sagnes, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, E. Galopin, G. Malpuech, and J. Bloch, Polariton Condensation in Photonic Molecules, Physical Review Letters108, 126403 (2012)

work page 2012
[26]

Abbarchi, A

M. Abbarchi, A. Amo, V. G. Sala, D. D. Solnyshkov, H. Flayac, L. Ferrier, I. Sagnes, E. Galopin, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, G. Malpuech, and J. Bloch, Macroscopic quantum self- trapping and Josephson oscillations of exciton polaritons, Nature Physics9, 275 (2013)

work page 2013
[27]

Kyriienko, D

O. Kyriienko, D. Krizhanovskii, and I. Shelykh, Nonlin- ear Quantum Optics with Trion Polaritons in 2D Mono- layers: Conventional and Unconventional Photon Block- ade, Physical Review Letters125, 197402 (2020)

work page 2020
[28]

Reitzenstein, C

S. Reitzenstein, C. B¨ ockler, A. L¨ offler, S. H¨ ofling, L. Worschech, A. Forchel, P. Yao, and S. Hughes, Polarization-dependent strong coupling in elliptical high- $Q$micropillar cavities, Physical Review B82, 235313 (2010)

work page 2010
[29]

Vladimirova, S

M. Vladimirova, S. Cronenberger, D. Scalbert, K. V. Ka- vokin, A. Miard, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, J. Bloch, D. Solnyshkov, 6 G. Malpuech, and A. V. Kavokin, Polariton-polariton in- teraction constants in microcavities, Physical Review B 82, 075301 (2010)

work page 2010
[30]

J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications184, 1234 (2013). 7 Supplemental Material Unconventional Photon Blockade in a Symmetrically Driven Nonlinear Dimer H. Ohadi S1. DERIV ATION OF THEC 02 = 0CONDITION ATϕ= 90 ◦ A. Hamiltonian and Lindblad Master Equ...

work page 2013

[1] [1]

where enhanced nonlinearities are accessible. A particularly compact implementation is possible within asinglebirefringent micropillar [27], where the H and V polarisation modes play the roles of the two sites, the polarisation splittingδprovides the hopping J=δ/2, and the quadrature drive conditionF 2 =iF 1 is satisfied by circularly polarised excitation...

work page

[2] [2]

Couteau, S

C. Couteau, S. Barz, T. Durt, T. Gerrits, J. Huwer, R. Prevedel, J. Rarity, A. Shields, and G. Weihs, Ap- plications of single photons to quantum communication and computing, Nature Reviews Physics5, 326 (2023)

work page 2023

[3] [3]

Tian and H

L. Tian and H. J. Carmichael, Quantum trajectory sim- ulations of two-state behavior in an optical cavity con- taining one atom, Physical Review A46, R6801 (1992)

work page 1992

[4] [4]

Imamo¯ glu, H

A. Imamo¯ glu, H. Schmidt, G. Woods, and M. Deutsch, Strongly Interacting Photons in a Nonlinear Cavity, Physical Review Letters79, 1467 (1997)

work page 1997

[5] [5]

K. M. Birnbaum, A. Boca, R. Miller, A. D. Boozer, T. E. Northup, and H. J. Kimble, Photon blockade in an optical cavity with one trapped atom, Nature436, 87 (2005)

work page 2005

[6] [6]

C. Lang, D. Bozyigit, C. Eichler, L. Steffen, J. M. Fink, A. A. Abdumalikov, M. Baur, S. Filipp, M. P. Da Silva, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Observation of Resonant Pho- ton Blockade at Microwave Frequencies Using Correla- tion Function Measurements, Physical Review Letters 106, 243601 (2011)

work page 2011

[7] [7]

Faraon, I

A. Faraon, I. Fushman, D. Englund, N. Stoltz, P. Petroff, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Coherent generation of non-classical light on a chip via photon-induced tunnelling and block- ade, Nature Physics4, 859 (2008)

work page 2008

[8] [8]

Michler, A

P. Michler, A. Kiraz, C. Becher, W. V. Schoenfeld, P. M. Petroff, L. Zhang, E. Hu, and A. Imamoglu, A Quantum Dot Single-Photon Turnstile Device, Science290, 2282 (2000)

work page 2000

[9] [9]

Senellart, G

P. Senellart, G. Solomon, and A. White, High- performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources, Nature Nanotechnology12, 1026 (2017)

work page 2017

[10] [10]

Delteil, T

A. Delteil, T. Fink, A. Schade, S. H¨ ofling, C. Schnei- der, and A. ˙Imamo˘ glu, Towards polariton blockade of confined exciton–polaritons, Nature Materials18, 219 (2019), tex.ids= delteilPolaritonBlockadeConfined2019 number: 3

work page 2019

[11] [11]

Mu˜ noz-Matutano, A

G. Mu˜ noz-Matutano, A. Wood, M. Johnsson, X. Vidal, B. Q. Baragiola, A. Reinhard, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, J. Bloch, A. Amo, G. Nogues, B. Besga, M. Richard, and T. Volz, Emergence of quantum correlations from interacting fibre-cavity polaritons, Nature Materials18, 213 (2019)

work page 2019

[12] [12]

Zhang, F

L. Zhang, F. Wu, S. Hou, Z. Zhang, Y.-H. Chou, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. R. Forrest, and H. Deng, Van der Waals heterostructure polaritons with moir´ e- induced nonlinearity, Nature591, 61 (2021)

work page 2021

[13] [13]

T. C. H. Liew and V. Savona, Single Photons from Coupled Quantum Modes, Physical Review Letters104, 183601 (2010)

work page 2010

[14] [14]

Bamba, A

M. Bamba, A. Imamo˘ glu, I. Carusotto, and C. Ciuti, Origin of strong photon antibunching in weakly nonlin- ear photonic molecules, Physical Review A83, 021802 (2011)

work page 2011

[15] [15]

Ferretti, L

S. Ferretti, L. C. Andreani, H. E. T¨ ureci, and D. Gerace, Photon correlations in a two-site nonlinear cavity system under coherent drive and dissipation, Physical Review A 82, 013841 (2010)

work page 2010

[16] [16]

Flayac and V

H. Flayac and V. Savona, Unconventional photon block- ade, Physical Review A96, 053810 (2017)

work page 2017

[17] [17]

Flayac, D

H. Flayac, D. Gerace, and V. Savona, An all-silicon single-photon source by unconventional photon blockade, Scientific Reports5, 11223 (2015)

work page 2015

[18] [18]

Flayac and V

H. Flayac and V. Savona, Single photons from dissipation in coupled cavities, Physical Review A94, 013815 (2016)

work page 2016

[19] [19]

Y. Wang, X. Zheng, T. C. H. Liew, and Y. D. Chong, Long-Lived Photon Blockade with Weak Optical Nonlin- earity (2025), arXiv:2502.09930 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025

[20] [20]

S1), the general drive-phase analysis and phase-range table (Sec

See Supplemental Material at [URL] for the full deriva- tion of theC 02 = 0 condition (Sec. S1), the general drive-phase analysis and phase-range table (Sec. S2), the linear dark-state proof (Sec. S3), the analyticg (2) 22 (τ) andg (2) 11 (τ) derivations (Sec. S4), numerical methods (Sec. S5), tabulated peak-overshoot values and theJ- scan figure (Sec. S6...

work page

[21] [21]

H. Z. Shen, Y. H. Zhou, H. D. Liu, G. C. Wang, and X. X. Yi, Exact optimal control of photon blockade with weakly nonlinear coupled cavities, Optics Express23, 32835 (2015)

work page 2015

[22] [22]

Y. D. Chong, L. Ge, H. Cao, and A. D. Stone, Coher- ent Perfect Absorbers: Time-Reversed Lasers, Physical Review Letters105, 053901 (2010)

work page 2010

[23] [23]

Zanotto, F

S. Zanotto, F. P. Mezzapesa, F. Bianco, G. Biasiol, L. Baldacci, M. S. Vitiello, L. Sorba, R. Colombelli, and A. Tredicucci, Perfect energy-feeding into strongly cou- pled systems and interferometric control of polariton ab- sorption, Nature Physics10, 830 (2014)

work page 2014

[24] [24]

Orfanakis, S

K. Orfanakis, S. K. Rajendran, V. Walther, T. Volz, T. Pohl, and H. Ohadi, Rydberg exciton–polaritons in a Cu2O microcavity, Nature Materials21, 767 (2022), number: 7

work page 2022

[25] [25]

Galbiati, L

M. Galbiati, L. Ferrier, D. D. Solnyshkov, D. Tanese, E. Wertz, A. Amo, M. Abbarchi, P. Senellart, I. Sagnes, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, E. Galopin, G. Malpuech, and J. Bloch, Polariton Condensation in Photonic Molecules, Physical Review Letters108, 126403 (2012)

work page 2012

[26] [26]

Abbarchi, A

M. Abbarchi, A. Amo, V. G. Sala, D. D. Solnyshkov, H. Flayac, L. Ferrier, I. Sagnes, E. Galopin, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, G. Malpuech, and J. Bloch, Macroscopic quantum self- trapping and Josephson oscillations of exciton polaritons, Nature Physics9, 275 (2013)

work page 2013

[27] [27]

Kyriienko, D

O. Kyriienko, D. Krizhanovskii, and I. Shelykh, Nonlin- ear Quantum Optics with Trion Polaritons in 2D Mono- layers: Conventional and Unconventional Photon Block- ade, Physical Review Letters125, 197402 (2020)

work page 2020

[28] [28]

Reitzenstein, C

S. Reitzenstein, C. B¨ ockler, A. L¨ offler, S. H¨ ofling, L. Worschech, A. Forchel, P. Yao, and S. Hughes, Polarization-dependent strong coupling in elliptical high- $Q$micropillar cavities, Physical Review B82, 235313 (2010)

work page 2010

[29] [29]

Vladimirova, S

M. Vladimirova, S. Cronenberger, D. Scalbert, K. V. Ka- vokin, A. Miard, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, J. Bloch, D. Solnyshkov, 6 G. Malpuech, and A. V. Kavokin, Polariton-polariton in- teraction constants in microcavities, Physical Review B 82, 075301 (2010)

work page 2010

[30] [30]

J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications184, 1234 (2013). 7 Supplemental Material Unconventional Photon Blockade in a Symmetrically Driven Nonlinear Dimer H. Ohadi S1. DERIV ATION OF THEC 02 = 0CONDITION ATϕ= 90 ◦ A. Hamiltonian and Lindblad Master Equ...

work page 2013