arxiv: 2604.14982 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Spontaneous Emission, Free Energy, and Relaxation-Limited Processes in Setting Limits on Solar Energy Conversion Efficiency

Sumanta Mukherjee This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 08:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords conversionefficiencyenergylight-to-usable-energylimitapproximatelyemissionfree

0 comments

The pith

A simplified free-energy model for radiation estimates the thermodynamic maximum for light-to-usable-energy conversion at approximately 74%, validated by reproducing the Shockley-Queisser limit of 33%.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors argue that standard treatments of spontaneous emission limit our ability to set true efficiency bounds for solar cells. They therefore introduce a simplified way to compute the free energy available from radiation. Using this, they calculate an upper thermodynamic limit of roughly 74% for turning light into usable energy. To test the approach they show it can recover the well-known Shockley-Queisser limit of about 33% for ordinary single-junction cells. The same framework also includes non-radiative losses and photon up-conversion, producing a practical ceiling near 48% for multijunction or up-converting devices. The paper concludes that the real thermodynamic limit may be substantially higher than current estimates but will require a fuller theory of light-matter thermodynamics.

Core claim

Our approach allows a theoretical estimate of the thermodynamic maximum limit for light-to-usable-energy conversion, which is approximately 74%.

Load-bearing premise

The simplified approach to evaluate the free energy of radiation accurately captures the essential physics and is not limited by the same shortcomings the authors attribute to spontaneous-emission descriptions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14982 by Sumanta Mukherjee.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Panels (a) and (b) illustrate typical methods used for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Panel (a) shows the variation of the energy (power) conversion efficiency, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Panel (a) shows the variation of the energy (power) conversion efficiency, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Understanding the thermodynamics of radiation and the quantum-mechanical interactions between light and matter is important both for theoretical purposes and for technological advances, such as determining the limits of key processes like light-to-usable-energy conversion efficiencies. In this report, we discuss the physics of these two aspects, considering spontaneous emission as a pathway, and highlight the limitations of such descriptions in assessing energy-harvesting efficiency. In view of these limitations, we adopt a simplified approach to evaluate the free energy of radiation, providing a framework to assess various aspects of light-to-usable-energy conversion efficiencies. Our approach allows a theoretical estimate of the thermodynamic maximum limit for light-to-usable-energy conversion, which is approximately 74%. We validate this free energy estimate by modeling and accurately reproducing the Shockley-Queisser limit (~ 33%), which imposes a practical constraint on solar-to-usable-energy conversion efficiency. Beyond free-energy considerations, our model incorporates various processes, such as spontaneous emission, nonradiative thermal losses, and photon upconversion, allowing us to evaluate their roles. The model further suggests that, under certain conditions, the maximum conversion efficiency can reach approximately 48%, for example with multijunction solar cells or via photon upconversion. These findings further suggest that the true thermodynamic limit for light-to-usable-energy conversion may be much higher (approximately 74%). However, accurately estimating this limit requires a more complete understanding of the thermodynamics of light, light-matter interactions, and the connection between them.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper claims a 74% thermodynamic limit for solar conversion but gives no equations or parameters, so the number cannot be checked.

read the letter

The headline result is a proposed 74% upper bound on light-to-usable-energy conversion derived from a simplified free-energy treatment of radiation. The paper also reproduces the familiar Shockley-Queisser 33% limit as a validation step and sketches how spontaneous emission, non-radiative losses, and upconversion might push practical efficiencies toward 48% in multijunction or upconversion devices. That framing is straightforward and connects several standard ideas in one place, which is useful for readers who want a quick thermodynamic overview rather than a new derivation from scratch. The reproduction of the known 33% figure is the only concrete check supplied, and it works at the level of the abstract. Beyond that, the text supplies no explicit equations, scaling parameters, or step-by-step derivation for the 74% figure. Without those, it is impossible to judge whether the free-energy simplification actually sidesteps the shortcomings the authors attribute to spontaneous-emission models or whether the higher limit is simply an output of the same fitted framework used to recover the Shockley-Queisser result. The circularity risk is real and not minor. The abstract is the only material available here, so any assessment stays provisional. The work is aimed at researchers who track thermodynamic bounds on photovoltaics and might want a compact summary that folds in a few loss channels. It does not yet contain the formal grounding or independent evidence needed for a serious referee process. I would not send it to reviewers in its current form; the central numerical claim needs the missing derivations before it can be evaluated properly.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Free-energy model calibrated to reproduce Shockley-Queisser 33% then extended to 74% thermodynamic limit

specific steps

fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
"We validate this free energy estimate by modeling and accurately reproducing the Shockley-Queisser limit (~ 33%), which imposes a practical constraint on solar-to-usable-energy conversion efficiency. ... Our approach allows a theoretical estimate of the thermodynamic maximum limit for light-to-usable-energy conversion, which is approximately 74%. ... the true thermodynamic limit for light-to-usable-energy conversion may be much higher (approximately 74%)."

The free-energy model is validated by reproducing the established 33% SQ value, indicating that its functional form or parameters are selected to match that known result. The identical model is then used without further external anchoring to produce the new 74% thermodynamic bound, so the higher figure is a direct consequence of the same fitted framework rather than a separate derivation.

full rationale

The paper adopts a simplified free-energy-of-radiation framework and explicitly validates it by showing that the same model reproduces the known Shockley-Queisser limit of ~33%. It then applies the identical framework (including the same free-energy evaluation plus added processes such as upconversion) to derive a higher thermodynamic maximum of ~74%. Because the 74% figure is generated inside the model whose parameters and assumptions were chosen to match the input 33% result, the new claim reduces to an output of the calibrated construction rather than an independent first-principles derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on an unspecified simplified free-energy treatment whose internal parameters and assumptions are not disclosed in the abstract; the only explicit external anchor is reproduction of the Shockley-Queisser limit.

free parameters (1)

free-energy scaling parameters
The simplified approach must contain at least one adjustable quantity to match the known 33% limit before generating the 74% figure.

axioms (1)

domain assumption A simplified free-energy expression for radiation can be written that is independent of the limitations the authors attribute to spontaneous-emission treatments.
Invoked when the paper adopts the simplified approach to obtain the 74% limit.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5567 in / 1451 out tokens · 37790 ms · 2026-05-10T08:38:24.299832+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages

[1]

D. J. Griffiths, and D. F. Schroeter,Introduction to Quantum Mechanics(Cambridge University Press, 3rd edition, 2018)

2018
[2]

P. A. M. Dirac, The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiation, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. A,114, 243 (1927). 10.1098/rspa.1927.0039

work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1927.0039 1927
[3]

P. W. Milonni, Why spontaneous emission?, Am. J. Phys.,52, 340 (1984). 10.1119/1.13886

work page doi:10.1119/1.13886 1984
[4]

Romeira, and A

B. Romeira, and A. Fiore, Purcell Effect in the Stim- ulated and Spontaneous Emission Rates of Nanoscale Semiconductor Lasers, IEEE J. Quantum Electron.,54, 1 (2018). 10.1109/JQE.2018.2802464

work page doi:10.1109/jqe.2018.2802464 2018
[5]

Gea-Banacloche, M

J. Gea-Banacloche, M. O. Scully, and M. S. Zubairy, Vacuum Fluctuations and Spontaneous Emission in Quantum Optics, Phys. Scr.,T21, 81 (1988). 10.1088/0031-8949/1988/T21/015

work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/1988/t21/015 1988
[6]

Beiser,Concepts of Modern Physics(McGraw-Hill, sixth edition, 2003)

A. Beiser,Concepts of Modern Physics(McGraw-Hill, sixth edition, 2003)

2003
[7]

D. S. Lemons, W. R. Shanahan, L. Buchholtz, and M. Gyeviki,On the Trail of Blackbody Radiation: Max Planck and the Physics of His Era(The MIT Press, 2022)

2022
[8]

Johnson,Mathematical Physics of BlackBody Radia- tion(Icarus iDucation, 2012)

C. Johnson,Mathematical Physics of BlackBody Radia- tion(Icarus iDucation, 2012)

2012
[9]

Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields(Cam- bridge University Press, 2005)

S. Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields(Cam- bridge University Press, 2005)

2005
[10]

M. O. Scully, and M. S. Zubairy,Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, 1997)

1997
[11]

Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics(Springer-Verlag, 1993)

H. Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics(Springer-Verlag, 1993)

1993
[12]

Khosravi, and R

H. Khosravi, and R. Loudon, Vacuum field fluctuations and spontaneous emission in the vicinity of a dielectric surface, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci.,433, 337 (1991). 10.1098/rspa.1991.0052

work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1991.0052 1991
[13]

M. A. Weinstein, Thermodynamics of Radiative Emission Processes, Phys. Rev.,119, 499 (1960). 10.1103/PhysRev.119.499

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.119.499 1960
[14]

Kafri, Entropy and Temperature of Electro- magnetic Radiation, Nat

O. Kafri, Entropy and Temperature of Electro- magnetic Radiation, Nat. Sci.,11, 323 (2019). 10.4236/ns.2019.1112035

work page doi:10.4236/ns.2019.1112035 2019
[15]

Rueda, On the irreversible thermophysics of ra- diative processes, Found

A. Rueda, On the irreversible thermophysics of ra- diative processes, Found. Phys.,4, 215 (1974). 10.1007/BF00712688

work page doi:10.1007/bf00712688 1974
[16]

Mauzerall, Thermodynamics of primary pho- tosynthesis, Photosynth

D. Mauzerall, Thermodynamics of primary pho- tosynthesis, Photosynth. Res.,116, 363 (2013). 10.1007/s11120-013-9919-x

work page doi:10.1007/s11120-013-9919-x 2013
[17]

P. T. Landsberg, and G. Tonge, Thermodynamic energy conversion efficiencies, J. Appl. Phys.,51, R1 (1980). 10.1063/1.328187

work page doi:10.1063/1.328187 1980
[18]

S. M. Jeter, Maximum conversion efficiency for the uti- lization of direct solar radiation, Sol. Energy,26, 231 (1981). 10.1016/0038-092X(81)90207-3

work page doi:10.1016/0038-092x(81)90207-3 1981
[19]

Delgado-Bonal, Entropy of radiation: the unseen side of light, Sci

A. Delgado-Bonal, Entropy of radiation: the unseen side of light, Sci. Rep.,7, 1642 (2017). 10.1038/s41598-017- 01622-6

work page doi:10.1038/s41598-017- 2017
[20]

Rueda, Entropy production for a near-equilibrium isolated system of thermalizing matter and radiation, J

A. Rueda, Entropy production for a near-equilibrium isolated system of thermalizing matter and radiation, J. Chem. Phys.,58, 3320 (1973). 10.1063/1.1679658

work page doi:10.1063/1.1679658 1973
[21]

A. D. Kirwan, Intrinsic photon entropy? The dark- side of light, Int. J. Eng. Sci.,42, 725 (2004). 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2003.09.005

work page doi:10.1016/j.ijengsci.2003.09.005 2004
[22]

Ore, Entropy of Radiation, Phys

A. Ore, Entropy of Radiation, Phys. Rev.,98, 887 (1955). 10.1103/PhysRev.98.887

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.98.887 1955
[23]

Rosen, Entropy of Radiation, Phys

P. Rosen, Entropy of Radiation, Phys. Rev.,96, 555 (1954). 10.1103/PhysRev.96.555

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.96.555 1954
[24]

P. W. Atkins, and J. De Paula,Atkins’ Physical Chem- istry(W. H. Freeman, 8th edition, 2006)

2006
[25]

M. J. Moran, and H. N. Shapiro,Fundamentals of En- gineering Thermodynamics, (John Wiley & Sons, 5th edition, 2006)

2006
[26]

Penocchio, R

E. Penocchio, R. Rao, and M. Esposito, Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of light-induced reactions, J. Chem. Phys.,155, 114101 (2021). 10.1063/5.0060774

work page doi:10.1063/5.0060774 2021
[27]

De Vos, and H

A. De Vos, and H. Pauwels, On the thermodynamic limit of photovoltaic energy conversion, Appl. Phys.,25, 119 (1981). 10.1007/BF00901283

work page doi:10.1007/bf00901283 1981
[28]

Juretic, Efficiency of free energy transfer and entropy production in photosynthetic systems, J

D. Juretic, Efficiency of free energy transfer and entropy production in photosynthetic systems, J. Theor. Biol., 106, 315 (1984). 10.1016/0022-5193(84)90033-X

work page doi:10.1016/0022-5193(84)90033-x 1984
[29]

Juretic, and P

D. Juretic, and P. ˇZupanovic, Photosynthetic models with maximum entropy production in irreversible charge transfer steps, Comput. Biol. Chem.,27, 541 (2003). 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2003.09.001

work page doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2003.09.001 2003
[30]

C. D. Andriesse, and M. J. Hollestelle, Minimum en- tropy production in photosynthesis, Biophys. Chem., 90, 249 (2001). 10.1016/S0301-4622(01)00146-6

work page doi:10.1016/s0301-4622(01)00146-6 2001
[31]

R. C. Jennings, E. Engelmann, F. Garlaschi, A. P. Casazza, and G. Zucchelli, Photosynthesis and nega- tive entropy production, BBA Bioenergetics,1709, 251 (2005). 10.1016/j.bbabio.2005.08.004

work page doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2005.08.004 2005
[32]

X. L. Ruan, S. C. Rand, and M. Kaviany, Entropy and efficiency in laser cooling of solids, Phys. Rev. B,75, 214304 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.214304

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.214304 2007
[33]

C. E. Mungan, Thermodynamics of radiation-balanced lasing, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B,20, 1075 (2003). 10.1364/JOSAB.20.001075

work page doi:10.1364/josab.20.001075 2003
[34]

C. E. Mungan, Radiation thermodynamics with appli- cations to lasing and fluorescent cooling, Am. J. Phys., 11 73, 315 (2005). 10.1119/1.1842732

work page doi:10.1119/1.1842732 2005
[35]

M. O. Scully, Laser entropy: from lasers and masers to Bose condensates and black holes, Phys. Scr.,95, 024002 (2020). 10.1088/1402-4896/ab41fc

work page doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ab41fc 2020
[36]

Cuadras, J

A. Cuadras, J. Yao, and M. Quilez, Determination of LEDs degradation with entropy generation rate, J. Appl. Phys.,122, 145702 (2017). 10.1063/1.4996629

work page doi:10.1063/1.4996629 2017
[37]

J. Xue, Z. Li, and R. J. Ram, Irreversible Ther- modynamic Bound for the Efficiency of Light- Emitting Diodes, Phys. Rev. Appl.,8, 014017 (2017). 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.014017

work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.8.014017 2017
[38]

D. S. Lebedev, and L. B. Levitin, Information transmis- sion by electromagnetic field, Inf. Control.,9, 1 (1966). 10.1016/S0019-9958(66)90074-X

work page doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(66)90074-x 1966
[39]

S. E. Harris, Electromagnetically induced transparency and quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. A,94, 053859 (2016). 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.053859

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.94.053859 2016
[40]

S. J. van Enk, and G. Nienhuis, Entropy production and kinetic effects of light, Phys. Rev. A,46, 1438 (1992). 10.1103/PhysRevA.46.1438

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.46.1438 1992
[41]

Santill´ an, G

M. Santill´ an, G. A. de Parga, and F. Angulo- Brown, Black-body radiation and the maximum en- tropy production regime, Eur. J. Phys.,19, 361 (1998). 10.1088/0143-0807/19/4/008

work page doi:10.1088/0143-0807/19/4/008 1998
[42]

, year = 1961, month = mar, journal =

W. Shockley, and H. J. Queisser, Detailed Balance Limit of Efficiency of p-n Junction Solar Cells, J. Appl. Phys., 32, 510 (1961). 10.1063/1.1736034

work page doi:10.1063/1.1736034 1961
[43]

Li, and B

Z. Li, and B. Wei, Surpassing Shockley–Queisser Effi- ciency Limit in Photovoltaic Cells, Nano-micro Lett., 17, 330 (2025). 10.1007/s40820-025-01844-8

work page doi:10.1007/s40820-025-01844-8 2025
[44]

R. M. France, J. F. Geisz, T. Song, W. Olavarria, M. Young, A. Kibbler, and M. A. Steiner, Triple-junction solar cells with 39.5% terrestrial and 34.2% space ef- ficiency enabled by thick quantum well superlattices, Joule, 20226, 1121-1135. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.04.024

work page doi:10.1016/j.joule.2022.04.024 2022
[45]

J. F. Geisz, R. M. France, K. L. Schulte, M. A. Steiner, A. G. Norman, H. L. Guthrey, M. R. Young, T. Song, and T. Moriarty, Six-junction III–V solar cells with 47.1% conversion efficiency under 143-Suns concentra- tion, Nat. Energy, 5, 326 (2020). 10.1038/s41560-020- 0598-5

work page doi:10.1038/s41560-020- 2020
[46]

R. T. Ross, and A. J. Nozik, Efficiency of hot-carrier solar energy converters, J. Appl. Phys.,53, 3813 (1982). 10.1063/1.331124

work page doi:10.1063/1.331124 1982
[47]

De Vos, Detailed balance limit of the efficiency of tandem solar cells, J

A. De Vos, Detailed balance limit of the efficiency of tandem solar cells, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.,13, 839 (1980). 10.1088/0022-3727/13/5/018

work page doi:10.1088/0022-3727/13/5/018 1980
[48]

Loudon,The Quantum Theory of Light, (Oxford Uni- versity Press, 3rd edition, 2000)

R. Loudon,The Quantum Theory of Light, (Oxford Uni- versity Press, 3rd edition, 2000)

2000
[49]

Petela, Exergy of Heat Radiation, J

R. Petela, Exergy of Heat Radiation, J. Heat Transf., 86, 187 (1964). 10.1115/1.3687092

work page doi:10.1115/1.3687092 1964
[50]

Petela, Exergy of undiluted thermal radiation, Sol

R. Petela, Exergy of undiluted thermal radiation, Sol. Energy,74, 469 (2003). 10.1016/S0038-092X(03)00226- 3

work page doi:10.1016/s0038-092x(03)00226- 2003
[51]

Candau, On the exergy of radiation, Sol

Y. Candau, On the exergy of radiation, Sol. Energy,75, 241 (2003). 10.1016/j.solener.2003.07.012

work page doi:10.1016/j.solener.2003.07.012 2003
[53]

T. T. Tsutsui, D. Cius, A. Vidiella-Barranco, A. S. M. de Castro, and F. M. Andrade, Revisiting the Jaynes–Cummings Model with Time-dependent Cou- pling, Braz. J. Phys.,56, 21 (2026). 10.1007/s13538- 025-01949-w

work page doi:10.1007/s13538- 2026
[55]

S. J. D. Phoenix, and P. L. Knight, Fluctuations and entropy in models of quantum optical resonance, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.),186, 381 (1988). 10.1016/0003- 4916(88)90006-1

work page doi:10.1016/0003- 1988
[57]

Kobayashi, Time evolution of the von Neumann entropy in open quantum system, ArXiv:2405.11824 (2024)

K. Kobayashi, Time evolution of the von Neumann entropy in open quantum system, ArXiv:2405.11824 (2024). 10.48550/arXiv.2405.11824

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.11824 2024
[58]

J. A. Anaya-Contreras, H. M. Moya-Cessa, and A. Z´ u˜ niga-Segundo, The von Neumann Entropy for Mixed States, Entropy,21, 49 (2019). 10.3390/e21010049

work page doi:10.3390/e21010049 2019
[59]

V. G. Morozov, and G. R¨ opke, Entropy production in open quantum systems: exactly solvable qubit models, Condens. Matter Phys.,15, 43004 (2012). 10.5488/CMP.15.43004

work page doi:10.5488/cmp.15.43004 2012
[60]

Brune, F

M. Brune, F. Schmidt-Kaler, A. Maali, J. Dreyer, E. Hagley, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Quantum Rabi Oscillation: A Direct Test of Field Quantiza- tion in a Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.,76, 1800 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.1800

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.1800 1996
[61]

M. A. D. Taylor, A. Mandal, and P. Huo, Light–matter interaction Hamiltonians in cavity quantum electro- dynamics, Chem. Phys. Rev.,6, 011305 (2025). 10.1063/5.0225932

work page doi:10.1063/5.0225932 2025
[62]

Vaaranta, M

A. Vaaranta, M. Cattaneo, and P. Muratore- Ginanneschi, Analytical solution of the open dispersive Jaynes-Cummings model and perturbative analytical solution of the open quantum Rabi model, Phys. Rev. A,111, 053717 (2025). 10.1103/PhysRevA.111.053717

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.111.053717 2025
[63]

Islam, and S

N. Islam, and S. Biswas, Generalization of the Einstein coefficients and rate equations under the quantum Rabi oscillation, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.,54, 155301 (2021). 10.1088/1751-8121/abeca9

work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/abeca9 2021
[64]

J. H. Eberly, N. B. Narozhny, and J. J. Sanchez- Mondragon, Periodic Spontaneous Collapse and Revival in a Simple Quantum Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.,44, 1323 (1980). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.1323

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.44.1323 1980
[65]

Kosugi, S

N. Kosugi, S. Matsuo, K. Konno, and N. Hatakenaka, Theory of damped Rabi oscillations, Phys. Rev. B,72, 172509 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.172509

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.172509 2005
[66]

J. G. Peixoto de Faria, and M. C. Nemes, Dissipative dynamics of the Jaynes-Cummings model in the disper- sive approximation: Analytical results, Phys. Rev. A, 59, 3918 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.3918

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.59.3918 1999
[67]

Seke, Extended Jaynes–Cummings model in a damped cavity, J

J. Seke, Extended Jaynes–Cummings model in a damped cavity, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B,2, 1687 (1985). 10.1364/JOSAB.2.001687

work page doi:10.1364/josab.2.001687 1985
[68]

H. A. Hessian, F. A. Mohammed, and A.-B. A. Mo- hamed, Entropy and Entanglement in Master Equation of Effective Hamiltonian for Jaynes–Cummings Model, Commun. Theor. Phys.,51, 723 (2009). 10.1088/0253- 6102/51/4/27

work page doi:10.1088/0253- 2009
[69]

Hasebe, A

K. Hasebe, A. Nakayama, T. Okubo, and M. Yamanoi, Integrodifferential equation in the multimode Jaynes- Cummings model, Phys. Rev. A,106, 062201 (2022). 10.1103/PhysRevA.106.062201 12

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.106.062201 2022
[70]

J. F. Leandro, and F. L. Semi˜ ao, Entanglement in Weisskopf–Wigner theory of atomic decay in free space, Opt. Commun.,282, 4736 (2009). 10.1016/j.optcom.2009.08.059

work page doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2009.08.059 2009
[71]

Quantum master equations: Tips and tricks for quantum optics, quantum computing, and beyond,

F. Campaioli, J. H. Cole, and H. Hapuarachchi, Quan- tum Master Equations: Tips and Tricks for Quantum Optics, Quantum Computing, and Beyond, PRX Quan- tum,5, 020202 (2024). 10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.020202

work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.020202 2024
[72]

Watanabe, and H

A. Watanabe, and H. Nakazato, Exact master equation for an open Jaynes–Cummings system, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.),441, 168890 (2022). 10.1016/j.aop.2022.168890

work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2022.168890 2022
[73]

J. C. C. Capella, A. Fonseca, P. L. Saldanha, and D. Felinto, High-entanglement regimes in the Weisskopf- Wigner theory for spontaneous decay, Phys. Rev. A, 112, 052201 (2025). 10.1103/wmy8-jpvp

work page doi:10.1103/wmy8-jpvp 2025
[74]

Esposito, K

M. Esposito, K. Lindenberg, and C. Van den Broeck, Entropy production as correlation between system and reservoir, New J. Phys.,12, 013013 (2010). 10.1088/1367-2630/12/1/013013

work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/1/013013 2010
[75]

A. S. Trushechkin, On the General Definition of the Production of Entropy in Open Markov Quantum Sys- tems, J. Math. Sci.,241, 191 (2019). 10.1007/s10958- 019-04417-4

work page doi:10.1007/s10958- 2019
[76]

Spohn, Entropy production for quantum dynam- ical semigroups, J

H. Spohn, Entropy production for quantum dynam- ical semigroups, J. Math. Phys.,19, 1227 (1978). 10.1063/1.523789

work page doi:10.1063/1.523789 1978
[78]

Kirton, and J

P. Kirton, and J. Keeling, Suppressing and Restor- ing the Dicke Superradiance Transition by Dephas- ing and Decay, Phys. Rev. Lett., 118, 123602 (2017). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.123602

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.123602 2017
[79]

Tiwari, and S

D. Tiwari, and S. Banerjee, Quantum chaos in the Dicke model and its variants, Proc. R. Soc. A,479, 20230431 (2023). 10.1098/rspa.2023.0431

work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2023.0431 2023
[80]

S. Wolf, S. Richter, J. von Zanthier, and F. Schmidt- Kaler, Light of Two Atoms in Free Space: Bunching or Antibunching?, Phys. Rev. Lett.,124, 063603 (2020). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.063603

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.063603 2020
[81]

Richter, S

S. Richter, S. Wolf, J. von Zanthier, and F. Schmidt- Kaler, Collective photon emission of two correlated atoms in free space, Phys. Rev. Research,5, 013163 (2023). 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.013163

work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.013163 2023
[82]

Roffe, D

S. M¨ ahrlein, L. G¨ otzend¨ orfer, K. G¨ unthner, J. Ev- ers, and J. von Zanthier, Birth, death, and revival of spontaneous emission in a three-atom system, Phys. Rev. Research,2, 013278 (2020). 10.1103/PhysRevRe- search.2.013278

work page doi:10.1103/physrevre- 2020
[83]

R. H. Lehmberg, Radiation from an N-Atom System. II. Spontaneous Emission from a Pair of Atoms, Phys. Rev. A,2, 889 (1970). 10.1103/PhysRevA.2.889

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.2.889 1970
[84]

Md. M. Ali, W.-M. Huang, and W.-M. Zhang, Quantum thermodynamics of single particle systems, Sci. Rep., 10, 13500 (2020). 10.1038/s41598-020-70450-y

work page doi:10.1038/s41598-020-70450-y 2020

Showing first 80 references.