pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15476 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Quantum-Well-Metasurface to Maximize Nonlinear Polarization

Pernille Undrum Fathi , Irene Occhiodori , Patrick Devaney , Amberly Ricks , Rithvik Ramesh , Yiwei Ju , Moaz Waqar , Theodore P. Letsou
show 7 more authors
Christina M. Sp\"agele Hyunseung Jung Igal Brener Xiaoqing Pan Marcus Ossiander Seth R. Bank Federico Capasso
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 09:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords nonlinear opticsmetasurfacequantum wellsecond-order nonlinearityGaAs heterostructurefrequency conversioninterband transitiondielectric metasurface
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

A metasurface patterned on an engineered GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructure boosts the effective second-order nonlinearity to about 14 nm/V.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that combining bandstructure engineering in a quantum-well heterostructure with a dielectric metasurface can produce large effective nonlinearities for frequency conversion. A reader would care because weak nonlinear responses currently hinder compact devices needed for telecommunications and quantum technologies. The approach first creates a resonant interband transition yielding 1.6 nm/V, then uses the metasurface to make this accessible in free space and enhance it to roughly 14 nm/V. This simultaneously tailors the material response and optimizes the internal electromagnetic field, offering a path to efficient miniaturized nonlinear photonic components.

Core claim

By engineering a resonant interband transition in a GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructure, a second-order nonlinear tensor element of 1.6 nm/V is realized at 1.57 um wavelength. Patterning a high quality factor dielectric metasurface on the material makes the nonlinearity free-space-accessible and increases the effective nonlinearity to approximately 14 nm/V. The proof-of-concept shows that interband transition engineering combined with metasurfaces can deliver giant effective nonlinearities in the near-infrared to visible range, addressing constraints in nonlinear photonics.

What carries the argument

The resonant interband transition in the bandstructure-engineered GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructure, made accessible and enhanced by a high-Q dielectric metasurface that optimizes the electromagnetic field within the structure.

If this is right

  • Compact and efficient nonlinear frequency converters become feasible for near-infrared and visible wavelengths.
  • Scalable fabrication of devices that overcome miniaturization barriers in nonlinear photonics.
  • Access to otherwise unusable nonlinear tensor elements through metasurface patterning.
  • Potential for integration into telecommunications and quantum computation systems with reduced size and power requirements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar engineering could extend to other semiconductor heterostructures for different operating wavelengths.
  • The technique might enable lower thresholds for nonlinear processes, reducing required input powers in applications.
  • Integration with photonic circuits could follow if the metasurface pattern is compatible with waveguide designs.
  • Further optimization of the quality factor or pattern geometry could yield even larger enhancements.

Load-bearing premise

The observed increase in effective nonlinearity to 14 nm/V results primarily from the designed metasurface field enhancement and the engineered interband transition rather than from fabrication imperfections, material losses, or unaccounted experimental variables.

What would settle it

Detailed measurements of the local field intensity enhancement inside the heterostructure under the metasurface, or a control experiment without the metasurface pattern showing no such boost, or full error bars demonstrating the 14 nm/V value is within uncertainty of the base 1.6 nm/V.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15476 by Amberly Ricks, Christina M. Sp\"agele, Federico Capasso, Hyunseung Jung, Igal Brener, Irene Occhiodori, Marcus Ossiander, Moaz Waqar, Patrick Devaney, Pernille Undrum Fathi, Rithvik Ramesh, Seth R. Bank, Theodore P. Letsou, Xiaoqing Pan, Yiwei Ju.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Tailoring all components of the second-order polarization. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructure properties. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Metasurface design and device simulations. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Measured nonlinear device response. a Experimental pump-incidence-angle-resolved second har￾monic spectra measured at a pump power of 41 mW. The second harmonic maxima follow the angular evolution of the GMR branches (compare with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Characterization of the substrate transferred heterostructure. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Schematic of the optical setup for device characterization. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Incidence angle-resolved transmission spectra of the metasurface for x-polarized illumi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Nonlinear response of the metasurface/heterostructure sample and the bare heterostruc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Substrate transfer. The sample is grown via molecular beam epitaxy and subsequently flip-chip bonded to a 500-µm thick sapphire substrate using 353ND EPO-TEK epoxy resin. Mechanical lapping is used for the first stage of the GaAs substrate removal, followed by a wet etch removal of the remaining GaAs substrate and the etch-stop layers. 22 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Metasurface fabrication. Positive-tone E-Beam resist is spin coated on the surface of the het￾erostructure and exposed using electron beam lithography. The exposed resist is removed using developer and the gaps are filled with TiO2 by atomic layer deposition. The overgrown TiO2 is removed by reactive ion etching, and the remaining resist is removed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Measured and modeled sum-frequency spectra. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Nonlinear frequency conversion unlocks technologies ranging from telecommunications to quantum computation; however, weak nonlinearities and architectures that resist miniaturization currently limit devices. Here, we combine a bandstructure-engineered GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructure with a high quality factor dielectric metasurface to simultaneously tailor the intrinsic nonlinear susceptibility and optimize the electromagnetic field within the heterostructure. By engineering a resonant interband transition, we realize a large second-order nonlinear tensor element, 1.6 nm/V at 1.57 um wavelength. We then make it free-space-accessible and boost the effective nonlinearity to ~ 14 nm/V using a metasurface patterned on the material. Our proof-of-concept experiment establishes that interband transition engineering and metasurfaces accessing otherwise unusable nonlinear tensor elements enable giant effective nonlinearities in the near-infrared to visible spectrum. This addresses material and device-level constraints in nonlinear photonics, providing a scalable route to compact, efficient devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that by engineering a resonant interband transition in a GaAs/AlGaAs quantum-well heterostructure, a large second-order nonlinear tensor element of 1.6 nm/V is realized at 1.57 μm; patterning a high-Q dielectric metasurface on the material then renders this response free-space accessible and boosts the effective nonlinearity to ~14 nm/V, as demonstrated in a proof-of-concept experiment.

Significance. If the reported values and their attribution to the combined interband engineering plus metasurface enhancement hold after detailed verification, the work would offer a scalable route to giant effective nonlinearities in the near-IR/visible range, directly addressing miniaturization and efficiency limits in nonlinear photonics devices.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central experimental claims (1.6 nm/V intrinsic and ~14 nm/V effective) are stated without any supporting data, figures, error bars, or methods details, so the support for the claims cannot be assessed.
  2. [Results/Methods] Results/Methods (conversion from SHG): the extraction of d_eff ~14 nm/V relies on simulated local-field enhancement, mode overlap, and Q-factor without reported reference SHG measurements on unpatterned regions of the same wafer, error propagation, or sensitivity analysis to discrepancies between simulated and actual field distributions; this leaves open alternative explanations such as fabrication variations or calibration offsets.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: wavelength notation alternates between '1.57 um' and '1.57 μm'; standardize throughout.
  2. [Throughout] Throughout: clarify whether the reported tensor element is d or χ^(2) and confirm the unit conversion (nm/V is used but is 1000× larger than typical pm/V values).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments identify opportunities to improve the clarity of our central claims and the rigor of our data analysis. We address each point below and describe the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central experimental claims (1.6 nm/V intrinsic and ~14 nm/V effective) are stated without any supporting data, figures, error bars, or methods details, so the support for the claims cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, being a concise summary, does not itself contain the supporting data or references. The full manuscript includes the relevant SHG spectra, metasurface characterization, and extraction procedures in the Results and Methods sections. To address the concern directly, we will revise the abstract to include brief references to the key figures and supplementary sections that present the experimental data, error estimates, and methods supporting the reported values of 1.6 nm/V and ~14 nm/V. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results/Methods] Results/Methods (conversion from SHG): the extraction of d_eff ~14 nm/V relies on simulated local-field enhancement, mode overlap, and Q-factor without reported reference SHG measurements on unpatterned regions of the same wafer, error propagation, or sensitivity analysis to discrepancies between simulated and actual field distributions; this leaves open alternative explanations such as fabrication variations or calibration offsets.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current presentation of the d_eff extraction would benefit from additional validation steps. In the revised manuscript we will add reference SHG measurements performed on unpatterned regions of the identical wafer to establish a direct experimental baseline. We will also incorporate a full error-propagation analysis and a sensitivity study that quantifies the effect of plausible deviations between simulated and measured local-field distributions, Q-factors, and mode overlaps. These additions will allow us to assess and exclude alternative explanations such as fabrication variations or calibration offsets, thereby strengthening the attribution of the observed enhancement to the metasurface. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental claims rest on measurements, not self-referential derivations

full rationale

The paper reports fabrication and optical characterization of a GaAs/AlGaAs quantum-well heterostructure patterned with a dielectric metasurface. Its central claims (realization of 1.6 nm/V intrinsic nonlinearity at 1.57 µm via interband engineering, followed by an effective ~14 nm/V via metasurface enhancement) are presented as direct experimental outcomes from second-harmonic generation measurements. No derivation chain, predictive equations, or first-principles calculations are described that reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes; the results are obtained from physical samples and are subject to external verification or falsification. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for the reported values.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard principles of semiconductor bandstructure engineering and electromagnetic metasurface design from prior literature, with no new free parameters, axioms beyond domain standards, or invented entities introduced.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Established models of second-order nonlinear susceptibility in III-V semiconductors and resonant interband transitions
    The paper invokes known physics of GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructures and nonlinear optics without deriving them.
  • domain assumption High-Q dielectric metasurfaces can enhance local fields without prohibitive losses in the near-IR
    Assumed for the field optimization step.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5524 in / 1360 out tokens · 54696 ms · 2026-05-10T09:49:20.549631+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P., Vaskin, A., Reno, J

    Liu, S., Vabishchevich, P. P., Vaskin, A., Reno, J. L., Keeler, G. A., Sinclair, M. B., Staude, I. & Brener, I. An all-dielectric metasurface as a broadband optical frequency mixer. Nature Communi- cations 9, 2507. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04944-9 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04944-9 2018

  2. [2]

    & Meng, H

    Wu, Q., Peng, L., Huang, Z., Liu, X., Luo, M., Gao, D. & Meng, H. Advancements in ultrafast photonics: confluence of nonlinear optics and intelligent strategies. Light: Science & Applications 14, 97. doi: 10.1038/s41377-024-01732-7 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41377-024-01732-7 2025

  3. [3]

    & Van, V

    Saghaei, H. & Van, V. Broadband mid-infrared supercontinuum generation in dispersion-engineered silicon-on-insulator waveguide. Journal of the Optical Society of America B 36, A193. doi:10.1364/ JOSAB.36.00A193 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    & Fejer, M

    Jankowski, M., Langrock, C., Desiatov, B., Lončar, M. & Fejer, M. M. Supercontinuum generation by saturated second-order nonlinear interactions. APL Photonics 8, 116104. doi: 10.1063/5.0158926 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0158926 2023

  5. [5]

    & Bowers, J

    Chang, L., Liu, S. & Bowers, J. E. Integrated optical frequency comb technologies. Nature Photonics 16, 95–108. doi: 10.1038/s41566-021-00945-1 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-021-00945-1 2022

  6. [6]

    & Dai, D.-X

    Pan, B.-C., Liu, H.-X., Xu, H.-C., Huang, Y.-S., Li, H., Yu, Z.-J., Liu, L., Shi, Y.-C. & Dai, D.-X. Ultra-compact lithium niobate microcavity electro-optic modulator beyond 110 GHz. Chip 1, 100029. doi:10.1016/j.chip.2022.100029 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chip.2022.100029 2022

  7. [7]

    Quantum Pair Generation in Nonlinear Metasurfaces with Mixed and Pure Photon Polarizations

    Noh, J., Santiago-Cruz, T., Sultanov, V., Doiron, C. F., Gennaro, S. D., Chekhova, M. V. & Brener, I. Quantum Pair Generation in Nonlinear Metasurfaces with Mixed and Pure Photon Polarizations. Nano Letters 24, 15356–15362. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c04398 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c04398 2024

  8. [8]

    D., Mitrofanov, O., Addamane, S., Reno, J., Brener, I

    Santiago-Cruz, T., Gennaro, S. D., Mitrofanov, O., Addamane, S., Reno, J., Brener, I. & Chekhova, M. V. Resonant metasurfaces for generating complex quantum states. Science 377, 991–995. doi:10. 1126/science.abq8684 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    & Guo, G.-C

    Zhang, C., Huang, Y.-F., Liu, B.-H., Li, C.-F. & Guo, G.-C. Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion Sources for Multiphoton Experiments. Advanced Quantum Technologies 4, 2000132. doi: 10.1002/ qute.202000132 (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    & Tang, H

    Yang, F., Lu, J., Shen, M., Yang, G. & Tang, H. X. Symmetric second-harmonic generation in sub-wavelength periodically poled thin film lithium niobate. Optica 11, 1050–1055. doi: 10.1364/ OPTICA.527236 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    & Lončar, M

    Wang, C., Xiong, X., Andrade, N., Venkataraman, V., Ren, X.-F., Guo, G.-C. & Lončar, M. Second harmonic generation in nano-structured thin-film lithium niobate waveguides. Optics Express 25, 6963–6973. doi: 10.1364/OE.25.006963 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.25.006963 2017

  12. [12]

    B., Schurig, D

    Pendry, J. B., Schurig, D. & Smith, D. R. Controlling Electromagnetic Fields. Science 312, 1780–

    work page

  13. [13]

    doi: 10.1126/science.1125907 (2006)

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1125907 2006

  14. [14]

    and Aieta, Francesco and Tetienne, Jean-Philippe and Capasso, Federico and Gaburro, Zeno , month = oct, year =

    Yu, N., Genevet, P., Kats, M. A., Aieta, F., Tetienne, J.-P., Capasso, F. & Gaburro, Z. Light Propagation with Phase Discontinuities: Generalized Laws of Reflection and Refraction. Science 334, 333–337. doi: 10.1126/science.1210713 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1210713 2011

  15. [15]

    & Capasso, F

    Yu, N. & Capasso, F. Flat optics with designer metasurfaces. Nature Materials 13, 139–150. doi: 10. 1038/nmat3839 (2014)

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    T., Zhu, A

    Chen, W. T., Zhu, A. Y. & Capasso, F. Flat optics with dispersion-engineered metasurfaces. Nature Reviews Materials 5, 604–620. doi: 10.1038/s41578-020-0203-3 (2020). 15

    work page doi:10.1038/s41578-020-0203-3 2020

  17. [17]

    & Rho, J

    Jung, C., Lee, E. & Rho, J. The rise of electrically tunable metasurfaces. Science Advances 10, eado8964. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ado8964 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.ado8964 2024

  18. [18]

    Abdelraouf, O. A. M., Wang, Z., Liu, H., Dong, Z., Wang, Q., Ye, M., Wang, X. R., Wang, Q. J. & Liu, H. Recent Advances in Tunable Metasurfaces: Materials, Design, and Applications. ACS Nano 16, 13339–13369. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.2c04628 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.2c04628 2022

  19. [19]

    & Belkin, M

    Lee, J., Tymchenko, M., Argyropoulos, C., Chen, P.-Y., Lu, F., Demmerle, F., Boehm, G., Amann, M.-C., Alù, A. & Belkin, M. A. Giant nonlinear response from plasmonic metasurfaces coupled to intersubband transitions. Nature 511, 65–69 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    & De Angelis, C

    Carletti, L., Locatelli, A., Stepanenko, O., Leo, G. & De Angelis, C. Enhanced second-harmonic generation from magnetic resonance in AlGaAs nanoantennas. Optics Express 23, 26544. doi: 10. 1364/OE.23.026544 (2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    F., Carletti, L., Locatelli, A., Rocco, D., Finazzi, M., Ghirardini, L., Favero, I., Gomez, C., Lemaître, A., Celebrano, M., De Angelis, C

    Gili, V. F., Carletti, L., Locatelli, A., Rocco, D., Finazzi, M., Ghirardini, L., Favero, I., Gomez, C., Lemaître, A., Celebrano, M., De Angelis, C. & Leo, G. Monolithic AlGaAs second-harmonic nanoantennas. Optics Express 24, 15965. doi: 10.1364/OE.24.015965 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.24.015965 2016

  22. [22]

    A., Solntsev, A

    Camacho-Morales, R., Rahmani, M., Kruk, S., Wang, L., Xu, L., Smirnova, D. A., Solntsev, A. S., Miroshnichenko, A., Tan, H. H., Karouta, F., Naureen, S., Vora, K., Carletti, L., De Angelis, C., Jagadish, C., Kivshar, Y. S. & Neshev, D. N. Nonlinear Generation of Vector Beams From AlGaAs Nanoantennas. Nano Letters 16, 7191–7197. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03525 2016

  23. [23]

    & Zentgraf, T

    Li, G., Zhang, S. & Zentgraf, T. Nonlinear photonic metasurfaces. Nature Reviews Materials 2, 1–14. doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.10 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.10 2017

  24. [24]

    & Alù, A

    Krasnok, A., Tymchenko, M. & Alù, A. Nonlinear metasurfaces: a paradigm shift in nonlinear optics. Materials Today 21, 8–21. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.06.007 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2017.06.007 2017

  25. [25]

    J., Steinert, M., Geiss, R., Pertsch, T., Staude, I

    Fedotova, A., Younesi, M., Sautter, J., Vaskin, A., Löchner, F. J., Steinert, M., Geiss, R., Pertsch, T., Staude, I. & Setzpfandt, F. Second-Harmonic Generation in Resonant Nonlinear Metasurfaces Based on Lithium Niobate. Nano Letters 20, 8608–8614. doi: 10 . 1021 / acs . nanolett . 0c03290 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    Nobel Lecture: Quasielectric fields and band offsets: teaching electrons new tricks

    Kroemer, H. Nobel Lecture: Quasielectric fields and band offsets: teaching electrons new tricks. Reviews of Modern Physics 73, 783–793. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.783 (2001)

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.73.783 2001

  27. [27]

    & Tsu, R

    Esaki, L. & Tsu, R. Superlattice and Negative Differential Conductivity in Semiconductors. IBM Journal of Research and Development 14, 61–65. doi: 10.1147/rd.141.0061 (1970)

    work page doi:10.1147/rd.141.0061 1970

  28. [28]

    M., Yoo, S

    Fejer, M. M., Yoo, S. J. B., Byer, R. L., Harwit, A. & HarrisJr., J. S. Observation of extremely large quadratic susceptibility at 9.6 - 10.8 um in electric-field-biased AlGaAs quantum wells. Physical Review Letters 62, 1041–1044. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1041 (1989)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.62.1041 1989

  29. [29]

    L., Chu, S

    Sirtori, C., Capasso, F., Sivco, D. L., Chu, S. N. G. & Cho, A. Y. Observation of large second order susceptibility via intersubband transitions at ￿￿10 um in asymmetric coupled AlInAs/GaInAs quantum wells. Applied Physics Letters 59, 2302–2304. doi: 10.1063/1.106050 (1991)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.106050 1991

  30. [30]

    & Cho, A

    Capasso, F., Sirtori, C. & Cho, A. Coupled quantum well semiconductors with giant electric field tunable nonlinear optical properties in the infrared. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 30, 1313–

    work page

  31. [31]

    doi: 10.1109/3.303697 (1994)

    work page doi:10.1109/3.303697 1994

  32. [32]

    B., Belkin, M

    Sarma, R., Xu, J., de Ceglia, D., Carletti, L., Campione, S., Klem, J., Sinclair, M. B., Belkin, M. A. & Brener, I. An All-Dielectric Polaritonic Metasurface with a Giant Nonlinear Optical Response. Nano Letters 22, 896–903. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03325 (2022). 16

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03325 2022

  33. [33]

    A., Goh, H

    Mann, S. A., Goh, H. & Alù, A. Inverse Design of Nonlinear Polaritonic Metasurfaces for Second Harmonic Generation. ACS Photonics 10, 993–1000. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c01342 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.2c01342 2023

  34. [34]

    F., Jollivet, A., Wang, D., Cheng, J

    Quach, P., Liu, S. F., Jollivet, A., Wang, D., Cheng, J. Y., Isac, N., Pirotta, S., Bouville, D., Sheng, S. S., Imran, A., Chen, L., Li, D., Zheng, X. T., Wang, Y. X., Qin, Z. X., Tchernycheva, M., Julien, F. H., Shen, B. & Wang, X. Q. A GaN/AlN quantum cascade detector with a broad response from the mid-infrared (4.1 um) to the visible (550 nm) spectral ...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0003615 2020

  35. [35]

    E., Ma, Q., Tao, A

    Qian, H., Li, S., Chen, C.-F., Hsu, S.-W., Bopp, S. E., Ma, Q., Tao, A. R. & Liu, Z. Large optical nonlinearity enabled by coupled metallic quantum wells. Light: Science & Applications 8, 13. doi:10. 1038/s41377-019-0123-4 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    C., Xiong, W

    Chen, C.-F., Tian, F., Zhou, J., Wagner, J. C., Xiong, W. & Liu, Z. Giant optical second- and third- order nonlinearities at a telecom wavelength. Optics Letters 49, 3725. doi: 10 . 1364 / OL . 528340 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Second‐order susceptibility of asymmetric coupled quantum well structures

    Khurgin, J. Second‐order susceptibility of asymmetric coupled quantum well structures. Applied Physics Letters 51, 2100–2102. doi: 10.1063/1.98960 (1987)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.98960 1987

  38. [38]

    Second-order nonlinear effects in asymmetric quantum-well structures

    Khurgin, J. Second-order nonlinear effects in asymmetric quantum-well structures. Physical Review B 38, 4056–4066. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.4056 (1988)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.38.4056 1988

  39. [39]

    M., Meng, Q., Wen, K

    Ramesh, R., Hsieh, T., Skipper, A. M., Meng, Q., Wen, K. C., Shafiei, F., Wistey, M. A., Downer, M. C., Khurgin, J. B. & Bank, S. R. Interband second-order nonlinear optical susceptibility of asymmetric coupled quantum wells. Applied Physics Letters 123, 251111. doi: 10.1063/5.0168596 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0168596 2023

  40. [40]

    Ramesh, R., Brown, M., Ricks, A., Esfahani, S., Devaney, P., Wen, K., Waqar, M., Sakotic, Z., Mann, S., Hsieh, T., Skipper, A., Meng, Q., Jung, H., Cotrufo, M., Shafiei, F., Downer, M., Shakkottai, S., Wistey, M., Brener, I., Pan, X., Alu, A., Wasserman, D., Khurgin, J. B. & Bank, S. R. Enhanced Interband Optical Nonlinearities from Coupled Quantum Wells....

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    D., Winn, J

    Fan, S., Joannopoulos, J. D., Winn, J. N., Devenyi, A., Chen, J. C. & Meade, R. D. Guided and defect modes in periodic dielectric waveguides. Journal of the Optical Society of America B 12, 1267. doi:10.1364/JOSAB.12.001267 (1995)

    work page doi:10.1364/josab.12.001267 1995

  42. [42]

    and Jin, R

    Huang, L., Jin, R., Zhou, C., Li, G., Xu, L., Overvig, A., Deng, F., Chen, X., Lu, W., Alù, A. & Miroshnichenko, A. E. Ultrahigh-Q guided mode resonances in an All-dielectric metasurface. Nature Communications 14, 3433. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39227-5 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39227-5 2023

  43. [43]

    J., Kamboj, A., Mansfield, N

    Muhowski, A. J., Kamboj, A., Mansfield, N. C. & Wasserman, D. Mid-infrared rainbow light- emitting diodes. Applied Physics Letters 121, 261105. doi: 10.1063/5.0129196 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0129196 2022

  44. [44]

    S., Kim, G

    Bark, H. S., Kim, G. J. & Jeon, T.-I. Transmission characteristics of all-dielectric guided-mode resonance filter in the THz region. Scientific Reports 8, 13570. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31931-3 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-018-31931-3 2018

  45. [45]

    & Miller, B

    David, A. & Miller, B. in Quantum Dynamics of Simple Systems (eds Oppo, G.-L., Barnett, S. M., Riis, E. & Wilkinson, M.) 1st ed., 239–266 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2020). doi: 10 . 1201 / 9781003072973-9

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Quantum Cascade Lasers (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., 2013)

    Faist, J. Quantum Cascade Lasers (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., 2013)

    work page 2013

  47. [47]

    Boyd, R. W. Nonlinear optics 4th ed. (Academic Press, San Diego, 2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    & Petukhov, A

    Roke, S., Bonn, M. & Petukhov, A. V. Nonlinear optical scattering: The concept of effective suscep- tibility. Physical Review B 70, 115106. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.115106 (2004). 17

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.70.115106 2004

  49. [49]

    Yarykin, J

    Rose, A., Powell, D. A., Shadrivov, I. V., Smith, D. R. & Kivshar, Y. S. Circular dichroism of four- wave mixing in nonlinear metamaterials. Physical Review B 88, 195148. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.88. 195148 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.88 2013

  50. [50]

    R., Lee, I.-H., Maier, S

    Noor, A., Damodaran, A. R., Lee, I.-H., Maier, S. A., Oh, S.-H. & Ciracì, C. Mode-Matching Enhancement of Second-Harmonic Generation with Plasmonic Nanopatch Antennas. ACS Photonics 7, 3333–3340. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c01545 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.0c01545 2020

  51. [51]

    Nonlinear Optics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996)

    Bloembergen, N. Nonlinear Optics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996)

    work page 1996

  52. [52]

    & Vogl, P

    Birner, S., Zibold, T., Andlauer, T., Kubis, T., Sabathil, M., Trellakis, A. & Vogl, P. nextnano: General Purpose 3-D Simulations. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 54, 2137–2142. doi: 10. 1109/TED.2007.902871 (2007)

    work page arXiv 2007

  53. [53]

    Inverse Design of Lightweight Broadband Reflector for Relativistic Lightsail Propulsion , volume=

    Jin, W., Li, W., Orenstein, M. & Fan, S. Inverse Design of Lightweight Broadband Reflector for Rel- ativistic Lightsail Propulsion. ACS Photonics 7, 2350–2355. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c00768 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.0c00768 2020

  54. [54]

    C., Nordland, W

    Miller, R. C., Nordland, W. A. & Bridenbaugh, P. M. Dependence of Second‐Harmonic‐Generation Coefficients of LiNbO3 on Melt Composition. Journal of Applied Physics 42, 4145–4147. doi: 10 . 1063/1.1659746 (1971)

    work page 1971

  55. [55]

    Nikogosyan, D. N. Nonlinear Optical Crystals: A Complete Survey doi:10.1007/b138685 (Springer- Verlag, New York, 2005)

    work page doi:10.1007/b138685 2005

  56. [56]

    J., Hu, Y., Holzgrafe, J., Ghosh, S., Shams- Ansari, A., Puma, E., Sinclair, N., Reimer, C., Zhang, M

    Zhu, D., Shao, L., Yu, M., Cheng, R., Desiatov, B., Xin, C. J., Hu, Y., Holzgrafe, J., Ghosh, S., Shams- Ansari, A., Puma, E., Sinclair, N., Reimer, C., Zhang, M. & Lončar, M. Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate. Advances in Optics and Photonics 13, 242–352. doi:10.1364/AOP.411024 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1364/aop.411024 2021

  57. [57]

    Miller, R. C. Optical second harmonic generation in piezoelectric crystals. Applied Physics Letters 5, 17–19. doi: 10.1063/1.1754022 (1964)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1754022 1964

  58. [58]

    Takeshi, R

    Shoji, I., Kondo, T., Kitamoto, A., Shirane, M. & Ito, R. Absolute scale of second-order nonlinear- optical coefficients. Journal of the Optical Society of America B 14, 2268–2294. doi:10.1364/JOSAB. 14.002268 (1997)

    work page doi:10.1364/josab 1997

  59. [59]

    Simplified characterization of uniaxial and biaxial nonlinear optical crystals: a plea for standardization of nomenclature and conventions

    Roberts, D. Simplified characterization of uniaxial and biaxial nonlinear optical crystals: a plea for standardization of nomenclature and conventions. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 28, 2057–

    work page 2057

  60. [60]

    doi: 10.1109/3.159516 (1992)

    work page doi:10.1109/3.159516 1992

  61. [61]

    & Crespo, H

    Miranda, M., Fordell, T., Arnold, C., L’Huillier, A. & Crespo, H. Simultaneous compression and characterization of ultrashort laser pulses using chirped mirrors and glass wedges. Optics Express 20, 688–697. doi: 10.1364/OE.20.000688 (2012). 18 Supplementary Information for Quantum-Well-Metasurface to Maximize Nonlinear Polarization Pernille Undrum Fathi 1...

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.20.000688 2012