arxiv: 2604.15215 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · 💻 cs.RO

Recognition: unknown

A Hierarchical Spatiotemporal Action Tokenizer for In-Context Imitation Learning in Robotics

Fawad Javed Fateh , Ali Shah Ali , Murad Popattia , Usman Nizamani , Andrey Konin , M. Zeeshan Zia , Quoc-Huy Tran

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 10:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO

keywords action tokenizerin-context imitation learningroboticsvector quantizationhierarchical clusteringspatiotemporalrobotic manipulationbenchmark evaluation

0 comments

The pith

A two-level hierarchical spatiotemporal action tokenizer produces better tokens for in-context robotic imitation learning by clustering actions and recovering timestamps.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a hierarchical spatiotemporal action tokenizer that applies two successive levels of vector quantization to robot actions. The lower level creates fine-grained subclusters while the higher level maps them into coarser clusters, and the method also reconstructs the original actions along with their timestamps to capture both spatial and temporal structure. This HiST-AT approach outperforms non-hierarchical tokenizers and delivers stronger results than prior methods on multiple simulation and real-world robotic manipulation benchmarks. A reader would care because more effective action tokenization could allow robots to learn new tasks from limited in-context demonstrations without extensive retraining.

Core claim

The paper claims that a hierarchical tokenizer built from two successive vector quantizations, extended to jointly recover input actions and their timestamps, generates action representations that improve downstream in-context imitation learning performance compared with non-hierarchical baselines, as shown by superior results across simulation and real robotic benchmarks.

What carries the argument

The HiST-AT hierarchical spatiotemporal action tokenizer, which performs multi-level vector quantization on actions while reconstructing both the actions and their associated timestamps.

Load-bearing premise

The two successive levels of vector quantization plus timestamp recovery must yield action tokens that improve imitation learning performance beyond what simpler single-level or non-temporal tokenizers can achieve.

What would settle it

An ablation experiment on the same benchmarks in which a non-hierarchical tokenizer or a version without timestamp recovery matches or exceeds the reported performance of the full HiST-AT method.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15215 by Ali Shah Ali, Andrey Konin, Fawad Javed Fateh, Murad Popattia, M. Zeeshan Zia, Quoc-Huy Tran, Usman Nizamani.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: An overview of our hierarchical spatiotemporal action tokenizer (HiST-AT). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We present a novel hierarchical spatiotemporal action tokenizer for in-context imitation learning. We first propose a hierarchical approach, which consists of two successive levels of vector quantization. In particular, the lower level assigns input actions to fine-grained subclusters, while the higher level further maps fine-grained subclusters to clusters. Our hierarchical approach outperforms the non-hierarchical counterpart, while mainly exploiting spatial information by reconstructing input actions. Furthermore, we extend our approach by utilizing both spatial and temporal cues, forming a hierarchical spatiotemporal action tokenizer, namely HiST-AT. Specifically, our hierarchical spatiotemporal approach conducts multi-level clustering, while simultaneously recovering input actions and their associated timestamps. Finally, extensive evaluations on multiple simulation and real robotic manipulation benchmarks show that our approach establishes a new state-of-the-art performance in in-context imitation learning.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper's hierarchical spatiotemporal action tokenizer shows some gains over flat versions on robot manipulation tasks, but the experiments do not clearly isolate whether the hierarchy and timestamp recovery are what drive the in-context imitation improvements.

read the letter

The core idea is a two-level vector quantization scheme for robot actions that also reconstructs timestamps alongside the actions themselves. They apply this to in-context imitation learning and report better results than a non-hierarchical baseline plus SOTA numbers on several simulation and real-robot manipulation benchmarks. That combination of hierarchy plus explicit temporal reconstruction is the main novelty relative to standard VQ approaches in the imitation literature. The real-robot evaluations are a practical plus for this kind of work. The paper does a reasonable job laying out the tokenizer architecture and showing that the full version beats the spatial-only hierarchical version on their tasks. The experiments cover multiple environments, which helps credibility for a robotics paper. The soft spot is the attribution. The central claim requires that the two-level structure and timestamp recovery produce tokens that specifically help the in-context mechanism, not just that overall reconstruction is better. The abstract states the hierarchical version outperforms the non-hierarchical one and that the spatiotemporal version reaches SOTA, but without detailed ablations that hold reconstruction quality constant while varying only the hierarchy or the temporal component, it is hard to know how much of the downstream gain comes from those choices versus other factors like the base policy or dataset. If the gains shrink or disappear under a simpler tokenizer with matched reconstruction error, the load-bearing part of the argument weakens. This paper is aimed at researchers working on action tokenization and in-context methods for robot imitation learning. Readers who care about practical discretization schemes for few-shot adaptation will find the method and the benchmark results useful. It is coherent enough on its own terms to deserve a serious referee, even though the evidence for the specific design choices would need tightening in revision. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes HiST-AT, a hierarchical spatiotemporal action tokenizer for in-context imitation learning in robotics. It employs two successive levels of vector quantization (fine-grained subclusters at the lower level mapped to coarser clusters at the higher level) to discretize actions while primarily exploiting spatial structure, and extends this to a spatiotemporal version that jointly recovers actions and their timestamps via multi-level clustering. The authors claim the hierarchical version outperforms its non-hierarchical counterpart and that the full HiST-AT establishes new state-of-the-art results on multiple simulation and real-world robotic manipulation benchmarks.

Significance. If the performance gains are shown to stem specifically from the hierarchical clustering structure and temporal recovery (rather than reconstruction fidelity or other factors), the work could meaningfully advance action tokenization for transformer-based in-context imitation learning, offering a structured way to handle continuous control signals that may improve generalization across tasks.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the hierarchical spatiotemporal tokenizer 'establishes a new state-of-the-art performance in in-context imitation learning' is load-bearing, yet the abstract supplies no quantitative results, ablation numbers, baseline details, or error bars; without these, it is impossible to confirm that the two-level VQ plus timestamp recovery drives downstream in-context gains beyond what a flat VQ or spatial-only tokenizer would achieve.
[Method] The description of the hierarchical approach (lower-level fine-grained subclusters mapped to higher-level clusters) and its extension to spatiotemporal tokenization must include controlled ablations that isolate the contribution of hierarchy and temporal cues to in-context learning performance; if gains largely disappear under equivalent reconstruction quality with simpler tokenizers, the attribution to the proposed structure fails.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract introduces HiST-AT without spelling out the acronym on first use; a brief parenthetical expansion would improve readability.
[Method] Notation for the two quantization levels and the joint action-timestamp reconstruction objective could be formalized with equations to make the multi-level clustering process precise.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We have revised the paper to address the concerns raised in the major comments, as detailed in the point-by-point responses below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the hierarchical spatiotemporal tokenizer 'establishes a new state-of-the-art performance in in-context imitation learning' is load-bearing, yet the abstract supplies no quantitative results, ablation numbers, baseline details, or error bars; without these, it is impossible to confirm that the two-level VQ plus timestamp recovery drives downstream in-context gains beyond what a flat VQ or spatial-only tokenizer would achieve.

Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from quantitative support for the central claims. In the revised manuscript, we have updated the abstract to include key performance metrics (e.g., average success rate improvements over baselines on simulation and real-world benchmarks), references to ablation results, and mention of error bars from multiple runs. This provides immediate substantiation that the hierarchical spatiotemporal design contributes to the reported gains. revision: yes
Referee: [Method] The description of the hierarchical approach (lower-level fine-grained subclusters mapped to higher-level clusters) and its extension to spatiotemporal tokenization must include controlled ablations that isolate the contribution of hierarchy and temporal cues to in-context learning performance; if gains largely disappear under equivalent reconstruction quality with simpler tokenizers, the attribution to the proposed structure fails.

Authors: We appreciate the call for more rigorous isolation of contributions. The original manuscript already reports that the hierarchical tokenizer outperforms its non-hierarchical counterpart and presents results for the spatiotemporal extension. To directly address the request, we have added controlled ablation studies in the revised version. These experiments hold reconstruction quality constant across variants (flat VQ, spatial-only, and hierarchical spatiotemporal) and demonstrate that the performance improvements in in-context imitation learning persist specifically due to the two-level hierarchy and joint action-timestamp recovery, rather than reconstruction fidelity alone. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected in derivation or claims

full rationale

The paper proposes an explicit hierarchical two-level vector quantization tokenizer (lower level for fine subclusters, higher for clusters) extended to spatiotemporal recovery of actions and timestamps. Performance claims rest on empirical benchmark evaluations comparing hierarchical vs. non-hierarchical versions and against prior methods, with no mathematical derivation, first-principles prediction, or fitted parameter renamed as output. No self-citation load-bearing steps, ansatz smuggling, or self-definitional reductions appear in the abstract or described method. The approach is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only view prevents identification of concrete free parameters or axioms. Likely candidates include codebook sizes, number of hierarchy levels, and loss weighting between reconstruction and clustering, but none are stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5462 in / 1056 out tokens · 21038 ms · 2026-05-10T10:44:01.829599+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

[1]

Mandlekar, D

A. Mandlekar, D. Xu, J. Wong, S. Nasiriany, C. Wang, R. Kulkarni, L. Fei-Fei, S. Savarese, Y . Zhu, and R. Mart´ın-Mart´ın. What matters in learning from offline human demonstrations for robot manipulation. InCoRL, 2021

2021
[2]

O. M. Team, D. Ghosh, H. Walke, K. Pertsch, K. Black, O. Mees, S. Dasari, J. Hejna, T. Kreiman, C. Xu, et al. Octo: An open-source generalist robot policy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12213, 2024

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024
[3]

Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models: Open x- embodiment collaboration 0

O’Neill et al. Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models: Open x- embodiment collaboration 0. InICRA, 2024

2024
[4]

Khazatsky et al

A. Khazatsky et al. DROID: A large-scale in-the-wild robot manipulation dataset. InRSS, 2024

2024
[5]

Brown, B

T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, et al. Language models are few-shot learners.NeurIPS, 2020

2020
[6]

Mirchandani, F

S. Mirchandani, F. Xia, P. Florence, B. Ichter, D. Driess, M. G. Arenas, K. Rao, D. Sadigh, and A. Zeng. Large language models as general pattern machines. InConference on Robot Learning, pages 2498–2518. PMLR, 2023

2023
[7]

V osylius and E

V . V osylius and E. Johns. Few-shot in-context imitation learning via implicit graph alignment. InCoRL, 2023

2023
[8]

T. Kwon, N. Di Palo, and E. Johns. Language models as zero-shot trajectory generators.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2024

2024
[9]

V osylius and E

V . V osylius and E. Johns. Instant policy: In-context imitation learning via graph diffusion. In ICLR, 2025

2025
[10]

and Johns, E

N. Di Palo and E. Johns. Keypoint action tokens enable in-context imitation learning in robotics.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.19578, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[11]

R+ x: Retrieval and execution from everyday human videos

G. Papagiannis, N. Di Palo, P. Vitiello, and E. Johns. R+ x: Retrieval and execution from everyday human videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.12957, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[12]

Y . Yin, Z. Wang, Y . Sharma, D. Niu, T. Darrell, and R. Herzig. In-context learning enables robot action prediction in llms.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.12782, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[13]

L. Fu, H. Huang, G. Datta, L. Y . Chen, W. C.-H. Panitch, F. Liu, H. Li, and K. Goldberg. In- context imitation learning via next-token prediction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.15980, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[14]

Zhang, S

X. Zhang, S. Liu, P. Huang, W. J. Han, Y . Lyu, M. Xu, and D. Zhao. Dynamics as prompts: In-context learning for sim-to-real system identifications.RA-L, 2025

2025
[15]

C. F. Park, A. Lee, E. S. Lubana, Y . Yang, M. Okawa, K. Nishi, M. Wattenberg, and H. Tanaka. In-context learning of representations. InICLR, 2025. 9

2025
[16]

X. Wang, W. Zhu, M. Saxon, M. Steyvers, and W. Y . Wang. Large language models are latent variable models: Explaining and finding good demonstrations for in-context learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:15614–15638, 2023

2023
[17]

RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scale

A. Brohan, N. Brown, J. Carbajal, Y . Chebotar, J. Dabis, C. Finn, K. Gopalakrishnan, K. Haus- man, A. Herzog, J. Hsu, et al. Rt-1: Robotics transformer for real-world control at scale.arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.06817, 2022

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022
[18]

N. M. Shafiullah, Z. Cui, A. A. Altanzaya, and L. Pinto. Behavior transformers: Cloningk modes with one stone.NeurIPS, 2022

2022
[19]

T. Zhao, V . Kumar, S. Levine, and C. Finn. Learning fine-grained bimanual manipulation with low-cost hardware.RSS, 2023

2023
[20]

Huang, Y

P. Huang, Y . Hu, N. Nechyporenko, D. Kim, W. Talbott, and J. Zhang. Emotion: Expressive motion sequence generation for humanoid robots with in-context learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.23234, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[21]

M. J. Kim, K. Pertsch, S. Karamcheti, T. Xiao, A. Balakrishna, S. Nair, R. Rafailov, E. Foster, G. Lam, P. Sanketi, et al. Openvla: An open-source vision-language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09246, 2024

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024
[22]

FAST: Efficient Action Tokenization for Vision-Language-Action Models

K. Pertsch, K. Stachowicz, B. Ichter, D. Driess, S. Nair, Q. Vuong, O. Mees, C. Finn, and S. Levine. Fast: Efficient action tokenization for vision-language-action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09747, 2025

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[23]

A. Vaswani. Attention is all you need.NeurIPS, 2017

2017
[24]

L. Yu, J. Lezama, N. B. Gundavarapu, L. Versari, K. Sohn, D. Minnen, Y . Cheng, A. Gupta, X. Gu, A. G. Hauptmann, et al. Language model beats diffusion-tokenizer is key to visual generation. InICLR, 2024

2024
[25]

Bharadhwaj, J

H. Bharadhwaj, J. Vakil, M. Sharma, A. Gupta, S. Tulsiani, and V . Kumar. Roboagent: Gener- alization and efficiency in robot manipulation via semantic augmentations and action chunking. InICRA, 2024

2024
[26]

Mysore, B

S. Mysore, B. Mabsout, R. Mancuso, and K. Saenko. Regularizing action policies for smooth control with reinforcement learning. InICRA, 2021

2021
[27]

A. D. Vuong, M. N. Vu, D. An, and I. Reid. Action tokenizer matters in in-context imita- tion learning. In2025 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 13490–13496. IEEE, 2025

2025
[28]

Van Den Oord, O

A. Van Den Oord, O. Vinyals, et al. Neural discrete representation learning.NeurIPS, 2017

2017
[29]

Kukleva, H

A. Kukleva, H. Kuehne, F. Sener, and J. Gall. Unsupervised learning of action classes with continuous temporal embedding. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 12066–12074, 2019

2019
[30]

R. G. VidalMata, W. J. Scheirer, A. Kukleva, D. Cox, and H. Kuehne. Joint visual-temporal embedding for unsupervised learning of actions in untrimmed sequences. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pages 1238–1247, 2021

2021
[31]

Spurio, E

F. Spurio, E. Bahrami, G. Francesca, and J. Gall. Hierarchical vector quantization for unsuper- vised action segmentation. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 39, pages 6996–7005, 2025

2025
[32]

G ¨okay, F

U. G ¨okay, F. Spurio, D. R. Bach, and J. Gall. Skeleton motion words for unsupervised skeleton- based temporal action segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Confer- ence on Computer Vision, pages 12101–12111, 2025. 10

2025
[33]

Nasiriany, A

S. Nasiriany, A. Maddukuri, L. Zhang, A. Parikh, A. Lo, A. Joshi, A. Mandlekar, and Y . Zhu. Robocasa: Large-scale simulation of household tasks for generalist robots. InRSS, 2024

2024
[34]

S. Tao, F. Xiang, A. Shukla, Y . Qin, X. Hinrichsen, X. Yuan, C. Bao, X. Lin, Y . Liu, T.-k. Chan, et al. Maniskill3: Gpu parallelized robotics simulation and rendering for generalizable embodied ai.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.00425, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[35]

S. Wang, J. You, Y . Hu, J. Li, and Y . Gao. Skil: Semantic keypoint imitation learning for generalizable data-efficient manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.14400, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[36]

Caron, H

M. Caron, H. Touvron, I. Misra, H. J ´egou, J. Mairal, P. Bojanowski, and A. Joulin. Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF interna- tional conference on computer vision, pages 9650–9660, 2021

2021
[37]

M. Xu, Z. Xu, Y . Xu, C. Chi, G. Wetzstein, M. Veloso, and S. Song. Flow as the cross-domain manipulation interface. InCoRL, 2024

2024
[38]

Chandak, G

Y . Chandak, G. Theocharous, J. Kostas, S. Jordan, and P. Thomas. Learning action represen- tations for reinforcement learning. InICML, 2019

2019
[39]

P. Zech, E. Renaudo, S. Haller, X. Zhang, and J. Piater. Action representations in robotics: A taxonomy and systematic classification.IJRR, 2019

2019
[40]

Watson and J

J. Watson and J. Peters. Inferring smooth control: Monte carlo posterior policy iteration with gaussian processes. InCoRL, 2023

2023
[41]

Styrud, M

J. Styrud, M. Mayr, E. Hellsten, V . Krueger, and C. Smith. Bebop-combining reactive planning and bayesian optimization to solve robotic manipulation tasks. InICRA, 2024

2024
[42]

Kumar, S

S. Kumar, S. Haresh, A. Ahmed, A. Konin, M. Z. Zia, and Q.-H. Tran. Unsupervised action segmentation by joint representation learning and online clustering. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 20174– 20185, 2022

2022
[43]

Q.-H. Tran, A. Mehmood, M. Ahmed, M. Naufil, A. Zafar, A. Konin, and Z. Zia. Permutation- aware activity segmentation via unsupervised frame-to-segment alignment. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pages 6426–6436, 2024

2024
[44]

Xu and S

M. Xu and S. Gould. Temporally consistent unbalanced optimal transport for unsupervised action segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 14618–14627, 2024

2024
[45]

A. S. Ali, S. A. Mahmood, M. Saeed, A. Konin, M. Z. Zia, and Q.-H. Tran. Joint self- supervised video alignment and action segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF In- ternational Conference on Computer Vision, pages 10807–10818, 2025

2025
[46]

T. W. Ayalew, X. Zhang, K. Y . Wu, T. Jiang, M. Maire, and M. R. Walter. Progressor: A perceptually guided reward estimator with self-supervised online refinement. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 10297–10306, 2025

2025
[47]

Y . Chen, Y . Ge, W. Tang, Y . Li, Y . Ge, M. Ding, Y . Shan, and X. Liu. Moto: Latent motion token as the bridging language for learning robot manipulation from videos. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 19752–19763, 2025

2025
[48]

Guo, Y .-C

J.-T. Guo, Y .-C. Chen, P.-C. Hsieh, K.-H. Ho, P.-W. Huang, T.-R. Wu, and I.-C. Wu. Learning human-like rl agents through trajectory optimization with action quantization. InThe Thirty- ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2025. 11

2025
[49]

K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. InCVPR, 2016

2016
[50]

Radford, J

A. Radford, J. W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agarwal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervi- sion. InICML, 2021

2021
[51]

Jiang, Y

G. Jiang, Y . Sun, T. Huang, H. Li, Y . Liang, and H. Xu. Robots pre-train robots: Manipulation- centric robotic representation from large-scale robot dataset. InICLR, 2025

2025
[52]

Mandlekar, S

A. Mandlekar, S. Nasiriany, B. Wen, I. Akinola, Y . Narang, L. Fan, Y . Zhu, and D. Fox. Mimicgen: A data generation system for scalable robot learning using human demonstrations. InCoRL, 2023. 12

2023